SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Found once in each premise
hypothetical
middle term
exclusives
enthymeme
2. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
ad baculum
intension
obverse of a statement
law of excluded middle
3. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
extension
fallacy of distraction
hypothetical
ipse dixit
4. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
major premise
intension
distributed term
enthymeme
5. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
post hoc ergo propter hoc
major premise
categorical syllogism
statement
6. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
converse of a statement
ad baculum
contrary
schema
7. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
logical equivalence
converse of a statement
minor term
valid
8. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
tautology
fallacy of distraction
ad populum
contradiction
9. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
enthymeme
immediate reference
extension
quantity
10. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
informal fallacy
implication
amphiboly
figure
11. An illegimate appeal to authority
ad hominem
ipse dixit
major premise
real disagreement
12. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
amphiboly
apriorism
fallacy of accent
apparent disagreement
13. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
genus
quantity
fallacies of form
14. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
law of identity
hypothetical
equivocation
self-contradiction
15. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
formal logic
contrapositive of a statement
intension
self-contradiction
16. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ambiguous
fallacies of form
self-supporting statements
extension
17. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
consistant
square of oppisition
tu quoque
ad populum
18. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
mood
complex question
immediate reference
exclusives
19. A concept that can be expressed precisely
term
contrary
chronological snobbery
implication
20. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of identity
non sequitur
genus
inclusive
21. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
division
contrapositive of a statement
minor premise
circular reasoning
22. The premise containing the major term
major premise
term
subject
ad baculum
23. A hasty generalization
ipse dixit
enthymeme
fallacy of accent
apriorism
24. Is valid and has true premises
sound syllogism
schema
term
enthymeme
25. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
extension
subject
antecedent
valid
26. The condition - the part following the 'if'
major premise
tu quoque
antecedent
valid
27. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
chronological snobbery
genus
argument`
supported statements
28. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
law of Non-Contradiction
fallacies of form
counterexample
statement
29. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
major term
chronological snobbery
complement of a term
30. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
figure
fallacy of accent
logic
induction
31. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad hominem
valid
converse of a statement
tu quoque
32. A sentence which is either true or false
disagreement
statement
non sequitur
bulverism
33. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
enthymeme
counterexample
tu quoque
superimplication
34. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
contradiction
sound syllogism
exclusives
intension
35. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
self-contradiction
subimplication
superimplication
fallacy of accent
36. An illegitimate appeal to force
real disagreement
contrapositive of a statement
disagreement
ad baculum
37. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
middle term
mood
informal fallacy
law of Non-Contradiction
38. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
major term
immediate reference
valid
apriorism
39. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
contrary
genus
circular reasoning
minor term
40. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
figure
converse of a statement
consistant
square of oppisition
41. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
minor term
division
exclusives
hypothetical
42. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
obverse of a statement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
counterexample
fallacies of ambiguity
43. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
disagreement
intension
extension
bulverism
44. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
enthymeme
complement of a term
counterexample
subimplication
45. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
extension
genus
superimplication
apriorism
46. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
ad populum
implication
square of oppisition
genus
47. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
apriorism
amphiboly
contrapositive of a statement
middle term
48. Any statement is either true or false
ambiguous
intension
law of excluded middle
pure hypothetical syllogism
49. A statement cannot be both true and false
sound syllogism
law of Non-Contradiction
division
induction
50. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
complex question
categorical syllogism
contradiction
converse of a statement