SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
US v Nixon 1974
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bush v Gore 2000
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
2. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Kelo v New London 2005
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Near v Minnesota 1931
3. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Schenck v US 1919
Betts v Brady 1942
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
4. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Korematsu v US 1944
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
5. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Bush v Gore 2000
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Powell v Alabama 1932
6. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
7. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
United States v Lopez 1995
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
8. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
New York Times v US 1971
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dennis v US 1951
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
9. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Clinton v New York 1998
10. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
United States v Lopez 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
11. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
12. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Furman v Georgia 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
Clinton v New York 1998
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
13. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Katz v US 1967
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
14. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
15. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Powell v Alabama 1932
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Schenck v US 1919
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
16. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Roe v Wade 1973
Furman v Georgia 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
17. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
18. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miller v California 1973
19. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Powell v Alabama 1932
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
20. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Barron v Baltimore 1819
21. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
22. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Furman v Georgia 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
23. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Roe v Wade 1973
Katz v US 1967
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Engel v Vitale 1962
24. Established judicial review
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Marbury v Madison 1803
25. Right to privacy
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gregg v Georgia 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
26. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
27. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Miller v California 1973
28. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Smith v Allwright 1944
29. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Katz v US 1967
30. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Roe v Wade 1973
Katz v US 1967
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
31. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Furman v Georgia 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
32. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
US v Nixon 1974
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
33. You can burn the flag
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Roe v Wade 1973
34. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Dennis v US 1951
Powell v Alabama 1932
35. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Powell v Alabama 1932
Smith v Allwright 1944
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
36. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
Baker v Carr 1962
37. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
38. Established exclusionary rule
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Weeks v US 1914
39. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Katz v US 1967
Roe v Wade 1973
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Korematsu v US 1944
40. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
41. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Furman v Georgia 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
42. Separate but equal for races
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
43. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
New York Times v US 1971
Powell v Alabama 1932
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US v Nixon 1974
44. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US v Eichman 1990
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
45. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Texas v Johnson 1989
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
46. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bush v Gore 2000
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
47. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
48. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Marbury v Madison 1803
Clinton v New York 1998
49. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Olmstead v US 1928
Near v Minnesota 1931
Kelo v New London 2005
50. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Baker v Carr 1962
Katz v US 1967
US v Nixon 1974