SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Powell v Alabama 1932
US v Nixon 1974
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
2. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
3. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
US v Eichman 1990
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
4. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Miller v California 1973
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Betts v Brady 1942
5. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Smith v Allwright 1944
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
US v Eichman 1990
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
6. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Korematsu v US 1944
7. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Powell v Alabama 1932
Kelo v New London 2005
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
8. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
9. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
10. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
US v Nixon 1974
Olmstead v US 1928
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
11. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Kelo v New London 2005
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
Korematsu v US 1944
12. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Marbury v Madison 1803
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
13. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Olmstead v US 1928
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Near v Minnesota 1931
14. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dennis v US 1951
Furman v Georgia 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
15. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Near v Minnesota 1931
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Miller v California 1973
16. Separate is not equal
Katz v US 1967
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
17. You can burn the flag
US v Eichman 1990
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
18. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
19. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
20. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
21. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Schenck v US 1919
Kelo v New London 2005
22. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Schenck v US 1919
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
23. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
24. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Gitlow v NY 1925
Marbury v Madison 1803
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
25. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Olmstead v US 1928
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
26. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Clinton v New York 1998
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
27. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Korematsu v US 1944
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
28. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
29. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
30. Right to privacy
Miller v California 1973
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
31. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miller v California 1973
32. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Mapp v Ohio 1961
33. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
34. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Near v Minnesota 1931
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Schenck v US 1919
35. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Engel v Vitale 1962
36. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Weeks v US 1914
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
South Dakota v Dole 1987
37. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Dennis v US 1951
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
38. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Engel v Vitale 1962
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Betts v Brady 1942
39. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Betts v Brady 1942
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Katz v US 1967
40. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gitlow v NY 1925
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Olmstead v US 1928
41. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
42. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
43. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Furman v Georgia 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
44. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
45. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
New York Times v US 1971
46. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
New York Times v US 1971
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dennis v US 1951
Baker v Carr 1962
47. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Betts v Brady 1942
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
48. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Bush v Gore 2000
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
49. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
50. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Weeks v US 1914
Lawrence v Texas 2003
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Katz v US 1967