SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
2. Separate but equal for races
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Furman v Georgia 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Fletcher v Peck 1810
3. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
4. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Dennis v US 1951
Marbury v Madison 1803
Virginia v Black 2002
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
5. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Furman v Georgia 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Powell v Alabama 1932
Betts v Brady 1942
6. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
7. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lawrence v Texas 2003
New York Times v US 1971
8. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Dennis v US 1951
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
9. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Powell v Alabama 1932
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
10. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Smith v Allwright 1944
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
11. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Schenck v US 1919
Smith v Allwright 1944
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
12. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
13. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
US v Nixon 1974
Miranda v Arizona 1966
14. Right to privacy
Near v Minnesota 1931
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
New York Times v US 1971
15. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
New York Times v US 1971
Kelo v New London 2005
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
16. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Bush v Gore 2000
Clinton v New York 1998
New York Times v US 1971
17. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Kelo v New London 2005
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Mapp v Ohio 1961
18. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
US v Eichman 1990
Engel v Vitale 1962
Korematsu v US 1944
19. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
Korematsu v US 1944
20. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Roe v Wade 1973
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
21. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Katz v US 1967
Fletcher v Peck 1810
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
22. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
23. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Marbury v Madison 1803
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
24. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Virginia v Black 2002
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
25. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Eichman 1990
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Oregon v Elstad 1985
26. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Engel v Vitale 1962
New York Times v US 1971
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Roe v Wade 1973
27. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Korematsu v US 1944
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
28. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Smith v Allwright 1944
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
29. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Gitlow v NY 1925
30. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Buckley v Baleo 1976
31. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
32. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
33. Established judicial review
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
Furman v Georgia 1972
34. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Miranda v Arizona 1966
35. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
36. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
Clinton v New York 1998
Schenck v US 1919
37. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lawrence v Texas 2003
38. You can burn the flag
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Texas v Johnson 1989
Fletcher v Peck 1810
United States v Lopez 1995
39. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Weeks v US 1914
United States v Lopez 1995
40. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Betts v Brady 1942
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lawrence v Texas 2003
41. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Olmstead v US 1928
US v Nixon 1974
Betts v Brady 1942
42. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Katz v US 1967
Engel v Vitale 1962
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Roe v Wade 1973
43. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Roe v Wade 1973
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
44. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
45. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Katz v US 1967
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Furman v Georgia 1972
46. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
47. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
48. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Korematsu v US 1944
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
49. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
New York Times v US 1971
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gregg v Georgia 1976
50. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Kelo v New London 2005
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Mapp v Ohio 1961