SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Weeks v US 1914
Roe v Wade 1973
Kelo v New London 2005
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
2. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
3. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Korematsu v US 1944
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Dennis v US 1951
Mapp v Ohio 1961
4. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
New York Times v US 1971
5. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Betts v Brady 1942
Powell v Alabama 1932
Dennis v US 1951
Mapp v Ohio 1961
6. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Dennis v US 1951
Powell v Alabama 1932
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
7. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Engel v Vitale 1962
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
8. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Gregg v Georgia 1976
9. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gregg v Georgia 1976
10. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
US v Nixon 1974
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miller v California 1973
11. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Engel v Vitale 1962
Barron v Baltimore 1819
12. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Clinton v New York 1998
13. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
14. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Near v Minnesota 1931
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
15. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Schenck v US 1919
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Dennis v US 1951
16. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Virginia v Black 2002
Gitlow v NY 1925
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Miranda v Arizona 1966
17. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
18. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Smith v Allwright 1944
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
19. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dennis v US 1951
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Near v Minnesota 1931
20. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Gitlow v NY 1925
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
21. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Clinton v New York 1998
US v Nixon 1974
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
22. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Miller v California 1973
US v Nixon 1974
US v Eichman 1990
23. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
24. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Bush v Gore 2000
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miller v California 1973
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
25. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Schenck v US 1919
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
26. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Oregon v Elstad 1985
US v Eichman 1990
27. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
28. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gitlow v NY 1925
Schenck v US 1919
Texas v Johnson 1989
29. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
30. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Roe v Wade 1973
Marbury v Madison 1803
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
31. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Kelo v New London 2005
Korematsu v US 1944
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
32. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Furman v Georgia 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
33. Separate is not equal
Near v Minnesota 1931
Kelo v New London 2005
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Dennis v US 1951
34. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
35. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Dennis v US 1951
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
36. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Korematsu v US 1944
Katz v US 1967
37. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Korematsu v US 1944
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
38. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
39. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Betts v Brady 1942
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
40. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Katz v US 1967
41. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Bush v Gore 2000
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Korematsu v US 1944
42. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
43. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
44. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Roe v Wade 1973
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Smith v Allwright 1944
45. Separate but equal for races
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Oregon v Elstad 1985
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
46. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Weeks v US 1914
Kelo v New London 2005
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
47. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Lawrence v Texas 2003
48. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
US v Nixon 1974
Powell v Alabama 1932
49. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Texas v Johnson 1989
Dennis v US 1951
Korematsu v US 1944
50. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972