SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Bush v Gore
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Gregg v Georgia
Korematsu v United States
2. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Bowers v Hardwick
Wolf v Colorado
Barron v Baltimore
New York Times v Sullivan
3. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Gitlow v United States
Mapp v Ohio
Wisconsin v Yoder
Bowers v Hardwick
4. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Lemon v Kurtzman
Wisconsin v Yoder
Brown v Board of Education
Harris v Forklift Service
5. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Wolf v Colorado
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Baker v Car
Escobedo v Ilinois
6. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Near v Minnesota
Wisconsin v Yoder
Adarand v Pena
Palko v Connecticut
7. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Engel v Vitale
NAACP v Alabama
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Harris v Forklift Service
8. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Employment Division v Smith
Grutter v Bollinger
New York Times v Sullivan
Roe v Wade
9. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Miller v California
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Korematsu v United States
10. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Schnek v United States
Gideon v Wainwright
Near v Minnesota
11. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Employment Division v Smith
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Palko v Connecticut
Schnek v United States
12. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Buckley v. Valeo
Miranda v Arizona
13. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Buckley v. Valeo
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
New York Times v Sullivan
Plessy v Ferguson
14. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Roe v Wade
Brown v Board of Education
United States v Eichman
Engel v Vitale
15. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Roth v United States
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Wolf v Colorado
16. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Wisconsin v Yoder
Roth v United States
NAACP v Alabama
Baker v Car
17. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Grutter v Bollinger
Bush v Gore
Lemon v Kurtzman
18. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
New York Times v Sullivan
NAACP v Alabama
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Harris v Forklift Service
19. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Bowers v Hardwick
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Miranda v Arizona
Near v Minnesota
20. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Korematsu v United States
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Reno v ACLU
21. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Gideon v Wainwright
Near v Minnesota
Buckley v. Valeo
Tinker v Des Moines School District
22. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Schnek v United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Barron v Baltimore
23. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Katz v United States
Miranda v Arizona
Griswold v Connecticut
Brown v Board of Education
24. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Casey v Planned Parenthood
NAACP v Alabama
Miller v California
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
25. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Wolf v Colorado
Mapp v Ohio
Wisconsin v Yoder
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
26. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Engel v Vitale
Roth v United States
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
New York Times v Sullivan
27. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Mapp v Ohio
Adarand v Pena
Texas v Johnson
Near v Minnesota
28. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Schnek v United States
Roe v Wade
Wisconsin v Yoder
Bush v Gore
29. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Employment Division v Smith
Gitlow v United States
Bowers v Hardwick
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
30. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Escobedo v Ilinois
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Employment Division v Smith
31. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Reno v ACLU
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Katz v United States
Bush v Gore
32. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Palko v Connecticut
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Reno v ACLU
33. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Wisconsin v Yoder
Buckley v. Valeo
34. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Gitlow v United States
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
United States v Eichman
Adarand v Pena
35. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Brown v Board of Education
Gregg v Georgia
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Engel v Vitale
36. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Griswold v Connecticut
Grutter v Bollinger
Brown v Board of Education
Schnek v United States
37. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
United States v Eichman
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Mapp v Ohio
Roth v United States
38. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Baker v Car
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Buckley v. Valeo
Brown v Board of Education
39. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Miranda v Arizona
Buckley v. Valeo
Schnek v United States
Escobedo v Ilinois
40. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
New York Times v Sullivan
Gitlow v United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Engel v Vitale
41. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Harris v Forklift Service
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Buckley v. Valeo
Baker v Car
42. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Gregg v Georgia
Korematsu v United States
Engel v Vitale
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
43. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Harris v Forklift Service
Wolf v Colorado
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
44. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Bush v Gore
Bowers v Hardwick
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Brown v Board of Education
45. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Engel v Vitale
Bowers v Hardwick
Griswold v Connecticut
Reno v ACLU
46. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
New York Times v Sullivan
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Miller v California
Baker v Car