SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. An argument based merely on the passage of time
chronological snobbery
logic
circular reasoning
schema
2. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
apriorism
ipse dixit
pure hypothetical syllogism
ambiguous
3. Any statement is either true or false
valid
logic
law of excluded middle
non sequitur
4. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
schema
apriorism
major term
inclusive
5. An illegitimate appeal to force
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ad baculum
hypothetical
obverse of a statement
6. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
ad populum
formal logic
logical equivalence
disagreement
7. Contains the minor term
contrapositive of a statement
pure hypothetical syllogism
minor premise
term
8. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
pure hypothetical syllogism
law of identity
ambiguous
consistant
9. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
apparent disagreement
ad hominem
contrapositive of a statement
induction
10. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
law of Non-Contradiction
complex question
chronological snobbery
11. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
square of oppisition
superimplication
division
law of identity
12. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
contrary
major term
disagreement
subimplication
13. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
complex question
self-supporting statements
law of identity
contradiction
14. The condition - the part following the 'if'
antecedent
tautology
converse of a statement
argument`
15. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
hypothetical
formal logic
mixed hypothetical syllogism
composition
16. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
ad baculum
verbal disagreement
obverse of a statement
composition
17. If a statement is true - then it is true
contrapositive of a statement
exclusives
counterexample
law of identity
18. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
enthymeme
either/or
amphiboly
non sequitur
19. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
induction
argument`
immediate reference
subcontrariety
20. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
fallacy of accent
equivocation
antecedent
distributed term
21. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
fallacy of distraction
ad baculum
counterexample
schema
22. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
subcontrariety
logical equivalence
division
real disagreement
23. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
hypothetical
self-supporting statements
fallacies of form
schema
24. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
division
implication
pure hypothetical syllogism
counterexample
25. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
ambiguous
enthymeme
contradiction
induction
26. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
law of Non-Contradiction
post hoc ergo propter hoc
minor premise
disagreement
27. An illegimate appeal to authority
fallacies of ambiguity
induction
ipse dixit
genus
28. The science and art of reasoning well
induction
logic
either/or
ad hominem
29. A hasty generalization
ad populum
mood
argument`
apriorism
30. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
composition
supported statements
induction
31. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
counterexample
minor term
implication
quantity
32. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
quantity
ad hominem
law of excluded middle
exclusives
33. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
apriorism
pure hypothetical syllogism
either/or
equivocation
34. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
intension
pure hypothetical syllogism
middle term
fallacy of accent
35. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
circular reasoning
apriorism
disagreement
self-supporting statements
36. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
equivocation
distributed term
immediate reference
apparent disagreement
37. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacies of ambiguity
hypothetical
genus
ad ignorantiam
38. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
enthymeme
independance
minor term
disagreement
39. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
contradiction
fallacy of distraction
schema
exclusives
40. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
non sequitur
apparent disagreement
schema
converse of a statement
41. The set of all terms not included in the given term
antecedent
complement of a term
apriorism
non sequitur
42. An argument from lack of evidence
contrary
ad ignorantiam
consequent
informal fallacy
43. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
categorical syllogism
verbal disagreement
contrapositive of a statement
self-supporting statements
44. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
major term
apparent disagreement
mood
contrary
45. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
mixed hypothetical syllogism
ad baculum
self-contradiction
implication
46. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
pure hypothetical syllogism
formal logic
hypothetical
contrary
47. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
bulverism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
pure hypothetical syllogism
formal logic
48. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
law of identity
contradiction
complex question
extension
49. Difference of opinion or perception
tu quoque
verbal disagreement
composition
apparent disagreement
50. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
self-supporting statements
law of excluded middle
intension
distributed term