SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Gitlow v NY 1925
Clinton v New York 1998
United States v Lopez 1995
Olmstead v US 1928
2. Race-based affirmative action was permissible so long as it was in the service of creating greater diversity
Baker v Carr 1962
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
3. States did not have power to tax the national bank - reinforces supremacy clause
Gregg v Georgia 1976
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
US v Nixon 1974
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
4. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
US v Nixon 1974
Baker v Carr 1962
Virginia v Black 2002
5. Citizens of Japanese descent could be interned and deprived of basic constitutional rights due to executive order
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
6. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
US v Eichman 1990
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Olmstead v US 1928
7. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
8. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Baker v Carr 1962
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
9. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Engel v Vitale 1962
Near v Minnesota 1931
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
10. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY 1925
Roe v Wade 1973
Smith v Allwright 1944
US v Eichman 1990
11. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Clinton v New York 1998
Miller v California 1973
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
12. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
US v Eichman 1990
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Fletcher v Peck 1810
13. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Kelo v New London 2005
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
14. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Weeks v US 1914
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
15. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Texas v Johnson 1989
16. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
17. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
18. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action
Weeks v US 1914
US v Nixon 1974
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Mapp v Ohio 1961
19. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Engel v Vitale 1962
Furman v Georgia 1972
Betts v Brady 1942
20. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Virginia v Black 2002
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
21. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Schenck v US 1919
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Kelo v New London 2005
22. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Powell v Alabama 1932
23. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
24. You can burn the flag
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Clinton v New York 1998
Texas v Johnson 1989
25. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
US v Eichman 1990
Virginia v Black 2002
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Dennis v US 1951
26. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Clinton v New York 1998
Engel v Vitale 1962
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
27. Forbids state-mandated bible reading
Weeks v US 1914
Buckley v Baleo 1976
New York Times v US 1971
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
28. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Texas v Johnson 1989
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katz v US 1967
29. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
30. Demonstrations near schools that disrupted classes could be legally banned
Roe v Wade 1973
US v Eichman 1990
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
31. Established exclusionary rule
United States v Lopez 1995
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Weeks v US 1914
32. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Kelo v New London 2005
33. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Furman v Georgia 1972
34. Right to privacy
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
35. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Miller v California 1973
Gitlow v NY 1925
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
36. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
US v Eichman 1990
Gregg v Georgia 1976
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
37. State govs must provide counsel in cases involving the death penalty to those who can't afford it
Powell v Alabama 1932
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Olmstead v US 1928
38. Race cannot be sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative district boundaries (1982 VRA wants them to do that - though)
Roe v Wade 1973
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Katz v US 1967
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
39. Established judicial review
Virginia v Black 2002
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Marbury v Madison 1803
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
40. Cross burning = 'fighting words' = unconstitutional
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Virginia v Black 2002
Engel v Vitale 1962
41. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
US v Eichman 1990
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Bush v Gore 2000
US v Nixon 1974
42. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Bush v Gore 2000
US v Nixon 1974
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
43. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Weeks v US 1914
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Smith v Allwright 1944
Powell v Alabama 1932
44. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
United States v Lopez 1995
Schenck v US 1919
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
45. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Olmstead v US 1928
46. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
New York Times v US 1971
Barron v Baltimore 1819
47. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Near v Minnesota 1931
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
48. Segregate with al 'due and deliberate speed'
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Bush v Gore 2000
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
49. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Schenck v US 1919
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Kelo v New London 2005
50. States can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose an 'undue burden' on women
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Olmstead v US 1928
Roe v Wade 1973