SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
term
self-contradiction
ambiguous
tautology
2. A sentence which is either true or false
argument`
contrapositive of a statement
statement
categorical syllogism
3. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
minor premise
induction
immediate reference
independance
4. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
contradiction
consistant
non sequitur
distributed term
5. An illegimate appeal to authority
post hoc ergo propter hoc
apparent disagreement
quantity
ipse dixit
6. An illegitimate appeal to force
ad baculum
self-contradiction
ipse dixit
middle term
7. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
complement of a term
tautology
formal logic
8. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
superimplication
subimplication
complex question
figure
9. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
subcontrariety
formal logic
post hoc ergo propter hoc
subject
10. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
subcontrariety
fallacies of ambiguity
intension
superimplication
11. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
tu quoque
categorical syllogism
argument`
complex question
12. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
ad ignorantiam
induction
fallacies of form
division
13. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
formal logic
immediate reference
composition
14. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
mood
induction
term
15. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
conclusion
immediate reference
supported statements
formal logic
16. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
division
mood
converse of a statement
contrapositive of a statement
17. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
obverse of a statement
major term
quantity
counterexample
18. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
disagreement
middle term
ad ignorantiam
19. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
major term
subcontrariety
self-contradiction
disagreement
20. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
equivocation
apriorism
immediate reference
21. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
categorical syllogism
ad populum
valid
ad ignorantiam
22. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
law of identity
independance
self-supporting statements
division
23. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
contradiction
antecedent
law of identity
self-contradiction
24. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
ad baculum
figure
fallacies of form
implication
25. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
hypothetical
independance
subimplication
inclusive
26. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
induction
valid
non sequitur
quantity
27. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
distributed term
antecedent
tautology
contradiction
28. An argument based merely on the passage of time
chronological snobbery
consequent
equivocation
ad ignorantiam
29. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
conclusion
extension
ad baculum
ad ignorantiam
30. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
superimplication
pure hypothetical syllogism
implication
fallacies of form
31. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
supported statements
hypothetical
amphiboly
inclusive
32. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
minor premise
ad ignorantiam
genus
middle term
33. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
middle term
independance
minor term
extension
34. Difference of opinion or perception
complex question
ad ignorantiam
division
apparent disagreement
35. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
obverse of a statement
division
enthymeme
superimplication
36. Is valid and has true premises
tautology
formal logic
major term
sound syllogism
37. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
post hoc ergo propter hoc
square of oppisition
consistant
categorical syllogism
38. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
amphiboly
complex question
square of oppisition
minor term
39. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
ipse dixit
complement of a term
schema
equivocation
40. The premise containing the major term
complement of a term
major premise
term
obverse of a statement
41. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
apparent disagreement
major premise
pure hypothetical syllogism
square of oppisition
42. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
complex question
ambiguous
implication
self-supporting statements
43. Any statement is either true or false
hypothetical
pure hypothetical syllogism
self-supporting statements
law of excluded middle
44. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
counterexample
tautology
formal logic
consequent
45. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
bulverism
mood
ad hominem
contrary
46. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacy of accent
inclusive
antecedent
consistant
47. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
circular reasoning
either/or
bulverism
tautology
48. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
mood
categorical syllogism
obverse of a statement
minor premise
49. Found once in each premise
logical equivalence
middle term
subcontrariety
non sequitur
50. The science and art of reasoning well
amphiboly
inclusive
informal fallacy
logic