SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US v Eichman 1990
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Baker v Carr 1962
2. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Engel v Vitale 1962
3. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Gitlow v NY 1925
4. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Engel v Vitale 1962
Virginia v Black 2002
Kelo v New London 2005
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
5. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US v Nixon 1974
Weeks v US 1914
6. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Smith v Allwright 1944
US v Eichman 1990
7. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Baker v Carr 1962
Powell v Alabama 1932
Furman v Georgia 1972
8. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Furman v Georgia 1972
9. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
10. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
11. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Marbury v Madison 1803
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Schenck v US 1919
12. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Buckley v Baleo 1976
13. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Korematsu v US 1944
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
14. Separate is not equal
US v Eichman 1990
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Barron v Baltimore 1819
15. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
16. Established judicial review
Texas v Johnson 1989
Marbury v Madison 1803
US v Eichman 1990
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
17. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Smith v Allwright 1944
New York Times v US 1971
18. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Katz v US 1967
19. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Eichman 1990
Olmstead v US 1928
20. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Bush v Gore 2000
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
21. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
US v Eichman 1990
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Bush v Gore 2000
Betts v Brady 1942
22. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
23. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
US v Nixon 1974
24. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
United States v Lopez 1995
Powell v Alabama 1932
25. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Dennis v US 1951
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Furman v Georgia 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
26. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
New York Times v US 1971
Bush v Gore 2000
27. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Korematsu v US 1944
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
28. Separate but equal for races
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Virginia v Black 2002
29. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Olmstead v US 1928
Dennis v US 1951
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
30. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Lawrence v Texas 2003
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
31. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
32. You can burn the flag
Korematsu v US 1944
Texas v Johnson 1989
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
33. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Marbury v Madison 1803
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
34. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
35. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US v Eichman 1990
Oregon v Elstad 1985
36. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
37. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
38. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Engel v Vitale 1962
39. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Miller v California 1973
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
40. Established exclusionary rule
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Weeks v US 1914
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
41. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Betts v Brady 1942
United States v Lopez 1995
Katz v US 1967
Engel v Vitale 1962
42. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Schenck v US 1919
Texas v Johnson 1989
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dennis v US 1951
43. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Engel v Vitale 1962
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
44. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
45. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
South Dakota v Dole 1987
46. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
New York Times v US 1971
Near v Minnesota 1931
Engel v Vitale 1962
47. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Weeks v US 1914
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
48. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Weeks v US 1914
Miller v California 1973
Kelo v New London 2005
Engel v Vitale 1962
49. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Furman v Georgia 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
50. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
United States v Lopez 1995
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Griswold v Connecticut 1965