SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US v Nixon 1974
2. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
3. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
4. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Schenck v US 1919
Clinton v New York 1998
Betts v Brady 1942
5. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
New York Times v US 1971
Texas v Johnson 1989
Baker v Carr 1962
6. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
7. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Roe v Wade 1973
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
8. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Roe v Wade 1973
9. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Korematsu v US 1944
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
10. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Miller v California 1973
Katz v US 1967
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
11. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gitlow v NY 1925
12. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Schenck v US 1919
Furman v Georgia 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Korematsu v US 1944
13. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Furman v Georgia 1972
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
14. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
15. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Roe v Wade 1973
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
16. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Roe v Wade 1973
Bush v Gore 2000
Korematsu v US 1944
17. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dennis v US 1951
18. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
New York Times v US 1971
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
19. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Texas v Johnson 1989
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
20. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Miller v California 1973
Gitlow v NY 1925
21. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Weeks v US 1914
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
South Dakota v Dole 1987
22. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Bush v Gore 2000
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
23. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
US v Eichman 1990
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
24. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Marbury v Madison 1803
Furman v Georgia 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
25. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Kelo v New London 2005
Near v Minnesota 1931
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Mapp v Ohio 1961
26. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gitlow v NY 1925
Virginia v Black 2002
27. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Virginia v Black 2002
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
28. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Schenck v US 1919
Furman v Georgia 1972
29. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lawrence v Texas 2003
30. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Baker v Carr 1962
31. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
32. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gitlow v NY 1925
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Dennis v US 1951
33. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
United States v Lopez 1995
34. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Baker v Carr 1962
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Kelo v New London 2005
35. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
36. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
37. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Miller v California 1973
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dennis v US 1951
38. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Miller v California 1973
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
39. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Miranda v Arizona 1966
40. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Miller v California 1973
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
41. Established exclusionary rule
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Texas v Johnson 1989
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Weeks v US 1914
42. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Betts v Brady 1942
US v Nixon 1974
Gitlow v NY 1925
43. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
44. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Marbury v Madison 1803
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
45. Established judicial review
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Powell v Alabama 1932
Marbury v Madison 1803
46. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Gitlow v NY 1925
Katz v US 1967
Dennis v US 1951
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
47. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
48. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Furman v Georgia 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Olmstead v US 1928
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
49. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
50. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Smith v Allwright 1944
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978