SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
ad ignorantiam
fallacies of ambiguity
logic
genus
2. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
exclusives
minor premise
real disagreement
law of Non-Contradiction
3. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
middle term
division
ipse dixit
apriorism
4. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
conclusion
fallacies of form
hypothetical
5. A sentence which is either true or false
inclusive
division
statement
square of oppisition
6. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
ambiguous
informal fallacy
complement of a term
non sequitur
7. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
self-contradiction
quantity
post hoc ergo propter hoc
formal logic
8. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
contradiction
complement of a term
apparent disagreement
genus
9. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
superimplication
subcontrariety
major premise
disagreement
10. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
supported statements
implication
consistant
11. The set of all terms not included in the given term
minor premise
fallacy of accent
complement of a term
valid
12. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
logical equivalence
extension
tu quoque
law of excluded middle
13. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
tu quoque
bulverism
middle term
14. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of form
equivocation
self-supporting statements
law of Non-Contradiction
15. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
counterexample
informal fallacy
ad hominem
bulverism
16. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
inclusive
mixed hypothetical syllogism
square of oppisition
formal logic
17. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
enthymeme
consistant
law of identity
obverse of a statement
18. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
self-supporting statements
complement of a term
major premise
quantity
19. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
logic
chronological snobbery
enthymeme
ad populum
20. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
contrary
tu quoque
consequent
extension
21. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
verbal disagreement
inclusive
ad baculum
subject
22. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
major term
real disagreement
implication
ambiguous
23. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
obverse of a statement
equivocation
composition
conclusion
24. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
exclusives
self-supporting statements
induction
informal fallacy
25. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
amphiboly
complement of a term
categorical syllogism
fallacy of distraction
26. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
genus
extension
self-contradiction
counterexample
27. The condition - the part following the 'if'
extension
antecedent
quantity
law of Non-Contradiction
28. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
fallacies of ambiguity
quantity
obverse of a statement
genus
29. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
amphiboly
genus
fallacies of form
logical equivalence
30. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
law of excluded middle
categorical syllogism
independance
intension
31. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
statement
fallacy of distraction
subject
32. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
ad baculum
extension
obverse of a statement
valid
33. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
ambiguous
mixed hypothetical syllogism
conclusion
non sequitur
34. An illegitimate appeal to force
argument`
ad populum
ad baculum
fallacies of form
35. A concept that can be expressed precisely
term
hypothetical
chronological snobbery
inclusive
36. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
sound syllogism
fallacies of ambiguity
division
categorical syllogism
37. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
consequent
figure
minor term
superimplication
38. Is valid and has true premises
ipse dixit
figure
tautology
sound syllogism
39. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
ad hominem
enthymeme
figure
converse of a statement
40. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
quantity
counterexample
formal logic
ambiguous
41. Found once in each premise
law of excluded middle
middle term
informal fallacy
figure
42. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
antecedent
major term
counterexample
conclusion
43. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
consistant
genus
bulverism
middle term
44. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
ipse dixit
valid
contrapositive of a statement
mood
45. If a statement is true - then it is true
consistant
law of identity
amphiboly
ambiguous
46. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
fallacy of distraction
subcontrariety
distributed term
mood
47. An argument based merely on the passage of time
fallacy of accent
distributed term
extension
chronological snobbery
48. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
distributed term
inclusive
either/or
induction
49. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacy of accent
independance
ad hominem
tautology
50. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
equivocation
self-contradiction
ambiguous
converse of a statement