SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Common Logical Flaws
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 20 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of the whole to a part of the group
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Error of Division
Errors in the Use of Evidence
False Dilemma
2. Using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument
Circular Reasoning
Straw Man
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Appeal to Authority
3. 1. Lack of evidence for a position is take to prove that position is false. 2. Lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true.
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Error of Division
4. Assumes that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be case in the future.
Time-Shift Errors
Survey Errors
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Appeal to Emotion
5. Occurs when emotions or emotionally-charged language is used in an attempt to persuade the reader
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Survey Errors
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Appeal to Emotion
6. 1. Assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. Assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. Failure to consider an alternative cause for the effect 4. Failure to consider that the events may be reverse
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Error of Division
Appeal to Authority
Error of Composition
7. The author uses an analogy too dissimilar to the original situation to be applicable
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Numbers and Percentage Errors
False Analogy
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
8. Takes a small number of instances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion (often appears as an incorrect answer)
Internal Contradiction
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Circular Reasoning
Survey Errors
9. The author misuses information to such a degree that they fail to provide any information to support their conclusion or present information irrelevant to the conclusion
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Appeal to Authority
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Appeal to Emotion
10. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved
Circular Reasoning
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Error of Composition
Straw Man
11. The author mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient condition - or vise-versa
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Appeal to Emotion
12. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument advanced
Error of Composition
Circular Reasoning
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
13. The author improperly equates a percentage with a definite quantity or uses quantity information to make a judgment about the percentage represented by that quantity.
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Error of Composition
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Internal Contradiction
14. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements
Appeal to Emotion
Error of Division
Internal Contradiction
Appeal to Popular Opinion
15. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Error of Composition
16. This error states that a position is true because the majority believes it to be true
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Appeal to Popular Opinion
17. 1. The survey uses a biased sample. 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed. 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses.
False Dilemma
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Survey Errors
18. The author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts the argument - making it weaker in the process
Error of Composition
Internal Contradiction
Appeal to Authority
Straw Man
19. Assumes that only two courses of action are available when there may be others
Circular Reasoning
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
False Dilemma
Numbers and Percentage Errors
20. Uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader
Error of Division
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Appeal to Authority