SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Common Logical Flaws
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 20 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1. Lack of evidence for a position is take to prove that position is false. 2. Lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true.
Appeal to Emotion
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Appeal to Authority
Errors in the Use of Evidence
2. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of the whole to a part of the group
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Internal Contradiction
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Error of Division
3. Takes a small number of instances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion (often appears as an incorrect answer)
Survey Errors
False Analogy
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
4. The author mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient condition - or vise-versa
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
5. The author misuses information to such a degree that they fail to provide any information to support their conclusion or present information irrelevant to the conclusion
False Dilemma
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Circular Reasoning
Straw Man
6. The author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts the argument - making it weaker in the process
False Analogy
Survey Errors
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Straw Man
7. Assumes that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be case in the future.
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Time-Shift Errors
Errors in the Use of Evidence
8. Uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader
Appeal to Authority
Internal Contradiction
Survey Errors
Time-Shift Errors
9. 1. Assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. Assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. Failure to consider an alternative cause for the effect 4. Failure to consider that the events may be reverse
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Appeal to Authority
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Mistaken Cause and Effect
10. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument advanced
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Survey Errors
Time-Shift Errors
11. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Internal Contradiction
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
12. This error states that a position is true because the majority believes it to be true
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Survey Errors
Numbers and Percentage Errors
13. The author improperly equates a percentage with a definite quantity or uses quantity information to make a judgment about the percentage represented by that quantity.
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Survey Errors
False Dilemma
Numbers and Percentage Errors
14. 1. The survey uses a biased sample. 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed. 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses.
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Survey Errors
False Analogy
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
15. Occurs when emotions or emotionally-charged language is used in an attempt to persuade the reader
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Error of Division
Appeal to Emotion
16. Using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument
Error of Composition
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Appeal to Popular Opinion
17. The author uses an analogy too dissimilar to the original situation to be applicable
False Dilemma
False Analogy
Error of Composition
Survey Errors
18. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Circular Reasoning
Internal Contradiction
19. Assumes that only two courses of action are available when there may be others
False Dilemma
Appeal to Authority
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Straw Man
20. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Error of Composition
Internal Contradiction
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)