SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Katz v US 1967
Roe v Wade 1973
Clinton v New York 1998
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
2. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Clinton v New York 1998
Kelo v New London 2005
Powell v Alabama 1932
3. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Miller v California 1973
Engel v Vitale 1962
US v Nixon 1974
4. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
5. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
6. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
7. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Virginia v Black 2002
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
8. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Clinton v New York 1998
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
9. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Texas v Johnson 1989
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
10. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Virginia v Black 2002
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
11. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Korematsu v US 1944
12. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
US v Nixon 1974
Mapp v Ohio 1961
13. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
New York Times v US 1971
Gitlow v NY 1925
Miller v California 1973
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
14. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Olmstead v US 1928
United States v Lopez 1995
15. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Baker v Carr 1962
Clinton v New York 1998
Dennis v US 1951
Powell v Alabama 1932
16. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Schenck v US 1919
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
17. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
18. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
19. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Mapp v Ohio 1961
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
20. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Virginia v Black 2002
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
21. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
US v Nixon 1974
22. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Schenck v US 1919
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
23. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Clinton v New York 1998
24. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
United States v Lopez 1995
25. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Texas v Johnson 1989
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
26. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
27. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Engel v Vitale 1962
Olmstead v US 1928
28. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Smith v Allwright 1944
29. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
30. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
United States v Lopez 1995
New York Times v US 1971
Clinton v New York 1998
Gregg v Georgia 1976
31. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Kelo v New London 2005
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
United States v Lopez 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
32. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dennis v US 1951
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
33. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Virginia v Black 2002
34. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Baker v Carr 1962
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
35. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Katz v US 1967
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Near v Minnesota 1931
36. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Katz v US 1967
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
37. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Smith v Allwright 1944
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
38. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Baker v Carr 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
39. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Nixon 1974
40. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
Texas v Johnson 1989
41. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Betts v Brady 1942
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
42. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Kelo v New London 2005
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gitlow v NY 1925
43. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Virginia v Black 2002
Roe v Wade 1973
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
44. Established exclusionary rule
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Weeks v US 1914
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
45. Established judicial review
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Marbury v Madison 1803
Kelo v New London 2005
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
46. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Schenck v US 1919
47. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
Betts v Brady 1942
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
48. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Barron v Baltimore 1819
New York Times v US 1971
Betts v Brady 1942
Buckley v Baleo 1976
49. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
50. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Weeks v US 1914
Bush v Gore 2000