SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
2. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Engel v Vitale 1962
Texas v Johnson 1989
3. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Engel v Vitale 1962
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
4. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Korematsu v US 1944
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
5. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Korematsu v US 1944
Dennis v US 1951
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
South Dakota v Dole 1987
6. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Furman v Georgia 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Schenck v US 1919
7. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
8. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Virginia v Black 2002
US v Nixon 1974
Weeks v US 1914
9. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Dennis v US 1951
10. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
United States v Lopez 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
11. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Baker v Carr 1962
US v Nixon 1974
12. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Gitlow v NY 1925
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Baker v Carr 1962
13. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Korematsu v US 1944
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Clinton v New York 1998
14. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
New York Times v US 1971
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
15. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Weeks v US 1914
16. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
United States v Lopez 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
17. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Virginia v Black 2002
18. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Clinton v New York 1998
United States v Lopez 1995
19. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Miller v California 1973
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US v Nixon 1974
20. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
US v Nixon 1974
Kelo v New London 2005
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
21. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Korematsu v US 1944
Betts v Brady 1942
US v Eichman 1990
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
22. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Buckley v Baleo 1976
23. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
Korematsu v US 1944
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
24. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Schenck v US 1919
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
25. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Smith v Allwright 1944
26. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Powell v Alabama 1932
Olmstead v US 1928
Schenck v US 1919
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
27. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
28. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Baker v Carr 1962
Roe v Wade 1973
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
29. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Roe v Wade 1973
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
30. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
31. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Smith v Allwright 1944
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Virginia v Black 2002
32. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Smith v Allwright 1944
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
New York Times v US 1971
33. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
34. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Dennis v US 1951
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Roe v Wade 1973
35. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Miller v California 1973
36. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Gitlow v NY 1925
37. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Clinton v New York 1998
Weeks v US 1914
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
38. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
United States v Lopez 1995
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
39. Established exclusionary rule
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Weeks v US 1914
40. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Texas v Johnson 1989
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Lawrence v Texas 2003
41. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Kelo v New London 2005
United States v Lopez 1995
Clinton v New York 1998
42. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Roe v Wade 1973
Schenck v US 1919
Miller v California 1973
43. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Furman v Georgia 1972
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
44. You can burn the flag
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Texas v Johnson 1989
Mapp v Ohio 1961
45. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Baker v Carr 1962
Betts v Brady 1942
46. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
47. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US v Eichman 1990
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
48. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Korematsu v US 1944
US v Eichman 1990
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
49. Right to privacy
United States v Lopez 1995
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Powell v Alabama 1932
50. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Grayned v City of rockford 1972