SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Furman v Georgia 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Schenck v US 1919
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
2. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Clinton v New York 1998
Bush v Gore 2000
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miller v California 1973
3. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katz v US 1967
4. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
5. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Engel v Vitale 1962
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
6. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Clinton v New York 1998
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
7. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Miller v California 1973
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
US v Eichman 1990
8. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Powell v Alabama 1932
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
9. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Marbury v Madison 1803
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
10. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Furman v Georgia 1972
11. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Schenck v US 1919
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
12. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Korematsu v US 1944
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Olmstead v US 1928
13. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
14. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Furman v Georgia 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Texas v Johnson 1989
15. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Bush v Gore 2000
16. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Texas v Johnson 1989
17. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Clinton v New York 1998
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
18. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gregg v Georgia 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
19. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
New York Times v US 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
20. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Katz v US 1967
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
21. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
United States v Lopez 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
Katz v US 1967
Mapp v Ohio 1961
22. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US v Eichman 1990
23. You can burn the flag
Smith v Allwright 1944
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Korematsu v US 1944
24. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US v Nixon 1974
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
25. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
US v Eichman 1990
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
26. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Virginia v Black 2002
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Baker v Carr 1962
27. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Powell v Alabama 1932
Texas v Johnson 1989
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
28. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
29. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Gitlow v NY 1925
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Miranda v Arizona 1966
30. Separate is not equal
Korematsu v US 1944
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
US v Nixon 1974
31. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Near v Minnesota 1931
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
32. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
US v Eichman 1990
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
33. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Roe v Wade 1973
Miller v California 1973
US v Eichman 1990
34. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
35. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Miller v California 1973
36. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
37. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Bush v Gore 2000
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
38. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Clinton v New York 1998
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
39. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
United States v Lopez 1995
40. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Texas v Johnson 1989
Furman v Georgia 1972
US v Eichman 1990
41. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Kelo v New London 2005
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
New York Times v US 1971
42. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
US v Eichman 1990
43. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
New York Times v US 1971
Weeks v US 1914
44. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Virginia v Black 2002
45. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Miller v California 1973
Baker v Carr 1962
46. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Gitlow v NY 1925
United States v Lopez 1995
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Miller v California 1973
47. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Powell v Alabama 1932
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
48. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Dennis v US 1951
Baker v Carr 1962
Bush v Gore 2000
Kelo v New London 2005
49. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
50. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Powell v Alabama 1932
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000