SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Betts v Brady 1942
Clinton v New York 1998
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
2. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Miller v California 1973
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
3. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
4. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Fletcher v Peck 1810
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
5. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
6. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dennis v US 1951
Near v Minnesota 1931
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
7. Right to privacy
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Virginia v Black 2002
8. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
9. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
10. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Korematsu v US 1944
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Near v Minnesota 1931
11. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Powell v Alabama 1932
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Betts v Brady 1942
12. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
US v Nixon 1974
Furman v Georgia 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
13. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Powell v Alabama 1932
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Mapp v Ohio 1961
14. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Schenck v US 1919
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
15. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Roe v Wade 1973
Miranda v Arizona 1966
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
16. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Katz v US 1967
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
17. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
United States v Lopez 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Buckley v Baleo 1976
18. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Clinton v New York 1998
US v Nixon 1974
Schenck v US 1919
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
19. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Schenck v US 1919
New York Times v US 1971
Smith v Allwright 1944
20. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
21. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Clinton v New York 1998
Near v Minnesota 1931
22. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miranda v Arizona 1966
US v Nixon 1974
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
23. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Baker v Carr 1962
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Smith v Allwright 1944
24. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Roe v Wade 1973
Virginia v Black 2002
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Lawrence v Texas 2003
25. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
26. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
27. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
28. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Gitlow v NY 1925
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
29. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Miller v California 1973
Roe v Wade 1973
30. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Weeks v US 1914
US v Nixon 1974
Kelo v New London 2005
US v Eichman 1990
31. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
32. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
33. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Kelo v New London 2005
Marbury v Madison 1803
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Dennis v US 1951
34. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
US v Eichman 1990
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Baker v Carr 1962
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
35. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Oregon v Elstad 1985
36. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
Bush v Gore 2000
37. Separate but equal for races
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
38. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Marbury v Madison 1803
39. Established judicial review
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Marbury v Madison 1803
Dennis v US 1951
40. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Dennis v US 1951
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
41. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Kelo v New London 2005
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
42. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
US v Eichman 1990
43. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gitlow v NY 1925
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Katz v US 1967
44. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
New York Times v US 1971
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
45. You can burn the flag
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Katz v US 1967
Texas v Johnson 1989
46. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
US v Nixon 1974
47. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Furman v Georgia 1972
48. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Barron v Baltimore 1819
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Baker v Carr 1962
Dennis v US 1951
49. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Weeks v US 1914
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US v Nixon 1974
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
50. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Texas v Johnson 1989
New York Times v US 1971
Kelo v New London 2005