SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
ad hominem
induction
tautology
post hoc ergo propter hoc
2. Contains the minor term
genus
square of oppisition
minor premise
obverse of a statement
3. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
inclusive
figure
exclusives
either/or
4. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
mood
categorical syllogism
square of oppisition
conclusion
5. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
schema
sound syllogism
obverse of a statement
self-supporting statements
6. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
composition
valid
converse of a statement
counterexample
7. An argument from lack of evidence
square of oppisition
ad baculum
ad ignorantiam
genus
8. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
mixed hypothetical syllogism
intension
logical equivalence
superimplication
9. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
hypothetical
tu quoque
verbal disagreement
valid
10. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
tu quoque
immediate reference
schema
11. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
intension
contradiction
extension
square of oppisition
12. An illegitimate appeal to force
post hoc ergo propter hoc
pure hypothetical syllogism
supported statements
ad baculum
13. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
contradiction
verbal disagreement
apriorism
obverse of a statement
14. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
tu quoque
contradiction
ipse dixit
ad baculum
15. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
apparent disagreement
superimplication
figure
16. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
intension
schema
extension
formal logic
17. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
superimplication
ad hominem
square of oppisition
sound syllogism
18. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
formal logic
major term
square of oppisition
supported statements
19. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
figure
law of excluded middle
major premise
post hoc ergo propter hoc
20. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
tu quoque
consistant
induction
law of Non-Contradiction
21. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
mixed hypothetical syllogism
major premise
self-contradiction
ad ignorantiam
22. A statement cannot be both true and false
logical equivalence
law of excluded middle
self-contradiction
law of Non-Contradiction
23. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
verbal disagreement
categorical syllogism
equivocation
supported statements
24. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
superimplication
counterexample
converse of a statement
mood
25. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
informal fallacy
mood
figure
fallacy of accent
26. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
supported statements
sound syllogism
ad hominem
real disagreement
27. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
contrary
subcontrariety
implication
circular reasoning
28. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
statement
ad hominem
conclusion
post hoc ergo propter hoc
29. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
exclusives
apparent disagreement
converse of a statement
complex question
30. A hasty generalization
apriorism
bulverism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
logical equivalence
31. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
independance
apriorism
logic
informal fallacy
32. A concept that can be expressed precisely
amphiboly
chronological snobbery
term
either/or
33. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
mood
subimplication
contrary
mixed hypothetical syllogism
34. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
equivocation
apriorism
fallacies of ambiguity
mixed hypothetical syllogism
35. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
complex question
ipse dixit
figure
chronological snobbery
36. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
minor term
argument`
sound syllogism
figure
37. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
ad hominem
contrapositive of a statement
induction
inclusive
38. Found once in each premise
circular reasoning
ambiguous
middle term
equivocation
39. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
minor term
inclusive
composition
immediate reference
40. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
logic
informal fallacy
exclusives
formal logic
41. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
self-supporting statements
verbal disagreement
valid
42. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
ipse dixit
fallacies of ambiguity
equivocation
43. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
self-supporting statements
hypothetical
self-contradiction
tautology
44. An illegimate appeal to authority
ipse dixit
contrary
quantity
genus
45. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
either/or
mood
formal logic
conclusion
46. The set of all terms not included in the given term
mixed hypothetical syllogism
complement of a term
counterexample
extension
47. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
post hoc ergo propter hoc
supported statements
law of excluded middle
either/or
48. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
bulverism
complement of a term
apriorism
49. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
circular reasoning
fallacy of distraction
extension
ad hominem
50. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
middle term
minor premise
converse of a statement
subcontrariety