SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
New York Times v US 1971
Kelo v New London 2005
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
2. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
United States v Lopez 1995
3. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Oregon v Elstad 1985
4. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Fletcher v Peck 1810
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
5. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Gregg v Georgia 1976
6. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Furman v Georgia 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
7. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Texas v Johnson 1989
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
8. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Mapp v Ohio 1961
9. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
10. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Near v Minnesota 1931
Dennis v US 1951
US v Eichman 1990
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
11. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Betts v Brady 1942
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Marbury v Madison 1803
12. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Virginia v Black 2002
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
13. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Virginia v Black 2002
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
14. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
15. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Marbury v Madison 1803
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
16. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
17. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Betts v Brady 1942
United States v Lopez 1995
Katz v US 1967
18. Separate is not equal
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Virginia v Black 2002
19. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
20. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US v Eichman 1990
Powell v Alabama 1932
21. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Near v Minnesota 1931
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
22. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gitlow v NY 1925
Roe v Wade 1973
23. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Roe v Wade 1973
Schenck v US 1919
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
24. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Near v Minnesota 1931
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Betts v Brady 1942
25. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Roe v Wade 1973
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Baker v Carr 1962
26. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Weeks v US 1914
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Betts v Brady 1942
27. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Smith v Allwright 1944
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
28. Established exclusionary rule
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Weeks v US 1914
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
29. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Marbury v Madison 1803
30. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Baker v Carr 1962
Korematsu v US 1944
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Miller v California 1973
31. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Furman v Georgia 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
32. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Olmstead v US 1928
US v Nixon 1974
33. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Weeks v US 1914
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
34. You can burn the flag
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Texas v Johnson 1989
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
35. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Smith v Allwright 1944
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
36. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Dennis v US 1951
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Miranda v Arizona 1966
37. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Texas v Johnson 1989
Fletcher v Peck 1810
38. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
39. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Schenck v US 1919
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Miller v California 1973
40. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Betts v Brady 1942
Katz v US 1967
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
41. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Powell v Alabama 1932
Buckley v Baleo 1976
42. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Buckley v Baleo 1976
New York Times v US 1971
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
43. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
44. Separate but equal for races
US v Nixon 1974
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
45. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
46. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
New York Times v US 1971
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
47. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
New York Times v US 1971
48. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Miller v California 1973
49. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Powell v Alabama 1932
Roe v Wade 1973
US v Nixon 1974
Betts v Brady 1942
50. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Fletcher v Peck 1810