SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Bush v Gore 2000
2. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Engel v Vitale 1962
Smith v Allwright 1944
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
3. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Texas v Johnson 1989
Kelo v New London 2005
Weeks v US 1914
New York Times v US 1971
4. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Powell v Alabama 1932
Roe v Wade 1973
Miller v California 1973
5. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
Near v Minnesota 1931
6. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
US v Eichman 1990
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
7. Established judicial review
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Marbury v Madison 1803
Buckley v Baleo 1976
8. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
United States v Lopez 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
9. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Korematsu v US 1944
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
10. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
11. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
12. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
New York Times v US 1971
Bush v Gore 2000
13. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Schenck v US 1919
14. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
15. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
16. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
US v Nixon 1974
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Miller v California 1973
17. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Weeks v US 1914
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Furman v Georgia 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
18. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Schenck v US 1919
19. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
20. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Katz v US 1967
United States v Lopez 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
Olmstead v US 1928
21. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
22. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Smith v Allwright 1944
Korematsu v US 1944
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
23. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Miller v California 1973
US v Nixon 1974
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
24. Right to privacy
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US v Nixon 1974
25. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Miller v California 1973
Bush v Gore 2000
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
26. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
27. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Furman v Georgia 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
28. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Gitlow v NY 1925
Texas v Johnson 1989
Korematsu v US 1944
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
29. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Olmstead v US 1928
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Engel v Vitale 1962
Katz v US 1967
30. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Miranda v Arizona 1966
US v Nixon 1974
31. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Baker v Carr 1962
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Katz v US 1967
32. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Bush v Gore 2000
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Miller v California 1973
Lawrence v Texas 2003
33. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Clinton v New York 1998
Weeks v US 1914
Fletcher v Peck 1810
34. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gregg v Georgia 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
35. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Powell v Alabama 1932
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
36. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Dennis v US 1951
Roe v Wade 1973
37. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Virginia v Black 2002
Weeks v US 1914
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
38. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
39. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Powell v Alabama 1932
Bush v Gore 2000
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
40. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
41. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Bush v Gore 2000
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
42. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Barron v Baltimore 1819
US v Nixon 1974
Korematsu v US 1944
Baker v Carr 1962
43. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Katz v US 1967
Kelo v New London 2005
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
44. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
US v Nixon 1974
45. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Baker v Carr 1962
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miller v California 1973
US v Nixon 1974
46. Established exclusionary rule
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Weeks v US 1914
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
47. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Furman v Georgia 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
48. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Dennis v US 1951
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Texas v Johnson 1989
49. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
50. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Bush v Gore 2000
Miller v California 1973
New York Times v Sullivan 1964