SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
supported statements
verbal disagreement
major term
2. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
fallacies of ambiguity
ad hominem
subject
extension
3. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
circular reasoning
independance
self-supporting statements
antecedent
4. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
ad populum
quantity
immediate reference
minor term
5. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
major term
bulverism
schema
subcontrariety
6. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
subject
subcontrariety
self-supporting statements
subimplication
7. A hasty generalization
apriorism
obverse of a statement
ipse dixit
ambiguous
8. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
division
circular reasoning
minor premise
figure
9. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ambiguous
mood
distributed term
contrary
10. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
equivocation
chronological snobbery
subcontrariety
formal logic
11. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
bulverism
major premise
contrapositive of a statement
12. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
conclusion
formal logic
genus
middle term
13. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
chronological snobbery
counterexample
subimplication
14. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
equivocation
logical equivalence
exclusives
circular reasoning
15. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
either/or
quantity
supported statements
16. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
ad baculum
major premise
figure
quantity
17. An illegitimate appeal to force
ad baculum
logic
real disagreement
subject
18. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
tu quoque
chronological snobbery
logical equivalence
hypothetical
19. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
supported statements
mood
tautology
induction
20. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
distributed term
complex question
informal fallacy
apriorism
21. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
inclusive
sound syllogism
fallacies of ambiguity
self-supporting statements
22. The condition - the part following the 'if'
enthymeme
antecedent
argument`
non sequitur
23. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
post hoc ergo propter hoc
major premise
counterexample
schema
24. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
term
ad ignorantiam
non sequitur
distributed term
25. A sentence which is either true or false
subject
statement
verbal disagreement
counterexample
26. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
contrapositive of a statement
minor premise
real disagreement
conclusion
27. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
implication
logical equivalence
term
obverse of a statement
28. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
complement of a term
bulverism
verbal disagreement
29. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
consequent
antecedent
obverse of a statement
law of Non-Contradiction
30. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
composition
schema
logic
31. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
logic
argument`
composition
post hoc ergo propter hoc
32. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
square of oppisition
valid
conclusion
minor premise
33. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
disagreement
ad hominem
minor term
counterexample
34. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
non sequitur
superimplication
bulverism
distributed term
35. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
ad hominem
pure hypothetical syllogism
formal logic
extension
36. A statement cannot be both true and false
argument`
equivocation
law of Non-Contradiction
mood
37. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
intension
major term
genus
non sequitur
38. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
contradiction
law of Non-Contradiction
conclusion
subcontrariety
39. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
self-contradiction
superimplication
bulverism
ad populum
40. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
ipse dixit
non sequitur
fallacy of accent
circular reasoning
41. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
minor term
argument`
induction
implication
42. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
chronological snobbery
disagreement
converse of a statement
contradiction
43. An argument from lack of evidence
verbal disagreement
ad ignorantiam
ad baculum
chronological snobbery
44. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
verbal disagreement
equivocation
logical equivalence
intension
45. The set of all terms not included in the given term
composition
converse of a statement
complement of a term
verbal disagreement
46. A concept that can be expressed precisely
mood
ad ignorantiam
superimplication
term
47. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
figure
exclusives
consequent
formal logic
48. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
statement
contrapositive of a statement
consistant
composition
49. The premise containing the major term
amphiboly
major premise
either/or
implication
50. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
figure
consistant
equivocation
complex question