SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Katz v US 1967
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
2. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Near v Minnesota 1931
Kelo v New London 2005
3. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
4. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Powell v Alabama 1932
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
5. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Katz v US 1967
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Baker v Carr 1962
6. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
Fletcher v Peck 1810
7. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US v Nixon 1974
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
8. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Baker v Carr 1962
9. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
10. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Weeks v US 1914
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
11. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Baker v Carr 1962
Kelo v New London 2005
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
12. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Schenck v US 1919
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Engel v Vitale 1962
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
13. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Baker v Carr 1962
Powell v Alabama 1932
Kelo v New London 2005
14. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Marbury v Madison 1803
New York Times v US 1971
Schenck v US 1919
15. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Roe v Wade 1973
Miller v California 1973
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
16. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
New York Times v US 1971
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
17. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Engel v Vitale 1962
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
18. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Clinton v New York 1998
Baker v Carr 1962
19. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Kelo v New London 2005
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Marbury v Madison 1803
20. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Clinton v New York 1998
Marbury v Madison 1803
Bush v Gore 2000
21. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
22. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Roe v Wade 1973
23. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Weeks v US 1914
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Texas v Johnson 1989
24. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US v Nixon 1974
25. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Smith v Allwright 1944
Katz v US 1967
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
26. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
27. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Olmstead v US 1928
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
28. Established judicial review
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
Bush v Gore 2000
Virginia v Black 2002
29. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Powell v Alabama 1932
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
South Dakota v Dole 1987
30. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
31. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
32. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
33. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
34. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bush v Gore 2000
35. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Furman v Georgia 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
36. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
37. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Korematsu v US 1944
Furman v Georgia 1972
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Engel v Vitale 1962
38. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
US v Eichman 1990
Oregon v Elstad 1985
39. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Schenck v US 1919
40. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
41. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
42. Separate but equal for races
Olmstead v US 1928
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
43. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Mapp v Ohio 1961
US v Eichman 1990
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
44. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
45. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
United States v Lopez 1995
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
46. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Korematsu v US 1944
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
47. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gitlow v NY 1925
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
48. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Miller v California 1973
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
49. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
United States v Lopez 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
50. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Engel v Vitale 1962
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Plessy v Ferguson 1896