SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
informal fallacy
either/or
immediate reference
tu quoque
2. An argument based merely on the passage of time
apparent disagreement
law of Non-Contradiction
chronological snobbery
fallacy of accent
3. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
tautology
ad ignorantiam
independance
ad baculum
4. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
disagreement
induction
complex question
obverse of a statement
5. An illegimate appeal to authority
hypothetical
ipse dixit
minor term
quantity
6. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
subimplication
law of Non-Contradiction
mood
fallacy of distraction
7. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
composition
contrary
self-contradiction
complement of a term
8. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
schema
contrapositive of a statement
valid
non sequitur
9. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
informal fallacy
tu quoque
amphiboly
major term
10. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
apriorism
hypothetical
ad populum
complex question
11. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
self-supporting statements
self-contradiction
contrapositive of a statement
12. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
statement
schema
fallacy of accent
pure hypothetical syllogism
13. A sentence which is either true or false
pure hypothetical syllogism
informal fallacy
law of excluded middle
statement
14. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
division
consistant
law of Non-Contradiction
self-contradiction
15. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
verbal disagreement
logical equivalence
ambiguous
16. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
statement
verbal disagreement
immediate reference
argument`
17. An argument from lack of evidence
conclusion
minor premise
ad ignorantiam
post hoc ergo propter hoc
18. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
amphiboly
apriorism
intension
division
19. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
categorical syllogism
major term
ad populum
complement of a term
20. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
pure hypothetical syllogism
minor term
chronological snobbery
figure
21. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of identity
statement
minor term
non sequitur
22. A statement cannot be both true and false
consistant
law of Non-Contradiction
minor term
subcontrariety
23. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
amphiboly
fallacy of distraction
apparent disagreement
obverse of a statement
24. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
ipse dixit
square of oppisition
implication
ambiguous
25. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
conclusion
quantity
ad ignorantiam
informal fallacy
26. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
extension
term
tu quoque
law of Non-Contradiction
27. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
consequent
bulverism
sound syllogism
pure hypothetical syllogism
28. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
fallacy of accent
major premise
contrapositive of a statement
29. Any statement is either true or false
subimplication
law of excluded middle
valid
consistant
30. An illegitimate appeal to force
ad baculum
complex question
apparent disagreement
term
31. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
subcontrariety
extension
logic
hypothetical
32. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
circular reasoning
self-contradiction
fallacy of accent
middle term
33. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
implication
ambiguous
informal fallacy
mood
34. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
amphiboly
subject
tu quoque
fallacies of form
35. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
circular reasoning
contrary
superimplication
law of Non-Contradiction
36. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
apriorism
quantity
categorical syllogism
logical equivalence
37. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
fallacy of accent
self-contradiction
converse of a statement
extension
38. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
inclusive
real disagreement
argument`
contrary
39. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
either/or
apparent disagreement
chronological snobbery
valid
40. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
complement of a term
verbal disagreement
bulverism
statement
41. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
square of oppisition
bulverism
antecedent
immediate reference
42. A concept that can be expressed precisely
fallacy of accent
law of excluded middle
either/or
term
43. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
subimplication
ad hominem
distributed term
square of oppisition
44. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
equivocation
either/or
genus
ad ignorantiam
45. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
fallacy of accent
composition
square of oppisition
46. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
self-supporting statements
consequent
minor term
subcontrariety
47. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
amphiboly
enthymeme
complex question
contradiction
48. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
converse of a statement
extension
law of Non-Contradiction
counterexample
49. Contains the minor term
minor premise
consequent
extension
inclusive
50. Difference of opinion or perception
major premise
ambiguous
either/or
apparent disagreement