SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Engel v Vitale 1962
Fletcher v Peck 1810
United States v Lopez 1995
2. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Bush v Gore 2000
Olmstead v US 1928
3. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
US v Eichman 1990
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Oregon v Elstad 1985
4. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Clinton v New York 1998
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Kelo v New London 2005
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
5. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Powell v Alabama 1932
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Clinton v New York 1998
6. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
7. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
US v Nixon 1974
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Bush v Gore 2000
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
8. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Buckley v Baleo 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
9. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Clinton v New York 1998
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
10. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Korematsu v US 1944
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
11. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Weeks v US 1914
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
Smith v Allwright 1944
12. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Baker v Carr 1962
Korematsu v US 1944
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
13. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Fletcher v Peck 1810
14. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Clinton v New York 1998
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
15. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
US v Eichman 1990
Clinton v New York 1998
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
16. Separate but equal for races
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Olmstead v US 1928
17. Established exclusionary rule
Olmstead v US 1928
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Weeks v US 1914
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
18. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Dennis v US 1951
19. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Roe v Wade 1973
Barron v Baltimore 1819
20. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Nixon 1974
21. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
22. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Roe v Wade 1973
Katz v US 1967
23. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Furman v Georgia 1972
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katz v US 1967
24. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Katz v US 1967
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Mapp v Ohio 1961
25. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Texas v Johnson 1989
Olmstead v US 1928
Baker v Carr 1962
Barron v Baltimore 1819
26. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Weeks v US 1914
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Dennis v US 1951
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
27. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
28. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Engel v Vitale 1962
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
29. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
30. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Gitlow v NY 1925
Weeks v US 1914
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
31. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Kelo v New London 2005
Gitlow v NY 1925
Texas v Johnson 1989
32. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Katz v US 1967
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
33. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
34. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Marbury v Madison 1803
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Miranda v Arizona 1966
35. Separate is not equal
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
36. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
37. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
38. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US v Nixon 1974
Kelo v New London 2005
39. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Lawrence v Texas 2003
40. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
US v Eichman 1990
41. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
42. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Texas v Johnson 1989
Near v Minnesota 1931
Baker v Carr 1962
Engel v Vitale 1962
43. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Korematsu v US 1944
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US v Eichman 1990
United States v Lopez 1995
44. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Texas v Johnson 1989
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Lawrence v Texas 2003
45. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Smith v Allwright 1944
Virginia v Black 2002
Engel v Vitale 1962
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
46. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Schenck v US 1919
47. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Bush v Gore 2000
48. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Furman v Georgia 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
United States v Lopez 1995
49. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Baker v Carr 1962
Barron v Baltimore 1819
50. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968