SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
Enumerative Argument
Sufficient Condition
Necessary Condition
Confidence Level
2. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Confidence Level
Inductive Argument
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Representative Sample
3. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
Target Group
Representative Sample
analogical induction
Analogy
4. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
Relevant Property
Enumerative Argument
Random Sample
Target Group
5. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
Target Group
Margin of Error
Enumerative Argument
Inference to the best explanation
6. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
Enumerative Argument
Necessary Condition
Biased Sample
Inductive Argument
7. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
Target Group
Sample
Method of Concomitant Variation
Enumerative Argument
8. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Confidence Level
Biased Sample
Opinion polls
Relevant Property
9. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Enumerative Argument
Random Sample
Method of Concomitant Variation
Sample
10. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
Method of Difference
Sample
Biased Sample
Representative Sample
11. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
Target Group
Sufficient Condition
hasty generalization
Necessary Condition
12. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
Opinion polls
Relevant Property
hasty generalization
Inductive Argument
13. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
Sample
Necessary Condition
Analogy
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
14. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
Relevant Property
Method of Difference
Inference to the best explanation
Opinion polls
15. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
Inference to the best explanation
Necessary Condition
Margin of Error
hasty generalization
16. A statement about the cause of things.
Confidence Level
Causal claim
causal argument
Opinion polls
17. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
Opinion polls
Enumerative Argument
causal argument
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
18. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
Sufficient Condition
Target Group
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Method of Agreement
19. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
Target Group
causal argument
Analogy
Method of Concomitant Variation
20. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
analogical induction
Method of Agreement
causal argument
Method of Difference
21. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
Random Sample
Inference to the best explanation
Sufficient Condition
Opinion polls
22. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Causal claim
Inductive Argument
Biased Sample
Random Sample
23. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Method of Difference
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Causal claim
Analogy
24. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
Target Group
Representative Sample
Random Sample
Sample