SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
2. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Baker v Carr 1962
Korematsu v US 1944
Dennis v US 1951
Gregg v Georgia 1976
3. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Texas v Johnson 1989
Furman v Georgia 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
4. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
5. Right to privacy
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Marbury v Madison 1803
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
6. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
7. Established national abortion guidelines by extending inferred right of privacy from Griswold
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Kelo v New London 2005
Schenck v US 1919
Roe v Wade 1973
8. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
New York Times v US 1971
9. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Miller v California 1973
Schenck v US 1919
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
10. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Betts v Brady 1942
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
US v Nixon 1974
11. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Gitlow v NY 1925
12. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Bush v Gore 2000
Betts v Brady 1942
13. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Kelo v New London 2005
Miller v California 1973
14. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Olmstead v US 1928
15. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
United States v Lopez 1995
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
16. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
New York Times v US 1971
Gitlow v NY 1925
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
17. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Baker v Carr 1962
Schenck v US 1919
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
18. Established exclusionary rule
Weeks v US 1914
Furman v Georgia 1972
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
19. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Powell v Alabama 1932
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
20. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Furman v Georgia 1972
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
21. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Roe v Wade 1973
Kelo v New London 2005
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
22. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
Smith v Allwright 1944
New York Times v US 1971
South Dakota v Dole 1987
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
23. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
24. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Mapp v Ohio 1961
25. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Roe v Wade 1973
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Buckley v Baleo 1976
26. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Virginia v Black 2002
Olmstead v US 1928
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
27. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
28. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Dennis v US 1951
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Texas v Johnson 1989
29. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Gitlow v NY 1925
Virginia v Black 2002
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
30. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Katz v US 1967
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
31. Established judicial review
Kelo v New London 2005
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Furman v Georgia 1972
Marbury v Madison 1803
32. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Near v Minnesota 1931
Gitlow v NY 1925
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
33. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
34. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
35. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Betts v Brady 1942
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
36. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Smith v Allwright 1944
Clinton v New York 1998
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
37. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
United States v Lopez 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Marbury v Madison 1803
38. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Dennis v US 1951
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
39. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Olmstead v US 1928
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
40. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Engel v Vitale 1962
United States v Lopez 1995
41. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Bush v Gore 2000
Furman v Georgia 1972
42. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Texas v Johnson 1989
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
43. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Gitlow v NY 1925
Furman v Georgia 1972
44. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Schenck v US 1919
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
45. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Texas v Johnson 1989
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
46. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Furman v Georgia 1972
Katz v US 1967
Baker v Carr 1962
47. You can burn the flag
Weeks v US 1914
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
48. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Fletcher v Peck 1810
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Roe v Wade 1973
Gregg v Georgia 1976
49. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Gitlow v NY 1925
Virginia v Black 2002
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
50. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
New York Times v Sullivan 1964