SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Virginia v Black 2002
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
2. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
Miranda v Arizona 1966
3. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Clinton v New York 1998
4. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
New York Times v US 1971
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
5. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Weeks v US 1914
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Clinton v New York 1998
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
6. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
New York Times v US 1971
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
United States v Lopez 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
7. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Betts v Brady 1942
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gitlow v NY 1925
8. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Engel v Vitale 1962
US v Nixon 1974
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
9. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
Roe v Wade 1973
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
10. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
US v Eichman 1990
Bush v Gore 2000
Near v Minnesota 1931
11. Established judicial review
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Fletcher v Peck 1810
12. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Fletcher v Peck 1810
13. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Kelo v New London 2005
Engel v Vitale 1962
United States v Lopez 1995
14. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Miller v California 1973
Virginia v Black 2002
Dennis v US 1951
Roe v Wade 1973
15. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
United States v Lopez 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Engel v Vitale 1962
16. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
United States v Lopez 1995
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Korematsu v US 1944
Miranda v Arizona 1966
17. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Korematsu v US 1944
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
18. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Near v Minnesota 1931
Schenck v US 1919
Baker v Carr 1962
Clinton v New York 1998
19. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Powell v Alabama 1932
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
20. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
New York Times v US 1971
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
21. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Miller v California 1973
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
22. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Korematsu v US 1944
23. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Engel v Vitale 1962
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Fletcher v Peck 1810
24. Separate is not equal
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Schenck v US 1919
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
25. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
26. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
27. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Eichman 1990
Powell v Alabama 1932
28. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Furman v Georgia 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Bush v Gore 2000
29. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US v Nixon 1974
30. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Near v Minnesota 1931
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
United States v Lopez 1995
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
31. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Furman v Georgia 1972
32. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Katz v US 1967
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
33. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
34. Established exclusionary rule
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Miller v California 1973
Weeks v US 1914
35. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
36. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Virginia v Black 2002
Gitlow v NY 1925
37. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Korematsu v US 1944
Near v Minnesota 1931
38. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Baker v Carr 1962
US v Eichman 1990
Kelo v New London 2005
39. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Near v Minnesota 1931
United States v Lopez 1995
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
40. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gitlow v NY 1925
Engel v Vitale 1962
41. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Gitlow v NY 1925
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
42. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
43. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
Oregon v Elstad 1985
44. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Korematsu v US 1944
Gitlow v NY 1925
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
45. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Near v Minnesota 1931
46. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
47. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katz v US 1967
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
48. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Near v Minnesota 1931
49. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Miranda v Arizona 1966
New York Times v US 1971
US v Eichman 1990
Fletcher v Peck 1810
50. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Schenck v US 1919
US v Eichman 1990