SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Employment Division v Smith
Gitlow v United States
Mapp v Ohio
Casey v Planned Parenthood
2. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Engel v Vitale
Miranda v Arizona
Grutter v Bollinger
Escobedo v Ilinois
3. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Roe v Wade
Roth v United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
4. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Wisconsin v Yoder
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Gideon v Wainwright
Adarand v Pena
5. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Employment Division v Smith
Reno v ACLU
Baker v Car
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
6. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Roth v United States
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Employment Division v Smith
Casey v Planned Parenthood
7. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Brown v Board of Education
Palko v Connecticut
Reno v ACLU
Katz v United States
8. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Mapp v Ohio
Wolf v Colorado
Harris v Forklift Service
Tinker v Des Moines School District
9. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Wisconsin v Yoder
NAACP v Alabama
10. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Engel v Vitale
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
11. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Escobedo v Ilinois
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Harris v Forklift Service
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
12. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Katz v United States
Griswold v Connecticut
Korematsu v United States
Bowers v Hardwick
13. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Near v Minnesota
Roth v United States
Plessy v Ferguson
14. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Miranda v Arizona
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
15. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
United States v Eichman
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Bush v Gore
Brown v Board of Education
16. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Buckley v. Valeo
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
17. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Katz v United States
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Texas v Johnson
18. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Wolf v Colorado
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
19. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Mapp v Ohio
Schnek v United States
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
20. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Palko v Connecticut
Reno v ACLU
Adarand v Pena
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
21. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
New York Times v Sullivan
Gideon v Wainwright
Bush v Gore
22. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
New York Times v Sullivan
Korematsu v United States
Reno v ACLU
Grutter v Bollinger
23. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Mapp v Ohio
Palko v Connecticut
Reno v ACLU
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
24. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Bowers v Hardwick
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Near v Minnesota
25. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Korematsu v United States
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Near v Minnesota
Griswold v Connecticut
26. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Miller v California
Bowers v Hardwick
Grutter v Bollinger
Wolf v Colorado
27. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Roth v United States
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Buckley v. Valeo
Adarand v Pena
28. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Roe v Wade
Miranda v Arizona
Miller v California
Employment Division v Smith
29. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Bowers v Hardwick
Bush v Gore
Engel v Vitale
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
30. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
New York Times v Sullivan
Gregg v Georgia
Texas v Johnson
Katz v United States
31. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
NAACP v Alabama
Texas v Johnson
Roe v Wade
32. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Bush v Gore
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Brown v Board of Education
Barron v Baltimore
33. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Employment Division v Smith
Miller v California
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Lemon v Kurtzman
34. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Gideon v Wainwright
Wolf v Colorado
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Near v Minnesota
35. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Tinker v Des Moines School District
United States v Eichman
Baker v Car
36. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Miller v California
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Schnek v United States
37. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Bowers v Hardwick
NAACP v Alabama
Harris v Forklift Service
38. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Miller v California
Lemon v Kurtzman
Gitlow v United States
Harris v Forklift Service
39. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Brown v Board of Education
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
40. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Katz v United States
Near v Minnesota
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Adarand v Pena
41. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Gitlow v United States
Wisconsin v Yoder
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
42. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Roth v United States
Katz v United States
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Harris v Forklift Service
43. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Near v Minnesota
Lemon v Kurtzman
Korematsu v United States
Casey v Planned Parenthood
44. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Near v Minnesota
Palko v Connecticut
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Miranda v Arizona
45. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Adarand v Pena
Gregg v Georgia
46. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Grutter v Bollinger
Barron v Baltimore
Miller v California
Casey v Planned Parenthood