SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Separate but equal for races
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
2. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Virginia v Black 2002
Gitlow v NY 1925
Schenck v US 1919
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
3. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US v Nixon 1974
4. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Marbury v Madison 1803
5. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Oregon v Elstad 1985
6. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Weeks v US 1914
Gitlow v NY 1925
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
7. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Virginia v Black 2002
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gregg v Georgia 1976
8. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Virginia v Black 2002
9. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Clinton v New York 1998
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
10. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Schenck v US 1919
Gregg v Georgia 1976
11. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
12. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Roe v Wade 1973
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Buckley v Baleo 1976
13. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
14. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Miranda v Arizona 1966
15. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
New York Times v US 1971
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
16. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katz v US 1967
Buckley v Baleo 1976
17. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
18. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Virginia v Black 2002
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
19. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
20. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Olmstead v US 1928
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
21. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Miller v California 1973
Weeks v US 1914
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
22. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US v Nixon 1974
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
23. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
24. You can burn the flag
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Virginia v Black 2002
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
25. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
26. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Engel v Vitale 1962
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
27. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Baker v Carr 1962
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US v Eichman 1990
28. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
US v Nixon 1974
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
29. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
30. Established judicial review
Miller v California 1973
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Olmstead v US 1928
Marbury v Madison 1803
31. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Gitlow v NY 1925
Fletcher v Peck 1810
32. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
33. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
New York Times v US 1971
Katz v US 1967
Barron v Baltimore 1819
34. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Marbury v Madison 1803
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US v Nixon 1974
35. Separate is not equal
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
36. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Katz v US 1967
Virginia v Black 2002
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Fletcher v Peck 1810
37. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Dennis v US 1951
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
38. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Dennis v US 1951
Buckley v Baleo 1976
39. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
US v Eichman 1990
Smith v Allwright 1944
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Fletcher v Peck 1810
40. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
41. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Clinton v New York 1998
42. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Lawrence v Texas 2003
New York Times v US 1971
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
43. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
United States v Lopez 1995
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
44. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Lawrence v Texas 2003
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
45. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
United States v Lopez 1995
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
46. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Weeks v US 1914
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Buckley v Baleo 1976
47. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Lawrence v Texas 2003
United States v Lopez 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
48. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
49. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Virginia v Black 2002
United States v Lopez 1995
Baker v Carr 1962
50. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Furman v Georgia 1972