SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Clinton v New York 1998
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
2. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Virginia v Black 2002
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Buckley v Baleo 1976
3. You can burn the flag
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Clinton v New York 1998
Texas v Johnson 1989
4. Established judicial review
United States v Lopez 1995
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
5. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
United States v Lopez 1995
Oregon v Elstad 1985
6. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Roe v Wade 1973
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Olmstead v US 1928
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
7. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Miller v California 1973
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Gregg v Georgia 1976
8. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Miranda v Arizona 1966
US v Nixon 1974
9. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
10. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
South Dakota v Dole 1987
11. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Virginia v Black 2002
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Fletcher v Peck 1810
12. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
South Dakota v Dole 1987
13. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Near v Minnesota 1931
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Mapp v Ohio 1961
14. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Clinton v New York 1998
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
15. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Kelo v New London 2005
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
16. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Roe v Wade 1973
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Lawrence v Texas 2003
New York Times v US 1971
17. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Powell v Alabama 1932
Furman v Georgia 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
18. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
United States v Lopez 1995
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
19. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Marbury v Madison 1803
Kelo v New London 2005
Furman v Georgia 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
20. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Korematsu v US 1944
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
21. Established exclusionary rule
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Weeks v US 1914
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Bush v Gore 2000
22. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Powell v Alabama 1932
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
Olmstead v US 1928
23. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Roe v Wade 1973
Virginia v Black 2002
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
24. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
New York Times v US 1971
Virginia v Black 2002
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
25. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
New York Times v US 1971
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
26. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Virginia v Black 2002
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Dennis v US 1951
Engel v Vitale 1962
27. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gitlow v NY 1925
Virginia v Black 2002
28. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Bush v Gore 2000
New York Times v US 1971
Schenck v US 1919
Katz v US 1967
29. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
New York Times v US 1971
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
30. Right to privacy
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
31. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Olmstead v US 1928
Miller v California 1973
32. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Engel v Vitale 1962
US v Eichman 1990
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
33. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Miller v California 1973
34. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Korematsu v US 1944
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Baker v Carr 1962
US v Nixon 1974
35. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
New York Times v US 1971
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
36. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Dennis v US 1951
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
37. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
38. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
US v Eichman 1990
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
US v Nixon 1974
39. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miller v California 1973
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
40. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
Bush v Gore 2000
41. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
New York Times v US 1971
Buckley v Baleo 1976
42. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
Furman v Georgia 1972
43. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
44. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miller v California 1973
Near v Minnesota 1931
Texas v Johnson 1989
45. Separate but equal for races
Powell v Alabama 1932
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Korematsu v US 1944
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
46. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
47. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Dennis v US 1951
48. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Miranda v Arizona 1966
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Clinton v New York 1998
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
49. Separate is not equal
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miller v California 1973
50. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Katz v US 1967
Olmstead v US 1928
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Grayned v City of rockford 1972