SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Furman v Georgia 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
2. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gitlow v NY 1925
3. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
4. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Baker v Carr 1962
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Roe v Wade 1973
5. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Weeks v US 1914
Katz v US 1967
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
6. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Virginia v Black 2002
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
South Dakota v Dole 1987
7. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Betts v Brady 1942
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
8. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Furman v Georgia 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
9. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
10. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
11. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Bush v Gore 2000
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
United States v Lopez 1995
12. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Schenck v US 1919
13. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
14. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
15. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Clinton v New York 1998
Betts v Brady 1942
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Schenck v US 1919
16. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
South Dakota v Dole 1987
17. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
18. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Katz v US 1967
19. Right to privacy
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Kelo v New London 2005
20. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
21. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
US v Nixon 1974
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Mapp v Ohio 1961
22. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Dennis v US 1951
Baker v Carr 1962
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
23. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Katz v US 1967
Clinton v New York 1998
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Fletcher v Peck 1810
24. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Texas v Johnson 1989
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
25. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
26. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US v Nixon 1974
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
27. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Dennis v US 1951
Clinton v New York 1998
Smith v Allwright 1944
Baker v Carr 1962
28. You can burn the flag
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
29. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Schenck v US 1919
Marbury v Madison 1803
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
30. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Katz v US 1967
Kelo v New London 2005
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
31. Separate but equal for races
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
32. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Dennis v US 1951
33. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Powell v Alabama 1932
Texas v Johnson 1989
34. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Betts v Brady 1942
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Roe v Wade 1973
Smith v Allwright 1944
35. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Near v Minnesota 1931
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Dennis v US 1951
36. Separate is not equal
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
37. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Kelo v New London 2005
New York Times v US 1971
38. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Eichman 1990
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Fletcher v Peck 1810
39. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
US v Nixon 1974
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
40. Established judicial review
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
41. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
42. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
43. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Baker v Carr 1962
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
44. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Clinton v New York 1998
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Roe v Wade 1973
45. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
46. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Betts v Brady 1942
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
47. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Near v Minnesota 1931
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
48. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Korematsu v US 1944
Katz v US 1967
Engel v Vitale 1962
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
49. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Engel v Vitale 1962
Schenck v US 1919
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
50. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests