SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
ad populum
figure
obverse of a statement
contrapositive of a statement
2. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
sound syllogism
consequent
inclusive
non sequitur
3. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
subject
division
subcontrariety
law of Non-Contradiction
4. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
square of oppisition
apparent disagreement
major term
division
5. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
post hoc ergo propter hoc
consistant
extension
fallacies of form
6. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
amphiboly
verbal disagreement
minor term
contradiction
7. A statement cannot be both true and false
law of Non-Contradiction
law of identity
superimplication
middle term
8. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
exclusives
argument`
mood
contrary
9. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
consistant
pure hypothetical syllogism
subimplication
inclusive
10. An illegitimate appeal to force
term
ad baculum
fallacies of form
ad populum
11. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
self-contradiction
subimplication
pure hypothetical syllogism
fallacies of form
12. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
post hoc ergo propter hoc
extension
mood
quantity
13. The condition - the part following the 'if'
formal logic
self-contradiction
argument`
antecedent
14. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
self-supporting statements
valid
supported statements
apriorism
15. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
division
enthymeme
immediate reference
16. The premise containing the major term
major premise
argument`
tu quoque
ambiguous
17. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
square of oppisition
minor term
implication
supported statements
18. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
conclusion
contrary
major term
complex question
19. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
categorical syllogism
argument`
tautology
formal logic
20. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
contrary
self-contradiction
consequent
self-supporting statements
21. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
logic
consistant
self-contradiction
informal fallacy
22. An argument from lack of evidence
logical equivalence
ad ignorantiam
ad baculum
major premise
23. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
supported statements
conclusion
circular reasoning
distributed term
24. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
sound syllogism
pure hypothetical syllogism
tu quoque
real disagreement
25. If a statement is true - then it is true
complement of a term
extension
fallacy of accent
law of identity
26. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
immediate reference
contrapositive of a statement
figure
mood
27. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
ad ignorantiam
disagreement
complex question
28. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
self-supporting statements
subcontrariety
ad ignorantiam
ad baculum
29. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
obverse of a statement
minor term
induction
equivocation
30. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
chronological snobbery
contradiction
tautology
enthymeme
31. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
composition
converse of a statement
real disagreement
ad hominem
32. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
bulverism
quantity
intension
subimplication
33. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
middle term
hypothetical
supported statements
34. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
division
post hoc ergo propter hoc
fallacies of ambiguity
independance
35. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
superimplication
implication
non sequitur
equivocation
36. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
immediate reference
categorical syllogism
genus
chronological snobbery
37. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
obverse of a statement
complex question
logic
converse of a statement
38. Found once in each premise
statement
middle term
argument`
minor premise
39. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ad populum
law of identity
ambiguous
40. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
counterexample
subject
informal fallacy
contrapositive of a statement
41. A sentence which is either true or false
quantity
statement
law of identity
ipse dixit
42. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
fallacy of accent
obverse of a statement
ambiguous
ad hominem
43. A concept that can be expressed precisely
apparent disagreement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
term
induction
44. The science and art of reasoning well
logic
ad populum
subject
consistant
45. A hasty generalization
quantity
antecedent
apriorism
major premise
46. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
statement
bulverism
inclusive
disagreement
47. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
converse of a statement
either/or
hypothetical
pure hypothetical syllogism
48. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
fallacies of ambiguity
non sequitur
law of identity
hypothetical
49. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
tautology
immediate reference
schema
pure hypothetical syllogism
50. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
converse of a statement
logical equivalence
minor term
subcontrariety