SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Barron v Baltimore 1819
2. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Bush v Gore 2000
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Engel v Vitale 1962
3. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Dennis v US 1951
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
4. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Weeks v US 1914
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
5. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
US v Nixon 1974
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
6. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bush v Gore 2000
Baker v Carr 1962
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
7. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Powell v Alabama 1932
Weeks v US 1914
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
8. Established exclusionary rule
Furman v Georgia 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Weeks v US 1914
9. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Marbury v Madison 1803
Schenck v US 1919
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Miller v California 1973
10. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
US v Nixon 1974
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
11. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
New York Times v US 1971
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Gregg v Georgia 1976
12. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Near v Minnesota 1931
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Gregg v Georgia 1976
13. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Dennis v US 1951
Weeks v US 1914
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
14. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Virginia v Black 2002
US v Eichman 1990
15. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Smith v Allwright 1944
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
16. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
US v Eichman 1990
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Fletcher v Peck 1810
17. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Miller v California 1973
18. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Near v Minnesota 1931
19. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
20. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Gitlow v NY 1925
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
21. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Engel v Vitale 1962
Olmstead v US 1928
22. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
US v Nixon 1974
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Marbury v Madison 1803
23. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Buckley v Baleo 1976
24. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Furman v Georgia 1972
25. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
26. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
27. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
28. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Mapp v Ohio 1961
29. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Clinton v New York 1998
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Katz v US 1967
30. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Furman v Georgia 1972
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Virginia v Black 2002
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
31. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
32. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Lawrence v Texas 2003
33. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Betts v Brady 1942
Roe v Wade 1973
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Near v Minnesota 1931
34. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Korematsu v US 1944
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Smith v Allwright 1944
35. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Gitlow v NY 1925
Furman v Georgia 1972
Bush v Gore 2000
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
36. Right to privacy
Miller v California 1973
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Clinton v New York 1998
37. You can burn the flag
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
38. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
United States v Lopez 1995
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
39. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Miller v California 1973
40. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Bush v Gore 2000
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
41. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Korematsu v US 1944
Dennis v US 1951
42. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
43. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Katz v US 1967
US v Eichman 1990
44. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
New York Times v US 1971
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
45. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Smith v Allwright 1944
46. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Miranda v Arizona 1966
47. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
48. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Dennis v US 1951
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
49. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Betts v Brady 1942
Weeks v US 1914
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
50. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Dennis v US 1951
Schenck v US 1919
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests