SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Katz v US 1967
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gitlow v NY 1925
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
2. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Buckley v Baleo 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
3. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
4. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
5. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
New York Times v US 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US v Eichman 1990
6. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Virginia v Black 2002
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Bush v Gore 2000
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
7. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
US v Eichman 1990
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
8. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Weeks v US 1914
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
9. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Near v Minnesota 1931
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
10. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Betts v Brady 1942
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
US v Nixon 1974
11. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Korematsu v US 1944
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Baker v Carr 1962
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
12. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
13. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Virginia v Black 2002
Gitlow v NY 1925
Texas v Johnson 1989
Mapp v Ohio 1961
14. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Schenck v US 1919
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
15. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
United States v Lopez 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Miller v California 1973
16. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Marbury v Madison 1803
17. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
US v Eichman 1990
18. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Miller v California 1973
Clinton v New York 1998
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
19. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Roe v Wade 1973
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
United States v Lopez 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
20. Established exclusionary rule
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Weeks v US 1914
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
21. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Gitlow v NY 1925
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
22. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
United States v Lopez 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
23. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Engel v Vitale 1962
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
South Dakota v Dole 1987
24. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US v Eichman 1990
25. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Near v Minnesota 1931
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Furman v Georgia 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
26. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Katz v US 1967
Buckley v Baleo 1976
27. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Miller v California 1973
Near v Minnesota 1931
28. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Marbury v Madison 1803
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
29. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Dennis v US 1951
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Oregon v Elstad 1985
30. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
31. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Near v Minnesota 1931
32. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Olmstead v US 1928
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Near v Minnesota 1931
33. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
34. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Powell v Alabama 1932
Marbury v Madison 1803
Baker v Carr 1962
35. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
36. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
US v Nixon 1974
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
37. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Dennis v US 1951
38. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
39. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Weeks v US 1914
New York Times v US 1971
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
40. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
United States v Lopez 1995
US v Nixon 1974
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
41. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Roe v Wade 1973
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Miller v California 1973
Powell v Alabama 1932
42. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
43. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
44. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Korematsu v US 1944
Roe v Wade 1973
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
45. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
46. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Dennis v US 1951
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
47. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
48. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
49. Separate is not equal
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Weeks v US 1914
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
50. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Olmstead v US 1928