SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Engel v Vitale 1962
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
2. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Baker v Carr 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Miller v California 1973
3. Established judicial review
Weeks v US 1914
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Marbury v Madison 1803
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
4. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Furman v Georgia 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
5. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Marbury v Madison 1803
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
6. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
7. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Schenck v US 1919
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Buckley v Baleo 1976
8. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
9. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Engel v Vitale 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
10. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Mapp v Ohio 1961
US v Eichman 1990
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
11. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Olmstead v US 1928
12. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Korematsu v US 1944
13. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Schenck v US 1919
Engel v Vitale 1962
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
14. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
Schenck v US 1919
Miranda v Arizona 1966
15. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
16. You can burn the flag
US v Nixon 1974
Roe v Wade 1973
Katz v US 1967
Texas v Johnson 1989
17. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
18. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Schenck v US 1919
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
19. Separate but equal for races
Furman v Georgia 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Weeks v US 1914
Barron v Baltimore 1819
20. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
New York Times v US 1971
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
21. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
Gitlow v NY 1925
Oregon v Elstad 1985
United States v Lopez 1995
22. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
23. Separate is not equal
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miller v California 1973
24. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Roe v Wade 1973
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
25. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Near v Minnesota 1931
Smith v Allwright 1944
Engel v Vitale 1962
Weeks v US 1914
26. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Miranda v Arizona 1966
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Furman v Georgia 1972
Katz v US 1967
27. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
28. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
New York Times v US 1971
29. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Gitlow v NY 1925
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
30. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Marbury v Madison 1803
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
31. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
Lawrence v Texas 2003
32. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Weeks v US 1914
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
33. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
New York Times v US 1971
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
34. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
United States v Lopez 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
35. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Roe v Wade 1973
Baker v Carr 1962
Katz v US 1967
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
36. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Dennis v US 1951
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Miranda v Arizona 1966
37. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Roe v Wade 1973
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Betts v Brady 1942
38. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
39. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Betts v Brady 1942
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
40. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
41. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Baker v Carr 1962
Furman v Georgia 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
42. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Clinton v New York 1998
Lawrence v Texas 2003
43. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
New York Times v US 1971
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
44. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Engel v Vitale 1962
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US v Nixon 1974
45. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Betts v Brady 1942
46. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Clinton v New York 1998
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
47. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
48. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gitlow v NY 1925
US v Nixon 1974
49. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Engel v Vitale 1962
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
50. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
DeJonge v Oregon 1937