SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
2. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
US v Nixon 1974
3. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
United States v Lopez 1995
Betts v Brady 1942
Kelo v New London 2005
4. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
US v Nixon 1974
Bush v Gore 2000
Dennis v US 1951
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
5. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Clinton v New York 1998
6. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
7. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Betts v Brady 1942
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US v Eichman 1990
Lawrence v Texas 2003
8. Right to privacy
Clinton v New York 1998
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
New York Times v US 1971
9. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Schenck v US 1919
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
10. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Katz v US 1967
US v Nixon 1974
Mapp v Ohio 1961
11. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Gitlow v NY 1925
Virginia v Black 2002
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Oregon v Elstad 1985
12. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
13. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Furman v Georgia 1972
14. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
15. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
US v Eichman 1990
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
16. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Furman v Georgia 1972
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Weeks v US 1914
17. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
18. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Powell v Alabama 1932
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Miller v California 1973
19. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Marbury v Madison 1803
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
20. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Schenck v US 1919
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Korematsu v US 1944
21. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dennis v US 1951
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
22. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
23. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katz v US 1967
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
24. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Roe v Wade 1973
Betts v Brady 1942
New York Times v US 1971
Schenck v US 1919
25. Separate but equal for races
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gitlow v NY 1925
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
26. Separate is not equal
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Weeks v US 1914
Buckley v Baleo 1976
27. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
28. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Baker v Carr 1962
29. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
30. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
31. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
32. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
33. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Buckley v Baleo 1976
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
34. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Schenck v US 1919
Virginia v Black 2002
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Lawrence v Texas 2003
35. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
36. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US v Eichman 1990
37. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miller v California 1973
38. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Kelo v New London 2005
United States v Lopez 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
39. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Smith v Allwright 1944
40. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
United States v Lopez 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
41. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Baker v Carr 1962
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
42. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Korematsu v US 1944
Smith v Allwright 1944
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
43. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gitlow v NY 1925
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
44. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Bush v Gore 2000
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
45. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Gitlow v NY 1925
Powell v Alabama 1932
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
46. Established exclusionary rule
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Weeks v US 1914
47. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Lawrence v Texas 2003
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Near v Minnesota 1931
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
48. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gitlow v NY 1925
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Near v Minnesota 1931
49. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Betts v Brady 1942
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Dennis v US 1951
50. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Gitlow v NY 1925
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Near v Minnesota 1931