SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Korematsu v US 1944
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US v Nixon 1974
Miranda v Arizona 1966
2. Right to privacy
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gitlow v NY 1925
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
United States v Lopez 1995
3. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Oregon v Elstad 1985
4. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Powell v Alabama 1932
Texas v Johnson 1989
Engel v Vitale 1962
5. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
US v Nixon 1974
Clinton v New York 1998
Powell v Alabama 1932
Buckley v Baleo 1976
6. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
7. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Katz v US 1967
Virginia v Black 2002
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
8. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Smith v Allwright 1944
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
9. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Texas v Johnson 1989
Miller v California 1973
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Katz v US 1967
10. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Fletcher v Peck 1810
11. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
12. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
US v Nixon 1974
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
13. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Barron v Baltimore 1819
US v Nixon 1974
Gregg v Georgia 1976
14. Separate is not equal
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
15. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Powell v Alabama 1932
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US v Nixon 1974
US v Eichman 1990
16. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Schenck v US 1919
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Virginia v Black 2002
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
17. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US v Eichman 1990
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
18. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
19. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
Powell v Alabama 1932
20. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Roe v Wade 1973
21. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Kelo v New London 2005
Powell v Alabama 1932
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Betts v Brady 1942
22. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
US v Eichman 1990
Furman v Georgia 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
23. You can burn the flag
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Texas v Johnson 1989
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
24. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Bush v Gore 2000
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
25. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
26. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Dennis v US 1951
27. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Furman v Georgia 1972
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
28. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Kelo v New London 2005
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
29. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Katz v US 1967
30. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
31. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Marbury v Madison 1803
Olmstead v US 1928
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
32. Separate but equal for races
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
United States v Lopez 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
33. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
34. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Texas v Johnson 1989
35. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Virginia v Black 2002
Bush v Gore 2000
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
36. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US v Nixon 1974
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
United States v Lopez 1995
37. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gregg v Georgia 1976
38. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Roe v Wade 1973
Smith v Allwright 1944
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
39. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
US v Eichman 1990
Baker v Carr 1962
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
40. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
41. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gitlow v NY 1925
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
42. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Schenck v US 1919
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Weeks v US 1914
43. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Schenck v US 1919
Korematsu v US 1944
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
44. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
45. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
46. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
South Dakota v Dole 1987
47. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
US v Nixon 1974
Bush v Gore 2000
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
New York Times v US 1971
48. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Clinton v New York 1998
49. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
50. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Betts v Brady 1942
Katz v US 1967
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Katzenbach v McClung 1964