SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
Target Group
Sample
Causal claim
Method of Difference
2. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
Inference to the best explanation
Target Group
Method of Difference
hasty generalization
3. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
Target Group
Method of Concomitant Variation
Sufficient Condition
Random Sample
4. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
Enumerative Argument
Opinion polls
Random Sample
Biased Sample
5. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Inference to the best explanation
Inductive Argument
Enumerative Argument
Analogy
6. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Sample
Analogy
Method of Difference
7. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Inductive Argument
Inference to the best explanation
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
8. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Inductive Argument
Sample
Margin of Error
9. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
analogical induction
Representative Sample
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Analogy
10. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Random Sample
analogical induction
Confidence Level
Opinion polls
11. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
Inductive Argument
hasty generalization
Analogy
Relevant Property
12. A statement about the cause of things.
Random Sample
Analogy
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Causal claim
13. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
causal argument
Inference to the best explanation
Representative Sample
Sample
14. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
Method of Difference
Sample
Margin of Error
Analogy
15. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
Representative Sample
analogical induction
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Target Group
16. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
Target Group
hasty generalization
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Analogy
17. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
Margin of Error
Necessary Condition
Analogy
Representative Sample
18. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Method of Concomitant Variation
Analogy
Target Group
Confidence Level
19. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
Sufficient Condition
Method of Agreement
Sample
Method of Concomitant Variation
20. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
Sufficient Condition
Biased Sample
Sample
Opinion polls
21. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
hasty generalization
Target Group
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Enumerative Argument
22. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
Method of Agreement
analogical induction
Enumerative Argument
Target Group
23. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
Target Group
Representative Sample
Inference to the best explanation
Necessary Condition
24. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Causal claim
Biased Sample
Opinion polls
Margin of Error