SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
hasty generalization
Margin of Error
Relevant Property
2. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
Analogy
Opinion polls
Enumerative Argument
Causal claim
3. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
Random Sample
causal argument
Enumerative Argument
Inference to the best explanation
4. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
Method of Agreement
Method of Concomitant Variation
analogical induction
Sample
5. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
Sample
Relevant Property
Confidence Level
causal argument
6. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Margin of Error
Inference to the best explanation
Random Sample
causal argument
7. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
Target Group
analogical induction
Method of Agreement
Confidence Level
8. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
Sample
Target Group
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
analogical induction
9. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
hasty generalization
Representative Sample
Confidence Level
Method of Difference
10. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
Necessary Condition
hasty generalization
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Method of Difference
11. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
analogical induction
Necessary Condition
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Confidence Level
12. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Target Group
Opinion polls
causal argument
Analogy
13. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
Method of Difference
Target Group
Enumerative Argument
Confidence Level
14. A statement about the cause of things.
hasty generalization
causal argument
Causal claim
Representative Sample
15. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
analogical induction
Sample
Sufficient Condition
Random Sample
16. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
hasty generalization
Inference to the best explanation
Margin of Error
Sufficient Condition
17. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Necessary Condition
Inductive Argument
Analogy
Relevant Property
18. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
Sufficient Condition
Inference to the best explanation
Margin of Error
analogical induction
19. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
Representative Sample
Necessary Condition
Inductive Argument
Method of Difference
20. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
hasty generalization
Margin of Error
Sufficient Condition
Biased Sample
21. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Opinion polls
Inductive Argument
Confidence Level
Biased Sample
22. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Representative Sample
Enumerative Argument
Method of Agreement
23. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
hasty generalization
Analogy
Relevant Property
Target Group
24. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
Relevant Property
Inductive Argument
Biased Sample
Sufficient Condition