SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
mixed hypothetical syllogism
apparent disagreement
statement
2. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
superimplication
logical equivalence
law of excluded middle
counterexample
3. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
post hoc ergo propter hoc
schema
consequent
major term
4. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
induction
minor term
genus
pure hypothetical syllogism
5. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
converse of a statement
law of identity
hypothetical
pure hypothetical syllogism
6. A concept that can be expressed precisely
supported statements
composition
formal logic
term
7. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
disagreement
term
obverse of a statement
argument`
8. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
real disagreement
complement of a term
non sequitur
fallacies of ambiguity
9. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
inclusive
ambiguous
obverse of a statement
logical equivalence
10. Any statement is either true or false
subject
immediate reference
law of excluded middle
either/or
11. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
categorical syllogism
consistant
immediate reference
fallacies of ambiguity
12. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
apparent disagreement
apriorism
ambiguous
law of identity
13. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
quantity
independance
contrapositive of a statement
logic
14. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
subject
consistant
minor term
complex question
15. An illegimate appeal to authority
composition
ipse dixit
contradiction
apparent disagreement
16. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
verbal disagreement
informal fallacy
amphiboly
apparent disagreement
17. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
square of oppisition
chronological snobbery
law of Non-Contradiction
inclusive
18. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
exclusives
subcontrariety
subject
enthymeme
19. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
inclusive
chronological snobbery
non sequitur
fallacy of distraction
20. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
disagreement
implication
categorical syllogism
equivocation
21. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
contrapositive of a statement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
extension
ad hominem
22. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
real disagreement
ad populum
independance
contrary
23. A statement cannot be both true and false
valid
law of Non-Contradiction
extension
mixed hypothetical syllogism
24. The science and art of reasoning well
contrapositive of a statement
sound syllogism
logic
complement of a term
25. Difference of opinion or perception
induction
extension
post hoc ergo propter hoc
apparent disagreement
26. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
self-contradiction
fallacies of form
antecedent
ipse dixit
27. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
real disagreement
major term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
composition
28. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
bulverism
argument`
obverse of a statement
minor term
29. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
genus
consistant
post hoc ergo propter hoc
logical equivalence
30. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
implication
fallacy of distraction
fallacies of ambiguity
formal logic
31. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
genus
consistant
disagreement
fallacies of ambiguity
32. An argument from lack of evidence
ad ignorantiam
division
non sequitur
supported statements
33. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
sound syllogism
conclusion
argument`
independance
34. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
intension
superimplication
formal logic
valid
35. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
inclusive
apparent disagreement
division
fallacy of accent
36. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
fallacy of distraction
fallacy of accent
argument`
supported statements
37. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
schema
ad ignorantiam
major term
pure hypothetical syllogism
38. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
subcontrariety
circular reasoning
tautology
subimplication
39. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
apparent disagreement
sound syllogism
counterexample
major term
40. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
minor term
mixed hypothetical syllogism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
complex question
41. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
self-contradiction
intension
fallacy of accent
logical equivalence
42. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
quantity
non sequitur
subimplication
logical equivalence
43. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacies of form
fallacy of accent
quantity
minor term
44. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
apparent disagreement
square of oppisition
categorical syllogism
disagreement
45. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
implication
schema
chronological snobbery
subcontrariety
46. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
logical equivalence
equivocation
enthymeme
contradiction
47. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
formal logic
converse of a statement
ad baculum
48. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
extension
bulverism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
argument`
49. Found once in each premise
middle term
apparent disagreement
contrapositive of a statement
extension
50. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
logic
hypothetical
antecedent
real disagreement