SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Virginia v Black 2002
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
2. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Texas v Johnson 1989
Engel v Vitale 1962
3. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
4. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Dennis v US 1951
5. Established judicial review
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Marbury v Madison 1803
New York Times v US 1971
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
6. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
7. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
8. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
New York Times v US 1971
Kelo v New London 2005
Miller v California 1973
9. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Gitlow v NY 1925
Furman v Georgia 1972
Smith v Allwright 1944
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
10. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Korematsu v US 1944
Powell v Alabama 1932
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
11. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
United States v Lopez 1995
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
12. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Baker v Carr 1962
13. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
14. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miranda v Arizona 1966
15. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Kelo v New London 2005
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
16. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Furman v Georgia 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
17. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
New York Times v US 1971
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Dennis v US 1951
US v Nixon 1974
18. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Engel v Vitale 1962
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
19. Right to privacy
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Baker v Carr 1962
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
20. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
21. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Gitlow v NY 1925
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
22. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Roe v Wade 1973
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Clinton v New York 1998
US v Eichman 1990
23. You can burn the flag
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Texas v Johnson 1989
24. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gitlow v NY 1925
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
25. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Baker v Carr 1962
Korematsu v US 1944
Barron v Baltimore 1819
26. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
27. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Korematsu v US 1944
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Baker v Carr 1962
28. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dennis v US 1951
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
29. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Roe v Wade 1973
Fletcher v Peck 1810
30. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Katz v US 1967
Bush v Gore 2000
US v Eichman 1990
31. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Betts v Brady 1942
Smith v Allwright 1944
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
32. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Smith v Allwright 1944
33. Separate is not equal
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Weeks v US 1914
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Schenck v US 1919
34. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Furman v Georgia 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
35. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Powell v Alabama 1932
Kelo v New London 2005
Engel v Vitale 1962
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
36. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Smith v Allwright 1944
Katz v US 1967
37. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Miller v California 1973
Betts v Brady 1942
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
38. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Baker v Carr 1962
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Roe v Wade 1973
39. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
40. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Betts v Brady 1942
Weeks v US 1914
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
41. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Dennis v US 1951
Schenck v US 1919
Olmstead v US 1928
Fletcher v Peck 1810
42. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Gitlow v NY 1925
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Mapp v Ohio 1961
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
43. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Buckley v Baleo 1976
44. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US v Nixon 1974
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Engel v Vitale 1962
45. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miller v California 1973
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
46. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Schenck v US 1919
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
47. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
48. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Near v Minnesota 1931
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Mapp v Ohio 1961
49. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Baker v Carr 1962
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
50. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992