SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Common Logical Flaws
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 20 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The author improperly equates a percentage with a definite quantity or uses quantity information to make a judgment about the percentage represented by that quantity.
Appeal to Emotion
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Error of Division
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
2. Assumes that only two courses of action are available when there may be others
False Dilemma
False Analogy
Survey Errors
Errors in the Use of Evidence
3. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument advanced
Survey Errors
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Error of Composition
4. The author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts the argument - making it weaker in the process
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Appeal to Emotion
Straw Man
Appeal to Popular Opinion
5. Assumes that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be case in the future.
False Analogy
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Time-Shift Errors
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
6. Uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader
Appeal to Authority
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Error of Composition
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
7. The author uses an analogy too dissimilar to the original situation to be applicable
False Analogy
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Time-Shift Errors
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
8. The author misuses information to such a degree that they fail to provide any information to support their conclusion or present information irrelevant to the conclusion
Internal Contradiction
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
9. 1. Assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. Assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. Failure to consider an alternative cause for the effect 4. Failure to consider that the events may be reverse
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
False Analogy
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
10. Takes a small number of instances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion (often appears as an incorrect answer)
Survey Errors
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Time-Shift Errors
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
11. 1. The survey uses a biased sample. 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed. 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses.
Appeal to Authority
Survey Errors
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Errors in the Use of Evidence
12. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements
Time-Shift Errors
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Internal Contradiction
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
13. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved
Circular Reasoning
Time-Shift Errors
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Internal Contradiction
14. Occurs when emotions or emotionally-charged language is used in an attempt to persuade the reader
Appeal to Emotion
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Survey Errors
Error of Division
15. The author mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient condition - or vise-versa
False Analogy
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Straw Man
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
16. Using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Internal Contradiction
17. 1. Lack of evidence for a position is take to prove that position is false. 2. Lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true.
Straw Man
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Internal Contradiction
False Dilemma
18. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of the whole to a part of the group
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Error of Composition
Error of Division
Appeal to Popular Opinion
19. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group
Survey Errors
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Error of Composition
Appeal to Emotion
20. This error states that a position is true because the majority believes it to be true
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Error of Division
Appeal to Authority
Numbers and Percentage Errors