SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US v Nixon 1974
2. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gitlow v NY 1925
3. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Korematsu v US 1944
Furman v Georgia 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
4. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Roe v Wade 1973
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Virginia v Black 2002
Smith v Allwright 1944
5. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Marbury v Madison 1803
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
6. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Miller v California 1973
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Korematsu v US 1944
7. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Near v Minnesota 1931
Kelo v New London 2005
8. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Schenck v US 1919
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Dennis v US 1951
9. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Buckley v Baleo 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
10. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Dennis v US 1951
Texas v Johnson 1989
Barron v Baltimore 1819
11. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Virginia v Black 2002
Korematsu v US 1944
New York Times v US 1971
12. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Lawrence v Texas 2003
13. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
14. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
15. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Weeks v US 1914
Miller v California 1973
Engel v Vitale 1962
Katz v US 1967
16. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Smith v Allwright 1944
Near v Minnesota 1931
17. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miller v California 1973
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
18. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gitlow v NY 1925
Miller v California 1973
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
19. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
20. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Near v Minnesota 1931
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
21. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
22. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
New York Times v US 1971
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
23. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Texas v Johnson 1989
24. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Baker v Carr 1962
Katz v US 1967
US v Eichman 1990
25. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Engel v Vitale 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
26. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Schenck v US 1919
New York Times v US 1971
US v Eichman 1990
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
27. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Virginia v Black 2002
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
28. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
United States v Lopez 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miller v California 1973
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
29. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
30. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
31. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Mapp v Ohio 1961
US v Eichman 1990
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
32. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
33. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
34. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Oregon v Elstad 1985
35. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
36. Separate is not equal
US v Nixon 1974
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
South Dakota v Dole 1987
37. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Schenck v US 1919
38. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Roe v Wade 1973
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Engel v Vitale 1962
39. Separate but equal for races
Weeks v US 1914
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Barron v Baltimore 1819
40. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
41. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Schenck v US 1919
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Betts v Brady 1942
42. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Schenck v US 1919
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
43. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Near v Minnesota 1931
Baker v Carr 1962
United States v Lopez 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
44. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Texas v Johnson 1989
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Clinton v New York 1998
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
45. Right to privacy
Miller v California 1973
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US v Nixon 1974
Smith v Allwright 1944
46. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Korematsu v US 1944
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Dennis v US 1951
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
47. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
48. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Virginia v Black 2002
49. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
50. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests