SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Roe v Wade 1973
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Near v Minnesota 1931
2. Right to privacy
Weeks v US 1914
US v Eichman 1990
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Oregon v Elstad 1985
3. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Schenck v US 1919
Kelo v New London 2005
Roe v Wade 1973
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
4. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Olmstead v US 1928
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
5. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lawrence v Texas 2003
6. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Miller v California 1973
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Roe v Wade 1973
7. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
8. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
9. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
10. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Dennis v US 1951
11. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
12. Established exclusionary rule
Dennis v US 1951
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Weeks v US 1914
13. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Baker v Carr 1962
Kelo v New London 2005
Smith v Allwright 1944
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
14. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Gitlow v NY 1925
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
15. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Powell v Alabama 1932
Marbury v Madison 1803
Mapp v Ohio 1961
16. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
17. You can burn the flag
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Betts v Brady 1942
Texas v Johnson 1989
Fletcher v Peck 1810
18. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Smith v Allwright 1944
Lawrence v Texas 2003
19. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Katz v US 1967
Miller v California 1973
20. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Mapp v Ohio 1961
New York Times v US 1971
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
21. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Smith v Allwright 1944
Schenck v US 1919
22. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
Engel v Vitale 1962
23. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
24. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Schenck v US 1919
Olmstead v US 1928
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Roe v Wade 1973
25. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gitlow v NY 1925
Kelo v New London 2005
Oregon v Elstad 1985
26. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
New York Times v US 1971
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
27. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Near v Minnesota 1931
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
28. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Roe v Wade 1973
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
New York Times v US 1971
29. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Lawrence v Texas 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
30. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Near v Minnesota 1931
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Kelo v New London 2005
31. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US v Eichman 1990
32. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
US v Eichman 1990
Schenck v US 1919
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
33. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Smith v Allwright 1944
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Bush v Gore 2000
34. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Clinton v New York 1998
35. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Powell v Alabama 1932
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
36. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Katz v US 1967
US v Eichman 1990
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
37. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Powell v Alabama 1932
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
38. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
39. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Schenck v US 1919
Kelo v New London 2005
40. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Katz v US 1967
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v US 1971
41. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
US v Eichman 1990
New York Times v US 1971
Bush v Gore 2000
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
42. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Engel v Vitale 1962
United States v Lopez 1995
43. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Smith v Allwright 1944
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
44. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
US v Nixon 1974
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
45. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US v Nixon 1974
46. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Clinton v New York 1998
Texas v Johnson 1989
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Olmstead v US 1928
47. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Clinton v New York 1998
48. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Roe v Wade 1973
Furman v Georgia 1972
49. Separate is not equal
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Betts v Brady 1942
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gitlow v NY 1925
50. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Virginia v Black 2002
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969