SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Smith v Allwright 1944
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
2. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
US v Eichman 1990
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Weeks v US 1914
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
3. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
4. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Virginia v Black 2002
Gitlow v NY 1925
5. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
6. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Korematsu v US 1944
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Roe v Wade 1973
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
7. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
Smith v Allwright 1944
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
8. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
9. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
US v Eichman 1990
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Bush v Gore 2000
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
10. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Weeks v US 1914
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Katz v US 1967
11. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
12. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Dennis v US 1951
13. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Texas v Johnson 1989
Oregon v Elstad 1985
14. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
15. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
16. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Baker v Carr 1962
US v Nixon 1974
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Lawrence v Texas 2003
17. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Clinton v New York 1998
Baker v Carr 1962
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Korematsu v US 1944
18. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
Texas v Johnson 1989
19. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
20. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Furman v Georgia 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
21. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Powell v Alabama 1932
22. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
US v Nixon 1974
Barron v Baltimore 1819
New York Times v US 1971
Katz v US 1967
23. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Virginia v Black 2002
24. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
25. You can burn the flag
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Weeks v US 1914
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
26. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
27. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Dennis v US 1951
28. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Near v Minnesota 1931
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
29. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Katz v US 1967
Smith v Allwright 1944
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
30. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Olmstead v US 1928
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
Powell v Alabama 1932
31. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
United States v Lopez 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
32. Separate is not equal
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Schenck v US 1919
33. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
US v Eichman 1990
Schenck v US 1919
34. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Lawrence v Texas 2003
35. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
New York Times v US 1971
36. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US v Eichman 1990
Texas v Johnson 1989
37. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Virginia v Black 2002
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Near v Minnesota 1931
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
38. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
US v Nixon 1974
Fletcher v Peck 1810
39. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Baker v Carr 1962
40. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Korematsu v US 1944
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
41. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Schenck v US 1919
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
42. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Virginia v Black 2002
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Bush v Gore 2000
43. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
44. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Dennis v US 1951
Katz v US 1967
Baker v Carr 1962
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
45. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
46. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Betts v Brady 1942
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
47. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
48. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Dennis v US 1951
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
49. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
United States v Lopez 1995
Schenck v US 1919
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
50. Right to privacy
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Katz v US 1967
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Korematsu v US 1944