SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Texas v Johnson 1989
US v Eichman 1990
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
2. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
3. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Near v Minnesota 1931
4. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Lawrence v Texas 2003
US v Nixon 1974
5. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Mapp v Ohio 1961
US v Nixon 1974
Fletcher v Peck 1810
6. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Dennis v US 1951
Olmstead v US 1928
United States v Lopez 1995
Schenck v US 1919
7. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Katz v US 1967
8. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Near v Minnesota 1931
Engel v Vitale 1962
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
9. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Texas v Johnson 1989
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Miller v California 1973
10. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
US v Eichman 1990
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gitlow v NY 1925
US v Nixon 1974
11. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Bush v Gore 2000
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
12. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Korematsu v US 1944
Texas v Johnson 1989
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
13. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Olmstead v US 1928
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Schenck v US 1919
14. Right to privacy
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Dennis v US 1951
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
15. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
US v Nixon 1974
Korematsu v US 1944
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
16. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
17. Separate but equal for races
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Kelo v New London 2005
18. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
19. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Gitlow v NY 1925
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Smith v Allwright 1944
United States v Lopez 1995
20. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Clinton v New York 1998
Virginia v Black 2002
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
21. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
22. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gitlow v NY 1925
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
23. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Clinton v New York 1998
Bush v Gore 2000
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
24. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Virginia v Black 2002
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Katz v US 1967
25. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Roe v Wade 1973
26. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
Baker v Carr 1962
Roe v Wade 1973
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
27. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
Barron v Baltimore 1819
28. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Powell v Alabama 1932
Virginia v Black 2002
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
29. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
30. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Miranda v Arizona 1966
31. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
Marbury v Madison 1803
Furman v Georgia 1972
32. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
United States v Lopez 1995
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
33. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US v Eichman 1990
Schenck v US 1919
Baker v Carr 1962
34. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Texas v Johnson 1989
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
35. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Powell v Alabama 1932
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Roe v Wade 1973
Miller v California 1973
36. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
New York Times v US 1971
Powell v Alabama 1932
37. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Bush v Gore 2000
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Engel v Vitale 1962
38. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
US v Nixon 1974
Engel v Vitale 1962
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
39. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
40. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Virginia v Black 2002
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
41. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
42. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Marbury v Madison 1803
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
43. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
44. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Furman v Georgia 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Baker v Carr 1962
45. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
South Dakota v Dole 1987
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
46. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
47. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
48. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Mapp v Ohio 1961
New York Times v US 1971
49. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Fletcher v Peck 1810
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
Miranda v Arizona 1966
50. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
United States v Lopez 1995
Olmstead v US 1928