SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Virginia v Black 2002
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
2. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Katz v US 1967
Dennis v US 1951
Roe v Wade 1973
Baker v Carr 1962
3. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
4. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Clinton v New York 1998
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
5. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
6. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Virginia v Black 2002
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
7. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
8. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
9. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Katz v US 1967
Barron v Baltimore 1819
10. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Clinton v New York 1998
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
11. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
12. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Near v Minnesota 1931
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
13. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Katz v US 1967
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
14. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Oregon v Elstad 1985
15. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
US v Eichman 1990
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Lawrence v Texas 2003
16. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Roe v Wade 1973
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Engel v Vitale 1962
Virginia v Black 2002
17. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Powell v Alabama 1932
Bush v Gore 2000
18. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
19. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Miller v California 1973
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
20. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
New York Times v US 1971
Gitlow v NY 1925
Olmstead v US 1928
Schenck v US 1919
21. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Engel v Vitale 1962
Clinton v New York 1998
22. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Dennis v US 1951
Roe v Wade 1973
Clinton v New York 1998
23. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Lawrence v Texas 2003
24. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
New York Times v US 1971
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Furman v Georgia 1972
25. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Powell v Alabama 1932
US v Eichman 1990
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
26. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Furman v Georgia 1972
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Bush v Gore 2000
Katz v US 1967
27. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Clinton v New York 1998
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
28. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Virginia v Black 2002
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gitlow v NY 1925
Oregon v Elstad 1985
29. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Korematsu v US 1944
30. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Korematsu v US 1944
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
31. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Barron v Baltimore 1819
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Eichman 1990
32. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Gitlow v NY 1925
Virginia v Black 2002
Katz v US 1967
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
33. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Roe v Wade 1973
Gitlow v NY 1925
South Dakota v Dole 1987
34. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US v Nixon 1974
Betts v Brady 1942
Clinton v New York 1998
35. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Weeks v US 1914
36. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Olmstead v US 1928
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
37. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
38. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
39. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Kelo v New London 2005
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Texas v Johnson 1989
40. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Olmstead v US 1928
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
41. Right to privacy
US v Nixon 1974
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Barron v Baltimore 1819
42. Established judicial review
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Marbury v Madison 1803
Clinton v New York 1998
43. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Weeks v US 1914
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
44. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
45. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Marbury v Madison 1803
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Virginia v Black 2002
46. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Korematsu v US 1944
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Dennis v US 1951
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
47. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Dennis v US 1951
Olmstead v US 1928
48. Separate but equal for races
Near v Minnesota 1931
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gregg v Georgia 1976
49. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Smith v Allwright 1944
New York Times v US 1971
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Roe v Wade 1973
50. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
US v Eichman 1990
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978