SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Bush v Gore 2000
Clinton v New York 1998
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gregg v Georgia 1976
2. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
Near v Minnesota 1931
3. Established exclusionary rule
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Weeks v US 1914
4. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Engel v Vitale 1962
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Schenck v US 1919
5. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Furman v Georgia 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Olmstead v US 1928
6. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Dennis v US 1951
Clinton v New York 1998
Smith v Allwright 1944
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
7. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
8. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Schenck v US 1919
9. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Virginia v Black 2002
Olmstead v US 1928
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
10. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
11. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Dennis v US 1951
Fletcher v Peck 1810
12. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
13. You can burn the flag
Bush v Gore 2000
Texas v Johnson 1989
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Miranda v Arizona 1966
14. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
15. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
Baker v Carr 1962
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
16. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
US v Eichman 1990
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Mapp v Ohio 1961
17. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Smith v Allwright 1944
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
18. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Bush v Gore 2000
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Roe v Wade 1973
19. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Marbury v Madison 1803
Fletcher v Peck 1810
20. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
21. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
New York Times v US 1971
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Virginia v Black 2002
22. Established judicial review
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Betts v Brady 1942
Marbury v Madison 1803
23. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Roe v Wade 1973
Smith v Allwright 1944
Baker v Carr 1962
Katz v US 1967
24. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Clinton v New York 1998
Furman v Georgia 1972
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
25. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
26. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
27. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Schenck v US 1919
United States v Lopez 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
28. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Olmstead v US 1928
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
29. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Near v Minnesota 1931
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
30. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Powell v Alabama 1932
31. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Bush v Gore 2000
US v Nixon 1974
Barron v Baltimore 1819
32. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Miranda v Arizona 1966
33. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
34. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
35. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
36. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
United States v Lopez 1995
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
37. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Kelo v New London 2005
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Mapp v Ohio 1961
38. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
39. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Fletcher v Peck 1810
40. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
41. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
42. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Dennis v US 1951
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
US v Nixon 1974
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
43. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Schenck v US 1919
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
44. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
US v Nixon 1974
Bush v Gore 2000
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
45. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
46. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Roe v Wade 1973
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Katz v US 1967
47. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
US v Nixon 1974
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
48. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Roe v Wade 1973
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
US v Nixon 1974
49. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Olmstead v US 1928
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Buckley v Baleo 1976
50. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Katz v US 1967
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests