SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
2. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Clinton v New York 1998
3. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
4. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Furman v Georgia 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
Betts v Brady 1942
5. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Betts v Brady 1942
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
6. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
US v Nixon 1974
Clinton v New York 1998
Roe v Wade 1973
7. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Betts v Brady 1942
8. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Near v Minnesota 1931
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
9. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Kelo v New London 2005
10. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Clinton v New York 1998
11. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Gregg v Georgia 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
12. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
United States v Lopez 1995
Korematsu v US 1944
13. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
14. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Olmstead v US 1928
Virginia v Black 2002
15. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Schenck v US 1919
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
16. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
17. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Bush v Gore 2000
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
18. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Furman v Georgia 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Powell v Alabama 1932
19. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
US v Nixon 1974
Virginia v Black 2002
Schenck v US 1919
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
20. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katz v US 1967
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
21. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
22. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Bush v Gore 2000
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Kelo v New London 2005
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
23. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
United States v Lopez 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
US v Nixon 1974
Weeks v US 1914
24. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US v Eichman 1990
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
25. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
26. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
US v Eichman 1990
Miranda v Arizona 1966
United States v Lopez 1995
Bush v Gore 2000
27. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
28. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Engel v Vitale 1962
Dennis v US 1951
Virginia v Black 2002
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
29. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
US v Nixon 1974
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
United States v Lopez 1995
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
30. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Korematsu v US 1944
31. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Barron v Baltimore 1819
32. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Texas v Johnson 1989
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
New York Times v US 1971
Oregon v Elstad 1985
33. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Roe v Wade 1973
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Buckley v Baleo 1976
34. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Near v Minnesota 1931
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Korematsu v US 1944
35. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Weeks v US 1914
Powell v Alabama 1932
36. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Korematsu v US 1944
Olmstead v US 1928
37. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
US v Eichman 1990
Texas v Johnson 1989
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
38. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
New York Times v US 1971
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
39. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
40. Separate is not equal
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
United States v Lopez 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
41. Established judicial review
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Marbury v Madison 1803
Texas v Johnson 1989
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
42. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Korematsu v US 1944
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Baker v Carr 1962
43. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Bush v Gore 2000
44. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Kelo v New London 2005
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
45. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Powell v Alabama 1932
New York Times v US 1971
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
46. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dennis v US 1951
47. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Marbury v Madison 1803
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Engel v Vitale 1962
48. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Engel v Vitale 1962
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
49. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Miller v California 1973
Weeks v US 1914
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Katz v US 1967
50. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests