SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
2. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Baker v Carr 1962
3. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
New York Times v US 1971
South Dakota v Dole 1987
4. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Virginia v Black 2002
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
5. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Virginia v Black 2002
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
6. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Marbury v Madison 1803
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Smith v Allwright 1944
7. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gitlow v NY 1925
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
8. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Smith v Allwright 1944
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Barron v Baltimore 1819
9. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
10. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
Texas v Johnson 1989
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
11. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US v Eichman 1990
12. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Powell v Alabama 1932
13. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Near v Minnesota 1931
US v Eichman 1990
Gregg v Georgia 1976
14. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
15. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Weeks v US 1914
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
16. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Texas v Johnson 1989
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
17. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Kelo v New London 2005
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Bush v Gore 2000
18. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
US v Eichman 1990
19. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Near v Minnesota 1931
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Engel v Vitale 1962
Schenck v US 1919
20. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Virginia v Black 2002
21. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
New York Times v US 1971
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
22. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Miller v California 1973
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Near v Minnesota 1931
23. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Bush v Gore 2000
Roe v Wade 1973
Clinton v New York 1998
24. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
United States v Lopez 1995
Katz v US 1967
25. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US v Nixon 1974
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
26. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
US v Eichman 1990
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Texas v Johnson 1989
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
27. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Bush v Gore 2000
28. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Dennis v US 1951
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gregg v Georgia 1976
29. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Olmstead v US 1928
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Bush v Gore 2000
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
30. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Miller v California 1973
31. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Smith v Allwright 1944
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Miller v California 1973
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
32. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
33. Established judicial review
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Powell v Alabama 1932
Marbury v Madison 1803
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
34. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dennis v US 1951
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
35. Separate but equal for races
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
36. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
37. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
38. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Miller v California 1973
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US v Nixon 1974
39. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Barron v Baltimore 1819
40. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Dennis v US 1951
41. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
42. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Betts v Brady 1942
Clinton v New York 1998
Miller v California 1973
43. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Weeks v US 1914
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
44. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Korematsu v US 1944
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Gitlow v NY 1925
45. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Mapp v Ohio 1961
46. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Katz v US 1967
Oregon v Elstad 1985
47. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bush v Gore 2000
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
48. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Marbury v Madison 1803
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
49. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Baker v Carr 1962
Mapp v Ohio 1961
50. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
Griswold v Connecticut 1965