SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Criminal Justice Research
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Reasoning from the general to the particular (or from cause to effect)
External Validity
Plagiarism
Deduction
Confidentiality
2. We must remain objective and value-free Yet - our decisions about what to study is strongly influenced by personal interests and other factors
Induction
External Validity
Role of Researcher
Researchese
3. Collection of accurate facts or data; attempt to address the issue of 'what is'
Cross-sectional design
Spurious relationship
Methodology
Scientism
4. Measurement of single variable at successive points in time
Paradigm
Time-series design
Internal validity
Confidentiality
5. College/University research committees that oversee and ensure ethical research standards
Advantages of experiments
Panel Studies
Institutional Review Board
Cohort studies
6. Accuracy within the study itself
Internal validity
Operationalization
Methodology
Concepts
7. 1. evidence of causality 2. control 3. cost 4. replication
Informed consent
Trend Studies
Variables
Advantages of experiments
8. 1. artificiality 2. limited scope
Qualitative research
Disadvantages of experiments
Dependent Variable
Cohort studies
9. A series of cross-sectional studies conducted on the same subjects (the PANEL) at different time intervals. Allows investigators to measure change in individuals.
Panel Studies
Paradigm
Methodology
Advantages of experiments
10. Broken windows can signal to people that no one cares about a building. Leads to more serious vandalism and attracts the wrong crowd
Dualistic fallacy
Qualitative research
Methodology
Broken Windows
11. Definition of concepts on the basis of how they are measured
Operationalization
Cohort studies
Informed consent
Hypothesis
12. Specific statements or predictions regarding the relationship between two variables
Philosophy
Internal validity
Hypothesis
Induction
13. Combines rationality and logical explanation with method - emphasizing observation - measurement - replication and verification
Time-series design
Science
Research Shock
Risk-benefit ratio
14. Research that relies on what is seen in field or naturalistic settings more than on statistical data
Spurious relationship
Qualitative research
Disadvantages of experiments
Deduction
15. Repetition of experiments or studies utilizing the same methodology
Rival causal factors
Replication
Positivism
Research Shock
16. View of all social events as a distinct chronicle of unique happenings
Historicism
Replication
Advantages of experiments
Operationalization
17. A piece of writing that has been copied from someone else and is presented as being your own work
Plagiarism
Risk-benefit ratio
Panel Studies
Trend Studies
18. Laws that protect researchers from being forced to reveal sources in court of law
Broken Windows
Shield laws
Qualitative research
Replication
19. Explains world through rationality and logical explanation
Philosophy
Methodology
Plagiarism
Research Shock
20. The outcome factor; the variable that may change in response to manipulations of the independent variable
Plagiarism
Internal validity
Dependent Variable
Research Shock
21. Plausible explanation of reality
Informed consent
Dependent Variable
Time-series design
Theory
22. Concepts that can vary or take on different numerical values; operationalized concepts
Variables
Informed consent
Trend Studies
Replication
23. Requirement that any information obtained in research be treated as confidential and not be revealed in any manner that would identify or harm subjects
Replication
Concepts
Confidentiality
Plagiarism
24. Aliases used in research reports to protect the identity of respondents
Advantages of experiments
Pseudonyms
Dependent Variable
Positivism
25. The process that moves from a given series of specifics to a generalization
Advantages of experiments
Trend Studies
External Validity
Induction
26. The idea that delinquents and nondelinquents are two fundamentally different types of people
Dualistic fallacy
Role of Researcher
Verification
Cross-sectional design
27. A model or schema that provides a perspective from which to view reality
Broken Windows
Deduction
Variables
Paradigm
28. A type of longitudinal design to gather data from different samples across time
Internal validity
Trend Studies
Induction
Longitudinal design
29. Language of research
Verstehen
Researchese
Induction
Historicism
30. Fanatical adherence to a preferred method at the expense of substance; view that there is one and only one way of doing research - that is - by employing the one - best method
Methodology
Induction
Verstehen
Methodological Narcissism
31. Agreement of subjects to participate in research after they have been briefed
External Validity
Replication
Informed consent
Panel Studies
32. Abstract or symbolic tags placed on reality
Cohort studies
Positivism
Concepts
Spurious relationship
33. A scientific approach to knowledge based on 'positive' facts as opposed to mere speculation
Positivism
Risk-benefit ratio
Quantitative research
Institutional Review Board
34. Research that collects and reports data primarily in numerical form. Concepts are assigned to numerical values. On a scale of 1-5 how well do you like this class? (1=lowest)
Rival causal factors
Quantitative research
Institutional Review Board
Time-series design
35. Highs and lows in data found
Research Shock
Philosophy
Shield laws
Replication
36. Weber's notion that the purpose of research is to gain a qualitative 'understanding' of phenomena from the perspective of the subjects
Quantitative research
Advantages of experiments
Risk-benefit ratio
Verstehen
37. Confirmation of the accuracy of findings; attainment of greater certitude in conclusions through additional observations
Verification
Rival causal factors
Induction
Science
38. The experimental factor that is manipulated; the variable whose effect is being studied
Independent Variable
Rival causal factors
Cohort studies
Double-blind Experiment
39. A research design in which the same people are studied or tested repeatedly over time
Broken Windows
Longitudinal design
Pseudonyms
Theory
40. Neither the subjects nor administrators in an experiment know which group is receiving the treatment
Longitudinal design
Risk-benefit ratio
Double-blind Experiment
Scientism
41. A research design in which investigators compare groups of subjects of differing age who are observed at a single point in time.
Dualistic fallacy
Deduction
Cross-sectional design
Disadvantages of experiments
42. Variables other than X - the independent variable that may be responsible for the outcome
Longitudinal design
Historicism
Rival causal factors
Deduction
43. Accuracy in the ability to generalize or infer findings from a study to a larger population
External Validity
Positivism
Double-blind Experiment
Deduction
44. View that - if one cannot quantitatively measure a phenomenon - it is not worth studying
Scientism
Independent Variable
Qualitative research
Theory
45. A system of mutual obligation between subjects and researchers; because the subjects cooperation assisted the researcher - the researcher owes the subject professional regard
Cross-sectional design
Shield laws
Reciprocity
Philosophy
46. A group of subjects followed over a long period with data collected multiple times during the course of their lives
Panel Studies
Cohort studies
Variables
Quantitative research
47. False relationship that can be explained away by other variables
Confidentiality
Shield laws
Risk-benefit ratio
Spurious relationship
48. Subjective evaluation of the risk to a research participant relative to the benefit both to the individual and to society of the results of the proposed research.
Cross-sectional design
Risk-benefit ratio
Induction
Concepts