SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The condition - the part following the 'if'
minor term
composition
division
antecedent
2. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
argument`
statement
exclusives
counterexample
3. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
consistant
antecedent
subimplication
minor premise
4. An illegimate appeal to authority
argument`
ipse dixit
contrapositive of a statement
division
5. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
ad ignorantiam
law of identity
amphiboly
apparent disagreement
6. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
self-contradiction
contrary
major term
obverse of a statement
7. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
contrary
minor premise
fallacies of form
8. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
apriorism
schema
contrary
9. Is valid and has true premises
complement of a term
consistant
obverse of a statement
sound syllogism
10. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
subimplication
square of oppisition
complex question
logic
11. The set of all terms not included in the given term
consequent
distributed term
complement of a term
complex question
12. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
law of Non-Contradiction
immediate reference
genus
fallacy of distraction
13. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
apriorism
square of oppisition
fallacy of distraction
valid
14. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
logical equivalence
square of oppisition
subimplication
contradiction
15. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
composition
independance
ad hominem
informal fallacy
16. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
self-supporting statements
law of Non-Contradiction
superimplication
figure
17. The science and art of reasoning well
induction
logic
major premise
antecedent
18. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
composition
consequent
equivocation
mixed hypothetical syllogism
19. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
immediate reference
apriorism
subject
figure
20. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
mixed hypothetical syllogism
consequent
subcontrariety
schema
21. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
implication
superimplication
fallacies of ambiguity
statement
22. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
independance
schema
valid
quantity
23. An argument from lack of evidence
ad ignorantiam
subimplication
term
apparent disagreement
24. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
contrapositive of a statement
mood
division
circular reasoning
25. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
fallacy of distraction
major term
genus
valid
26. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
middle term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
hypothetical
apriorism
27. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
fallacies of form
subcontrariety
ad baculum
28. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
intension
disagreement
contrary
non sequitur
29. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
law of Non-Contradiction
disagreement
figure
formal logic
30. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
valid
law of identity
contrapositive of a statement
circular reasoning
31. The premise containing the major term
complement of a term
major premise
schema
informal fallacy
32. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
major premise
subcontrariety
distributed term
implication
33. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
complement of a term
subcontrariety
equivocation
induction
34. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
genus
figure
tu quoque
logical equivalence
35. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
ad hominem
superimplication
genus
division
36. A concept that can be expressed precisely
term
logic
superimplication
fallacy of accent
37. Found once in each premise
ad populum
logical equivalence
middle term
disagreement
38. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
fallacies of ambiguity
consequent
genus
intension
39. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
circular reasoning
contrary
fallacy of accent
argument`
40. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
immediate reference
amphiboly
real disagreement
self-supporting statements
41. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
supported statements
logic
real disagreement
composition
42. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
equivocation
subject
law of identity
complex question
43. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
formal logic
supported statements
self-supporting statements
ad populum
44. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
logical equivalence
statement
counterexample
argument`
45. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
intension
verbal disagreement
tautology
real disagreement
46. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
minor term
either/or
real disagreement
informal fallacy
47. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
disagreement
immediate reference
independance
argument`
48. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of form
tu quoque
real disagreement
law of identity
49. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
apriorism
complex question
ambiguous
minor premise
50. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
complex question
counterexample
tu quoque
chronological snobbery