SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Mapp v Ohio 1961
2. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Kelo v New London 2005
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Baker v Carr 1962
3. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Powell v Alabama 1932
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Schenck v US 1919
4. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Weeks v US 1914
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
5. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
6. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Powell v Alabama 1932
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Olmstead v US 1928
7. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
8. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Roe v Wade 1973
9. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
10. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Betts v Brady 1942
Furman v Georgia 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Katz v US 1967
11. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
12. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Near v Minnesota 1931
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Fletcher v Peck 1810
13. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
14. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Katz v US 1967
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
15. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Engel v Vitale 1962
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
16. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Betts v Brady 1942
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Marbury v Madison 1803
Dennis v US 1951
17. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katz v US 1967
18. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Kelo v New London 2005
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gitlow v NY 1925
19. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
20. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Katz v US 1967
Miller v California 1973
21. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Clinton v New York 1998
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Weeks v US 1914
22. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
Barron v Baltimore 1819
23. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Katz v US 1967
Dennis v US 1951
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
24. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Powell v Alabama 1932
Texas v Johnson 1989
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
25. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Furman v Georgia 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Roe v Wade 1973
Betts v Brady 1942
26. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Roe v Wade 1973
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
27. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Marbury v Madison 1803
Bush v Gore 2000
Baker v Carr 1962
New York Times v US 1971
28. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
29. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Korematsu v US 1944
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
30. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Miller v California 1973
Oregon v Elstad 1985
31. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
32. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
Korematsu v US 1944
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
33. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
34. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
35. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
36. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Smith v Allwright 1944
Virginia v Black 2002
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
37. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Furman v Georgia 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
Kelo v New London 2005
38. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Schenck v US 1919
Olmstead v US 1928
39. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Betts v Brady 1942
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
40. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
United States v Lopez 1995
Powell v Alabama 1932
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Fletcher v Peck 1810
41. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Clinton v New York 1998
Engel v Vitale 1962
Schenck v US 1919
Korematsu v US 1944
42. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Clinton v New York 1998
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
43. Established exclusionary rule
Furman v Georgia 1972
Weeks v US 1914
Miranda v Arizona 1966
United States v Lopez 1995
44. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Bush v Gore 2000
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
45. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
United States v Lopez 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
46. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
47. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Clinton v New York 1998
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Fletcher v Peck 1810
48. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Kelo v New London 2005
Virginia v Black 2002
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
49. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
50. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Kelo v New London 2005
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests