SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Clinton v New York 1998
Schenck v US 1919
2. Separate but equal for races
Furman v Georgia 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
3. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US v Eichman 1990
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
4. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Weeks v US 1914
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
5. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gitlow v NY 1925
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
6. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
7. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
US v Nixon 1974
Marbury v Madison 1803
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
8. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
9. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
10. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Buckley v Baleo 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
11. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Clinton v New York 1998
12. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
US v Nixon 1974
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Fletcher v Peck 1810
13. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Baker v Carr 1962
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Oregon v Elstad 1985
14. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
Buckley v Baleo 1976
15. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Weeks v US 1914
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
16. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
17. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
18. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Texas v Johnson 1989
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
19. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Gitlow v NY 1925
Buckley v Baleo 1976
20. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Oregon v Elstad 1985
21. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Kelo v New London 2005
22. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Kelo v New London 2005
US v Nixon 1974
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
23. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Miranda v Arizona 1966
24. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Schenck v US 1919
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Miller v California 1973
25. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Smith v Allwright 1944
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Kelo v New London 2005
26. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
United States v Lopez 1995
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Near v Minnesota 1931
27. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Weeks v US 1914
28. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Texas v Johnson 1989
Furman v Georgia 1972
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Korematsu v US 1944
29. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
30. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Betts v Brady 1942
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Powell v Alabama 1932
31. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
United States v Lopez 1995
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Roe v Wade 1973
Miller v California 1973
32. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Olmstead v US 1928
Clinton v New York 1998
Roe v Wade 1973
33. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
34. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Furman v Georgia 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
35. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
Dennis v US 1951
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
36. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Weeks v US 1914
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
37. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Schenck v US 1919
38. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Powell v Alabama 1932
Smith v Allwright 1944
39. You can burn the flag
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Gitlow v NY 1925
40. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
New York Times v US 1971
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Lawrence v Texas 2003
41. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Virginia v Black 2002
Oregon v Elstad 1985
42. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Schenck v US 1919
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
US v Nixon 1974
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
43. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Powell v Alabama 1932
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
44. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Kelo v New London 2005
45. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gitlow v NY 1925
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
46. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Betts v Brady 1942
Fletcher v Peck 1810
47. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Dennis v US 1951
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Kelo v New London 2005
48. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
US v Nixon 1974
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
49. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Clinton v New York 1998
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
50. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
US v Nixon 1974
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Smith v Allwright 1944