SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
2. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Dennis v US 1951
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Betts v Brady 1942
3. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
4. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
New York Times v US 1971
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
5. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Lawrence v Texas 2003
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
6. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Kelo v New London 2005
Katz v US 1967
7. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Clinton v New York 1998
8. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Weeks v US 1914
Gitlow v NY 1925
9. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
10. You can burn the flag
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Engel v Vitale 1962
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katz v US 1967
11. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Near v Minnesota 1931
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
12. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Bush v Gore 2000
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
13. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Powell v Alabama 1932
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
14. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
United States v Lopez 1995
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Olmstead v US 1928
15. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Miranda v Arizona 1966
16. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Lawrence v Texas 2003
US v Nixon 1974
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
17. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Engel v Vitale 1962
18. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gitlow v NY 1925
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
19. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
20. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
New York Times v US 1971
Kelo v New London 2005
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Oregon v Elstad 1985
21. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Near v Minnesota 1931
Dennis v US 1951
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Texas v Johnson 1989
22. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
United States v Lopez 1995
23. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Dennis v US 1951
24. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
25. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Miller v California 1973
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Fletcher v Peck 1810
26. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Bush v Gore 2000
27. Separate is not equal
Virginia v Black 2002
US v Nixon 1974
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
28. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US v Nixon 1974
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
29. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
30. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Schenck v US 1919
31. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
32. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Clinton v New York 1998
US v Nixon 1974
33. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Smith v Allwright 1944
34. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US v Nixon 1974
Weeks v US 1914
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
35. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
US v Eichman 1990
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Dennis v US 1951
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
36. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
37. Established judicial review
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Marbury v Madison 1803
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Olmstead v US 1928
38. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Barron v Baltimore 1819
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Miller v California 1973
39. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Virginia v Black 2002
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
40. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
41. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Marbury v Madison 1803
United States v Lopez 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
42. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Miller v California 1973
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Miranda v Arizona 1966
43. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Texas v Johnson 1989
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US v Eichman 1990
44. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
New York Times v US 1971
Smith v Allwright 1944
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
45. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
46. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Engel v Vitale 1962
Schenck v US 1919
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
47. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Smith v Allwright 1944
Katz v US 1967
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
48. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
49. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
50. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Betts v Brady 1942
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests