SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Gregg v Georgia 1976
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
New York Times v US 1971
2. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Kelo v New London 2005
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
3. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Dennis v US 1951
4. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
Texas v Johnson 1989
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
5. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
6. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Dennis v US 1951
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
US v Nixon 1974
7. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Weeks v US 1914
Kelo v New London 2005
8. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
9. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Smith v Allwright 1944
Bush v Gore 2000
Betts v Brady 1942
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
10. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Roe v Wade 1973
Gitlow v NY 1925
11. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
New York Times v US 1971
12. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Betts v Brady 1942
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
13. Separate but equal for races
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
US v Nixon 1974
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Marbury v Madison 1803
14. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Olmstead v US 1928
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
15. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Virginia v Black 2002
Powell v Alabama 1932
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
16. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Dennis v US 1951
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
17. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Baker v Carr 1962
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
18. You can burn the flag
Korematsu v US 1944
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Texas v Johnson 1989
19. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Near v Minnesota 1931
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Miller v California 1973
New York Times v US 1971
20. Right to privacy
Gitlow v NY 1925
US v Nixon 1974
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
21. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Korematsu v US 1944
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
22. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Olmstead v US 1928
United States v Lopez 1995
23. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Betts v Brady 1942
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
24. Established exclusionary rule
Smith v Allwright 1944
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Weeks v US 1914
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
25. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
26. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Olmstead v US 1928
27. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Kelo v New London 2005
28. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Engel v Vitale 1962
Katz v US 1967
Near v Minnesota 1931
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
29. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
30. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
US v Nixon 1974
Lawrence v Texas 2003
31. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Miller v California 1973
Korematsu v US 1944
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
32. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Gitlow v NY 1925
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
33. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
34. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Dennis v US 1951
35. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Weeks v US 1914
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
36. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Clinton v New York 1998
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
37. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
United States v Lopez 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Lawrence v Texas 2003
38. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
39. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
40. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gitlow v NY 1925
Betts v Brady 1942
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
41. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
42. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gitlow v NY 1925
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
43. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Clinton v New York 1998
Katz v US 1967
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
44. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
45. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
New York Times v US 1971
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
46. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Baker v Carr 1962
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
47. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Korematsu v US 1944
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
48. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Betts v Brady 1942
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
49. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Dennis v US 1951
Bush v Gore 2000
50. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US v Nixon 1974
Dennis v US 1951