Test your basic knowledge |

Criminal Law 101: Court Cases

Subject : law
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Dangerousness test - bail may be denied if there is clear and convincing evidence that defendant are dangerous and pose a threat to the community at large and the court participants in particular






2. Probationers have the right to an attorney at probation revocation hearings






3. The death penalty is not being administered equitably






4. Made it more difficult for inmates to win unconstitutional conditions of confinement cases; inmates must demonstrate specific unconstitutional conditions of confinement - and specific intent on the part of specific prison officials to maintain those






5. Indigents have the right to a legal counsel during the trial stage; the state will appoint an attorney to the case if the individual cannot afford one






6. The death penalty cannot be administered to those who were 17 years of age or under when the offense was committed






7. Evidence seized by reasonably well- trained officers acting in good faith - is admissible - even if the seizure technically violated the law; known as the good faith exemption






8. Allows the death penalty to be administered as long as the capital sentence is not mandatory - aggravating and mitigating circumstances are considered - and a bifurcated proceeding (i.e. - different judges determine guilt and sentence)






9. Inmates have the right to an institutional disciplinary hearing - written advance notice of the hearing - to present evidence/witnesses/testify in their own behalf at the hearing - and a formal ruling is to be placed in their file






10. Exclusionary Rule applied to the states - evidence unlawfully seized is inadmissible in court






11. Garbage containers outside of the curtilage of the home are considered abandoned and may be searched without a warrant and without cause






12. Requests for counsel during the police interrogation stage are offense specific (see also Minnick v Mississippi)






13. Assets forfeited under RICO are limited to those that were gained from and/or used in the criminal enterprise






14. Liability under RICO requires some primary participation in the operation and management of the criminal enterprise






15. Even when armed with a warrant - the police generally must 'knock and announce' before entering a home






16. The erroneous admission of a coerced confession at trial does not constitute grounds for an automatic mistrial; in some cases - an involuntary confession can be taken and legally admitted as evidence; the totality of the circumstances is to be consid






17. If probable cause of another offense arises during a routine vehicle/traffic stop - every occupant and every part of the vehicle and its contents - including closed and locked containers in the vehicle - may be searched; search justification arises o






18. Illegally seized evidence can be used to impeach a witness who takes the stand during a trial






19. The standard proof in a juvenile court adjudication is beyond a reasonable doubt






20. Once suspects invoke their right to an attorney - officials must cease questioning the suspect until counsel is present






21. An investigatory search may be conducted if the totality of the circumstances establishes reasonable suspicion to believe that a person matches the drug courier profile






22. Bail bond agents may use physical force to capture their bondees who have skipped bail - as long as the force used is reasonably related to the custody and/or transportation of the bondees






23. Parolees have no right to legal counsel at parole revocation hearings






24. Randomized consent searches of individuals who are on public transportation is acceptable - even though such searches carry some degree of implied coercion and are not truly voluntary; the governing test is whether a reasonable person feels free to d






25. Juvenile court proceedings must possess the elements of basic fundamental fairness; juveniles have the right to a proper hearing - to have an advance notification of that hearing and its purpose - the right to be present at the hearing - the right to






26. Evidence that is unlawfully seized by any official cannot be used in federal court; the exclusionary rule is applied to the federal courts






27. An illegally obtained confessions can be used to impeach the defendant's testimony at trial






28. Reasonable suspicion is the standard to be used by public school officials to conduct searches on public school grounds of individuals who may be violating either the law or school rules






29. Officers may search the suspect and the adjoining space region incident to a lawful arrest; if there is reasonable suspicion to believe that there is hidden danger present - officers may conduct a protective sweep of the area - but it is only to be a






30. Police may conduct brief - scientifically random/systemic - suspicionless searches of motorists at fixed roadside checkpoints






31. A search cannot shock the conscience - and cannot be exploratory






32. Capital punishment is not a suitable penalty for mentally retarded defendants; such a penalty is excessive - when involving mentally retarded defendants






33. A stop and frisk search may be performed when there isreasonable suspicion to believe that the offender has violated the law - past tense






34. Specific intent to discriminate against an individual must be demonstrated before that individual's death sentence can be set aside; intent over impact






35. Defendants have the right to trial by jury if the potential sentence is more than six months of incarceration (see also Baldwin v New York)






36. Newly discovered evidence demonstrating the actual innocence of the person sentenced to death does not provide automatic habeas corpus relief






37. No specific cause nor a search warrant is needed to search either open fields or non-habitable buildings (see also Oliver v U.S.)






38. Defendants have no Constitutional right to waive a jury trial






39. Reasonable suspicion can be used as the basis for investigative searches and seizures in situations involving pre-eminent public interests; specifically - reasonable suspicion is the standard to be used to allow investigatory searches of individuals






40. Defendants are entitled to a limited number of habeas appeals in capital cases






41. If the criminal conduct is the product of government agent creativity/if the government induced the individual to commit a crime that they otherwise would not have committed - the government action would be considered entrapment and the individual wo






42. Failure to appear test - bail may be denied if there is probable cause to believe that defendants will fail to appear at future judicial proceedings






43. Evidence illegally seized by a federal official cannot be used in federal court






44. Suspects must be informed of their basic rights at the point of arrest - particularly the right to remain silent and the right to have counsel present during any interrogations; confessions must meet the tests of voluntariness and awareness






45. The right to counsel begins at the point of focus






46. A vehicle that has been impounded by police officials can be searched in its entirety; all items found in the vehicle - include closed and locked items - may also searched






47. Civil forfeitures under RICO are not automatic; they require a separate civil proceeding






48. (good faith exemption) evidence seized by reasonably well- trained officers acting in good faith - is admissible - even if the seizure technically violated the law






49. Apparent authority doctrine - if consent to search is given by someone who does not have the authority to do so - but the police reasonably believed they did - the evidence is still admissible in court






50. There is no right to a jury trial for juveniles being adjudicated in juvenile court