SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
hypothetical
mixed hypothetical syllogism
logic
verbal disagreement
2. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
apparent disagreement
logical equivalence
self-supporting statements
valid
3. Found once in each premise
counterexample
complex question
conclusion
middle term
4. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
obverse of a statement
figure
subimplication
superimplication
5. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
ad populum
valid
converse of a statement
immediate reference
6. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
intension
apparent disagreement
consistant
real disagreement
7. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
hypothetical
real disagreement
argument`
amphiboly
8. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
mood
amphiboly
distributed term
argument`
9. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subject
verbal disagreement
genus
subcontrariety
10. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
ambiguous
logic
real disagreement
subject
11. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ambiguous
counterexample
complex question
middle term
12. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
implication
mood
induction
converse of a statement
13. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
figure
tautology
complex question
mood
14. An argument from lack of evidence
intension
amphiboly
ad ignorantiam
fallacy of distraction
15. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
ad populum
genus
formal logic
conclusion
16. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
fallacies of form
formal logic
informal fallacy
tautology
17. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
intension
square of oppisition
immediate reference
law of identity
18. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
pure hypothetical syllogism
composition
contrary
minor term
19. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
self-contradiction
major term
minor term
amphiboly
20. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
intension
subject
apriorism
counterexample
21. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
informal fallacy
induction
contrapositive of a statement
formal logic
22. The science and art of reasoning well
sound syllogism
counterexample
amphiboly
logic
23. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
law of excluded middle
term
ad populum
genus
24. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
verbal disagreement
major term
figure
25. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
ad ignorantiam
fallacies of form
post hoc ergo propter hoc
consequent
26. An illegimate appeal to authority
ipse dixit
apparent disagreement
apriorism
subject
27. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
supported statements
quantity
fallacies of ambiguity
composition
28. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
pure hypothetical syllogism
division
formal logic
self-supporting statements
29. A statement cannot be both true and false
contrapositive of a statement
law of Non-Contradiction
law of identity
verbal disagreement
30. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
statement
tautology
chronological snobbery
superimplication
31. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
law of excluded middle
minor term
bulverism
formal logic
32. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
sound syllogism
real disagreement
non sequitur
statement
33. A sentence which is either true or false
self-contradiction
statement
contrapositive of a statement
subject
34. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
categorical syllogism
schema
antecedent
obverse of a statement
35. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
intension
tautology
circular reasoning
bulverism
36. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
law of identity
either/or
subcontrariety
major term
37. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
implication
subcontrariety
schema
subject
38. A concept that can be expressed precisely
term
subject
conclusion
middle term
39. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
obverse of a statement
figure
ad populum
distributed term
40. Difference of opinion or perception
subject
figure
apparent disagreement
ipse dixit
41. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
superimplication
statement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
fallacies of form
42. A hasty generalization
apriorism
logical equivalence
ambiguous
extension
43. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
composition
pure hypothetical syllogism
chronological snobbery
intension
44. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
subcontrariety
ad ignorantiam
square of oppisition
extension
45. An illegitimate appeal to force
major term
ad baculum
inclusive
implication
46. Any statement is either true or false
formal logic
distributed term
apriorism
law of excluded middle
47. The condition - the part following the 'if'
amphiboly
antecedent
mixed hypothetical syllogism
subject
48. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
minor premise
non sequitur
ambiguous
argument`
49. The premise containing the major term
major term
major premise
antecedent
sound syllogism
50. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
exclusives
minor term
self-supporting statements
extension