SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
DSST Criminal Justice
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
dsst
,
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The right to challenge a potential juror without discling the reason for the challenge. Used to eliminate juries individuals who although they express no bias are thought to be capable of swaying the jury in an undesirable way
Gregg V. Georgia
Voir Dire
Peremptory Challenges:
In Re Gault
2. Circumstances relating to the commission of a crime that make it more grave than average instance of that crime
aggravating circumstances
7th Amendment
Cruz v. beto
5th Amendment
3. Circumstances relating to the commission of a crime that may be considered to reduce the blameworthiness of the defendant
In Re Gault
'Discover'
mitigating circumstances
Stack Vs. Boyle
4. 2008 - court held that the death penalty is not appropriate for a crime that does not include the taking of a life
Arraignment
Recidivism:
Santobello Vs. New York
Kentucky vs. Louisiana
5. A goal of criminal sentencing that attempts to make the victim whole again. a court requirement that an accused or convicted offender pay money or provide services to the victim of the cimre or provie services to the community
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
Venue
restitution
Rules of evidence
6. Group of jurors who were selected to tell if there's enough evidence or not
How does an individual become a federal judge
Grand Jury
Criminal Complaint
Domestic terrorism
7. 1976 - Bifurcated trials - the guilt and innocent phase is separate from the punishment
Gregg V. Georgia
Lockyer v. Andrade:
Restitution
support for plea bargaining:
8. The act of a person repeating of an undesirable behavior after thay have either experienced negative consequences of that behavior or have been treated or trained to extinguish that behavior.
Real evidence
In Re Gault
Atkins v. Virginia
Recidivism:
9. A prisoner has no reasoable expectations of privacy in his prison cell and no protections against what would otherwise be unreasonable searches 4th amendment
Terrorism- Causes:
'Discover'
Procunier vs. Martinez
Hudson v. Palmer
10. The in court use of victim or survivor supplied information supplied by sentencing authorities seeking to make an informed sentencing decision.
How does an individual become a federal judge
victim impact statements
Presentence investigation
Bailiff
11. Retribution - Restoration - deterrence - incapacitation - Rehabilitation
Kentucky vs. Louisiana
How does an individual become a federal judge
Goals of punishment
Probation
12. Prohibits peremptory challenges based on gender
J.E.B. vs. Alabama
Parens patriae
Against Plea bargaining:
Restitution
13. Crime - Investigation - arrest - file criminal complaint - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - trial - sentencing - appeal
Venue
5th Amendment
Balancing test
Place in correct order: Trial - Investigation - Crime - File criminal complaint - appeal - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - sentencing - arrest
14. A principle developed by the courts and applied to the corrections arena by pell v. procunier that attempts to weigh the rights of an individual as guaranteed by the Constituion - against the authority of states of make laws or to otherwise restrict
Arraignment
Court Jurisdiction
Balancing test
Atkins v. Virginia
15. Run by the Federal government. Charged with protecting the nation's critical infrastructure against terrorist attack.
Cruz v. beto
6th Amendment
Homeland security
Cause challenges:
16. Jury selection process of questioning prospective jurors - to ascertain their qualifications and determine any basis for challenge.
Roper v. Simmons
Probation officer
Voir Dire
direct evidence
17. 2005 - illegal to execute minors
Court Clerk
direct evidence
Roper v. Simmons
The difference between consecutive and concurrent sentencing?
18. Grand Jury
5th Amendment
List three ways a person can be released from jail
Peremptory Challenges:
baston v. kentucky
19. Court holds that bail must be reasonable but set at level to insure defendant's appearance at trial
Court Clerk
Challenge for Cause
Stack Vs. Boyle
Court apointed council
20. The lawyer representing the defendant
What is another term used to identify supreme courts
Defense Attorney
Trial Proceedures
public defender
21. A model of criminal punishment in which an offender is given a fixed term of imprisonment that they may be reduced by good time or gain taim. all offendors convicted of the same crime will reciee the same punishment
Court Jurisdiction
The difference between consecutive and concurrent sentencing?
determinate sentencing
victim impact statements
22. Trial Court - superior court - pellet superior court - supreme court
4 types of courts found in the CA court system
Roper v. Simmons
How does an individual become a federal judge
Small Courts Claim
23. Excusing a juror from a trial for a stated - specific reason - such as the juror knows the parties or witnesses in a case. Each side has an unlimited number of challenges for cause.
Criminal Complaint
Explain the difference between probation and parole
Procunier vs. Martinez
Challenge for Cause
24. Review court
7th Amendment
Challenge for Cause
What is another term used to identify supreme courts
Parolve v. probation
25. In pre-trial in which each party can obtain evidence from opposing party
Cruz v. beto
Parole
Discovery:
'Discover'
26. The authorized seizure of money - negotiable instruments - securities - or other things of value. Under federal antidrug laws - judicial representatives are authorized to seize all cash and goods.
Court Jurisdiction
Peremptory Challenges:
5 functions which take place at an arraignment
Forfeiture laws
27. Probation is a sentencing usually given instead of jail but not always - parole is a conditional release from prison
Kentucky vs. Louisiana
Gregg V. Georgia
Explain the difference between probation and parole
In Re Gault
28. An officer appointed by the judges of the court to assist in managing the flow of cases through the court - maintain court records - handle financial matters - and provide other administrative support to the court.
Court Clerk
Grand Jury
Indictment
Trial Proceedures
29. Decides guilt or innocence
Trial Proceedures
Wolff v. McDaniel
Trial Jury
Rules of evidence
30. Most widely used goal is to individualize punishment - inmates eligible for parole after serving minimum
Procunier vs. Martinez
Preliminary Hearing
Challenges to the array
Intermediate sentencing
31. A model of criminal punishment that encourages the rehabilitiation through the use of general and relatively unspecific sentences
List three ways a person can be released from jail
indeterminate sentencing
Mitigating Circumstances
aggravating circumstances
32. State legislature can establish almost any sentence as a punishment for a crime
6th Amendment
Prosecutor
Habeus corpus
Lockyer v. Andrade:
33. Holding Cells-Convenience-Many law enforcement agencies - County Jail-Holds all level of offenders-sheriffs department Juvenile Hall-criminals under 18-probation department
Place in correct order: Trial - Investigation - Crime - File criminal complaint - appeal - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - sentencing - arrest
Different type of detention facilities and their function and who operates them
Aggravated Circumstances
Gideon Vs. Wainwright:
34. Circumstances - facts - or situations that result in a harsher sentence
Names of the federal courts that make up the three tiers of the federal court system
Cruz v. beto
Aggravated Circumstances
Challenge for Cause
35. A court that hears a case the first time it is tried in court. A trial court is a court of original jurisdiction.
USA Patriot Act
Against Plea bargaining:
Court Jurisdiction
Domestic terrorism
36. Any circumstances accompanying the commission of a crime that may justify a lighter sentence.
Mitigating Circumstances
In Re Winship
Trial Jury
Lockyer v. Andrade:
37. Jury trial in civil cases
The difference between mitigating and aggravating circumstances as it pertains to sentencing
J.E.B. vs. Alabama
Challenges to the array
7th Amendment
38. Inmates have to be given a reasonable opportunity to pursue their religious faiths - also visits can be banned is such visits constitute threats to society
Challenge for Cause
Cruz v. beto
Stack Vs. Boyle
Homeland security
39. Green- low Blue-guarded yellow-elevated orange- high red- severe
victim impact statements
Parolve v. probation
Terroism threat levels
restitution
40. Requires interpretation of a judge or jury to reach conclusion based on what evidence indicates
Parolve v. probation
circunstancial evidence
public defender
No lo contendre
41. An officer of the court who is employed to execute writs and processes and make arrests etc.
Bailiff
indeterminate sentencing
In Re Winship
Venue
42. Rules: no attorneys - maximum loss money 7 -500
Different type of detention facilities and their function and who operates them
Small Courts Claim
Cruz v. beto
Gideon Vs. Wainwright:
43. The unlawful use of force or violence by an individual or a group that is based and operatues entirely within the U.S. and its territories - acts without foreign direction and directs its activites agaits elements of the us government or population
The difference between mitigating and aggravating circumstances as it pertains to sentencing
Wolff v. McDaniel
Domestic terrorism
Mitigating Circumstances
44. Evidence that consists of physical material or traces of physical activity
Parolve v. probation
Suspended sentence
Real evidence
Challenges to the array
45. Charges - Rights - Attorney - Plea Bail/No Bail
baston v. kentucky
Habeus corpus
The difference between consecutive and concurrent sentencing?
5 functions which take place at an arraignment
46. It is the receiving point for CA department of corrections
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
Voir Dire
Recidivism:
Court Jurisdiction
47. Level 1 - 2 - and 3
J.E.B. vs. Alabama
Procunier vs. Martinez
3 level of security associated with prisons
4 types of courts found in the CA court system
48. Criminals recieve lighter/easier punishments- nota true sentence- endangers the correct legal outcome. It's coercion- bluffing- violation of human rights- prosecutors bluff and defendants plead to things they didn't do out of fear
Court apointed council
Rules of evidence
Against Plea bargaining:
Domestic terrorism
49. Pretrial proceedings at which the prosecutor must prove that a crime was committed and establish the probable guilt of the defendant.
Kentucky vs. Louisiana
Probation officer
In Re Gault
Preliminary Hearing
50. A writ whcih requires a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court. This ensure that a prisoner can be released form unlawful detention.
Probation
In Re Winship
J.E.B. vs. Alabama
Habeus corpus