SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Harris v Forklift Service
Mapp v Ohio
2. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Gitlow v United States
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Bush v Gore
Miller v California
3. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Schnek v United States
Miranda v Arizona
Miller v California
Barron v Baltimore
4. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Barron v Baltimore
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Lemon v Kurtzman
5. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Gitlow v United States
United States v Eichman
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Wisconsin v Yoder
6. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Korematsu v United States
Miller v California
Near v Minnesota
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
7. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Roth v United States
New York Times v Sullivan
Gregg v Georgia
Griswold v Connecticut
8. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Katz v United States
Mapp v Ohio
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Gitlow v United States
9. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Palko v Connecticut
Bush v Gore
Engel v Vitale
Escobedo v Ilinois
10. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Roth v United States
Texas v Johnson
Reno v ACLU
Katz v United States
11. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Mapp v Ohio
Korematsu v United States
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Employment Division v Smith
12. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Mapp v Ohio
Grutter v Bollinger
Texas v Johnson
Casey v Planned Parenthood
13. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Buckley v. Valeo
Texas v Johnson
Employment Division v Smith
Gitlow v United States
14. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Texas v Johnson
Miller v California
Lemon v Kurtzman
Engel v Vitale
15. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Gideon v Wainwright
Engel v Vitale
Brown v Board of Education
Escobedo v Ilinois
16. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Bowers v Hardwick
Katz v United States
NAACP v Alabama
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
17. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Wolf v Colorado
Korematsu v United States
Gitlow v United States
18. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Plessy v Ferguson
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Casey v Planned Parenthood
19. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Harris v Forklift Service
Grutter v Bollinger
Lemon v Kurtzman
Adarand v Pena
20. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Gregg v Georgia
Employment Division v Smith
United States v Eichman
Plessy v Ferguson
21. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Roe v Wade
Palko v Connecticut
Lemon v Kurtzman
New York Times v Sullivan
22. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
NAACP v Alabama
Wisconsin v Yoder
United States v Eichman
Barron v Baltimore
23. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Gregg v Georgia
New York Times v Sullivan
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Texas v Johnson
24. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Gitlow v United States
Wisconsin v Yoder
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
25. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
NAACP v Alabama
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
26. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
New York Times v Sullivan
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Katz v United States
27. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Gideon v Wainwright
Texas v Johnson
Near v Minnesota
Miller v California
28. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Lemon v Kurtzman
Bowers v Hardwick
Korematsu v United States
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
29. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Baker v Car
Wolf v Colorado
Brown v Board of Education
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
30. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
United States v Eichman
Escobedo v Ilinois
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Harris v Forklift Service
31. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Baker v Car
Engel v Vitale
Brown v Board of Education
Bowers v Hardwick
32. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Escobedo v Ilinois
Barron v Baltimore
Schnek v United States
Adarand v Pena
33. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Engel v Vitale
Gitlow v United States
Lemon v Kurtzman
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
34. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Griswold v Connecticut
Korematsu v United States
New York Times v Sullivan
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
35. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
New York Times v Sullivan
Griswold v Connecticut
Texas v Johnson
36. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Miranda v Arizona
Wolf v Colorado
New York Times v Sullivan
Miller v California
37. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Roth v United States
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Adarand v Pena
Brown v Board of Education
38. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Palko v Connecticut
Buckley v. Valeo
Katz v United States
Gregg v Georgia
39. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Near v Minnesota
Escobedo v Ilinois
Griswold v Connecticut
40. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Buckley v. Valeo
Texas v Johnson
Katz v United States
Reno v ACLU
41. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Miranda v Arizona
Gitlow v United States
Roth v United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
42. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
43. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Palko v Connecticut
Wisconsin v Yoder
Gideon v Wainwright
44. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Baker v Car
Roth v United States
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Reno v ACLU
45. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Plessy v Ferguson
New York Times v Sullivan
Miranda v Arizona
Wolf v Colorado
46. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Palko v Connecticut
Schnek v United States
Harris v Forklift Service