SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Important Supreme Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
law
Instructions:
Answer 46 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Less blatant gerrymandering and redistricting was subject to judicial approval
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Baker v Car
Plessy v Ferguson
Casey v Planned Parenthood
2. 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20 -000 to each survivor.
Korematsu v United States
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Wisconsin v Yoder
Bowers v Hardwick
3. The USSC uphold MO law and insists that women have a right to abortion but state should not pay 'elective surgery'
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Korematsu v United States
Lemon v Kurtzman
Roe v Wade
4. A 1995 Supreme Court decision holding that federal programs that classify people by race - even for an ostensibly benign purpose such as expanding opportunities for minorities - should be presumed to be unconstitutional.
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Miranda v Arizona
Adarand v Pena
Texas v Johnson
5. In this case - a gay man from Georgia charged with committing sodomy in his own home with a consenting adult. The court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly grant the right for homosexuals to practice their lifestyle and that laws against
Wisconsin v Yoder
Bowers v Hardwick
Wolf v Colorado
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
6. Student led - student initiated prayer at high school football games violates the Establishment Clause
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Wisconsin v Yoder
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Korematsu v United States
7. (1942) The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect 'fighting words'
Plessy v Ferguson
Katz v United States
Miranda v Arizona
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
8. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Baker v Car
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Lemon v Kurtzman
Roe v Wade
9. Using the commerce clause as justification for this federal government ruling - aid that places of public acccommodation cannot pick and choose guests
Plessy v Ferguson
Palko v Connecticut
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Gideon v Wainwright
10. The 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
Gitlow v United States
Griswold v Connecticut
Engel v Vitale
Bush v Gore
11. Court found that segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection clause 'separate but equal' has no place
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Brown v Board of Education
Adarand v Pena
United States v Eichman
12. Married couple wanted to get contraceptives; struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives; established the right of privacy through the 4th and 9th amendment
Griswold v Connecticut
Plessy v Ferguson
Wisconsin v Yoder
Employment Division v Smith
13. Right to Counsel during Interrogations
Buckley v. Valeo
Miranda v Arizona
Escobedo v Ilinois
Mapp v Ohio
14. Upheld the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Miranda v Arizona
Buckley v. Valeo
Gregg v Georgia
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
15. Husband permission for abortion is unconstitutional (1992)
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Bush v Gore
Casey v Planned Parenthood
Gitlow v United States
16. This case ruled in favor of Bush by saying that recounting the votes in certain counties of Florida was unconstitutional because of equal protection of the law; Gore's wish to make the process as simple and painless as possible backfired
Bush v Gore
Korematsu v United States
Lemon v Kurtzman
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
17. Expanded the protection of the Fourth Amendment to include conversations - not just things.
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Katz v United States
United States v Eichman
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
18. Courts held while that affirmative action systems are constitutional - a quota system based on race is unconstitutional.
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Near v Minnesota
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
19. The 1931 Supreme Court decision holding that the first amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
Gregg v Georgia
Bush v Gore
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Near v Minnesota
20. Court held that intentional infliction of emotional distress was permissible First Amendment free speech- so long as such speech was about a public official (figure) - and could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Gregg v Georgia
Near v Minnesota
Reno v ACLU
21. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld federal limits on campaign contributions and ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech. The court also stated candidates can give
Mapp v Ohio
Griswold v Connecticut
Buckley v. Valeo
Miranda v Arizona
22. The 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the bill of rights restrained only the national government - not the states and cities.
Escobedo v Ilinois
Miller v California
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Barron v Baltimore
23. Said that protection against double jeopardy is not guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Reno v ACLU
Palko v Connecticut
Escobedo v Ilinois
24. 1969 - The First Amendment - as applied through the Fourteenth - did not permit a public school to punish a student for wearing a black armband as an anti-war protest - absent any evidence that the rule was necessary to avoid substantial interference
Employment Division v Smith
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Escobedo v Ilinois
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
25. Determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote - even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states have the power to accommodate otherw
Brown v Board of Education
Baker v Car
Roth v United States
Employment Division v Smith
26. 1964; established guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so - individuals must prove that the defamatory statements were made w/ 'actual malice' and reckless disregard for the tr
Employment Division v Smith
New York Times v Sullivan
Baker v Car
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
27. The Supreme Court held that the 1996 Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional - since it was overly broad and vague in its regulation of speech on the internet - and it attempted to regulate indecent speech - which is protected.
Hustler Magazine v Falwell
Schnek v United States
Reno v ACLU
Escobedo v Ilinois
28. 1925 court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech are 'fundamental personal rights protected by the due process clause of the 14Th amendment from impairment by the states as well as the federal government
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Roe v Wade
Gitlow v United States
Miller v California
29. 1978 - Nazi group wanted to mark in neighborhood with high percentage of Jewish residents; village tried to prevent march by passing ordinances on parades that targeted the nazis; Illinois Supreme Court said march could not be forbidden because no on
Texas v Johnson
Village of Skokie v National Socialist Party
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Tinker v Des Moines School District
30. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Wolf v Colorado
Reno v ACLU
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Barron v Baltimore
31. Declared Flag Protection Act - which made flag-burning illegal - unconstitutional - 1990
Near v Minnesota
United States v Eichman
Roe v Wade
Wolf v Colorado
32. A landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case - the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases for defendants unable to affor
Texas v Johnson
Engel v Vitale
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Gideon v Wainwright
33. A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a 'prurient interest' and being 'patently offensive' and lacking in value.
Buckley v. Valeo
Miller v California
Wolf v Colorado
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
34. First Amendment right of expressive association. BSA is allowed to dismiss gay leaders because it is a private institution
Gideon v Wainwright
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Katz v United States
Casey v Planned Parenthood
35. Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health or unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy establish
Roe v Wade
Texas v Johnson
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Mapp v Ohio
36. Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Buckley v. Valeo
Miranda v Arizona
Lemon v Kurtzman
Wisconsin v Yoder
37. Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
Mapp v Ohio
Griswold v Connecticut
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
38. A 1896 Supreme Court decision which legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
Buckley v. Valeo
Reno v ACLU
Plessy v Ferguson
Palko v Connecticut
39. The result of this trial was the Supreme Court ruling that Congress could limit free speech - particularly during wartime - if such speech presented 'a clear and present danger' to national interests
Barron v Baltimore
Gregg v Georgia
Harris v Forklift Service
Schnek v United States
40. Sexual harassment not protected by First Amendment Rights
Santa Fe Independant School District v Doe
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
Harris v Forklift Service
Brown v Board of Education
41. The supreme court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.
Buckley v. Valeo
Webster v Health Reproductive Service
Wolf v Colorado
NAACP v Alabama
42. Busing Students to promote intergration is constitutional.
Miller v California
Gitlow v United States
Brown v Board of Education
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklingberg
43. Affirmative action case (lost) ; race could be used as a factor in admissions as long as there was no point system and race was not a major factor; upheld Bakke case
Palko v Connecticut
NAACP v Alabama
Buckley v. Valeo
Grutter v Bollinger
44. A 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
Gideon v Wainwright
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Roth v United States
Boy Scouts of America v Dale
45. A 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
Harris v Forklift Service
Texas v Johnson
Tinker v Des Moines School District
Katz v United States
46. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Harris v Forklift Service
Near v Minnesota
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Wisconsin v Yoder