SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Betts v Brady 1942
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Kelo v New London 2005
2. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Dennis v US 1951
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Katz v US 1967
3. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Baker v Carr 1962
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
4. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Smith v Allwright 1944
Marbury v Madison 1803
US v Eichman 1990
5. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
6. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
7. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Texas v Johnson 1989
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
8. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
US v Nixon 1974
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dennis v US 1951
9. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Clinton v New York 1998
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
10. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
US v Nixon 1974
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
11. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Clinton v New York 1998
Near v Minnesota 1931
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Smith v Allwright 1944
12. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Clinton v New York 1998
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Schenck v US 1919
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
13. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
US v Nixon 1974
Fletcher v Peck 1810
14. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Betts v Brady 1942
15. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Clinton v New York 1998
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Buckley v Baleo 1976
New York Times v US 1971
16. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
United States v Lopez 1995
17. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Smith v Allwright 1944
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bush v Gore 2000
Korematsu v US 1944
18. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
19. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Powell v Alabama 1932
Betts v Brady 1942
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Dennis v US 1951
20. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Bush v Gore 2000
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Near v Minnesota 1931
21. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Baker v Carr 1962
New York Times v US 1971
Mapp v Ohio 1961
22. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Texas v Johnson 1989
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Korematsu v US 1944
23. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Engel v Vitale 1962
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
24. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Schenck v US 1919
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
25. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Bush v Gore 2000
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
26. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Powell v Alabama 1932
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
27. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Kelo v New London 2005
New York Times v US 1971
Powell v Alabama 1932
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
28. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
US v Nixon 1974
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Texas v Johnson 1989
29. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
30. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
31. Established judicial review
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Marbury v Madison 1803
32. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Roe v Wade 1973
Near v Minnesota 1931
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
33. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Miller v California 1973
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
34. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gitlow v NY 1925
Virginia v Black 2002
Buckley v Baleo 1976
35. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Korematsu v US 1944
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Engel v Vitale 1962
36. Right to privacy
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Korematsu v US 1944
37. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Engel v Vitale 1962
38. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gitlow v NY 1925
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dennis v US 1951
39. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Schenck v US 1919
South Dakota v Dole 1987
40. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Furman v Georgia 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Katz v US 1967
41. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
Dennis v US 1951
42. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
43. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Smith v Allwright 1944
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
United States v Lopez 1995
44. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
45. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
Bush v Gore 2000
Engel v Vitale 1962
46. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
47. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Marbury v Madison 1803
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Olmstead v US 1928
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
48. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Bush v Gore 2000
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
49. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
50. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Miller v California 1973
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Roe v Wade 1973