SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
2. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Bush v Gore 2000
3. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
4. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
5. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
6. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Katz v US 1967
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
7. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Schenck v US 1919
8. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
9. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Korematsu v US 1944
Miranda v Arizona 1966
10. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US v Eichman 1990
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
11. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
12. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Schenck v US 1919
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Furman v Georgia 1972
13. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Korematsu v US 1944
14. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
15. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
16. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Gitlow v NY 1925
Texas v Johnson 1989
17. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Engel v Vitale 1962
US v Nixon 1974
Dennis v US 1951
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
18. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
19. Established exclusionary rule
New York Times v US 1971
Korematsu v US 1944
Weeks v US 1914
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
20. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Powell v Alabama 1932
21. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Near v Minnesota 1931
22. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gregg v Georgia 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
23. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Baker v Carr 1962
24. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Marbury v Madison 1803
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
25. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
26. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
New York Times v US 1971
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Engel v Vitale 1962
27. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gregg v Georgia 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
28. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
29. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
US v Nixon 1974
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
30. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gitlow v NY 1925
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
31. Right to privacy
Furman v Georgia 1972
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
United States v Lopez 1995
32. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Kelo v New London 2005
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
33. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Engel v Vitale 1962
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Kelo v New London 2005
34. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
35. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Schenck v US 1919
Smith v Allwright 1944
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
36. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Fletcher v Peck 1810
37. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Schenck v US 1919
Powell v Alabama 1932
Dennis v US 1951
38. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Marbury v Madison 1803
Katz v US 1967
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
39. Separate but equal for races
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Olmstead v US 1928
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
40. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Baker v Carr 1962
Schenck v US 1919
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
41. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Roe v Wade 1973
42. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
43. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Marbury v Madison 1803
44. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Betts v Brady 1942
Buckley v Baleo 1976
45. You can burn the flag
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
US v Nixon 1974
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
46. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
47. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Virginia v Black 2002
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
48. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US v Nixon 1974
Mapp v Ohio 1961
49. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Engel v Vitale 1962
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Virginia v Black 2002
50. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Buckley v Baleo 1976