SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Miranda v Arizona 1966
2. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Dennis v US 1951
Miller v California 1973
Engel v Vitale 1962
3. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Gitlow v NY 1925
Furman v Georgia 1972
4. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Barron v Baltimore 1819
5. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Weeks v US 1914
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Engel v Vitale 1962
6. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Baker v Carr 1962
7. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Katz v US 1967
8. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
South Dakota v Dole 1987
9. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
10. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Dennis v US 1951
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
11. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Betts v Brady 1942
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
New York Times v US 1971
12. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Miller v California 1973
South Dakota v Dole 1987
13. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Fletcher v Peck 1810
14. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Furman v Georgia 1972
15. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
16. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
17. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dennis v US 1951
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
18. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Roe v Wade 1973
19. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Buckley v Baleo 1976
20. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Buckley v Baleo 1976
21. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Mapp v Ohio 1961
22. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Gitlow v NY 1925
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
23. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Marbury v Madison 1803
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
24. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Clinton v New York 1998
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
25. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Near v Minnesota 1931
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Texas v Johnson 1989
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
26. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Kelo v New London 2005
Engel v Vitale 1962
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
27. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Virginia v Black 2002
Katz v US 1967
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Barron v Baltimore 1819
28. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Virginia v Black 2002
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
29. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Smith v Allwright 1944
30. You can burn the flag
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Texas v Johnson 1989
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
31. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Smith v Allwright 1944
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
32. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
33. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
34. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Miranda v Arizona 1966
35. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Betts v Brady 1942
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
36. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Engel v Vitale 1962
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
37. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Betts v Brady 1942
Schenck v US 1919
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Fletcher v Peck 1810
38. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Near v Minnesota 1931
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
39. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Weeks v US 1914
Gregg v Georgia 1976
40. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Bush v Gore 2000
US v Eichman 1990
Schenck v US 1919
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
41. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
42. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Engel v Vitale 1962
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
43. Established exclusionary rule
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Weeks v US 1914
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
44. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Dennis v US 1951
Near v Minnesota 1931
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
45. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Clinton v New York 1998
46. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Powell v Alabama 1932
47. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Virginia v Black 2002
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
48. Separate is not equal
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Roe v Wade 1973
49. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
New York Times v US 1971
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Powell v Alabama 1932
50. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969