SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
complex question
exclusives
ad hominem
2. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
self-supporting statements
converse of a statement
ad hominem
supported statements
3. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
self-contradiction
pure hypothetical syllogism
informal fallacy
equivocation
4. Any statement is either true or false
amphiboly
law of excluded middle
real disagreement
tu quoque
5. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
major term
formal logic
contrary
schema
6. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
formal logic
genus
self-contradiction
mood
7. A hasty generalization
fallacies of ambiguity
apriorism
informal fallacy
genus
8. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
exclusives
informal fallacy
logic
self-contradiction
9. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
chronological snobbery
apriorism
antecedent
square of oppisition
10. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
extension
superimplication
real disagreement
statement
11. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
verbal disagreement
tautology
supported statements
subject
12. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
composition
fallacy of distraction
division
13. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
either/or
genus
superimplication
chronological snobbery
14. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
equivocation
pure hypothetical syllogism
counterexample
post hoc ergo propter hoc
15. An illegitimate appeal to force
law of excluded middle
ambiguous
ad baculum
superimplication
16. The condition - the part following the 'if'
antecedent
fallacies of ambiguity
ad ignorantiam
schema
17. The set of all terms not included in the given term
complement of a term
fallacies of ambiguity
superimplication
square of oppisition
18. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
minor term
composition
ad populum
contradiction
19. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
either/or
bulverism
valid
minor premise
20. An argument from lack of evidence
ad ignorantiam
either/or
intension
law of Non-Contradiction
21. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
square of oppisition
obverse of a statement
ipse dixit
minor term
22. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
square of oppisition
amphiboly
intension
subject
23. Is valid and has true premises
square of oppisition
fallacy of distraction
apparent disagreement
sound syllogism
24. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
valid
pure hypothetical syllogism
enthymeme
subcontrariety
25. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
argument`
hypothetical
superimplication
inclusive
26. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
law of identity
logical equivalence
division
subimplication
27. An illegimate appeal to authority
circular reasoning
distributed term
ipse dixit
subcontrariety
28. An argument based merely on the passage of time
apriorism
tautology
induction
chronological snobbery
29. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad hominem
chronological snobbery
genus
consistant
30. A statement cannot be both true and false
contradiction
law of Non-Contradiction
supported statements
inclusive
31. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
term
contradiction
conclusion
mood
32. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
immediate reference
induction
categorical syllogism
complement of a term
33. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
logic
composition
amphiboly
induction
34. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
ad baculum
post hoc ergo propter hoc
fallacies of form
statement
35. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
schema
subcontrariety
formal logic
36. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
subimplication
contrapositive of a statement
quantity
major term
37. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
ad populum
informal fallacy
middle term
disagreement
38. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
fallacies of form
fallacy of distraction
quantity
real disagreement
39. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
disagreement
antecedent
intension
post hoc ergo propter hoc
40. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
subimplication
implication
contradiction
supported statements
41. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacy of accent
mood
genus
contrary
42. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
term
independance
law of Non-Contradiction
mood
43. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
fallacies of ambiguity
intension
consistant
complex question
44. If a statement is true - then it is true
inclusive
law of identity
composition
ad baculum
45. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
counterexample
consequent
apriorism
inclusive
46. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
distributed term
composition
real disagreement
apriorism
47. The premise containing the major term
ad populum
major premise
self-supporting statements
schema
48. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
contrary
fallacy of distraction
middle term
49. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
supported statements
square of oppisition
composition
logical equivalence
50. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
middle term
consistant
post hoc ergo propter hoc
tu quoque