SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
apparent disagreement
bulverism
term
superimplication
2. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
distributed term
fallacy of accent
argument`
consistant
3. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
genus
subject
pure hypothetical syllogism
superimplication
4. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
major term
implication
mood
contrapositive of a statement
5. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
real disagreement
division
pure hypothetical syllogism
schema
6. Contains the minor term
consequent
ad baculum
minor premise
enthymeme
7. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
subcontrariety
fallacies of form
equivocation
square of oppisition
8. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
major premise
converse of a statement
extension
mood
9. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
sound syllogism
self-supporting statements
law of excluded middle
valid
10. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
valid
hypothetical
superimplication
contrapositive of a statement
11. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
apparent disagreement
logic
converse of a statement
mood
12. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
subject
informal fallacy
consequent
ad baculum
13. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
figure
law of identity
consequent
tautology
14. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
figure
self-contradiction
term
formal logic
15. A statement cannot be both true and false
consequent
law of Non-Contradiction
informal fallacy
schema
16. An argument from lack of evidence
ad ignorantiam
consistant
genus
complement of a term
17. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
non sequitur
complement of a term
equivocation
antecedent
18. The set of all terms not included in the given term
ad hominem
complement of a term
bulverism
superimplication
19. The condition - the part following the 'if'
genus
antecedent
square of oppisition
self-contradiction
20. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
schema
contrary
real disagreement
apparent disagreement
21. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
ad ignorantiam
implication
contradiction
tu quoque
22. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
converse of a statement
figure
self-supporting statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
23. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
ipse dixit
quantity
genus
categorical syllogism
24. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
ipse dixit
obverse of a statement
intension
implication
25. An argument based merely on the passage of time
chronological snobbery
informal fallacy
consequent
middle term
26. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
induction
intension
fallacy of accent
fallacies of ambiguity
27. A hasty generalization
obverse of a statement
intension
apriorism
enthymeme
28. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
inclusive
conclusion
disagreement
minor term
29. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
logical equivalence
contrapositive of a statement
circular reasoning
ad hominem
30. The science and art of reasoning well
law of identity
logic
minor premise
valid
31. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
supported statements
consistant
inclusive
quantity
32. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
fallacy of distraction
converse of a statement
superimplication
intension
33. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
ad ignorantiam
converse of a statement
subimplication
34. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
ad populum
inclusive
tu quoque
subimplication
35. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
counterexample
mixed hypothetical syllogism
mood
self-supporting statements
36. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
independance
either/or
categorical syllogism
middle term
37. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
square of oppisition
argument`
law of identity
subimplication
38. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
hypothetical
logic
tu quoque
argument`
39. Is valid and has true premises
enthymeme
induction
argument`
sound syllogism
40. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
apriorism
non sequitur
consistant
statement
41. Difference of opinion or perception
argument`
apparent disagreement
supported statements
counterexample
42. Found once in each premise
fallacy of distraction
conclusion
middle term
consistant
43. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
figure
mixed hypothetical syllogism
argument`
disagreement
44. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
enthymeme
mixed hypothetical syllogism
tautology
contradiction
45. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
superimplication
square of oppisition
composition
46. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
post hoc ergo propter hoc
term
law of excluded middle
ad hominem
47. If a statement is true - then it is true
pure hypothetical syllogism
extension
conclusion
law of identity
48. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
inclusive
hypothetical
fallacy of accent
ad hominem
49. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
subject
self-supporting statements
tu quoque
self-contradiction
50. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
conclusion
composition
supported statements
hypothetical