SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Bowers v Hardwick
Katz v United States
Gideon v Wainwright
NAACP v Alabama
2. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Mapp v Ohio
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Miranda v Arizona
3. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Harris v Forklift Service
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Lemon v Kurtzman
Korematsu v United States
4. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Korematsu v United States
Roe v Wade
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Katz v United States
5. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Bush v Gore
Baker v Car
Near v Minnesota
Gregg v Georgia
6. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Employment Division v Smith
Mapp v Ohio
Roe v Wade
Baker v Car
7. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Griswold v Connecticut
Miller v California
Barron v Baltimore
Casey v Planned Parenthood
8. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Barron v Baltimore
Miranda v Arizona
Griswold v Connecticut
United States v Eichman
9. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Harris v Forklift Service
Wisconsin v Yoder
Korematsu v United States
Miranda v Arizona
10. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Gregg v Georgia
Near v Minnesota
Roth v United States
Roe v Wade
11. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Escobedo v Ilinois
Texas v Johnson
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
12. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Schnek v United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Miranda v Arizona
Roth v United States
13. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Roe v Wade
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Gideon v Wainwright
Katz v United States
14. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Texas v Johnson
Grutter v Bollinger
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Bowers v Hardwick
15. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
New York Times v Sullivan
Adarand v Pena
Katz v United States
Tinker v Des Moines School District
16. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Gitlow v United States
Near v Minnesota
Gregg v Georgia
Brown v Board of Education
17. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Escobedo v Ilinois
Bush v Gore
Baker v Car
Brown v Board of Education
18. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Miller v California
Barron v Baltimore
New York Times v Sullivan
Korematsu v United States
19. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
New York Times v Sullivan
Buckley v. Valeo
Gregg v Georgia
20. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Adarand v Pena
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Baker v Car
Texas v Johnson
21. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
NAACP v Alabama
Barron v Baltimore
Lemon v Kurtzman
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
22. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
NAACP v Alabama
Baker v Car
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Buckley v. Valeo
23. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Mapp v Ohio
Gitlow v United States
Roe v Wade
24. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
NAACP v Alabama
Brown v Board of Education
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Wolf v Colorado
25. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Adarand v Pena
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Engel v Vitale
26. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Wisconsin v Yoder
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Baker v Car
United States v Eichman
27. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Gregg v Georgia
Plessy v Ferguson
Barron v Baltimore
28. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Wolf v Colorado
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Roth v United States
29. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Buckley v. Valeo
Wisconsin v Yoder
Brown v Board of Education
30. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Roe v Wade
31. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Palko v Connecticut
Engel v Vitale
Bush v Gore
NAACP v Alabama
32. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
United States v Eichman
Bush v Gore
Gregg v Georgia
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
33. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Mapp v Ohio
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Bowers v Hardwick
34. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Gregg v Georgia
Roth v United States
Bowers v Hardwick
Engel v Vitale
35. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Reno v ACLU
Gregg v Georgia
NAACP v Alabama
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
36. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Engel v Vitale
Barron v Baltimore
Griswold v Connecticut
37. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Miller v California
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Employment Division v Smith
Mapp v Ohio
38. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Wisconsin v Yoder
Engel v Vitale
Korematsu v United States
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
39. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Harris v Forklift Service
Buckley v. Valeo
Griswold v Connecticut
Baker v Car
40. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Roth v United States
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Employment Division v Smith
Katz v United States
41. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Plessy v Ferguson
Brown v Board of Education
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
42. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Wolf v Colorado
Adarand v Pena
Escobedo v Ilinois
Buckley v. Valeo
43. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Brown v Board of Education
Harris v Forklift Service
Plessy v Ferguson
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
44. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Casey v Planned Parenthood
United States v Eichman
Texas v Johnson
Tinker v Des Moines School District
45. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Mapp v Ohio
Adarand v Pena
Bush v Gore
Korematsu v United States
46. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Reno v ACLU
Adarand v Pena
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Plessy v Ferguson