SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Common Logical Flaws
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 20 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of the whole to a part of the group
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Error of Division
Time-Shift Errors
Appeal to Emotion
2. 1. Lack of evidence for a position is take to prove that position is false. 2. Lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true.
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Survey Errors
3. Assumes that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be case in the future.
Straw Man
Internal Contradiction
False Analogy
Time-Shift Errors
4. This error states that a position is true because the majority believes it to be true
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Time-Shift Errors
Appeal to Popular Opinion
False Analogy
5. Using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
False Analogy
Error of Composition
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
6. The author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts the argument - making it weaker in the process
False Analogy
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Straw Man
7. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument advanced
False Dilemma
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Appeal to Popular Opinion
8. Occurs when emotions or emotionally-charged language is used in an attempt to persuade the reader
Appeal to Emotion
Error of Composition
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Appeal to Popular Opinion
9. The author misuses information to such a degree that they fail to provide any information to support their conclusion or present information irrelevant to the conclusion
Appeal to Popular Opinion
Lack of Relevant Evidence for the Conclusion
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Numbers and Percentage Errors
10. The author uses an analogy too dissimilar to the original situation to be applicable
Mistaken Cause and Effect
False Analogy
Internal Contradiction
Appeal to Emotion
11. The author improperly equates a percentage with a definite quantity or uses quantity information to make a judgment about the percentage represented by that quantity.
False Dilemma
Error of Composition
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Survey Errors
12. Assumes that only two courses of action are available when there may be others
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Appeal to Popular Opinion
False Dilemma
False Analogy
13. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved
Circular Reasoning
Survey Errors
Time-Shift Errors
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
14. The author mistakes a necessary condition for a sufficient condition - or vise-versa
Appeal to Emotion
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
Error of Division
Error of Composition
15. 1. The survey uses a biased sample. 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed. 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses.
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Mistaken Cause and Effect
Survey Errors
Appeal to Emotion
16. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements
Survey Errors
Internal Contradiction
Errors in the Use of Evidence
Circular Reasoning
17. Uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader
Error of Division
Appeal to Authority
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Errors of Conditional Reasoning
18. Takes a small number of instances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion (often appears as an incorrect answer)
Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
Source Argument (Ad Hominem Attack)
Error of Division
Appeal to Authority
19. 1. Assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. Assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. Failure to consider an alternative cause for the effect 4. Failure to consider that the events may be reverse
Survey Errors
Numbers and Percentage Errors
Internal Contradiction
Mistaken Cause and Effect
20. Occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group
Error of Composition
Circular Reasoning
Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept (Equivocation)
Error of Division