SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Powell v Alabama 1932
United States v Lopez 1995
2. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Korematsu v US 1944
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
3. Right to privacy
New York Times v US 1971
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
4. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lawrence v Texas 2003
5. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
6. Established judicial review
Powell v Alabama 1932
Miller v California 1973
New York Times v US 1971
Marbury v Madison 1803
7. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Katz v US 1967
8. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
9. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Schenck v US 1919
Miller v California 1973
10. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Miller v California 1973
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
11. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Near v Minnesota 1931
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Clinton v New York 1998
12. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Clinton v New York 1998
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
13. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
14. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
New York Times v US 1971
15. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
16. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Weeks v US 1914
Near v Minnesota 1931
Korematsu v US 1944
Olmstead v US 1928
17. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Baker v Carr 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
18. Separate but equal for races
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Powell v Alabama 1932
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
19. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Dennis v US 1951
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
20. Separate is not equal
US v Eichman 1990
Olmstead v US 1928
Miller v California 1973
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
21. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Engel v Vitale 1962
22. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
23. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Engel v Vitale 1962
24. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Miller v California 1973
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
25. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Lawrence v Texas 2003
26. You can burn the flag
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Texas v Johnson 1989
27. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
28. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Virginia v Black 2002
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
29. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Near v Minnesota 1931
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
30. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Korematsu v US 1944
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Texas v Johnson 1989
Roe v Wade 1973
31. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
32. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
United States v Lopez 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
33. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Weeks v US 1914
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
34. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Virginia v Black 2002
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
US v Nixon 1974
35. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Betts v Brady 1942
36. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
37. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Near v Minnesota 1931
Texas v Johnson 1989
Kelo v New London 2005
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
38. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
39. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Roe v Wade 1973
Bush v Gore 2000
Buckley v Baleo 1976
40. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
41. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Weeks v US 1914
Baker v Carr 1962
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Near v Minnesota 1931
42. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Weeks v US 1914
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
43. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Dennis v US 1951
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
44. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Barron v Baltimore 1819
45. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US v Eichman 1990
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Barron v Baltimore 1819
46. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
Virginia v Black 2002
Baker v Carr 1962
47. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Bush v Gore 2000
48. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
49. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
US v Eichman 1990
50. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Tinker v Des Moines 1969