SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
Confidence Level
Inductive Argument
Method of Agreement
Representative Sample
2. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
Analogy
Sample
Relevant Property
Method of Agreement
3. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
analogical induction
Margin of Error
Method of Agreement
Inference to the best explanation
4. A statement about the cause of things.
Margin of Error
hasty generalization
causal argument
Causal claim
5. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Method of Agreement
Target Group
Analogy
Inductive Argument
6. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Necessary Condition
Representative Sample
Margin of Error
7. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
Analogy
Relevant Property
Confidence Level
Method of Agreement
8. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Sufficient Condition
Necessary Condition
Biased Sample
Target Group
9. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
Analogy
Random Sample
Method of Agreement
hasty generalization
10. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
causal argument
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Inference to the best explanation
Relevant Property
11. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Sample
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Inductive Argument
Representative Sample
12. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Target Group
Confidence Level
Opinion polls
13. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
Enumerative Argument
Causal claim
Method of Difference
hasty generalization
14. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Confidence Level
Analogy
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Representative Sample
15. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
causal argument
Analogy
Sufficient Condition
16. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
causal argument
Margin of Error
Method of Concomitant Variation
17. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Random Sample
Confidence Level
Method of Concomitant Variation
hasty generalization
18. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
Inductive Argument
Method of Difference
Opinion polls
Sample
19. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
causal argument
Method of Agreement
Inductive Argument
Sample
20. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Random Sample
causal argument
21. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
Necessary Condition
Method of Difference
Opinion polls
Sufficient Condition
22. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
causal argument
hasty generalization
Enumerative Argument
Causal claim
23. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
Method of Difference
Sample
Sufficient Condition
Margin of Error
24. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
Target Group
analogical induction
Inductive Argument
Margin of Error