SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
subimplication
subject
self-supporting statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
2. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
statement
real disagreement
either/or
fallacy of accent
3. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
square of oppisition
self-supporting statements
logic
pure hypothetical syllogism
4. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
bulverism
statement
supported statements
5. A concept that can be expressed precisely
informal fallacy
non sequitur
mixed hypothetical syllogism
term
6. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
disagreement
independance
contradiction
formal logic
7. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
tautology
self-supporting statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
exclusives
8. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
chronological snobbery
subcontrariety
implication
pure hypothetical syllogism
9. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
logic
sound syllogism
ambiguous
10. A hasty generalization
ad ignorantiam
apriorism
extension
consequent
11. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
ad populum
induction
sound syllogism
division
12. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
fallacy of distraction
bulverism
fallacy of accent
ipse dixit
13. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
pure hypothetical syllogism
counterexample
implication
mixed hypothetical syllogism
14. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
pure hypothetical syllogism
fallacies of ambiguity
major term
consequent
15. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
major term
conclusion
contrary
16. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
minor premise
law of identity
bulverism
tautology
17. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
obverse of a statement
self-contradiction
contrary
pure hypothetical syllogism
18. The premise containing the major term
fallacy of distraction
complement of a term
ad baculum
major premise
19. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
amphiboly
apparent disagreement
implication
induction
20. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
subimplication
either/or
verbal disagreement
21. The condition - the part following the 'if'
tu quoque
antecedent
mixed hypothetical syllogism
fallacy of distraction
22. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
verbal disagreement
genus
minor premise
subimplication
23. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
ad hominem
contradiction
formal logic
middle term
24. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
composition
verbal disagreement
obverse of a statement
ambiguous
25. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
circular reasoning
either/or
subimplication
quantity
26. Is valid and has true premises
genus
sound syllogism
circular reasoning
chronological snobbery
27. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
bulverism
enthymeme
consistant
subimplication
28. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
amphiboly
verbal disagreement
non sequitur
informal fallacy
29. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
chronological snobbery
intension
composition
independance
30. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
square of oppisition
self-contradiction
chronological snobbery
fallacy of accent
31. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
fallacies of ambiguity
tu quoque
contrary
circular reasoning
32. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
mood
post hoc ergo propter hoc
tu quoque
law of identity
33. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
argument`
major term
real disagreement
figure
34. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
complex question
pure hypothetical syllogism
minor term
intension
35. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
non sequitur
complex question
inclusive
extension
36. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
figure
self-contradiction
argument`
informal fallacy
37. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
categorical syllogism
fallacy of distraction
amphiboly
consequent
38. An illegimate appeal to authority
extension
amphiboly
ipse dixit
non sequitur
39. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
supported statements
intension
contrary
pure hypothetical syllogism
40. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of identity
ad ignorantiam
inclusive
amphiboly
41. A statement cannot be both true and false
law of Non-Contradiction
tu quoque
subject
inclusive
42. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
implication
law of excluded middle
term
law of identity
43. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
antecedent
subimplication
mood
bulverism
44. An illegitimate appeal to force
hypothetical
fallacies of ambiguity
major term
ad baculum
45. The set of all terms not included in the given term
non sequitur
amphiboly
figure
complement of a term
46. An argument based merely on the passage of time
chronological snobbery
counterexample
subcontrariety
middle term
47. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
independance
equivocation
ambiguous
subimplication
48. Contains the minor term
schema
minor premise
exclusives
law of Non-Contradiction
49. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
division
extension
minor term
supported statements
50. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
term
inclusive
hypothetical
verbal disagreement