SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
2. Right to privacy
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
3. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Clinton v New York 1998
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Miller v California 1973
United States v Lopez 1995
4. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
5. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Olmstead v US 1928
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
6. Established exclusionary rule
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Gitlow v NY 1925
Weeks v US 1914
7. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Smith v Allwright 1944
Bush v Gore 2000
8. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
US v Eichman 1990
Powell v Alabama 1932
9. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Baker v Carr 1962
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Dennis v US 1951
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
10. Established judicial review
United States v Lopez 1995
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
11. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
12. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Smith v Allwright 1944
Fletcher v Peck 1810
13. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
US v Nixon 1974
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
14. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Baker v Carr 1962
Near v Minnesota 1931
US v Nixon 1974
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
15. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Schenck v US 1919
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Clinton v New York 1998
16. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Miller v California 1973
Schenck v US 1919
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
17. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
Dennis v US 1951
Korematsu v US 1944
18. You can burn the flag
Powell v Alabama 1932
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Texas v Johnson 1989
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
19. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Schenck v US 1919
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
20. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
21. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Bush v Gore 2000
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gitlow v NY 1925
22. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Miranda v Arizona 1966
23. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Dennis v US 1951
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Katz v US 1967
Betts v Brady 1942
24. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
25. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Katz v US 1967
26. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Korematsu v US 1944
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
27. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
New York Times v US 1971
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
28. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Baker v Carr 1962
29. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Bush v Gore 2000
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
30. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
31. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
32. Separate is not equal
Weeks v US 1914
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Powell v Alabama 1932
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
33. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
United States v Lopez 1995
34. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
United States v Lopez 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
35. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Powell v Alabama 1932
New York Times v US 1971
Baker v Carr 1962
36. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Weeks v US 1914
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
37. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Buckley v Baleo 1976
38. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Weeks v US 1914
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Texas v Johnson 1989
39. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Kelo v New London 2005
40. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
41. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Texas v Johnson 1989
Weeks v US 1914
42. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Weeks v US 1914
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
43. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Miller v California 1973
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Near v Minnesota 1931
44. Separate but equal for races
Furman v Georgia 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Virginia v Black 2002
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
45. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Barron v Baltimore 1819
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
Miller v California 1973
46. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Baker v Carr 1962
Dennis v US 1951
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Engel v Vitale 1962
47. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Olmstead v US 1928
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
48. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Baker v Carr 1962
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Smith v Allwright 1944
49. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Engel v Vitale 1962
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Buckley v Baleo 1976
50. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Oregon v Elstad 1985
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Weeks v US 1914
Griswold v Connecticut 1965