SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Korematsu v US 1944
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
2. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Bush v Gore 2000
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
3. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Engel v Vitale 1962
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
4. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Marbury v Madison 1803
Bush v Gore 2000
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
5. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
New York Times v US 1971
6. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Olmstead v US 1928
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
7. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Schenck v US 1919
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
8. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
United States v Lopez 1995
9. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
10. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Texas v Johnson 1989
Marbury v Madison 1803
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
11. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Texas v Johnson 1989
12. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Buckley v Baleo 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
13. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
14. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Miller v California 1973
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Kelo v New London 2005
15. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Near v Minnesota 1931
US v Eichman 1990
Baker v Carr 1962
16. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Korematsu v US 1944
New York Times v US 1971
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
17. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Miller v California 1973
Virginia v Black 2002
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Korematsu v US 1944
18. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Baker v Carr 1962
Powell v Alabama 1932
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
19. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Kelo v New London 2005
20. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
New York Times v US 1971
Dennis v US 1951
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
21. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Smith v Allwright 1944
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
22. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Dennis v US 1951
23. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Kelo v New London 2005
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Schenck v US 1919
24. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Gregg v Georgia 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Katz v US 1967
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
25. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Engel v Vitale 1962
26. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
27. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Roe v Wade 1973
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
28. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Katz v US 1967
Gitlow v NY 1925
Schenck v US 1919
29. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
30. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Katz v US 1967
US v Nixon 1974
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Furman v Georgia 1972
31. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Schenck v US 1919
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
32. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Betts v Brady 1942
New York Times v US 1971
Kelo v New London 2005
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
33. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
US v Eichman 1990
34. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Texas v Johnson 1989
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Smith v Allwright 1944
35. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Dennis v US 1951
Korematsu v US 1944
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
36. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
United States v Lopez 1995
Clinton v New York 1998
Miller v California 1973
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
37. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
New York Times v US 1971
Roe v Wade 1973
Kelo v New London 2005
38. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Schenck v US 1919
Betts v Brady 1942
Olmstead v US 1928
39. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
United States v Lopez 1995
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Clinton v New York 1998
40. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
US v Eichman 1990
Weeks v US 1914
Texas v Johnson 1989
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
41. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
42. Established judicial review
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Marbury v Madison 1803
Texas v Johnson 1989
Oregon v Elstad 1985
43. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Powell v Alabama 1932
Korematsu v US 1944
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
44. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
45. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
New York Times v US 1971
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Schenck v US 1919
46. Established exclusionary rule
Bush v Gore 2000
Weeks v US 1914
US v Nixon 1974
Baker v Carr 1962
47. You can burn the flag
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Kelo v New London 2005
48. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Furman v Georgia 1972
Miller v California 1973
Bush v Gore 2000
49. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Clinton v New York 1998
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
50. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Dennis v US 1951
Schenck v US 1919
Betts v Brady 1942
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests