SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Fletcher v Peck 1810
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
2. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Gitlow v NY 1925
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
3. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Baker v Carr 1962
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
4. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Smith v Allwright 1944
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
5. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
6. You can burn the flag
Katz v US 1967
Dennis v US 1951
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Texas v Johnson 1989
7. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
United States v Lopez 1995
8. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
9. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Kelo v New London 2005
Katz v US 1967
Roe v Wade 1973
10. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Texas v Johnson 1989
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
11. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
12. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
13. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Katz v US 1967
US v Eichman 1990
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
14. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Olmstead v US 1928
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Near v Minnesota 1931
15. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Katz v US 1967
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
16. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gitlow v NY 1925
17. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Buckley v Baleo 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
18. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lawrence v Texas 2003
19. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v US 1971
20. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
21. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Baker v Carr 1962
22. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gregg v Georgia 1976
23. Separate but equal for races
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
24. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Engel v Vitale 1962
Olmstead v US 1928
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
25. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Schenck v US 1919
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Virginia v Black 2002
Gitlow v NY 1925
26. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Olmstead v US 1928
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
27. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Bush v Gore 2000
28. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Near v Minnesota 1931
Smith v Allwright 1944
29. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Oregon v Elstad 1985
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
30. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Bush v Gore 2000
Clinton v New York 1998
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
31. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Bush v Gore 2000
Schenck v US 1919
32. Established judicial review
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Marbury v Madison 1803
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
33. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Korematsu v US 1944
Schenck v US 1919
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
34. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
35. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Furman v Georgia 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Kelo v New London 2005
36. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Olmstead v US 1928
Mapp v Ohio 1961
New York Times v US 1971
Marbury v Madison 1803
37. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Dennis v US 1951
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
38. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Clinton v New York 1998
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
39. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
40. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Near v Minnesota 1931
41. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Miller v California 1973
Olmstead v US 1928
42. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Weeks v US 1914
Betts v Brady 1942
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
43. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Bush v Gore 2000
Olmstead v US 1928
Gitlow v NY 1925
Roe v Wade 1973
44. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Olmstead v US 1928
45. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Weeks v US 1914
South Dakota v Dole 1987
46. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Smith v Allwright 1944
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
47. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
Kelo v New London 2005
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
48. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Marbury v Madison 1803
49. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Furman v Georgia 1972
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
50. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Woodson v North Carolina 1976