SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Harris v Forklift Service
Brown v Board of Education
Near v Minnesota
Grutter v Bollinger
2. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Escobedo v Ilinois
Adarand v Pena
Korematsu v United States
Mapp v Ohio
3. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Baker v Car
Gregg v Georgia
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
4. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Roth v United States
Employment Division v Smith
Grutter v Bollinger
Lemon v Kurtzman
5. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Mapp v Ohio
Griswold v Connecticut
NAACP v Alabama
Bush v Gore
6. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Roe v Wade
Baker v Car
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Engel v Vitale
7. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
United States v Eichman
Escobedo v Ilinois
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
8. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Texas v Johnson
Wisconsin v Yoder
New York Times v Sullivan
Schnek v United States
9. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Katz v United States
Texas v Johnson
10. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Near v Minnesota
NAACP v Alabama
Miller v California
Grutter v Bollinger
11. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Katz v United States
Roth v United States
United States v Eichman
Adarand v Pena
12. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Gideon v Wainwright
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Roth v United States
Wisconsin v Yoder
13. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Bowers v Hardwick
Palko v Connecticut
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
14. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Bowers v Hardwick
New York Times v Sullivan
Adarand v Pena
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
15. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Bush v Gore
Adarand v Pena
Reno v ACLU
16. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Near v Minnesota
Texas v Johnson
Harris v Forklift Service
Grutter v Bollinger
17. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Roe v Wade
Wolf v Colorado
Harris v Forklift Service
Palko v Connecticut
18. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
New York Times v Sullivan
Mapp v Ohio
Barron v Baltimore
19. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Gideon v Wainwright
United States v Eichman
Plessy v Ferguson
Roe v Wade
20. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Gitlow v United States
Adarand v Pena
21. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Plessy v Ferguson
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Bowers v Hardwick
Wisconsin v Yoder
22. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Escobedo v Ilinois
United States v Eichman
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
23. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Barron v Baltimore
Gregg v Georgia
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Engel v Vitale
24. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Griswold v Connecticut
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Texas v Johnson
New York Times v Sullivan
25. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
United States v Eichman
Barron v Baltimore
Brown v Board of Education
Baker v Car
26. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Lemon v Kurtzman
Adarand v Pena
Miranda v Arizona
27. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Reno v ACLU
Employment Division v Smith
Grutter v Bollinger
Texas v Johnson
28. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
United States v Eichman
Engel v Vitale
Mapp v Ohio
Texas v Johnson
29. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Buckley v. Valeo
Reno v ACLU
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Plessy v Ferguson
30. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Mapp v Ohio
Gregg v Georgia
Reno v ACLU
Engel v Vitale
31. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
New York Times v Sullivan
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
NAACP v Alabama
Miranda v Arizona
32. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
New York Times v Sullivan
United States v Eichman
Engel v Vitale
Bush v Gore
33. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Near v Minnesota
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Miranda v Arizona
Plessy v Ferguson
34. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Roe v Wade
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Wisconsin v Yoder
NAACP v Alabama
35. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Bowers v Hardwick
New York Times v Sullivan
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Casey v Planned Parenthood
36. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Gideon v Wainwright
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Palko v Connecticut
Plessy v Ferguson
37. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Roe v Wade
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Buckley v. Valeo
38. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Reno v ACLU
Brown v Board of Education
Griswold v Connecticut
Schnek v United States
39. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
United States v Eichman
Palko v Connecticut
Adarand v Pena
Grutter v Bollinger
40. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Plessy v Ferguson
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Gitlow v United States
41. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
NAACP v Alabama
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
United States v Eichman
42. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Wolf v Colorado
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Palko v Connecticut
Gitlow v United States
43. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Barron v Baltimore
Reno v ACLU
New York Times v Sullivan
44. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Employment Division v Smith
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Grutter v Bollinger
Plessy v Ferguson
45. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Katz v United States
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Reno v ACLU
Grutter v Bollinger
46. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Baker v Car
Gregg v Georgia
Texas v Johnson
Escobedo v Ilinois