SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Furman v Georgia 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
2. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
United States v Lopez 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
3. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Near v Minnesota 1931
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
4. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Smith v Allwright 1944
5. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Katz v US 1967
Clinton v New York 1998
6. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
New York Times v US 1971
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
7. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Smith v Allwright 1944
8. Established exclusionary rule
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Weeks v US 1914
US v Nixon 1974
9. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Fletcher v Peck 1810
10. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Smith v Allwright 1944
11. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Texas v Johnson 1989
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Katz v US 1967
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
12. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miller v California 1973
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
13. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Smith v Allwright 1944
14. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Mapp v Ohio 1961
15. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
16. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Texas v Johnson 1989
17. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Gitlow v NY 1925
Roe v Wade 1973
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
18. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Furman v Georgia 1972
19. Separate is not equal
Powell v Alabama 1932
Schenck v US 1919
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
20. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Clinton v New York 1998
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
21. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
22. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Betts v Brady 1942
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
23. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Barron v Baltimore 1819
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Bush v Gore 2000
Roe v Wade 1973
24. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Virginia v Black 2002
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
25. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Katz v US 1967
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Gitlow v NY 1925
26. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Schenck v US 1919
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Miller v California 1973
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
27. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Clinton v New York 1998
Bush v Gore 2000
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
US v Nixon 1974
28. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Weeks v US 1914
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Powell v Alabama 1932
29. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
30. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
United States v Lopez 1995
Miller v California 1973
Smith v Allwright 1944
31. Separate but equal for races
US v Nixon 1974
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Dennis v US 1951
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
32. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Katz v US 1967
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
33. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
34. You can burn the flag
Powell v Alabama 1932
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Texas v Johnson 1989
United States v Lopez 1995
35. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Olmstead v US 1928
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
36. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
US v Eichman 1990
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Oregon v Elstad 1985
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
37. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
New York Times v US 1971
38. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
39. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Virginia v Black 2002
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
40. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Betts v Brady 1942
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
41. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Bush v Gore 2000
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Furman v Georgia 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
42. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Katz v US 1967
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
South Dakota v Dole 1987
43. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Kelo v New London 2005
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
44. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Powell v Alabama 1932
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
45. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Miller v California 1973
Clinton v New York 1998
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
46. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Bush v Gore 2000
47. Established judicial review
US v Nixon 1974
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Marbury v Madison 1803
Bush v Gore 2000
48. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
Kelo v New London 2005
Virginia v Black 2002
49. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Kelo v New London 2005
US v Eichman 1990
US v Nixon 1974
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
50. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Powell v Alabama 1932
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Barron v Baltimore 1819