SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Betts v Brady 1942
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
2. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Betts v Brady 1942
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
3. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Smith v Allwright 1944
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Fletcher v Peck 1810
4. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
5. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Katz v US 1967
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
6. Separate is not equal
New York Times v US 1971
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
7. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US v Eichman 1990
8. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Barron v Baltimore 1819
9. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
10. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
11. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Powell v Alabama 1932
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
12. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Katz v US 1967
Buckley v Baleo 1976
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
13. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Bush v Gore 2000
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
14. Established exclusionary rule
New York Times v US 1971
Roe v Wade 1973
Weeks v US 1914
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
15. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Baker v Carr 1962
Smith v Allwright 1944
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
16. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Bush v Gore 2000
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
17. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Clinton v New York 1998
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Barron v Baltimore 1819
18. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
19. Separate but equal for races
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Fletcher v Peck 1810
20. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
US v Eichman 1990
Clinton v New York 1998
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Virginia v Black 2002
21. Right to privacy
Dennis v US 1951
Olmstead v US 1928
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
22. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
South Dakota v Dole 1987
23. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Betts v Brady 1942
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
24. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Engel v Vitale 1962
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Oregon v Elstad 1985
25. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
26. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Furman v Georgia 1972
27. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US v Nixon 1974
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
28. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Schenck v US 1919
New York Times v US 1971
29. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miller v California 1973
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Dennis v US 1951
30. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Fletcher v Peck 1810
31. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Clinton v New York 1998
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
32. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Marbury v Madison 1803
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Engel v Vitale 1962
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
33. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
New York Times v US 1971
Roe v Wade 1973
South Dakota v Dole 1987
34. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Engel v Vitale 1962
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
35. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Bush v Gore 2000
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
36. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Smith v Allwright 1944
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
37. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Furman v Georgia 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
United States v Lopez 1995
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
38. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Katz v US 1967
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
39. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Kelo v New London 2005
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
40. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Betts v Brady 1942
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
41. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Dennis v US 1951
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
42. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US v Eichman 1990
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
43. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Baker v Carr 1962
Katz v US 1967
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
44. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
US v Eichman 1990
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
45. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Miranda v Arizona 1966
46. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
US v Nixon 1974
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Olmstead v US 1928
47. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Weeks v US 1914
Powell v Alabama 1932
Bush v Gore 2000
48. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Powell v Alabama 1932
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
49. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Roe v Wade 1973
New York Times v US 1971
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
50. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Olmstead v US 1928
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003