SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Clinton v New York 1998
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
2. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
3. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Weeks v US 1914
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Texas v Johnson 1989
4. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
United States v Lopez 1995
Katz v US 1967
5. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Miller v California 1973
Virginia v Black 2002
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
6. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Miranda v Arizona 1966
7. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
US v Eichman 1990
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
8. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
9. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Miller v California 1973
Clinton v New York 1998
Bush v Gore 2000
10. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Barron v Baltimore 1819
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
11. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
12. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Marbury v Madison 1803
Dennis v US 1951
13. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
United States v Lopez 1995
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
14. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Gitlow v NY 1925
Olmstead v US 1928
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
15. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
16. Established exclusionary rule
Dennis v US 1951
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Weeks v US 1914
17. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
18. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
US v Nixon 1974
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
19. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Buckley v Baleo 1976
20. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
New York Times v US 1971
US v Eichman 1990
Smith v Allwright 1944
Fletcher v Peck 1810
21. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
South Dakota v Dole 1987
22. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Miranda v Arizona 1966
23. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Baker v Carr 1962
Betts v Brady 1942
US v Eichman 1990
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
24. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
25. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
New York Times v US 1971
26. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Clinton v New York 1998
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
27. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Furman v Georgia 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
28. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Eichman 1990
29. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Clinton v New York 1998
Katz v US 1967
30. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Bush v Gore 2000
Katz v US 1967
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Baker v Carr 1962
31. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Baker v Carr 1962
Oregon v Elstad 1985
32. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Smith v Allwright 1944
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
33. Separate is not equal
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Bush v Gore 2000
US v Nixon 1974
34. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Virginia v Black 2002
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
US v Eichman 1990
Dennis v US 1951
35. Separate but equal for races
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
New York Times v US 1971
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
36. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
US v Nixon 1974
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
37. Right to privacy
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
38. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
New York Times v US 1971
Texas v Johnson 1989
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
US v Eichman 1990
39. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Roe v Wade 1973
Gregg v Georgia 1976
New York Times v US 1971
40. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Virginia v Black 2002
41. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
Barron v Baltimore 1819
42. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Dennis v US 1951
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
43. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
44. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Powell v Alabama 1932
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Schenck v US 1919
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
45. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
United States v Lopez 1995
Lawrence v Texas 2003
New York Times v US 1971
46. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
47. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
48. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Miller v California 1973
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Katz v US 1967
49. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
50. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Plessy v Ferguson 1896