SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Smith v Allwright 1944
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
2. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
3. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
4. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Katz v US 1967
Gitlow v NY 1925
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
5. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
6. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Gitlow v NY 1925
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
7. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Roe v Wade 1973
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
8. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Near v Minnesota 1931
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
US v Eichman 1990
Gregg v Georgia 1976
9. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Dennis v US 1951
10. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
11. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Schenck v US 1919
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
12. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
13. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Korematsu v US 1944
14. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Barron v Baltimore 1819
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
15. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Dennis v US 1951
16. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Kelo v New London 2005
17. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Weeks v US 1914
18. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Schenck v US 1919
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
19. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
US v Eichman 1990
Baker v Carr 1962
20. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Korematsu v US 1944
Betts v Brady 1942
Smith v Allwright 1944
21. Established exclusionary rule
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Smith v Allwright 1944
Weeks v US 1914
Marbury v Madison 1803
22. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
23. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Baker v Carr 1962
Engel v Vitale 1962
Miller v California 1973
Powell v Alabama 1932
24. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Kelo v New London 2005
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Bush v Gore 2000
Miller v California 1973
25. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
South Dakota v Dole 1987
26. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Engel v Vitale 1962
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
27. Separate is not equal
Dennis v US 1951
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Smith v Allwright 1944
28. Right to privacy
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Weeks v US 1914
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
29. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US v Nixon 1974
Korematsu v US 1944
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
30. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
United States v Lopez 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
31. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Schenck v US 1919
United States v Lopez 1995
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
32. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
33. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Weeks v US 1914
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
34. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Furman v Georgia 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
35. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Schenck v US 1919
Smith v Allwright 1944
36. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Olmstead v US 1928
Weeks v US 1914
37. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
US v Eichman 1990
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
38. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Miller v California 1973
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
39. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Miller v California 1973
US v Nixon 1974
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
40. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
41. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
US v Nixon 1974
42. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Gitlow v NY 1925
United States v Lopez 1995
US v Eichman 1990
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
43. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Schenck v US 1919
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
44. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Korematsu v US 1944
United States v Lopez 1995
45. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Engel v Vitale 1962
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
46. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Olmstead v US 1928
Baker v Carr 1962
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
47. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US v Eichman 1990
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
48. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
49. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Gitlow v NY 1925
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
50. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Near v Minnesota 1931
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
Clinton v New York 1998