SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of identity
conclusion
bulverism
non sequitur
2. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
sound syllogism
figure
subcontrariety
term
3. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
law of identity
informal fallacy
pure hypothetical syllogism
supported statements
4. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
inclusive
either/or
antecedent
ad populum
5. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
ipse dixit
mood
obverse of a statement
ambiguous
6. An illegimate appeal to authority
chronological snobbery
formal logic
distributed term
ipse dixit
7. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
term
pure hypothetical syllogism
tautology
tu quoque
8. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
consistant
law of identity
figure
non sequitur
9. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
self-supporting statements
either/or
formal logic
figure
10. An argument based merely on the passage of time
distributed term
chronological snobbery
term
ad hominem
11. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
induction
quantity
implication
mood
12. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
argument`
major premise
complex question
self-contradiction
13. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
informal fallacy
distributed term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
quantity
14. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
term
formal logic
fallacies of ambiguity
counterexample
15. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
superimplication
fallacy of accent
tautology
16. Found once in each premise
middle term
statement
tu quoque
categorical syllogism
17. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
chronological snobbery
disagreement
composition
extension
18. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
schema
informal fallacy
post hoc ergo propter hoc
major term
19. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
law of excluded middle
categorical syllogism
middle term
conclusion
20. The condition - the part following the 'if'
antecedent
apparent disagreement
complex question
ad ignorantiam
21. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
logic
equivocation
major term
obverse of a statement
22. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
chronological snobbery
extension
law of identity
apriorism
23. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
contrary
minor premise
amphiboly
contradiction
24. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
conclusion
logical equivalence
supported statements
composition
25. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
ambiguous
intension
subject
antecedent
26. An argument from lack of evidence
ad ignorantiam
formal logic
disagreement
ambiguous
27. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
subcontrariety
contrapositive of a statement
fallacies of form
mixed hypothetical syllogism
28. A hasty generalization
converse of a statement
apparent disagreement
apriorism
ad baculum
29. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
apparent disagreement
self-contradiction
fallacy of accent
ambiguous
30. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
equivocation
immediate reference
minor term
implication
31. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
schema
distributed term
obverse of a statement
intension
32. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
converse of a statement
implication
superimplication
contradiction
33. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
consequent
ambiguous
pure hypothetical syllogism
contrapositive of a statement
34. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
counterexample
middle term
subject
implication
35. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
immediate reference
division
square of oppisition
pure hypothetical syllogism
36. Contains the minor term
real disagreement
enthymeme
fallacies of form
minor premise
37. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
supported statements
exclusives
complement of a term
fallacy of distraction
38. The set of all terms not included in the given term
induction
either/or
complement of a term
argument`
39. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
schema
inclusive
complement of a term
self-supporting statements
40. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
circular reasoning
ad ignorantiam
ad hominem
fallacies of form
41. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
either/or
law of identity
inclusive
42. The science and art of reasoning well
logic
ad hominem
circular reasoning
ipse dixit
43. A statement cannot be both true and false
law of Non-Contradiction
contradiction
induction
tautology
44. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
ipse dixit
division
non sequitur
middle term
45. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
ad ignorantiam
real disagreement
circular reasoning
induction
46. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
law of excluded middle
division
subcontrariety
formal logic
47. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
circular reasoning
bulverism
obverse of a statement
ambiguous
48. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
subimplication
contrapositive of a statement
enthymeme
circular reasoning
49. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
valid
verbal disagreement
ad baculum
composition
50. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
major term
law of excluded middle
non sequitur