SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Engel v Vitale 1962
Dennis v US 1951
2. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
3. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
US v Eichman 1990
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Miller v California 1973
Texas v Johnson 1989
4. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Betts v Brady 1942
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Baker v Carr 1962
5. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Engel v Vitale 1962
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Baker v Carr 1962
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
6. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Schenck v US 1919
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
7. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Miller v California 1973
South Dakota v Dole 1987
8. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
9. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Baker v Carr 1962
Miller v California 1973
10. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
11. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lawrence v Texas 2003
12. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
13. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bush v Gore 2000
Gregg v Georgia 1976
14. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
US v Nixon 1974
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Schenck v US 1919
15. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Virginia v Black 2002
New York Times v US 1971
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
16. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Bush v Gore 2000
Fletcher v Peck 1810
17. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Marbury v Madison 1803
Kelo v New London 2005
18. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Korematsu v US 1944
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
19. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Texas v Johnson 1989
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Buckley v Baleo 1976
20. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Schenck v US 1919
Dennis v US 1951
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Mapp v Ohio 1961
21. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Baker v Carr 1962
22. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
23. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Marbury v Madison 1803
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Betts v Brady 1942
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
24. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
25. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Clinton v New York 1998
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
26. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Bush v Gore 2000
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
27. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Gregg v Georgia 1976
28. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
29. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
30. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Bush v Gore 2000
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
31. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
Betts v Brady 1942
32. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Katz v US 1967
Near v Minnesota 1931
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
33. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
United States v Lopez 1995
Betts v Brady 1942
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
34. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
35. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Weeks v US 1914
Furman v Georgia 1972
Schenck v US 1919
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
36. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Marbury v Madison 1803
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
37. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Weeks v US 1914
Clinton v New York 1998
Kelo v New London 2005
Smith v Allwright 1944
38. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
New York Times v US 1971
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
39. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
40. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
United States v Lopez 1995
Dennis v US 1951
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
41. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Mapp v Ohio 1961
42. Separate but equal for races
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Buckley v Baleo 1976
43. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
44. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
45. Established judicial review
Katz v US 1967
Marbury v Madison 1803
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
46. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
47. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Baker v Carr 1962
Korematsu v US 1944
48. Separate is not equal
Dennis v US 1951
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Texas v Johnson 1989
49. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
50. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Clinton v New York 1998
Furman v Georgia 1972
Kelo v New London 2005