SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
non sequitur
tautology
disagreement
verbal disagreement
2. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
quantity
non sequitur
chronological snobbery
verbal disagreement
3. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
categorical syllogism
either/or
real disagreement
hypothetical
4. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
distributed term
intension
contrapositive of a statement
complement of a term
5. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
induction
genus
schema
consequent
6. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
immediate reference
contrapositive of a statement
apriorism
valid
7. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
fallacy of accent
superimplication
formal logic
self-contradiction
8. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
major term
bulverism
conclusion
ipse dixit
9. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
equivocation
superimplication
counterexample
post hoc ergo propter hoc
10. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
immediate reference
independance
ipse dixit
self-contradiction
11. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
consistant
verbal disagreement
intension
obverse of a statement
12. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacies of ambiguity
tu quoque
inclusive
ad hominem
13. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
amphiboly
contradiction
sound syllogism
pure hypothetical syllogism
14. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
contrary
subimplication
composition
supported statements
15. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
intension
subject
conclusion
argument`
16. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
mood
consequent
inclusive
distributed term
17. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
counterexample
inclusive
schema
fallacy of distraction
18. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
argument`
informal fallacy
chronological snobbery
ad populum
19. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
genus
intension
induction
20. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
fallacy of distraction
independance
either/or
figure
21. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
valid
argument`
subimplication
real disagreement
22. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
circular reasoning
immediate reference
disagreement
mood
23. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
conclusion
pure hypothetical syllogism
major premise
either/or
24. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
minor term
exclusives
equivocation
pure hypothetical syllogism
25. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
post hoc ergo propter hoc
supported statements
figure
fallacy of accent
26. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
inclusive
mixed hypothetical syllogism
formal logic
circular reasoning
27. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
self-supporting statements
minor term
consequent
post hoc ergo propter hoc
28. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
fallacy of accent
obverse of a statement
verbal disagreement
enthymeme
29. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
division
subimplication
ambiguous
genus
30. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
fallacy of distraction
contrapositive of a statement
genus
31. The science and art of reasoning well
superimplication
logic
figure
fallacies of form
32. Any statement is either true or false
circular reasoning
non sequitur
law of excluded middle
equivocation
33. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
implication
division
minor term
ipse dixit
34. An argument based merely on the passage of time
quantity
ad ignorantiam
chronological snobbery
disagreement
35. The condition - the part following the 'if'
non sequitur
antecedent
independance
contradiction
36. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
square of oppisition
logic
complement of a term
37. An illegimate appeal to authority
self-supporting statements
verbal disagreement
ipse dixit
contrapositive of a statement
38. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
law of identity
mood
apparent disagreement
tu quoque
39. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
contrary
categorical syllogism
circular reasoning
logical equivalence
40. An illegitimate appeal to force
ad baculum
minor term
counterexample
minor premise
41. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
mood
extension
quantity
enthymeme
42. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
logical equivalence
circular reasoning
fallacy of distraction
middle term
43. A concept that can be expressed precisely
formal logic
term
converse of a statement
argument`
44. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
contrary
contrapositive of a statement
informal fallacy
extension
45. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
enthymeme
induction
square of oppisition
immediate reference
46. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
ad baculum
ad ignorantiam
fallacies of form
post hoc ergo propter hoc
47. A hasty generalization
informal fallacy
subimplication
apriorism
contrary
48. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
tautology
induction
ad populum
minor term
49. Is valid and has true premises
pure hypothetical syllogism
sound syllogism
ad ignorantiam
hypothetical
50. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
law of Non-Contradiction
division
equivocation
either/or