SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
supported statements
counterexample
hypothetical
sound syllogism
2. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
contrary
apriorism
consequent
immediate reference
3. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
conclusion
enthymeme
quantity
4. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
fallacies of ambiguity
valid
subject
self-supporting statements
5. Contains the minor term
categorical syllogism
statement
minor premise
law of Non-Contradiction
6. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
sound syllogism
supported statements
inclusive
fallacy of accent
7. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
law of excluded middle
implication
distributed term
8. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
contrary
self-contradiction
consistant
complement of a term
9. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of Non-Contradiction
post hoc ergo propter hoc
law of identity
complement of a term
10. The set of all terms not included in the given term
complement of a term
amphiboly
fallacy of accent
fallacies of form
11. The science and art of reasoning well
amphiboly
middle term
logic
pure hypothetical syllogism
12. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
converse of a statement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
tautology
independance
13. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
extension
chronological snobbery
converse of a statement
subimplication
14. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
sound syllogism
conclusion
logic
hypothetical
15. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ambiguous
self-supporting statements
subcontrariety
composition
16. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
antecedent
apparent disagreement
logical equivalence
fallacy of accent
17. A concept that can be expressed precisely
valid
ad baculum
circular reasoning
term
18. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
contradiction
fallacies of ambiguity
supported statements
intension
19. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
ad populum
verbal disagreement
antecedent
either/or
20. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
obverse of a statement
minor premise
non sequitur
bulverism
21. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
real disagreement
composition
independance
ipse dixit
22. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
ipse dixit
ambiguous
middle term
equivocation
23. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
superimplication
complex question
extension
law of identity
24. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
contradiction
mixed hypothetical syllogism
law of Non-Contradiction
fallacies of form
25. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
antecedent
counterexample
subject
26. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
contrapositive of a statement
law of excluded middle
term
induction
27. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
fallacy of distraction
antecedent
disagreement
division
28. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
law of Non-Contradiction
consequent
ad populum
29. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
contradiction
ipse dixit
ad populum
ad baculum
30. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
distributed term
division
figure
real disagreement
31. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
tautology
consequent
contrary
obverse of a statement
32. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
supported statements
amphiboly
valid
exclusives
33. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
tu quoque
genus
mood
counterexample
34. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
contradiction
tu quoque
post hoc ergo propter hoc
implication
35. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
self-contradiction
minor premise
major term
36. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
implication
formal logic
fallacies of ambiguity
independance
37. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
post hoc ergo propter hoc
fallacies of ambiguity
induction
law of identity
38. An argument from lack of evidence
ad ignorantiam
law of Non-Contradiction
apparent disagreement
obverse of a statement
39. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
extension
informal fallacy
categorical syllogism
consistant
40. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
extension
exclusives
valid
chronological snobbery
41. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
formal logic
distributed term
inclusive
quantity
42. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
composition
self-contradiction
quantity
supported statements
43. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
figure
categorical syllogism
major term
law of excluded middle
44. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
tu quoque
circular reasoning
ad baculum
minor term
45. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
post hoc ergo propter hoc
logic
argument`
complement of a term
46. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
self-contradiction
complement of a term
disagreement
immediate reference
47. The premise containing the major term
apparent disagreement
square of oppisition
figure
major premise
48. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
ad hominem
formal logic
fallacy of distraction
subject
49. A statement cannot be both true and false
law of Non-Contradiction
fallacy of distraction
real disagreement
genus
50. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
self-contradiction
ad hominem
antecedent
quantity