SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The science and art of reasoning well
logic
division
ambiguous
major term
2. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
tu quoque
hypothetical
implication
3. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
consistant
middle term
mixed hypothetical syllogism
real disagreement
4. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
logic
post hoc ergo propter hoc
informal fallacy
fallacy of accent
5. The set of all terms not included in the given term
composition
complement of a term
apriorism
circular reasoning
6. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
verbal disagreement
argument`
extension
independance
7. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
major premise
contrary
self-supporting statements
consistant
8. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
distributed term
pure hypothetical syllogism
composition
disagreement
9. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
categorical syllogism
superimplication
extension
equivocation
10. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
genus
fallacy of distraction
self-supporting statements
11. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
term
non sequitur
apparent disagreement
law of identity
12. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
logic
fallacies of ambiguity
self-supporting statements
major term
13. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
verbal disagreement
exclusives
amphiboly
statement
14. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
sound syllogism
fallacy of distraction
fallacies of ambiguity
subcontrariety
15. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
apriorism
disagreement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
minor premise
16. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
extension
genus
independance
implication
17. An illegitimate appeal to force
composition
intension
subject
ad baculum
18. An illegimate appeal to authority
ad populum
superimplication
disagreement
ipse dixit
19. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
law of excluded middle
immediate reference
ambiguous
converse of a statement
20. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
ad ignorantiam
obverse of a statement
square of oppisition
term
21. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
fallacies of form
contradiction
self-contradiction
amphiboly
22. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
ambiguous
chronological snobbery
mixed hypothetical syllogism
23. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
tu quoque
categorical syllogism
conclusion
either/or
24. Any statement is either true or false
logical equivalence
law of excluded middle
hypothetical
composition
25. Difference of opinion or perception
either/or
self-supporting statements
apparent disagreement
quantity
26. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad hominem
self-contradiction
statement
valid
27. An argument from lack of evidence
mixed hypothetical syllogism
division
fallacy of accent
ad ignorantiam
28. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
antecedent
informal fallacy
complex question
pure hypothetical syllogism
29. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
conclusion
antecedent
apparent disagreement
implication
30. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
tu quoque
intension
supported statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
31. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
figure
bulverism
argument`
equivocation
32. An argument based merely on the passage of time
chronological snobbery
intension
consequent
tu quoque
33. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
self-supporting statements
law of identity
genus
law of Non-Contradiction
34. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
chronological snobbery
subject
consequent
subimplication
35. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
fallacy of distraction
tu quoque
consistant
verbal disagreement
36. If a statement is true - then it is true
distributed term
law of identity
inclusive
pure hypothetical syllogism
37. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
implication
law of identity
either/or
converse of a statement
38. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
exclusives
ad hominem
square of oppisition
composition
39. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
ad hominem
logical equivalence
enthymeme
informal fallacy
40. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of form
induction
disagreement
subject
41. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
self-contradiction
ad populum
inclusive
induction
42. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
post hoc ergo propter hoc
consequent
subimplication
law of identity
43. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
contrary
ad populum
post hoc ergo propter hoc
mood
44. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
informal fallacy
counterexample
induction
schema
45. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
contrapositive of a statement
tautology
post hoc ergo propter hoc
enthymeme
46. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
real disagreement
contradiction
disagreement
conclusion
47. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
contrapositive of a statement
antecedent
enthymeme
either/or
48. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
inclusive
argument`
subject
distributed term
49. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
conclusion
ad populum
tu quoque
tautology
50. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
major premise
exclusives
middle term
hypothetical