SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The set of all terms not included in the given term
minor premise
complement of a term
major premise
non sequitur
2. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
quantity
valid
obverse of a statement
self-contradiction
3. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
induction
distributed term
apparent disagreement
major term
4. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
chronological snobbery
distributed term
independance
5. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
division
subimplication
disagreement
contrapositive of a statement
6. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad hominem
apriorism
equivocation
extension
7. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
ad baculum
categorical syllogism
amphiboly
enthymeme
8. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
self-contradiction
division
logical equivalence
conclusion
9. Is valid and has true premises
subcontrariety
induction
complement of a term
sound syllogism
10. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
informal fallacy
law of Non-Contradiction
ad ignorantiam
subimplication
11. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
supported statements
immediate reference
enthymeme
major term
12. An illegitimate appeal to force
hypothetical
ad baculum
minor premise
ambiguous
13. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
counterexample
informal fallacy
self-supporting statements
ad hominem
14. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
distributed term
obverse of a statement
sound syllogism
minor premise
15. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
tautology
schema
exclusives
fallacies of form
16. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
middle term
consistant
contrary
argument`
17. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
fallacies of ambiguity
division
figure
distributed term
18. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
consistant
middle term
ad ignorantiam
contradiction
19. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
major premise
hypothetical
argument`
formal logic
20. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
contrary
figure
composition
tu quoque
21. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
contrary
independance
fallacy of accent
conclusion
22. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
fallacy of distraction
complement of a term
ad populum
obverse of a statement
23. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
contrary
chronological snobbery
amphiboly
obverse of a statement
24. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
square of oppisition
term
composition
subcontrariety
25. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
fallacy of accent
chronological snobbery
non sequitur
converse of a statement
26. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
hypothetical
real disagreement
genus
disagreement
27. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
logic
enthymeme
major term
implication
28. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
ipse dixit
term
disagreement
subcontrariety
29. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
independance
minor term
equivocation
circular reasoning
30. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
schema
informal fallacy
ambiguous
complex question
31. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
ad baculum
hypothetical
ipse dixit
mixed hypothetical syllogism
32. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
ad baculum
equivocation
argument`
chronological snobbery
33. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
extension
antecedent
contrary
formal logic
34. Any statement is either true or false
square of oppisition
complex question
law of excluded middle
real disagreement
35. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
ipse dixit
conclusion
immediate reference
supported statements
36. A hasty generalization
apriorism
extension
tu quoque
argument`
37. A statement cannot be both true and false
tu quoque
valid
law of Non-Contradiction
quantity
38. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
major term
ipse dixit
disagreement
39. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
logic
exclusives
inclusive
genus
40. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
non sequitur
chronological snobbery
valid
consequent
41. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
quantity
exclusives
induction
subject
42. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
supported statements
major premise
pure hypothetical syllogism
43. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
logic
fallacy of distraction
converse of a statement
verbal disagreement
44. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
exclusives
pure hypothetical syllogism
intension
real disagreement
45. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
ad baculum
middle term
fallacy of distraction
fallacies of ambiguity
46. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
informal fallacy
counterexample
tu quoque
schema
47. An argument from lack of evidence
fallacies of form
fallacy of accent
ad ignorantiam
contrary
48. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
distributed term
schema
subject
fallacy of accent
49. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
apparent disagreement
complex question
conclusion
enthymeme
50. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
fallacy of distraction
figure
mood
hypothetical