SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. All state governments must provide an attorney in all cases for those who can't afford one - powerful repudiation of Betts v Brady
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Weeks v US 1914
Clinton v New York 1998
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
2. Commerce clause of the constitution does not give congress the power to regulate guns near state operated schools
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Baker v Carr 1962
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
United States v Lopez 1995
3. No such thing as executive privilege in criminal cases - but definitely at other times
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
US v Nixon 1974
Marbury v Madison 1803
Miranda v Arizona 1966
4. Separate but equal for races
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Gitlow v NY 1925
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
5. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press - prevents prior restraint -state injunctions to prevent publication unconstitutional
Furman v Georgia 1972
Near v Minnesota 1931
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
Kelo v New London 2005
6. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime - selectively incorporated right to lawful assembly to all state governments
Marbury v Madison 1803
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Bush v Gore 2000
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
7. Legitimate use of eminent domain - town wanting to buy private land and turn it over to private developers
Kelo v New London 2005
Weeks v US 1914
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Korematsu v US 1944
8. Secular rather than religious purpose? neither promote nor discourage religion? avoid 'excessive entanglement?'
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US v Nixon 1974
9. Overruled Powell - state govs do not have to provide lawyers to indigent defendants in capital cases
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Betts v Brady 1942
Weeks v US 1914
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
10. Strikes by labor unions are constitutional
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
11. Court rebuffed an attempt by state of New Hampshire to take control of Dartmouth by holding that Dartmouth's corporate charter was qualified as a contract between private parties
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
12. Clear and present danger (yelling fire) - Holmes
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Schenck v US 1919
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
13. Established judicial review
Epperson v Arkansas 1968
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Mapp v Ohio 1961
Marbury v Madison 1803
14. Ordered house districts to be near as equal as possible - enshrined principal of 'one man - one vote.'
Grayned v City of rockford 1972
Olmstead v US 1928
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Lawrence v Texas 2003
15. Federal courts = final authority on creation of house districts
Texas v Johnson 1989
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Baker v Carr 1962
Smith v Allwright 1944
16. First time court overturned state law on constitutional grounds.
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Near v Minnesota 1931
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Fletcher v Peck 1810
17. Parents may remove children from public school for religious reasons
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
Korematsu v US 1944
Smith v Allwright 1944
Abington School District v Schempp 1963
18. Fed can limit speech that doesn't lead to action (upholding Smith Act - which made it a crime to support any communist organization)
US v Nixon 1974
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Dennis v US 1951
Furman v Georgia 1972
19. Right to privacy
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Texas v Johnson 1989
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Fletcher v Peck 1810
20. Not libel when they thought it was true at the time of printing
New York Times v Sullivan 1964
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
21. Fighting words - certain offensive types of speech prohibited
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Gitlow v NY 1925
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
22. African Americans denied right to vote in primaries = violate fifteenth amendment
Weeks v US 1914
Bush v Gore 2000
Smith v Allwright 1944
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
23. School district can suspend students for lewd or indecent speech
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Bethel School district v Fraser 1986
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
24. Confessions given immediately before rights are given means the confession is still admissible
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Clinton v New York 1998
25. State prohibition of consensual sodomy in private is unreasonable invasion of privacy
Powell v Alabama 1932
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
Lawrence v Texas 2003
26. States cannot set term limits on members of congress
Lemon v Kurtzman 1971
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
Betts v Brady 1942
27. FCRA mandated that places of public accommodation are prohibited from discrimination against blacks
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US 1964
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Clinton v New York 1998
28. Made the CRA 1964 apply to virtually all businesses
New York Times v US 1971
Dennis v US 1951
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Fletcher v Peck 1810
29. Intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment speech as long as it was about a public official - and no one would actually think it was fact
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
Betts v Brady 1942
Gregg v Georgia 1976
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
30. Executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
New York Times v US 1971
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Barron v Baltimore 1819
31. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
US v Nixon 1974
32. Banned presidential use of a line=item veto as a violation of legislative powers.
Clinton v New York 1998
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
33. Any defendant who asked for a lawyer had to have one granted to him - or any confession after that point is inadmissible
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Katzenbach v McClung 1964
Hustler Magazine v Falwell 1988
34. Protesters have substantially fewer assembly rights in malls and other private establishments
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Woodson v North Carolina 1976
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Baker v Carr 1962
35. Giving money to political campaign = free speech - so wealthy people can now spend as much of their own money as they want if they choose to run for federal office
Schenck v US 1919
Buckley v Baleo 1976
Lloyd corporation v Tanner 1972
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
36. Extended exclusionary rule to the states
Mapp v Ohio 1961
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Clinton v New York 1998
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
37. Gave states more power to regulate abortion
Dennis v US 1951
Webster v Reproductive Health Services 1987
Brown v Board 2nd 1955
Shaw v Reno 1993 and Miller v Johnson 1995
38. Florida recount in 2000 election was a violation of fourteenth amendment's equal protection clause
Bush v Gore 2000
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Furman v Georgia 1972
Fletcher v Peck 1810
39. Students don't 'shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door -' Iowa students suspended for wearing armbands to protest Vietnam war
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Korematsu v US 1944
DeJonge v Oregon 1937
US v Nixon 1974
40. Forbids execution of defendants who are mentally retarded
Oregon v Elstad 1985
New York Times v US 1971
US v Eichman 1990
Gregg v Georgia 1976
41. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Griswold v Connecticut 1965
Furman v Georgia 1972
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942
42. Separate is not equal
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954
Brandenburg v Ohio 1969
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Texas v Johnson 1989
43. Mandated 21-year-old drinking age (if you don't feds will take away all federal highway funds
South Dakota v Dole 1987
Clinton v New York 1998
Wesberry v Sanders 1963
Wisconsin v Yoder 1972
44. NY could not grant steamship company monopoly - increased federal power over interstate commerce
Thornhill v Alabama 1940
Oregon v Elstad 1985
Katz v US 1967
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
45. Cities could legitimately require parade permits in the interest of pubic order (Jehovah's Witnesses march w/out permit)
Fletcher v Peck 1810
Cox v New Hampshire 1941
Texas v Johnson 1989
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
46. Libel and obscenity not protected by first amendment - so three-part obscenity test established
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
US Term Limits v Thornton 1995
Korematsu v US 1944
Miller v California 1973
47. Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools
Tinker v Des Moines 1969
Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992
Roe v Wade 1973
Engel v Vitale 1962
48. BSA could expel any homosexual member they wanted because of first amendment right of expressive association
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
US v Nixon 1974
Regents of the University of California v Bakke 1978
49. Overturned Olmstead - warrants were required to listen in on phone conversation
Lawrence v Texas 2003
Dartmouth college v woodward 1819
Furman v Georgia 1972
Katz v US 1967
50. Threw out undergraduate system of selection - generally upheld Bakke
Gitlow v NY 1925
Boy Scouts of America v Dale 2000
Grutter & Gratz v Bollinger 2003
New York Times v Sullivan 1964