SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Separate is not equal
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
2. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
United States v Lopez 1995
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gitlow v NY 1925
Oregon v Elstad 1985
3. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Roe v Wade 1973
Bush v Gore 2000
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Powell v Alabama 1932
4. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Clinton v New York 1998
5. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Oregon v Elstad 1985
6. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
7. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Engel v Vitale 1962
New York Times v US 1971
Powell v Alabama 1932
Clinton v New York 1998
8. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
South Dakota v Dole 1987
9. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
10. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
11. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Gregg v Georgia 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
12. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
New York Times v US 1971
13. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Buckley v Baleo 1976
14. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
15. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Powell v Alabama 1932
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
16. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
17. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Betts v Brady 1942
Gitlow v NY 1925
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Bush v Gore 2000
18. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Katz v US 1967
US v Nixon 1974
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
19. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Furman v Georgia 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
South Dakota v Dole 1987
20. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Near v Minnesota 1931
Marbury v Madison 1803
21. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Powell v Alabama 1932
Barron v Baltimore 1819
22. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gregg v Georgia 1976
23. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Schenck v US 1919
Furman v Georgia 1972
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
24. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
25. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Virginia v Black 2002
26. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Dennis v US 1951
27. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Clinton v New York 1998
Dennis v US 1951
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
28. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Texas v Johnson 1989
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Bush v Gore 2000
Barron v Baltimore 1819
29. Separate but equal for races
Near v Minnesota 1931
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Miller v California 1973
30. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
31. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Fletcher v Peck 1810
New York Times v US 1971
Korematsu v US 1944
32. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Bush v Gore 2000
33. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Clinton v New York 1998
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
South Dakota v Dole 1987
34. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Bush v Gore 2000
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US v Nixon 1974
35. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Texas v Johnson 1989
US v Eichman 1990
United States v Lopez 1995
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
36. Right to privacy
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
37. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Powell v Alabama 1932
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
38. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Katz v US 1967
Near v Minnesota 1931
39. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
40. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Kelo v New London 2005
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Baker v Carr 1962
41. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Powell v Alabama 1932
42. You can burn the flag
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Baker v Carr 1962
Texas v Johnson 1989
43. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Korematsu v US 1944
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Kelo v New London 2005
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
44. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Roe v Wade 1973
Baker v Carr 1962
45. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
US v Eichman 1990
Texas v Johnson 1989
46. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
47. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Near v Minnesota 1931
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
48. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
Buckley v Baleo 1976
49. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
US v Eichman 1990
50. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Marbury v Madison 1803
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Roe v Wade 1973
Barron v Baltimore 1819