SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Kelo v New London 2005
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Katz v US 1967
Olmstead v US 1928
2. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
3. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Schenck v US 1919
Lawrence v Texas 2003
4. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
5. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Clinton v New York 1998
6. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Nixon 1974
US v Eichman 1990
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
7. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
New York Times v US 1971
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
8. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Schenck v US 1919
Gitlow v NY 1925
Engel v Vitale 1962
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
9. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
10. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Near v Minnesota 1931
11. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
12. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Smith v Allwright 1944
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Engel v Vitale 1962
13. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Clinton v New York 1998
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
14. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Olmstead v US 1928
Powell v Alabama 1932
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Miller v California 1973
15. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Powell v Alabama 1932
South Dakota v Dole 1987
16. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lawrence v Texas 2003
17. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Dennis v US 1951
18. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Engel v Vitale 1962
Baker v Carr 1962
Gitlow v NY 1925
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
19. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Bush v Gore 2000
US v Nixon 1974
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Kelo v New London 2005
20. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Furman v Georgia 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
21. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
22. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Near v Minnesota 1931
Betts v Brady 1942
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
23. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Bush v Gore 2000
Texas v Johnson 1989
Smith v Allwright 1944
Virginia v Black 2002
24. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Kelo v New London 2005
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
25. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Baker v Carr 1962
26. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Schenck v US 1919
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Korematsu v US 1944
27. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
US v Eichman 1990
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dennis v US 1951
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
28. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Katz v US 1967
29. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
30. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Roe v Wade 1973
31. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
32. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Gitlow v NY 1925
Buckley v Baleo 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Clinton v New York 1998
33. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Marbury v Madison 1803
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
34. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Katz v US 1967
35. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Powell v Alabama 1932
Roe v Wade 1973
Engel v Vitale 1962
36. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Kelo v New London 2005
Furman v Georgia 1972
37. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
US v Nixon 1974
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Powell v Alabama 1932
38. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Schenck v US 1919
New York Times v US 1971
Dennis v US 1951
Near v Minnesota 1931
39. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Dennis v US 1951
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
40. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
41. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
42. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Roe v Wade 1973
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
43. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Smith v Allwright 1944
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Dennis v US 1951
44. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Gitlow v NY 1925
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
45. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Betts v Brady 1942
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
46. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Smith v Allwright 1944
Marbury v Madison 1803
Bush v Gore 2000
Roe v Wade 1973
47. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Roe v Wade 1973
Baker v Carr 1962
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
48. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Schenck v US 1919
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
49. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Fletcher v Peck 1810
50. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Texas v Johnson 1989
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Lawrence v Texas 2003