SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
formal logic
induction
converse of a statement
fallacy of distraction
2. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
law of identity
intension
subimplication
tu quoque
3. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
mood
amphiboly
contradiction
tautology
4. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
consequent
consistant
contrapositive of a statement
converse of a statement
5. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
middle term
counterexample
disagreement
logic
6. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
law of identity
subimplication
intension
disagreement
7. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
amphiboly
independance
fallacies of ambiguity
fallacy of distraction
8. If a statement is true - then it is true
subimplication
mixed hypothetical syllogism
law of identity
intension
9. A statement cannot be both true and false
ipse dixit
logical equivalence
law of Non-Contradiction
subcontrariety
10. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
antecedent
disagreement
conclusion
consistant
11. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
independance
valid
subimplication
induction
12. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
mood
hypothetical
contrary
equivocation
13. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
circular reasoning
tu quoque
law of Non-Contradiction
disagreement
14. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
logic
formal logic
schema
15. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
genus
law of Non-Contradiction
middle term
fallacies of ambiguity
16. A concept that can be expressed precisely
independance
square of oppisition
term
ad populum
17. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
implication
induction
ad populum
consequent
18. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
ad populum
fallacy of distraction
informal fallacy
amphiboly
19. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
circular reasoning
extension
law of Non-Contradiction
mood
20. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
mixed hypothetical syllogism
major premise
independance
division
21. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
formal logic
term
minor premise
bulverism
22. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
inclusive
intension
antecedent
superimplication
23. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
equivocation
figure
tu quoque
law of excluded middle
24. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
antecedent
middle term
verbal disagreement
obverse of a statement
25. An argument based merely on the passage of time
self-contradiction
square of oppisition
chronological snobbery
subimplication
26. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
contradiction
fallacies of ambiguity
statement
27. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
fallacies of form
exclusives
statement
apparent disagreement
28. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
exclusives
genus
apparent disagreement
categorical syllogism
29. The condition - the part following the 'if'
inclusive
antecedent
genus
logic
30. A hasty generalization
apriorism
verbal disagreement
intension
superimplication
31. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
argument`
ipse dixit
real disagreement
distributed term
32. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
sound syllogism
fallacy of accent
immediate reference
ad baculum
33. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
immediate reference
division
composition
tautology
34. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
subject
exclusives
post hoc ergo propter hoc
inclusive
35. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
division
disagreement
converse of a statement
circular reasoning
36. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
obverse of a statement
statement
hypothetical
law of Non-Contradiction
37. An argument from lack of evidence
chronological snobbery
ad ignorantiam
minor term
induction
38. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
genus
fallacies of form
hypothetical
major term
39. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
obverse of a statement
disagreement
antecedent
quantity
40. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
independance
fallacies of form
genus
implication
41. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of form
non sequitur
antecedent
term
42. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
pure hypothetical syllogism
subcontrariety
contradiction
chronological snobbery
43. The premise containing the major term
major premise
subcontrariety
subject
mood
44. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
pure hypothetical syllogism
bulverism
fallacies of ambiguity
ad baculum
45. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
tautology
verbal disagreement
pure hypothetical syllogism
subimplication
46. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
non sequitur
categorical syllogism
minor term
implication
47. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
converse of a statement
real disagreement
superimplication
conclusion
48. The set of all terms not included in the given term
real disagreement
complement of a term
subimplication
categorical syllogism
49. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
hypothetical
argument`
schema
50. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
counterexample
ambiguous
square of oppisition
fallacy of distraction