SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Wisconsin v Yoder
Griswold v Connecticut
Mapp v Ohio
Gitlow v United States
2. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Bush v Gore
Grutter v Bollinger
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
3. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
New York Times v Sullivan
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Roe v Wade
Gitlow v United States
4. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Engel v Vitale
Lemon v Kurtzman
Katz v United States
5. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Mapp v Ohio
Korematsu v United States
United States v Eichman
6. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Barron v Baltimore
Wisconsin v Yoder
Bowers v Hardwick
Casey v Planned Parenthood
7. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Korematsu v United States
Harris v Forklift Service
United States v Eichman
Miranda v Arizona
8. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Wolf v Colorado
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Grutter v Bollinger
Casey v Planned Parenthood
9. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Engel v Vitale
Schnek v United States
Gregg v Georgia
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
10. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Grutter v Bollinger
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Escobedo v Ilinois
Roth v United States
11. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Harris v Forklift Service
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Near v Minnesota
Gitlow v United States
12. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Gideon v Wainwright
Miranda v Arizona
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
13. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Escobedo v Ilinois
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Lemon v Kurtzman
Employment Division v Smith
14. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Miller v California
Wisconsin v Yoder
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
15. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Plessy v Ferguson
Bush v Gore
Roe v Wade
Korematsu v United States
16. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Engel v Vitale
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
New York Times v Sullivan
17. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Texas v Johnson
NAACP v Alabama
18. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Bush v Gore
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Roe v Wade
Brown v Board of Education
19. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Texas v Johnson
Bush v Gore
Escobedo v Ilinois
Bowers v Hardwick
20. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Escobedo v Ilinois
Employment Division v Smith
Near v Minnesota
Engel v Vitale
21. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Wolf v Colorado
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
United States v Eichman
22. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Engel v Vitale
Miranda v Arizona
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
23. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Harris v Forklift Service
Mapp v Ohio
Brown v Board of Education
Adarand v Pena
24. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Baker v Car
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
25. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Gregg v Georgia
Bush v Gore
Barron v Baltimore
26. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Barron v Baltimore
Reno v ACLU
Buckley v. Valeo
Engel v Vitale
27. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Harris v Forklift Service
Barron v Baltimore
New York Times v Sullivan
Bush v Gore
28. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Lemon v Kurtzman
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Brown v Board of Education
29. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Texas v Johnson
Bowers v Hardwick
Barron v Baltimore
Miller v California
30. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Roth v United States
Near v Minnesota
Texas v Johnson
Palko v Connecticut
31. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Palko v Connecticut
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Barron v Baltimore
32. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Employment Division v Smith
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Grutter v Bollinger
33. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Texas v Johnson
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
New York Times v Sullivan
34. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Near v Minnesota
Korematsu v United States
Gideon v Wainwright
Plessy v Ferguson
35. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Roe v Wade
Harris v Forklift Service
Reno v ACLU
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
36. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Buckley v. Valeo
Adarand v Pena
Texas v Johnson
Miller v California
37. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Harris v Forklift Service
Bowers v Hardwick
Baker v Car
Miranda v Arizona
38. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Miranda v Arizona
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Gregg v Georgia
39. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Adarand v Pena
Baker v Car
Mapp v Ohio
Brown v Board of Education
40. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Near v Minnesota
Miranda v Arizona
United States v Eichman
41. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Palko v Connecticut
Miranda v Arizona
United States v Eichman
Korematsu v United States
42. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Schnek v United States
Miranda v Arizona
Casey v Planned Parenthood
43. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Griswold v Connecticut
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
44. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Plessy v Ferguson
Roth v United States
Miller v California
Palko v Connecticut
45. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Palko v Connecticut
Grutter v Bollinger
Mapp v Ohio
Roe v Wade
46. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
NAACP v Alabama
Near v Minnesota
Engel v Vitale
Casey v Planned Parenthood