SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Criminal Law 101: Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Evidence that is unlawfully seized by any official cannot be used in federal court; the exclusionary rule is applied to the federal courts
ELKINS v U.S
WOLFF v McDONNELL...
MICHIGAN v HARVEY...
WEEKS v U.S
2. Suspects must be informed of their basic rights at the point of arrest - particularly the right to remain silent and the right to have counsel present during any interrogations; confessions must meet the tests of voluntariness and awareness
ILLINOIS v RODRIGUEZ
MIRANDA v ARIZONA...
ELKINS v U.S
MICHIGAN v HARVEY...
3. Civil forfeitures under RICO are not automatic; they require a separate civil proceeding
U.S. v JAMES DANIEL GOOD
MASSACHUSETTS v SHEPPARD
REVES v ERNST AND YOUNG
SINGER v U.S
4. Parolees have no right to legal counsel at parole revocation hearings
D.C. v HELLER
STACK v BOYLE
MORRISSEY v BREWER...
U.S. v 92 BUENA VISTA AVENUE
5. Plea bargaining is legal as long as an attorney is present to protect the defendant's rights - the plea is voluntarily made - and the defendant has a full knowledge of the consequences
NIX v WILLIAMS
BRADY v U.S
HERRERA v COLLINS...
CALIFORNIA v GREENWOOD
6. The 2nd Amendment protects the right of individuals to possess a firearm for personal use; specifically - there is a constitutional right to keep a handgun in the home for self defense
GAGNON v SCARPELLI...
HARRIS v U.S.
D.C. v HELLER
IN RE WINSHIP...
7. Reasonable suspicion can be used as the basis for investigative searches and seizures in situations involving pre-eminent public interests; specifically - reasonable suspicion is the standard to be used to allow investigatory searches of individuals
ARIZONA v FULMINANTE
FLORIDA v ROYER
U.S. v LEON
ELKINS v U.S
8. Apparent authority doctrine - if consent to search is given by someone who does not have the authority to do so - but the police reasonably believed they did - the evidence is still admissible in court
MARYLAND v BUIE
McCLESKEY v ZANT...
ILLINOIS v RODRIGUEZ
McNEIL v WISCONSIN...
9. Probationers have the right to an attorney at probation revocation hearings
U.S. v HENSLEY
U.S. v 92 BUENA VISTA AVENUE
GAGNON v SCARPELLI...
McCLESKEY v KEMP...
10. Police may stop and search a vehicle without a warrant if there is probable cause to believe that the vehicle is carrying individuals or articles that offend the law - and the vehicle is now or is about to be moved
U.S. v HENSLEY
GIDEON v WAINWRIGHT...
CARROLL v U.S
CALIFORNIA v HODARI D
11. There is no right to a jury trial for juveniles being adjudicated in juvenile court
FLORIDA v ROYER
McKEIVER v PENNSYLVANIA...
McNEIL v WISCONSIN...
TAYLOR v TAINTOR
12. Defendants have the right to trial by jury if the potential sentence is more than six months of incarceration (see also Baldwin v New York)
HARRIS v U.S.
MINNICK v MISSISSIPPI...
U.S. v DUNN
DUNCAN v LOUISIANA
13. Newly discovered evidence demonstrating the actual innocence of the person sentenced to death does not provide automatic habeas corpus relief
NIX v WILLIAMS
HERRERA v COLLINS...
U.S. v SOKOLOW
U.S. v 92 BUENA VISTA AVENUE
14. Specific intent to discriminate against an individual must be demonstrated before that individual's death sentence can be set aside; intent over impact
FLORIDA v BOSTICK
McCLESKEY v KEMP...
ESCOBEDO v ILLINOIS...
ARIZONA v FULMINANTE
15. Made it more difficult for inmates to win unconstitutional conditions of confinement cases; inmates must demonstrate specific unconstitutional conditions of confinement - and specific intent on the part of specific prison officials to maintain those
WILSON v SEITER...
FLORIDA v BOSTICK
BRADY v U.S
IN RE WINSHIP...
16. Inevitable discovery exemption - evidence that was illegallyseized may be used in court if it can be shown that it would have inevitably been discovered
GREGG v GEORGIA...
MAPP v OHIO
McNEIL v WISCONSIN...
NIX v WILLIAMS
17. Inmates have the right to an institutional disciplinary hearing - written advance notice of the hearing - to present evidence/witnesses/testify in their own behalf at the hearing - and a formal ruling is to be placed in their file
ESCOBEDO v ILLINOIS...
TERRY v OHIO
McCLESKEY v ZANT...
WOLFF v McDONNELL...
18. Defendants have no Constitutional right to waive a jury trial
ILLINOIS v RODRIGUEZ
U.S. v HENSLEY
SINGER v U.S
NEW JERSEY v TLO
19. Totality of the circumstances test - taken piecemeal - the evidence may not amount to probable cause - but if taken together as a whole the evidence achieves that level - the legal standard of proof for the search has been met
GIDEON v WAINWRIGHT...
ILLINOIS v GATES
NEW JERSEY v TLO
MAPP v OHIO
20. If the criminal conduct is the product of government agent creativity/if the government induced the individual to commit a crime that they otherwise would not have committed - the government action would be considered entrapment and the individual wo
MAPP v OHIO
U.S. v DUNN
CALIFORNIA v GREENWOOD
SHERMAN v U.S....
21. Failure to appear test - bail may be denied if there is probable cause to believe that defendants will fail to appear at future judicial proceedings
WEEKS v U.S
CARROLL v U.S
STACK v BOYLE
HERRERA v COLLINS...
22. The right to counsel begins at the point of focus
NEW JERSEY v TLO
U.S. v SALERNO
ARIZONA v FULMINANTE
ESCOBEDO v ILLINOIS...
23. Evidence seized by reasonably well- trained officers acting in good faith - is admissible - even if the seizure technically violated the law; known as the good faith exemption
TERRY v OHIO
ELKINS v U.S
HARRIS v U.S.
U.S. v LEON
24. Dangerousness test - bail may be denied if there is clear and convincing evidence that defendant are dangerous and pose a threat to the community at large and the court participants in particular
MIRANDA v ARIZONA...
MINNICK v MISSISSIPPI...
ROCHIN v CALIFORNIA
U.S. v SALERNO
25. Assets forfeited under RICO are limited to those that were gained from and/or used in the criminal enterprise
MIRANDA v ARIZONA...
U.S. v 92 BUENA VISTA AVENUE
FLORIDA v BOSTICK
McCLESKEY v KEMP...
26. If probable cause of another offense arises during a routine vehicle/traffic stop - every occupant and every part of the vehicle and its contents - including closed and locked containers in the vehicle - may be searched; search justification arises o
U.S. v ROSS
WEEKS v U.S
U.S. v LEON
NIX v WILLIAMS
27. A stop and frisk search may be conducted when there is reasonable suspicion to believe that an individual is now or is about to engage in criminal behavior
TERRY v OHIO
U.S. v HENSLEY
MAPP v OHIO
NEW JERSEY v TLO
28. An illegally obtained confessions can be used to impeach the defendant's testimony at trial
U.S. v ROSS
MICHIGAN v HARVEY...
ESCOBEDO v ILLINOIS...
McCLESKEY v ZANT...
29. Defendants are entitled to a limited number of habeas appeals in capital cases
CARROLL v U.S
NEW JERSEY v TLO
U.S. v HENSLEY
McCLESKEY v ZANT...
30. Liability under RICO requires some primary participation in the operation and management of the criminal enterprise
ELKINS v U.S
REVES v ERNST AND YOUNG
GIDEON v WAINWRIGHT...
McKEIVER v PENNSYLVANIA...
31. The death penalty is not being administered equitably
McNEIL v WISCONSIN...
CARROLL v U.S
U.S. v HAVENS
FURMAN v GEORGIA...
32. An investigatory search may be conducted if the totality of the circumstances establishes reasonable suspicion to believe that a person matches the drug courier profile
U.S. v SOKOLOW
DUNCAN v LOUISIANA
FURMAN v GEORGIA...
GAGNON v SCARPELLI...
33. Randomized consent searches of individuals who are on public transportation is acceptable - even though such searches carry some degree of implied coercion and are not truly voluntary; the governing test is whether a reasonable person feels free to d
DELAWARE v PROUSE
GREGG v GEORGIA...
FLORIDA v BOSTICK
MINNICK v MISSISSIPPI...
34. Bail bond agents may use physical force to capture their bondees who have skipped bail - as long as the force used is reasonably related to the custody and/or transportation of the bondees
U.S. v HENSLEY
U.S. v 92 BUENA VISTA AVENUE
ILLINOIS v RODRIGUEZ
TAYLOR v TAINTOR
35. (good faith exemption) evidence seized by reasonably well- trained officers acting in good faith - is admissible - even if the seizure technically violated the law
MASSACHUSETTS v SHEPPARD
U.S. v SOKOLOW
FLORIDA v BOSTICK
ESCOBEDO v ILLINOIS...
36. Even when armed with a warrant - the police generally must 'knock and announce' before entering a home
WILSON v ARKANSAS
TAYLOR v TAINTOR
NEW JERSEY v TLO
U.S. v SALERNO
37. Requests for counsel during the police interrogation stage are offense specific (see also Minnick v Mississippi)
ROCHIN v CALIFORNIA
DUNCAN v LOUISIANA
McNEIL v WISCONSIN...
FURMAN v GEORGIA...
38. Plain view doctrine - if the officer is legally present - the offending objects are in plain view - and the incriminating nature is readily apparent - the items may be seized without a warrant
ILLINOIS v GATES
HARRIS v U.S.
SHERMAN v U.S....
DUNCAN v LOUISIANA
39. The death penalty cannot be administered to those who were 17 years of age or under when the offense was committed
McKEIVER v PENNSYLVANIA...
U.S. v ROSS
ROPER v SIMMONS...
U.S. v SOKOLOW
40. The erroneous admission of a coerced confession at trial does not constitute grounds for an automatic mistrial; in some cases - an involuntary confession can be taken and legally admitted as evidence; the totality of the circumstances is to be consid
ARIZONA v FULMINANTE
ESCOBEDO v ILLINOIS...
HERRERA v COLLINS...
WEEKS v U.S
41. Garbage containers outside of the curtilage of the home are considered abandoned and may be searched without a warrant and without cause
CALIFORNIA v GREENWOOD
U.S. v DUNN
COLORADO v BERTINE
NIX v WILLIAMS
42. Officers may search the suspect and the adjoining space region incident to a lawful arrest; if there is reasonable suspicion to believe that there is hidden danger present - officers may conduct a protective sweep of the area - but it is only to be a
MARYLAND v BUIE
CARROLL v U.S
IN RE GAULT...
IN RE WINSHIP...
43. Exclusionary Rule applied to the states - evidence unlawfully seized is inadmissible in court
MAPP v OHIO
MINNICK v MISSISSIPPI...
McNEIL v WISCONSIN...
McCLESKEY v ZANT...
44. Reasonable suspicion is the standard to be used by public school officials to conduct searches on public school grounds of individuals who may be violating either the law or school rules
U.S. v LEON
MINNICK v MISSISSIPPI...
NEW JERSEY v TLO
U.S. v DUNN
45. No specific cause nor a search warrant is needed to search either open fields or non-habitable buildings (see also Oliver v U.S.)
U.S. v DUNN
CALIFORNIA v HODARI D
U.S. v ROSS
U.S. v SALERNO
46. Indigents have the right to a legal counsel during the trial stage; the state will appoint an attorney to the case if the individual cannot afford one
GIDEON v WAINWRIGHT...
STACK v BOYLE
MASSACHUSETTS v SHEPPARD
WEEKS v U.S
47. Juvenile court proceedings must possess the elements of basic fundamental fairness; juveniles have the right to a proper hearing - to have an advance notification of that hearing and its purpose - the right to be present at the hearing - the right to
U.S. v HAVENS
GAGNON v SCARPELLI...
U.S. v LEON
IN RE GAULT...
48. Police may conduct brief - scientifically random/systemic - suspicionless searches of motorists at fixed roadside checkpoints
MINNICK v MISSISSIPPI...
U.S. v 92 BUENA VISTA AVENUE
DELAWARE v PROUSE
TERRY v OHIO
49. Illegally seized evidence can be used to impeach a witness who takes the stand during a trial
MARYLAND v BUIE
MASSACHUSETTS v SHEPPARD
U.S. v HAVENS
HERRERA v COLLINS...
50. A vehicle that has been impounded by police officials can be searched in its entirety; all items found in the vehicle - include closed and locked items - may also searched
WILSON v ARKANSAS
TAYLOR v TAINTOR
COLORADO v BERTINE
MASSACHUSETTS v SHEPPARD
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests