SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
DSST Criminal Justice
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
dsst
,
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Geographic area of the court
Pre-sentence report
Venue
In Re Winship
Cruz v. beto
2. Level 1 - 2 - and 3
3 level of security associated with prisons
Defense Attorney
Real evidence
Indictment
3. Evidence that consists of physical material or traces of physical activity
The man known as the first probation officer?
restitution
Real evidence
3 level of security associated with prisons
4. Retain 1st amendment rights that are not inconsistent with his status as a prisoner- have rights - much the same as people who are not incarcerated. Conditional rather than absolute rights. The balancing test.
Procunier vs. Martinez
Homeland security
Real evidence
Prisoner rights:
5. Things that add on to sentencing
Runs juvenile hall
contract attorneys
'Discover'
Enhancement
6. Less courts - less judges - prompt and final disposition of most cases - reduces time/cost in jail - reduces time spent free on bail- dangerous - serious offenders move more quickly into rehab - counseling - etc. - assures that the guilty will not be
Balancing test
support for plea bargaining:
Recidivism:
Prisoner rights:
7. 1974 - sanctions cannot be levied against inmates without appropriate due process
The difference between mitigating and aggravating circumstances as it pertains to sentencing
How does an individual become a federal judge
Recidivism:
Wolff v. McDaniel
8. Process of negotiating an agreement w/ defendant - protectors - and the court
Habeus corpus
Plea Bargain
Trial Proceedures
Presentence investigation
9. Underlying conditions--> international encironment --> state--> organizations --> leadership
Terrorism- Causes:
How does an individual become a federal judge
Small Courts Claim
Hudson v. Palmer
10. Consecutive - one after the other and Concurrent is at same time
Voir Dire
The difference between consecutive and concurrent sentencing?
aggravating circumstances
Court Clerk
11. A fedral law enacted in response to terrorist attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon on September 11 -2001. The law officially titled the Uniting and Strengthening America by providing Appropriate Tools Required to intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act -
5 functions which take place at an arraignment
USA Patriot Act
Parolve v. probation
Payne V. Tennessee
12. 2005 - illegal to execute minors
Roper v. Simmons
Venue
Indictment
6th Amendment
13. I do not wish to contend- has the same effect as a guilty plea-becomes a plea bargain
Parens patriae
No lo contendre
Peremptory Challenges:
Procunier vs. Martinez
14. Fee based on state rate
Judge
Lockyer v. Andrade:
Names of the federal courts that make up the three tiers of the federal court system
Court apointed council
15. A legal document calling someone to court to answer an indictment
Habeus corpus
public defender
Against Plea bargaining:
Arraignment
16. U.S Districts Courts - U.S. Court of Appeal - U.S. Supreme Court
Pre-sentence report
Names of the federal courts that make up the three tiers of the federal court system
Cruz v. beto
'Discover'
17. Excusing a juror from a trial for a stated - specific reason - such as the juror knows the parties or witnesses in a case. Each side has an unlimited number of challenges for cause.
Suspended sentence
Terrorism- Causes:
Rules of evidence
Challenge for Cause
18. Most widely used goal is to individualize punishment - inmates eligible for parole after serving minimum
restitution
Intermediate sentencing
Aggravated Circumstances
5th Amendment
19. Investigation into the history of the person convicted of a crime to see if tehere are an extenuating circumstances which would ameliorate or increase sentence
Rules of evidence
Presentence investigation
Bailiff
Grand Jury
20. Nominated by the President
Santobello Vs. New York
Real evidence
How does an individual become a federal judge
Gideon Vs. Wainwright:
21. Not qualified - convicted felon - under indictment - can't read or write - bias - served ongrand jury - insane - etc. May arise during voir dire exmination
Cause challenges:
Determinate sentencing
Arraignment
The man known as the first probation officer?
22. 2003 - illegal to execute mentally retarded
Hudson v. Palmer
Real evidence
Atkins v. Virginia
Presentence investigation
23. Rules: no attorneys - maximum loss money 7 -500
Against Plea bargaining:
Small Courts Claim
Prisoner rights:
Judge
24. Plea bargaining is an essential component of the new admistration of justice and must be highly encouraged
circunstancial evidence
Santobello Vs. New York
Lockyer v. Andrade:
determinate sentencing
25. Held that juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults - such as the right to timely notification of the cahrges - the right to confront witnesses - the right against self-incr
In Re Gault
7th Amendment
Cruz v. beto
Prisoner rights:
26. Circumstances relating to the commission of a crime that make it more grave than average instance of that crime
Runs juvenile hall
aggravating circumstances
In Re Gault
How does an individual become a federal judge
27. Requires interpretation of a judge or jury to reach conclusion based on what evidence indicates
Gideon Vs. Wainwright:
How does an individual become a federal judge
circunstancial evidence
Aggravated Circumstances
28. Opening statements --> Prosecution always starts- statement --> Defense statement --> Prosecutors evidence (burden of proof lies on prosecution) --> defense evidence --> rebuttal (prosecution)
Judge
Trial Proceedures
Against Plea bargaining:
Court Jurisdiction
29. In pre-trial in which each party can obtain evidence from opposing party
Trial Jury
Discovery:
Cruz v. beto
Aggravated Circumstances
30. A legal term for judges delaying of the sentence after they have been found guilty - in order to allow the defendant to perform a period of probation
No lo contendre
Enhancement
4 types of courts found in the CA court system
Suspended sentence
31. Least used
Court apointed council
5 functions which take place at an arraignment
Domestic terrorism
contract attorneys
32. Held that when a juvenile is charged with an act taht would be a crime if committed by an adult - every element of the offense must be proved beyond reasonable doubt
The difference between mitigating and aggravating circumstances as it pertains to sentencing
In Re Winship
Place in correct order: Trial - Investigation - Crime - File criminal complaint - appeal - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - sentencing - arrest
5 functions which take place at an arraignment
33. A government official who conducts criminal prosecutions on behalf of the state
Lockyer v. Andrade:
Procunier vs. Martinez
Prosecutor
Court apointed council
34. A principle developed by the courts and applied to the corrections arena by pell v. procunier that attempts to weigh the rights of an individual as guaranteed by the Constituion - against the authority of states of make laws or to otherwise restrict
Balancing test
Against Plea bargaining:
aggravating circumstances
Aggravated Circumstances
35. A court that hears a case the first time it is tried in court. A trial court is a court of original jurisdiction.
Ddvantages of probation and parole?
Restitution
How does an individual become a federal judge
Court Jurisdiction
36. A formal charge or accusation of a serious crime
Domestic terrorism
What is another term used to identify supreme courts
Indictment
Presentence investigation
37. A writ whcih requires a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court. This ensure that a prisoner can be released form unlawful detention.
Habeus corpus
mitigating circumstances
Plea Bargain
Parole
38. Right to a speedy trial with unbiased jury - right to counsel
6th Amendment
victim impact statements
Gideon Vs. Wainwright:
Prosecutor
39. Run by the Federal government. Charged with protecting the nation's critical infrastructure against terrorist attack.
Court Jurisdiction
Homeland security
Probation officer
Defense Attorney
40. Pretrial proceedings at which the prosecutor must prove that a crime was committed and establish the probable guilt of the defendant.
indeterminate sentencing
Preliminary Hearing
3 level of security associated with prisons
Indictment
41. An officer of the court who is employed to execute writs and processes and make arrests etc.
Grand Jury
Habeus corpus
Court Clerk
Bailiff
42. Inmates have to be given a reasonable opportunity to pursue their religious faiths - also visits can be banned is such visits constitute threats to society
Ddvantages of probation and parole?
5th Amendment
Function of the Reception Centers within the CA department of Corrections?
Cruz v. beto
43. Jury selection process of questioning prospective jurors - to ascertain their qualifications and determine any basis for challenge.
Recidivism:
What is another term used to identify supreme courts
Voir Dire
mitigating circumstances
44. Decides guilt or innocence
What is another term used to identify supreme courts
How does an individual become a federal judge
Roper v. Simmons
Trial Jury
45. Criminals recieve lighter/easier punishments- nota true sentence- endangers the correct legal outcome. It's coercion- bluffing- violation of human rights- prosecutors bluff and defendants plead to things they didn't do out of fear
Gregg V. Georgia
Against Plea bargaining:
Cruz v. beto
Court Clerk
46. Parole is earned - probation is part of a sentence
Trial Proceedures
Parolve v. probation
Presentence investigation
Terroism threat levels
47. 1976 - Bifurcated trials - the guilt and innocent phase is separate from the punishment
aggravating circumstances
Balancing test
Habeus corpus
Gregg V. Georgia
48. The unlawful use of force or violence by an individual or a group that is based and operatues entirely within the U.S. and its territories - acts without foreign direction and directs its activites agaits elements of the us government or population
Domestic terrorism
5 functions which take place at an arraignment
Arraignment
Procunier vs. Martinez
49. Signifies the belief that the potential jurors are not representative of the community
Challenges to the array
Plea Bargain
Atkins v. Virginia
Place in correct order: Trial - Investigation - Crime - File criminal complaint - appeal - first arraignment - preliminary hearing - second arraignment - sentencing - arrest
50. A goal of criminal sentencing that attempts to make the victim whole again. a court requirement that an accused or convicted offender pay money or provide services to the victim of the cimre or provie services to the community
public defender
Homeland security
Procunier vs. Martinez
restitution