SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Biased Sample
Target Group
Sufficient Condition
Random Sample
2. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
Inference to the best explanation
Method of Concomitant Variation
Method of Agreement
Confidence Level
3. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
Target Group
Representative Sample
hasty generalization
Random Sample
4. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
hasty generalization
Biased Sample
Representative Sample
Confidence Level
5. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
Representative Sample
Sufficient Condition
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Inference to the best explanation
6. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
Causal claim
Method of Concomitant Variation
Target Group
Margin of Error
7. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Opinion polls
Random Sample
hasty generalization
Inductive Argument
8. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Method of Difference
Inference to the best explanation
Method of Agreement
9. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Inductive Argument
Opinion polls
Random Sample
analogical induction
10. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
analogical induction
Necessary Condition
Representative Sample
Sufficient Condition
11. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
Target Group
Method of Agreement
Inference to the best explanation
Analogy
12. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Method of Agreement
Causal claim
Necessary Condition
13. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Target Group
causal argument
Necessary Condition
14. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Method of Agreement
Analogy
hasty generalization
analogical induction
15. A statement about the cause of things.
Method of Difference
Representative Sample
Causal claim
Biased Sample
16. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
Sufficient Condition
Method of Concomitant Variation
hasty generalization
Method of Difference
17. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
Necessary Condition
Sample
Opinion polls
Sufficient Condition
18. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
Sufficient Condition
Sample
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Causal claim
19. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
Causal claim
hasty generalization
Enumerative Argument
Target Group
20. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
Method of Difference
Relevant Property
Margin of Error
Opinion polls
21. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
hasty generalization
Representative Sample
Analogy
Relevant Property
22. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
Confidence Level
Inductive Argument
Method of Concomitant Variation
Margin of Error
23. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
Analogy
Causal claim
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Opinion polls
24. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Target Group
Confidence Level
Necessary Condition
Method of Difference