SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
non sequitur
informal fallacy
valid
consistant
2. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
disagreement
contrapositive of a statement
consequent
complement of a term
3. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
middle term
verbal disagreement
fallacy of distraction
antecedent
4. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
division
consistant
tautology
formal logic
5. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
subject
inclusive
supported statements
categorical syllogism
6. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
intension
ad populum
apparent disagreement
categorical syllogism
7. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
verbal disagreement
contrary
term
subimplication
8. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
counterexample
quantity
non sequitur
logic
9. The science and art of reasoning well
consequent
bulverism
tu quoque
logic
10. Contains the minor term
schema
major term
inclusive
minor premise
11. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
verbal disagreement
self-contradiction
apriorism
exclusives
12. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
converse of a statement
implication
statement
figure
13. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
sound syllogism
subcontrariety
contrapositive of a statement
consistant
14. A concept that can be expressed precisely
contrary
term
apriorism
law of identity
15. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
contrary
induction
immediate reference
law of Non-Contradiction
16. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
consequent
independance
immediate reference
17. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
subimplication
figure
consequent
mood
18. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
ad ignorantiam
consequent
sound syllogism
subimplication
19. The premise containing the major term
fallacies of form
major premise
contrapositive of a statement
extension
20. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
square of oppisition
exclusives
fallacy of accent
bulverism
21. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
fallacy of distraction
bulverism
logical equivalence
supported statements
22. An illegitimate appeal to force
figure
ad baculum
complement of a term
enthymeme
23. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
self-contradiction
consistant
figure
circular reasoning
24. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
law of Non-Contradiction
equivocation
valid
categorical syllogism
25. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
categorical syllogism
ambiguous
logic
law of identity
26. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
supported statements
non sequitur
statement
chronological snobbery
27. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
contrary
statement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
ad baculum
28. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
implication
consistant
tu quoque
real disagreement
29. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
genus
ad hominem
supported statements
30. Is valid and has true premises
complex question
independance
sound syllogism
fallacy of distraction
31. Any statement is either true or false
ambiguous
consequent
law of excluded middle
subject
32. The set of all terms not included in the given term
immediate reference
complement of a term
sound syllogism
apriorism
33. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
formal logic
enthymeme
informal fallacy
subimplication
34. An illegimate appeal to authority
inclusive
major premise
self-supporting statements
ipse dixit
35. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
valid
logical equivalence
consequent
converse of a statement
36. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
mood
extension
formal logic
mixed hypothetical syllogism
37. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
either/or
verbal disagreement
subject
law of Non-Contradiction
38. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
immediate reference
major term
square of oppisition
superimplication
39. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
immediate reference
fallacy of distraction
subcontrariety
subject
40. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
minor term
conclusion
argument`
consequent
41. The condition - the part following the 'if'
ad hominem
consequent
antecedent
equivocation
42. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
distributed term
contradiction
immediate reference
fallacy of distraction
43. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
immediate reference
square of oppisition
complex question
formal logic
44. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
fallacies of form
mixed hypothetical syllogism
formal logic
composition
45. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
contrary
antecedent
self-supporting statements
informal fallacy
46. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
counterexample
apriorism
informal fallacy
square of oppisition
47. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
law of excluded middle
ad baculum
mood
complex question
48. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacy of accent
consistant
ad baculum
subimplication
49. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
pure hypothetical syllogism
converse of a statement
disagreement
informal fallacy
50. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of identity
argument`
formal logic
apparent disagreement