SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
fallacy of accent
ad hominem
consequent
immediate reference
2. A concept that can be expressed precisely
minor term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
term
division
3. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
division
hypothetical
converse of a statement
real disagreement
4. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
consistant
post hoc ergo propter hoc
extension
intension
5. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
mood
enthymeme
ambiguous
disagreement
6. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
apparent disagreement
hypothetical
circular reasoning
categorical syllogism
7. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
ad baculum
pure hypothetical syllogism
chronological snobbery
major premise
8. The premise containing the major term
complement of a term
circular reasoning
major premise
term
9. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
law of excluded middle
complex question
immediate reference
informal fallacy
10. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
independance
middle term
logical equivalence
division
11. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
hypothetical
subject
fallacy of accent
induction
12. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
counterexample
ad ignorantiam
informal fallacy
ad hominem
13. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
disagreement
informal fallacy
fallacy of distraction
contradiction
14. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
ipse dixit
bulverism
middle term
tu quoque
15. The science and art of reasoning well
self-contradiction
logic
converse of a statement
ipse dixit
16. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
argument`
ambiguous
valid
17. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
apriorism
mixed hypothetical syllogism
superimplication
verbal disagreement
18. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
hypothetical
ad hominem
law of excluded middle
argument`
19. The condition - the part following the 'if'
antecedent
middle term
independance
law of Non-Contradiction
20. Found once in each premise
circular reasoning
consequent
apriorism
middle term
21. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
non sequitur
subject
major term
conclusion
22. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
subject
genus
conclusion
subimplication
23. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
subject
middle term
counterexample
chronological snobbery
24. An argument from lack of evidence
law of excluded middle
statement
ad ignorantiam
major term
25. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
supported statements
implication
hypothetical
self-contradiction
26. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
categorical syllogism
major term
consistant
self-supporting statements
27. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
non sequitur
informal fallacy
major term
amphiboly
28. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
law of excluded middle
schema
supported statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
29. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
formal logic
major premise
schema
implication
30. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
categorical syllogism
real disagreement
quantity
tu quoque
31. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
consistant
division
bulverism
32. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
quantity
intension
major term
schema
33. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
extension
law of Non-Contradiction
ad baculum
34. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
genus
square of oppisition
logic
extension
35. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
square of oppisition
statement
fallacy of distraction
36. The set of all terms not included in the given term
ad populum
implication
law of excluded middle
complement of a term
37. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
implication
fallacy of distraction
contradiction
term
38. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
informal fallacy
ambiguous
middle term
figure
39. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
intension
formal logic
law of identity
ad baculum
40. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
fallacy of distraction
ambiguous
tautology
superimplication
41. Difference of opinion or perception
non sequitur
consequent
apparent disagreement
chronological snobbery
42. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
intension
square of oppisition
circular reasoning
self-contradiction
43. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of form
genus
subcontrariety
amphiboly
44. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
contradiction
bulverism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
apparent disagreement
45. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
equivocation
chronological snobbery
antecedent
conclusion
46. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
informal fallacy
law of identity
contrary
self-contradiction
47. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
quantity
complement of a term
distributed term
law of Non-Contradiction
48. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
verbal disagreement
self-contradiction
complement of a term
pure hypothetical syllogism
49. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
formal logic
mood
quantity
50. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
ad baculum
law of excluded middle
logical equivalence