SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Miller v California
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
New York Times v Sullivan
Tinker v Des Moines School District
2. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Mapp v Ohio
Griswold v Connecticut
Bowers v Hardwick
3. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Reno v ACLU
Miranda v Arizona
Mapp v Ohio
Tinker v Des Moines School District
4. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Near v Minnesota
Bowers v Hardwick
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Gregg v Georgia
5. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Schnek v United States
Brown v Board of Education
Escobedo v Ilinois
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
6. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Buckley v. Valeo
United States v Eichman
Baker v Car
7. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Reno v ACLU
Katz v United States
Lemon v Kurtzman
8. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Katz v United States
New York Times v Sullivan
NAACP v Alabama
Gitlow v United States
9. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Texas v Johnson
Miranda v Arizona
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
United States v Eichman
10. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Mapp v Ohio
Roe v Wade
Miranda v Arizona
Brown v Board of Education
11. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Brown v Board of Education
Buckley v. Valeo
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Miller v California
12. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Roe v Wade
Grutter v Bollinger
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Bush v Gore
13. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Schnek v United States
Texas v Johnson
Miranda v Arizona
Engel v Vitale
14. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Bush v Gore
Gideon v Wainwright
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
15. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Brown v Board of Education
Bowers v Hardwick
Bush v Gore
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
16. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Schnek v United States
Roe v Wade
Gideon v Wainwright
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
17. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Bowers v Hardwick
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
NAACP v Alabama
18. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Adarand v Pena
Harris v Forklift Service
Employment Division v Smith
Gitlow v United States
19. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Gideon v Wainwright
Griswold v Connecticut
Barron v Baltimore
Plessy v Ferguson
20. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
NAACP v Alabama
Korematsu v United States
Bowers v Hardwick
Plessy v Ferguson
21. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Lemon v Kurtzman
Korematsu v United States
Gregg v Georgia
Gitlow v United States
22. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Buckley v. Valeo
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Bowers v Hardwick
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
23. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Miranda v Arizona
Korematsu v United States
Buckley v. Valeo
Engel v Vitale
24. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Gregg v Georgia
Plessy v Ferguson
Harris v Forklift Service
Employment Division v Smith
25. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Korematsu v United States
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Plessy v Ferguson
Adarand v Pena
26. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Miranda v Arizona
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Katz v United States
Gideon v Wainwright
27. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Palko v Connecticut
Adarand v Pena
Reno v ACLU
Tinker v Des Moines School District
28. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Katz v United States
Grutter v Bollinger
Schnek v United States
Korematsu v United States
29. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Roth v United States
Brown v Board of Education
30. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Miranda v Arizona
Palko v Connecticut
Engel v Vitale
Schnek v United States
31. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Korematsu v United States
Miller v California
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
32. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Reno v ACLU
Wisconsin v Yoder
Schnek v United States
33. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Plessy v Ferguson
Lemon v Kurtzman
Escobedo v Ilinois
Buckley v. Valeo
34. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Gideon v Wainwright
Katz v United States
35. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Plessy v Ferguson
Near v Minnesota
Engel v Vitale
Roe v Wade
36. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Wolf v Colorado
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Mapp v Ohio
Gitlow v United States
37. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Roth v United States
Employment Division v Smith
Tinker v Des Moines School District
NAACP v Alabama
38. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Near v Minnesota
Gideon v Wainwright
Palko v Connecticut
Roth v United States
39. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Gideon v Wainwright
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Wisconsin v Yoder
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
40. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Barron v Baltimore
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Gitlow v United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
41. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Roth v United States
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Employment Division v Smith
Tinker v Des Moines School District
42. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Katz v United States
Gregg v Georgia
Bowers v Hardwick
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
43. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Lemon v Kurtzman
Roth v United States
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
44. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Brown v Board of Education
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Employment Division v Smith
Roth v United States
45. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Texas v Johnson
Korematsu v United States
Escobedo v Ilinois
Schnek v United States
46. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Roth v United States
Gideon v Wainwright
Palko v Connecticut
United States v Eichman