SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Baker v Carr 1962
Fletcher v Peck 1810
2. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
US v Nixon 1974
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gitlow v NY 1925
3. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Furman v Georgia 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
4. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
US v Nixon 1974
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Katz v US 1967
5. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Clinton v New York 1998
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
6. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
7. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Near v Minnesota 1931
Furman v Georgia 1972
8. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
9. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Texas v Johnson 1989
New York Times v US 1971
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Fletcher v Peck 1810
10. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
11. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
US v Eichman 1990
Engel v Vitale 1962
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Clinton v New York 1998
12. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Miller v California 1973
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
13. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Schenck v US 1919
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
14. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Roe v Wade 1973
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Miller v California 1973
15. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
16. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Miller v California 1973
Virginia v Black 2002
Powell v Alabama 1932
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
17. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Texas v Johnson 1989
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
18. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
19. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
New York Times v US 1971
20. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Schenck v US 1919
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Furman v Georgia 1972
21. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
US v Eichman 1990
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
United States v Lopez 1995
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
22. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
Furman v Georgia 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
23. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
US v Nixon 1974
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Betts v Brady 1942
24. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Near v Minnesota 1931
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gregg v Georgia 1976
25. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Baker v Carr 1962
Katz v US 1967
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
26. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Weeks v US 1914
Powell v Alabama 1932
27. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Katz v US 1967
Fletcher v Peck 1810
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Bush v Gore 2000
28. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Smith v Allwright 1944
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
29. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Near v Minnesota 1931
30. Right to privacy
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Smith v Allwright 1944
31. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Bush v Gore 2000
Powell v Alabama 1932
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
32. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
33. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Near v Minnesota 1931
Betts v Brady 1942
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
34. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Dennis v US 1951
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
35. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Roe v Wade 1973
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
36. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Weeks v US 1914
Betts v Brady 1942
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
37. Established judicial review
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Marbury v Madison 1803
Korematsu v US 1944
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
38. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
39. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Betts v Brady 1942
Miller v California 1973
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
40. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
US v Nixon 1974
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
Barron v Baltimore 1819
41. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gitlow v NY 1925
42. Separate is not equal
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Betts v Brady 1942
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
43. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
New York Times v US 1971
Powell v Alabama 1932
Bush v Gore 2000
44. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Weeks v US 1914
US v Nixon 1974
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Dennis v US 1951
45. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Marbury v Madison 1803
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Texas v Johnson 1989
46. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Schenck v US 1919
Oregon v Elstad 1985
47. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
48. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Olmstead v US 1928
Marbury v Madison 1803
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
49. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
New York Times v US 1971
Virginia v Black 2002
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
50. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Engel v Vitale 1962
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Marbury v Madison 1803