SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
US v Eichman 1990
United States v Lopez 1995
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
2. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Weeks v US 1914
Virginia v Black 2002
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
3. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
4. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Roe v Wade 1973
Korematsu v US 1944
5. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Smith v Allwright 1944
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
6. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Dennis v US 1951
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
Roe v Wade 1973
7. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Smith v Allwright 1944
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
8. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
United States v Lopez 1995
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
9. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Furman v Georgia 1972
10. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Powell v Alabama 1932
11. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
12. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Katz v US 1967
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Smith v Allwright 1944
13. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
14. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Roe v Wade 1973
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Engel v Vitale 1962
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
15. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
16. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Roe v Wade 1973
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
US v Nixon 1974
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
17. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Betts v Brady 1942
18. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
19. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
20. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Baker v Carr 1962
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
21. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
United States v Lopez 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
22. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Dennis v US 1951
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
23. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
24. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Engel v Vitale 1962
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
25. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Katz v US 1967
Smith v Allwright 1944
26. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Weeks v US 1914
Olmstead v US 1928
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gregg v Georgia 1976
27. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
Bush v Gore 2000
28. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
29. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
30. Separate but equal for races
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gitlow v NY 1925
US v Eichman 1990
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
31. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Kelo v New London 2005
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
32. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Engel v Vitale 1962
Powell v Alabama 1932
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
33. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Weeks v US 1914
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Katz v US 1967
Smith v Allwright 1944
34. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
35. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
United States v Lopez 1995
Oregon v Elstad 1985
36. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
37. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Clinton v New York 1998
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
38. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Miller v California 1973
39. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Olmstead v US 1928
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Engel v Vitale 1962
40. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Kelo v New London 2005
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
41. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miller v California 1973
Dennis v US 1951
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
42. You can burn the flag
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Texas v Johnson 1989
Olmstead v US 1928
43. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Furman v Georgia 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Near v Minnesota 1931
44. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Schenck v US 1919
Smith v Allwright 1944
Dennis v US 1951
45. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Barron v Baltimore 1819
US v Nixon 1974
Olmstead v US 1928
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
46. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Miller v California 1973
US v Nixon 1974
47. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
New York Times v US 1971
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lawrence v Texas 2003
48. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Texas v Johnson 1989
Miller v California 1973
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
49. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Roe v Wade 1973
Virginia v Black 2002
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
50. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Smith v Allwright 1944
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests