SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Griswold v Connecticut
Baker v Car
Employment Division v Smith
Korematsu v United States
2. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Adarand v Pena
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Harris v Forklift Service
Korematsu v United States
3. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Griswold v Connecticut
Bush v Gore
Miller v California
4. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Schnek v United States
Buckley v. Valeo
Reno v ACLU
Employment Division v Smith
5. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Texas v Johnson
Bowers v Hardwick
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
6. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Engel v Vitale
Adarand v Pena
Reno v ACLU
Barron v Baltimore
7. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Roth v United States
Roe v Wade
Gideon v Wainwright
Tinker v Des Moines School District
8. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Korematsu v United States
Roth v United States
Texas v Johnson
Brown v Board of Education
9. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Roe v Wade
Lemon v Kurtzman
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Reno v ACLU
10. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Wisconsin v Yoder
Miller v California
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
11. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Wisconsin v Yoder
Reno v ACLU
Miller v California
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
12. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Schnek v United States
Bush v Gore
Mapp v Ohio
Barron v Baltimore
13. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Buckley v. Valeo
Katz v United States
Roe v Wade
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
14. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Korematsu v United States
Gitlow v United States
Wolf v Colorado
15. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
United States v Eichman
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Barron v Baltimore
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
16. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Employment Division v Smith
Griswold v Connecticut
United States v Eichman
Escobedo v Ilinois
17. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Baker v Car
Engel v Vitale
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Lemon v Kurtzman
18. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Wolf v Colorado
Harris v Forklift Service
New York Times v Sullivan
Roth v United States
19. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Engel v Vitale
Grutter v Bollinger
20. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Roth v United States
Gideon v Wainwright
Palko v Connecticut
Baker v Car
21. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Near v Minnesota
Barron v Baltimore
Gideon v Wainwright
Gitlow v United States
22. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
NAACP v Alabama
Miller v California
Escobedo v Ilinois
Griswold v Connecticut
23. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Grutter v Bollinger
Harris v Forklift Service
Escobedo v Ilinois
New York Times v Sullivan
24. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Near v Minnesota
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
25. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Near v Minnesota
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
26. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Griswold v Connecticut
Wisconsin v Yoder
27. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Wisconsin v Yoder
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Gideon v Wainwright
Plessy v Ferguson
28. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Mapp v Ohio
Miranda v Arizona
Tinker v Des Moines School District
NAACP v Alabama
29. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Gitlow v United States
Plessy v Ferguson
Griswold v Connecticut
Gregg v Georgia
30. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Gitlow v United States
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Gideon v Wainwright
Bush v Gore
31. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Griswold v Connecticut
Brown v Board of Education
Buckley v. Valeo
Miller v California
32. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Buckley v. Valeo
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Bowers v Hardwick
New York Times v Sullivan
33. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Reno v ACLU
Adarand v Pena
NAACP v Alabama
Engel v Vitale
34. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Gideon v Wainwright
Katz v United States
NAACP v Alabama
Baker v Car
35. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Escobedo v Ilinois
Lemon v Kurtzman
Employment Division v Smith
36. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Brown v Board of Education
Miranda v Arizona
Wisconsin v Yoder
Bush v Gore
37. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Grutter v Bollinger
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
38. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Korematsu v United States
Adarand v Pena
Schnek v United States
Tinker v Des Moines School District
39. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Adarand v Pena
Miller v California
New York Times v Sullivan
Wisconsin v Yoder
40. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Near v Minnesota
Mapp v Ohio
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Escobedo v Ilinois
41. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Buckley v. Valeo
Escobedo v Ilinois
Adarand v Pena
42. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
New York Times v Sullivan
Wisconsin v Yoder
Employment Division v Smith
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
43. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Katz v United States
Harris v Forklift Service
Engel v Vitale
Roe v Wade
44. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Near v Minnesota
Reno v ACLU
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
45. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Near v Minnesota
Miller v California
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Tinker v Des Moines School District
46. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Grutter v Bollinger
Palko v Connecticut
Korematsu v United States