SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
DSST Criminal Justice
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
dsst
,
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. John Augustus
USA Patriot Act
The man known as the first probation officer?
Names of the federal courts that make up the three tiers of the federal court system
Terroism threat levels
2. Geographic area of the court
Prisoner rights:
determinate sentencing
Explain the difference between probation and parole
Venue
3. Full time- salaried
public defender
Challenge for Cause
mitigating circumstances
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
4. Things that add on to sentencing
Enhancement
aggravating circumstances
Parole
Venue
5. A fedral law enacted in response to terrorist attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon on September 11 -2001. The law officially titled the Uniting and Strengthening America by providing Appropriate Tools Required to intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act -
USA Patriot Act
No lo contendre
Homeland security
Ddvantages of probation and parole?
6. A goal of criminal sentencing that attempts to make the victim whole again. a court requirement that an accused or convicted offender pay money or provide services to the victim of the cimre or provie services to the community
restitution
Santobello Vs. New York
aggravating circumstances
The man known as the first probation officer?
7. Mitigating - Lessens criminal responsibility and lightens sentence. Aggravating - factors that makes harsher sentence
Probation
What is another term used to identify supreme courts
The difference between mitigating and aggravating circumstances as it pertains to sentencing
Mitigating Circumstances
8. Consecutive - one after the other and Concurrent is at same time
Judge
Terrorism- Causes:
Domestic terrorism
The difference between consecutive and concurrent sentencing?
9. 2003 - illegal to execute mentally retarded
Atkins v. Virginia
Different type of detention facilities and their function and who operates them
Judge
Trial Jury
10. A legal document calling someone to court to answer an indictment
Against Plea bargaining:
Determinate sentencing
Arraignment
Goals of punishment
11. A legal term for judges delaying of the sentence after they have been found guilty - in order to allow the defendant to perform a period of probation
Preliminary Hearing
Habeus corpus
Payne V. Tennessee
Suspended sentence
12. A prisoner has no reasoable expectations of privacy in his prison cell and no protections against what would otherwise be unreasonable searches 4th amendment
Arraignment
Payne V. Tennessee
Hudson v. Palmer
Morissey v. Brewer
13. A court that hears a case the first time it is tried in court. A trial court is a court of original jurisdiction.
Court apointed council
Defense Attorney
Court Jurisdiction
Atkins v. Virginia
14. Most widely used goal is to individualize punishment - inmates eligible for parole after serving minimum
The difference between consecutive and concurrent sentencing?
Parolve v. probation
Intermediate sentencing
Prosecutor
15. Grand Jury
Venue
5th Amendment
Parolve v. probation
Hudson v. Palmer
16. 2005 - illegal to execute minors
Arraignment
Indictment
Morissey v. Brewer
Roper v. Simmons
17. A principle developed by the courts and applied to the corrections arena by pell v. procunier that attempts to weigh the rights of an individual as guaranteed by the Constituion - against the authority of states of make laws or to otherwise restrict
J.E.B. vs. Alabama
Balancing test
Pre-sentence report
Hudson v. Palmer
18. Made victim impact statements legal
Voir Dire
Suspended sentence
Peremptory Challenges:
Payne V. Tennessee
19. The unlawful use of force or violence by an individual or a group that is based and operatues entirely within the U.S. and its territories - acts without foreign direction and directs its activites agaits elements of the us government or population
Domestic terrorism
Judge
Real evidence
The man known as the first probation officer?
20. Jury selection process of questioning prospective jurors - to ascertain their qualifications and determine any basis for challenge.
Aggravated Circumstances
Challenge for Cause
Forfeiture laws
Voir Dire
21. A writ whcih requires a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court. This ensure that a prisoner can be released form unlawful detention.
Enhancement
Habeus corpus
Different type of detention facilities and their function and who operates them
Bailiff
22. Signifies the belief that the potential jurors are not representative of the community
Indictment
Challenges to the array
In Re Winship
4 types of courts found in the CA court system
23. The right to challenge a potential juror without discling the reason for the challenge. Used to eliminate juries individuals who although they express no bias are thought to be capable of swaying the jury in an undesirable way
Peremptory Challenges:
Domestic terrorism
Court apointed council
Gideon Vs. Wainwright:
24. Excusing a juror from a trial for a stated - specific reason - such as the juror knows the parties or witnesses in a case. Each side has an unlimited number of challenges for cause.
Real evidence
In Re Gault
How does an individual become a federal judge
Challenge for Cause
25. Right to a speedy trial with unbiased jury - right to counsel
Habeus corpus
Morissey v. Brewer
Ddvantages of probation and parole?
6th Amendment
26. Crime - Investigation - arrest - file criminal complaint - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - trial - sentencing - appeal
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
Trial Proceedures
Place in correct order: Trial - Investigation - Crime - File criminal complaint - appeal - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - sentencing - arrest
Prisoner rights:
27. In pre-trial in which each party can obtain evidence from opposing party
Grand Jury
Presentence investigation
Place in correct order: Trial - Investigation - Crime - File criminal complaint - appeal - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - sentencing - arrest
Discovery:
28. Less courts - less judges - prompt and final disposition of most cases - reduces time/cost in jail - reduces time spent free on bail- dangerous - serious offenders move more quickly into rehab - counseling - etc. - assures that the guilty will not be
support for plea bargaining:
Stack Vs. Boyle
Mitigating Circumstances
3 level of security associated with prisons
29. A written statement of the essential facts making up the offense charged
support for plea bargaining:
Morissey v. Brewer
Restitution
Criminal Complaint
30. I do not wish to contend- has the same effect as a guilty plea-becomes a plea bargain
Santobello Vs. New York
Place in correct order: Trial - Investigation - Crime - File criminal complaint - appeal - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - sentencing - arrest
No lo contendre
Grand Jury
31. Underlying conditions--> international encironment --> state--> organizations --> leadership
Gregg V. Georgia
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
Terrorism- Causes:
Challenge for Cause
32. 1974 - sanctions cannot be levied against inmates without appropriate due process
Rules of evidence
Wolff v. McDaniel
'Discover'
Court Jurisdiction
33. Physical material or traces of physical activity
Wolff v. McDaniel
'Discover'
Place in correct order: Trial - Investigation - Crime - File criminal complaint - appeal - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - sentencing - arrest
Real evidence
34. Inmates have to be given a reasonable opportunity to pursue their religious faiths - also visits can be banned is such visits constitute threats to society
Cruz v. beto
Bailiff
aggravating circumstances
USA Patriot Act
35. (law) a conditional release from imprisonment that entitiles the person to serve the remainder of the sentence outside the prison as long as the terms of release are complied with
How does an individual become a federal judge
Parole
Intermediate sentencing
Forfeiture laws
36. A period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials.
Criminal Complaint
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
Determinate sentencing
Cruz v. beto
37. Criminals recieve lighter/easier punishments- nota true sentence- endangers the correct legal outcome. It's coercion- bluffing- violation of human rights- prosecutors bluff and defendants plead to things they didn't do out of fear
Small Courts Claim
Against Plea bargaining:
In Re Winship
Challenges to the array
38. Rules: no attorneys - maximum loss money 7 -500
Determinate sentencing
How does an individual become a federal judge
Small Courts Claim
Recidivism:
39. A common law principle that allows the state to assume a parental role and to take custody of a child when he or she becomes delinquent - is abandoned or is need of care taht the natural parents are unable or unwilling to provide
Judge
7th Amendment
Parens patriae
'Discover'
40. State legislature can establish almost any sentence as a punishment for a crime
Plea Bargain
Lockyer v. Andrade:
The difference between consecutive and concurrent sentencing?
Runs juvenile hall
41. Level 1 - 2 - and 3
aggravating circumstances
3 level of security associated with prisons
Morissey v. Brewer
Grand Jury
42. Evidence that if believed proves a fact- eyewitnesses - videtapes - ec.
support for plea bargaining:
Rules of evidence
direct evidence
Aggravated Circumstances
43. Held that when a juvenile is charged with an act taht would be a crime if committed by an adult - every element of the offense must be proved beyond reasonable doubt
Intermediate sentencing
Parolve v. probation
In Re Winship
Cause challenges:
44. 1963 - extended the right to appointed counsel for indigents in all felony cases
Kentucky vs. Louisiana
Gideon Vs. Wainwright:
Forfeiture laws
Plea Bargain
45. Probation is a sentencing usually given instead of jail but not always - parole is a conditional release from prison
Atkins v. Virginia
victim impact statements
Explain the difference between probation and parole
3 level of security associated with prisons
46. 1 - Costs tax players less - 2 - Restitution can be made - 3 - Community work
Ddvantages of probation and parole?
Peremptory Challenges:
Real evidence
Payne V. Tennessee
47. Retain 1st amendment rights that are not inconsistent with his status as a prisoner- have rights - much the same as people who are not incarcerated. Conditional rather than absolute rights. The balancing test.
Prisoner rights:
aggravating circumstances
Terrorism- Causes:
Court apointed council
48. Evidence that consists of physical material or traces of physical activity
Names of the federal courts that make up the three tiers of the federal court system
USA Patriot Act
Real evidence
Preliminary Hearing
49. Procedural safeguards are necessary in revocation hearing involving parolees
Probation
Rules of evidence
Restitution
Morissey v. Brewer
50. Held that juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults - such as the right to timely notification of the cahrges - the right to confront witnesses - the right against self-incr
Wolff v. McDaniel
Indictment
support for plea bargaining:
In Re Gault