SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Schnek v United States
Bowers v Hardwick
Roe v Wade
Miller v California
2. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Engel v Vitale
NAACP v Alabama
Korematsu v United States
Brown v Board of Education
3. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Roth v United States
Gideon v Wainwright
Texas v Johnson
Miranda v Arizona
4. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Reno v ACLU
5. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Near v Minnesota
Schnek v United States
Griswold v Connecticut
Gregg v Georgia
6. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Bowers v Hardwick
Baker v Car
Employment Division v Smith
New York Times v Sullivan
7. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Bowers v Hardwick
Harris v Forklift Service
Gregg v Georgia
Adarand v Pena
8. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Wolf v Colorado
Bush v Gore
Lemon v Kurtzman
Casey v Planned Parenthood
9. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Texas v Johnson
Baker v Car
Lemon v Kurtzman
Gitlow v United States
10. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Gitlow v United States
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Barron v Baltimore
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
11. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Reno v ACLU
Plessy v Ferguson
Mapp v Ohio
Wolf v Colorado
12. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Texas v Johnson
United States v Eichman
Gitlow v United States
Mapp v Ohio
13. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Lemon v Kurtzman
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Bowers v Hardwick
14. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Brown v Board of Education
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
15. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Gitlow v United States
Griswold v Connecticut
Tinker v Des Moines School District
New York Times v Sullivan
16. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Griswold v Connecticut
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Gitlow v United States
Barron v Baltimore
17. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Miller v California
Korematsu v United States
NAACP v Alabama
Tinker v Des Moines School District
18. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Miller v California
Gitlow v United States
Wisconsin v Yoder
NAACP v Alabama
19. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Barron v Baltimore
Wolf v Colorado
Miranda v Arizona
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
20. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Plessy v Ferguson
Barron v Baltimore
21. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Wolf v Colorado
Palko v Connecticut
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Barron v Baltimore
22. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Texas v Johnson
NAACP v Alabama
Schnek v United States
Katz v United States
23. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Korematsu v United States
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Plessy v Ferguson
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
24. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Escobedo v Ilinois
Schnek v United States
Katz v United States
Texas v Johnson
25. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Grutter v Bollinger
Adarand v Pena
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Lemon v Kurtzman
26. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Reno v ACLU
Bowers v Hardwick
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
United States v Eichman
27. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Schnek v United States
Engel v Vitale
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Katz v United States
28. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
NAACP v Alabama
United States v Eichman
Barron v Baltimore
Miller v California
29. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Gitlow v United States
Escobedo v Ilinois
Palko v Connecticut
30. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Texas v Johnson
Bush v Gore
Roth v United States
31. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Wisconsin v Yoder
Employment Division v Smith
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
32. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Wolf v Colorado
Buckley v. Valeo
33. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
NAACP v Alabama
Miller v California
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Wisconsin v Yoder
34. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Grutter v Bollinger
Engel v Vitale
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Wisconsin v Yoder
35. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Wisconsin v Yoder
Griswold v Connecticut
Gideon v Wainwright
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
36. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Gregg v Georgia
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Bowers v Hardwick
37. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
New York Times v Sullivan
Katz v United States
Grutter v Bollinger
38. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Katz v United States
Employment Division v Smith
Grutter v Bollinger
Reno v ACLU
39. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Baker v Car
Plessy v Ferguson
NAACP v Alabama
40. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Texas v Johnson
Brown v Board of Education
Korematsu v United States
Mapp v Ohio
41. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Adarand v Pena
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Bush v Gore
Employment Division v Smith
42. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Miranda v Arizona
Buckley v. Valeo
Schnek v United States
Harris v Forklift Service
43. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Gideon v Wainwright
Harris v Forklift Service
Escobedo v Ilinois
44. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Bowers v Hardwick
Grutter v Bollinger
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Barron v Baltimore
45. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Near v Minnesota
Bush v Gore
Lemon v Kurtzman
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
46. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Schnek v United States
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Griswold v Connecticut
Wolf v Colorado