SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. An illegitimate appeal to force
logical equivalence
mood
subject
ad baculum
2. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
division
figure
complement of a term
logic
3. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
contrary
extension
inclusive
4. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
informal fallacy
ad ignorantiam
figure
equivocation
5. The premise containing the major term
complement of a term
major premise
middle term
mixed hypothetical syllogism
6. The science and art of reasoning well
logic
disagreement
minor premise
subimplication
7. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
self-contradiction
mixed hypothetical syllogism
complex question
extension
8. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
subimplication
major premise
chronological snobbery
counterexample
9. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
informal fallacy
subimplication
valid
categorical syllogism
10. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
contrary
formal logic
ambiguous
equivocation
11. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
self-supporting statements
minor premise
ipse dixit
12. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
ad hominem
ipse dixit
disagreement
fallacy of distraction
13. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
bulverism
valid
formal logic
intension
14. A hasty generalization
self-supporting statements
subimplication
division
apriorism
15. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
apriorism
enthymeme
immediate reference
middle term
16. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
verbal disagreement
contradiction
converse of a statement
exclusives
17. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
complex question
real disagreement
law of excluded middle
post hoc ergo propter hoc
18. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
ad populum
hypothetical
argument`
ambiguous
19. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
subimplication
distributed term
equivocation
term
20. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
term
consistant
fallacy of accent
exclusives
21. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
inclusive
fallacies of form
intension
hypothetical
22. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
categorical syllogism
consistant
law of Non-Contradiction
subject
23. A statement cannot be both true and false
consequent
law of Non-Contradiction
bulverism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
24. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
argument`
complex question
composition
counterexample
25. An argument based merely on the passage of time
fallacies of ambiguity
immediate reference
chronological snobbery
exclusives
26. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
contradiction
contrary
independance
obverse of a statement
27. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
obverse of a statement
fallacy of accent
law of Non-Contradiction
logical equivalence
28. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
counterexample
immediate reference
law of excluded middle
genus
29. Is valid and has true premises
distributed term
contrapositive of a statement
sound syllogism
bulverism
30. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
immediate reference
tu quoque
supported statements
inclusive
31. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
real disagreement
exclusives
tu quoque
consistant
32. A sentence which is either true or false
major premise
circular reasoning
statement
self-supporting statements
33. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
square of oppisition
self-contradiction
implication
apriorism
34. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
pure hypothetical syllogism
argument`
induction
formal logic
35. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
ambiguous
real disagreement
amphiboly
exclusives
36. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
amphiboly
inclusive
independance
non sequitur
37. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
categorical syllogism
fallacies of form
ambiguous
consistant
38. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
major premise
formal logic
pure hypothetical syllogism
consequent
39. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
ipse dixit
ad ignorantiam
contrary
statement
40. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
conclusion
ad hominem
argument`
41. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
valid
major premise
consequent
subcontrariety
42. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
division
apriorism
statement
amphiboly
43. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
exclusives
major term
contrapositive of a statement
ad populum
44. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
major premise
induction
self-supporting statements
contradiction
45. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
subject
tu quoque
ad hominem
square of oppisition
46. A concept that can be expressed precisely
ambiguous
term
hypothetical
minor premise
47. Difference of opinion or perception
valid
amphiboly
apparent disagreement
implication
48. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
fallacy of accent
quantity
sound syllogism
conclusion
49. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ambiguous
disagreement
verbal disagreement
exclusives
50. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
minor premise
exclusives
term
ad hominem