SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Clinton v New York 1998
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Texas v Johnson 1989
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
2. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Weeks v US 1914
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
3. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
4. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Olmstead v US 1928
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
US v Eichman 1990
Miranda v Arizona 1966
5. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Bush v Gore 2000
Gregg v Georgia 1976
6. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Marbury v Madison 1803
Kelo v New London 2005
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
7. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Baker v Carr 1962
Fletcher v Peck 1810
8. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
New York Times v US 1971
Powell v Alabama 1932
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
9. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Katz v US 1967
Betts v Brady 1942
Marbury v Madison 1803
Smith v Allwright 1944
10. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
New York Times v US 1971
11. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
United States v Lopez 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
12. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Mapp v Ohio 1961
US v Nixon 1974
Marbury v Madison 1803
13. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Furman v Georgia 1972
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gregg v Georgia 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
14. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
15. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
16. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Dennis v US 1951
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Bush v Gore 2000
Katz v US 1967
17. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Kelo v New London 2005
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
18. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
19. You can burn the flag
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Texas v Johnson 1989
Olmstead v US 1928
Near v Minnesota 1931
20. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Dennis v US 1951
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gregg v Georgia 1976
21. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
22. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Olmstead v US 1928
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Near v Minnesota 1931
23. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
New York Times v US 1971
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Lawrence v Texas 2003
24. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
United States v Lopez 1995
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
25. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Marbury v Madison 1803
Dennis v US 1951
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US v Nixon 1974
26. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Texas v Johnson 1989
Korematsu v US 1944
27. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Olmstead v US 1928
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lawrence v Texas 2003
28. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Near v Minnesota 1931
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
29. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
United States v Lopez 1995
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gregg v Georgia 1976
30. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
31. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
United States v Lopez 1995
Miller v California 1973
32. Separate is not equal
Gitlow v NY 1925
Near v Minnesota 1931
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
33. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
34. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Clinton v New York 1998
Dennis v US 1951
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Barron v Baltimore 1819
35. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Furman v Georgia 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
36. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
37. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Schenck v US 1919
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Roe v Wade 1973
38. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Near v Minnesota 1931
United States v Lopez 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
39. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
New York Times v US 1971
Dennis v US 1951
Smith v Allwright 1944
40. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Korematsu v US 1944
Dennis v US 1951
Furman v Georgia 1972
41. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Dennis v US 1951
Baker v Carr 1962
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
42. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Bush v Gore 2000
Betts v Brady 1942
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
43. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Virginia v Black 2002
Powell v Alabama 1932
44. Established exclusionary rule
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Weeks v US 1914
45. Established judicial review
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Dennis v US 1951
Marbury v Madison 1803
United States v Lopez 1995
46. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
US v Eichman 1990
Kelo v New London 2005
47. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Texas v Johnson 1989
Buckley v Baleo 1976
48. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Barron v Baltimore 1819
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bush v Gore 2000
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
49. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Miller v California 1973
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
50. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
New York Times v US 1971
Barron v Baltimore 1819