SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Clinton v New York 1998
2. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Furman v Georgia 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
United States v Lopez 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
3. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Virginia v Black 2002
4. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Weeks v US 1914
5. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US v Nixon 1974
6. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
7. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
US v Eichman 1990
Engel v Vitale 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
8. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Oregon v Elstad 1985
9. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Katz v US 1967
Clinton v New York 1998
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
10. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
11. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
US v Nixon 1974
12. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
13. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Gitlow v NY 1925
Miller v California 1973
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
14. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
15. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Bush v Gore 2000
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Kelo v New London 2005
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
16. Established judicial review
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
17. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Bush v Gore 2000
Clinton v New York 1998
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
18. Separate but equal for races
Clinton v New York 1998
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
19. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Weeks v US 1914
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
20. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Engel v Vitale 1962
Powell v Alabama 1932
21. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Marbury v Madison 1803
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
22. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miller v California 1973
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
23. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Powell v Alabama 1932
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Clinton v New York 1998
Miller v California 1973
24. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Powell v Alabama 1932
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
25. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
26. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Marbury v Madison 1803
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Olmstead v US 1928
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
27. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Katz v US 1967
28. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Baker v Carr 1962
29. Separate is not equal
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Marbury v Madison 1803
Fletcher v Peck 1810
30. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Texas v Johnson 1989
31. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Olmstead v US 1928
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
32. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Near v Minnesota 1931
33. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
34. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Furman v Georgia 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
35. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Powell v Alabama 1932
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
36. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Engel v Vitale 1962
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Olmstead v US 1928
Near v Minnesota 1931
37. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Betts v Brady 1942
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
38. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US v Nixon 1974
Miller v California 1973
39. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Virginia v Black 2002
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
40. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
41. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
42. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Smith v Allwright 1944
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Olmstead v US 1928
43. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Near v Minnesota 1931
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Roe v Wade 1973
44. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Dennis v US 1951
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
45. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
46. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
47. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Kelo v New London 2005
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
48. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Baker v Carr 1962
New York Times v US 1971
49. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Korematsu v US 1944
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
50. Established exclusionary rule
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Weeks v US 1914
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988