SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
valid
counterexample
tautology
sound syllogism
2. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
ad populum
categorical syllogism
statement
fallacy of distraction
3. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
formal logic
statement
quantity
fallacy of accent
4. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
ad ignorantiam
non sequitur
post hoc ergo propter hoc
mixed hypothetical syllogism
5. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
intension
circular reasoning
pure hypothetical syllogism
tu quoque
6. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
middle term
fallacies of form
conclusion
equivocation
7. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
minor term
tu quoque
quantity
sound syllogism
8. A hasty generalization
apriorism
subimplication
apparent disagreement
informal fallacy
9. An argument based merely on the passage of time
chronological snobbery
categorical syllogism
subject
distributed term
10. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of identity
schema
hypothetical
fallacies of form
11. Is valid and has true premises
self-supporting statements
non sequitur
pure hypothetical syllogism
sound syllogism
12. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
statement
self-contradiction
post hoc ergo propter hoc
13. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
formal logic
consequent
amphiboly
verbal disagreement
14. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
apriorism
conclusion
real disagreement
logic
15. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
self-supporting statements
either/or
counterexample
verbal disagreement
16. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
major term
quantity
amphiboly
mixed hypothetical syllogism
17. A concept that can be expressed precisely
middle term
term
major term
ipse dixit
18. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
subimplication
implication
term
schema
19. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
middle term
self-supporting statements
logic
contradiction
20. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
enthymeme
informal fallacy
conclusion
logic
21. An argument from lack of evidence
self-contradiction
chronological snobbery
ad ignorantiam
term
22. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
disagreement
ambiguous
counterexample
ad hominem
23. A statement cannot be both true and false
chronological snobbery
law of Non-Contradiction
subject
ambiguous
24. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
superimplication
law of Non-Contradiction
informal fallacy
minor term
25. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
self-contradiction
amphiboly
consequent
apparent disagreement
26. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
valid
inclusive
minor term
term
27. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
extension
tautology
chronological snobbery
mood
28. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
square of oppisition
conclusion
supported statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
29. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
genus
converse of a statement
complement of a term
disagreement
30. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
either/or
composition
pure hypothetical syllogism
division
31. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
enthymeme
bulverism
figure
amphiboly
32. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
antecedent
implication
statement
self-supporting statements
33. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
exclusives
ambiguous
minor premise
obverse of a statement
34. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
division
law of excluded middle
induction
either/or
35. The science and art of reasoning well
independance
logic
mixed hypothetical syllogism
minor premise
36. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
genus
ad ignorantiam
non sequitur
conclusion
37. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
ad baculum
bulverism
contrapositive of a statement
subimplication
38. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
real disagreement
either/or
equivocation
categorical syllogism
39. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
pure hypothetical syllogism
disagreement
apparent disagreement
consistant
40. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
inclusive
verbal disagreement
enthymeme
either/or
41. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
bulverism
fallacies of form
circular reasoning
law of excluded middle
42. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
immediate reference
non sequitur
valid
equivocation
43. Any statement is either true or false
statement
contradiction
law of excluded middle
contrary
44. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
logic
extension
composition
ad ignorantiam
45. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
conclusion
division
induction
hypothetical
46. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
ad populum
real disagreement
complex question
valid
47. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
either/or
major premise
contradiction
intension
48. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
composition
hypothetical
fallacy of distraction
immediate reference
49. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
contrary
subcontrariety
major premise
non sequitur
50. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
informal fallacy
antecedent
law of identity
subject