SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Betts v Brady 1942
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
2. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Olmstead v US 1928
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Engel v Vitale 1962
Baker v Carr 1962
3. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Olmstead v US 1928
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
4. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Katz v US 1967
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Lawrence v Texas 2003
5. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Katz v US 1967
Furman v Georgia 1972
6. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Marbury v Madison 1803
7. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Bush v Gore 2000
Lawrence v Texas 2003
8. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
9. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
US v Eichman 1990
Bush v Gore 2000
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gitlow v NY 1925
10. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Furman v Georgia 1972
Miller v California 1973
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
11. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Near v Minnesota 1931
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Olmstead v US 1928
12. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
US v Eichman 1990
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
13. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
14. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Roe v Wade 1973
Buckley v Baleo 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
15. You can burn the flag
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
16. Separate but equal for races
New York Times v US 1971
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
17. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Miller v California 1973
Schenck v US 1919
18. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
19. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Baker v Carr 1962
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
20. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
21. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gitlow v NY 1925
Katz v US 1967
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
22. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
US v Nixon 1974
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
23. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
24. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Weeks v US 1914
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
US v Nixon 1974
25. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Roe v Wade 1973
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Katz v US 1967
26. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Smith v Allwright 1944
Roe v Wade 1973
Dennis v US 1951
New York Times v US 1971
27. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Miranda v Arizona 1966
US v Nixon 1974
28. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
29. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Miller v California 1973
Olmstead v US 1928
Miranda v Arizona 1966
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
30. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Kelo v New London 2005
31. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Katz v US 1967
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
32. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Olmstead v US 1928
Katz v US 1967
Fletcher v Peck 1810
33. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
US v Nixon 1974
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
34. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Weeks v US 1914
35. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Baker v Carr 1962
United States v Lopez 1995
New York Times v US 1971
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
36. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Marbury v Madison 1803
Weeks v US 1914
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Virginia v Black 2002
37. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
38. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Texas v Johnson 1989
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
39. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Roe v Wade 1973
Korematsu v US 1944
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
40. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Near v Minnesota 1931
Virginia v Black 2002
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
41. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
United States v Lopez 1995
42. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Near v Minnesota 1931
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Furman v Georgia 1972
43. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
New York Times v US 1971
Miller v California 1973
44. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
US v Eichman 1990
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
45. Established judicial review
Olmstead v US 1928
Schenck v US 1919
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Marbury v Madison 1803
46. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Korematsu v US 1944
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Furman v Georgia 1972
47. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Schenck v US 1919
Roe v Wade 1973
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
48. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Schenck v US 1919
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
49. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Near v Minnesota 1931
50. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Smith v Allwright 1944
Engel v Vitale 1962
Miller v California 1973
Bush v Gore 2000