SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Confidence Level
Inductive Argument
Relevant Property
Method of Concomitant Variation
2. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
causal argument
Biased Sample
Confidence Level
Margin of Error
3. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
Sample
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Method of Agreement
Method of Difference
4. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
Representative Sample
hasty generalization
Method of Difference
Method of Concomitant Variation
5. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
Enumerative Argument
Opinion polls
Method of Difference
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
6. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
Inductive Argument
Inference to the best explanation
Biased Sample
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
7. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
Inductive Argument
Method of Concomitant Variation
analogical induction
Margin of Error
8. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
Enumerative Argument
Causal claim
analogical induction
Method of Concomitant Variation
9. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
causal argument
Enumerative Argument
Relevant Property
Sample
10. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
Inference to the best explanation
Opinion polls
Enumerative Argument
Necessary Condition
11. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Method of Concomitant Variation
causal argument
Inductive Argument
Representative Sample
12. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
Necessary Condition
analogical induction
Causal claim
Relevant Property
13. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
Sufficient Condition
Representative Sample
Opinion polls
Causal claim
14. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
analogical induction
Sufficient Condition
Sample
15. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Sufficient Condition
Random Sample
Method of Concomitant Variation
Analogy
16. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
Margin of Error
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Necessary Condition
Inference to the best explanation
17. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
Method of Difference
Causal claim
Method of Agreement
Margin of Error
18. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
Method of Concomitant Variation
Target Group
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Causal claim
19. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
Representative Sample
causal argument
Inference to the best explanation
hasty generalization
20. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
Method of Concomitant Variation
causal argument
analogical induction
Analogy
21. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
Method of Agreement
Inductive Argument
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Sufficient Condition
22. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Random Sample
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Method of Concomitant Variation
Analogy
23. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Representative Sample
Enumerative Argument
Random Sample
Biased Sample
24. A statement about the cause of things.
analogical induction
Causal claim
Target Group
Representative Sample