SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Olmstead v US 1928
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Clinton v New York 1998
2. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
South Dakota v Dole 1987
3. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
United States v Lopez 1995
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
4. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Kelo v New London 2005
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Virginia v Black 2002
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
5. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Clinton v New York 1998
Near v Minnesota 1931
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
6. Right to privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Marbury v Madison 1803
7. Established exclusionary rule
Furman v Georgia 1972
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Weeks v US 1914
New York Times v US 1971
8. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
9. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Weeks v US 1914
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
10. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Furman v Georgia 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
Fletcher v Peck 1810
11. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Oregon v Elstad 1985
12. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Dennis v US 1951
Korematsu v US 1944
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
13. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Dennis v US 1951
Engel v Vitale 1962
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
14. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Powell v Alabama 1932
15. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Engel v Vitale 1962
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
New York Times v US 1971
16. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Katz v US 1967
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Clinton v New York 1998
Furman v Georgia 1972
17. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
18. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Fletcher v Peck 1810
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
19. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Roe v Wade 1973
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
20. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
US v Nixon 1974
Miller v California 1973
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
21. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Betts v Brady 1942
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
22. You can burn the flag
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
United States v Lopez 1995
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
23. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Baker v Carr 1962
Kelo v New London 2005
Katz v US 1967
Virginia v Black 2002
24. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Roe v Wade 1973
Olmstead v US 1928
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Oregon v Elstad 1985
25. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Engel v Vitale 1962
26. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Weeks v US 1914
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
27. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
28. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
29. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Fletcher v Peck 1810
30. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
New York Times v US 1971
Engel v Vitale 1962
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
31. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Roe v Wade 1973
Engel v Vitale 1962
32. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Smith v Allwright 1944
US v Eichman 1990
33. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Roe v Wade 1973
New York Times v US 1971
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
34. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Dennis v US 1951
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Gregg v Georgia 1976
35. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Clinton v New York 1998
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
36. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Betts v Brady 1942
37. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Barron v Baltimore 1819
United States v Lopez 1995
38. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
39. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Korematsu v US 1944
Betts v Brady 1942
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
40. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Miller v California 1973
Engel v Vitale 1962
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
41. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Betts v Brady 1942
US v Eichman 1990
42. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
New York Times v US 1971
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
43. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
US v Eichman 1990
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
44. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gitlow v NY 1925
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
45. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Near v Minnesota 1931
US v Nixon 1974
Dennis v US 1951
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
46. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US v Eichman 1990
Roe v Wade 1973
Furman v Georgia 1972
47. Established judicial review
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Bush v Gore 2000
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
48. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
49. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Korematsu v US 1944
Dennis v US 1951
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
50. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests