SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Separate is not equal
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Korematsu v US 1944
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
2. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Baker v Carr 1962
Virginia v Black 2002
3. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
4. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Fletcher v Peck 1810
5. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
6. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Schenck v US 1919
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
7. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Roe v Wade 1973
8. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
US v Nixon 1974
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
9. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Olmstead v US 1928
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Katz v US 1967
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
10. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
11. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Dennis v US 1951
Kelo v New London 2005
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
12. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Katz v US 1967
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
13. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Lawrence v Texas 2003
14. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Clinton v New York 1998
Dennis v US 1951
Kelo v New London 2005
Smith v Allwright 1944
15. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
16. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
17. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
18. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Dennis v US 1951
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
United States v Lopez 1995
Miranda v Arizona 1966
19. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Dennis v US 1951
Schenck v US 1919
20. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
United States v Lopez 1995
Baker v Carr 1962
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
21. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
United States v Lopez 1995
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
22. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
23. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
24. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Smith v Allwright 1944
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
25. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
United States v Lopez 1995
Powell v Alabama 1932
Furman v Georgia 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
26. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
27. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Bush v Gore 2000
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
28. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gitlow v NY 1925
Near v Minnesota 1931
Kelo v New London 2005
29. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Furman v Georgia 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
Miranda v Arizona 1966
30. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Bush v Gore 2000
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
31. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Kelo v New London 2005
32. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Lawrence v Texas 2003
New York Times v US 1971
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
33. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
34. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
35. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Roe v Wade 1973
36. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Fletcher v Peck 1810
37. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
38. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Clinton v New York 1998
Smith v Allwright 1944
39. You can burn the flag
Smith v Allwright 1944
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
40. Right to privacy
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Marbury v Madison 1803
41. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gitlow v NY 1925
42. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Near v Minnesota 1931
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
43. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
44. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Schenck v US 1919
45. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
46. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Betts v Brady 1942
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
US v Eichman 1990
47. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Gitlow v NY 1925
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Furman v Georgia 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
48. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
United States v Lopez 1995
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
49. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bush v Gore 2000
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
50. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Schenck v US 1919
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966