/* */
SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
2. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Korematsu v US 1944
US v Eichman 1990
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
3. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Engel v Vitale 1962
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Lawrence v Texas 2003
United States v Lopez 1995
4. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Bush v Gore 2000
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
5. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
6. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
United States v Lopez 1995
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
7. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
8. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
9. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Bush v Gore 2000
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
10. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Weeks v US 1914
Baker v Carr 1962
11. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
12. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gregg v Georgia 1976
13. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
14. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
United States v Lopez 1995
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
15. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Miller v California 1973
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Furman v Georgia 1972
16. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Olmstead v US 1928
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Near v Minnesota 1931
17. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Dennis v US 1951
Kelo v New London 2005
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US v Eichman 1990
18. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Bush v Gore 2000
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Korematsu v US 1944
19. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
20. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Bush v Gore 2000
New York Times v US 1971
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
21. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Weeks v US 1914
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Gitlow v NY 1925
22. Separate is not equal
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Texas v Johnson 1989
Powell v Alabama 1932
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
23. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
24. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Bush v Gore 2000
Kelo v New London 2005
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
25. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Katz v US 1967
26. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Weeks v US 1914
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
27. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
Gitlow v NY 1925
28. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Smith v Allwright 1944
29. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Powell v Alabama 1932
Furman v Georgia 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Eichman 1990
30. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
US v Eichman 1990
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Kelo v New London 2005
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
31. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Schenck v US 1919
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
32. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Korematsu v US 1944
Bush v Gore 2000
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
33. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gitlow v NY 1925
34. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Kelo v New London 2005
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gitlow v NY 1925
35. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Katz v US 1967
Smith v Allwright 1944
36. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
37. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US v Nixon 1974
Katz v US 1967
Gitlow v NY 1925
38. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Texas v Johnson 1989
39. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Near v Minnesota 1931
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
40. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Kelo v New London 2005
Miller v California 1973
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
41. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Korematsu v US 1944
Engel v Vitale 1962
US v Eichman 1990
42. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Katz v US 1967
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
43. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Weeks v US 1914
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Olmstead v US 1928
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
44. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
United States v Lopez 1995
Schenck v US 1919
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
South Dakota v Dole 1987
45. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
46. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
47. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Bush v Gore 2000
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Virginia v Black 2002
48. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bush v Gore 2000
49. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
United States v Lopez 1995
50. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Schenck v US 1919
United States v Lopez 1995
//
//