SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A statement about the cause of things.
Causal claim
Random Sample
Relevant Property
Analogy
2. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
Margin of Error
Biased Sample
Method of Concomitant Variation
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
3. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
Sufficient Condition
Opinion polls
Sample
analogical induction
4. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
causal argument
Method of Concomitant Variation
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Relevant Property
5. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
Confidence Level
Target Group
Representative Sample
Opinion polls
6. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Method of Agreement
Confidence Level
hasty generalization
Target Group
7. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Representative Sample
Inductive Argument
Necessary Condition
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
8. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Analogy
analogical induction
Margin of Error
Relevant Property
9. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
Biased Sample
Method of Concomitant Variation
Inductive Argument
Target Group
10. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
causal argument
Method of Difference
Relevant Property
Sample
11. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Biased Sample
Method of Difference
Sample
Representative Sample
12. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
Target Group
Sample
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Causal claim
13. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
Necessary Condition
Opinion polls
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Relevant Property
14. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
hasty generalization
Method of Concomitant Variation
analogical induction
Enumerative Argument
15. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Biased Sample
Random Sample
Method of Difference
Relevant Property
16. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
Method of Concomitant Variation
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Method of Agreement
hasty generalization
17. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
Inductive Argument
Inference to the best explanation
Target Group
Method of Difference
18. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
Representative Sample
hasty generalization
Method of Agreement
Enumerative Argument
19. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
Inference to the best explanation
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Representative Sample
Method of Difference
20. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
Opinion polls
Sample
Method of Difference
Necessary Condition
21. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
causal argument
Margin of Error
Biased Sample
Opinion polls
22. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
Method of Difference
Margin of Error
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Biased Sample
23. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
Target Group
Margin of Error
Opinion polls
Method of Agreement
24. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
Necessary Condition
hasty generalization
Confidence Level
Sample