SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. An argument from lack of evidence
law of identity
induction
ad ignorantiam
subject
2. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
formal logic
independance
intension
valid
3. A hasty generalization
logic
supported statements
apriorism
division
4. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
subcontrariety
implication
composition
valid
5. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
pure hypothetical syllogism
immediate reference
consistant
division
6. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
statement
circular reasoning
equivocation
counterexample
7. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
distributed term
extension
conclusion
composition
8. An illegitimate appeal to force
argument`
sound syllogism
minor premise
ad baculum
9. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
ambiguous
non sequitur
superimplication
mood
10. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
logical equivalence
post hoc ergo propter hoc
apriorism
subcontrariety
11. A concept that can be expressed precisely
complement of a term
apriorism
term
consistant
12. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
sound syllogism
fallacy of distraction
complex question
categorical syllogism
13. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
consequent
supported statements
apparent disagreement
fallacy of accent
14. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
conclusion
consequent
term
non sequitur
15. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
disagreement
major premise
self-supporting statements
non sequitur
16. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
exclusives
categorical syllogism
consistant
quantity
17. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
independance
complement of a term
genus
bulverism
18. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
mood
categorical syllogism
hypothetical
19. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
implication
square of oppisition
law of excluded middle
contrary
20. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
intension
post hoc ergo propter hoc
categorical syllogism
division
21. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
complement of a term
self-supporting statements
amphiboly
22. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
distributed term
law of excluded middle
ad populum
supported statements
23. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
figure
either/or
division
major term
24. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
major premise
square of oppisition
major term
law of excluded middle
25. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
converse of a statement
induction
inclusive
implication
26. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
fallacy of distraction
apriorism
either/or
formal logic
27. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
counterexample
obverse of a statement
inclusive
tu quoque
28. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
subject
inclusive
fallacies of ambiguity
formal logic
29. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
sound syllogism
self-supporting statements
30. A statement cannot be both true and false
either/or
logic
ad baculum
law of Non-Contradiction
31. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
division
inclusive
major premise
exclusives
32. An illegimate appeal to authority
ipse dixit
subcontrariety
law of identity
extension
33. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
immediate reference
tu quoque
composition
verbal disagreement
34. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
hypothetical
argument`
minor premise
induction
35. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
hypothetical
ad populum
argument`
complement of a term
36. Contains the minor term
subcontrariety
minor premise
fallacies of ambiguity
implication
37. An argument based merely on the passage of time
induction
distributed term
chronological snobbery
complex question
38. If a statement is true - then it is true
subimplication
informal fallacy
law of identity
supported statements
39. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
real disagreement
distributed term
quantity
apparent disagreement
40. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
extension
exclusives
contradiction
converse of a statement
41. Difference of opinion or perception
obverse of a statement
apparent disagreement
subject
minor premise
42. Is valid and has true premises
sound syllogism
induction
real disagreement
counterexample
43. A sentence which is either true or false
conclusion
minor term
contrary
statement
44. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
fallacies of ambiguity
antecedent
minor premise
implication
45. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
logic
contrapositive of a statement
fallacies of form
conclusion
46. The set of all terms not included in the given term
complement of a term
obverse of a statement
exclusives
statement
47. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
mood
categorical syllogism
tautology
minor premise
48. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
valid
disagreement
independance
middle term
49. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
superimplication
enthymeme
valid
50. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
extension
fallacies of ambiguity
ambiguous
minor premise