SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Mapp v Ohio
Baker v Car
Roth v United States
Plessy v Ferguson
2. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Buckley v. Valeo
Texas v Johnson
Near v Minnesota
Barron v Baltimore
3. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Roe v Wade
Wisconsin v Yoder
NAACP v Alabama
Bowers v Hardwick
4. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Korematsu v United States
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Bowers v Hardwick
5. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Near v Minnesota
Plessy v Ferguson
Escobedo v Ilinois
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
6. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Griswold v Connecticut
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Katz v United States
Reno v ACLU
7. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Barron v Baltimore
United States v Eichman
Wolf v Colorado
Miller v California
8. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Plessy v Ferguson
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Griswold v Connecticut
Barron v Baltimore
9. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Wolf v Colorado
Miller v California
Adarand v Pena
Baker v Car
10. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Employment Division v Smith
Grutter v Bollinger
Texas v Johnson
Wisconsin v Yoder
11. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Katz v United States
New York Times v Sullivan
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Gideon v Wainwright
12. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Korematsu v United States
Near v Minnesota
Brown v Board of Education
NAACP v Alabama
13. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Katz v United States
Gitlow v United States
Mapp v Ohio
Baker v Car
14. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Gideon v Wainwright
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
15. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Employment Division v Smith
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Texas v Johnson
New York Times v Sullivan
16. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Roe v Wade
NAACP v Alabama
Griswold v Connecticut
Wisconsin v Yoder
17. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Palko v Connecticut
Griswold v Connecticut
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Casey v Planned Parenthood
18. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Palko v Connecticut
Gideon v Wainwright
Engel v Vitale
19. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Plessy v Ferguson
Lemon v Kurtzman
Miller v California
Korematsu v United States
20. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Escobedo v Ilinois
Brown v Board of Education
Roth v United States
Bush v Gore
21. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Adarand v Pena
Schnek v United States
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Grutter v Bollinger
22. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Mapp v Ohio
Gitlow v United States
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Bush v Gore
23. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Mapp v Ohio
Schnek v United States
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
24. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
New York Times v Sullivan
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Miranda v Arizona
Gregg v Georgia
25. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Adarand v Pena
New York Times v Sullivan
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Plessy v Ferguson
26. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Katz v United States
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Roe v Wade
Schnek v United States
27. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Miranda v Arizona
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Miller v California
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
28. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Reno v ACLU
United States v Eichman
Wisconsin v Yoder
29. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Near v Minnesota
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Wisconsin v Yoder
30. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Brown v Board of Education
Reno v ACLU
Employment Division v Smith
Schnek v United States
31. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Baker v Car
Wisconsin v Yoder
Korematsu v United States
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
32. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Griswold v Connecticut
Grutter v Bollinger
Brown v Board of Education
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
33. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Bush v Gore
Near v Minnesota
34. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Escobedo v Ilinois
Adarand v Pena
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
35. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Miller v California
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Bush v Gore
36. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Gideon v Wainwright
Buckley v. Valeo
Griswold v Connecticut
37. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Buckley v. Valeo
Gideon v Wainwright
Palko v Connecticut
Barron v Baltimore
38. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Harris v Forklift Service
Baker v Car
Wisconsin v Yoder
Katz v United States
39. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Lemon v Kurtzman
Adarand v Pena
Miranda v Arizona
Grutter v Bollinger
40. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Gregg v Georgia
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Gideon v Wainwright
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
41. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Bush v Gore
Harris v Forklift Service
Near v Minnesota
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
42. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Palko v Connecticut
New York Times v Sullivan
Griswold v Connecticut
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
43. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Roth v United States
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Bush v Gore
Engel v Vitale
44. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Miller v California
Wolf v Colorado
Escobedo v Ilinois
Near v Minnesota
45. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Korematsu v United States
Reno v ACLU
Buckley v. Valeo
Brown v Board of Education
46. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Gregg v Georgia
Griswold v Connecticut
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg