SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
2. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
US v Nixon 1974
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
3. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
4. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
5. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
6. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
7. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
8. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
9. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Smith v Allwright 1944
Korematsu v US 1944
10. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Engel v Vitale 1962
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
11. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
12. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Korematsu v US 1944
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Clinton v New York 1998
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
13. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Powell v Alabama 1932
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
14. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Weeks v US 1914
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Betts v Brady 1942
15. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Schenck v US 1919
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Bush v Gore 2000
16. Separate but equal for races
Near v Minnesota 1931
United States v Lopez 1995
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
17. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
18. Established exclusionary rule
Engel v Vitale 1962
Katz v US 1967
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Weeks v US 1914
19. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gitlow v NY 1925
20. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Miller v California 1973
US v Nixon 1974
21. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Virginia v Black 2002
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
22. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Weeks v US 1914
23. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Katz v US 1967
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Roe v Wade 1973
24. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
US v Eichman 1990
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
25. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Dennis v US 1951
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
26. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Gitlow v NY 1925
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Schenck v US 1919
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
27. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Roe v Wade 1973
28. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Roe v Wade 1973
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
29. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Korematsu v US 1944
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
30. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Miller v California 1973
United States v Lopez 1995
31. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Nixon 1974
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
32. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Miller v California 1973
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Engel v Vitale 1962
33. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Clinton v New York 1998
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
34. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
35. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
US v Nixon 1974
Olmstead v US 1928
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
36. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Furman v Georgia 1972
Virginia v Black 2002
37. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
United States v Lopez 1995
Near v Minnesota 1931
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Engel v Vitale 1962
38. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Kelo v New London 2005
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
39. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Weeks v US 1914
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Bush v Gore 2000
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
40. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Schenck v US 1919
Olmstead v US 1928
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
41. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Miller v California 1973
42. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Near v Minnesota 1931
43. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Gregg v Georgia 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
Schenck v US 1919
44. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Katz v US 1967
New York Times v US 1971
Weeks v US 1914
Betts v Brady 1942
45. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Olmstead v US 1928
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Fletcher v Peck 1810
United States v Lopez 1995
46. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Kelo v New London 2005
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Marbury v Madison 1803
47. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Dennis v US 1951
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
48. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Marbury v Madison 1803
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
49. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Betts v Brady 1942
Weeks v US 1914
Dennis v US 1951
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
50. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Texas v Johnson 1989
New York Times v US 1971
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992