SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Schenck v US 1919
Powell v Alabama 1932
Miller v California 1973
2. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Furman v Georgia 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
3. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
4. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
New York Times v US 1971
Miller v California 1973
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gitlow v NY 1925
5. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
6. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Marbury v Madison 1803
Kelo v New London 2005
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Miller v California 1973
7. Right to privacy
US v Nixon 1974
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
8. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Miranda v Arizona 1966
United States v Lopez 1995
Clinton v New York 1998
Lawrence v Texas 2003
9. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Betts v Brady 1942
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
10. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
11. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Engel v Vitale 1962
Kelo v New London 2005
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
12. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
US v Nixon 1974
Roe v Wade 1973
US v Eichman 1990
13. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
14. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
US v Eichman 1990
United States v Lopez 1995
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
15. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Schenck v US 1919
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
16. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
US v Eichman 1990
17. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Texas v Johnson 1989
Baker v Carr 1962
Smith v Allwright 1944
18. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Smith v Allwright 1944
Kelo v New London 2005
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
19. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
United States v Lopez 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
New York Times v US 1971
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
20. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Clinton v New York 1998
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
21. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Olmstead v US 1928
US v Eichman 1990
22. You can burn the flag
Powell v Alabama 1932
Texas v Johnson 1989
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
23. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Schenck v US 1919
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
24. Established judicial review
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Marbury v Madison 1803
25. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Engel v Vitale 1962
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
26. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
US v Nixon 1974
Weeks v US 1914
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Marbury v Madison 1803
27. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Kelo v New London 2005
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
28. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
29. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Olmstead v US 1928
Powell v Alabama 1932
30. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Engel v Vitale 1962
Mapp v Ohio 1961
United States v Lopez 1995
Buckley v Baleo 1976
31. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Bush v Gore 2000
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
New York Times v US 1971
32. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Kelo v New London 2005
Clinton v New York 1998
Miranda v Arizona 1966
33. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
34. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Powell v Alabama 1932
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
35. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Baker v Carr 1962
Katz v US 1967
Near v Minnesota 1931
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
36. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Marbury v Madison 1803
Dennis v US 1951
Katz v US 1967
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
37. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
38. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
39. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Korematsu v US 1944
40. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US v Eichman 1990
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Powell v Alabama 1932
41. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Roe v Wade 1973
42. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
US v Eichman 1990
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
43. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
Katz v US 1967
44. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
45. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Weeks v US 1914
New York Times v US 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
46. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Furman v Georgia 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
Miranda v Arizona 1966
47. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Smith v Allwright 1944
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Clinton v New York 1998
Texas v Johnson 1989
48. Separate but equal for races
Engel v Vitale 1962
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Betts v Brady 1942
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
49. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
50. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Roe v Wade 1973
US v Eichman 1990
Virginia v Black 2002