SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Baker v Carr 1962
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
2. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Dennis v US 1951
Schenck v US 1919
3. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
4. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Miller v California 1973
Marbury v Madison 1803
5. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Katz v US 1967
Miller v California 1973
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
6. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
7. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Smith v Allwright 1944
Buckley v Baleo 1976
8. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Bush v Gore 2000
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Roe v Wade 1973
9. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
New York Times v US 1971
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lawrence v Texas 2003
10. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
11. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Betts v Brady 1942
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
12. Established judicial review
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Weeks v US 1914
13. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
14. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
15. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Oregon v Elstad 1985
16. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Bush v Gore 2000
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
17. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
18. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Korematsu v US 1944
Mapp v Ohio 1961
19. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Katz v US 1967
Kelo v New London 2005
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
20. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Korematsu v US 1944
Gregg v Georgia 1976
21. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
New York Times v US 1971
Smith v Allwright 1944
22. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Betts v Brady 1942
23. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
United States v Lopez 1995
Dennis v US 1951
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
24. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Virginia v Black 2002
Engel v Vitale 1962
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
US v Eichman 1990
25. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
US v Nixon 1974
Barron v Baltimore 1819
United States v Lopez 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
26. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Texas v Johnson 1989
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
27. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
28. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Texas v Johnson 1989
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Engel v Vitale 1962
29. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
30. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
31. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Clinton v New York 1998
Virginia v Black 2002
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
32. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Near v Minnesota 1931
Oregon v Elstad 1985
33. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
34. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miller v California 1973
Kelo v New London 2005
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
35. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Betts v Brady 1942
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
36. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
US v Nixon 1974
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
37. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Bush v Gore 2000
Gitlow v NY 1925
38. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Near v Minnesota 1931
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US v Nixon 1974
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
39. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Engel v Vitale 1962
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
40. Right to privacy
Kelo v New London 2005
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Clinton v New York 1998
41. Separate but equal for races
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Engel v Vitale 1962
42. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Katz v US 1967
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Smith v Allwright 1944
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
43. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Olmstead v US 1928
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
44. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
45. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Miller v California 1973
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Olmstead v US 1928
46. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Marbury v Madison 1803
New York Times v US 1971
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
47. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Near v Minnesota 1931
48. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
US v Nixon 1974
Olmstead v US 1928
Clinton v New York 1998
Smith v Allwright 1944
49. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Kelo v New London 2005
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
50. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Olmstead v US 1928
Powell v Alabama 1932