SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
post hoc ergo propter hoc
complex question
mixed hypothetical syllogism
categorical syllogism
2. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
conclusion
statement
contrapositive of a statement
contrary
3. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
law of identity
tautology
exclusives
fallacy of accent
4. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
fallacies of ambiguity
ambiguous
counterexample
minor premise
5. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
mixed hypothetical syllogism
verbal disagreement
induction
tu quoque
6. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
formal logic
intension
chronological snobbery
schema
7. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
enthymeme
ad baculum
implication
contrapositive of a statement
8. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
statement
hypothetical
superimplication
tu quoque
9. The science and art of reasoning well
fallacies of ambiguity
contrapositive of a statement
logic
implication
10. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
genus
apriorism
intension
independance
11. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
real disagreement
immediate reference
supported statements
genus
12. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
amphiboly
law of excluded middle
composition
13. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
amphiboly
self-supporting statements
induction
non sequitur
14. Contains the minor term
minor premise
mood
complement of a term
sound syllogism
15. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
converse of a statement
fallacies of ambiguity
genus
subimplication
16. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
post hoc ergo propter hoc
self-contradiction
division
apparent disagreement
17. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
mood
antecedent
immediate reference
either/or
18. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
superimplication
distributed term
equivocation
law of excluded middle
19. The set of all terms not included in the given term
complement of a term
division
hypothetical
exclusives
20. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
hypothetical
counterexample
extension
fallacies of form
21. An illegimate appeal to authority
categorical syllogism
informal fallacy
ipse dixit
tu quoque
22. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
ipse dixit
self-supporting statements
consequent
schema
23. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
ad hominem
mixed hypothetical syllogism
sound syllogism
exclusives
24. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
circular reasoning
real disagreement
either/or
equivocation
25. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
logical equivalence
fallacy of distraction
formal logic
superimplication
26. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
major term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
square of oppisition
disagreement
27. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
inclusive
square of oppisition
fallacies of form
schema
28. Any statement is either true or false
logical equivalence
law of excluded middle
categorical syllogism
complement of a term
29. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
verbal disagreement
superimplication
immediate reference
bulverism
30. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
supported statements
independance
intension
contradiction
31. A concept that can be expressed precisely
term
real disagreement
sound syllogism
induction
32. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
minor term
informal fallacy
conclusion
mixed hypothetical syllogism
33. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
either/or
converse of a statement
term
subcontrariety
34. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
antecedent
square of oppisition
contrary
apriorism
35. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
implication
subcontrariety
middle term
inclusive
36. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
tu quoque
ad populum
formal logic
obverse of a statement
37. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
apparent disagreement
consequent
term
extension
38. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
either/or
ad baculum
statement
tautology
39. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
law of excluded middle
composition
ambiguous
counterexample
40. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
categorical syllogism
consistant
ad hominem
mixed hypothetical syllogism
41. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacies of ambiguity
amphiboly
informal fallacy
major term
42. The premise containing the major term
major premise
ad hominem
amphiboly
term
43. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
contrary
exclusives
fallacy of distraction
44. Found once in each premise
immediate reference
middle term
consequent
figure
45. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
distributed term
statement
valid
antecedent
46. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
informal fallacy
counterexample
logical equivalence
minor premise
47. Difference of opinion or perception
tu quoque
distributed term
apparent disagreement
converse of a statement
48. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
disagreement
middle term
division
ad hominem
49. A hasty generalization
obverse of a statement
quantity
counterexample
apriorism
50. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
contradiction
non sequitur
figure
chronological snobbery