SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
2. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Weeks v US 1914
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Oregon v Elstad 1985
3. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Dennis v US 1951
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
4. Separate is not equal
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miller v California 1973
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
5. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Roe v Wade 1973
Bush v Gore 2000
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
6. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Bush v Gore 2000
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
7. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Kelo v New London 2005
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
8. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Powell v Alabama 1932
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
9. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Korematsu v US 1944
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
10. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Engel v Vitale 1962
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
11. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Clinton v New York 1998
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Dennis v US 1951
12. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
13. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Oregon v Elstad 1985
New York Times v US 1971
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Baker v Carr 1962
14. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Virginia v Black 2002
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
15. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Texas v Johnson 1989
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Weeks v US 1914
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
16. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US v Eichman 1990
Miranda v Arizona 1966
17. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miller v California 1973
Gregg v Georgia 1976
18. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Korematsu v US 1944
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Powell v Alabama 1932
19. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Virginia v Black 2002
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
20. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Furman v Georgia 1972
21. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Weeks v US 1914
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
22. Established exclusionary rule
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Weeks v US 1914
Engel v Vitale 1962
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
23. Separate but equal for races
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Weeks v US 1914
24. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Schenck v US 1919
25. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
26. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
27. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Marbury v Madison 1803
28. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Katz v US 1967
Korematsu v US 1944
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
29. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
30. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Bush v Gore 2000
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Virginia v Black 2002
Baker v Carr 1962
31. You can burn the flag
Virginia v Black 2002
Weeks v US 1914
Texas v Johnson 1989
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
32. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
33. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gitlow v NY 1925
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
34. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Bush v Gore 2000
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Olmstead v US 1928
35. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Clinton v New York 1998
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Roe v Wade 1973
New York Times v US 1971
36. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Furman v Georgia 1972
37. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
38. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Smith v Allwright 1944
Kelo v New London 2005
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
39. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Gregg v Georgia 1976
40. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
41. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
42. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Dennis v US 1951
Schenck v US 1919
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
43. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Clinton v New York 1998
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
44. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Fletcher v Peck 1810
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Near v Minnesota 1931
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
45. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US v Eichman 1990
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
46. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Engel v Vitale 1962
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dennis v US 1951
47. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
48. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Kelo v New London 2005
49. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Texas v Johnson 1989
Clinton v New York 1998
50. Established judicial review
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Marbury v Madison 1803
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests