SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Weeks v US 1914
New York Times v US 1971
2. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Schenck v US 1919
Virginia v Black 2002
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
3. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
New York Times v US 1971
Miller v California 1973
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
4. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Powell v Alabama 1932
Oregon v Elstad 1985
5. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Miller v California 1973
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Marbury v Madison 1803
6. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Katz v US 1967
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Fletcher v Peck 1810
7. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
United States v Lopez 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
8. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Clinton v New York 1998
Barron v Baltimore 1819
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
9. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
10. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Roe v Wade 1973
Korematsu v US 1944
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
11. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Baker v Carr 1962
12. Established exclusionary rule
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Baker v Carr 1962
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Weeks v US 1914
13. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Weeks v US 1914
14. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
Clinton v New York 1998
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
15. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Barron v Baltimore 1819
16. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Texas v Johnson 1989
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
17. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
18. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
US v Eichman 1990
Buckley v Baleo 1976
19. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Bush v Gore 2000
Betts v Brady 1942
20. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Dennis v US 1951
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Fletcher v Peck 1810
21. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Furman v Georgia 1972
22. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Smith v Allwright 1944
US v Nixon 1974
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
23. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Schenck v US 1919
Kelo v New London 2005
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
24. You can burn the flag
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Engel v Vitale 1962
Texas v Johnson 1989
25. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Baker v Carr 1962
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
26. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Weeks v US 1914
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gregg v Georgia 1976
27. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Korematsu v US 1944
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
28. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Baker v Carr 1962
Engel v Vitale 1962
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Weeks v US 1914
29. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
30. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Miller v California 1973
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
31. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Mapp v Ohio 1961
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
32. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
33. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Bush v Gore 2000
Powell v Alabama 1932
Virginia v Black 2002
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
34. Right to privacy
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US v Eichman 1990
35. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
36. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Eichman 1990
Virginia v Black 2002
US v Nixon 1974
Katz v US 1967
37. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
38. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Powell v Alabama 1932
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
39. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
40. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Kelo v New London 2005
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Betts v Brady 1942
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
41. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Miller v California 1973
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
42. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Furman v Georgia 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Texas v Johnson 1989
43. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Baker v Carr 1962
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
44. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Roe v Wade 1973
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
Furman v Georgia 1972
45. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Miller v California 1973
Baker v Carr 1962
46. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Bush v Gore 2000
Mapp v Ohio 1961
47. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
48. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Kelo v New London 2005
Roe v Wade 1973
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Mapp v Ohio 1961
49. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Korematsu v US 1944
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
50. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Katz v US 1967
Bush v Gore 2000
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986