SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
tautology
superimplication
supported statements
2. The premise containing the major term
major premise
major term
conclusion
immediate reference
3. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
consequent
ad hominem
inclusive
mixed hypothetical syllogism
4. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
conclusion
verbal disagreement
independance
contrary
5. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
figure
consistant
quantity
equivocation
6. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
immediate reference
division
mixed hypothetical syllogism
law of Non-Contradiction
7. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
converse of a statement
square of oppisition
valid
genus
8. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
converse of a statement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
pure hypothetical syllogism
ambiguous
9. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
figure
supported statements
self-supporting statements
schema
10. Contains the minor term
tu quoque
minor premise
complement of a term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
11. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
consistant
tautology
immediate reference
contradiction
12. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
categorical syllogism
intension
middle term
bulverism
13. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
amphiboly
contrary
schema
minor term
14. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
distributed term
exclusives
square of oppisition
ad ignorantiam
15. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ambiguous
fallacies of ambiguity
division
hypothetical
16. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
real disagreement
ad populum
self-contradiction
implication
17. An argument from lack of evidence
ad ignorantiam
apriorism
immediate reference
sound syllogism
18. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
disagreement
law of identity
bulverism
enthymeme
19. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
ambiguous
conclusion
self-supporting statements
counterexample
20. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of identity
law of Non-Contradiction
independance
distributed term
21. The set of all terms not included in the given term
circular reasoning
minor term
complement of a term
induction
22. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
complex question
valid
antecedent
chronological snobbery
23. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
formal logic
ad hominem
circular reasoning
law of excluded middle
24. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
disagreement
non sequitur
fallacy of distraction
informal fallacy
25. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
contradiction
valid
inclusive
fallacies of ambiguity
26. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
real disagreement
implication
ad populum
equivocation
27. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
ad baculum
amphiboly
counterexample
subject
28. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacies of ambiguity
circular reasoning
minor premise
implication
29. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
minor term
non sequitur
contradiction
enthymeme
30. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
mood
extension
converse of a statement
term
31. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
converse of a statement
fallacy of accent
law of Non-Contradiction
square of oppisition
32. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
extension
exclusives
self-supporting statements
logical equivalence
33. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
intension
ad hominem
major term
contradiction
34. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
major term
valid
immediate reference
division
35. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
contrapositive of a statement
ad hominem
disagreement
square of oppisition
36. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
division
informal fallacy
major premise
bulverism
37. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad hominem
enthymeme
figure
minor premise
38. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
minor term
categorical syllogism
minor premise
tautology
39. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
fallacies of form
post hoc ergo propter hoc
complement of a term
square of oppisition
40. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
complex question
logical equivalence
contradiction
ipse dixit
41. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
logic
intension
self-contradiction
middle term
42. A hasty generalization
circular reasoning
subcontrariety
ambiguous
apriorism
43. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
statement
major term
informal fallacy
44. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
pure hypothetical syllogism
either/or
fallacies of ambiguity
distributed term
45. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
antecedent
consistant
circular reasoning
induction
46. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
statement
tu quoque
immediate reference
fallacy of accent
47. A sentence which is either true or false
minor premise
conclusion
statement
logical equivalence
48. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
contrary
ambiguous
subimplication
contradiction
49. An illegimate appeal to authority
term
ipse dixit
subimplication
logic
50. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
independance
distributed term
complement of a term