SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
2. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Clinton v New York 1998
Virginia v Black 2002
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
3. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Smith v Allwright 1944
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
4. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Furman v Georgia 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Fletcher v Peck 1810
5. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Schenck v US 1919
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
6. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Furman v Georgia 1972
7. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Betts v Brady 1942
Near v Minnesota 1931
Powell v Alabama 1932
United States v Lopez 1995
8. You can burn the flag
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Texas v Johnson 1989
9. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Smith v Allwright 1944
10. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Powell v Alabama 1932
Roe v Wade 1973
Near v Minnesota 1931
11. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Clinton v New York 1998
12. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katz v US 1967
13. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
New York Times v US 1971
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
14. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Baker v Carr 1962
Furman v Georgia 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
Fletcher v Peck 1810
15. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Furman v Georgia 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
16. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
17. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
South Dakota v Dole 1987
18. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Furman v Georgia 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
19. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Baker v Carr 1962
New York Times v US 1971
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
20. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Roe v Wade 1973
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
21. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
22. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Dennis v US 1951
23. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Miller v California 1973
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Roe v Wade 1973
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
24. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
US v Eichman 1990
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Near v Minnesota 1931
Fletcher v Peck 1810
25. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
New York Times v US 1971
26. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Smith v Allwright 1944
Katz v US 1967
Gitlow v NY 1925
27. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Miller v California 1973
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
28. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Kelo v New London 2005
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Lawrence v Texas 2003
29. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Korematsu v US 1944
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
30. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Bush v Gore 2000
United States v Lopez 1995
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
31. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
New York Times v US 1971
32. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Virginia v Black 2002
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
33. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
South Dakota v Dole 1987
34. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
35. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Clinton v New York 1998
Texas v Johnson 1989
US v Eichman 1990
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
36. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Bush v Gore 2000
US v Eichman 1990
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
37. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Powell v Alabama 1932
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Weeks v US 1914
38. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Oregon v Elstad 1985
US v Eichman 1990
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
39. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US v Nixon 1974
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
40. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
United States v Lopez 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
41. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
US v Nixon 1974
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
42. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
43. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
44. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
45. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Clinton v New York 1998
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
46. Established exclusionary rule
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Furman v Georgia 1972
Weeks v US 1914
South Dakota v Dole 1987
47. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Texas v Johnson 1989
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Katz v US 1967
Buckley v Baleo 1976
48. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Baker v Carr 1962
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
49. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Clinton v New York 1998
Roe v Wade 1973
50. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Betts v Brady 1942
US v Nixon 1974
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Miranda v Arizona 1966