SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Palko v Connecticut
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Harris v Forklift Service
Wisconsin v Yoder
2. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
NAACP v Alabama
Gregg v Georgia
3. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
New York Times v Sullivan
Texas v Johnson
Buckley v. Valeo
NAACP v Alabama
4. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Schnek v United States
United States v Eichman
Gideon v Wainwright
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
5. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Engel v Vitale
Baker v Car
Roe v Wade
Gitlow v United States
6. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Mapp v Ohio
Lemon v Kurtzman
Texas v Johnson
NAACP v Alabama
7. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
NAACP v Alabama
Gitlow v United States
Mapp v Ohio
8. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Engel v Vitale
Palko v Connecticut
Korematsu v United States
Gideon v Wainwright
9. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Roth v United States
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Escobedo v Ilinois
10. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Near v Minnesota
Brown v Board of Education
Texas v Johnson
Harris v Forklift Service
11. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Harris v Forklift Service
Employment Division v Smith
Brown v Board of Education
Gideon v Wainwright
12. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Harris v Forklift Service
Engel v Vitale
Miller v California
Korematsu v United States
13. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Bowers v Hardwick
Plessy v Ferguson
Texas v Johnson
New York Times v Sullivan
14. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Lemon v Kurtzman
Schnek v United States
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
15. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Grutter v Bollinger
Lemon v Kurtzman
Brown v Board of Education
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
16. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Baker v Car
Schnek v United States
Grutter v Bollinger
Katz v United States
17. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Gideon v Wainwright
Gregg v Georgia
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Roe v Wade
18. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Buckley v. Valeo
Schnek v United States
Griswold v Connecticut
Gideon v Wainwright
19. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Buckley v. Valeo
Gideon v Wainwright
Korematsu v United States
Reno v ACLU
20. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Katz v United States
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Barron v Baltimore
Gideon v Wainwright
21. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Plessy v Ferguson
Roe v Wade
Reno v ACLU
22. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Bush v Gore
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Palko v Connecticut
23. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Grutter v Bollinger
Engel v Vitale
Wolf v Colorado
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
24. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Miller v California
Texas v Johnson
Schnek v United States
25. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
United States v Eichman
Korematsu v United States
Miranda v Arizona
Adarand v Pena
26. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Wolf v Colorado
Bowers v Hardwick
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Brown v Board of Education
27. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
NAACP v Alabama
Reno v ACLU
Plessy v Ferguson
Grutter v Bollinger
28. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
New York Times v Sullivan
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
29. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Miranda v Arizona
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Gregg v Georgia
30. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Harris v Forklift Service
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Buckley v. Valeo
Miller v California
31. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Baker v Car
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Roe v Wade
Escobedo v Ilinois
32. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Harris v Forklift Service
Near v Minnesota
Katz v United States
Adarand v Pena
33. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Gitlow v United States
Miller v California
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Plessy v Ferguson
34. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Gitlow v United States
Buckley v. Valeo
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Near v Minnesota
35. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Barron v Baltimore
Gideon v Wainwright
Roe v Wade
Reno v ACLU
36. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Bush v Gore
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Baker v Car
Lemon v Kurtzman
37. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Gitlow v United States
Buckley v. Valeo
Griswold v Connecticut
New York Times v Sullivan
38. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Casey v Planned Parenthood
NAACP v Alabama
Reno v ACLU
39. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Baker v Car
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Brown v Board of Education
Lemon v Kurtzman
40. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Adarand v Pena
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
41. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Texas v Johnson
Mapp v Ohio
Gregg v Georgia
Lemon v Kurtzman
42. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Escobedo v Ilinois
Engel v Vitale
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
United States v Eichman
43. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
NAACP v Alabama
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Korematsu v United States
Harris v Forklift Service
44. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Wolf v Colorado
Adarand v Pena
Bowers v Hardwick
Engel v Vitale
45. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Wisconsin v Yoder
Adarand v Pena
Baker v Car
Katz v United States
46. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Escobedo v Ilinois
Schnek v United States
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Brown v Board of Education