SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Furman v Georgia 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Clinton v New York 1998
2. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Olmstead v US 1928
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Schenck v US 1919
3. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gitlow v NY 1925
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Furman v Georgia 1972
4. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
5. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
6. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Engel v Vitale 1962
7. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Baker v Carr 1962
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
8. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Korematsu v US 1944
New York Times v US 1971
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
9. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
10. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Olmstead v US 1928
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Katz v US 1967
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
11. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
12. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
US v Eichman 1990
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
13. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Gregg v Georgia 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Betts v Brady 1942
US v Nixon 1974
14. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Roe v Wade 1973
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
15. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Bush v Gore 2000
Roe v Wade 1973
16. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Schenck v US 1919
Gitlow v NY 1925
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
17. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
18. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Kelo v New London 2005
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
19. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Virginia v Black 2002
Roe v Wade 1973
Clinton v New York 1998
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
20. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Dennis v US 1951
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
21. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
22. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Miranda v Arizona 1966
United States v Lopez 1995
23. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Miller v California 1973
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Miranda v Arizona 1966
24. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Korematsu v US 1944
Baker v Carr 1962
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
25. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Dennis v US 1951
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
26. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Korematsu v US 1944
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Gitlow v NY 1925
27. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
US v Nixon 1974
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
Bush v Gore 2000
28. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
29. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
30. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Oregon v Elstad 1985
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
31. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Powell v Alabama 1932
32. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
33. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
34. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Virginia v Black 2002
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
35. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Korematsu v US 1944
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Miller v California 1973
Gregg v Georgia 1976
36. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
37. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Kelo v New London 2005
38. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Buckley v Baleo 1976
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
39. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Texas v Johnson 1989
Schenck v US 1919
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
40. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Bush v Gore 2000
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
41. Established exclusionary rule
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Weeks v US 1914
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
42. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Roe v Wade 1973
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
43. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Korematsu v US 1944
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Powell v Alabama 1932
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
44. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
45. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Powell v Alabama 1932
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Bush v Gore 2000
US v Eichman 1990
46. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
US v Eichman 1990
Oregon v Elstad 1985
United States v Lopez 1995
Clinton v New York 1998
47. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Furman v Georgia 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
Katz v US 1967
48. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Texas v Johnson 1989
Smith v Allwright 1944
Roe v Wade 1973
Powell v Alabama 1932
49. Separate is not equal
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Miller v California 1973
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
50. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Grayned v City of rockford 1972