SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. You can burn the flag
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Texas v Johnson 1989
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Engel v Vitale 1962
2. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Korematsu v US 1944
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
3. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
4. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
5. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Engel v Vitale 1962
Weeks v US 1914
Fletcher v Peck 1810
6. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Weeks v US 1914
Korematsu v US 1944
United States v Lopez 1995
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
7. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
8. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Baker v Carr 1962
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
9. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
10. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Schenck v US 1919
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
11. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Bush v Gore 2000
12. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Smith v Allwright 1944
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
13. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
14. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Roe v Wade 1973
Powell v Alabama 1932
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
15. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
Smith v Allwright 1944
16. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Betts v Brady 1942
Engel v Vitale 1962
Mapp v Ohio 1961
New York Times v US 1971
17. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Korematsu v US 1944
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Katz v US 1967
Furman v Georgia 1972
18. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Dennis v US 1951
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
19. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
20. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Furman v Georgia 1972
Miller v California 1973
Katz v US 1967
Bush v Gore 2000
21. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
US v Eichman 1990
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Baker v Carr 1962
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
22. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
23. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
South Dakota v Dole 1987
24. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
25. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Betts v Brady 1942
Olmstead v US 1928
26. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Powell v Alabama 1932
United States v Lopez 1995
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
27. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
28. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
29. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
30. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Korematsu v US 1944
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
31. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Smith v Allwright 1944
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
32. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
US v Nixon 1974
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gregg v Georgia 1976
33. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Katz v US 1967
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
34. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Clinton v New York 1998
Kelo v New London 2005
35. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
36. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
37. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Betts v Brady 1942
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
38. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Virginia v Black 2002
Clinton v New York 1998
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dennis v US 1951
39. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
40. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Weeks v US 1914
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Engel v Vitale 1962
41. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Kelo v New London 2005
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
42. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
US v Eichman 1990
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Marbury v Madison 1803
Barron v Baltimore 1819
43. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Dennis v US 1951
Baker v Carr 1962
44. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Betts v Brady 1942
Katz v US 1967
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
45. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Near v Minnesota 1931
Smith v Allwright 1944
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
46. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Virginia v Black 2002
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
Schenck v US 1919
47. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Korematsu v US 1944
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Furman v Georgia 1972
48. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
United States v Lopez 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
49. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Texas v Johnson 1989
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
50. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Gitlow v NY 1925
US v Eichman 1990
Plessy v Ferguson 1896