SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
2. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
3. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Bush v Gore 2000
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Miller v California 1973
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
4. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
United States v Lopez 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
5. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Kelo v New London 2005
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Betts v Brady 1942
6. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Texas v Johnson 1989
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
7. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
US v Eichman 1990
Virginia v Black 2002
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Barron v Baltimore 1819
8. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
United States v Lopez 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
9. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Baker v Carr 1962
Olmstead v US 1928
10. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Olmstead v US 1928
Gitlow v NY 1925
Furman v Georgia 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
11. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
12. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Roe v Wade 1973
US v Eichman 1990
Katz v US 1967
13. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Baker v Carr 1962
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
14. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Katz v US 1967
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
15. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Bush v Gore 2000
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
16. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
17. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
18. Separate is not equal
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Bush v Gore 2000
19. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Smith v Allwright 1944
New York Times v US 1971
Clinton v New York 1998
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
20. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miller v California 1973
Fletcher v Peck 1810
21. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
Bush v Gore 2000
22. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Bush v Gore 2000
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Powell v Alabama 1932
Korematsu v US 1944
23. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
Lawrence v Texas 2003
24. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
25. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
New York Times v US 1971
Dennis v US 1951
26. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Clinton v New York 1998
New York Times v US 1971
US v Eichman 1990
27. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
United States v Lopez 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Virginia v Black 2002
28. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Virginia v Black 2002
Powell v Alabama 1932
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Betts v Brady 1942
29. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Engel v Vitale 1962
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
30. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Weeks v US 1914
31. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
32. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
33. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Weeks v US 1914
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
34. You can burn the flag
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
35. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Weeks v US 1914
36. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Schenck v US 1919
Miller v California 1973
US v Eichman 1990
37. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
New York Times v US 1971
United States v Lopez 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Virginia v Black 2002
38. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Clinton v New York 1998
New York Times v US 1971
39. Right to privacy
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
40. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Smith v Allwright 1944
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
41. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
42. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
US v Eichman 1990
Texas v Johnson 1989
Engel v Vitale 1962
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
43. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Virginia v Black 2002
Powell v Alabama 1932
44. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Baker v Carr 1962
45. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Schenck v US 1919
Bush v Gore 2000
46. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Schenck v US 1919
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
47. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Clinton v New York 1998
48. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US v Nixon 1974
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
49. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Texas v Johnson 1989
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Kelo v New London 2005
Betts v Brady 1942
50. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Barron v Baltimore 1819
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests