SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Baker v Carr 1962
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US v Eichman 1990
2. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Dennis v US 1951
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Roe v Wade 1973
3. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Virginia v Black 2002
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
4. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
5. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
6. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
7. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Baker v Carr 1962
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
8. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
9. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Korematsu v US 1944
10. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Virginia v Black 2002
United States v Lopez 1995
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
11. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Mapp v Ohio 1961
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Weeks v US 1914
12. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miller v California 1973
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
13. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Smith v Allwright 1944
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
14. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Clinton v New York 1998
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Marbury v Madison 1803
Furman v Georgia 1972
15. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Near v Minnesota 1931
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Schenck v US 1919
16. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Marbury v Madison 1803
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
17. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
18. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
19. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
20. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Miller v California 1973
Near v Minnesota 1931
21. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Weeks v US 1914
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
22. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
23. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
24. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Furman v Georgia 1972
25. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Clinton v New York 1998
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US v Eichman 1990
26. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Miller v California 1973
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
27. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Miller v California 1973
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
28. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Near v Minnesota 1931
Bush v Gore 2000
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
29. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
30. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
United States v Lopez 1995
New York Times v US 1971
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
31. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Marbury v Madison 1803
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Texas v Johnson 1989
Gregg v Georgia 1976
32. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gitlow v NY 1925
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
33. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Near v Minnesota 1931
US v Eichman 1990
United States v Lopez 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
34. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Schenck v US 1919
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Kelo v New London 2005
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
35. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Powell v Alabama 1932
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Nixon 1974
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
36. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Betts v Brady 1942
Smith v Allwright 1944
Roe v Wade 1973
37. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US v Eichman 1990
Virginia v Black 2002
38. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Schenck v US 1919
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Smith v Allwright 1944
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
39. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Powell v Alabama 1932
40. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
United States v Lopez 1995
New York Times v US 1971
Olmstead v US 1928
41. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Marbury v Madison 1803
United States v Lopez 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
42. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Roe v Wade 1973
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
43. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Baker v Carr 1962
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
44. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Dennis v US 1951
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
45. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Kelo v New London 2005
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
46. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Katz v US 1967
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
47. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Olmstead v US 1928
Miller v California 1973
United States v Lopez 1995
Powell v Alabama 1932
48. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Betts v Brady 1942
Miranda v Arizona 1966
49. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Smith v Allwright 1944
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
50. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Virginia v Black 2002
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Schenck v US 1919
South Dakota v Dole 1987