SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Griswold v Connecticut
United States v Eichman
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Schnek v United States
2. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Grutter v Bollinger
Mapp v Ohio
Bowers v Hardwick
Adarand v Pena
3. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Harris v Forklift Service
Tinker v Des Moines School District
4. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Miller v California
Wolf v Colorado
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
5. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Lemon v Kurtzman
Engel v Vitale
Plessy v Ferguson
Employment Division v Smith
6. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Adarand v Pena
New York Times v Sullivan
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
7. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Schnek v United States
United States v Eichman
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
8. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Near v Minnesota
Miller v California
Wolf v Colorado
Mapp v Ohio
9. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Brown v Board of Education
Barron v Baltimore
Roe v Wade
10. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Korematsu v United States
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Plessy v Ferguson
Escobedo v Ilinois
11. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Schnek v United States
Gitlow v United States
Miller v California
Miranda v Arizona
12. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Harris v Forklift Service
New York Times v Sullivan
Schnek v United States
Grutter v Bollinger
13. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Buckley v. Valeo
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Texas v Johnson
Lemon v Kurtzman
14. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Miranda v Arizona
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
15. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Palko v Connecticut
Schnek v United States
Katz v United States
16. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
United States v Eichman
Gregg v Georgia
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Katz v United States
17. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Buckley v. Valeo
Gideon v Wainwright
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
18. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Wisconsin v Yoder
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Grutter v Bollinger
19. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
United States v Eichman
Brown v Board of Education
Roe v Wade
Wisconsin v Yoder
20. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Employment Division v Smith
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
21. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Baker v Car
Bush v Gore
Reno v ACLU
Mapp v Ohio
22. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Harris v Forklift Service
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Mapp v Ohio
Roth v United States
23. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Palko v Connecticut
Miller v California
Adarand v Pena
Buckley v. Valeo
24. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Adarand v Pena
Mapp v Ohio
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Roth v United States
25. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Barron v Baltimore
Bush v Gore
Engel v Vitale
NAACP v Alabama
26. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
NAACP v Alabama
Palko v Connecticut
Korematsu v United States
Roth v United States
27. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Gitlow v United States
Palko v Connecticut
Gideon v Wainwright
Lemon v Kurtzman
28. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Gitlow v United States
Bush v Gore
Adarand v Pena
Palko v Connecticut
29. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Gregg v Georgia
Reno v ACLU
Gitlow v United States
Wolf v Colorado
30. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Barron v Baltimore
Adarand v Pena
Texas v Johnson
Casey v Planned Parenthood
31. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Adarand v Pena
Barron v Baltimore
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
32. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Miranda v Arizona
Roe v Wade
Palko v Connecticut
Plessy v Ferguson
33. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Near v Minnesota
Gitlow v United States
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Grutter v Bollinger
34. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Roth v United States
Korematsu v United States
Katz v United States
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
35. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
New York Times v Sullivan
Gitlow v United States
Roth v United States
Mapp v Ohio
36. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Miller v California
Schnek v United States
Wisconsin v Yoder
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
37. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Escobedo v Ilinois
Reno v ACLU
Employment Division v Smith
Gideon v Wainwright
38. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Lemon v Kurtzman
Gideon v Wainwright
Engel v Vitale
Baker v Car
39. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Griswold v Connecticut
Bush v Gore
New York Times v Sullivan
Brown v Board of Education
40. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Plessy v Ferguson
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
NAACP v Alabama
41. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Wolf v Colorado
Brown v Board of Education
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Bowers v Hardwick
42. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
NAACP v Alabama
Casey v Planned Parenthood
New York Times v Sullivan
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
43. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Bush v Gore
Griswold v Connecticut
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Employment Division v Smith
44. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
NAACP v Alabama
United States v Eichman
Katz v United States
Wolf v Colorado
45. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Miller v California
Escobedo v Ilinois
46. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Plessy v Ferguson
Baker v Car
Korematsu v United States