SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Inductive Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 24 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. (or property in question) In enumerative induction - a property - or characteristic - that is of interest in the target group.
Sufficient Condition
Causal claim
Target Group
Relevant Property
2. A condition for the occurrence of an event without which the event cannot occur.
Enumerative Argument
Method of Agreement
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Necessary Condition
3. Reason that because two or more things are similar in several respects - they must be similar in some further respect. We evaluate arguments by analogy according to several criteria: (1) the number of relevant similarities between things being compar
Relevant Property
Biased Sample
analogical induction
Sample
4. If two or more occurrences of a phenomenon have only one relevant factor in common - that factor must be the cause.
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Method of Agreement
Opinion polls
Representative Sample
5. Enumerative inductive arguments - or the basis of enumerative inductive arguments - and must be judged by the same general criteria used to judge any other enumerative induction.
hasty generalization
Method of Agreement
Opinion polls
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
6. The variation between the values derived from a sample and the true values of the whole target group.
Inference to the best explanation
Method of Difference
Enumerative Argument
Margin of Error
7. A sample that does not properly represent the target group.
Biased Sample
Method of Difference
Sufficient Condition
Confidence Level
8. A statement about the cause of things.
Sufficient Condition
Random Sample
Analogy
Causal claim
9. A sample that is selected randomly from a target group in such a way as to ensure that the sample is representative. In a simple random selection - every member of the target group has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.
Inductive Argument
Random Sample
analogical induction
Opinion polls
10. A condition for the occurrence of an event that guarantees that the event occurs.
Biased Sample
Enumerative Argument
Sufficient Condition
causal argument
11. When two events are correlated--when one varies in close connection w/ the other--they are probably related.
Inductive Argument
Relevant Property
Method of Concomitant Variation
Random Sample
12. Argument intended to give probable support for its conclusion.
Representative Sample
Causal claim
Inductive Argument
Confidence Level
13. (after that - therefore because of that). The fallacy of reasoning that just because B followed A - A must have caused B.
Representative Sample
causal argument
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Necessary Condition
14. (or target population) In enumerative induction - the whole collection of individuals under study.
causal argument
Necessary Condition
Target Group
Sample
15. The relevant factor present when a phenomenon occurs - and absent when the phenomenon does not occur - must be the cause.
Method of Difference
causal argument
Margin of Error
Causal claim
16. Argue from premises about some members of a group to a generalization about the entire group. The entire group is called the target group; the observed members of the group - the sample; and the group characteristics we're interested in - the relevan
Sufficient Condition
Inductive Argument
Enumerative Argument
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
17. In enumerative induction - a sample that resembles the target group in all relevant ways.
Method of Difference
Inductive Argument
Random Sample
Representative Sample
18. In statistical theory - the probability that the sample will accurately represent the target group within the margin of error.
Method of Concomitant Variation
Confidence Level
Inference to the best explanation
Random Sample
19. Inductive argument whose conclusion contains a causal claim. There are several inductive patterns of reasoning used to assess causal connections. These include the Method of Agreement - the Method of Difference - the Method of Agreement and Differenc
Analogy
Sufficient Condition
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
causal argument
20. A comparison of two or more things alike in specific respects.
Representative Sample
Target Group
Analogy
analogical induction
21. An enumerative induction can fail to be strong by having a sample that's too small or not representative. When we draw a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size
Target Group
Representative Sample
Method of Concomitant Variation
hasty generalization
22. A form of inductive reasoning in which we reason from premises about a state of affairs to an explanation for that state of affairs:
Necessary Condition
Inference to the best explanation
Random Sample
post hoc - ergo propter hoc
23. Enumerative - Analogical - & Causal.
3 Forms of Inductive Argument
hasty generalization
analogical induction
Margin of Error
24. (or sample member) In enumerative induction - the observed members of the target group.
Inference to the best explanation
analogical induction
Enumerative Argument
Sample