SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
major premise
mood
consequent
exclusives
2. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
distributed term
hypothetical
consequent
law of excluded middle
3. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
inclusive
fallacy of accent
ad populum
bulverism
4. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
subimplication
genus
independance
mixed hypothetical syllogism
5. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
verbal disagreement
either/or
circular reasoning
enthymeme
6. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
supported statements
minor term
middle term
logical equivalence
7. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
real disagreement
self-contradiction
valid
bulverism
8. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
enthymeme
valid
division
tu quoque
9. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
apriorism
equivocation
verbal disagreement
intension
10. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
equivocation
bulverism
consistant
11. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
major premise
argument`
contrapositive of a statement
law of Non-Contradiction
12. Difference of opinion or perception
bulverism
mood
apparent disagreement
argument`
13. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
subimplication
contrapositive of a statement
circular reasoning
supported statements
14. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
composition
argument`
complex question
apriorism
15. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
middle term
mood
amphiboly
16. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
statement
categorical syllogism
composition
law of identity
17. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
bulverism
immediate reference
ad baculum
independance
18. An argument based merely on the passage of time
consequent
tautology
chronological snobbery
disagreement
19. A statement cannot be both true and false
law of Non-Contradiction
consistant
middle term
distributed term
20. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
contrary
supported statements
subject
inclusive
21. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
contrary
self-supporting statements
ambiguous
bulverism
22. The condition - the part following the 'if'
tu quoque
pure hypothetical syllogism
hypothetical
antecedent
23. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
informal fallacy
inclusive
contradiction
minor premise
24. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
ad ignorantiam
square of oppisition
fallacies of ambiguity
amphiboly
25. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
informal fallacy
amphiboly
exclusives
genus
26. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
fallacies of ambiguity
composition
subcontrariety
27. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
logical equivalence
middle term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ipse dixit
28. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
contrary
major term
intension
minor premise
29. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
logical equivalence
immediate reference
sound syllogism
middle term
30. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
disagreement
chronological snobbery
pure hypothetical syllogism
self-supporting statements
31. An illegimate appeal to authority
non sequitur
ipse dixit
mixed hypothetical syllogism
inclusive
32. The science and art of reasoning well
self-supporting statements
post hoc ergo propter hoc
real disagreement
logic
33. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
schema
ad hominem
implication
division
34. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
verbal disagreement
major premise
immediate reference
35. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
enthymeme
fallacies of ambiguity
conclusion
term
36. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
enthymeme
pure hypothetical syllogism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
37. Found once in each premise
statement
middle term
contrary
chronological snobbery
38. Is valid and has true premises
statement
contrary
self-contradiction
sound syllogism
39. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
schema
division
induction
distributed term
40. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
term
categorical syllogism
independance
subject
41. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
supported statements
major term
real disagreement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
42. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
complement of a term
schema
fallacy of accent
formal logic
43. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
circular reasoning
major premise
extension
argument`
44. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
obverse of a statement
term
apriorism
circular reasoning
45. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
equivocation
major term
consequent
46. An argument from lack of evidence
hypothetical
minor term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ad ignorantiam
47. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
amphiboly
conclusion
genus
intension
48. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
conclusion
apparent disagreement
converse of a statement
statement
49. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
immediate reference
square of oppisition
fallacies of ambiguity
disagreement
50. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
contrary
statement
argument`
tu quoque