SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Bush v Gore 2000
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
2. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Marbury v Madison 1803
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Engel v Vitale 1962
3. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Schenck v US 1919
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
4. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Schenck v US 1919
5. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dennis v US 1951
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
6. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Miller v California 1973
Dennis v US 1951
7. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
8. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Baker v Carr 1962
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
9. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Furman v Georgia 1972
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Near v Minnesota 1931
10. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Dennis v US 1951
Near v Minnesota 1931
11. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Gregg v Georgia 1976
12. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
United States v Lopez 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
13. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
14. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Engel v Vitale 1962
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
15. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
US v Nixon 1974
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Olmstead v US 1928
Weeks v US 1914
16. Right to privacy
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
17. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
18. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Betts v Brady 1942
19. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Virginia v Black 2002
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
20. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Roe v Wade 1973
United States v Lopez 1995
21. Separate but equal for races
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
22. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Olmstead v US 1928
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
23. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Gitlow v NY 1925
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
24. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Barron v Baltimore 1819
25. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
United States v Lopez 1995
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
New York Times v US 1971
26. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
New York Times v US 1971
Roe v Wade 1973
Kelo v New London 2005
27. Separate is not equal
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
28. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Fletcher v Peck 1810
29. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
30. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Baker v Carr 1962
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
31. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
32. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
33. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
34. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Texas v Johnson 1989
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
35. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
36. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Eichman 1990
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
37. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Schenck v US 1919
US v Nixon 1974
38. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
New York Times v US 1971
Gregg v Georgia 1976
39. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
40. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Clinton v New York 1998
Miller v California 1973
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
41. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
New York Times v US 1971
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
42. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Korematsu v US 1944
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
43. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gitlow v NY 1925
44. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Betts v Brady 1942
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
45. You can burn the flag
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Texas v Johnson 1989
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
46. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
47. Established judicial review
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Weeks v US 1914
Betts v Brady 1942
Marbury v Madison 1803
48. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Clinton v New York 1998
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
Oregon v Elstad 1985
49. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Olmstead v US 1928
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
50. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Buckley v Baleo 1976
New York Times v US 1971
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests