SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US v Eichman 1990
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
2. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Oregon v Elstad 1985
New York Times v US 1971
3. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Gitlow v NY 1925
4. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Betts v Brady 1942
5. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
6. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Katz v US 1967
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
7. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
8. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Schenck v US 1919
9. Established judicial review
Furman v Georgia 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
10. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
US v Eichman 1990
New York Times v US 1971
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
11. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Smith v Allwright 1944
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Roe v Wade 1973
12. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Katz v US 1967
Bush v Gore 2000
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
13. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
14. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Near v Minnesota 1931
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
15. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Roe v Wade 1973
Texas v Johnson 1989
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
16. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
US v Eichman 1990
Schenck v US 1919
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
17. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Kelo v New London 2005
Near v Minnesota 1931
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
18. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Clinton v New York 1998
Gitlow v NY 1925
Roe v Wade 1973
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
19. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
20. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Lawrence v Texas 2003
21. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
New York Times v US 1971
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
22. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Olmstead v US 1928
Smith v Allwright 1944
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
23. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Weeks v US 1914
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Korematsu v US 1944
24. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Furman v Georgia 1972
25. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Gitlow v NY 1925
Betts v Brady 1942
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Miranda v Arizona 1966
26. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Powell v Alabama 1932
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
27. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Lawrence v Texas 2003
28. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Roe v Wade 1973
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
29. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
US v Nixon 1974
30. Separate is not equal
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US v Eichman 1990
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
31. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Korematsu v US 1944
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
32. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Baker v Carr 1962
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
33. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
34. Established exclusionary rule
Schenck v US 1919
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Weeks v US 1914
35. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Schenck v US 1919
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Fletcher v Peck 1810
36. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Near v Minnesota 1931
United States v Lopez 1995
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
37. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Dennis v US 1951
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
38. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Marbury v Madison 1803
39. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Roe v Wade 1973
Furman v Georgia 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Dennis v US 1951
40. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Texas v Johnson 1989
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Schenck v US 1919
Katz v US 1967
41. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
42. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
New York Times v US 1971
Korematsu v US 1944
US v Nixon 1974
43. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
United States v Lopez 1995
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Barron v Baltimore 1819
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
44. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Smith v Allwright 1944
45. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Kelo v New London 2005
Texas v Johnson 1989
Furman v Georgia 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
46. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Near v Minnesota 1931
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
47. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Baker v Carr 1962
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Miller v California 1973
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
48. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Kelo v New London 2005
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Engel v Vitale 1962
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
49. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Engel v Vitale 1962
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Buckley v Baleo 1976
50. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Bush v Gore 2000
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Powell v Alabama 1932
South Dakota v Dole 1987