SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Dennis v US 1951
Baker v Carr 1962
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Near v Minnesota 1931
2. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
US v Nixon 1974
Texas v Johnson 1989
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
3. Separate is not equal
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
4. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Near v Minnesota 1931
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Betts v Brady 1942
Bush v Gore 2000
5. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Smith v Allwright 1944
Virginia v Black 2002
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
6. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Furman v Georgia 1972
United States v Lopez 1995
Korematsu v US 1944
7. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
8. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Olmstead v US 1928
9. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Dennis v US 1951
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Engel v Vitale 1962
10. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Smith v Allwright 1944
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Kelo v New London 2005
11. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Texas v Johnson 1989
Katz v US 1967
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Buckley v Baleo 1976
12. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Schenck v US 1919
Marbury v Madison 1803
13. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Baker v Carr 1962
Texas v Johnson 1989
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
14. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Schenck v US 1919
Baker v Carr 1962
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
15. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
16. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Kelo v New London 2005
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
17. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
18. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
US v Eichman 1990
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Bush v Gore 2000
19. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Clinton v New York 1998
Kelo v New London 2005
20. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Clinton v New York 1998
21. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Roe v Wade 1973
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
22. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Betts v Brady 1942
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Baker v Carr 1962
Buckley v Baleo 1976
23. Established exclusionary rule
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Weeks v US 1914
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
24. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
25. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Buckley v Baleo 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
US v Nixon 1974
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
26. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Smith v Allwright 1944
Near v Minnesota 1931
Betts v Brady 1942
27. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
New York Times v US 1971
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Roe v Wade 1973
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
28. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Schenck v US 1919
Marbury v Madison 1803
Near v Minnesota 1931
Powell v Alabama 1932
29. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Schenck v US 1919
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
30. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Marbury v Madison 1803
31. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
32. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
33. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Virginia v Black 2002
Roe v Wade 1973
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Katz v US 1967
34. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
US v Nixon 1974
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Near v Minnesota 1931
35. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Marbury v Madison 1803
Powell v Alabama 1932
Buckley v Baleo 1976
36. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Olmstead v US 1928
Engel v Vitale 1962
Barron v Baltimore 1819
US v Nixon 1974
37. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Kelo v New London 2005
Gitlow v NY 1925
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
38. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US v Nixon 1974
39. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Powell v Alabama 1932
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Buckley v Baleo 1976
40. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Near v Minnesota 1931
Powell v Alabama 1932
Clinton v New York 1998
Barron v Baltimore 1819
41. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Marbury v Madison 1803
Furman v Georgia 1972
New York Times v US 1971
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
42. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Katz v US 1967
43. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Gitlow v NY 1925
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
44. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Powell v Alabama 1932
Kelo v New London 2005
45. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Gitlow v NY 1925
46. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
47. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Engel v Vitale 1962
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
48. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
49. Right to privacy
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
50. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
US v Eichman 1990
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978