SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A statement about the cause of things.
Sample
Method of Difference
Inference to the best explanation
Causal claim
2. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
Necessary Condition
Sufficient Condition
Opinion polls
Target Group
3. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
Opinion polls
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Sufficient Condition
Necessary Condition
4. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
Method of Agreement
Inductive Argument
Method of Concomitant Variation
Sufficient Condition
5. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
Method of Concomitant Variation
Opinion polls
Enumerative Argument
hasty generalization
6. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
Method of Difference
analogical induction
Sample
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
7. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
Causal claim
Method of Agreement
hasty generalization
Sufficient Condition
8. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
Relevant Property
Random Sample
Confidence Level
Sufficient Condition
9. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Causal claim
Confidence Level
Biased Sample
Opinion polls
10. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
Method of Concomitant Variation
Inference to the best explanation
Random Sample
Margin of Error
11. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Representative Sample
Biased Sample
Inductive Argument
Enumerative Argument
12. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Representative Sample
Sufficient Condition
analogical induction
13. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
Inference to the best explanation
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Opinion polls
Relevant Property
14. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
Margin of Error
Inference to the best explanation
Causal claim
Opinion polls
15. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Opinion polls
Method of Difference
Necessary Condition
16. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
Method of Difference
causal argument
Necessary Condition
Confidence Level
17. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
causal argument
Method of Agreement
Sufficient Condition
analogical induction
18. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
hasty generalization
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Method of Agreement
Random Sample
19. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
Relevant Property
Method of Difference
analogical induction
Confidence Level
20. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Relevant Property
hasty generalization
Random Sample
Inductive Argument
21. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Causal claim
Relevant Property
Confidence Level
Enumerative Argument
22. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
Causal claim
Necessary Condition
Method of Concomitant Variation
Opinion polls
23. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
Sample
Sufficient Condition
Causal claim
Necessary Condition
24. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Representative Sample
Analogy
Biased Sample
Sample