SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
GRE Psychology: Measurement And Methodology
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
gre
,
psychology
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Tell you the average extent to which scores were different from the mean - if average standard deviation is large - then scores were highly dispersed
F-scale or F-ratio
One-way ANOVA
standard deviation (calculation)
External validity (+types)
2. Tests the effects of two independent variables or treatment conditions at once
Variability
range
Two-way ANOVA
Aptitude tests
3. Whether scores on a new measure correlate with other measures known to test the same construct; cross validation process
Illusory correlation
Rorschach Inkblot Test
Concurrent validity
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-R)
4. Whether test really taps abstract concept being measured
interval variables
Construct validity
frequency polygon
Concurrent validity
5. Measured by the same individual taking the same test more than once
Intelligence
Test-retest reliability
One-way ANOVA
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-R)
6. Tests whether at least 2 groups co-vary - can adjust for preexisting differences between groups
Alfred Binet
Spearman r correlation coefficient
median
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)
7. Originally to determine mental illness - now for personality; more clinical than CPI; 550 T/F/unsure questions (e.g. 'I would like to ride a horse'); discriminates between disorders; high validity because highly discriminatory items and 3 validity sc
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
dependent variable
Selective attrition
Reactance
8. Created to determine whether a person feels responsible for things that happen (internal) or no control over events in life (external)
Q-sort/measure
Linear regression
Internal-External Locus of Control Scale
Chi-square test
9. Not IQ - It is unlikely IQ captures all facets of it
Illusory correlation
cohort-sequential design
Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory
Intelligence
10. Experimenter bias; researchers see what they want to see; minimized in double-blind
Statistical regression
predictive value
Rosenthal effect
Learn the shape of different distributions
11. Compares 2 groups of people at the same time point
standard error of mean
Scientific approach
between subject
Face validity
12. Analyses how a large group responded to each item on the measure; weeds out problematic questions with low discriminatory value; increases internal consistency
Item analysis (reliability)
Two-way ANOVA
Test-retest reliability
Julian Rotter
13. Organize data by showing it in a meaningful way; do not allow conclusions to be drawn beyond the sample; percentiles - frequency distributions - graphs - measures of central tendency - variability
Face validity
Descriptive statistics (+types)
cohort effect
Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI)
14. Anything that is measured such as height or depression score on a depression scale
Crystallized intelligence
Continuous data
cross-sectional design
Achievement tests
15. Not simple and linear - looks like a curved line - ex: arousal and perfomance - high A --> low P - Low A --> low P - medium A --> high P
Linear regression
Descriptive statistics (+types)
Curvilinear relationship
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
16. Like a histogram except that the vertical bars do not touch - various columns are separated by space
Content validity
bar graph
Lie detector tests
Factorial analysis of variance
17. Transformation of a z-score - mean is 50 and the SD is 10 - T=10(Z)+50
Reactance
placebo
T-score
Frequency distributions (+variables)
18. The approach to construct assessment instruments - involves selection of items that can discriminate between various groups; responses determine if he is like a particular group or not; e.g. Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory
Empirical-keying or criterion-keying approach
Fluid intelligence
Central Tendency (types and distribution differences)
Rotter Incomplete Sentence Blank
19. Neither the subject nor the experimenter know whether the subject is assigned to the treatment or the control group
double-blind experiment
Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
Alpha levels
Type I and II errors
20. Knowing how to do something
mode
Learn the shape of different distributions
Projective tests (+types)
Fluid intelligence
21. Interest in the effect of independent variable on the dependent variable - often manipulated by applying it in experimental or treatment condition and withholding it from control condition
Content validity
IQ Binet'S equation
Meta-analysis
independent variable
22. Aims to match demographic characteristics to population (i.e. 50% female - etc)
Factorial analysis of variance
stratified sampling
random sampling
Central Tendency (types and distribution differences)
23. Used when equivalent one cannot be isolated
Nonequivalent control group
Concurrent validity
Scientific approach
Null hypothesis
24. When subjects do and say what they think puts them in a favorable light -ex: reporting they are not racist even if they really are
social desirability
cohort-sequential design
Q-sort/measure
T-score
25. Most commonly used for adults 16+ - organized by subtests with subscales and identify problem areas; current is WAIS-IV
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)
Julian Rotter
placebo
independent variable
26. Allows own answer: expression of conflicts - needs - impulses; content interpreted by administrator - some more objective than others; Rorschach Inkblot Test - Thematic Apperception Test - Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration (P-F) Study - Word Association
standard deviation (calculation)
Projective tests (+types)
statistically significant
Demand characteristic
27. The effect that might result when a group is born and raised in a particular time period
Discrete data
ratio variables
cohort effect
T-test
28. Naturalistic setting - less control over environment than in lab; generates more hypotheses than able to prove
Longitudinal design
External validity (+types)
Illusory correlation
Field study
29. Notable for cross-cultural application and simple directions - to make the best picture of a man - scored based on detail and accuracy - not artistic talent
Goodenough Draw-A-Man Test
mode
Concurrent validity
Nonequivalent control group
30. Personality test from Jung'S theory; 93 questions 2 answers each; 4-letter personality type - each letter 1 of 2 possible opposing characteristics: Introverted vs. Extraverted - Sensing vs. Intuition - Feeling vs. Thinking - and - Judgment vs. Percep
Rosenthal effect
Chi-square test
Myers-Brigg Type Indicator (MBTI)
cohort-sequential design
31. Assess extent interests and strengths match those found by professionals in a particular job field
Vocational tests
placebo
Split-half reliability
between subject
32. Measures the extent to which items in a measure 'hang together' and test the same thing
Internal validity
Item analysis (reliability)
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
statistically significant
33. Capable of showing order and pacing because equal spaces lie between the values - do not include real zero - ex: temperature
interval variables
dependent variable
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-R)
Bayley Scales of Infant Development
34. Personality measure for 'normal' / less clinical groups than MMPI - by Harrison Gough
statistics
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-R)
California Personality Inventory (CPI)
Longitudinal design
35. Rosenthal effect; researchers see what they want to see; minimized in double-blind
Experimenter bias
Internal validity
cohort effect
Demand characteristic
36. Revised Binet'S version - used with children - organized by age level - Best known predictor of future academic achievement
Acquiescence
IQ Binet'S equation
Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
placebo effect
37. Measure how well you know a subject - measure past learning
between subject
Vocational tests
Achievement tests
Anne Anastasi
38. The hypothesis that no real differences or pattern exist
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
mental age
Construct validity
Null hypothesis
39. Attitude change in response to feeling that options are limited; e.g. dislike experiment and intentionally behaving unnaturally - or being set on a certain flavour of ice cream as soon as told it is sold out
Crystallized intelligence
interval variables
Reactance
independent variable
40. Structured - do not allow own answers; more objective than projective tests; not completely objective because most self-reported; Q-sort - Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) - California Personality Inventory (CPI) - Myers-Brigg Type
Validity (+types)
Objective tests (+types)
mental age
cross-sectional design
41. Different subjects of different ages are compared - faster - easier
External validity (+types)
cross-sectional design
Concurrent validity
median
42. If it is significant - same finding can be generalized to the population - use test of significant to reject null hypothesis
statistically significant
cross-sectional design
Central Tendency (types and distribution differences)
Alfred Binet
43. Birth order vs. intelligence; the older - the more intelligent; the more children - the less intelligent; the greater spacing - the more intelligent
Spearman r correlation coefficient
Robert Zajonc
Statistical regression
Linear regression
44. When subject behave differently just because they thing that they have received the treatment substance or condition
Charles Spearmen
placebo effect
variance and standard deviation
standard error of mean
45. 31 cards (1 blank and 30 pictures) with interpersonal scenes (2 people facing each other); subject tells story about each which reveals aspects of personality; often measure need for achievement; interpreting terms include needs - press - personology
Anne Anastasi
frequency polygon
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
Illusory correlation
46. Internal-External Locus of Control Scale
Julian Rotter
Q-sort/measure
Criterion-referenced tests
statistics
47. Includes: testable hypothesis - reproducible experiment - operationalized definition (observable and measurable)
California Personality Inventory (CPI)
Concurrent validity
Reactance
Scientific approach
48. Revised Binet scale to Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale; also studied gifted children - those with higher IQs better adjusted
stratified sampling
Lewis Terman
cohort effect
Aptitude tests
49. When people agree with opposing statements; giving tacit agreement
predictive value
Acquiescence
Rotter Incomplete Sentence Blank
Julian Rotter
50. Cartoons in which one person is frustrating another; asked to describe how the frustrated person responds
Charles Spearmen
Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration (P-F) Study
Z-scores
Linear regression