SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Any statement is either true or false
statement
disagreement
law of excluded middle
ad ignorantiam
2. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
fallacy of accent
bulverism
minor term
fallacies of ambiguity
3. Is valid and has true premises
verbal disagreement
pure hypothetical syllogism
sound syllogism
term
4. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
contrapositive of a statement
counterexample
ipse dixit
implication
5. A concept that can be expressed precisely
post hoc ergo propter hoc
antecedent
enthymeme
term
6. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
subcontrariety
hypothetical
superimplication
post hoc ergo propter hoc
7. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
antecedent
distributed term
enthymeme
square of oppisition
8. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
subject
logic
fallacies of ambiguity
subimplication
9. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
logical equivalence
argument`
subject
ad ignorantiam
10. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
mixed hypothetical syllogism
law of Non-Contradiction
law of identity
11. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
law of identity
converse of a statement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
inclusive
12. An argument from lack of evidence
conclusion
bulverism
ad ignorantiam
complex question
13. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
division
logic
disagreement
induction
14. The science and art of reasoning well
fallacies of form
real disagreement
ambiguous
logic
15. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
genus
distributed term
implication
fallacy of distraction
16. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
hypothetical
independance
contradiction
genus
17. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
converse of a statement
induction
categorical syllogism
formal logic
18. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
square of oppisition
major term
formal logic
figure
19. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
law of Non-Contradiction
equivocation
ambiguous
real disagreement
20. Found once in each premise
subimplication
implication
middle term
inclusive
21. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
fallacies of form
categorical syllogism
quantity
sound syllogism
22. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
contradiction
division
consequent
obverse of a statement
23. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
minor premise
valid
argument`
enthymeme
24. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
minor premise
non sequitur
composition
fallacies of ambiguity
25. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
distributed term
square of oppisition
non sequitur
hypothetical
26. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
complex question
mixed hypothetical syllogism
intension
ad hominem
27. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
figure
minor term
argument`
fallacies of ambiguity
28. A hasty generalization
inclusive
genus
apriorism
implication
29. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
distributed term
schema
major term
mood
30. If a statement is true - then it is true
independance
induction
consequent
law of identity
31. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
apriorism
contrapositive of a statement
mood
ambiguous
32. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
tautology
distributed term
complex question
subimplication
33. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
amphiboly
either/or
inclusive
immediate reference
34. The condition - the part following the 'if'
supported statements
ad populum
antecedent
argument`
35. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
non sequitur
tu quoque
superimplication
verbal disagreement
36. An illegitimate appeal to force
ipse dixit
contradiction
ad baculum
antecedent
37. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
superimplication
ad populum
antecedent
bulverism
38. The set of all terms not included in the given term
antecedent
fallacy of accent
post hoc ergo propter hoc
complement of a term
39. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
apriorism
enthymeme
ipse dixit
genus
40. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
fallacy of distraction
extension
ad populum
exclusives
41. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
law of identity
disagreement
immediate reference
42. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
square of oppisition
amphiboly
verbal disagreement
ad baculum
43. An argument based merely on the passage of time
contradiction
chronological snobbery
schema
law of identity
44. Contains the minor term
law of identity
genus
minor premise
independance
45. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
law of excluded middle
minor premise
implication
self-contradiction
46. Difference of opinion or perception
post hoc ergo propter hoc
subimplication
argument`
apparent disagreement
47. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
inclusive
obverse of a statement
mood
subject
48. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
superimplication
converse of a statement
formal logic
complex question
49. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
intension
schema
induction
logical equivalence
50. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
ad hominem
non sequitur
term
mood