SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
superimplication
supported statements
immediate reference
self-contradiction
2. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
subject
supported statements
composition
immediate reference
3. Contains the minor term
statement
minor term
minor premise
law of excluded middle
4. The set of all terms not included in the given term
self-contradiction
complement of a term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
valid
5. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
bulverism
fallacy of accent
subject
logical equivalence
6. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
ad hominem
apparent disagreement
subcontrariety
self-contradiction
7. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
law of excluded middle
ambiguous
fallacies of ambiguity
distributed term
8. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
non sequitur
ad baculum
self-contradiction
hypothetical
9. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
tu quoque
mixed hypothetical syllogism
square of oppisition
composition
10. The premise containing the major term
logical equivalence
major premise
intension
ad baculum
11. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
pure hypothetical syllogism
law of excluded middle
subject
mood
12. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
logic
circular reasoning
tu quoque
complement of a term
13. Any statement is either true or false
consistant
informal fallacy
minor premise
law of excluded middle
14. An illegitimate appeal to force
independance
ad baculum
law of identity
ad populum
15. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
obverse of a statement
bulverism
counterexample
16. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
schema
inclusive
consistant
valid
17. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
disagreement
composition
non sequitur
consequent
18. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
genus
minor premise
real disagreement
19. Difference of opinion or perception
complement of a term
antecedent
subimplication
apparent disagreement
20. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
complement of a term
supported statements
subimplication
inclusive
21. An argument based merely on the passage of time
real disagreement
chronological snobbery
major term
square of oppisition
22. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
sound syllogism
real disagreement
logical equivalence
law of Non-Contradiction
23. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
distributed term
apriorism
extension
intension
24. A statement cannot be both true and false
supported statements
minor term
law of Non-Contradiction
complement of a term
25. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
ipse dixit
conclusion
self-supporting statements
enthymeme
26. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
exclusives
genus
major term
logical equivalence
27. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ad hominem
contrapositive of a statement
ambiguous
genus
28. Found once in each premise
extension
logical equivalence
middle term
intension
29. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
superimplication
term
intension
post hoc ergo propter hoc
30. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
implication
subimplication
contradiction
contrapositive of a statement
31. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
valid
implication
minor premise
conclusion
32. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
genus
ad hominem
categorical syllogism
apriorism
33. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
composition
ad populum
ipse dixit
converse of a statement
34. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
consistant
induction
minor term
implication
35. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
apparent disagreement
disagreement
fallacy of accent
chronological snobbery
36. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
valid
fallacies of ambiguity
subimplication
fallacy of accent
37. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
law of identity
apparent disagreement
subcontrariety
subject
38. An argument from lack of evidence
obverse of a statement
conclusion
law of Non-Contradiction
ad ignorantiam
39. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
intension
valid
term
informal fallacy
40. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
consequent
tautology
division
categorical syllogism
41. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
major premise
non sequitur
chronological snobbery
circular reasoning
42. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
circular reasoning
argument`
complement of a term
exclusives
43. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
logic
subimplication
contrapositive of a statement
exclusives
44. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
bulverism
ad baculum
sound syllogism
45. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
chronological snobbery
subimplication
enthymeme
46. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
statement
complex question
division
schema
47. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
contradiction
superimplication
fallacies of form
statement
48. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
converse of a statement
bulverism
fallacy of accent
disagreement
49. The science and art of reasoning well
apriorism
logic
counterexample
implication
50. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
minor premise
argument`
inclusive
formal logic