SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
2. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
New York Times v US 1971
Mapp v Ohio 1961
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
3. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Schenck v US 1919
Engel v Vitale 1962
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
4. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Katz v US 1967
US v Nixon 1974
Smith v Allwright 1944
Mapp v Ohio 1961
5. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gregg v Georgia 1976
6. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Miranda v Arizona 1966
7. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
8. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Katz v US 1967
9. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Schenck v US 1919
US v Eichman 1990
10. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Schenck v US 1919
11. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Weeks v US 1914
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
12. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
13. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
United States v Lopez 1995
14. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
New York Times v US 1971
Olmstead v US 1928
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
15. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Betts v Brady 1942
16. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Olmstead v US 1928
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Clinton v New York 1998
17. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
18. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Baker v Carr 1962
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
19. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Virginia v Black 2002
20. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
New York Times v US 1971
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
21. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Dennis v US 1951
US v Eichman 1990
22. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Dennis v US 1951
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Olmstead v US 1928
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
23. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Powell v Alabama 1932
24. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Baker v Carr 1962
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Bush v Gore 2000
United States v Lopez 1995
25. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Near v Minnesota 1931
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
26. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
27. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
United States v Lopez 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
28. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
United States v Lopez 1995
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
29. Established exclusionary rule
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Gitlow v NY 1925
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Weeks v US 1914
30. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Roe v Wade 1973
Furman v Georgia 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
31. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Furman v Georgia 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
US v Eichman 1990
32. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
33. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Oregon v Elstad 1985
34. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
US v Nixon 1974
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Miranda v Arizona 1966
35. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Schenck v US 1919
Katz v US 1967
36. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
United States v Lopez 1995
Dennis v US 1951
Marbury v Madison 1803
37. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Miller v California 1973
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Barron v Baltimore 1819
38. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Korematsu v US 1944
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
39. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Texas v Johnson 1989
Powell v Alabama 1932
40. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
41. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Kelo v New London 2005
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Powell v Alabama 1932
42. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
43. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Baker v Carr 1962
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
44. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Roe v Wade 1973
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
45. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Schenck v US 1919
46. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
47. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Schenck v US 1919
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
48. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
49. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
50. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
DeJonge v Oregon 1937