SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
US v Nixon 1974
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Baker v Carr 1962
2. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Schenck v US 1919
3. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Betts v Brady 1942
Olmstead v US 1928
4. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Kelo v New London 2005
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
5. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Katz v US 1967
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Roe v Wade 1973
6. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
7. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Texas v Johnson 1989
8. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Bush v Gore 2000
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
9. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Clinton v New York 1998
Powell v Alabama 1932
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gitlow v NY 1925
10. Right to privacy
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
11. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
12. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Dennis v US 1951
Gitlow v NY 1925
Near v Minnesota 1931
Oregon v Elstad 1985
13. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
14. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
15. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
Betts v Brady 1942
16. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Katz v US 1967
17. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Katz v US 1967
Smith v Allwright 1944
18. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
19. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Roe v Wade 1973
Clinton v New York 1998
20. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Nixon 1974
21. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Baker v Carr 1962
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
22. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
United States v Lopez 1995
23. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
24. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Betts v Brady 1942
Schenck v US 1919
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
25. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
US v Eichman 1990
Katz v US 1967
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
26. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Korematsu v US 1944
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
27. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Clinton v New York 1998
US v Nixon 1974
28. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
29. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Engel v Vitale 1962
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
30. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katz v US 1967
Buckley v Baleo 1976
31. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
New York Times v US 1971
Gitlow v NY 1925
Baker v Carr 1962
Mapp v Ohio 1961
32. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Furman v Georgia 1972
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Smith v Allwright 1944
Barron v Baltimore 1819
33. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
South Dakota v Dole 1987
34. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Powell v Alabama 1932
Miller v California 1973
Miranda v Arizona 1966
35. You can burn the flag
Miller v California 1973
Dennis v US 1951
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
36. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
37. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Clinton v New York 1998
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Roe v Wade 1973
38. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Virginia v Black 2002
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
39. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
40. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
New York Times v US 1971
Korematsu v US 1944
Furman v Georgia 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
41. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
42. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Virginia v Black 2002
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
Texas v Johnson 1989
43. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
US v Eichman 1990
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Mapp v Ohio 1961
44. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Near v Minnesota 1931
45. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Marbury v Madison 1803
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
46. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Weeks v US 1914
47. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Miller v California 1973
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
48. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Olmstead v US 1928
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
49. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
50. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Smith v Allwright 1944
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests