SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
equivocation
independance
minor term
self-contradiction
2. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
logic
disagreement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
self-contradiction
3. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
obverse of a statement
middle term
ipse dixit
division
4. The science and art of reasoning well
distributed term
antecedent
subimplication
logic
5. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
complex question
either/or
equivocation
genus
6. Any statement is either true or false
major term
law of excluded middle
formal logic
statement
7. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
non sequitur
supported statements
figure
fallacies of form
8. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
major term
counterexample
major premise
chronological snobbery
9. The condition - the part following the 'if'
superimplication
major term
antecedent
exclusives
10. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
fallacy of distraction
intension
chronological snobbery
contrapositive of a statement
11. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
complement of a term
non sequitur
counterexample
intension
12. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
obverse of a statement
counterexample
real disagreement
ad populum
13. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
formal logic
extension
post hoc ergo propter hoc
implication
14. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
apparent disagreement
argument`
extension
inclusive
15. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
pure hypothetical syllogism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
minor term
mood
16. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
ambiguous
post hoc ergo propter hoc
minor premise
17. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
enthymeme
subcontrariety
formal logic
18. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
logic
disagreement
independance
enthymeme
19. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
converse of a statement
hypothetical
formal logic
schema
20. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
law of identity
supported statements
intension
minor term
21. If a statement is true - then it is true
immediate reference
law of identity
statement
minor term
22. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad hominem
law of excluded middle
implication
conclusion
23. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
fallacies of ambiguity
informal fallacy
fallacies of form
fallacy of accent
24. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
induction
pure hypothetical syllogism
law of excluded middle
enthymeme
25. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
law of identity
equivocation
verbal disagreement
inclusive
26. Found once in each premise
tautology
categorical syllogism
non sequitur
middle term
27. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
bulverism
pure hypothetical syllogism
immediate reference
fallacies of form
28. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
contradiction
self-contradiction
contrary
figure
29. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
immediate reference
subject
converse of a statement
fallacy of distraction
30. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
independance
self-supporting statements
bulverism
law of Non-Contradiction
31. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
logical equivalence
square of oppisition
hypothetical
ad hominem
32. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
bulverism
self-contradiction
sound syllogism
mood
33. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
non sequitur
inclusive
converse of a statement
34. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
contradiction
real disagreement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
division
35. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
division
disagreement
supported statements
ad baculum
36. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mood
equivocation
mixed hypothetical syllogism
subimplication
37. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
quantity
contrapositive of a statement
induction
argument`
38. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
complement of a term
hypothetical
categorical syllogism
apriorism
39. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
argument`
implication
induction
superimplication
40. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
converse of a statement
informal fallacy
enthymeme
quantity
41. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
immediate reference
circular reasoning
mood
sound syllogism
42. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
immediate reference
ad ignorantiam
equivocation
law of identity
43. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
valid
self-contradiction
major term
ad ignorantiam
44. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
quantity
amphiboly
complex question
extension
45. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
ipse dixit
fallacies of ambiguity
minor premise
independance
46. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
exclusives
apriorism
pure hypothetical syllogism
amphiboly
47. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
subcontrariety
verbal disagreement
ipse dixit
self-supporting statements
48. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
ad populum
amphiboly
term
consequent
49. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
non sequitur
ad ignorantiam
sound syllogism
50. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
contrary
self-contradiction
informal fallacy
mood