Test your basic knowledge |

Important Supreme Court Cases

Subject : law
Instructions:
  • Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval






2. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests






3. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.






4. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case






5. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.






6. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement






7. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw






8. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'






9. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution






10. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish






11. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.






12. Right to Counsel during Interrogations






13. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government






14. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990






15. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.






16. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor






17. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.






18. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give






19. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.






20. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.






21. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade






22. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.






23. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject






24. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)






25. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.






26. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.






27. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.






28. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)






29. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.






30. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against






31. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.






32. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr






33. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment






34. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.






35. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on






36. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment






37. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'






38. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place






39. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause






40. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights






41. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal






42. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference






43. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.






44. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired






45. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests






46. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.