SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Mapp v Ohio 1961
2. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Texas v Johnson 1989
3. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Roe v Wade 1973
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Katz v US 1967
US v Nixon 1974
4. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
New York Times v US 1971
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
5. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Baker v Carr 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
6. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
7. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gitlow v NY 1925
Katz v US 1967
Barron v Baltimore 1819
8. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Clinton v New York 1998
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
9. Established judicial review
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gregg v Georgia 1976
10. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Baker v Carr 1962
Korematsu v US 1944
Schenck v US 1919
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
11. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Smith v Allwright 1944
12. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Olmstead v US 1928
Dennis v US 1951
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Furman v Georgia 1972
13. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Kelo v New London 2005
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
14. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Olmstead v US 1928
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Smith v Allwright 1944
15. Separate but equal for races
Schenck v US 1919
Texas v Johnson 1989
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
16. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Furman v Georgia 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Roe v Wade 1973
Virginia v Black 2002
17. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Olmstead v US 1928
Engel v Vitale 1962
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
18. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Korematsu v US 1944
Olmstead v US 1928
19. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gregg v Georgia 1976
20. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Betts v Brady 1942
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
21. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Bush v Gore 2000
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Powell v Alabama 1932
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
22. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Baker v Carr 1962
23. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Olmstead v US 1928
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
24. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Texas v Johnson 1989
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Dennis v US 1951
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
25. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Schenck v US 1919
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
26. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Weeks v US 1914
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
27. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Betts v Brady 1942
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
28. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Furman v Georgia 1972
29. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Roe v Wade 1973
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Weeks v US 1914
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
30. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
Dennis v US 1951
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
31. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
32. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Virginia v Black 2002
Katz v US 1967
Kelo v New London 2005
Clinton v New York 1998
33. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Bush v Gore 2000
Miller v California 1973
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US v Eichman 1990
34. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Mapp v Ohio 1961
35. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Miller v California 1973
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
36. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Baker v Carr 1962
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Katz v US 1967
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
37. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
38. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Olmstead v US 1928
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bush v Gore 2000
39. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Bush v Gore 2000
Smith v Allwright 1944
40. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Buckley v Baleo 1976
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Schenck v US 1919
41. Right to privacy
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Betts v Brady 1942
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
New York Times v US 1971
42. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Buckley v Baleo 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Olmstead v US 1928
43. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
United States v Lopez 1995
Olmstead v US 1928
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Roe v Wade 1973
44. Separate is not equal
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Smith v Allwright 1944
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
45. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
New York Times v US 1971
United States v Lopez 1995
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Smith v Allwright 1944
46. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Schenck v US 1919
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
47. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Katz v US 1967
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
48. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Roe v Wade 1973
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
49. You can burn the flag
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Betts v Brady 1942
Texas v Johnson 1989
Fletcher v Peck 1810
50. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Dennis v US 1951
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Epperson v Arkansas 1968