SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
Sample
Inference to the best explanation
hasty generalization
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
2. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
Inductive Argument
Method of Difference
Margin of Error
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
3. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
Necessary Condition
Method of Agreement
Method of Concomitant Variation
Relevant Property
4. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
Representative Sample
hasty generalization
Method of Agreement
Causal claim
5. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Inference to the best explanation
Inductive Argument
Sample
Representative Sample
6. A statement about the cause of things.
Causal claim
hasty generalization
Sample
Method of Agreement
7. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
causal argument
Method of Agreement
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Biased Sample
8. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
Inference to the best explanation
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Biased Sample
Method of Agreement
9. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Enumerative Argument
analogical induction
Inference to the best explanation
10. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
Method of Agreement
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Analogy
Necessary Condition
11. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
Necessary Condition
Sufficient Condition
Causal claim
Enumerative Argument
12. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Target Group
Random Sample
Causal claim
Biased Sample
13. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
Target Group
Sufficient Condition
Inference to the best explanation
analogical induction
14. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Confidence Level
Enumerative Argument
Biased Sample
Random Sample
15. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Sample
Target Group
Necessary Condition
16. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Margin of Error
Opinion polls
causal argument
Random Sample
17. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
hasty generalization
Margin of Error
Method of Concomitant Variation
Random Sample
18. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
Enumerative Argument
analogical induction
Target Group
Relevant Property
19. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Random Sample
Biased Sample
Opinion polls
20. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
Necessary Condition
Enumerative Argument
Biased Sample
Relevant Property
21. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
Sufficient Condition
Enumerative Argument
Inductive Argument
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
22. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Inference to the best explanation
Analogy
Sample
Causal claim
23. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
Sufficient Condition
Representative Sample
Inference to the best explanation
causal argument
24. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
Causal claim
Analogy
Target Group
Representative Sample