SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
GRE Psychology: Measurement And Methodology
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
gre
,
psychology
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Compares 2 groups of people at the same time point
Lewis Terman
between subject
bar graph
cross-sectional design
2. Subjects alter behaviour because they are being observed
Discrete data
Illusory correlation
Hawthorne effect
range
3. compares means of 2 different groups to see if the two groups are truly different - analyze differences between means on continuous data - particularly useful with small n - cannot test for difference between more than 2 groups
T-test
Q-sort/measure
within subject
Cross validation
4. Revised Binet'S version - used with children - organized by age level - Best known predictor of future academic achievement
Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
Discrete data
ANOVA/analysis of variance
percentiles
5. When subject behave differently just because they thing that they have received the treatment substance or condition
Item analysis (reliability)
statistically significant
Empirical-keying or criterion-keying approach
placebo effect
6. Overall range or spread - most basic measure of variability - subtracts the lowest value from the highest value in a data set
range
interval variables
social desirability
Rosenthal effect
7. Allow generalization from sample to population - statistics (sample) - parameters (population): use statistics to estimate parameters
Field study
Longitudinal design
Inferential statistics
Descriptive statistics (+types)
8. Measure mastery in a particular area (e.g. final exam)
Criterion-referenced tests
mode
One-way ANOVA
Split-half reliability
9. Sorting cards into a normal distribution; each has a different statement on it about personality; to one end is 'least like self' - other is 'most like self' - and middle is neutral; factor analysis to reduce viewpoints into a few factors
ratio variables
External validity (+types)
Word Association Test
Q-sort/measure
10. Tests whether the means on one outcome or dependent variable are significantly different across groups - height or level of anxiety from anxiety scale
Experimental design
cross-sectional design
External validity (+types)
One-way ANOVA
11. figure out how much each score differs (deviates) from the mean by subtracting the mean from each score - square each of these deviation values (to get rid of negative value) - add all these squared deviations to get the sum of square - divide sum by
Objective tests (+types)
Vocational tests
Split-half reliability
variance (calculation)
12. Aims to match demographic characteristics to population (i.e. 50% female - etc)
stratified sampling
Aptitude tests
Standard normal distributions
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-R)
13. Tell you the average extent to which scores were different from the mean - if average standard deviation is large - then scores were highly dispersed
independent variable
Internal-External Locus of Control Scale
standard deviation (calculation)
Aptitude tests
14. The approach to construct assessment instruments - involves selection of items that can discriminate between various groups; responses determine if he is like a particular group or not; e.g. Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory
Empirical-keying or criterion-keying approach
Two-way ANOVA
Validity (+types)
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)
15. Knowing how to do something
histogram
Crystallized intelligence
Inferential statistics
Fluid intelligence
16. Mathematically combines and summarizes overall effects or findings for a topic; best known for consolidating effectiveness of psychotherapy - can calculate overall effect size or conclusion drawn from a collection of studies; needed when conflicting
research design
One-way ANOVA
Meta-analysis
Correlational relationships
17. Calculates how off the mean might be in either direction
standard error of mean
Myers-Brigg Type Indicator (MBTI)
Spearman r correlation coefficient
Field study
18. When people agree with opposing statements; giving tacit agreement
Objective tests (+types)
Acquiescence
statistics
mode
19. Used most commonly on standardized test
Donald Campbell and Donald Fiske
standard error of mean
percentiles
random sampling
20. Personality test from Jung'S theory; 93 questions 2 answers each; 4-letter personality type - each letter 1 of 2 possible opposing characteristics: Introverted vs. Extraverted - Sensing vs. Intuition - Feeling vs. Thinking - and - Judgment vs. Percep
cross-sectional design
Objective tests (+types)
Myers-Brigg Type Indicator (MBTI)
Internal-External Locus of Control Scale
21. Mean (standard error of mean) - median mode; normal and platykuric: equal; positively skewed: mode - med - mean; negatively skewed: mean - med - mode; bimodal: equal mean and med - 2 modes
Validity (+types)
Fluid intelligence
Central Tendency (types and distribution differences)
median
22. Measure innate ability to learn (debatable) - to predict later performance
Aptitude tests
Statistical regression
confounding variable
Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
23. Data that has been counted rather than measured - usually limited to whole or positive values - ex: group size - number of hospital visit - number of symptoms
Test-retest reliability
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
Draw-A-Person Test
Discrete data
24. Personality measure for 'normal' / less clinical groups than MMPI - by Harrison Gough
California Personality Inventory (CPI)
median
Meta-analysis
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
25. Analyses how a large group responded to each item on the measure; weeds out problematic questions with low discriminatory value; increases internal consistency
Linear regression
Concurrent validity
predictive value
Item analysis (reliability)
26. Tests the same person at multiple time points and looks at changes within that person
within subject
Draw-A-Person Test
variance and standard deviation
Donald Campbell and Donald Fiske
27. Whether content covers a good sample of construct being measured
Construct validity
Content validity
normal distribution(+characteristic)
Hawthorne effect
28. Studying the same objects at different points in the lifespan and provides better - more valid results than most other methods - costly - time commitment
Linear regression
social desirability
bar graph
Longitudinal design
29. For ranks; determining the line that describes a linear relationship
Spearman r correlation coefficient
Internal-External Locus of Control Scale
double-blind experiment
Learn the shape of different distributions
30. (Mental age/chronological age)/100 - Highest age = 16
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
31. For even number of values in the set - take the average of the two middle value
median
Two-way ANOVA
Criterion-referenced tests
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-R)
32. Numerically calculating and expressing correlation - r range -1 to +1 - 0 = no relationship
Pearson r correlation coefficient
ordinal variables
T-score
Cross validation
33. The hypothesis that no real differences or pattern exist
mode
Nonequivalent control group
Charles Spearmen
Null hypothesis
34. Used when equivalent one cannot be isolated
Objective tests (+types)
Content validity
Scientific approach
Nonequivalent control group
35. Measure the extent to which test measures what it intends to; concurrent - construct - content - face
Percentages under normal distribution based on SDs (from mean to end)
Donald Campbell and Donald Fiske
External validity (+types)
normal distribution(+characteristic)
36. Bell curve; larger the sample - greater chance of having a normal distribution
variance (calculation)
normal distribution(+characteristic)
cohort-sequential design
independent variable
37. The process of representing or analyzing numerical data
Content validity
Crystallized intelligence
statistics
nominal variables
38. Internal-External Locus of Control Scale
Julian Rotter
Pearson r correlation coefficient
bar graph
Split-half reliability
39. Not IQ - It is unlikely IQ captures all facets of it
Intelligence
Content validity
percentiles
double-blind experiment
40. Naturalistic setting - less control over environment than in lab; generates more hypotheses than able to prove
Julian Rotter
Alpha levels
Field study
Z-scores
41. A level of <0.05or <0.01 means that chance that seemingly significant errors are due to random variation rather than to true systematic variance is less than 5% or 1%
Alpha levels
Scientific approach
Concurrent validity
Charles Spearmen
42. The degree to which an independent variable can predict a dependent variable
Reactance
Word Association Test
predictive value
John Horn and Raymond Cattell
43. The age level of a person'S functioning according to the IQ test
Concurrent validity
Anne Anastasi
predictive value
mental age
44. Order - variables need to be arranged by order (not necessarily equally spaced) - ex: maranthon finishers
Reactance
Internal validity
ordinal variables
Variability
45. If it is significant - same finding can be generalized to the population - use test of significant to reject null hypothesis
statistically significant
Walter Mischel
Chi-square test
Reliability (+types)
46. Assess extent interests and strengths match those found by professionals in a particular job field
Domain-referenced tests
Frequency distributions (+variables)
Vocational tests
Anne Anastasi
47. Experimenter bias; researchers see what they want to see; minimized in double-blind
T-test
Mean IQ
Rosenthal effect
California Personality Inventory (CPI)
48. Revised Binet scale to Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale; also studied gifted children - those with higher IQs better adjusted
Validity (+types)
Longitudinal design
Lewis Terman
cohort-sequential design
49. 34.13% - 13.59% - 2.02% - 0.26% and - +3 99.74% - +2 97.72% - +1 84.13% - 0 50.00% - -1 15.87% - -2 2.28% - -3 0.26%
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-R)
Aptitude tests
Percentages under normal distribution based on SDs (from mean to end)
predictive value
50. Describe what is seen in each of 10 inkblots; scoring is complex; validity questionable
Cross validation
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)
percentiles
Rorschach Inkblot Test