SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
extension
fallacy of distraction
hypothetical
consistant
2. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
converse of a statement
square of oppisition
argument`
subimplication
3. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
genus
independance
conclusion
consistant
4. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
subject
self-supporting statements
complement of a term
valid
5. Is valid and has true premises
supported statements
fallacy of accent
sound syllogism
circular reasoning
6. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
complex question
exclusives
categorical syllogism
consistant
7. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
conclusion
ambiguous
argument`
subcontrariety
8. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
induction
genus
non sequitur
valid
9. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
contrapositive of a statement
equivocation
real disagreement
law of identity
10. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
complex question
distributed term
middle term
square of oppisition
11. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
law of identity
square of oppisition
equivocation
contrapositive of a statement
12. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
division
fallacies of ambiguity
genus
logic
13. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
law of excluded middle
formal logic
apriorism
contrapositive of a statement
14. Found once in each premise
middle term
mood
pure hypothetical syllogism
tu quoque
15. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
superimplication
inclusive
mixed hypothetical syllogism
distributed term
16. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
disagreement
antecedent
genus
law of identity
17. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
exclusives
fallacies of ambiguity
figure
hypothetical
18. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
superimplication
antecedent
implication
exclusives
19. A statement cannot be both true and false
contradiction
independance
conclusion
law of Non-Contradiction
20. Any statement is either true or false
fallacies of ambiguity
post hoc ergo propter hoc
law of excluded middle
composition
21. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
fallacy of accent
immediate reference
ad baculum
consistant
22. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
contrary
intension
exclusives
circular reasoning
23. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
composition
quantity
formal logic
inclusive
24. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
obverse of a statement
major premise
circular reasoning
post hoc ergo propter hoc
25. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
exclusives
quantity
subimplication
conclusion
26. A sentence which is either true or false
composition
statement
term
major premise
27. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
exclusives
real disagreement
amphiboly
self-contradiction
28. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
logical equivalence
contrary
formal logic
distributed term
29. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
major term
contrary
apriorism
minor premise
30. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
consequent
consistant
law of excluded middle
square of oppisition
31. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
exclusives
distributed term
informal fallacy
consistant
32. Difference of opinion or perception
independance
apparent disagreement
pure hypothetical syllogism
formal logic
33. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
self-supporting statements
composition
conclusion
immediate reference
34. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
bulverism
independance
amphiboly
enthymeme
35. Contains the minor term
enthymeme
contrapositive of a statement
division
minor premise
36. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
division
distributed term
fallacy of accent
amphiboly
37. An argument from lack of evidence
minor term
self-contradiction
ad ignorantiam
ad hominem
38. An argument based merely on the passage of time
equivocation
counterexample
chronological snobbery
self-contradiction
39. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
ad populum
equivocation
term
fallacies of form
40. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
contrary
valid
consistant
apriorism
41. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
antecedent
independance
self-contradiction
contrary
42. An illegimate appeal to authority
superimplication
apparent disagreement
mood
ipse dixit
43. The set of all terms not included in the given term
mood
complement of a term
statement
ad ignorantiam
44. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
division
implication
fallacy of distraction
45. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad baculum
hypothetical
bulverism
ad hominem
46. A concept that can be expressed precisely
term
pure hypothetical syllogism
contrary
fallacy of accent
47. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
major premise
conclusion
equivocation
argument`
48. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
sound syllogism
converse of a statement
law of identity
circular reasoning
49. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
extension
logic
tautology
post hoc ergo propter hoc
50. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
valid
argument`
pure hypothetical syllogism
mood