SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Wolf v Colorado
Gideon v Wainwright
Near v Minnesota
Roe v Wade
2. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Miranda v Arizona
New York Times v Sullivan
Engel v Vitale
Gregg v Georgia
3. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Near v Minnesota
Texas v Johnson
Bowers v Hardwick
Barron v Baltimore
4. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Gregg v Georgia
Wisconsin v Yoder
New York Times v Sullivan
Mapp v Ohio
5. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Roe v Wade
Engel v Vitale
Employment Division v Smith
6. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Harris v Forklift Service
Palko v Connecticut
Griswold v Connecticut
NAACP v Alabama
7. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Baker v Car
New York Times v Sullivan
NAACP v Alabama
Brown v Board of Education
8. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Wisconsin v Yoder
Plessy v Ferguson
Barron v Baltimore
Roth v United States
9. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Schnek v United States
Gregg v Georgia
Employment Division v Smith
NAACP v Alabama
10. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Baker v Car
Schnek v United States
Wisconsin v Yoder
Brown v Board of Education
11. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Grutter v Bollinger
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Plessy v Ferguson
12. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Lemon v Kurtzman
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Texas v Johnson
Employment Division v Smith
13. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Adarand v Pena
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Palko v Connecticut
14. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Reno v ACLU
Engel v Vitale
Gitlow v United States
United States v Eichman
15. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Escobedo v Ilinois
Palko v Connecticut
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Baker v Car
16. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Palko v Connecticut
New York Times v Sullivan
Korematsu v United States
Bush v Gore
17. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Plessy v Ferguson
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Adarand v Pena
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
18. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Wolf v Colorado
Griswold v Connecticut
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Harris v Forklift Service
19. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Griswold v Connecticut
Escobedo v Ilinois
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Gideon v Wainwright
20. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Miller v California
Bush v Gore
21. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Texas v Johnson
Miller v California
Near v Minnesota
Lemon v Kurtzman
22. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Katz v United States
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Roth v United States
Engel v Vitale
23. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
United States v Eichman
Adarand v Pena
Buckley v. Valeo
Grutter v Bollinger
24. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Palko v Connecticut
Katz v United States
New York Times v Sullivan
25. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Texas v Johnson
Roth v United States
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Wolf v Colorado
26. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
United States v Eichman
Escobedo v Ilinois
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
27. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Gregg v Georgia
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Buckley v. Valeo
Mapp v Ohio
28. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Bush v Gore
Engel v Vitale
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
29. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Bush v Gore
NAACP v Alabama
Bowers v Hardwick
Wisconsin v Yoder
30. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Bush v Gore
Engel v Vitale
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Texas v Johnson
31. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Engel v Vitale
Palko v Connecticut
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Buckley v. Valeo
32. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Gregg v Georgia
United States v Eichman
Buckley v. Valeo
Grutter v Bollinger
33. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Bush v Gore
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Engel v Vitale
Miller v California
34. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Mapp v Ohio
Lemon v Kurtzman
35. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Grutter v Bollinger
Bowers v Hardwick
NAACP v Alabama
36. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Grutter v Bollinger
NAACP v Alabama
Roe v Wade
37. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Gregg v Georgia
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Schnek v United States
Reno v ACLU
38. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Wolf v Colorado
Griswold v Connecticut
New York Times v Sullivan
Katz v United States
39. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Bush v Gore
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Roth v United States
40. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Bowers v Hardwick
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Griswold v Connecticut
Roth v United States
41. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Buckley v. Valeo
Griswold v Connecticut
NAACP v Alabama
Tinker v Des Moines School District
42. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Harris v Forklift Service
Brown v Board of Education
Near v Minnesota
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
43. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Gitlow v United States
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Griswold v Connecticut
44. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
NAACP v Alabama
Harris v Forklift Service
Adarand v Pena
Katz v United States
45. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Employment Division v Smith
Miranda v Arizona
Bowers v Hardwick
Brown v Board of Education
46. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Wolf v Colorado
Schnek v United States
Brown v Board of Education
Webster v Health Reproductive Service