SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
contrary
statement
disagreement
square of oppisition
2. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
intension
counterexample
verbal disagreement
tu quoque
3. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
subimplication
chronological snobbery
term
informal fallacy
4. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
supported statements
contradiction
exclusives
mood
5. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
informal fallacy
converse of a statement
valid
subject
6. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
contradiction
consequent
logic
subject
7. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
ad populum
statement
tu quoque
8. Contains the minor term
quantity
bulverism
equivocation
minor premise
9. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
self-contradiction
equivocation
obverse of a statement
argument`
10. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
subimplication
statement
major term
consistant
11. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
subimplication
minor premise
induction
composition
12. An argument based merely on the passage of time
chronological snobbery
extension
tautology
subimplication
13. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
amphiboly
consistant
fallacy of distraction
bulverism
14. Is valid and has true premises
minor term
non sequitur
sound syllogism
supported statements
15. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
genus
minor premise
complex question
counterexample
16. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
minor premise
formal logic
hypothetical
term
17. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
tautology
supported statements
categorical syllogism
major term
18. If a statement is true - then it is true
complex question
ipse dixit
formal logic
law of identity
19. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
tautology
enthymeme
complement of a term
non sequitur
20. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
formal logic
converse of a statement
induction
law of Non-Contradiction
21. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
ad populum
division
post hoc ergo propter hoc
real disagreement
22. An argument from lack of evidence
non sequitur
ad ignorantiam
law of Non-Contradiction
sound syllogism
23. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
figure
induction
division
circular reasoning
24. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
superimplication
self-supporting statements
contrapositive of a statement
contrary
25. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
extension
schema
contrapositive of a statement
non sequitur
26. A concept that can be expressed precisely
genus
statement
term
middle term
27. A hasty generalization
amphiboly
apriorism
mood
extension
28. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
bulverism
real disagreement
division
29. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
contradiction
minor term
obverse of a statement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
30. Found once in each premise
fallacies of form
middle term
consistant
minor premise
31. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
apparent disagreement
superimplication
complement of a term
32. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
consequent
circular reasoning
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ambiguous
33. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
valid
self-supporting statements
subcontrariety
fallacies of ambiguity
34. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
formal logic
division
categorical syllogism
enthymeme
35. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
mixed hypothetical syllogism
apparent disagreement
contradiction
fallacy of distraction
36. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
conclusion
complex question
division
self-supporting statements
37. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
non sequitur
either/or
square of oppisition
subject
38. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
bulverism
ambiguous
post hoc ergo propter hoc
division
39. The premise containing the major term
major premise
ad baculum
argument`
law of identity
40. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
enthymeme
consequent
ad baculum
inclusive
41. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
categorical syllogism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
supported statements
42. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
independance
self-contradiction
post hoc ergo propter hoc
mixed hypothetical syllogism
43. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
tautology
fallacy of accent
distributed term
pure hypothetical syllogism
44. Difference of opinion or perception
ad hominem
inclusive
apparent disagreement
apriorism
45. An illegimate appeal to authority
contradiction
ipse dixit
argument`
fallacy of accent
46. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
converse of a statement
extension
consistant
equivocation
47. A statement cannot be both true and false
law of Non-Contradiction
consequent
mood
logical equivalence
48. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
figure
immediate reference
apriorism
distributed term
49. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
ad hominem
apparent disagreement
exclusives
implication
50. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
circular reasoning
non sequitur
antecedent
fallacy of accent