SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
DSST Criminal Justice
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
dsst
,
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A government official who conducts criminal prosecutions on behalf of the state
Against Plea bargaining:
Atkins v. Virginia
Prosecutor
USA Patriot Act
2. Made victim impact statements legal
Procunier vs. Martinez
Payne V. Tennessee
Discovery:
baston v. kentucky
3. In pre-trial in which each party can obtain evidence from opposing party
Discovery:
In Re Gault
victim impact statements
Indictment
4. Amnesty - Bail - good behavior
Real evidence
List three ways a person can be released from jail
Homeland security
Presentence investigation
5. A prisoner has no reasoable expectations of privacy in his prison cell and no protections against what would otherwise be unreasonable searches 4th amendment
Plea Bargain
Hudson v. Palmer
Trial Proceedures
Ddvantages of probation and parole?
6. 2003 - illegal to execute mentally retarded
Runs juvenile hall
restitution
Atkins v. Virginia
Court apointed council
7. A formal charge or accusation of a serious crime
Peremptory Challenges:
What is another term used to identify supreme courts
Small Courts Claim
Indictment
8. Prisoners challenged the constitutionality of state regulations covering censorship of prisoner mail on the grounds that they violated the prisoners free-speech rights. REstrictions on speech must be justified as the necessity for security and the ru
Recidivism:
Procunier vs. Martinez
Kentucky vs. Louisiana
circunstancial evidence
9. A pre-sentence report is a legal term referring to the investigation into the history of person convicted of a crime before sentencing. Probation officer makes it.
3 level of security associated with prisons
Runs juvenile hall
Pre-sentence report
The difference between mitigating and aggravating circumstances as it pertains to sentencing
10. Consecutive - one after the other and Concurrent is at same time
USA Patriot Act
Atkins v. Virginia
Discovery:
The difference between consecutive and concurrent sentencing?
11. Underlying conditions--> international encironment --> state--> organizations --> leadership
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
Wolff v. McDaniel
Terrorism- Causes:
Cause challenges:
12. Grand Jury
Peremptory Challenges:
Discovery:
5th Amendment
Probation officer
13. A public official authorized to decide questions brought before a court of justice
Judge
Court Clerk
What is another term used to identify supreme courts
Forfeiture laws
14. Court holds that bail must be reasonable but set at level to insure defendant's appearance at trial
Stack Vs. Boyle
determinate sentencing
Probation
Arraignment
15. Most widely used goal is to individualize punishment - inmates eligible for parole after serving minimum
Grand Jury
Intermediate sentencing
Hudson v. Palmer
Venue
16. Jury trial in civil cases
Kentucky vs. Louisiana
No lo contendre
7th Amendment
Trial Jury
17. It is the receiving point for CA department of corrections
Real evidence
victim impact statements
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
3 level of security associated with prisons
18. A writ whcih requires a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court. This ensure that a prisoner can be released form unlawful detention.
Payne V. Tennessee
5 functions which take place at an arraignment
Habeus corpus
Domestic terrorism
19. Circumstances relating to the commission of a crime that make it more grave than average instance of that crime
Recidivism:
aggravating circumstances
Real evidence
Roper v. Simmons
20. Prohibits peremptory challenges based on race
Atkins v. Virginia
determinate sentencing
baston v. kentucky
How does an individual become a federal judge
21. 1976 - Bifurcated trials - the guilt and innocent phase is separate from the punishment
USA Patriot Act
Gregg V. Georgia
Preliminary Hearing
Challenges to the array
22. Full time- salaried
public defender
Rules of evidence
contract attorneys
Criminal Complaint
23. Excusing a juror from a trial for a stated - specific reason - such as the juror knows the parties or witnesses in a case. Each side has an unlimited number of challenges for cause.
Parole
Terrorism- Causes:
Atkins v. Virginia
Challenge for Cause
24. Review court
restitution
Runs juvenile hall
What is another term used to identify supreme courts
6th Amendment
25. Opening statements --> Prosecution always starts- statement --> Defense statement --> Prosecutors evidence (burden of proof lies on prosecution) --> defense evidence --> rebuttal (prosecution)
Aggravated Circumstances
Gideon Vs. Wainwright:
Trial Proceedures
Plea Bargain
26. Retribution - Restoration - deterrence - incapacitation - Rehabilitation
Balancing test
Kentucky vs. Louisiana
Criminal Complaint
Goals of punishment
27. Least used
contract attorneys
Gideon Vs. Wainwright:
aggravating circumstances
support for plea bargaining:
28. John Augustus
Restitution
'Discover'
The man known as the first probation officer?
Roper v. Simmons
29. The right to challenge a potential juror without discling the reason for the challenge. Used to eliminate juries individuals who although they express no bias are thought to be capable of swaying the jury in an undesirable way
Preliminary Hearing
Defense Attorney
Peremptory Challenges:
circunstancial evidence
30. Charges - Rights - Attorney - Plea Bail/No Bail
The man known as the first probation officer?
Arraignment
Homeland security
5 functions which take place at an arraignment
31. Plea bargaining is an essential component of the new admistration of justice and must be highly encouraged
indeterminate sentencing
Santobello Vs. New York
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
Gideon Vs. Wainwright:
32. Presumption of innocence- cannot be convicted unless the evidence is proved without a reasonable doubt
Suspended sentence
victim impact statements
Rules of evidence
Defense Attorney
33. (law) a conditional release from imprisonment that entitiles the person to serve the remainder of the sentence outside the prison as long as the terms of release are complied with
Trial Proceedures
Parole
How does an individual become a federal judge
indeterminate sentencing
34. A model of criminal punishment that encourages the rehabilitiation through the use of general and relatively unspecific sentences
indeterminate sentencing
Parole
Procunier vs. Martinez
Bailiff
35. Level 1 - 2 - and 3
aggravating circumstances
Prosecutor
3 level of security associated with prisons
Against Plea bargaining:
36. State legislature can establish almost any sentence as a punishment for a crime
Lockyer v. Andrade:
In Re Gault
Trial Jury
'Discover'
37. Procedural safeguards are necessary in revocation hearing involving parolees
4 types of courts found in the CA court system
Mitigating Circumstances
Hudson v. Palmer
Morissey v. Brewer
38. Any circumstances accompanying the commission of a crime that may justify a lighter sentence.
Procunier vs. Martinez
Mitigating Circumstances
Santobello Vs. New York
Stack Vs. Boyle
39. Process of negotiating an agreement w/ defendant - protectors - and the court
Trial Proceedures
6th Amendment
Plea Bargain
direct evidence
40. A period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials.
Different type of detention facilities and their function and who operates them
Names of the federal courts that make up the three tiers of the federal court system
Determinate sentencing
Venue
41. Less courts - less judges - prompt and final disposition of most cases - reduces time/cost in jail - reduces time spent free on bail- dangerous - serious offenders move more quickly into rehab - counseling - etc. - assures that the guilty will not be
Forfeiture laws
Plea Bargain
support for plea bargaining:
Small Courts Claim
42. 1 - Costs tax players less - 2 - Restitution can be made - 3 - Community work
Parens patriae
In Re Winship
Hudson v. Palmer
Ddvantages of probation and parole?
43. Group of jurors who were selected to tell if there's enough evidence or not
Place in correct order: Trial - Investigation - Crime - File criminal complaint - appeal - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - sentencing - arrest
direct evidence
Grand Jury
3 level of security associated with prisons
44. Pretrial phase of a law suit where each party can obtain any evidence from the opposing side
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
45. The in court use of victim or survivor supplied information supplied by sentencing authorities seeking to make an informed sentencing decision.
contract attorneys
Forfeiture laws
victim impact statements
Trial Proceedures
46. Mitigating - Lessens criminal responsibility and lightens sentence. Aggravating - factors that makes harsher sentence
Plea Bargain
Santobello Vs. New York
public defender
The difference between mitigating and aggravating circumstances as it pertains to sentencing
47. Pretrial proceedings at which the prosecutor must prove that a crime was committed and establish the probable guilt of the defendant.
Procunier vs. Martinez
Court Clerk
Determinate sentencing
Preliminary Hearing
48. Criminals recieve lighter/easier punishments- nota true sentence- endangers the correct legal outcome. It's coercion- bluffing- violation of human rights- prosecutors bluff and defendants plead to things they didn't do out of fear
Against Plea bargaining:
Parolve v. probation
Payne V. Tennessee
Terroism threat levels
49. 2008 - court held that the death penalty is not appropriate for a crime that does not include the taking of a life
Terrorism- Causes:
Enhancement
Presentence investigation
Kentucky vs. Louisiana
50. Requires interpretation of a judge or jury to reach conclusion based on what evidence indicates
baston v. kentucky
Atkins v. Virginia
circunstancial evidence
Gregg V. Georgia