SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
US v Eichman 1990
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
2. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Katz v US 1967
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Roe v Wade 1973
3. Established exclusionary rule
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Kelo v New London 2005
Weeks v US 1914
Gitlow v NY 1925
4. Right to privacy
United States v Lopez 1995
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
5. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Kelo v New London 2005
6. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Weeks v US 1914
Furman v Georgia 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
7. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Dennis v US 1951
Katz v US 1967
8. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Powell v Alabama 1932
9. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Olmstead v US 1928
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Mapp v Ohio 1961
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
10. Separate but equal for races
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Dennis v US 1951
11. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
12. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Dennis v US 1951
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
13. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
US v Eichman 1990
South Dakota v Dole 1987
14. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
US v Nixon 1974
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
15. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Texas v Johnson 1989
16. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Betts v Brady 1942
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Dennis v US 1951
Near v Minnesota 1931
17. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
18. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Katz v US 1967
19. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Bush v Gore 2000
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
South Dakota v Dole 1987
20. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Katz v US 1967
United States v Lopez 1995
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Texas v Johnson 1989
21. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Bush v Gore 2000
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Miller v California 1973
22. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Marbury v Madison 1803
US v Eichman 1990
23. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Katz v US 1967
Schenck v US 1919
24. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Dennis v US 1951
US v Eichman 1990
25. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Fletcher v Peck 1810
US v Nixon 1974
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
26. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Schenck v US 1919
Buckley v Baleo 1976
27. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Kelo v New London 2005
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
28. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Weeks v US 1914
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
29. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Miller v California 1973
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Schenck v US 1919
30. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Dennis v US 1951
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Smith v Allwright 1944
31. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
32. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Virginia v Black 2002
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
33. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Weeks v US 1914
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
34. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
35. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Clinton v New York 1998
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Near v Minnesota 1931
36. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Schenck v US 1919
37. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gregg v Georgia 1976
38. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Kelo v New London 2005
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Baker v Carr 1962
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
39. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Korematsu v US 1944
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
40. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Smith v Allwright 1944
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
41. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
42. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Powell v Alabama 1932
Dennis v US 1951
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
US v Nixon 1974
43. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Clinton v New York 1998
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
44. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Betts v Brady 1942
Schenck v US 1919
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Roe v Wade 1973
45. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Katz v US 1967
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Powell v Alabama 1932
46. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Powell v Alabama 1932
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
47. You can burn the flag
US v Nixon 1974
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Texas v Johnson 1989
Kelo v New London 2005
48. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Mapp v Ohio 1961
49. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katz v US 1967
50. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Baker v Carr 1962
New York Times v US 1971
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987