SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Common Logical Flaws
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 20 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The author misuses information to such a degree that they fail to provide any information to support their conclusion or present information irrelevant to the conclusion
False Analogy
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
2. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group
Circular Reasoning
Time-Shift Errors
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Error of Composition
3. The author improperly equates a percentage with a definite quantity or uses quantity information to make a judgment about the percentage represented by that quantity.
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Time-Shift Errors
Numbers and Percentage Errors
4. 1. The survey uses a biased sample. 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed. 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses.
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Error of Division
Straw Man
Survey Errors
5. This error states that a position is true because the majority believes it to be true
Internal Contradiction
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Appeal to Popular Opinion
6. The author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts the argument - making it weaker in the process
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Survey Errors
Straw Man
7. Takes a small number of instances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion (often appears as an incorrect answer)
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
8. Uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader
Internal Contradiction
Appeal to Authority
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Straw Man
9. The author mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient condition - or vise-versa
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Survey Errors
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
10. 1. Assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. Assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. Failure to consider an alternative cause for the effect 4. Failure to consider that the events may be reverse
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Straw Man
False Analogy
11. Assumes that only two courses of action are available when there may be others
False Dilemma
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Internal Contradiction
Appeal to Popular Opinion
12. Assumes that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be case in the future.
Time-Shift Errors
Straw Man
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
13. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of the whole to a part of the group
Error of Composition
Error of Division
False Dilemma
Appeal to Popular Opinion
14. The author uses an analogy too dissimilar to the original situation to be applicable
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
False Analogy
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
15. Occurs when emotions or emotionally-charged language is used in an attempt to persuade the reader
Appeal to Emotion
Time-Shift Errors
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Appeal to Popular Opinion
16. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved
Straw Man
Error of Composition
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Circular Reasoning
17. Using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument
Straw Man
Error of Composition
Error of Division
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
18. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument advanced
Appeal to Emotion
Error of Division
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Internal Contradiction
19. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements
Survey Errors
Time-Shift Errors
Internal Contradiction
Numbers and Percentage Errors
20. 1. Lack of evidence for a position is take to prove that position is false. 2. Lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true.
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Circular Reasoning
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization