SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Separate is not equal
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
2. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US v Eichman 1990
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
3. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Near v Minnesota 1931
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Nixon 1974
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
4. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Korematsu v US 1944
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
5. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Weeks v US 1914
Near v Minnesota 1931
6. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Smith v Allwright 1944
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Roe v Wade 1973
Barron v Baltimore 1819
7. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Katz v US 1967
Furman v Georgia 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Clinton v New York 1998
8. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Kelo v New London 2005
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
9. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Clinton v New York 1998
Betts v Brady 1942
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Miller v California 1973
10. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
11. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
12. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
New York Times v US 1971
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
13. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Olmstead v US 1928
14. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Smith v Allwright 1944
Olmstead v US 1928
US v Nixon 1974
15. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
16. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Virginia v Black 2002
17. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Baker v Carr 1962
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
18. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
New York Times v US 1971
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
19. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
20. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Katz v US 1967
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
21. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Marbury v Madison 1803
Smith v Allwright 1944
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
22. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Texas v Johnson 1989
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
Buckley v Baleo 1976
23. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
New York Times v US 1971
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Katz v US 1967
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
24. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US 1971
United States v Lopez 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
Oregon v Elstad 1985
25. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Buckley v Baleo 1976
26. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
27. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Korematsu v US 1944
Dennis v US 1951
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
28. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Korematsu v US 1944
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Weeks v US 1914
Betts v Brady 1942
29. You can burn the flag
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Texas v Johnson 1989
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
30. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Dennis v US 1951
Powell v Alabama 1932
31. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Bush v Gore 2000
United States v Lopez 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
Baker v Carr 1962
32. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US v Nixon 1974
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Baker v Carr 1962
33. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Powell v Alabama 1932
Baker v Carr 1962
34. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Texas v Johnson 1989
35. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Furman v Georgia 1972
Schenck v US 1919
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Roe v Wade 1973
36. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Kelo v New London 2005
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
37. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Betts v Brady 1942
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
38. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
South Dakota v Dole 1987
39. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Weeks v US 1914
Near v Minnesota 1931
Bush v Gore 2000
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
40. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Clinton v New York 1998
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
US v Eichman 1990
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
41. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
42. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Kelo v New London 2005
Near v Minnesota 1931
Roe v Wade 1973
Miranda v Arizona 1966
43. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
US v Nixon 1974
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
44. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Betts v Brady 1942
Furman v Georgia 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
Miranda v Arizona 1966
45. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
46. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
47. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Virginia v Black 2002
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
48. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Korematsu v US 1944
Gitlow v NY 1925
Kelo v New London 2005
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
49. Established judicial review
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Korematsu v US 1944
Marbury v Madison 1803
Betts v Brady 1942
50. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Powell v Alabama 1932
Bush v Gore 2000