SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
law of identity
pure hypothetical syllogism
extension
post hoc ergo propter hoc
2. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
contradiction
bulverism
informal fallacy
either/or
3. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
fallacy of distraction
ad hominem
either/or
consistant
4. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
obverse of a statement
circular reasoning
implication
bulverism
5. The premise containing the major term
consistant
consequent
major premise
exclusives
6. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
independance
subimplication
hypothetical
apriorism
7. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
contrary
immediate reference
equivocation
logic
8. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
ambiguous
obverse of a statement
consequent
non sequitur
9. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
ad ignorantiam
ad populum
contradiction
figure
10. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
intension
ambiguous
distributed term
disagreement
11. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
ad ignorantiam
law of Non-Contradiction
exclusives
verbal disagreement
12. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
square of oppisition
major term
complex question
subcontrariety
13. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
contradiction
schema
formal logic
tu quoque
14. A hasty generalization
non sequitur
contrary
ad baculum
apriorism
15. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
hypothetical
intension
logic
converse of a statement
16. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
apriorism
distributed term
ambiguous
circular reasoning
17. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
chronological snobbery
apparent disagreement
fallacy of accent
counterexample
18. An argument from lack of evidence
subcontrariety
quantity
ad ignorantiam
extension
19. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
tu quoque
logical equivalence
enthymeme
verbal disagreement
20. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
minor premise
law of identity
valid
fallacy of distraction
21. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
mixed hypothetical syllogism
distributed term
genus
22. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
induction
distributed term
equivocation
subject
23. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
counterexample
contrapositive of a statement
verbal disagreement
quantity
24. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
law of Non-Contradiction
bulverism
minor premise
informal fallacy
25. A concept that can be expressed precisely
term
circular reasoning
minor premise
bulverism
26. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
contrapositive of a statement
extension
apriorism
pure hypothetical syllogism
27. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
ipse dixit
extension
minor premise
post hoc ergo propter hoc
28. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
consistant
enthymeme
ad hominem
counterexample
29. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
figure
ambiguous
square of oppisition
30. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
intension
hypothetical
consequent
complement of a term
31. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
real disagreement
consequent
mood
logic
32. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
non sequitur
mixed hypothetical syllogism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
figure
33. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
tautology
obverse of a statement
major premise
subimplication
34. The condition - the part following the 'if'
antecedent
self-contradiction
ad baculum
enthymeme
35. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
self-contradiction
antecedent
contrary
36. The science and art of reasoning well
apparent disagreement
consistant
logic
informal fallacy
37. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
supported statements
real disagreement
ad hominem
logical equivalence
38. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
sound syllogism
pure hypothetical syllogism
disagreement
figure
39. An argument based merely on the passage of time
converse of a statement
law of Non-Contradiction
contradiction
chronological snobbery
40. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
ipse dixit
equivocation
obverse of a statement
categorical syllogism
41. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
enthymeme
categorical syllogism
term
42. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
amphiboly
mood
complex question
disagreement
43. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
tautology
minor premise
real disagreement
44. The set of all terms not included in the given term
ad populum
law of identity
complement of a term
ipse dixit
45. A statement cannot be both true and false
circular reasoning
law of Non-Contradiction
subject
subimplication
46. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
law of identity
consequent
either/or
47. Contains the minor term
chronological snobbery
contrary
minor premise
antecedent
48. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
self-supporting statements
fallacy of distraction
superimplication
enthymeme
49. Is valid and has true premises
fallacy of distraction
sound syllogism
argument`
implication
50. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
intension
ambiguous
logical equivalence
law of excluded middle