SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Miller v California 1973
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gregg v Georgia 1976
2. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Smith v Allwright 1944
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
3. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Barron v Baltimore 1819
4. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
5. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Korematsu v US 1944
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
6. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Baker v Carr 1962
Korematsu v US 1944
US v Eichman 1990
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
7. Separate is not equal
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
8. Established judicial review
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
Marbury v Madison 1803
Near v Minnesota 1931
9. Established exclusionary rule
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Roe v Wade 1973
Weeks v US 1914
10. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Furman v Georgia 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
New York Times v US 1971
11. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Roe v Wade 1973
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
12. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
US v Nixon 1974
Powell v Alabama 1932
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
13. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
US v Nixon 1974
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Olmstead v US 1928
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
14. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Korematsu v US 1944
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
15. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Miller v California 1973
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
16. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Dennis v US 1951
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Baker v Carr 1962
Korematsu v US 1944
17. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Furman v Georgia 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gitlow v NY 1925
Mapp v Ohio 1961
18. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Korematsu v US 1944
Texas v Johnson 1989
Roe v Wade 1973
19. Separate but equal for races
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Virginia v Black 2002
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
20. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US v Eichman 1990
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
21. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Miller v California 1973
Buckley v Baleo 1976
22. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US v Eichman 1990
23. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
24. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Betts v Brady 1942
25. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
26. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Marbury v Madison 1803
Betts v Brady 1942
Bush v Gore 2000
Weeks v US 1914
27. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
28. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Katz v US 1967
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Near v Minnesota 1931
Kelo v New London 2005
29. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Betts v Brady 1942
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
30. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
31. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dennis v US 1951
Marbury v Madison 1803
Clinton v New York 1998
32. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US v Nixon 1974
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gregg v Georgia 1976
33. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
United States v Lopez 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
34. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Katz v US 1967
Fletcher v Peck 1810
US v Nixon 1974
35. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Korematsu v US 1944
36. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Katz v US 1967
US v Nixon 1974
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
37. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Kelo v New London 2005
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
38. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Schenck v US 1919
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Texas v Johnson 1989
39. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
40. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Olmstead v US 1928
Texas v Johnson 1989
41. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Virginia v Black 2002
Marbury v Madison 1803
42. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Clinton v New York 1998
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Miller v California 1973
43. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
New York Times v US 1971
Virginia v Black 2002
US v Eichman 1990
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
44. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Smith v Allwright 1944
New York Times v US 1971
45. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Katz v US 1967
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
46. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
47. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
48. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Powell v Alabama 1932
Dennis v US 1951
Schenck v US 1919
49. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Schenck v US 1919
Clinton v New York 1998
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
50. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000