SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Near v Minnesota 1931
2. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Roe v Wade 1973
Fletcher v Peck 1810
United States v Lopez 1995
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
3. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
4. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Dennis v US 1951
5. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
6. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Roe v Wade 1973
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Schenck v US 1919
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
7. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
8. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Olmstead v US 1928
Engel v Vitale 1962
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
9. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
10. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Smith v Allwright 1944
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
US v Nixon 1974
11. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Miranda v Arizona 1966
12. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Texas v Johnson 1989
Virginia v Black 2002
Mapp v Ohio 1961
13. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Buckley v Baleo 1976
14. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Engel v Vitale 1962
Kelo v New London 2005
New York Times v US 1971
15. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Dennis v US 1951
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
16. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Baker v Carr 1962
17. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
US v Eichman 1990
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
United States v Lopez 1995
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
18. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Olmstead v US 1928
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
19. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
20. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Clinton v New York 1998
Dennis v US 1951
South Dakota v Dole 1987
21. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Mapp v Ohio 1961
US v Nixon 1974
Texas v Johnson 1989
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
22. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
23. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
United States v Lopez 1995
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Olmstead v US 1928
24. You can burn the flag
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
25. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Lawrence v Texas 2003
26. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
New York Times v US 1971
Gitlow v NY 1925
Korematsu v US 1944
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
27. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Schenck v US 1919
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
28. Separate but equal for races
Texas v Johnson 1989
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
United States v Lopez 1995
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
29. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US v Eichman 1990
30. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Betts v Brady 1942
Powell v Alabama 1932
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
31. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gregg v Georgia 1976
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
32. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
33. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Baker v Carr 1962
Fletcher v Peck 1810
34. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
35. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Near v Minnesota 1931
36. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Dennis v US 1951
New York Times v US 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
37. Separate is not equal
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Near v Minnesota 1931
38. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Clinton v New York 1998
39. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Kelo v New London 2005
US v Eichman 1990
Clinton v New York 1998
40. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
41. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Kelo v New London 2005
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Texas v Johnson 1989
42. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
United States v Lopez 1995
US v Nixon 1974
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Schenck v US 1919
43. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
44. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Bush v Gore 2000
45. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Katz v US 1967
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Korematsu v US 1944
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
46. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Schenck v US 1919
Roe v Wade 1973
47. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Betts v Brady 1942
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
48. Established exclusionary rule
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Weeks v US 1914
Schenck v US 1919
49. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miller v California 1973
50. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Griswold v Connecticut 1965