SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Common Logical Flaws
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 20 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument advanced
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Time-Shift Errors
2. 1. Lack of evidence for a position is take to prove that position is false. 2. Lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true.
False Analogy
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Circular Reasoning
Internal Contradiction
3. The author uses an analogy too dissimilar to the original situation to be applicable
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Appeal to Emotion
Appeal to Authority
False Analogy
4. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements
Internal Contradiction
False Analogy
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Straw Man
5. The author mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient condition - or vise-versa
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Numbers and Percentage Errors
False Analogy
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
6. Uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Appeal to Authority
Circular Reasoning
Appeal to Emotion
7. Occurs when emotions or emotionally-charged language is used in an attempt to persuade the reader
Time-Shift Errors
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Appeal to Emotion
Error of Composition
8. 1. Assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. Assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. Failure to consider an alternative cause for the effect 4. Failure to consider that the events may be reverse
Straw Man
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Mistaken Cause and Effect
9. The author improperly equates a percentage with a definite quantity or uses quantity information to make a judgment about the percentage represented by that quantity.
False Analogy
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
10. 1. The survey uses a biased sample. 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed. 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses.
Survey Errors
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
False Analogy
11. Using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Error of Division
12. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group
Survey Errors
Error of Composition
Errors in the Use of Evidence
False Dilemma
13. This error states that a position is true because the majority believes it to be true
Internal Contradiction
Appeal to Popular Opinion
False Dilemma
Appeal to Emotion
14. Takes a small number of instances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion (often appears as an incorrect answer)
Time-Shift Errors
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Error of Composition
Survey Errors
15. The author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts the argument - making it weaker in the process
Circular Reasoning
Error of Composition
Straw Man
Appeal to Authority
16. The author misuses information to such a degree that they fail to provide any information to support their conclusion or present information irrelevant to the conclusion
Appeal to Emotion
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Circular Reasoning
Error of Composition
17. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved
Error of Composition
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Circular Reasoning
Mistaken Cause and Effect
18. Assumes that only two courses of action are available when there may be others
Error of Division
Numbers and Percentage Errors
False Dilemma
Circular Reasoning
19. Assumes that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be case in the future.
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Appeal to Emotion
Internal Contradiction
Time-Shift Errors
20. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of the whole to a part of the group
Error of Composition
Time-Shift Errors
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Error of Division