SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
logical equivalence
quantity
informal fallacy
fallacies of ambiguity
2. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
equivocation
conclusion
ad populum
disagreement
3. Any statement is either true or false
valid
categorical syllogism
law of excluded middle
argument`
4. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
argument`
real disagreement
non sequitur
contradiction
5. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
division
conclusion
apparent disagreement
6. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
apparent disagreement
contrary
major term
independance
7. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
apriorism
law of Non-Contradiction
mixed hypothetical syllogism
valid
8. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
complement of a term
argument`
contrary
circular reasoning
9. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
genus
equivocation
formal logic
disagreement
10. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
tautology
ad hominem
consistant
inclusive
11. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
figure
quantity
either/or
non sequitur
12. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
extension
bulverism
apparent disagreement
major premise
13. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
chronological snobbery
hypothetical
distributed term
logic
14. Contains the minor term
mood
bulverism
square of oppisition
minor premise
15. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
superimplication
subcontrariety
amphiboly
categorical syllogism
16. An illegimate appeal to authority
extension
square of oppisition
ipse dixit
logic
17. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
induction
subimplication
contradiction
division
18. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
exclusives
mood
immediate reference
minor premise
19. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
fallacy of accent
ambiguous
fallacy of distraction
minor term
20. The science and art of reasoning well
mood
law of excluded middle
conclusion
logic
21. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
circular reasoning
contrapositive of a statement
square of oppisition
tu quoque
22. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
disagreement
law of identity
non sequitur
amphiboly
23. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
counterexample
statement
self-contradiction
ad ignorantiam
24. Found once in each premise
contrary
logic
formal logic
middle term
25. An argument from lack of evidence
enthymeme
fallacy of distraction
ad ignorantiam
valid
26. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
valid
antecedent
either/or
categorical syllogism
27. The condition - the part following the 'if'
antecedent
law of identity
ad hominem
quantity
28. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
self-supporting statements
distributed term
independance
fallacy of accent
29. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
valid
complex question
law of identity
intension
30. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
induction
tautology
tu quoque
figure
31. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
apriorism
ad baculum
intension
32. An argument based merely on the passage of time
contrapositive of a statement
apriorism
ipse dixit
chronological snobbery
33. The set of all terms not included in the given term
complement of a term
formal logic
bulverism
valid
34. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
superimplication
tautology
logic
figure
35. A hasty generalization
complex question
apriorism
ad ignorantiam
fallacy of accent
36. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
law of identity
statement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
circular reasoning
37. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
inclusive
subimplication
apriorism
equivocation
38. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
division
obverse of a statement
square of oppisition
sound syllogism
39. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
either/or
equivocation
subject
non sequitur
40. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
composition
enthymeme
superimplication
contrary
41. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
hypothetical
fallacies of form
composition
superimplication
42. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
contrary
equivocation
self-supporting statements
real disagreement
43. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of identity
inclusive
ambiguous
complex question
44. An illegitimate appeal to force
apriorism
tu quoque
distributed term
ad baculum
45. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
figure
exclusives
subcontrariety
logic
46. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
consequent
subcontrariety
complex question
minor term
47. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
obverse of a statement
converse of a statement
middle term
fallacy of accent
48. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
minor term
categorical syllogism
division
logic
49. The premise containing the major term
major premise
fallacies of form
genus
induction
50. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
inclusive
intension
fallacy of distraction
apriorism