SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Baker v Car
Katz v United States
Palko v Connecticut
2. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Korematsu v United States
Brown v Board of Education
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
3. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Barron v Baltimore
Miranda v Arizona
Plessy v Ferguson
4. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Reno v ACLU
Lemon v Kurtzman
Harris v Forklift Service
5. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Griswold v Connecticut
Harris v Forklift Service
NAACP v Alabama
6. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Employment Division v Smith
Roe v Wade
Korematsu v United States
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
7. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Texas v Johnson
NAACP v Alabama
Near v Minnesota
Barron v Baltimore
8. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Gideon v Wainwright
Wolf v Colorado
Roe v Wade
Engel v Vitale
9. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Lemon v Kurtzman
Engel v Vitale
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Gideon v Wainwright
10. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
United States v Eichman
Texas v Johnson
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Miranda v Arizona
11. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Roe v Wade
Mapp v Ohio
Wolf v Colorado
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
12. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
United States v Eichman
Grutter v Bollinger
Gitlow v United States
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
13. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Gitlow v United States
Griswold v Connecticut
Brown v Board of Education
Lemon v Kurtzman
14. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Wisconsin v Yoder
Miranda v Arizona
Brown v Board of Education
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
15. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Lemon v Kurtzman
Engel v Vitale
Wisconsin v Yoder
Schnek v United States
16. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Buckley v. Valeo
New York Times v Sullivan
Engel v Vitale
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
17. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Near v Minnesota
Baker v Car
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Wolf v Colorado
18. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
United States v Eichman
Brown v Board of Education
NAACP v Alabama
19. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Lemon v Kurtzman
Bowers v Hardwick
Miller v California
Buckley v. Valeo
20. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Mapp v Ohio
Grutter v Bollinger
Employment Division v Smith
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
21. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Wisconsin v Yoder
Harris v Forklift Service
United States v Eichman
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
22. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Grutter v Bollinger
Baker v Car
Mapp v Ohio
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
23. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Baker v Car
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Miller v California
United States v Eichman
24. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Plessy v Ferguson
Reno v ACLU
25. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Roth v United States
Near v Minnesota
Engel v Vitale
Harris v Forklift Service
26. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Griswold v Connecticut
Escobedo v Ilinois
Buckley v. Valeo
Plessy v Ferguson
27. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Palko v Connecticut
Gideon v Wainwright
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
28. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Lemon v Kurtzman
Miller v California
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Adarand v Pena
29. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Engel v Vitale
New York Times v Sullivan
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Buckley v. Valeo
30. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Barron v Baltimore
Reno v ACLU
Brown v Board of Education
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
31. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
United States v Eichman
Near v Minnesota
Gideon v Wainwright
Bush v Gore
32. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Barron v Baltimore
Grutter v Bollinger
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Gitlow v United States
33. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Harris v Forklift Service
Korematsu v United States
Schnek v United States
Roth v United States
34. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Barron v Baltimore
Schnek v United States
Bush v Gore
Roe v Wade
35. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Lemon v Kurtzman
Employment Division v Smith
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Roth v United States
36. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Adarand v Pena
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Plessy v Ferguson
Katz v United States
37. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Roe v Wade
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Schnek v United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
38. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Lemon v Kurtzman
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
39. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Gregg v Georgia
Brown v Board of Education
Baker v Car
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
40. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Texas v Johnson
Korematsu v United States
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Schnek v United States
41. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Roe v Wade
Grutter v Bollinger
Katz v United States
Wisconsin v Yoder
42. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Adarand v Pena
Lemon v Kurtzman
Barron v Baltimore
Texas v Johnson
43. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Buckley v. Valeo
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Engel v Vitale
Barron v Baltimore
44. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Brown v Board of Education
United States v Eichman
Employment Division v Smith
Gregg v Georgia
45. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Adarand v Pena
Gitlow v United States
Palko v Connecticut
46. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Buckley v. Valeo
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Harris v Forklift Service