SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
2. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Barron v Baltimore 1819
New York Times v US 1971
3. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Kelo v New London 2005
4. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Katz v US 1967
5. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
Weeks v US 1914
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
6. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US v Nixon 1974
7. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Clinton v New York 1998
Powell v Alabama 1932
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
8. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Marbury v Madison 1803
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
9. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Bush v Gore 2000
Korematsu v US 1944
United States v Lopez 1995
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
10. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Olmstead v US 1928
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
11. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Virginia v Black 2002
Betts v Brady 1942
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
12. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Engel v Vitale 1962
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Miller v California 1973
Miranda v Arizona 1966
13. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Engel v Vitale 1962
New York Times v US 1971
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
14. Separate but equal for races
Miller v California 1973
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
15. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Dennis v US 1951
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Betts v Brady 1942
16. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
17. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
18. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Kelo v New London 2005
Korematsu v US 1944
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Baker v Carr 1962
19. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Furman v Georgia 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
20. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
21. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Mapp v Ohio 1961
New York Times v US 1971
22. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Kelo v New London 2005
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Marbury v Madison 1803
23. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Baker v Carr 1962
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
24. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
25. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Miranda v Arizona 1966
26. Established exclusionary rule
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gitlow v NY 1925
Weeks v US 1914
27. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
US v Nixon 1974
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
28. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Buckley v Baleo 1976
29. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Roe v Wade 1973
Oregon v Elstad 1985
30. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Olmstead v US 1928
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Katz v US 1967
31. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Schenck v US 1919
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Roe v Wade 1973
Mapp v Ohio 1961
32. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
33. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Smith v Allwright 1944
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Furman v Georgia 1972
34. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
35. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Betts v Brady 1942
Baker v Carr 1962
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
36. Right to privacy
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Furman v Georgia 1972
37. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
38. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
39. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Katz v US 1967
40. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
41. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
42. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
43. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gregg v Georgia 1976
44. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Olmstead v US 1928
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
45. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
46. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
47. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
48. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
49. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Clinton v New York 1998
Olmstead v US 1928
50. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Miller v California 1973
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Katzenbach v McClung 1964