SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Powell v Alabama 1932
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
2. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
3. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
4. Established exclusionary rule
US v Eichman 1990
Engel v Vitale 1962
Furman v Georgia 1972
Weeks v US 1914
5. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
United States v Lopez 1995
6. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
7. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Miller v California 1973
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Bush v Gore 2000
8. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Dennis v US 1951
Miller v California 1973
9. Right to privacy
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
10. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
11. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Dennis v US 1951
US v Eichman 1990
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
12. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Powell v Alabama 1932
13. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Near v Minnesota 1931
US v Eichman 1990
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US v Nixon 1974
14. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
15. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Roe v Wade 1973
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lawrence v Texas 2003
16. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
17. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Bush v Gore 2000
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
18. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Olmstead v US 1928
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
19. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Olmstead v US 1928
United States v Lopez 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
20. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
21. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Katz v US 1967
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gitlow v NY 1925
22. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
23. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Dennis v US 1951
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Roe v Wade 1973
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
24. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Baker v Carr 1962
Schenck v US 1919
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
25. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Texas v Johnson 1989
26. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Roe v Wade 1973
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
27. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Oregon v Elstad 1985
28. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
29. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Furman v Georgia 1972
30. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Miranda v Arizona 1966
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
31. Separate is not equal
Kelo v New London 2005
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
US v Nixon 1974
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
32. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Miller v California 1973
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
South Dakota v Dole 1987
33. You can burn the flag
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Miller v California 1973
Texas v Johnson 1989
34. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Gitlow v NY 1925
Furman v Georgia 1972
Smith v Allwright 1944
35. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Bush v Gore 2000
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
36. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
United States v Lopez 1995
37. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Betts v Brady 1942
Virginia v Black 2002
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Marbury v Madison 1803
38. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Furman v Georgia 1972
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
39. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
40. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Marbury v Madison 1803
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Dennis v US 1951
41. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Schenck v US 1919
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Virginia v Black 2002
Oregon v Elstad 1985
42. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Bush v Gore 2000
United States v Lopez 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
43. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
44. Established judicial review
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Marbury v Madison 1803
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Barron v Baltimore 1819
45. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Betts v Brady 1942
Smith v Allwright 1944
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
46. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Weeks v US 1914
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Miller v California 1973
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
47. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
48. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Betts v Brady 1942
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US v Eichman 1990
49. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
New York Times v US 1971
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Betts v Brady 1942
50. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Smith v Allwright 1944
Katz v US 1967