SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Furman v Georgia 1972
2. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
3. You can burn the flag
Kelo v New London 2005
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Texas v Johnson 1989
4. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Texas v Johnson 1989
US v Eichman 1990
5. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Virginia v Black 2002
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
6. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
7. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
8. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Powell v Alabama 1932
9. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
10. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dennis v US 1951
Weeks v US 1914
Baker v Carr 1962
11. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
United States v Lopez 1995
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
12. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Miller v California 1973
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
South Dakota v Dole 1987
13. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Kelo v New London 2005
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Schenck v US 1919
14. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Dennis v US 1951
Virginia v Black 2002
15. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Texas v Johnson 1989
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
16. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Kelo v New London 2005
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Dennis v US 1951
17. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Near v Minnesota 1931
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Dennis v US 1951
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
18. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Powell v Alabama 1932
Roe v Wade 1973
Weeks v US 1914
19. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Baker v Carr 1962
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
20. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Dennis v US 1951
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
21. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Furman v Georgia 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Korematsu v US 1944
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
22. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Schenck v US 1919
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
23. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Engel v Vitale 1962
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
24. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
Betts v Brady 1942
Barron v Baltimore 1819
25. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Near v Minnesota 1931
26. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
27. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
28. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Bush v Gore 2000
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
29. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Near v Minnesota 1931
30. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Engel v Vitale 1962
Dennis v US 1951
Baker v Carr 1962
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
31. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
32. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dennis v US 1951
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
33. Established judicial review
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Marbury v Madison 1803
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Roe v Wade 1973
34. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Korematsu v US 1944
Miller v California 1973
35. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Weeks v US 1914
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
36. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
United States v Lopez 1995
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Engel v Vitale 1962
37. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
38. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Katz v US 1967
39. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Roe v Wade 1973
Gitlow v NY 1925
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
40. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
41. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Schenck v US 1919
New York Times v US 1971
42. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US v Nixon 1974
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
43. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Miller v California 1973
Olmstead v US 1928
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
44. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Texas v Johnson 1989
Marbury v Madison 1803
Olmstead v US 1928
Mapp v Ohio 1961
45. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Furman v Georgia 1972
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Virginia v Black 2002
46. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Miller v California 1973
Mapp v Ohio 1961
United States v Lopez 1995
47. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
48. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Miller v California 1973
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Buckley v Baleo 1976
49. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Katz v US 1967
Oregon v Elstad 1985
50. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miller v California 1973
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Cox v New Hampshire 1941