SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Miller v California 1973
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
2. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Korematsu v US 1944
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
3. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Dennis v US 1951
Kelo v New London 2005
4. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Olmstead v US 1928
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
5. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Gitlow v NY 1925
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
6. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gregg v Georgia 1976
7. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
8. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Gitlow v NY 1925
Texas v Johnson 1989
Smith v Allwright 1944
Bush v Gore 2000
9. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
New York Times v US 1971
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
10. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Fletcher v Peck 1810
11. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Korematsu v US 1944
United States v Lopez 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
12. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Engel v Vitale 1962
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
13. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gitlow v NY 1925
14. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Smith v Allwright 1944
15. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Dennis v US 1951
Olmstead v US 1928
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Miranda v Arizona 1966
16. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Powell v Alabama 1932
Schenck v US 1919
17. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Oregon v Elstad 1985
New York Times v US 1971
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
18. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
19. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Virginia v Black 2002
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
South Dakota v Dole 1987
20. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Katz v US 1967
21. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Schenck v US 1919
Miller v California 1973
Kelo v New London 2005
Baker v Carr 1962
22. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Furman v Georgia 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Korematsu v US 1944
23. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
Bush v Gore 2000
Near v Minnesota 1931
24. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Kelo v New London 2005
Oregon v Elstad 1985
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
25. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Bush v Gore 2000
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
26. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
US v Nixon 1974
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
27. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
28. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Engel v Vitale 1962
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
29. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Katz v US 1967
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Korematsu v US 1944
US v Eichman 1990
30. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
US v Eichman 1990
31. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Furman v Georgia 1972
32. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Lawrence v Texas 2003
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
33. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Clinton v New York 1998
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Fletcher v Peck 1810
34. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Miller v California 1973
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Furman v Georgia 1972
US v Eichman 1990
35. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Bush v Gore 2000
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
36. Established judicial review
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Marbury v Madison 1803
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
37. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
38. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Korematsu v US 1944
Near v Minnesota 1931
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
39. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Gitlow v NY 1925
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Fletcher v Peck 1810
40. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Roe v Wade 1973
Smith v Allwright 1944
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Baker v Carr 1962
41. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
Powell v Alabama 1932
42. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Korematsu v US 1944
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
43. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Texas v Johnson 1989
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
44. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Dennis v US 1951
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
45. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Engel v Vitale 1962
Weeks v US 1914
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Roe v Wade 1973
46. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Olmstead v US 1928
47. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
US v Nixon 1974
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
48. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Baker v Carr 1962
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Oregon v Elstad 1985
49. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Powell v Alabama 1932
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
50. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Clinton v New York 1998
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Weeks v US 1914