SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Sample
Target Group
Random Sample
Method of Agreement
2. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
Method of Agreement
Method of Difference
Necessary Condition
Sample
3. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Method of Agreement
Sample
4. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Target Group
Analogy
Method of Agreement
Inductive Argument
5. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
Causal claim
causal argument
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Inference to the best explanation
6. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
Sufficient Condition
Margin of Error
Method of Difference
Representative Sample
7. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Relevant Property
Opinion polls
Biased Sample
hasty generalization
8. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
Inductive Argument
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Analogy
Method of Concomitant Variation
9. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Confidence Level
Random Sample
Sample
10. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
Analogy
Causal claim
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
analogical induction
11. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
Inference to the best explanation
Enumerative Argument
Causal claim
Representative Sample
12. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Representative Sample
Random Sample
Confidence Level
causal argument
13. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
Enumerative Argument
analogical induction
Representative Sample
Necessary Condition
14. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Opinion polls
causal argument
Causal claim
Inductive Argument
15. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
Method of Concomitant Variation
Sufficient Condition
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Analogy
16. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
Margin of Error
Relevant Property
Method of Difference
Necessary Condition
17. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
Target Group
Method of Concomitant Variation
Necessary Condition
Inductive Argument
18. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
Method of Concomitant Variation
Analogy
Inference to the best explanation
19. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
Target Group
analogical induction
Method of Difference
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
20. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
Sufficient Condition
Target Group
hasty generalization
Random Sample
21. A statement about the cause of things.
Necessary Condition
Method of Agreement
Causal claim
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
22. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
Biased Sample
Opinion polls
Causal claim
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
23. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
analogical induction
Margin of Error
Enumerative Argument
causal argument
24. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
Representative Sample
analogical induction
causal argument
Method of Concomitant Variation