SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
2. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Clinton v New York 1998
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
3. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Buckley v Baleo 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
4. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Schenck v US 1919
Gregg v Georgia 1976
5. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Betts v Brady 1942
Engel v Vitale 1962
New York Times v US 1971
6. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Engel v Vitale 1962
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
7. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Katz v US 1967
8. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Baker v Carr 1962
Olmstead v US 1928
9. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
10. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Lawrence v Texas 2003
11. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Clinton v New York 1998
Korematsu v US 1944
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
12. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
13. Established exclusionary rule
Olmstead v US 1928
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Weeks v US 1914
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
14. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Furman v Georgia 1972
Katz v US 1967
15. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Schenck v US 1919
Near v Minnesota 1931
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Miranda v Arizona 1966
16. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Virginia v Black 2002
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
17. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
18. Separate is not equal
Furman v Georgia 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
19. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Korematsu v US 1944
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Kelo v New London 2005
United States v Lopez 1995
20. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Katz v US 1967
Korematsu v US 1944
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
21. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
US v Nixon 1974
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Barron v Baltimore 1819
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
22. Established judicial review
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Marbury v Madison 1803
Miller v California 1973
23. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Roe v Wade 1973
US v Nixon 1974
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
24. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Smith v Allwright 1944
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
25. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Clinton v New York 1998
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
26. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Smith v Allwright 1944
Miller v California 1973
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
27. You can burn the flag
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Furman v Georgia 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Texas v Johnson 1989
28. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
US v Nixon 1974
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Miller v California 1973
29. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Powell v Alabama 1932
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
30. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Miller v California 1973
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
31. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
32. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gitlow v NY 1925
33. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
34. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Olmstead v US 1928
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
35. Separate but equal for races
Virginia v Black 2002
Engel v Vitale 1962
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Baker v Carr 1962
36. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Korematsu v US 1944
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
37. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
Korematsu v US 1944
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
38. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Betts v Brady 1942
Olmstead v US 1928
39. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
US v Eichman 1990
Katz v US 1967
Clinton v New York 1998
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
40. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
41. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Olmstead v US 1928
Furman v Georgia 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gitlow v NY 1925
42. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Mapp v Ohio 1961
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
43. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US v Nixon 1974
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
44. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Bush v Gore 2000
Clinton v New York 1998
45. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
New York Times v US 1971
Smith v Allwright 1944
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
46. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
US v Nixon 1974
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
47. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
48. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Powell v Alabama 1932
Lawrence v Texas 2003
49. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
US v Nixon 1974
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Powell v Alabama 1932
50. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Miller v California 1973
Weeks v US 1914
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Korematsu v US 1944