SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
Relevant Property
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
hasty generalization
Target Group
2. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
analogical induction
Necessary Condition
Representative Sample
Sufficient Condition
3. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Method of Agreement
Biased Sample
Inductive Argument
Random Sample
4. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
Representative Sample
Method of Difference
Method of Agreement
analogical induction
5. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Enumerative Argument
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Opinion polls
Inductive Argument
6. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
Method of Concomitant Variation
analogical induction
Inductive Argument
Necessary Condition
7. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Enumerative Argument
Biased Sample
Inductive Argument
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
8. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
Necessary Condition
Relevant Property
Sufficient Condition
Inference to the best explanation
9. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Necessary Condition
Sufficient Condition
Analogy
10. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
Target Group
Random Sample
causal argument
Method of Agreement
11. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
Sample
causal argument
Representative Sample
Biased Sample
12. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Sufficient Condition
Inference to the best explanation
Confidence Level
Margin of Error
13. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
Relevant Property
analogical induction
Confidence Level
Opinion polls
14. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
Causal claim
Sufficient Condition
Sample
Enumerative Argument
15. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
analogical induction
Enumerative Argument
Analogy
Relevant Property
16. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
Inductive Argument
Margin of Error
Method of Concomitant Variation
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
17. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
Method of Agreement
Method of Difference
hasty generalization
Method of Concomitant Variation
18. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
Method of Difference
Random Sample
Method of Concomitant Variation
Sample
19. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
Random Sample
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Method of Difference
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
20. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
Inductive Argument
Relevant Property
Sufficient Condition
Confidence Level
21. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
Representative Sample
hasty generalization
Margin of Error
Opinion polls
22. A statement about the cause of things.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Margin of Error
Method of Agreement
Causal claim
23. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
Inference to the best explanation
Sample
Enumerative Argument
analogical induction
24. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Analogy
Random Sample
Method of Difference
Causal claim