SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Kelo v New London 2005
New York Times v US 1971
Olmstead v US 1928
2. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Olmstead v US 1928
3. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
4. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Baker v Carr 1962
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
5. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
6. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Katz v US 1967
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Texas v Johnson 1989
7. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
8. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Katz v US 1967
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
9. You can burn the flag
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Texas v Johnson 1989
Powell v Alabama 1932
Furman v Georgia 1972
10. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Texas v Johnson 1989
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
11. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Smith v Allwright 1944
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
United States v Lopez 1995
12. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Dennis v US 1951
US v Eichman 1990
Mapp v Ohio 1961
13. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bush v Gore 2000
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
14. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Virginia v Black 2002
Engel v Vitale 1962
Baker v Carr 1962
15. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Clinton v New York 1998
Furman v Georgia 1972
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Marbury v Madison 1803
16. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
17. Established judicial review
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Marbury v Madison 1803
Dennis v US 1951
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
18. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Miller v California 1973
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Fletcher v Peck 1810
19. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Katz v US 1967
Olmstead v US 1928
20. Prohibited states from banning teaching of evolution in public schools
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Smith v Allwright 1944
21. NC makes mandatory punishment for certain crimes - deemed unconstitutional
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
22. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
23. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Furman v Georgia 1972
Dennis v US 1951
Near v Minnesota 1931
Kelo v New London 2005
24. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Dennis v US 1951
Marbury v Madison 1803
Schenck v US 1919
Korematsu v US 1944
25. Federal wiretaps of phone conversation is constitutional
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Olmstead v US 1928
Engel v Vitale 1962
26. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Engel v Vitale 1962
Buckley v Baleo 1976
US v Eichman 1990
Powell v Alabama 1932
27. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Near v Minnesota 1931
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Mapp v Ohio 1961
28. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Virginia v Black 2002
New York Times v US 1971
Gitlow v NY 1925
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
29. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Clinton v New York 1998
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Weeks v US 1914
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
30. Helped states to engage in eminent domain - said that fifth amendment right to take private property for public use is legal for states without eminent domain
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
31. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Smith v Allwright 1944
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
32. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Smith v Allwright 1944
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Baker v Carr 1962
Dennis v US 1951
33. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
New York Times v US 1971
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
34. Invalidated 1989 Flag Protection Act
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
US v Eichman 1990
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
35. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Furman v Georgia 1972
Miller v California 1973
Gitlow v NY 1925
36. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Texas v Johnson 1989
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
37. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Dennis v US 1951
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
38. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Gitlow v NY 1925
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
39. Separate is not equal
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Kelo v New London 2005
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
40. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Marbury v Madison 1803
Powell v Alabama 1932
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
41. Separate but equal for races
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
42. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Smith v Allwright 1944
Miller v California 1973
43. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
US v Nixon 1974
United States v Lopez 1995
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Virginia v Black 2002
44. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Weeks v US 1914
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Betts v Brady 1942
45. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Smith v Allwright 1944
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
46. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
US v Nixon 1974
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
47. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Smith v Allwright 1944
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
48. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
49. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Schenck v US 1919
50. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Barron v Baltimore 1819
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Virginia v Black 2002
Fletcher v Peck 1810