SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Clinton v New York 1998
2. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Engel v Vitale 1962
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gitlow v NY 1925
3. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Buckley v Baleo 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
4. Right to privacy
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Korematsu v US 1944
5. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
6. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gregg v Georgia 1976
7. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Smith v Allwright 1944
Near v Minnesota 1931
Buckley v Baleo 1976
8. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Near v Minnesota 1931
Furman v Georgia 1972
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
9. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Baker v Carr 1962
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
New York Times v US 1971
US v Nixon 1974
10. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
United States v Lopez 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
11. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Bush v Gore 2000
12. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Powell v Alabama 1932
Dennis v US 1951
13. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Weeks v US 1914
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
14. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
15. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Oregon v Elstad 1985
16. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Engel v Vitale 1962
17. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Kelo v New London 2005
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
18. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
19. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dennis v US 1951
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
20. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
21. You can burn the flag
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
Weeks v US 1914
United States v Lopez 1995
22. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Texas v Johnson 1989
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
23. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US v Nixon 1974
Furman v Georgia 1972
24. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
25. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Betts v Brady 1942
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Barron v Baltimore 1819
26. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
US v Nixon 1974
27. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
28. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Near v Minnesota 1931
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
29. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Roe v Wade 1973
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Baker v Carr 1962
Miller v California 1973
30. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Engel v Vitale 1962
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
31. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
United States v Lopez 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Texas v Johnson 1989
32. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Virginia v Black 2002
Korematsu v US 1944
33. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Powell v Alabama 1932
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
34. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Kelo v New London 2005
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Engel v Vitale 1962
Buckley v Baleo 1976
35. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US v Eichman 1990
Weeks v US 1914
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
36. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Betts v Brady 1942
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Miranda v Arizona 1966
37. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Katz v US 1967
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Kelo v New London 2005
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
38. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
39. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Betts v Brady 1942
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
40. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Olmstead v US 1928
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
41. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
42. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
United States v Lopez 1995
Smith v Allwright 1944
Dennis v US 1951
43. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Katz v US 1967
Olmstead v US 1928
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
44. Established judicial review
Baker v Carr 1962
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Miller v California 1973
Marbury v Madison 1803
45. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Olmstead v US 1928
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
United States v Lopez 1995
46. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Bush v Gore 2000
US v Nixon 1974
Smith v Allwright 1944
Roe v Wade 1973
47. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Furman v Georgia 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
48. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Korematsu v US 1944
Barron v Baltimore 1819
49. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Baker v Carr 1962
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
50. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Virginia v Black 2002