SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
real disagreement
self-supporting statements
minor premise
inclusive
2. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
sound syllogism
law of Non-Contradiction
tautology
logic
3. If a statement is true - then it is true
ad populum
ad hominem
statement
law of identity
4. The science and art of reasoning well
quantity
amphiboly
self-contradiction
logic
5. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
tautology
self-contradiction
intension
enthymeme
6. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
obverse of a statement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
statement
tu quoque
7. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
mixed hypothetical syllogism
amphiboly
middle term
division
8. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
inclusive
ad populum
valid
contrapositive of a statement
9. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
ad populum
independance
bulverism
subcontrariety
10. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
subimplication
superimplication
ipse dixit
informal fallacy
11. Is valid and has true premises
sound syllogism
self-contradiction
tu quoque
quantity
12. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
mood
logic
self-supporting statements
immediate reference
13. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
subject
contradiction
tu quoque
antecedent
14. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
disagreement
statement
consequent
formal logic
15. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
square of oppisition
extension
disagreement
implication
16. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
law of excluded middle
exclusives
ad populum
17. A hasty generalization
converse of a statement
ad populum
apriorism
non sequitur
18. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
circular reasoning
non sequitur
tautology
ad populum
19. The premise containing the major term
ipse dixit
converse of a statement
major premise
mixed hypothetical syllogism
20. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
enthymeme
fallacy of accent
conclusion
major premise
21. Difference of opinion or perception
mood
apparent disagreement
logical equivalence
major term
22. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
ad ignorantiam
fallacy of distraction
bulverism
23. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
logical equivalence
supported statements
ipse dixit
24. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
amphiboly
implication
fallacy of accent
ad baculum
25. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
disagreement
intension
tu quoque
ad hominem
26. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
law of excluded middle
extension
schema
counterexample
27. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
exclusives
formal logic
subimplication
contrary
28. An illegimate appeal to authority
statement
ipse dixit
immediate reference
post hoc ergo propter hoc
29. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
real disagreement
disagreement
equivocation
immediate reference
30. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
figure
contrary
consistant
quantity
31. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
figure
self-contradiction
law of Non-Contradiction
major term
32. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
extension
distributed term
term
tu quoque
33. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
antecedent
counterexample
ipse dixit
valid
34. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
middle term
equivocation
pure hypothetical syllogism
law of identity
35. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
self-contradiction
independance
mixed hypothetical syllogism
extension
36. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
bulverism
composition
ad baculum
contrapositive of a statement
37. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
informal fallacy
figure
inclusive
law of identity
38. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacy of accent
ad ignorantiam
genus
quantity
39. Contains the minor term
equivocation
middle term
minor premise
ambiguous
40. An argument based merely on the passage of time
converse of a statement
ad ignorantiam
chronological snobbery
law of Non-Contradiction
41. The condition - the part following the 'if'
schema
mixed hypothetical syllogism
antecedent
consequent
42. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
implication
enthymeme
apparent disagreement
formal logic
43. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
induction
ipse dixit
genus
logic
44. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
non sequitur
logic
inclusive
sound syllogism
45. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
self-contradiction
fallacy of distraction
informal fallacy
fallacy of accent
46. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
bulverism
valid
supported statements
middle term
47. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
informal fallacy
statement
contrapositive of a statement
hypothetical
48. The set of all terms not included in the given term
self-supporting statements
ad baculum
enthymeme
complement of a term
49. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
informal fallacy
quantity
ad hominem
complex question
50. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
non sequitur
consequent
square of oppisition
division