SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Korematsu v US 1944
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
2. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
3. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
4. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
5. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Roe v Wade 1973
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
6. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Powell v Alabama 1932
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
7. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
8. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Powell v Alabama 1932
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
9. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Olmstead v US 1928
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
10. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
Gregg v Georgia 1976
11. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Powell v Alabama 1932
Schenck v US 1919
Gitlow v NY 1925
Roe v Wade 1973
12. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Marbury v Madison 1803
Baker v Carr 1962
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
13. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Roe v Wade 1973
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
14. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Virginia v Black 2002
Korematsu v US 1944
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
15. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
US v Nixon 1974
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
16. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Roe v Wade 1973
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
17. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Kelo v New London 2005
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
18. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Virginia v Black 2002
Schenck v US 1919
19. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Clinton v New York 1998
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
US v Eichman 1990
Kelo v New London 2005
20. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Baker v Carr 1962
21. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Fletcher v Peck 1810
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
United States v Lopez 1995
22. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Roe v Wade 1973
US v Eichman 1990
23. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Roe v Wade 1973
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Smith v Allwright 1944
24. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
25. Separate is not equal
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
US v Nixon 1974
Bush v Gore 2000
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
26. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
US v Eichman 1990
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
27. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Marbury v Madison 1803
United States v Lopez 1995
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
28. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
United States v Lopez 1995
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Miranda v Arizona 1966
29. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Engel v Vitale 1962
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Roe v Wade 1973
30. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Bush v Gore 2000
Near v Minnesota 1931
Virginia v Black 2002
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
31. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
32. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Betts v Brady 1942
Near v Minnesota 1931
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
33. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
South Dakota v Dole 1987
New York Times v US 1971
34. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Katz v US 1967
Roe v Wade 1973
US v Nixon 1974
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
35. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Bush v Gore 2000
Smith v Allwright 1944
36. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
US v Eichman 1990
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
37. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Betts v Brady 1942
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
38. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Kelo v New London 2005
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Betts v Brady 1942
39. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Engel v Vitale 1962
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
40. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
Weeks v US 1914
41. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Gitlow v NY 1925
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
South Dakota v Dole 1987
42. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Miller v California 1973
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
43. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Betts v Brady 1942
Bush v Gore 2000
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
44. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Lawrence v Texas 2003
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Katz v US 1967
45. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
US v Eichman 1990
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
46. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Korematsu v US 1944
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
47. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
48. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
49. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Texas v Johnson 1989
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
50. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Korematsu v US 1944
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942