SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
disagreement
minor term
subimplication
circular reasoning
2. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
argument`
minor term
square of oppisition
induction
3. Any statement is either true or false
enthymeme
law of excluded middle
division
law of Non-Contradiction
4. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
bulverism
antecedent
self-supporting statements
tautology
5. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
supported statements
categorical syllogism
counterexample
statement
6. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
formal logic
major premise
verbal disagreement
equivocation
7. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
square of oppisition
converse of a statement
fallacies of ambiguity
equivocation
8. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
antecedent
figure
apriorism
9. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
tu quoque
fallacy of accent
induction
independance
10. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
amphiboly
antecedent
valid
argument`
11. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
real disagreement
major term
immediate reference
fallacy of accent
12. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
mixed hypothetical syllogism
superimplication
independance
inclusive
13. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
self-contradiction
complex question
subcontrariety
fallacy of distraction
14. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacies of ambiguity
major term
categorical syllogism
mixed hypothetical syllogism
15. Found once in each premise
minor premise
middle term
inclusive
fallacy of distraction
16. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
ad ignorantiam
enthymeme
supported statements
complement of a term
17. A concept that can be expressed precisely
extension
term
logical equivalence
major term
18. An illegimate appeal to authority
circular reasoning
ipse dixit
ad hominem
schema
19. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
disagreement
logic
supported statements
20. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
mood
consequent
immediate reference
contrary
21. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
complex question
intension
pure hypothetical syllogism
mixed hypothetical syllogism
22. Is valid and has true premises
schema
complement of a term
figure
sound syllogism
23. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
major term
ambiguous
fallacy of accent
logic
24. Contains the minor term
statement
minor premise
fallacy of accent
major term
25. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
self-supporting statements
bulverism
extension
inclusive
26. The set of all terms not included in the given term
implication
complement of a term
contrary
composition
27. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
fallacies of ambiguity
amphiboly
self-supporting statements
complement of a term
28. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
post hoc ergo propter hoc
counterexample
contradiction
hypothetical
29. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
ambiguous
bulverism
schema
converse of a statement
30. A sentence which is either true or false
tautology
statement
fallacy of accent
subimplication
31. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
amphiboly
composition
contrary
minor premise
32. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
distributed term
real disagreement
ipse dixit
ambiguous
33. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
implication
apriorism
term
formal logic
34. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
intension
immediate reference
pure hypothetical syllogism
obverse of a statement
35. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
real disagreement
figure
categorical syllogism
36. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
ad populum
self-supporting statements
fallacies of form
circular reasoning
37. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ambiguous
fallacy of distraction
subject
38. A statement cannot be both true and false
law of Non-Contradiction
ad baculum
genus
fallacies of ambiguity
39. An illegitimate appeal to force
complement of a term
ad baculum
mood
inclusive
40. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
obverse of a statement
informal fallacy
contrary
independance
41. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
ambiguous
complex question
real disagreement
logical equivalence
42. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
pure hypothetical syllogism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
figure
formal logic
43. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
fallacies of ambiguity
contrapositive of a statement
intension
categorical syllogism
44. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
pure hypothetical syllogism
statement
converse of a statement
apparent disagreement
45. A hasty generalization
counterexample
major premise
disagreement
apriorism
46. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
subimplication
square of oppisition
valid
subject
47. An argument based merely on the passage of time
fallacy of accent
chronological snobbery
genus
mood
48. The condition - the part following the 'if'
conclusion
ad hominem
antecedent
disagreement
49. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
contrapositive of a statement
statement
informal fallacy
fallacy of distraction
50. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
self-contradiction
superimplication
verbal disagreement
complex question