SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Separate is not equal
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Miller v California 1973
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
2. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
New York Times v US 1971
3. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
4. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Marbury v Madison 1803
Baker v Carr 1962
5. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Bush v Gore 2000
Clinton v New York 1998
Weeks v US 1914
6. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Kelo v New London 2005
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Smith v Allwright 1944
7. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
US v Eichman 1990
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Kelo v New London 2005
Smith v Allwright 1944
8. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Dennis v US 1951
9. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Near v Minnesota 1931
Texas v Johnson 1989
10. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Miller v California 1973
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
11. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Gitlow v NY 1925
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Betts v Brady 1942
Miranda v Arizona 1966
12. Established judicial review
United States v Lopez 1995
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Marbury v Madison 1803
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
13. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Roe v Wade 1973
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
US v Eichman 1990
14. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
US v Nixon 1974
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
15. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Marbury v Madison 1803
16. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Betts v Brady 1942
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
New York Times v US 1971
17. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Bush v Gore 2000
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Kelo v New London 2005
18. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
US v Nixon 1974
Smith v Allwright 1944
Virginia v Black 2002
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
19. Established exclusionary rule
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
Weeks v US 1914
20. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
United States v Lopez 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Fletcher v Peck 1810
21. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Near v Minnesota 1931
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Furman v Georgia 1972
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
22. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Roe v Wade 1973
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
23. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Powell v Alabama 1932
Betts v Brady 1942
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Gregg v Georgia 1976
24. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Texas v Johnson 1989
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Near v Minnesota 1931
25. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
United States v Lopez 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
26. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Near v Minnesota 1931
Katz v US 1967
Engel v Vitale 1962
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
27. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Clinton v New York 1998
28. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Katz v US 1967
29. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
US v Eichman 1990
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
30. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Baker v Carr 1962
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Kelo v New London 2005
31. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Smith v Allwright 1944
Texas v Johnson 1989
32. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Miller v California 1973
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
33. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Kelo v New London 2005
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Texas v Johnson 1989
34. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Katz v US 1967
Powell v Alabama 1932
35. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gitlow v NY 1925
Smith v Allwright 1944
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
36. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
37. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Marbury v Madison 1803
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
38. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Betts v Brady 1942
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
New York Times v US 1971
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
39. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
40. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
41. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Weeks v US 1914
Betts v Brady 1942
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
42. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Marbury v Madison 1803
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Fletcher v Peck 1810
43. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Korematsu v US 1944
44. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Miranda v Arizona 1966
United States v Lopez 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
45. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Olmstead v US 1928
Dennis v US 1951
Mapp v Ohio 1961
46. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Korematsu v US 1944
Roe v Wade 1973
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
South Dakota v Dole 1987
47. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Korematsu v US 1944
US v Eichman 1990
48. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Korematsu v US 1944
United States v Lopez 1995
Powell v Alabama 1932
49. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
50. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
Baker v Carr 1962