SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A hasty generalization
apriorism
distributed term
sound syllogism
law of Non-Contradiction
2. Any statement is either true or false
consequent
law of excluded middle
composition
converse of a statement
3. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
contrary
argument`
post hoc ergo propter hoc
consistant
4. An argument based merely on the passage of time
chronological snobbery
figure
circular reasoning
counterexample
5. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
intension
self-contradiction
chronological snobbery
6. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
mixed hypothetical syllogism
statement
self-contradiction
apparent disagreement
7. Difference of opinion or perception
supported statements
enthymeme
apparent disagreement
fallacies of ambiguity
8. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
induction
apriorism
fallacy of accent
post hoc ergo propter hoc
9. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
subject
ipse dixit
counterexample
ad baculum
10. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
chronological snobbery
ad hominem
enthymeme
schema
11. An argument from lack of evidence
consequent
ad ignorantiam
middle term
independance
12. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
schema
self-supporting statements
quantity
contrapositive of a statement
13. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
contrapositive of a statement
consistant
argument`
major premise
14. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
non sequitur
converse of a statement
exclusives
tu quoque
15. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
immediate reference
verbal disagreement
circular reasoning
disagreement
16. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
enthymeme
extension
informal fallacy
chronological snobbery
17. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
formal logic
distributed term
middle term
division
18. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
antecedent
superimplication
mood
disagreement
19. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
ad hominem
fallacy of distraction
ipse dixit
subcontrariety
20. The science and art of reasoning well
informal fallacy
tu quoque
logic
ad baculum
21. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
ipse dixit
distributed term
contradiction
non sequitur
22. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
logic
complement of a term
valid
logical equivalence
23. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
division
law of Non-Contradiction
composition
major premise
24. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ambiguous
middle term
division
25. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
subcontrariety
extension
law of excluded middle
subimplication
26. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
composition
ipse dixit
sound syllogism
induction
27. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
self-supporting statements
categorical syllogism
schema
major term
28. The condition - the part following the 'if'
subcontrariety
converse of a statement
ad populum
antecedent
29. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
pure hypothetical syllogism
ad hominem
argument`
implication
30. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
obverse of a statement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
sound syllogism
exclusives
31. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
self-contradiction
real disagreement
extension
implication
32. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of form
apriorism
obverse of a statement
logic
33. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
bulverism
pure hypothetical syllogism
ambiguous
square of oppisition
34. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
apriorism
figure
self-supporting statements
antecedent
35. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
law of excluded middle
counterexample
minor premise
division
36. A concept that can be expressed precisely
conclusion
supported statements
fallacy of accent
term
37. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
pure hypothetical syllogism
circular reasoning
either/or
ad hominem
38. An illegimate appeal to authority
ipse dixit
logical equivalence
complement of a term
exclusives
39. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
tu quoque
fallacies of form
ambiguous
intension
40. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
statement
logic
implication
converse of a statement
41. Contains the minor term
ipse dixit
minor term
minor premise
apriorism
42. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacy of accent
law of excluded middle
circular reasoning
law of Non-Contradiction
43. If a statement is true - then it is true
subcontrariety
counterexample
law of identity
chronological snobbery
44. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
counterexample
minor term
enthymeme
45. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
contrapositive of a statement
amphiboly
sound syllogism
composition
46. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
division
contrapositive of a statement
verbal disagreement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
47. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
square of oppisition
distributed term
ad populum
bulverism
48. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
superimplication
mixed hypothetical syllogism
contrary
categorical syllogism
49. The set of all terms not included in the given term
ad hominem
complement of a term
logic
statement
50. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
immediate reference
consequent
informal fallacy
subcontrariety