SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
Miller v California 1973
Mapp v Ohio 1961
2. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
US v Nixon 1974
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Powell v Alabama 1932
3. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Gregg v Georgia 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
4. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Korematsu v US 1944
Katz v US 1967
Gitlow v NY 1925
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
5. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Clinton v New York 1998
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
6. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Barron v Baltimore 1819
7. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
New York Times v US 1971
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Korematsu v US 1944
8. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miller v California 1973
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
9. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
US v Nixon 1974
10. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Dennis v US 1951
Furman v Georgia 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Miller v California 1973
11. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
12. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Weeks v US 1914
Dennis v US 1951
13. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Kelo v New London 2005
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Gregg v Georgia 1976
14. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Betts v Brady 1942
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
15. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Near v Minnesota 1931
Betts v Brady 1942
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
16. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Furman v Georgia 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
17. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Fletcher v Peck 1810
US v Nixon 1974
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
18. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Nixon 1974
Baker v Carr 1962
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
19. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Olmstead v US 1928
20. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
United States v Lopez 1995
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Engel v Vitale 1962
21. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
22. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Dennis v US 1951
South Dakota v Dole 1987
United States v Lopez 1995
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
23. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
24. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Barron v Baltimore 1819
United States v Lopez 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
25. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Kelo v New London 2005
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
US v Nixon 1974
26. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
27. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
Mapp v Ohio 1961
28. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Korematsu v US 1944
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
29. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Roe v Wade 1973
Betts v Brady 1942
US v Eichman 1990
30. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
31. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
32. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Betts v Brady 1942
33. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
34. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
US v Nixon 1974
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Lawrence v Texas 2003
35. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
36. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
37. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Barron v Baltimore 1819
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US v Eichman 1990
38. Separate but equal for races
Gitlow v NY 1925
Korematsu v US 1944
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
39. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Weeks v US 1914
Korematsu v US 1944
Schenck v US 1919
40. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
41. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Virginia v Black 2002
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
42. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
US v Nixon 1974
Engel v Vitale 1962
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
43. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dennis v US 1951
Weeks v US 1914
44. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
New York Times v US 1971
45. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Gitlow v NY 1925
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
46. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
47. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Gitlow v NY 1925
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
48. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
49. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
Dennis v US 1951
US v Eichman 1990
50. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Smith v Allwright 1944
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Griswold v Connecticut 1965