SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
disagreement
real disagreement
sound syllogism
contrapositive of a statement
2. Difference of opinion or perception
division
apparent disagreement
induction
inclusive
3. An argument from lack of evidence
law of Non-Contradiction
ad ignorantiam
sound syllogism
schema
4. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
implication
fallacies of ambiguity
circular reasoning
pure hypothetical syllogism
5. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
contrary
independance
categorical syllogism
consistant
6. Is valid and has true premises
ad ignorantiam
sound syllogism
law of excluded middle
consistant
7. Found once in each premise
middle term
informal fallacy
minor premise
sound syllogism
8. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
ad ignorantiam
law of Non-Contradiction
genus
contrary
9. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
contradiction
ad populum
subject
tautology
10. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
logical equivalence
amphiboly
argument`
figure
11. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
bulverism
tu quoque
chronological snobbery
major premise
12. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
figure
extension
fallacies of ambiguity
converse of a statement
13. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
logical equivalence
consequent
mixed hypothetical syllogism
verbal disagreement
14. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
categorical syllogism
circular reasoning
complement of a term
pure hypothetical syllogism
15. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
consequent
composition
fallacies of form
consistant
16. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
contrapositive of a statement
induction
term
logic
17. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
mood
ambiguous
formal logic
induction
18. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
fallacies of ambiguity
ad hominem
square of oppisition
converse of a statement
19. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
valid
logical equivalence
extension
major term
20. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ambiguous
informal fallacy
verbal disagreement
term
21. A hasty generalization
verbal disagreement
apriorism
counterexample
distributed term
22. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
logical equivalence
amphiboly
contrapositive of a statement
chronological snobbery
23. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
equivocation
apriorism
inclusive
apparent disagreement
24. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
contradiction
independance
self-contradiction
contrary
25. A statement cannot be both true and false
valid
contradiction
bulverism
law of Non-Contradiction
26. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
ambiguous
tautology
post hoc ergo propter hoc
minor term
27. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
logic
extension
counterexample
equivocation
28. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
subcontrariety
bulverism
fallacies of ambiguity
mood
29. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
distributed term
fallacy of accent
bulverism
mood
30. The condition - the part following the 'if'
complex question
antecedent
sound syllogism
superimplication
31. A concept that can be expressed precisely
formal logic
self-supporting statements
tu quoque
term
32. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
contrary
extension
informal fallacy
subject
33. An illegimate appeal to authority
ipse dixit
categorical syllogism
hypothetical
tautology
34. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of identity
fallacy of distraction
major premise
converse of a statement
35. An argument based merely on the passage of time
consistant
logical equivalence
chronological snobbery
major term
36. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
complex question
hypothetical
consistant
logic
37. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
ambiguous
implication
self-supporting statements
extension
38. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
conclusion
equivocation
pure hypothetical syllogism
ad populum
39. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
subimplication
fallacy of distraction
argument`
valid
40. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
formal logic
minor premise
real disagreement
41. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
statement
fallacy of distraction
circular reasoning
ad hominem
42. An illegitimate appeal to force
contradiction
hypothetical
real disagreement
ad baculum
43. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
law of Non-Contradiction
apparent disagreement
logical equivalence
subcontrariety
44. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
hypothetical
contrapositive of a statement
inclusive
enthymeme
45. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
exclusives
division
post hoc ergo propter hoc
subject
46. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
ad ignorantiam
antecedent
ad populum
square of oppisition
47. The science and art of reasoning well
verbal disagreement
tautology
logic
exclusives
48. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
ad populum
consequent
mixed hypothetical syllogism
logical equivalence
49. The set of all terms not included in the given term
ambiguous
hypothetical
supported statements
complement of a term
50. Any statement is either true or false
contradiction
law of excluded middle
law of Non-Contradiction
tu quoque