SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
New York Times v US 1971
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
2. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Miller v California 1973
Bush v Gore 2000
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Powell v Alabama 1932
3. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Kelo v New London 2005
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Virginia v Black 2002
Oregon v Elstad 1985
4. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
United States v Lopez 1995
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
5. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Korematsu v US 1944
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Roe v Wade 1973
6. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Betts v Brady 1942
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Olmstead v US 1928
Baker v Carr 1962
7. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
8. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
Fletcher v Peck 1810
9. Right to privacy
Dennis v US 1951
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
10. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Schenck v US 1919
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Miranda v Arizona 1966
11. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Texas v Johnson 1989
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Katz v US 1967
12. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
13. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
US v Nixon 1974
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Miranda v Arizona 1966
14. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Weeks v US 1914
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
15. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Betts v Brady 1942
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miller v California 1973
Roe v Wade 1973
16. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Fletcher v Peck 1810
17. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Katz v US 1967
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Marbury v Madison 1803
18. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Olmstead v US 1928
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
19. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
20. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katz v US 1967
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
21. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
22. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Furman v Georgia 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
23. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
New York Times v US 1971
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Betts v Brady 1942
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
24. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Engel v Vitale 1962
25. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
26. Separate but equal for races
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
US v Eichman 1990
27. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
28. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Marbury v Madison 1803
29. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Barron v Baltimore 1819
30. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Katz v US 1967
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
31. Established exclusionary rule
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Weeks v US 1914
32. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Katz v US 1967
Kelo v New London 2005
33. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Clinton v New York 1998
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
34. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
35. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Dennis v US 1951
Betts v Brady 1942
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
South Dakota v Dole 1987
36. Separate is not equal
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miranda v Arizona 1966
37. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
38. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Smith v Allwright 1944
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
39. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
40. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Gregg v Georgia 1976
41. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
42. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Marbury v Madison 1803
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
43. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Engel v Vitale 1962
Schenck v US 1919
44. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Furman v Georgia 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Engel v Vitale 1962
45. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Katz v US 1967
US v Nixon 1974
United States v Lopez 1995
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
46. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Miller v California 1973
Lawrence v Texas 2003
47. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
United States v Lopez 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Engel v Vitale 1962
48. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Korematsu v US 1944
Betts v Brady 1942
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
49. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
50. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Lawrence v Texas 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810