SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
conclusion
non sequitur
pure hypothetical syllogism
consequent
2. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
informal fallacy
circular reasoning
quantity
tu quoque
3. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
self-supporting statements
induction
ad hominem
bulverism
4. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
sound syllogism
equivocation
contrapositive of a statement
conclusion
5. A statement cannot be both true and false
quantity
independance
immediate reference
law of Non-Contradiction
6. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
middle term
subject
minor premise
superimplication
7. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
fallacies of form
tautology
ad hominem
self-contradiction
8. Contains the minor term
minor premise
chronological snobbery
circular reasoning
immediate reference
9. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ambiguous
square of oppisition
supported statements
immediate reference
10. The set of all terms not included in the given term
converse of a statement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
complement of a term
self-supporting statements
11. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
complex question
ipse dixit
equivocation
converse of a statement
12. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
counterexample
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ad baculum
fallacy of distraction
13. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
ad populum
law of identity
logical equivalence
real disagreement
14. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
pure hypothetical syllogism
exclusives
enthymeme
equivocation
15. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
ambiguous
independance
intension
amphiboly
16. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
extension
schema
counterexample
tautology
17. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
sound syllogism
argument`
inclusive
major premise
18. Difference of opinion or perception
superimplication
apparent disagreement
fallacies of ambiguity
inclusive
19. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
antecedent
hypothetical
logic
pure hypothetical syllogism
20. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
minor term
independance
quantity
consistant
21. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
term
conclusion
exclusives
composition
22. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
converse of a statement
composition
chronological snobbery
enthymeme
23. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
major premise
fallacy of accent
disagreement
converse of a statement
24. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
ad baculum
contrapositive of a statement
apriorism
contradiction
25. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
apriorism
immediate reference
conclusion
square of oppisition
26. An argument from lack of evidence
self-contradiction
ad ignorantiam
law of identity
quantity
27. Found once in each premise
middle term
amphiboly
informal fallacy
circular reasoning
28. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
chronological snobbery
law of Non-Contradiction
fallacies of form
division
29. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
distributed term
major term
ad hominem
argument`
30. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
circular reasoning
pure hypothetical syllogism
informal fallacy
major premise
31. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
major premise
real disagreement
contradiction
32. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
amphiboly
contradiction
figure
chronological snobbery
33. The premise containing the major term
conclusion
independance
major premise
law of identity
34. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
ad baculum
composition
major term
verbal disagreement
35. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
tautology
self-supporting statements
logical equivalence
bulverism
36. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
supported statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
complex question
mixed hypothetical syllogism
37. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
ad ignorantiam
logic
contrary
argument`
38. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
intension
converse of a statement
statement
formal logic
39. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
ipse dixit
genus
argument`
40. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
informal fallacy
mood
converse of a statement
tu quoque
41. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
contradiction
hypothetical
apriorism
contrary
42. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
major premise
fallacy of accent
law of identity
minor premise
43. A hasty generalization
apriorism
complement of a term
enthymeme
post hoc ergo propter hoc
44. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
converse of a statement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
logical equivalence
square of oppisition
45. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
self-supporting statements
converse of a statement
figure
tautology
46. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
genus
informal fallacy
post hoc ergo propter hoc
circular reasoning
47. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
converse of a statement
ambiguous
consequent
implication
48. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
counterexample
obverse of a statement
valid
inclusive
49. A sentence which is either true or false
schema
statement
ad hominem
exclusives
50. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
ad ignorantiam
amphiboly
fallacy of distraction
consistant