SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Betts v Brady 1942
Baker v Carr 1962
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Barron v Baltimore 1819
2. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Smith v Allwright 1944
Schenck v US 1919
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
3. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Katz v US 1967
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
United States v Lopez 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
4. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Virginia v Black 2002
Mapp v Ohio 1961
5. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
6. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gregg v Georgia 1976
7. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
8. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Dennis v US 1951
Schenck v US 1919
Engel v Vitale 1962
Kelo v New London 2005
9. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Roe v Wade 1973
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
10. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Marbury v Madison 1803
Olmstead v US 1928
Katz v US 1967
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
11. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Virginia v Black 2002
12. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
13. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miranda v Arizona 1966
14. Established judicial review
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Weeks v US 1914
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
15. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Bush v Gore 2000
16. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Furman v Georgia 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
17. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Olmstead v US 1928
18. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Schenck v US 1919
Betts v Brady 1942
United States v Lopez 1995
Lawrence v Texas 2003
19. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Roe v Wade 1973
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
20. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Texas v Johnson 1989
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Bush v Gore 2000
21. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Baker v Carr 1962
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
22. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Smith v Allwright 1944
Barron v Baltimore 1819
US v Eichman 1990
Furman v Georgia 1972
23. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Olmstead v US 1928
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
24. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US v Nixon 1974
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
25. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Kelo v New London 2005
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Katz v US 1967
26. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Schenck v US 1919
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
New York Times v US 1971
Olmstead v US 1928
27. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Miller v California 1973
Engel v Vitale 1962
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
28. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Roe v Wade 1973
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
29. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Bush v Gore 2000
Powell v Alabama 1932
30. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Engel v Vitale 1962
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Korematsu v US 1944
Powell v Alabama 1932
31. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
32. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Korematsu v US 1944
Smith v Allwright 1944
33. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US v Eichman 1990
34. Established exclusionary rule
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Schenck v US 1919
Weeks v US 1914
Barron v Baltimore 1819
35. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Oregon v Elstad 1985
36. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Kelo v New London 2005
37. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gitlow v NY 1925
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
38. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
US v Nixon 1974
Engel v Vitale 1962
Betts v Brady 1942
Schenck v US 1919
39. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Katz v US 1967
US v Eichman 1990
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
40. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Texas v Johnson 1989
Korematsu v US 1944
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Dennis v US 1951
41. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Near v Minnesota 1931
New York Times v US 1971
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
42. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Texas v Johnson 1989
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
43. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Mapp v Ohio 1961
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Fletcher v Peck 1810
44. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Texas v Johnson 1989
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miller v California 1973
45. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gregg v Georgia 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
46. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
New York Times v US 1971
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
47. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Korematsu v US 1944
48. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dennis v US 1951
Weeks v US 1914
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
49. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Olmstead v US 1928
50. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Olmstead v US 1928
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969