SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Katz v US 1967
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
2. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
3. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Gregg v Georgia 1976
4. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Texas v Johnson 1989
Engel v Vitale 1962
US v Nixon 1974
Near v Minnesota 1931
5. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Olmstead v US 1928
6. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
7. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Near v Minnesota 1931
New York Times v US 1971
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
South Dakota v Dole 1987
8. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
United States v Lopez 1995
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
New York Times v US 1971
Kelo v New London 2005
9. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Korematsu v US 1944
10. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
New York Times v US 1971
Roe v Wade 1973
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Near v Minnesota 1931
11. Established exclusionary rule
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Marbury v Madison 1803
Weeks v US 1914
12. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Dennis v US 1951
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
13. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Fletcher v Peck 1810
14. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Miller v California 1973
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Miranda v Arizona 1966
15. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
16. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Olmstead v US 1928
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
17. Separate but equal for races
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Virginia v Black 2002
18. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Barron v Baltimore 1819
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Clinton v New York 1998
19. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Clinton v New York 1998
20. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Betts v Brady 1942
Engel v Vitale 1962
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
21. Established judicial review
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Near v Minnesota 1931
Marbury v Madison 1803
Betts v Brady 1942
22. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
23. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katz v US 1967
Kelo v New London 2005
24. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Mapp v Ohio 1961
25. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bush v Gore 2000
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
26. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Virginia v Black 2002
Marbury v Madison 1803
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Katz v US 1967
27. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Baker v Carr 1962
28. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Dennis v US 1951
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Bush v Gore 2000
Marbury v Madison 1803
29. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US v Nixon 1974
30. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
31. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Kelo v New London 2005
Clinton v New York 1998
Gregg v Georgia 1976
32. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
US v Eichman 1990
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
Powell v Alabama 1932
33. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
New York Times v US 1971
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
South Dakota v Dole 1987
34. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Oregon v Elstad 1985
35. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dennis v US 1951
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
36. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
37. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
38. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Miller v California 1973
39. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
40. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
41. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Miller v California 1973
Buckley v Baleo 1976
42. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
US v Eichman 1990
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
43. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Furman v Georgia 1972
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Korematsu v US 1944
44. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dennis v US 1951
Betts v Brady 1942
45. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
United States v Lopez 1995
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gitlow v NY 1925
Buckley v Baleo 1976
46. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Smith v Allwright 1944
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
47. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Virginia v Black 2002
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
United States v Lopez 1995
48. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Smith v Allwright 1944
Schenck v US 1919
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
49. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Texas v Johnson 1989
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
50. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Korematsu v US 1944
Betts v Brady 1942
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Katzenbach v McClung 1964