SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
2. Separate is not equal
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Olmstead v US 1928
Gitlow v NY 1925
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
3. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Furman v Georgia 1972
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
4. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
5. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
6. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Miranda v Arizona 1966
7. Established exclusionary rule
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Weeks v US 1914
Lawrence v Texas 2003
8. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Betts v Brady 1942
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Schenck v US 1919
9. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Roe v Wade 1973
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Smith v Allwright 1944
10. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Schenck v US 1919
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
11. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
12. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
13. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Furman v Georgia 1972
14. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Clinton v New York 1998
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
15. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Roe v Wade 1973
Gitlow v NY 1925
16. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
United States v Lopez 1995
US v Eichman 1990
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v US 1971
17. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Smith v Allwright 1944
Olmstead v US 1928
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
18. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Engel v Vitale 1962
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Katz v US 1967
Korematsu v US 1944
19. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
New York Times v US 1971
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
20. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Baker v Carr 1962
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
21. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Virginia v Black 2002
22. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Fletcher v Peck 1810
New York Times v US 1971
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
23. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Furman v Georgia 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Near v Minnesota 1931
Buckley v Baleo 1976
24. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Near v Minnesota 1931
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
25. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
26. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Marbury v Madison 1803
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
27. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
28. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Olmstead v US 1928
US v Eichman 1990
Miller v California 1973
29. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Near v Minnesota 1931
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
30. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
31. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
32. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Kelo v New London 2005
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
33. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Weeks v US 1914
34. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Miranda v Arizona 1966
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
35. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bush v Gore 2000
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
36. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Lawrence v Texas 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
37. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
US v Nixon 1974
Gitlow v NY 1925
38. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Baker v Carr 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
39. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Marbury v Madison 1803
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
40. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
41. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Smith v Allwright 1944
New York Times v US 1971
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
42. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
43. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
US v Eichman 1990
Kelo v New London 2005
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gitlow v NY 1925
44. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Miller v California 1973
South Dakota v Dole 1987
45. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
46. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Katz v US 1967
47. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Dennis v US 1951
48. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
49. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Virginia v Black 2002
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Furman v Georgia 1972
50. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US v Eichman 1990
Smith v Allwright 1944