SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Gitlow v United States
Plessy v Ferguson
Engel v Vitale
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
2. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Wisconsin v Yoder
Plessy v Ferguson
3. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
New York Times v Sullivan
Roth v United States
Gitlow v United States
4. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Lemon v Kurtzman
Adarand v Pena
Mapp v Ohio
Bowers v Hardwick
5. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Adarand v Pena
Harris v Forklift Service
Near v Minnesota
Escobedo v Ilinois
6. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Miller v California
Schnek v United States
NAACP v Alabama
Miranda v Arizona
7. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Roe v Wade
NAACP v Alabama
Wolf v Colorado
Plessy v Ferguson
8. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
New York Times v Sullivan
Schnek v United States
Mapp v Ohio
Wolf v Colorado
9. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Engel v Vitale
Miranda v Arizona
Griswold v Connecticut
10. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Miranda v Arizona
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Texas v Johnson
11. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
United States v Eichman
New York Times v Sullivan
Escobedo v Ilinois
Gregg v Georgia
12. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Miller v California
Plessy v Ferguson
Gideon v Wainwright
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
13. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Mapp v Ohio
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Palko v Connecticut
Near v Minnesota
14. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Bowers v Hardwick
Lemon v Kurtzman
Engel v Vitale
Gitlow v United States
15. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Grutter v Bollinger
Mapp v Ohio
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Reno v ACLU
16. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Reno v ACLU
Gregg v Georgia
Buckley v. Valeo
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
17. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Miller v California
Miranda v Arizona
Roth v United States
18. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Brown v Board of Education
Buckley v. Valeo
Barron v Baltimore
Bowers v Hardwick
19. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Wisconsin v Yoder
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Miller v California
Gitlow v United States
20. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Lemon v Kurtzman
Wolf v Colorado
Buckley v. Valeo
Roe v Wade
21. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Employment Division v Smith
New York Times v Sullivan
Adarand v Pena
Gideon v Wainwright
22. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Schnek v United States
Gregg v Georgia
Barron v Baltimore
Engel v Vitale
23. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
NAACP v Alabama
Bush v Gore
Adarand v Pena
Korematsu v United States
24. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Engel v Vitale
Escobedo v Ilinois
Schnek v United States
Brown v Board of Education
25. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Buckley v. Valeo
Katz v United States
Near v Minnesota
Wisconsin v Yoder
26. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
New York Times v Sullivan
Baker v Car
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
27. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Employment Division v Smith
28. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Texas v Johnson
Wolf v Colorado
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Escobedo v Ilinois
29. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Wisconsin v Yoder
Katz v United States
Employment Division v Smith
30. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Miranda v Arizona
Employment Division v Smith
NAACP v Alabama
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
31. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Baker v Car
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Grutter v Bollinger
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
32. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Griswold v Connecticut
Wisconsin v Yoder
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Reno v ACLU
33. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Near v Minnesota
Employment Division v Smith
Plessy v Ferguson
34. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Roe v Wade
Texas v Johnson
Buckley v. Valeo
Gideon v Wainwright
35. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Escobedo v Ilinois
Wisconsin v Yoder
Katz v United States
36. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Miranda v Arizona
Reno v ACLU
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
37. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Harris v Forklift Service
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
NAACP v Alabama
Wisconsin v Yoder
38. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Wolf v Colorado
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Schnek v United States
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
39. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Reno v ACLU
Palko v Connecticut
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Brown v Board of Education
40. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Schnek v United States
Buckley v. Valeo
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Griswold v Connecticut
41. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Baker v Car
Schnek v United States
Roth v United States
42. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Lemon v Kurtzman
Texas v Johnson
Engel v Vitale
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
43. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Brown v Board of Education
Near v Minnesota
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
44. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Korematsu v United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Palko v Connecticut
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
45. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Miranda v Arizona
Brown v Board of Education
Korematsu v United States
Gitlow v United States
46. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Bush v Gore
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Adarand v Pena
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire