SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Miller v California 1973
2. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Engel v Vitale 1962
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
3. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
US v Eichman 1990
Schenck v US 1919
New York Times v US 1971
Olmstead v US 1928
4. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Powell v Alabama 1932
Virginia v Black 2002
Kelo v New London 2005
5. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Katz v US 1967
Buckley v Baleo 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
6. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US v Eichman 1990
Korematsu v US 1944
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
7. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
New York Times v US 1971
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
8. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Kelo v New London 2005
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Furman v Georgia 1972
9. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
10. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Lawrence v Texas 2003
US v Nixon 1974
11. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Mapp v Ohio 1961
12. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Korematsu v US 1944
Kelo v New London 2005
Baker v Carr 1962
13. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Schenck v US 1919
Katz v US 1967
New York Times v US 1971
14. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Baker v Carr 1962
Smith v Allwright 1944
US v Eichman 1990
15. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Weeks v US 1914
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Bush v Gore 2000
Clinton v New York 1998
16. Established exclusionary rule
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Weeks v US 1914
Oregon v Elstad 1985
17. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Schenck v US 1919
Gitlow v NY 1925
Olmstead v US 1928
Bush v Gore 2000
18. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Mapp v Ohio 1961
South Dakota v Dole 1987
19. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Texas v Johnson 1989
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
20. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Engel v Vitale 1962
United States v Lopez 1995
21. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Near v Minnesota 1931
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
22. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Olmstead v US 1928
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
New York Times v US 1971
23. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Virginia v Black 2002
Marbury v Madison 1803
Katz v US 1967
Gregg v Georgia 1976
24. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Nixon 1974
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
25. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
26. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Dennis v US 1951
Baker v Carr 1962
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
27. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Gitlow v NY 1925
Olmstead v US 1928
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
28. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Texas v Johnson 1989
South Dakota v Dole 1987
29. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Engel v Vitale 1962
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
30. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
31. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Marbury v Madison 1803
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Furman v Georgia 1972
32. You can burn the flag
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
33. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
34. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
United States v Lopez 1995
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
35. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Buckley v Baleo 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
36. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
37. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Miller v California 1973
Powell v Alabama 1932
US v Eichman 1990
Olmstead v US 1928
38. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Miller v California 1973
Baker v Carr 1962
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
39. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
40. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
41. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Baker v Carr 1962
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
42. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
43. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
New York Times v US 1971
Texas v Johnson 1989
44. Separate is not equal
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
United States v Lopez 1995
45. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Schenck v US 1919
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
46. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Marbury v Madison 1803
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
47. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
48. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Marbury v Madison 1803
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miller v California 1973
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
49. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Korematsu v US 1944
50. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Roe v Wade 1973
US v Eichman 1990
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests