SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
Furman v Georgia 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
2. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
US v Eichman 1990
United States v Lopez 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
3. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
South Dakota v Dole 1987
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
4. Established exclusionary rule
US v Eichman 1990
Weeks v US 1914
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Buckley v Baleo 1976
5. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Schenck v US 1919
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
6. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
United States v Lopez 1995
New York Times v US 1971
7. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
US v Eichman 1990
Powell v Alabama 1932
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
8. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Near v Minnesota 1931
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Roe v Wade 1973
9. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Near v Minnesota 1931
US v Nixon 1974
Betts v Brady 1942
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
10. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Korematsu v US 1944
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
11. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Miller v California 1973
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
12. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Smith v Allwright 1944
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gitlow v NY 1925
13. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Buckley v Baleo 1976
14. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Near v Minnesota 1931
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
15. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Gitlow v NY 1925
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
16. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Dennis v US 1951
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
17. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Weeks v US 1914
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
18. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Powell v Alabama 1932
Texas v Johnson 1989
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
19. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
New York Times v US 1971
20. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Texas v Johnson 1989
US v Nixon 1974
Gitlow v NY 1925
Marbury v Madison 1803
21. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
22. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Furman v Georgia 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Mapp v Ohio 1961
23. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Gitlow v NY 1925
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Katz v US 1967
24. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US v Nixon 1974
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Fletcher v Peck 1810
25. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
26. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Miller v California 1973
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
27. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
New York Times v US 1971
Engel v Vitale 1962
28. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
29. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Furman v Georgia 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
30. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
31. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
32. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Dennis v US 1951
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miranda v Arizona 1966
33. Established judicial review
US v Eichman 1990
Marbury v Madison 1803
Roe v Wade 1973
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
34. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
35. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
36. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Texas v Johnson 1989
Virginia v Black 2002
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
US v Nixon 1974
37. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Bush v Gore 2000
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Engel v Vitale 1962
38. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Schenck v US 1919
Kelo v New London 2005
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Clinton v New York 1998
39. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
US v Nixon 1974
40. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Marbury v Madison 1803
Engel v Vitale 1962
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
41. Separate but equal for races
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
42. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Furman v Georgia 1972
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Weeks v US 1914
US v Nixon 1974
43. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
New York Times v US 1971
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
44. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Roe v Wade 1973
Schenck v US 1919
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
45. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Baker v Carr 1962
46. Separate is not equal
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
47. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Smith v Allwright 1944
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
New York Times v US 1971
48. Right to privacy
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Furman v Georgia 1972
49. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Fletcher v Peck 1810
50. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Bush v Gore 2000
Virginia v Black 2002
Clinton v New York 1998