SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Smith v Allwright 1944
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
2. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
3. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Near v Minnesota 1931
Furman v Georgia 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
4. Right to privacy
Schenck v US 1919
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
5. Established judicial review
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
6. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
US v Eichman 1990
Virginia v Black 2002
7. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Virginia v Black 2002
US v Nixon 1974
Clinton v New York 1998
United States v Lopez 1995
8. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Baker v Carr 1962
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
9. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
US v Nixon 1974
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
10. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Near v Minnesota 1931
11. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Powell v Alabama 1932
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Marbury v Madison 1803
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
12. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
13. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Katz v US 1967
Gitlow v NY 1925
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
14. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Schenck v US 1919
Powell v Alabama 1932
US v Eichman 1990
15. Separate but equal for races
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Near v Minnesota 1931
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
16. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Dennis v US 1951
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
17. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Dennis v US 1951
Schenck v US 1919
New York Times v US 1971
18. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Buckley v Baleo 1976
19. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Schenck v US 1919
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gregg v Georgia 1976
20. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Kelo v New London 2005
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
21. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Katz v US 1967
Dennis v US 1951
22. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Roe v Wade 1973
23. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Olmstead v US 1928
Roe v Wade 1973
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
24. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Virginia v Black 2002
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Schenck v US 1919
25. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
26. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Schenck v US 1919
Katz v US 1967
Bush v Gore 2000
Near v Minnesota 1931
27. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
US v Nixon 1974
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Roe v Wade 1973
28. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
US v Eichman 1990
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
Near v Minnesota 1931
29. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Korematsu v US 1944
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
30. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Miller v California 1973
Dennis v US 1951
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
31. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Betts v Brady 1942
32. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
33. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Furman v Georgia 1972
Miller v California 1973
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
34. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Olmstead v US 1928
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Dennis v US 1951
35. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
Betts v Brady 1942
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
36. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Olmstead v US 1928
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
37. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Dennis v US 1951
Schenck v US 1919
38. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
39. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Bush v Gore 2000
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
40. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
41. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Near v Minnesota 1931
Korematsu v US 1944
Virginia v Black 2002
Dennis v US 1951
42. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Betts v Brady 1942
Near v Minnesota 1931
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gregg v Georgia 1976
43. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Barron v Baltimore 1819
New York Times v US 1971
Bush v Gore 2000
44. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
45. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Virginia v Black 2002
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
46. Established exclusionary rule
United States v Lopez 1995
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Weeks v US 1914
Bush v Gore 2000
47. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Schenck v US 1919
Gitlow v NY 1925
Kelo v New London 2005
48. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Furman v Georgia 1972
49. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
50. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Katz v US 1967