SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
2. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Clinton v New York 1998
Mapp v Ohio 1961
3. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Dennis v US 1951
Smith v Allwright 1944
Buckley v Baleo 1976
4. Separate but equal for races
Baker v Carr 1962
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
5. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Gregg v Georgia 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
6. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Roe v Wade 1973
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Engel v Vitale 1962
7. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Buckley v Baleo 1976
8. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
9. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Weeks v US 1914
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Dennis v US 1951
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
10. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
Roe v Wade 1973
11. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
United States v Lopez 1995
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
12. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Baker v Carr 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Texas v Johnson 1989
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
13. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
14. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Marbury v Madison 1803
Texas v Johnson 1989
15. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Kelo v New London 2005
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
16. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
South Dakota v Dole 1987
17. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Katz v US 1967
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lawrence v Texas 2003
18. You can burn the flag
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Texas v Johnson 1989
Roe v Wade 1973
Weeks v US 1914
19. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Korematsu v US 1944
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gitlow v NY 1925
20. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Bush v Gore 2000
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
21. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Roe v Wade 1973
Betts v Brady 1942
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
New York Times v US 1971
22. Separate is not equal
Roe v Wade 1973
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
US v Nixon 1974
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
23. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
24. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Weeks v US 1914
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
25. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Engel v Vitale 1962
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Kelo v New London 2005
Virginia v Black 2002
26. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
27. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
US v Eichman 1990
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
Olmstead v US 1928
28. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Kelo v New London 2005
Furman v Georgia 1972
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
29. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dennis v US 1951
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
30. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Furman v Georgia 1972
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
31. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Oregon v Elstad 1985
32. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US v Eichman 1990
Texas v Johnson 1989
US v Nixon 1974
33. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Oregon v Elstad 1985
34. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Korematsu v US 1944
Roe v Wade 1973
35. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
36. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Clinton v New York 1998
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
37. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
38. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Kelo v New London 2005
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
39. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Dennis v US 1951
Powell v Alabama 1932
Near v Minnesota 1931
40. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
41. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Gitlow v NY 1925
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Furman v Georgia 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
42. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Weeks v US 1914
Dennis v US 1951
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
43. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Miller v California 1973
Schenck v US 1919
United States v Lopez 1995
44. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Miller v California 1973
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
45. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Olmstead v US 1928
46. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
Miranda v Arizona 1966
South Dakota v Dole 1987
47. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Furman v Georgia 1972
Engel v Vitale 1962
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
48. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Oregon v Elstad 1985
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Near v Minnesota 1931
Buckley v Baleo 1976
49. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Schenck v US 1919
50. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Dennis v US 1951
US v Nixon 1974
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Virginia v Black 2002