SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Common Logical Flaws
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 20 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The author mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient condition - or vise-versa
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Error of Composition
Survey Errors
2. Assumes that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be case in the future.
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Error of Composition
Time-Shift Errors
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
3. Occurs when emotions or emotionally-charged language is used in an attempt to persuade the reader
Appeal to Emotion
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Appeal to Authority
4. 1. Lack of evidence for a position is take to prove that position is false. 2. Lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true.
False Analogy
Straw Man
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Errors in the Use of Evidence
5. Using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Numbers and Percentage Errors
False Dilemma
Appeal to Popular Opinion
6. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of the whole to a part of the group
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Error of Composition
Error of Division
7. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument advanced
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Error of Division
Internal Contradiction
Numbers and Percentage Errors
8. The author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts the argument - making it weaker in the process
Appeal to Authority
Straw Man
False Dilemma
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
9. Uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader
Time-Shift Errors
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Appeal to Authority
10. The author uses an analogy too dissimilar to the original situation to be applicable
False Analogy
False Dilemma
Time-Shift Errors
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
11. Assumes that only two courses of action are available when there may be others
False Dilemma
Error of Composition
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
12. 1. Assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. Assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. Failure to consider an alternative cause for the effect 4. Failure to consider that the events may be reverse
Mistaken Cause and Effect
False Dilemma
Circular Reasoning
Appeal to Popular Opinion
13. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Internal Contradiction
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Appeal to Authority
14. The author misuses information to such a degree that they fail to provide any information to support their conclusion or present information irrelevant to the conclusion
Error of Division
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
False Dilemma
15. The author improperly equates a percentage with a definite quantity or uses quantity information to make a judgment about the percentage represented by that quantity.
False Analogy
Error of Division
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Survey Errors
16. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Circular Reasoning
Straw Man
Appeal to Authority
17. 1. The survey uses a biased sample. 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed. 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses.
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Survey Errors
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
18. This error states that a position is true because the majority believes it to be true
Appeal to Authority
Internal Contradiction
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Appeal to Popular Opinion
19. Takes a small number of instances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion (often appears as an incorrect answer)
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Error of Composition
False Dilemma
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
20. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group
Straw Man
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Survey Errors
Error of Composition