SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Powell v Alabama 1932
Texas v Johnson 1989
Smith v Allwright 1944
2. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Virginia v Black 2002
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
3. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
US v Eichman 1990
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Near v Minnesota 1931
Oregon v Elstad 1985
4. You can burn the flag
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Texas v Johnson 1989
5. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Gitlow v NY 1925
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
6. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Clinton v New York 1998
7. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Gitlow v NY 1925
Olmstead v US 1928
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
8. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
United States v Lopez 1995
Korematsu v US 1944
9. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katz v US 1967
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
10. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Engel v Vitale 1962
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
11. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Smith v Allwright 1944
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
12. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Korematsu v US 1944
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
13. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Miller v California 1973
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Marbury v Madison 1803
Smith v Allwright 1944
14. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US v Eichman 1990
Dennis v US 1951
Bush v Gore 2000
15. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gitlow v NY 1925
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
16. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Weeks v US 1914
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Virginia v Black 2002
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
17. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
18. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Baker v Carr 1962
Schenck v US 1919
19. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Betts v Brady 1942
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Baker v Carr 1962
20. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Smith v Allwright 1944
21. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
New York Times v US 1971
Roe v Wade 1973
22. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Clinton v New York 1998
23. Established judicial review
Marbury v Madison 1803
Powell v Alabama 1932
Gitlow v NY 1925
US v Eichman 1990
24. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Betts v Brady 1942
Mapp v Ohio 1961
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Kelo v New London 2005
25. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Olmstead v US 1928
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
26. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
27. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Furman v Georgia 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US v Eichman 1990
28. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
US v Nixon 1974
Gitlow v NY 1925
New York Times v US 1971
29. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Kelo v New London 2005
Olmstead v US 1928
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US v Nixon 1974
30. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
31. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Bush v Gore 2000
Weeks v US 1914
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
32. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
33. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Bush v Gore 2000
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US v Nixon 1974
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
34. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US v Eichman 1990
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
35. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Virginia v Black 2002
Katz v US 1967
36. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gitlow v NY 1925
37. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
38. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
39. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Weeks v US 1914
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
40. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Korematsu v US 1944
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Near v Minnesota 1931
Weeks v US 1914
41. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Korematsu v US 1944
42. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Smith v Allwright 1944
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
43. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
New York Times v US 1971
44. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Bush v Gore 2000
Gregg v Georgia 1976
45. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Olmstead v US 1928
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
46. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Betts v Brady 1942
Weeks v US 1914
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
47. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Schenck v US 1919
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
48. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Engel v Vitale 1962
United States v Lopez 1995
Schenck v US 1919
Lawrence v Texas 2003
49. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
50. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Kelo v New London 2005
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gibbons v Ogden 1824