SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Furman v Georgia 1972
Smith v Allwright 1944
2. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Kelo v New London 2005
3. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US v Nixon 1974
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
4. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
United States v Lopez 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
5. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Furman v Georgia 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
6. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
US v Nixon 1974
Schenck v US 1919
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
7. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Clinton v New York 1998
8. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
9. Right to privacy
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
10. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Schenck v US 1919
Near v Minnesota 1931
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
11. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Olmstead v US 1928
Katz v US 1967
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
12. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Schenck v US 1919
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Powell v Alabama 1932
13. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
14. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
US v Nixon 1974
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Lawrence v Texas 2003
15. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Olmstead v US 1928
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
16. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
17. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Roe v Wade 1973
Marbury v Madison 1803
Betts v Brady 1942
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
18. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Dennis v US 1951
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Powell v Alabama 1932
19. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Katz v US 1967
20. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Engel v Vitale 1962
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Korematsu v US 1944
Texas v Johnson 1989
21. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Engel v Vitale 1962
22. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
23. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Powell v Alabama 1932
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Engel v Vitale 1962
24. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
25. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Kelo v New London 2005
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Baker v Carr 1962
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
26. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
Lawrence v Texas 2003
27. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
New York Times v US 1971
28. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Baker v Carr 1962
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Near v Minnesota 1931
29. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Kelo v New London 2005
30. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
Furman v Georgia 1972
31. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
32. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Barron v Baltimore 1819
US v Nixon 1974
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
33. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
34. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
35. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
New York Times v US 1971
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Dennis v US 1951
Engel v Vitale 1962
36. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Marbury v Madison 1803
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Near v Minnesota 1931
Bush v Gore 2000
37. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Roe v Wade 1973
38. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
39. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
South Dakota v Dole 1987
40. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
41. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Kelo v New London 2005
Roe v Wade 1973
Dennis v US 1951
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
42. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
43. Separate is not equal
Clinton v New York 1998
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
44. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Powell v Alabama 1932
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
45. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Furman v Georgia 1972
46. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Korematsu v US 1944
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
47. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Olmstead v US 1928
Kelo v New London 2005
Lawrence v Texas 2003
48. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Katz v US 1967
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
49. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Powell v Alabama 1932
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Smith v Allwright 1944
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
50. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Miller v California 1973
Virginia v Black 2002
Tinker v Des Moines 1969