SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Bush v Gore
2. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Escobedo v Ilinois
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Gideon v Wainwright
3. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Korematsu v United States
Engel v Vitale
Gideon v Wainwright
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
4. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Bush v Gore
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Bowers v Hardwick
5. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Near v Minnesota
Korematsu v United States
Miller v California
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
6. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Harris v Forklift Service
Casey v Planned Parenthood
NAACP v Alabama
Miller v California
7. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Palko v Connecticut
NAACP v Alabama
Baker v Car
8. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
United States v Eichman
Lemon v Kurtzman
Grutter v Bollinger
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
9. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Baker v Car
Roth v United States
Brown v Board of Education
10. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Barron v Baltimore
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Employment Division v Smith
11. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Adarand v Pena
Palko v Connecticut
Texas v Johnson
New York Times v Sullivan
12. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Plessy v Ferguson
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Miranda v Arizona
Adarand v Pena
13. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Employment Division v Smith
Buckley v. Valeo
Wolf v Colorado
Gideon v Wainwright
14. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Reno v ACLU
Korematsu v United States
Plessy v Ferguson
Baker v Car
15. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Gideon v Wainwright
Plessy v Ferguson
Katz v United States
Near v Minnesota
16. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
United States v Eichman
Escobedo v Ilinois
New York Times v Sullivan
Reno v ACLU
17. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Roth v United States
Bowers v Hardwick
Miller v California
Mapp v Ohio
18. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Gideon v Wainwright
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Griswold v Connecticut
Brown v Board of Education
19. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Wolf v Colorado
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Miller v California
20. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Bowers v Hardwick
Mapp v Ohio
Roe v Wade
Texas v Johnson
21. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Gregg v Georgia
Gitlow v United States
22. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Gitlow v United States
Mapp v Ohio
Buckley v. Valeo
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
23. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Gregg v Georgia
Wolf v Colorado
Tinker v Des Moines School District
24. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Wolf v Colorado
Katz v United States
Korematsu v United States
Gitlow v United States
25. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Texas v Johnson
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Grutter v Bollinger
Near v Minnesota
26. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Bush v Gore
Palko v Connecticut
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Miranda v Arizona
27. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Roe v Wade
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Wisconsin v Yoder
28. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Employment Division v Smith
Texas v Johnson
Plessy v Ferguson
Miranda v Arizona
29. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Employment Division v Smith
Gitlow v United States
Bush v Gore
Wisconsin v Yoder
30. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Schnek v United States
Wolf v Colorado
Harris v Forklift Service
31. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Gregg v Georgia
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Adarand v Pena
Engel v Vitale
32. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Adarand v Pena
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Miller v California
Roth v United States
33. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Lemon v Kurtzman
Adarand v Pena
Schnek v United States
Reno v ACLU
34. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Grutter v Bollinger
Buckley v. Valeo
35. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Gregg v Georgia
Plessy v Ferguson
Texas v Johnson
New York Times v Sullivan
36. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Brown v Board of Education
Roe v Wade
Gregg v Georgia
Miranda v Arizona
37. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Texas v Johnson
Buckley v. Valeo
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Near v Minnesota
38. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Miranda v Arizona
Roe v Wade
Gideon v Wainwright
Escobedo v Ilinois
39. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Barron v Baltimore
Wisconsin v Yoder
Employment Division v Smith
Escobedo v Ilinois
40. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Palko v Connecticut
Mapp v Ohio
Plessy v Ferguson
41. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Griswold v Connecticut
Grutter v Bollinger
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Katz v United States
42. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Katz v United States
Engel v Vitale
43. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Barron v Baltimore
Grutter v Bollinger
Bowers v Hardwick
United States v Eichman
44. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Employment Division v Smith
Gregg v Georgia
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Brown v Board of Education
45. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Near v Minnesota
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
46. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Escobedo v Ilinois
Wolf v Colorado
Barron v Baltimore
Baker v Car