SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Katz v US 1967
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
2. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Weeks v US 1914
3. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
4. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
5. You can burn the flag
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
6. Established judicial review
Clinton v New York 1998
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Marbury v Madison 1803
US v Eichman 1990
7. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Miller v California 1973
Betts v Brady 1942
Virginia v Black 2002
8. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
9. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Miller v California 1973
Buckley v Baleo 1976
10. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Near v Minnesota 1931
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dennis v US 1951
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
11. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
12. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
13. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
US v Nixon 1974
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Powell v Alabama 1932
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
14. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Smith v Allwright 1944
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Miranda v Arizona 1966
15. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Furman v Georgia 1972
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
16. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Marbury v Madison 1803
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
17. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Schenck v US 1919
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
18. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
19. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Weeks v US 1914
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
20. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Katz v US 1967
Oregon v Elstad 1985
21. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Dennis v US 1951
22. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Katz v US 1967
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
23. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Marbury v Madison 1803
Baker v Carr 1962
Powell v Alabama 1932
Katz v US 1967
24. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Virginia v Black 2002
25. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Dennis v US 1951
26. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Roe v Wade 1973
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
27. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
28. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Engel v Vitale 1962
29. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
30. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Near v Minnesota 1931
United States v Lopez 1995
31. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US v Nixon 1974
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Bush v Gore 2000
32. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Roe v Wade 1973
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
33. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Virginia v Black 2002
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
US v Nixon 1974
Dennis v US 1951
34. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Olmstead v US 1928
US v Nixon 1974
Roe v Wade 1973
Schenck v US 1919
35. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
Oregon v Elstad 1985
36. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Gitlow v NY 1925
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bush v Gore 2000
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
37. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
38. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Engel v Vitale 1962
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
39. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Dennis v US 1951
Miller v California 1973
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
40. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Engel v Vitale 1962
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US v Eichman 1990
Oregon v Elstad 1985
41. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Betts v Brady 1942
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Virginia v Black 2002
42. Separate but equal for races
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Gitlow v NY 1925
Virginia v Black 2002
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
43. Established exclusionary rule
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Weeks v US 1914
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Powell v Alabama 1932
44. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Olmstead v US 1928
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
45. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Smith v Allwright 1944
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
46. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Virginia v Black 2002
47. Separate is not equal
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Miller v California 1973
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
48. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Bush v Gore 2000
49. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
50. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Olmstead v US 1928
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Korematsu v US 1944
DeJonge v Oregon 1937