SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
DSST Criminal Justice
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
dsst
,
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Group of jurors who were selected to tell if there's enough evidence or not
In Re Gault
Grand Jury
Trial Proceedures
Real evidence
2. Signifies the belief that the potential jurors are not representative of the community
Small Courts Claim
circunstancial evidence
Challenges to the array
Procunier vs. Martinez
3. 1974 - sanctions cannot be levied against inmates without appropriate due process
Habeus corpus
In Re Gault
Wolff v. McDaniel
Criminal Complaint
4. Prohibits peremptory challenges based on gender
Determinate sentencing
Recidivism:
Parens patriae
J.E.B. vs. Alabama
5. Plea bargaining is an essential component of the new admistration of justice and must be highly encouraged
public defender
Explain the difference between probation and parole
Stack Vs. Boyle
Santobello Vs. New York
6. Charges - Rights - Attorney - Plea Bail/No Bail
Terrorism- Causes:
5 functions which take place at an arraignment
Challenges to the array
restitution
7. Right to a speedy trial with unbiased jury - right to counsel
Mitigating Circumstances
6th Amendment
circunstancial evidence
Kentucky vs. Louisiana
8. Jury trial in civil cases
7th Amendment
Santobello Vs. New York
Trial Jury
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
9. A goal of criminal sentencing that attempts to make the victim whole again. a court requirement that an accused or convicted offender pay money or provide services to the victim of the cimre or provie services to the community
Enhancement
restitution
Place in correct order: Trial - Investigation - Crime - File criminal complaint - appeal - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - sentencing - arrest
circunstancial evidence
10. (law) a way of dealing with offenders without imprisoning them
Hudson v. Palmer
Court Jurisdiction
Balancing test
Probation
11. Underlying conditions--> international encironment --> state--> organizations --> leadership
Intermediate sentencing
Atkins v. Virginia
Terrorism- Causes:
victim impact statements
12. A model of criminal punishment in which an offender is given a fixed term of imprisonment that they may be reduced by good time or gain taim. all offendors convicted of the same crime will reciee the same punishment
Terroism threat levels
Probation
restitution
determinate sentencing
13. A legal document calling someone to court to answer an indictment
Arraignment
Stack Vs. Boyle
Balancing test
Defense Attorney
14. Grand Jury
5th Amendment
Real evidence
The difference between mitigating and aggravating circumstances as it pertains to sentencing
Court Jurisdiction
15. 2003 - illegal to execute mentally retarded
List three ways a person can be released from jail
Real evidence
Bailiff
Atkins v. Virginia
16. Geographic area of the court
Roper v. Simmons
Morissey v. Brewer
Preliminary Hearing
Venue
17. Retribution - Restoration - deterrence - incapacitation - Rehabilitation
In Re Gault
Homeland security
direct evidence
Goals of punishment
18. Probation
Cause challenges:
7th Amendment
Voir Dire
Runs juvenile hall
19. An officer appointed by the judges of the court to assist in managing the flow of cases through the court - maintain court records - handle financial matters - and provide other administrative support to the court.
Aggravated Circumstances
Prosecutor
Homeland security
Court Clerk
20. An officer of the court who is employed to execute writs and processes and make arrests etc.
aggravating circumstances
4 types of courts found in the CA court system
Bailiff
J.E.B. vs. Alabama
21. Excusing a juror from a trial for a stated - specific reason - such as the juror knows the parties or witnesses in a case. Each side has an unlimited number of challenges for cause.
Ddvantages of probation and parole?
6th Amendment
Challenge for Cause
Probation officer
22. Prohibits peremptory challenges based on race
circunstancial evidence
baston v. kentucky
Rules of evidence
What is another term used to identify supreme courts
23. A formal charge or accusation of a serious crime
Challenges to the array
Peremptory Challenges:
Cause challenges:
Indictment
24. Amnesty - Bail - good behavior
Peremptory Challenges:
Preliminary Hearing
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
List three ways a person can be released from jail
25. Run by the Federal government. Charged with protecting the nation's critical infrastructure against terrorist attack.
support for plea bargaining:
No lo contendre
Court Jurisdiction
Homeland security
26. A model of criminal punishment that encourages the rehabilitiation through the use of general and relatively unspecific sentences
Judge
indeterminate sentencing
Challenges to the array
Parens patriae
27. Made victim impact statements legal
Payne V. Tennessee
Wolff v. McDaniel
indeterminate sentencing
Gregg V. Georgia
28. A sum of money paid in compensation for loss or injury
Aggravated Circumstances
USA Patriot Act
Plea Bargain
Restitution
29. 1976 - Bifurcated trials - the guilt and innocent phase is separate from the punishment
aggravating circumstances
Recidivism:
Names of the federal courts that make up the three tiers of the federal court system
Gregg V. Georgia
30. Pretrial phase of a law suit where each party can obtain any evidence from the opposing side
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
31. Requires interpretation of a judge or jury to reach conclusion based on what evidence indicates
Hudson v. Palmer
Mitigating Circumstances
circunstancial evidence
Presentence investigation
32. Rules: no attorneys - maximum loss money 7 -500
Parens patriae
Restitution
Small Courts Claim
Court Clerk
33. Review court
What is another term used to identify supreme courts
In Re Gault
Goals of punishment
Gideon Vs. Wainwright:
34. Green- low Blue-guarded yellow-elevated orange- high red- severe
Indictment
Terroism threat levels
3 level of security associated with prisons
support for plea bargaining:
35. A period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials.
Enhancement
Place in correct order: Trial - Investigation - Crime - File criminal complaint - appeal - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - sentencing - arrest
Determinate sentencing
3 level of security associated with prisons
36. Court holds that bail must be reasonable but set at level to insure defendant's appearance at trial
'Discover'
Stack Vs. Boyle
Determinate sentencing
The difference between mitigating and aggravating circumstances as it pertains to sentencing
37. The authorized seizure of money - negotiable instruments - securities - or other things of value. Under federal antidrug laws - judicial representatives are authorized to seize all cash and goods.
Probation
Forfeiture laws
Roper v. Simmons
Balancing test
38. Decides guilt or innocence
Parole
Domestic terrorism
'Discover'
Trial Jury
39. U.S Districts Courts - U.S. Court of Appeal - U.S. Supreme Court
Real evidence
Preliminary Hearing
Names of the federal courts that make up the three tiers of the federal court system
Pre-sentence report
40. The right to challenge a potential juror without discling the reason for the challenge. Used to eliminate juries individuals who although they express no bias are thought to be capable of swaying the jury in an undesirable way
Determinate sentencing
USA Patriot Act
Peremptory Challenges:
Discovery:
41. 2005 - illegal to execute minors
Terroism threat levels
Roper v. Simmons
5th Amendment
Mitigating Circumstances
42. Investigation into the history of the person convicted of a crime to see if tehere are an extenuating circumstances which would ameliorate or increase sentence
Arraignment
Presentence investigation
Restitution
Venue
43. Fee based on state rate
circunstancial evidence
Challenge for Cause
The difference between consecutive and concurrent sentencing?
Court apointed council
44. Criminals recieve lighter/easier punishments- nota true sentence- endangers the correct legal outcome. It's coercion- bluffing- violation of human rights- prosecutors bluff and defendants plead to things they didn't do out of fear
Names of the federal courts that make up the three tiers of the federal court system
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
Mitigating Circumstances
Against Plea bargaining:
45. State legislature can establish almost any sentence as a punishment for a crime
Wolff v. McDaniel
Cruz v. beto
Lockyer v. Andrade:
3 level of security associated with prisons
46. A legal term for judges delaying of the sentence after they have been found guilty - in order to allow the defendant to perform a period of probation
Santobello Vs. New York
Balancing test
Place in correct order: Trial - Investigation - Crime - File criminal complaint - appeal - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - sentencing - arrest
Suspended sentence
47. Procedural safeguards are necessary in revocation hearing involving parolees
Challenges to the array
Against Plea bargaining:
Criminal Complaint
Morissey v. Brewer
48. Level 1 - 2 - and 3
Cruz v. beto
Domestic terrorism
Terrorism- Causes:
3 level of security associated with prisons
49. Least used
Procunier vs. Martinez
contract attorneys
How does an individual become a federal judge
Gregg V. Georgia
50. Prisoners challenged the constitutionality of state regulations covering censorship of prisoner mail on the grounds that they violated the prisoners free-speech rights. REstrictions on speech must be justified as the necessity for security and the ru
Real evidence
public defender
Procunier vs. Martinez
Stack Vs. Boyle