SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Clinton v New York 1998
Buckley v Baleo 1976
New York Times v US 1971
2. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Barron v Baltimore 1819
3. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Betts v Brady 1942
4. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Olmstead v US 1928
US v Nixon 1974
Betts v Brady 1942
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
5. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Bush v Gore 2000
United States v Lopez 1995
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
6. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
7. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
US v Nixon 1974
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
8. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Miller v California 1973
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
9. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Marbury v Madison 1803
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
10. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
South Dakota v Dole 1987
11. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
12. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Furman v Georgia 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
13. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Roe v Wade 1973
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
14. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Powell v Alabama 1932
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Engel v Vitale 1962
15. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Furman v Georgia 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
16. You can burn the flag
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
17. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
18. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Nixon 1974
19. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Miller v California 1973
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
20. Separate is not equal
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
21. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Engel v Vitale 1962
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
22. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US v Nixon 1974
US v Eichman 1990
Roe v Wade 1973
23. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Texas v Johnson 1989
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
24. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Miller v California 1973
25. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
26. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Powell v Alabama 1932
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
27. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Furman v Georgia 1972
Katz v US 1967
28. Established exclusionary rule
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Weeks v US 1914
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Schenck v US 1919
29. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Texas v Johnson 1989
30. Established judicial review
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
31. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
32. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
33. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Gitlow v NY 1925
Furman v Georgia 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
34. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Katz v US 1967
Clinton v New York 1998
35. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
36. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
US v Eichman 1990
United States v Lopez 1995
Betts v Brady 1942
Weeks v US 1914
37. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Powell v Alabama 1932
Lawrence v Texas 2003
38. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
39. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US v Nixon 1974
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
40. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Miller v California 1973
Dennis v US 1951
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Barron v Baltimore 1819
41. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Engel v Vitale 1962
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
42. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Bush v Gore 2000
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gitlow v NY 1925
Texas v Johnson 1989
43. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
44. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
45. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Schenck v US 1919
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gitlow v NY 1925
Oregon v Elstad 1985
46. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
47. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Kelo v New London 2005
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
48. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Powell v Alabama 1932
49. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
US v Eichman 1990
New York Times v US 1971
Clinton v New York 1998
50. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000