SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Brown v Board of Education
Baker v Car
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Gregg v Georgia
2. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Employment Division v Smith
Buckley v. Valeo
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
3. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Bush v Gore
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Plessy v Ferguson
Lemon v Kurtzman
4. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Bowers v Hardwick
Katz v United States
Gregg v Georgia
5. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Engel v Vitale
Near v Minnesota
Lemon v Kurtzman
Buckley v. Valeo
6. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Palko v Connecticut
Wisconsin v Yoder
Wolf v Colorado
Gideon v Wainwright
7. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Plessy v Ferguson
Escobedo v Ilinois
Schnek v United States
Barron v Baltimore
8. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Gregg v Georgia
Miranda v Arizona
Gitlow v United States
Bush v Gore
9. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Miller v California
Employment Division v Smith
Reno v ACLU
Palko v Connecticut
10. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Buckley v. Valeo
Gideon v Wainwright
Lemon v Kurtzman
Miranda v Arizona
11. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Plessy v Ferguson
Employment Division v Smith
Gitlow v United States
Reno v ACLU
12. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Near v Minnesota
Baker v Car
Roth v United States
NAACP v Alabama
13. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Grutter v Bollinger
Griswold v Connecticut
Buckley v. Valeo
Mapp v Ohio
14. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Bowers v Hardwick
Texas v Johnson
Palko v Connecticut
Roe v Wade
15. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Brown v Board of Education
Plessy v Ferguson
United States v Eichman
New York Times v Sullivan
16. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Texas v Johnson
Mapp v Ohio
17. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Miller v California
Escobedo v Ilinois
Plessy v Ferguson
Wisconsin v Yoder
18. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Mapp v Ohio
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Griswold v Connecticut
19. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Employment Division v Smith
20. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Barron v Baltimore
Texas v Johnson
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Harris v Forklift Service
21. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Roth v United States
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Adarand v Pena
Bowers v Hardwick
22. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Gideon v Wainwright
Plessy v Ferguson
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Gregg v Georgia
23. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Wisconsin v Yoder
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Gitlow v United States
Tinker v Des Moines School District
24. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Wisconsin v Yoder
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
25. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Adarand v Pena
Korematsu v United States
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Roth v United States
26. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Gitlow v United States
Griswold v Connecticut
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
27. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Bush v Gore
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Mapp v Ohio
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
28. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Wisconsin v Yoder
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Bush v Gore
Bowers v Hardwick
29. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Adarand v Pena
Reno v ACLU
Mapp v Ohio
Korematsu v United States
30. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Baker v Car
Schnek v United States
NAACP v Alabama
Plessy v Ferguson
31. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Brown v Board of Education
Buckley v. Valeo
Bush v Gore
Wolf v Colorado
32. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
New York Times v Sullivan
Roth v United States
Mapp v Ohio
Grutter v Bollinger
33. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Bush v Gore
Harris v Forklift Service
Gitlow v United States
Brown v Board of Education
34. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Bush v Gore
Roe v Wade
Harris v Forklift Service
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
35. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Wisconsin v Yoder
Lemon v Kurtzman
Buckley v. Valeo
Plessy v Ferguson
36. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Brown v Board of Education
Schnek v United States
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Engel v Vitale
37. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
NAACP v Alabama
Texas v Johnson
United States v Eichman
Casey v Planned Parenthood
38. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Gitlow v United States
Harris v Forklift Service
New York Times v Sullivan
39. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
United States v Eichman
Roe v Wade
Korematsu v United States
Employment Division v Smith
40. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Katz v United States
Korematsu v United States
Escobedo v Ilinois
Roth v United States
41. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Wisconsin v Yoder
Miranda v Arizona
Mapp v Ohio
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
42. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Bowers v Hardwick
United States v Eichman
43. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Engel v Vitale
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Texas v Johnson
Miller v California
44. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Baker v Car
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Katz v United States
Gregg v Georgia
45. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Gitlow v United States
Gregg v Georgia
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
46. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Miranda v Arizona
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Gideon v Wainwright
Lemon v Kurtzman