SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Separate but equal for races
Dennis v US 1951
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
2. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US v Eichman 1990
Dennis v US 1951
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
3. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Engel v Vitale 1962
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Betts v Brady 1942
4. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
5. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
United States v Lopez 1995
Korematsu v US 1944
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
6. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Korematsu v US 1944
7. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
New York Times v US 1971
Smith v Allwright 1944
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
8. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Lawrence v Texas 2003
United States v Lopez 1995
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Miller v California 1973
9. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Baker v Carr 1962
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Barron v Baltimore 1819
10. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Korematsu v US 1944
Clinton v New York 1998
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
11. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
US v Nixon 1974
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
12. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
13. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Buckley v Baleo 1976
14. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Dennis v US 1951
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
15. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Miller v California 1973
16. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Betts v Brady 1942
17. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
18. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Virginia v Black 2002
Clinton v New York 1998
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
19. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Miranda v Arizona 1966
20. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bush v Gore 2000
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
21. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Schenck v US 1919
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
22. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
23. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gitlow v NY 1925
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
24. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Roe v Wade 1973
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
25. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US v Eichman 1990
Marbury v Madison 1803
26. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Bush v Gore 2000
27. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
28. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Dennis v US 1951
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US v Eichman 1990
29. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US v Eichman 1990
Katz v US 1967
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
30. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
31. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Olmstead v US 1928
Kelo v New London 2005
Oregon v Elstad 1985
32. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Kelo v New London 2005
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
33. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
34. Established exclusionary rule
Baker v Carr 1962
Weeks v US 1914
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
35. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Schenck v US 1919
Near v Minnesota 1931
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
36. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
US v Nixon 1974
Baker v Carr 1962
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
37. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
38. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Weeks v US 1914
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
US v Eichman 1990
Clinton v New York 1998
39. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
40. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Miller v California 1973
41. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
Schenck v US 1919
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
42. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Olmstead v US 1928
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Smith v Allwright 1944
43. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
44. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Furman v Georgia 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
45. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Weeks v US 1914
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
46. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
47. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Smith v Allwright 1944
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
48. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
49. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
50. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests