SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Miller v California 1973
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Schenck v US 1919
2. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Clinton v New York 1998
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
Weeks v US 1914
3. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
US v Nixon 1974
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
4. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Smith v Allwright 1944
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
5. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Powell v Alabama 1932
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
6. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
7. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
8. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Roe v Wade 1973
United States v Lopez 1995
9. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
10. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Lawrence v Texas 2003
11. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Baker v Carr 1962
Dennis v US 1951
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
12. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Kelo v New London 2005
Gitlow v NY 1925
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
13. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
New York Times v US 1971
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Fletcher v Peck 1810
14. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Weeks v US 1914
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
15. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Baker v Carr 1962
Gitlow v NY 1925
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
16. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
US v Eichman 1990
17. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Betts v Brady 1942
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Miranda v Arizona 1966
18. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Smith v Allwright 1944
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
19. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Furman v Georgia 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
20. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Smith v Allwright 1944
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Korematsu v US 1944
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
21. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Clinton v New York 1998
22. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Korematsu v US 1944
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
23. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
24. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Baker v Carr 1962
Kelo v New London 2005
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
25. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Dennis v US 1951
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
26. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
US v Nixon 1974
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Barron v Baltimore 1819
27. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
28. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Betts v Brady 1942
Clinton v New York 1998
29. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
United States v Lopez 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
30. Separate but equal for races
Olmstead v US 1928
Bush v Gore 2000
Weeks v US 1914
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
31. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Engel v Vitale 1962
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
32. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
33. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
New York Times v US 1971
US v Nixon 1974
34. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Furman v Georgia 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
35. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
US v Nixon 1974
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
36. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
37. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
38. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Mapp v Ohio 1961
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
New York Times v US 1971
39. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Olmstead v US 1928
Bush v Gore 2000
40. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Near v Minnesota 1931
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Marbury v Madison 1803
41. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Smith v Allwright 1944
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
42. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Dennis v US 1951
43. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Engel v Vitale 1962
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
44. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
45. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Weeks v US 1914
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Barron v Baltimore 1819
46. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
US v Eichman 1990
US v Nixon 1974
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Katz v US 1967
47. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Smith v Allwright 1944
48. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Powell v Alabama 1932
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
49. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Miranda v Arizona 1966
50. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Virginia v Black 2002
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969