SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
Analogy
Random Sample
Target Group
Opinion polls
2. A statement about the cause of things.
Causal claim
Margin of Error
Sufficient Condition
hasty generalization
3. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
Causal claim
Method of Agreement
Relevant Property
Opinion polls
4. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
analogical induction
Causal claim
Sample
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
5. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
Method of Agreement
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Confidence Level
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
6. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
Target Group
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Necessary Condition
Representative Sample
7. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
Inference to the best explanation
Random Sample
Relevant Property
Representative Sample
8. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Random Sample
Relevant Property
Confidence Level
Sufficient Condition
9. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
Random Sample
Opinion polls
Inference to the best explanation
hasty generalization
10. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Causal claim
Sufficient Condition
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Analogy
11. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
Random Sample
Causal claim
Method of Agreement
Method of Concomitant Variation
12. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
Analogy
Opinion polls
Enumerative Argument
Sufficient Condition
13. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
Necessary Condition
causal argument
Representative Sample
Inference to the best explanation
14. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Target Group
Inductive Argument
Method of Concomitant Variation
Random Sample
15. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
Opinion polls
Necessary Condition
Method of Difference
Confidence Level
16. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
causal argument
Random Sample
Margin of Error
Inference to the best explanation
17. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
Margin of Error
analogical induction
Inference to the best explanation
Sufficient Condition
18. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
Inference to the best explanation
Biased Sample
Random Sample
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
19. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
Sample
Inference to the best explanation
Necessary Condition
Causal claim
20. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
Inference to the best explanation
Enumerative Argument
Method of Difference
Causal claim
21. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Opinion polls
Margin of Error
Method of Agreement
22. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Biased Sample
Margin of Error
Enumerative Argument
Causal claim
23. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Enumerative Argument
Representative Sample
Causal claim
Random Sample
24. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
Random Sample
Enumerative Argument
Opinion polls
causal argument