SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. An illegitimate appeal to force
fallacy of accent
genus
tautology
ad baculum
2. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
law of identity
subject
exclusives
verbal disagreement
3. A concept that can be expressed precisely
term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
minor premise
enthymeme
4. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
minor term
consequent
immediate reference
figure
5. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
mixed hypothetical syllogism
pure hypothetical syllogism
composition
ad ignorantiam
6. The premise containing the major term
quantity
fallacy of distraction
logic
major premise
7. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
intension
inclusive
verbal disagreement
subimplication
8. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
categorical syllogism
contrary
real disagreement
informal fallacy
9. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
ad populum
subcontrariety
real disagreement
ad ignorantiam
10. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
figure
superimplication
consistant
subimplication
11. The science and art of reasoning well
apriorism
antecedent
immediate reference
logic
12. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
contrapositive of a statement
supported statements
subcontrariety
amphiboly
13. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
inclusive
tautology
fallacy of distraction
valid
14. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
law of excluded middle
major term
tu quoque
either/or
15. Is valid and has true premises
apriorism
valid
chronological snobbery
sound syllogism
16. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
ad hominem
schema
superimplication
formal logic
17. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
either/or
logical equivalence
self-supporting statements
ad hominem
18. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
figure
mixed hypothetical syllogism
valid
tu quoque
19. An illegimate appeal to authority
contrary
mood
fallacies of ambiguity
ipse dixit
20. Found once in each premise
superimplication
major term
middle term
enthymeme
21. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
circular reasoning
equivocation
contrary
quantity
22. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
mixed hypothetical syllogism
implication
schema
fallacies of ambiguity
23. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
intension
pure hypothetical syllogism
middle term
fallacies of ambiguity
24. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
consequent
ipse dixit
complex question
formal logic
25. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
amphiboly
argument`
figure
26. A hasty generalization
figure
middle term
apriorism
term
27. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
chronological snobbery
square of oppisition
informal fallacy
fallacy of distraction
28. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
equivocation
subcontrariety
composition
division
29. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
intension
apriorism
either/or
law of Non-Contradiction
30. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
mixed hypothetical syllogism
self-supporting statements
square of oppisition
amphiboly
31. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
fallacies of form
logical equivalence
contrapositive of a statement
intension
32. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
minor premise
square of oppisition
immediate reference
equivocation
33. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
circular reasoning
self-supporting statements
extension
34. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
counterexample
subimplication
supported statements
ad hominem
35. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
disagreement
fallacy of distraction
hypothetical
bulverism
36. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
fallacies of form
genus
implication
law of excluded middle
37. A statement cannot be both true and false
statement
law of Non-Contradiction
tu quoque
square of oppisition
38. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
extension
real disagreement
self-supporting statements
counterexample
39. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of form
division
subject
consequent
40. Any statement is either true or false
bulverism
law of excluded middle
pure hypothetical syllogism
equivocation
41. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
converse of a statement
circular reasoning
exclusives
42. An argument from lack of evidence
law of identity
ad ignorantiam
schema
supported statements
43. An argument based merely on the passage of time
ipse dixit
chronological snobbery
figure
equivocation
44. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
minor premise
quantity
verbal disagreement
apriorism
45. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
enthymeme
composition
extension
ad hominem
46. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
ad ignorantiam
complement of a term
categorical syllogism
composition
47. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ad hominem
fallacies of ambiguity
ambiguous
valid
48. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
informal fallacy
chronological snobbery
immediate reference
minor premise
49. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
verbal disagreement
contrapositive of a statement
converse of a statement
superimplication
50. Difference of opinion or perception
counterexample
middle term
apparent disagreement
fallacy of distraction