SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
induction
contrary
self-supporting statements
enthymeme
2. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
minor term
extension
logical equivalence
informal fallacy
3. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
valid
intension
term
disagreement
4. An illegimate appeal to authority
ad baculum
ipse dixit
informal fallacy
supported statements
5. A concept that can be expressed precisely
term
formal logic
chronological snobbery
square of oppisition
6. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
mixed hypothetical syllogism
formal logic
non sequitur
7. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
law of identity
schema
subject
contradiction
8. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ambiguous
tautology
ad baculum
9. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
distributed term
contradiction
immediate reference
converse of a statement
10. The science and art of reasoning well
logic
hypothetical
intension
converse of a statement
11. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
circular reasoning
antecedent
converse of a statement
consistant
12. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
inclusive
fallacy of accent
self-contradiction
13. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
pure hypothetical syllogism
categorical syllogism
self-supporting statements
converse of a statement
14. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
square of oppisition
fallacy of accent
self-contradiction
circular reasoning
15. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
subject
valid
exclusives
16. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
superimplication
figure
enthymeme
subcontrariety
17. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
genus
argument`
fallacy of distraction
sound syllogism
18. An illegitimate appeal to force
ad baculum
contrary
induction
self-supporting statements
19. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
subcontrariety
minor premise
amphiboly
ipse dixit
20. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
apriorism
ambiguous
contrapositive of a statement
schema
21. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
law of excluded middle
implication
valid
amphiboly
22. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
extension
apparent disagreement
quantity
valid
23. A hasty generalization
mood
tautology
independance
apriorism
24. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
amphiboly
law of identity
consequent
obverse of a statement
25. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
ad populum
minor premise
law of excluded middle
26. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
contrary
circular reasoning
counterexample
disagreement
27. An argument from lack of evidence
ad ignorantiam
disagreement
minor premise
contradiction
28. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
amphiboly
law of identity
intension
tu quoque
29. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
logical equivalence
enthymeme
composition
figure
30. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
induction
independance
non sequitur
law of Non-Contradiction
31. Found once in each premise
tu quoque
logical equivalence
middle term
contrary
32. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
counterexample
ad hominem
categorical syllogism
contrapositive of a statement
33. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
tu quoque
ambiguous
exclusives
verbal disagreement
34. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
self-supporting statements
conclusion
tautology
apparent disagreement
35. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
fallacy of distraction
self-contradiction
genus
immediate reference
36. If a statement is true - then it is true
apriorism
chronological snobbery
law of identity
composition
37. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
real disagreement
inclusive
counterexample
subimplication
38. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
contrary
fallacies of ambiguity
complex question
real disagreement
39. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
quantity
middle term
ad hominem
contrapositive of a statement
40. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
complex question
self-contradiction
law of excluded middle
counterexample
41. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
independance
apparent disagreement
subimplication
contradiction
42. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
sound syllogism
contradiction
contrapositive of a statement
antecedent
43. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
distributed term
self-supporting statements
equivocation
consistant
44. The set of all terms not included in the given term
self-supporting statements
ad baculum
complement of a term
valid
45. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
figure
minor premise
induction
consistant
46. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
self-contradiction
mixed hypothetical syllogism
major term
fallacies of ambiguity
47. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
tautology
ad ignorantiam
supported statements
valid
48. An argument based merely on the passage of time
complement of a term
figure
chronological snobbery
enthymeme
49. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
quantity
obverse of a statement
formal logic
logical equivalence
50. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
chronological snobbery
post hoc ergo propter hoc
logic
bulverism