SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Korematsu v US 1944
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
2. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Clinton v New York 1998
Powell v Alabama 1932
3. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
United States v Lopez 1995
4. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US v Eichman 1990
US v Nixon 1974
5. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Baker v Carr 1962
6. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Bush v Gore 2000
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Korematsu v US 1944
7. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Miranda v Arizona 1966
8. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
9. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Lawrence v Texas 2003
New York Times v US 1971
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
10. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Texas v Johnson 1989
Dennis v US 1951
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
11. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
12. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
US v Eichman 1990
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
13. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Baker v Carr 1962
Dennis v US 1951
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
14. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Miller v California 1973
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Engel v Vitale 1962
15. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Dennis v US 1951
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Marbury v Madison 1803
Buckley v Baleo 1976
16. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Weeks v US 1914
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Mapp v Ohio 1961
17. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gitlow v NY 1925
New York Times v US 1971
18. Right to privacy
Smith v Allwright 1944
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
19. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Betts v Brady 1942
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
20. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Betts v Brady 1942
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
21. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
22. Separate is not equal
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
South Dakota v Dole 1987
23. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Marbury v Madison 1803
Katz v US 1967
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Olmstead v US 1928
24. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Schenck v US 1919
Gitlow v NY 1925
25. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Roe v Wade 1973
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
26. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
27. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Weeks v US 1914
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
28. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Near v Minnesota 1931
29. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Near v Minnesota 1931
Korematsu v US 1944
30. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
31. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
32. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Virginia v Black 2002
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
33. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Buckley v Baleo 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
US v Nixon 1974
Miller v California 1973
34. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US v Nixon 1974
35. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Korematsu v US 1944
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
36. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
US v Eichman 1990
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
37. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
US v Eichman 1990
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Roe v Wade 1973
Furman v Georgia 1972
38. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Furman v Georgia 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
39. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Baker v Carr 1962
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Virginia v Black 2002
40. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Clinton v New York 1998
41. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Miller v California 1973
42. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
43. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Near v Minnesota 1931
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Miller v California 1973
44. Separate but equal for races
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miller v California 1973
45. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
46. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
South Dakota v Dole 1987
47. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Gitlow v NY 1925
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
48. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Bush v Gore 2000
South Dakota v Dole 1987
49. You can burn the flag
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
Betts v Brady 1942
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
50. Established exclusionary rule
Miranda v Arizona 1966
US v Eichman 1990
Weeks v US 1914
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests