SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
Texas v Johnson 1989
2. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
3. Established judicial review
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
Schenck v US 1919
4. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Kelo v New London 2005
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
5. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
6. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Clinton v New York 1998
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
South Dakota v Dole 1987
7. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Texas v Johnson 1989
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
8. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Miller v California 1973
Bush v Gore 2000
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
9. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Korematsu v US 1944
Dennis v US 1951
10. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
US v Eichman 1990
11. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Near v Minnesota 1931
12. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Kelo v New London 2005
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
United States v Lopez 1995
13. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bush v Gore 2000
Powell v Alabama 1932
Korematsu v US 1944
14. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Oregon v Elstad 1985
15. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Gitlow v NY 1925
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
United States v Lopez 1995
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
16. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
17. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Schenck v US 1919
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
18. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Furman v Georgia 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
19. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
20. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Korematsu v US 1944
United States v Lopez 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
21. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
22. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Texas v Johnson 1989
Clinton v New York 1998
Katz v US 1967
23. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Katz v US 1967
Mapp v Ohio 1961
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
24. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
Schenck v US 1919
25. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Dennis v US 1951
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Roe v Wade 1973
New York Times v US 1971
26. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
27. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Weeks v US 1914
Miller v California 1973
28. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Engel v Vitale 1962
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
29. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Schenck v US 1919
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
30. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
United States v Lopez 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Schenck v US 1919
31. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Mapp v Ohio 1961
32. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Engel v Vitale 1962
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
33. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
34. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Near v Minnesota 1931
Olmstead v US 1928
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
35. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Katz v US 1967
Schenck v US 1919
US v Nixon 1974
Kelo v New London 2005
36. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
37. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Schenck v US 1919
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
38. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
Roe v Wade 1973
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
39. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
40. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
41. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Kelo v New London 2005
42. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
New York Times v US 1971
US v Nixon 1974
Buckley v Baleo 1976
43. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Clinton v New York 1998
Korematsu v US 1944
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
44. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Kelo v New London 2005
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Near v Minnesota 1931
45. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Near v Minnesota 1931
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Clinton v New York 1998
46. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
47. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
48. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Weeks v US 1914
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
49. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Clinton v New York 1998
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
50. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gitlow v NY 1925
Smith v Allwright 1944