Test your basic knowledge |

Criminal Law 101: Court Cases

Subject : law
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Capital punishment is not a suitable penalty for mentally retarded defendants; such a penalty is excessive - when involving mentally retarded defendants






2. If probable cause of another offense arises during a routine vehicle/traffic stop - every occupant and every part of the vehicle and its contents - including closed and locked containers in the vehicle - may be searched; search justification arises o






3. Dangerousness test - bail may be denied if there is clear and convincing evidence that defendant are dangerous and pose a threat to the community at large and the court participants in particular






4. Evidence seized by reasonably well- trained officers acting in good faith - is admissible - even if the seizure technically violated the law; known as the good faith exemption






5. An investigatory search may be conducted if the totality of the circumstances establishes reasonable suspicion to believe that a person matches the drug courier profile






6. A vehicle that has been impounded by police officials can be searched in its entirety; all items found in the vehicle - include closed and locked items - may also searched






7. The standard proof in a juvenile court adjudication is beyond a reasonable doubt






8. Randomized consent searches of individuals who are on public transportation is acceptable - even though such searches carry some degree of implied coercion and are not truly voluntary; the governing test is whether a reasonable person feels free to d






9. Defendants are entitled to a limited number of habeas appeals in capital cases






10. Even when armed with a warrant - the police generally must 'knock and announce' before entering a home






11. Parolees have no right to legal counsel at parole revocation hearings






12. Defendants have the right to trial by jury if the potential sentence is more than six months of incarceration (see also Baldwin v New York)






13. A stop and frisk search may be performed when there isreasonable suspicion to believe that the offender has violated the law - past tense






14. A search cannot shock the conscience - and cannot be exploratory






15. Evidence illegally seized by a federal official cannot be used in federal court






16. Plain view doctrine - if the officer is legally present - the offending objects are in plain view - and the incriminating nature is readily apparent - the items may be seized without a warrant






17. Specific intent to discriminate against an individual must be demonstrated before that individual's death sentence can be set aside; intent over impact






18. Juvenile court proceedings must possess the elements of basic fundamental fairness; juveniles have the right to a proper hearing - to have an advance notification of that hearing and its purpose - the right to be present at the hearing - the right to






19. Requests for counsel during the police interrogation stage are offense specific (see also Minnick v Mississippi)






20. Reasonable suspicion can be used as the basis for investigative searches and seizures in situations involving pre-eminent public interests; specifically - reasonable suspicion is the standard to be used to allow investigatory searches of individuals






21. Probationers have the right to an attorney at probation revocation hearings






22. Apparent authority doctrine - if consent to search is given by someone who does not have the authority to do so - but the police reasonably believed they did - the evidence is still admissible in court






23. Once suspects invoke their right to an attorney - officials must cease questioning the suspect until counsel is present






24. The right to counsel begins at the point of focus






25. Exclusionary Rule applied to the states - evidence unlawfully seized is inadmissible in court






26. Police may conduct brief - scientifically random/systemic - suspicionless searches of motorists at fixed roadside checkpoints






27. Reasonable suspicion is the standard to be used by public school officials to conduct searches on public school grounds of individuals who may be violating either the law or school rules






28. Illegally seized evidence can be used to impeach a witness who takes the stand during a trial






29. (good faith exemption) evidence seized by reasonably well- trained officers acting in good faith - is admissible - even if the seizure technically violated the law






30. Totality of the circumstances test - taken piecemeal - the evidence may not amount to probable cause - but if taken together as a whole the evidence achieves that level - the legal standard of proof for the search has been met






31. Newly discovered evidence demonstrating the actual innocence of the person sentenced to death does not provide automatic habeas corpus relief






32. Failure to appear test - bail may be denied if there is probable cause to believe that defendants will fail to appear at future judicial proceedings






33. Liability under RICO requires some primary participation in the operation and management of the criminal enterprise






34. Allows the death penalty to be administered as long as the capital sentence is not mandatory - aggravating and mitigating circumstances are considered - and a bifurcated proceeding (i.e. - different judges determine guilt and sentence)






35. Inmates have the right to an institutional disciplinary hearing - written advance notice of the hearing - to present evidence/witnesses/testify in their own behalf at the hearing - and a formal ruling is to be placed in their file






36. The death penalty cannot be administered to those who were 17 years of age or under when the offense was committed






37. No specific cause nor a search warrant is needed to search either open fields or non-habitable buildings (see also Oliver v U.S.)






38. A stop and frisk search may be conducted when there is reasonable suspicion to believe that an individual is now or is about to engage in criminal behavior






39. If the criminal conduct is the product of government agent creativity/if the government induced the individual to commit a crime that they otherwise would not have committed - the government action would be considered entrapment and the individual wo






40. Evidence discarded by an individual fleeing from the police is admissible in court - even if the police had no advance cause to focus attention upon the person who discarded the material






41. Civil forfeitures under RICO are not automatic; they require a separate civil proceeding






42. Evidence that is unlawfully seized by any official cannot be used in federal court; the exclusionary rule is applied to the federal courts






43. Inevitable discovery exemption - evidence that was illegallyseized may be used in court if it can be shown that it would have inevitably been discovered






44. There is no right to a jury trial for juveniles being adjudicated in juvenile court






45. Bail bond agents may use physical force to capture their bondees who have skipped bail - as long as the force used is reasonably related to the custody and/or transportation of the bondees






46. Police may stop and search a vehicle without a warrant if there is probable cause to believe that the vehicle is carrying individuals or articles that offend the law - and the vehicle is now or is about to be moved






47. Defendants have no Constitutional right to waive a jury trial






48. An illegally obtained confessions can be used to impeach the defendant's testimony at trial






49. The erroneous admission of a coerced confession at trial does not constitute grounds for an automatic mistrial; in some cases - an involuntary confession can be taken and legally admitted as evidence; the totality of the circumstances is to be consid






50. The death penalty is not being administered equitably