SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Miller v California 1973
US v Eichman 1990
United States v Lopez 1995
2. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
Oregon v Elstad 1985
3. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Texas v Johnson 1989
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
4. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
5. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
Furman v Georgia 1972
6. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Miller v California 1973
Korematsu v US 1944
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Furman v Georgia 1972
7. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Roe v Wade 1973
Miller v California 1973
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
8. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Dennis v US 1951
9. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
10. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Smith v Allwright 1944
US v Eichman 1990
11. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Near v Minnesota 1931
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Dennis v US 1951
Roe v Wade 1973
12. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
13. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Weeks v US 1914
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Texas v Johnson 1989
14. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Korematsu v US 1944
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
15. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Virginia v Black 2002
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Kelo v New London 2005
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
16. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Katz v US 1967
Korematsu v US 1944
17. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Kelo v New London 2005
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
18. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Baker v Carr 1962
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Virginia v Black 2002
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
19. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
US v Eichman 1990
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
20. Established judicial review
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Kelo v New London 2005
Powell v Alabama 1932
Marbury v Madison 1803
21. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Schenck v US 1919
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Marbury v Madison 1803
22. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
New York Times v US 1971
Gitlow v NY 1925
Virginia v Black 2002
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
23. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
United States v Lopez 1995
Schenck v US 1919
Texas v Johnson 1989
24. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Korematsu v US 1944
Clinton v New York 1998
25. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Engel v Vitale 1962
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Betts v Brady 1942
Lawrence v Texas 2003
26. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Schenck v US 1919
US v Nixon 1974
27. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Bush v Gore 2000
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
28. Established exclusionary rule
US v Eichman 1990
Weeks v US 1914
Engel v Vitale 1962
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
29. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
30. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Schenck v US 1919
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
31. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
32. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Texas v Johnson 1989
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
33. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
34. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Virginia v Black 2002
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
35. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
36. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Olmstead v US 1928
37. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Texas v Johnson 1989
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
38. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Katz v US 1967
39. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Smith v Allwright 1944
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Schenck v US 1919
40. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Dennis v US 1951
Marbury v Madison 1803
41. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Bush v Gore 2000
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
42. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Roe v Wade 1973
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Engel v Vitale 1962
43. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
United States v Lopez 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
New York Times v US 1971
44. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Texas v Johnson 1989
Powell v Alabama 1932
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Mapp v Ohio 1961
45. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Katz v US 1967
South Dakota v Dole 1987
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
46. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Weeks v US 1914
Texas v Johnson 1989
Kelo v New London 2005
Virginia v Black 2002
47. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
48. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Schenck v US 1919
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
49. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Schenck v US 1919
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
50. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Dennis v US 1951
Clinton v New York 1998