SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Common Logical Flaws
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 20 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument advanced
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Straw Man
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
2. The author mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient condition - or vise-versa
Survey Errors
Internal Contradiction
False Dilemma
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
3. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Error of Composition
4. Assumes that only two courses of action are available when there may be others
False Dilemma
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Appeal to Authority
Time-Shift Errors
5. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Internal Contradiction
Error of Composition
6. The author uses an analogy too dissimilar to the original situation to be applicable
False Analogy
Internal Contradiction
Survey Errors
Error of Division
7. This error states that a position is true because the majority believes it to be true
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Survey Errors
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Error of Composition
8. Takes a small number of instances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion (often appears as an incorrect answer)
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Circular Reasoning
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
9. 1. Lack of evidence for a position is take to prove that position is false. 2. Lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true.
Error of Composition
False Analogy
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Appeal to Authority
10. The author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts the argument - making it weaker in the process
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Straw Man
Survey Errors
Error of Composition
11. The author misuses information to such a degree that they fail to provide any information to support their conclusion or present information irrelevant to the conclusion
Error of Composition
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Time-Shift Errors
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
12. Uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader
Appeal to Authority
Internal Contradiction
Time-Shift Errors
False Analogy
13. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Survey Errors
Circular Reasoning
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
14. The author improperly equates a percentage with a definite quantity or uses quantity information to make a judgment about the percentage represented by that quantity.
Time-Shift Errors
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
False Analogy
Numbers and Percentage Errors
15. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of the whole to a part of the group
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Appeal to Authority
Error of Division
16. Occurs when emotions or emotionally-charged language is used in an attempt to persuade the reader
Circular Reasoning
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Appeal to Emotion
Errors in the Use of Evidence
17. 1. Assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. Assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. Failure to consider an alternative cause for the effect 4. Failure to consider that the events may be reverse
Mistaken Cause and Effect
False Dilemma
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Error of Composition
18. Assumes that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be case in the future.
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Error of Division
False Dilemma
Time-Shift Errors
19. Using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument
Time-Shift Errors
Error of Composition
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
20. 1. The survey uses a biased sample. 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed. 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses.
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Error of Composition
Survey Errors
False Analogy