SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Dennis v US 1951
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
2. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
3. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Miller v California 1973
Weeks v US 1914
Korematsu v US 1944
Marbury v Madison 1803
4. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Powell v Alabama 1932
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
5. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
6. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
7. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Nixon 1974
Miller v California 1973
8. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Weeks v US 1914
9. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Gitlow v NY 1925
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Korematsu v US 1944
Bush v Gore 2000
10. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Texas v Johnson 1989
11. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Schenck v US 1919
Near v Minnesota 1931
12. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Marbury v Madison 1803
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Katz v US 1967
13. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
US v Eichman 1990
Korematsu v US 1944
Gitlow v NY 1925
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
14. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
US v Nixon 1974
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
15. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Olmstead v US 1928
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
16. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Olmstead v US 1928
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
17. Established judicial review
US v Eichman 1990
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Marbury v Madison 1803
18. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Virginia v Black 2002
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
19. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
20. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Katz v US 1967
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
21. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
US v Nixon 1974
Katz v US 1967
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
22. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
23. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Baker v Carr 1962
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
24. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Betts v Brady 1942
Kelo v New London 2005
Furman v Georgia 1972
25. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Lawrence v Texas 2003
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
26. Separate but equal for races
Smith v Allwright 1944
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
27. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Bush v Gore 2000
Kelo v New London 2005
Virginia v Black 2002
Korematsu v US 1944
28. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Korematsu v US 1944
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
US v Nixon 1974
29. Right to privacy
Engel v Vitale 1962
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Smith v Allwright 1944
Weeks v US 1914
30. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Engel v Vitale 1962
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
31. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Furman v Georgia 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
32. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Smith v Allwright 1944
New York Times v US 1971
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
33. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Gregg v Georgia 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Smith v Allwright 1944
34. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Clinton v New York 1998
Dennis v US 1951
Kelo v New London 2005
35. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Gitlow v NY 1925
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
36. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Smith v Allwright 1944
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
37. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Dennis v US 1951
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
38. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
US v Nixon 1974
United States v Lopez 1995
39. You can burn the flag
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Olmstead v US 1928
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
40. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Powell v Alabama 1932
41. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Baker v Carr 1962
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
42. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Kelo v New London 2005
Miller v California 1973
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Dennis v US 1951
43. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
US v Nixon 1974
Near v Minnesota 1931
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
44. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
45. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Baker v Carr 1962
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
South Dakota v Dole 1987
46. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US v Nixon 1974
Betts v Brady 1942
Virginia v Black 2002
47. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Betts v Brady 1942
United States v Lopez 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
48. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Dennis v US 1951
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
49. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Schenck v US 1919
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
50. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
US v Eichman 1990
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964