SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. An illegimate appeal to authority
logic
ipse dixit
equivocation
argument`
2. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
obverse of a statement
ambiguous
ad populum
3. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
immediate reference
verbal disagreement
ambiguous
quantity
4. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
either/or
subject
ad hominem
ipse dixit
5. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
major term
law of Non-Contradiction
argument`
obverse of a statement
6. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
valid
figure
subcontrariety
disagreement
7. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
verbal disagreement
fallacies of ambiguity
real disagreement
fallacy of accent
8. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
circular reasoning
subcontrariety
inclusive
9. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
supported statements
genus
equivocation
fallacy of distraction
10. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
mixed hypothetical syllogism
antecedent
contrapositive of a statement
11. The set of all terms not included in the given term
genus
complement of a term
argument`
subcontrariety
12. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
post hoc ergo propter hoc
fallacy of distraction
fallacy of accent
sound syllogism
13. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ambiguous
genus
ad baculum
conclusion
14. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
law of excluded middle
either/or
fallacy of accent
circular reasoning
15. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
apriorism
genus
categorical syllogism
contrary
16. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
counterexample
sound syllogism
tautology
mixed hypothetical syllogism
17. Is valid and has true premises
subcontrariety
hypothetical
sound syllogism
self-supporting statements
18. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
immediate reference
minor term
categorical syllogism
exclusives
19. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of identity
fallacies of ambiguity
sound syllogism
subject
20. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
non sequitur
inclusive
real disagreement
logical equivalence
21. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
major premise
ad populum
informal fallacy
contrary
22. A sentence which is either true or false
ipse dixit
subject
statement
conclusion
23. An argument from lack of evidence
ad baculum
composition
ad ignorantiam
pure hypothetical syllogism
24. A hasty generalization
bulverism
apriorism
sound syllogism
verbal disagreement
25. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
self-contradiction
major term
consistant
contradiction
26. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
logic
supported statements
inclusive
implication
27. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
middle term
categorical syllogism
logic
obverse of a statement
28. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
superimplication
self-supporting statements
exclusives
real disagreement
29. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
ipse dixit
converse of a statement
consequent
bulverism
30. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
mood
extension
tu quoque
exclusives
31. Any statement is either true or false
conclusion
distributed term
law of excluded middle
mixed hypothetical syllogism
32. The condition - the part following the 'if'
middle term
antecedent
ambiguous
self-contradiction
33. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
contrapositive of a statement
complex question
extension
figure
34. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
tautology
ad populum
mood
ad hominem
35. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
sound syllogism
ipse dixit
self-supporting statements
supported statements
36. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
non sequitur
intension
sound syllogism
law of identity
37. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
superimplication
either/or
informal fallacy
counterexample
38. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
contrapositive of a statement
fallacies of ambiguity
pure hypothetical syllogism
quantity
39. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
schema
ad populum
independance
equivocation
40. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
major premise
quantity
consistant
amphiboly
41. A concept that can be expressed precisely
sound syllogism
term
division
subject
42. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
enthymeme
real disagreement
converse of a statement
contradiction
43. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
law of identity
minor term
major premise
chronological snobbery
44. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
fallacy of accent
real disagreement
logical equivalence
categorical syllogism
45. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
exclusives
major premise
law of identity
verbal disagreement
46. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
real disagreement
counterexample
bulverism
47. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
hypothetical
division
sound syllogism
independance
48. The science and art of reasoning well
contrary
either/or
logic
antecedent
49. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
quantity
pure hypothetical syllogism
schema
self-contradiction
50. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
supported statements
exclusives
law of Non-Contradiction