SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
verbal disagreement
middle term
consistant
major term
2. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
pure hypothetical syllogism
self-contradiction
complement of a term
ad hominem
3. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
extension
ad populum
law of Non-Contradiction
4. An illegitimate appeal to force
ad baculum
converse of a statement
immediate reference
real disagreement
5. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
chronological snobbery
consistant
ipse dixit
valid
6. A hasty generalization
apriorism
formal logic
statement
minor premise
7. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
law of excluded middle
extension
distributed term
ad baculum
8. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
composition
consistant
apriorism
ipse dixit
9. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
extension
real disagreement
major premise
categorical syllogism
10. A concept that can be expressed precisely
major term
superimplication
term
ipse dixit
11. The premise containing the major term
major premise
major term
real disagreement
induction
12. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
composition
post hoc ergo propter hoc
quantity
13. An argument based merely on the passage of time
major premise
chronological snobbery
hypothetical
square of oppisition
14. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad hominem
ad populum
converse of a statement
supported statements
15. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
immediate reference
tautology
contrary
consistant
16. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
ad populum
implication
logical equivalence
genus
17. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
sound syllogism
equivocation
hypothetical
circular reasoning
18. A sentence which is either true or false
formal logic
induction
statement
self-contradiction
19. The set of all terms not included in the given term
non sequitur
contrary
complement of a term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
20. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
minor premise
valid
contrapositive of a statement
fallacy of distraction
21. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
division
antecedent
real disagreement
schema
22. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of form
logical equivalence
subject
non sequitur
23. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
apparent disagreement
apriorism
amphiboly
non sequitur
24. An argument from lack of evidence
ad ignorantiam
circular reasoning
law of identity
formal logic
25. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
self-supporting statements
consequent
categorical syllogism
intension
26. The condition - the part following the 'if'
law of identity
mixed hypothetical syllogism
antecedent
extension
27. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
composition
division
major term
disagreement
28. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
superimplication
non sequitur
sound syllogism
pure hypothetical syllogism
29. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
amphiboly
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ad hominem
middle term
30. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
formal logic
statement
minor premise
distributed term
31. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
valid
contrary
subcontrariety
supported statements
32. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
implication
formal logic
chronological snobbery
33. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
contrary
complex question
fallacy of distraction
ipse dixit
34. An illegimate appeal to authority
consistant
fallacies of ambiguity
ipse dixit
inclusive
35. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
contrary
verbal disagreement
term
36. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
square of oppisition
verbal disagreement
ad baculum
37. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
ad ignorantiam
schema
implication
argument`
38. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
pure hypothetical syllogism
circular reasoning
counterexample
amphiboly
39. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
composition
schema
post hoc ergo propter hoc
consistant
40. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
square of oppisition
conclusion
supported statements
inclusive
41. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
supported statements
tu quoque
subject
42. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
chronological snobbery
supported statements
consequent
equivocation
43. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
informal fallacy
fallacy of accent
law of identity
independance
44. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
argument`
schema
distributed term
contradiction
45. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
immediate reference
enthymeme
genus
inclusive
46. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
informal fallacy
fallacies of ambiguity
ambiguous
counterexample
47. Contains the minor term
minor premise
apriorism
apparent disagreement
fallacy of accent
48. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
converse of a statement
conclusion
implication
complement of a term
49. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacies of form
counterexample
fallacies of ambiguity
hypothetical
50. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
statement
self-supporting statements
subimplication
independance