SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Powell v Alabama 1932
New York Times v US 1971
2. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Katz v US 1967
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
3. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Texas v Johnson 1989
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
4. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Korematsu v US 1944
Powell v Alabama 1932
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
5. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Clinton v New York 1998
Olmstead v US 1928
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
6. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Bush v Gore 2000
Betts v Brady 1942
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
7. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Betts v Brady 1942
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Schenck v US 1919
8. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Korematsu v US 1944
9. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bush v Gore 2000
Oregon v Elstad 1985
10. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Marbury v Madison 1803
Korematsu v US 1944
11. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Weeks v US 1914
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Fletcher v Peck 1810
South Dakota v Dole 1987
12. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
13. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Nixon 1974
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
14. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Roe v Wade 1973
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
15. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Gregg v Georgia 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
16. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Kelo v New London 2005
Marbury v Madison 1803
United States v Lopez 1995
Smith v Allwright 1944
17. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Dennis v US 1951
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
18. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Schenck v US 1919
19. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Engel v Vitale 1962
20. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gitlow v NY 1925
Roe v Wade 1973
Near v Minnesota 1931
21. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Texas v Johnson 1989
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Weeks v US 1914
Schenck v US 1919
22. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Weeks v US 1914
23. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Near v Minnesota 1931
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
24. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Smith v Allwright 1944
Oregon v Elstad 1985
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
United States v Lopez 1995
25. Established judicial review
Baker v Carr 1962
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Marbury v Madison 1803
26. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Korematsu v US 1944
Miller v California 1973
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
27. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Schenck v US 1919
28. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
29. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dennis v US 1951
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Miller v California 1973
30. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Buckley v Baleo 1976
31. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Lawrence v Texas 2003
New York Times v US 1971
32. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
33. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
New York Times v US 1971
Baker v Carr 1962
34. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Korematsu v US 1944
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Olmstead v US 1928
35. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Powell v Alabama 1932
US v Eichman 1990
36. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
New York Times v US 1971
Olmstead v US 1928
37. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Katz v US 1967
Kelo v New London 2005
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
38. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Powell v Alabama 1932
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
39. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
United States v Lopez 1995
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
40. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Virginia v Black 2002
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
41. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
US v Eichman 1990
42. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Engel v Vitale 1962
Clinton v New York 1998
43. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Baker v Carr 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
United States v Lopez 1995
44. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Korematsu v US 1944
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
45. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Baker v Carr 1962
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
46. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
US v Eichman 1990
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Kelo v New London 2005
Olmstead v US 1928
47. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
48. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Miller v California 1973
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Barron v Baltimore 1819
49. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
US v Eichman 1990
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Buckley v Baleo 1976
50. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Miller v California 1973
New York Times v US 1971
Korematsu v US 1944