SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Weeks v US 1914
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
2. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Roe v Wade 1973
3. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Weeks v US 1914
4. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
5. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Olmstead v US 1928
New York Times v US 1971
Virginia v Black 2002
Kelo v New London 2005
6. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Marbury v Madison 1803
7. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
8. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Roe v Wade 1973
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Katz v US 1967
9. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Buckley v Baleo 1976
10. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Betts v Brady 1942
US v Eichman 1990
11. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
12. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
13. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Korematsu v US 1944
Clinton v New York 1998
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
14. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Buckley v Baleo 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
15. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Texas v Johnson 1989
Virginia v Black 2002
Engel v Vitale 1962
16. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
Katz v US 1967
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
17. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gitlow v NY 1925
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
18. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Roe v Wade 1973
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Baker v Carr 1962
19. Separate is not equal
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Bush v Gore 2000
US v Nixon 1974
20. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Smith v Allwright 1944
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Miranda v Arizona 1966
21. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Weeks v US 1914
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
22. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
New York Times v US 1971
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
23. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
US v Nixon 1974
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Kelo v New London 2005
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
24. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
25. You can burn the flag
Powell v Alabama 1932
Texas v Johnson 1989
Bush v Gore 2000
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
26. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Olmstead v US 1928
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
27. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US v Nixon 1974
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
28. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Virginia v Black 2002
29. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Furman v Georgia 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Near v Minnesota 1931
30. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
31. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
32. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Schenck v US 1919
Virginia v Black 2002
33. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
34. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Engel v Vitale 1962
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Fletcher v Peck 1810
35. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Kelo v New London 2005
Weeks v US 1914
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
36. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
United States v Lopez 1995
Miller v California 1973
37. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Near v Minnesota 1931
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Olmstead v US 1928
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
38. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Betts v Brady 1942
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
39. Right to privacy
Schenck v US 1919
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Miranda v Arizona 1966
40. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Korematsu v US 1944
Kelo v New London 2005
41. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Katz v US 1967
Lawrence v Texas 2003
New York Times v US 1971
42. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
43. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US v Nixon 1974
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Miranda v Arizona 1966
44. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Schenck v US 1919
Virginia v Black 2002
45. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Marbury v Madison 1803
Texas v Johnson 1989
Olmstead v US 1928
46. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
47. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
Miranda v Arizona 1966
48. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Kelo v New London 2005
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
49. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Bush v Gore 2000
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Furman v Georgia 1972
50. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Engel v Vitale 1962
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Near v Minnesota 1931