SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Smith v Allwright 1944
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Engel v Vitale 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
2. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Olmstead v US 1928
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Miranda v Arizona 1966
3. Established exclusionary rule
Korematsu v US 1944
Weeks v US 1914
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
New York Times v US 1971
4. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Schenck v US 1919
Kelo v New London 2005
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
5. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
United States v Lopez 1995
Clinton v New York 1998
Baker v Carr 1962
6. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
7. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Baker v Carr 1962
8. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
9. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Dennis v US 1951
Roe v Wade 1973
Miller v California 1973
10. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Virginia v Black 2002
Engel v Vitale 1962
Olmstead v US 1928
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
11. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
12. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Clinton v New York 1998
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
13. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Clinton v New York 1998
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Gitlow v NY 1925
14. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
US v Eichman 1990
Gitlow v NY 1925
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
15. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
16. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Betts v Brady 1942
Oregon v Elstad 1985
17. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Roe v Wade 1973
New York Times v US 1971
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
18. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
South Dakota v Dole 1987
19. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Dennis v US 1951
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Powell v Alabama 1932
20. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Bush v Gore 2000
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Kelo v New London 2005
21. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Powell v Alabama 1932
22. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Furman v Georgia 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katz v US 1967
23. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Virginia v Black 2002
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
24. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
25. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Betts v Brady 1942
Kelo v New London 2005
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
26. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
27. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Katz v US 1967
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
28. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Near v Minnesota 1931
29. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
New York Times v US 1971
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
United States v Lopez 1995
30. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
31. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Schenck v US 1919
Korematsu v US 1944
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
32. Separate but equal for races
Engel v Vitale 1962
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
33. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
United States v Lopez 1995
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
US v Nixon 1974
34. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Virginia v Black 2002
Schenck v US 1919
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
35. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Olmstead v US 1928
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
36. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
37. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Betts v Brady 1942
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
38. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
39. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US v Eichman 1990
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
40. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
41. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
42. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Olmstead v US 1928
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
43. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Powell v Alabama 1932
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
44. Established judicial review
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Kelo v New London 2005
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Marbury v Madison 1803
45. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
46. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Powell v Alabama 1932
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Katz v US 1967
47. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
48. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Baker v Carr 1962
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US v Eichman 1990
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
49. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Korematsu v US 1944
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
50. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Olmstead v US 1928
Furman v Georgia 1972
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Dennis v US 1951