SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Right to privacy
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
2. You can burn the flag
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
3. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Schenck v US 1919
4. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
Near v Minnesota 1931
Schenck v US 1919
5. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
6. Separate but equal for races
Texas v Johnson 1989
US v Eichman 1990
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
7. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
US v Eichman 1990
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
8. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
9. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Lawrence v Texas 2003
10. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Engel v Vitale 1962
11. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Smith v Allwright 1944
12. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Dennis v US 1951
13. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Olmstead v US 1928
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
14. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Weeks v US 1914
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
15. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Miranda v Arizona 1966
16. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Baker v Carr 1962
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
17. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
US v Eichman 1990
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
18. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Furman v Georgia 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
19. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Betts v Brady 1942
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
20. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
21. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bush v Gore 2000
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
22. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Roe v Wade 1973
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Schenck v US 1919
23. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Baker v Carr 1962
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
24. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Weeks v US 1914
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
25. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gitlow v NY 1925
US v Nixon 1974
26. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Virginia v Black 2002
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
27. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Katz v US 1967
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Bush v Gore 2000
28. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
New York Times v US 1971
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Katz v US 1967
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
29. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Oregon v Elstad 1985
New York Times v US 1971
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
30. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Dennis v US 1951
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
31. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
New York Times v US 1971
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
32. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Baker v Carr 1962
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
33. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Baker v Carr 1962
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Smith v Allwright 1944
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
34. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Schenck v US 1919
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
35. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Betts v Brady 1942
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
United States v Lopez 1995
36. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gitlow v NY 1925
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Furman v Georgia 1972
37. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Baker v Carr 1962
Gitlow v NY 1925
Marbury v Madison 1803
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
38. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Marbury v Madison 1803
Baker v Carr 1962
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
39. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
New York Times v US 1971
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Clinton v New York 1998
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
40. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Powell v Alabama 1932
US v Nixon 1974
41. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
42. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Smith v Allwright 1944
Roe v Wade 1973
Lawrence v Texas 2003
US v Eichman 1990
43. Separate is not equal
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
44. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Schenck v US 1919
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Weeks v US 1914
45. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
46. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gitlow v NY 1925
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
47. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
48. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Virginia v Black 2002
Korematsu v US 1944
Olmstead v US 1928
49. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Weeks v US 1914
United States v Lopez 1995
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
50. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
Engel v Vitale 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819