SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
valid
distributed term
schema
complement of a term
2. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
apriorism
intension
subcontrariety
implication
3. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
chronological snobbery
quantity
major term
4. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
superimplication
sound syllogism
self-contradiction
fallacy of distraction
5. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
tautology
middle term
immediate reference
conclusion
6. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
self-supporting statements
tu quoque
circular reasoning
mixed hypothetical syllogism
7. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
square of oppisition
disagreement
ad hominem
ad baculum
8. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
either/or
fallacy of accent
induction
subject
9. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
consistant
formal logic
valid
argument`
10. The condition - the part following the 'if'
antecedent
converse of a statement
hypothetical
ad hominem
11. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
exclusives
subcontrariety
inclusive
valid
12. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
schema
obverse of a statement
ad hominem
exclusives
13. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
fallacies of form
antecedent
ambiguous
circular reasoning
14. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
composition
real disagreement
superimplication
induction
15. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
real disagreement
amphiboly
sound syllogism
converse of a statement
16. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
fallacies of form
minor term
distributed term
ipse dixit
17. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
inclusive
induction
minor premise
formal logic
18. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
statement
tu quoque
ad ignorantiam
fallacies of ambiguity
19. The science and art of reasoning well
logic
ambiguous
enthymeme
circular reasoning
20. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
minor premise
subcontrariety
ambiguous
consistant
21. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
ipse dixit
logic
intension
enthymeme
22. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
immediate reference
genus
enthymeme
23. The premise containing the major term
ad populum
categorical syllogism
middle term
major premise
24. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
tu quoque
disagreement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
extension
25. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
self-supporting statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
square of oppisition
fallacies of form
26. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
obverse of a statement
inclusive
subimplication
enthymeme
27. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
contradiction
argument`
consequent
mood
28. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
counterexample
informal fallacy
consequent
major term
29. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
real disagreement
fallacies of form
categorical syllogism
major premise
30. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
disagreement
division
intension
square of oppisition
31. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
bulverism
minor term
middle term
complement of a term
32. An illegitimate appeal to force
antecedent
conclusion
ad baculum
logic
33. A statement cannot be both true and false
non sequitur
law of Non-Contradiction
verbal disagreement
exclusives
34. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
figure
immediate reference
exclusives
35. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
square of oppisition
major premise
non sequitur
36. An argument based merely on the passage of time
chronological snobbery
tautology
middle term
consistant
37. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
tu quoque
immediate reference
sound syllogism
induction
38. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
major term
figure
disagreement
fallacies of ambiguity
39. Contains the minor term
subcontrariety
distributed term
logical equivalence
minor premise
40. An illegimate appeal to authority
self-supporting statements
major premise
converse of a statement
ipse dixit
41. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
amphiboly
logic
ambiguous
contradiction
42. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
intension
real disagreement
amphiboly
logical equivalence
43. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
schema
tautology
counterexample
sound syllogism
44. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacy of accent
self-contradiction
fallacy of distraction
genus
45. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
intension
subcontrariety
informal fallacy
contrapositive of a statement
46. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
either/or
subject
argument`
mood
47. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
figure
post hoc ergo propter hoc
self-supporting statements
supported statements
48. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
categorical syllogism
mixed hypothetical syllogism
independance
division
49. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
division
pure hypothetical syllogism
minor premise
non sequitur
50. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
mood
independance
obverse of a statement
disagreement