SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
United States v Lopez 1995
2. Right to privacy
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
3. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Katz v US 1967
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
4. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
Virginia v Black 2002
Kelo v New London 2005
5. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Bush v Gore 2000
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
6. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Furman v Georgia 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
Near v Minnesota 1931
Baker v Carr 1962
7. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US v Nixon 1974
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
8. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Betts v Brady 1942
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
9. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Bush v Gore 2000
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
10. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Weeks v US 1914
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Buckley v Baleo 1976
11. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Barron v Baltimore 1819
12. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
13. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Miranda v Arizona 1966
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
South Dakota v Dole 1987
14. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Engel v Vitale 1962
Virginia v Black 2002
15. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Bush v Gore 2000
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
16. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
17. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
18. Separate but equal for races
Fletcher v Peck 1810
United States v Lopez 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
19. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Bush v Gore 2000
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
20. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Miller v California 1973
US v Eichman 1990
21. Established judicial review
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Bush v Gore 2000
Texas v Johnson 1989
Marbury v Madison 1803
22. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
23. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Furman v Georgia 1972
US v Eichman 1990
United States v Lopez 1995
US v Nixon 1974
24. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Roe v Wade 1973
25. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Marbury v Madison 1803
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
26. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Engel v Vitale 1962
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
27. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
28. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Bush v Gore 2000
Dennis v US 1951
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Roe v Wade 1973
29. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Smith v Allwright 1944
Clinton v New York 1998
30. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Smith v Allwright 1944
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Gitlow v NY 1925
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
31. Established exclusionary rule
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Weeks v US 1914
United States v Lopez 1995
32. Separate is not equal
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katz v US 1967
33. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
34. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Virginia v Black 2002
Smith v Allwright 1944
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
35. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Weeks v US 1914
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
36. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Marbury v Madison 1803
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dennis v US 1951
37. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Virginia v Black 2002
New York Times v US 1971
38. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
39. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
40. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Kelo v New London 2005
41. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
42. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Oregon v Elstad 1985
43. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US v Eichman 1990
Dennis v US 1951
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
44. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Schenck v US 1919
Lawrence v Texas 2003
45. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Near v Minnesota 1931
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
46. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
47. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
48. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
South Dakota v Dole 1987
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Olmstead v US 1928
Schenck v US 1919
49. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Virginia v Black 2002
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Dennis v US 1951
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
50. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Furman v Georgia 1972