SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Texas v Johnson
Harris v Forklift Service
Gitlow v United States
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
2. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
NAACP v Alabama
Korematsu v United States
Lemon v Kurtzman
3. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Roe v Wade
Grutter v Bollinger
Mapp v Ohio
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
4. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Lemon v Kurtzman
United States v Eichman
Miranda v Arizona
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
5. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Wisconsin v Yoder
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Katz v United States
New York Times v Sullivan
6. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Wisconsin v Yoder
Adarand v Pena
Wolf v Colorado
Bush v Gore
7. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Gideon v Wainwright
Miller v California
Texas v Johnson
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
8. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Katz v United States
Engel v Vitale
Korematsu v United States
Roe v Wade
9. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Escobedo v Ilinois
Grutter v Bollinger
Palko v Connecticut
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
10. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Reno v ACLU
Harris v Forklift Service
Adarand v Pena
NAACP v Alabama
11. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Wisconsin v Yoder
12. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
NAACP v Alabama
Gitlow v United States
Griswold v Connecticut
Wisconsin v Yoder
13. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
NAACP v Alabama
Gitlow v United States
Katz v United States
Brown v Board of Education
14. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Baker v Car
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Gregg v Georgia
Harris v Forklift Service
15. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Brown v Board of Education
Gitlow v United States
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Casey v Planned Parenthood
16. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Miranda v Arizona
Wisconsin v Yoder
Griswold v Connecticut
17. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Plessy v Ferguson
Schnek v United States
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Engel v Vitale
18. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Near v Minnesota
Katz v United States
Gitlow v United States
Lemon v Kurtzman
19. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Adarand v Pena
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Plessy v Ferguson
20. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Gitlow v United States
Korematsu v United States
Mapp v Ohio
21. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Katz v United States
Palko v Connecticut
Adarand v Pena
22. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Buckley v. Valeo
Harris v Forklift Service
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
23. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Tinker v Des Moines School District
24. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Grutter v Bollinger
Employment Division v Smith
Bush v Gore
Miller v California
25. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Palko v Connecticut
New York Times v Sullivan
26. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Schnek v United States
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
27. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
United States v Eichman
Employment Division v Smith
Texas v Johnson
Brown v Board of Education
28. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Reno v ACLU
Grutter v Bollinger
Griswold v Connecticut
Buckley v. Valeo
29. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Near v Minnesota
United States v Eichman
Gregg v Georgia
Mapp v Ohio
30. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Mapp v Ohio
Korematsu v United States
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
31. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Gideon v Wainwright
Katz v United States
Barron v Baltimore
Adarand v Pena
32. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Roth v United States
Bowers v Hardwick
United States v Eichman
33. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Gideon v Wainwright
Baker v Car
Miranda v Arizona
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
34. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Miller v California
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Buckley v. Valeo
35. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Korematsu v United States
Brown v Board of Education
Miranda v Arizona
United States v Eichman
36. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Mapp v Ohio
Katz v United States
Harris v Forklift Service
Roe v Wade
37. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Palko v Connecticut
Wisconsin v Yoder
Katz v United States
Casey v Planned Parenthood
38. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Miller v California
Grutter v Bollinger
United States v Eichman
Engel v Vitale
39. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Brown v Board of Education
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Roth v United States
Plessy v Ferguson
40. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Wolf v Colorado
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Near v Minnesota
NAACP v Alabama
41. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Gideon v Wainwright
Mapp v Ohio
Gregg v Georgia
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
42. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
NAACP v Alabama
Roe v Wade
Grutter v Bollinger
Buckley v. Valeo
43. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Reno v ACLU
Barron v Baltimore
Escobedo v Ilinois
Texas v Johnson
44. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Escobedo v Ilinois
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Palko v Connecticut
Reno v ACLU
45. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Bowers v Hardwick
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Plessy v Ferguson
Reno v ACLU
46. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Roth v United States
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Plessy v Ferguson