SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Powell v Alabama 1932
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Dennis v US 1951
2. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Katz v US 1967
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Nixon 1974
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
3. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Weeks v US 1914
4. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Dennis v US 1951
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
5. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
6. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Weeks v US 1914
Fletcher v Peck 1810
7. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
8. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Virginia v Black 2002
Roe v Wade 1973
Dennis v US 1951
9. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Clinton v New York 1998
10. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
11. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Schenck v US 1919
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
12. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Betts v Brady 1942
Miller v California 1973
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
13. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Bush v Gore 2000
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
14. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Olmstead v US 1928
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Near v Minnesota 1931
15. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Katz v US 1967
Texas v Johnson 1989
Korematsu v US 1944
16. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Furman v Georgia 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Korematsu v US 1944
17. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Gitlow v NY 1925
Furman v Georgia 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
18. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
New York Times v US 1971
Betts v Brady 1942
Kelo v New London 2005
19. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
20. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Gitlow v NY 1925
Powell v Alabama 1932
21. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
22. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Dennis v US 1951
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Olmstead v US 1928
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
23. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Furman v Georgia 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
24. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Roe v Wade 1973
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
25. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Dennis v US 1951
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
26. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gitlow v NY 1925
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Katz v US 1967
27. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Schenck v US 1919
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
28. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
Olmstead v US 1928
Mapp v Ohio 1961
29. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Katz v US 1967
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Smith v Allwright 1944
30. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US v Nixon 1974
31. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Roe v Wade 1973
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
32. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Smith v Allwright 1944
South Dakota v Dole 1987
33. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Miranda v Arizona 1966
New York Times v US 1971
Olmstead v US 1928
34. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Near v Minnesota 1931
Oregon v Elstad 1985
United States v Lopez 1995
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
35. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Schenck v US 1919
36. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
37. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Powell v Alabama 1932
Korematsu v US 1944
Near v Minnesota 1931
Furman v Georgia 1972
38. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Schenck v US 1919
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Weeks v US 1914
39. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Gregg v Georgia 1976
40. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Miller v California 1973
41. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Marbury v Madison 1803
Furman v Georgia 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Clinton v New York 1998
42. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Smith v Allwright 1944
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
43. Established judicial review
Roe v Wade 1973
Marbury v Madison 1803
Schenck v US 1919
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
44. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
45. Separate is not equal
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Roe v Wade 1973
46. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Weeks v US 1914
Mapp v Ohio 1961
47. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
48. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
49. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
50. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Bush v Gore 2000
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Katzenbach v McClung 1964