SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Virginia v Black 2002
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
2. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Smith v Allwright 1944
Fletcher v Peck 1810
3. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Korematsu v US 1944
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
4. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Furman v Georgia 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
5. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Furman v Georgia 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
6. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Olmstead v US 1928
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
7. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Marbury v Madison 1803
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
8. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Betts v Brady 1942
Gitlow v NY 1925
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Baker v Carr 1962
9. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Korematsu v US 1944
Dennis v US 1951
Gitlow v NY 1925
10. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
11. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US v Eichman 1990
Gregg v Georgia 1976
12. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Roe v Wade 1973
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
South Dakota v Dole 1987
13. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
Powell v Alabama 1932
14. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Virginia v Black 2002
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Katz v US 1967
15. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Near v Minnesota 1931
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
South Dakota v Dole 1987
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
16. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Engel v Vitale 1962
Kelo v New London 2005
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
17. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Olmstead v US 1928
Dennis v US 1951
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Roe v Wade 1973
18. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Weeks v US 1914
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Schenck v US 1919
19. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Kelo v New London 2005
New York Times v US 1971
20. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
South Dakota v Dole 1987
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Powell v Alabama 1932
21. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Furman v Georgia 1972
22. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Oregon v Elstad 1985
23. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Schenck v US 1919
24. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Korematsu v US 1944
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
25. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dennis v US 1951
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
26. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Kelo v New London 2005
Powell v Alabama 1932
Virginia v Black 2002
27. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Furman v Georgia 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lawrence v Texas 2003
28. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Kelo v New London 2005
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
29. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Furman v Georgia 1972
30. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Virginia v Black 2002
Near v Minnesota 1931
Betts v Brady 1942
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
31. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
32. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gitlow v NY 1925
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
33. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Roe v Wade 1973
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
34. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Bush v Gore 2000
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
35. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US v Nixon 1974
Gitlow v NY 1925
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
36. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Marbury v Madison 1803
Miller v California 1973
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
37. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
US v Eichman 1990
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Olmstead v US 1928
Texas v Johnson 1989
38. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Virginia v Black 2002
Bush v Gore 2000
Near v Minnesota 1931
39. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Kelo v New London 2005
Oregon v Elstad 1985
40. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Roe v Wade 1973
41. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
42. Established exclusionary rule
Miller v California 1973
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Weeks v US 1914
43. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Furman v Georgia 1972
Clinton v New York 1998
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
US v Nixon 1974
44. Right to privacy
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
45. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Miller v California 1973
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
46. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Bush v Gore 2000
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
47. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Miller v California 1973
48. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Dennis v US 1951
49. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Virginia v Black 2002
Clinton v New York 1998
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
50. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
New York Times v US 1971
Kelo v New London 2005
Fletcher v Peck 1810