SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Texas v Johnson 1989
2. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Miranda v Arizona 1966
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Smith v Allwright 1944
3. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Korematsu v US 1944
Weeks v US 1914
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
4. Established exclusionary rule
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Weeks v US 1914
5. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Near v Minnesota 1931
Katz v US 1967
6. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Texas v Johnson 1989
7. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Kelo v New London 2005
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Bush v Gore 2000
Miller v California 1973
8. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gitlow v NY 1925
Virginia v Black 2002
9. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Mapp v Ohio 1961
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Miranda v Arizona 1966
10. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
11. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Katz v US 1967
Furman v Georgia 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
12. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Mapp v Ohio 1961
US v Eichman 1990
New York Times v US 1971
Baker v Carr 1962
13. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
14. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Katz v US 1967
Texas v Johnson 1989
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
15. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
16. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Korematsu v US 1944
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
17. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
18. Separate is not equal
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Engel v Vitale 1962
Baker v Carr 1962
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
19. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Baker v Carr 1962
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Katz v US 1967
20. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Korematsu v US 1944
Texas v Johnson 1989
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Oregon v Elstad 1985
21. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Smith v Allwright 1944
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
22. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Powell v Alabama 1932
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
23. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
US v Nixon 1974
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Texas v Johnson 1989
24. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
US v Nixon 1974
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
25. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Dennis v US 1951
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
26. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Schenck v US 1919
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
27. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
New York Times v US 1971
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
28. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Clinton v New York 1998
29. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Roe v Wade 1973
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
30. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Clinton v New York 1998
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
31. Established judicial review
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Korematsu v US 1944
Marbury v Madison 1803
Betts v Brady 1942
32. You can burn the flag
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Texas v Johnson 1989
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
33. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
34. Separate but equal for races
Miller v California 1973
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
35. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
36. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
37. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Marbury v Madison 1803
Kelo v New London 2005
Fletcher v Peck 1810
38. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
39. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
40. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Engel v Vitale 1962
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
41. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Buckley v Baleo 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
42. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
43. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Barron v Baltimore 1819
44. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Smith v Allwright 1944
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
45. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Korematsu v US 1944
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
46. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US v Nixon 1974
New York Times v US 1971
Gregg v Georgia 1976
47. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Clinton v New York 1998
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
48. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Weeks v US 1914
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
49. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
50. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Buckley v Baleo 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Baker v Carr 1962
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests