SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Weeks v US 1914
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
2. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Furman v Georgia 1972
3. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
United States v Lopez 1995
Virginia v Black 2002
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
4. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
5. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Buckley v Baleo 1976
6. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
7. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Smith v Allwright 1944
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Dennis v US 1951
8. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Mapp v Ohio 1961
9. Established exclusionary rule
Korematsu v US 1944
Powell v Alabama 1932
Weeks v US 1914
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
10. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US v Eichman 1990
Baker v Carr 1962
11. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Virginia v Black 2002
Korematsu v US 1944
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
12. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Katz v US 1967
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
13. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Barron v Baltimore 1819
US v Eichman 1990
Baker v Carr 1962
14. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Gitlow v NY 1925
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Olmstead v US 1928
15. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
16. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Korematsu v US 1944
17. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Kelo v New London 2005
Katz v US 1967
18. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Schenck v US 1919
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
19. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
US v Nixon 1974
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
20. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Furman v Georgia 1972
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
21. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
22. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Schenck v US 1919
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
23. Established judicial review
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Marbury v Madison 1803
Kelo v New London 2005
24. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
United States v Lopez 1995
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Smith v Allwright 1944
25. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Schenck v US 1919
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
26. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Miller v California 1973
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Virginia v Black 2002
27. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
28. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
29. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Baker v Carr 1962
Near v Minnesota 1931
Weeks v US 1914
30. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Virginia v Black 2002
Engel v Vitale 1962
31. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Buckley v Baleo 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Roe v Wade 1973
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
32. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Weeks v US 1914
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
33. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Olmstead v US 1928
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Gitlow v NY 1925
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
34. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Katz v US 1967
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
35. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Schenck v US 1919
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
36. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Near v Minnesota 1931
Weeks v US 1914
37. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Schenck v US 1919
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miller v California 1973
Miranda v Arizona 1966
38. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Dennis v US 1951
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
39. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Gitlow v NY 1925
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
40. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Clinton v New York 1998
Korematsu v US 1944
New York Times v US 1971
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
41. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Miller v California 1973
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
42. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Olmstead v US 1928
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Clinton v New York 1998
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
43. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Smith v Allwright 1944
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
44. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Near v Minnesota 1931
Kelo v New London 2005
Powell v Alabama 1932
Miranda v Arizona 1966
45. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
46. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Miranda v Arizona 1966
South Dakota v Dole 1987
US v Eichman 1990
United States v Lopez 1995
47. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
United States v Lopez 1995
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
48. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Dennis v US 1951
US v Nixon 1974
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
49. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Furman v Georgia 1972
50. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests