SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
logic
major premise
enthymeme
consistant
2. The condition - the part following the 'if'
contrapositive of a statement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
square of oppisition
antecedent
3. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
minor premise
hypothetical
contradiction
apriorism
4. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
major premise
extension
valid
term
5. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
consequent
argument`
statement
fallacies of form
6. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
equivocation
superimplication
hypothetical
non sequitur
7. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
informal fallacy
complex question
schema
hypothetical
8. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
formal logic
fallacy of accent
ad ignorantiam
contrary
9. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
complex question
independance
non sequitur
tautology
10. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
amphiboly
supported statements
complex question
circular reasoning
11. A statement cannot be both true and false
statement
law of Non-Contradiction
contradiction
fallacy of accent
12. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
conclusion
mixed hypothetical syllogism
law of Non-Contradiction
supported statements
13. Is valid and has true premises
sound syllogism
statement
subcontrariety
real disagreement
14. A concept that can be expressed precisely
converse of a statement
term
major term
disagreement
15. Contains the minor term
exclusives
minor premise
statement
distributed term
16. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
verbal disagreement
law of Non-Contradiction
inclusive
implication
17. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
obverse of a statement
bulverism
ad hominem
composition
18. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
ambiguous
superimplication
distributed term
statement
19. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
major term
immediate reference
complex question
tautology
20. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
major term
minor term
supported statements
ad baculum
21. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
exclusives
consequent
circular reasoning
major premise
22. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ipse dixit
chronological snobbery
contradiction
23. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
supported statements
contrary
square of oppisition
figure
24. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
sound syllogism
bulverism
ad baculum
argument`
25. Difference of opinion or perception
informal fallacy
induction
law of Non-Contradiction
apparent disagreement
26. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
argument`
distributed term
subimplication
real disagreement
27. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
disagreement
division
immediate reference
non sequitur
28. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
division
apparent disagreement
fallacy of distraction
statement
29. An illegimate appeal to authority
induction
ipse dixit
term
ambiguous
30. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
argument`
self-supporting statements
consequent
valid
31. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
logical equivalence
minor term
extension
induction
32. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
ambiguous
extension
supported statements
major term
33. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
superimplication
tu quoque
converse of a statement
independance
34. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
exclusives
law of Non-Contradiction
law of identity
contrary
35. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
real disagreement
statement
argument`
36. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
mixed hypothetical syllogism
apparent disagreement
subcontrariety
circular reasoning
37. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
disagreement
minor premise
tautology
middle term
38. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
converse of a statement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
logical equivalence
minor premise
39. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
complement of a term
self-contradiction
induction
enthymeme
40. An argument based merely on the passage of time
consequent
quantity
hypothetical
chronological snobbery
41. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
mood
major premise
complex question
42. The science and art of reasoning well
logic
complement of a term
law of excluded middle
tu quoque
43. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
hypothetical
supported statements
ad baculum
real disagreement
44. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
extension
composition
law of excluded middle
contrapositive of a statement
45. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
either/or
contrapositive of a statement
intension
apparent disagreement
46. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
logical equivalence
minor term
tu quoque
mood
47. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
bulverism
formal logic
categorical syllogism
law of identity
48. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
intension
consequent
extension
independance
49. Found once in each premise
converse of a statement
fallacy of accent
post hoc ergo propter hoc
middle term
50. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
categorical syllogism
apriorism
term