SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Engel v Vitale
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Gideon v Wainwright
2. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Escobedo v Ilinois
Grutter v Bollinger
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Gitlow v United States
3. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
United States v Eichman
Roth v United States
Reno v ACLU
4. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Brown v Board of Education
Grutter v Bollinger
Gregg v Georgia
Lemon v Kurtzman
5. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Lemon v Kurtzman
Gideon v Wainwright
Gitlow v United States
Adarand v Pena
6. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Wolf v Colorado
Baker v Car
Texas v Johnson
Griswold v Connecticut
7. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Baker v Car
Buckley v. Valeo
Bowers v Hardwick
Engel v Vitale
8. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Gregg v Georgia
Wolf v Colorado
Katz v United States
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
9. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Palko v Connecticut
Barron v Baltimore
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Miranda v Arizona
10. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Texas v Johnson
Bush v Gore
Wisconsin v Yoder
Grutter v Bollinger
11. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Near v Minnesota
Miranda v Arizona
Wolf v Colorado
12. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Miller v California
Korematsu v United States
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Reno v ACLU
13. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Grutter v Bollinger
Katz v United States
New York Times v Sullivan
Texas v Johnson
14. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Palko v Connecticut
Miranda v Arizona
Texas v Johnson
Roe v Wade
15. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Gitlow v United States
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Wisconsin v Yoder
16. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Katz v United States
Miranda v Arizona
Texas v Johnson
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
17. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Bush v Gore
Adarand v Pena
Grutter v Bollinger
18. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Miller v California
Mapp v Ohio
Wolf v Colorado
NAACP v Alabama
19. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Escobedo v Ilinois
United States v Eichman
Tinker v Des Moines School District
20. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Baker v Car
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Harris v Forklift Service
21. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Katz v United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Reno v ACLU
Miller v California
22. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Engel v Vitale
Escobedo v Ilinois
Bowers v Hardwick
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
23. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Plessy v Ferguson
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Miller v California
Wolf v Colorado
24. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Baker v Car
Employment Division v Smith
United States v Eichman
25. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Texas v Johnson
Gideon v Wainwright
Griswold v Connecticut
26. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Katz v United States
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Wolf v Colorado
United States v Eichman
27. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Gitlow v United States
Reno v ACLU
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
28. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Griswold v Connecticut
NAACP v Alabama
Wolf v Colorado
Casey v Planned Parenthood
29. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Wisconsin v Yoder
Baker v Car
Palko v Connecticut
Miranda v Arizona
30. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Escobedo v Ilinois
Gitlow v United States
Miranda v Arizona
31. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
NAACP v Alabama
Plessy v Ferguson
Miranda v Arizona
32. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Harris v Forklift Service
Wolf v Colorado
Baker v Car
Lemon v Kurtzman
33. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Barron v Baltimore
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Roth v United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
34. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Korematsu v United States
Employment Division v Smith
Wolf v Colorado
Schnek v United States
35. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Lemon v Kurtzman
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Miller v California
36. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Palko v Connecticut
Barron v Baltimore
Miranda v Arizona
37. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Grutter v Bollinger
Gitlow v United States
Bowers v Hardwick
NAACP v Alabama
38. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Brown v Board of Education
Roth v United States
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
39. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Buckley v. Valeo
Plessy v Ferguson
Baker v Car
Miranda v Arizona
40. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Engel v Vitale
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Grutter v Bollinger
Bush v Gore
41. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Miranda v Arizona
Schnek v United States
Wolf v Colorado
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
42. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Escobedo v Ilinois
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Barron v Baltimore
Baker v Car
43. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Engel v Vitale
Buckley v. Valeo
Bush v Gore
44. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Grutter v Bollinger
Wolf v Colorado
Texas v Johnson
Escobedo v Ilinois
45. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Gitlow v United States
Grutter v Bollinger
Lemon v Kurtzman
Wolf v Colorado
46. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Bowers v Hardwick
Buckley v. Valeo