SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
Inference to the best explanation
Necessary Condition
Confidence Level
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
2. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
Inference to the best explanation
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Representative Sample
hasty generalization
3. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
Confidence Level
Representative Sample
Sufficient Condition
causal argument
4. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
causal argument
Confidence Level
Sample
Method of Concomitant Variation
5. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
Margin of Error
hasty generalization
Representative Sample
Necessary Condition
6. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Random Sample
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Target Group
7. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
Representative Sample
Method of Concomitant Variation
causal argument
Target Group
8. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
Representative Sample
Necessary Condition
Confidence Level
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
9. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
Inductive Argument
Method of Agreement
Sample
Representative Sample
10. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
Enumerative Argument
Inference to the best explanation
Target Group
Method of Difference
11. A statement about the cause of things.
Causal claim
Biased Sample
Relevant Property
analogical induction
12. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Representative Sample
causal argument
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Inductive Argument
13. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Sample
Necessary Condition
Biased Sample
14. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Relevant Property
Analogy
Sufficient Condition
Random Sample
15. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Confidence Level
Sufficient Condition
causal argument
Necessary Condition
16. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Random Sample
analogical induction
Sample
17. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
hasty generalization
Margin of Error
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Analogy
18. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
Random Sample
Confidence Level
Method of Concomitant Variation
Method of Difference
19. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
Causal claim
Method of Agreement
Method of Difference
Relevant Property
20. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
Relevant Property
Margin of Error
Method of Concomitant Variation
Causal claim
21. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
Analogy
Random Sample
Necessary Condition
Target Group
22. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
Opinion polls
Representative Sample
Method of Agreement
analogical induction
23. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
Inference to the best explanation
Method of Concomitant Variation
Confidence Level
Margin of Error
24. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
Sufficient Condition
Inductive Argument
Enumerative Argument
3 Forms of Inductive Argument