SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
complement of a term
contradiction
subimplication
tautology
2. An argument from lack of evidence
ad ignorantiam
law of excluded middle
circular reasoning
hypothetical
3. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad baculum
argument`
ad hominem
law of excluded middle
4. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
genus
argument`
consequent
valid
5. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacies of ambiguity
contrary
either/or
enthymeme
6. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
equivocation
ad hominem
tu quoque
logical equivalence
7. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
mood
chronological snobbery
middle term
bulverism
8. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
hypothetical
logical equivalence
exclusives
law of identity
9. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
fallacies of ambiguity
pure hypothetical syllogism
complex question
real disagreement
10. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
non sequitur
contradiction
categorical syllogism
11. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
contrapositive of a statement
conclusion
intension
12. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
bulverism
disagreement
self-contradiction
counterexample
13. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
logic
counterexample
complex question
ad hominem
14. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacy of accent
valid
induction
consequent
15. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
formal logic
fallacies of ambiguity
either/or
fallacy of accent
16. The condition - the part following the 'if'
extension
amphiboly
statement
antecedent
17. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
informal fallacy
ad ignorantiam
fallacies of form
conclusion
18. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
statement
fallacy of accent
obverse of a statement
distributed term
19. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
consequent
converse of a statement
major term
subcontrariety
20. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
immediate reference
subimplication
apparent disagreement
informal fallacy
21. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
categorical syllogism
circular reasoning
subimplication
independance
22. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
contrapositive of a statement
subcontrariety
counterexample
apparent disagreement
23. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
valid
verbal disagreement
tautology
circular reasoning
24. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
tu quoque
fallacies of form
subject
equivocation
25. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
genus
converse of a statement
logic
self-supporting statements
26. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
independance
induction
either/or
equivocation
27. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
contradiction
complement of a term
chronological snobbery
quantity
28. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
contradiction
consequent
fallacies of ambiguity
29. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
fallacy of distraction
exclusives
argument`
ad baculum
30. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
post hoc ergo propter hoc
implication
division
middle term
31. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
law of Non-Contradiction
inclusive
minor term
mood
32. If a statement is true - then it is true
contrary
apparent disagreement
law of identity
formal logic
33. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
consistant
exclusives
superimplication
obverse of a statement
34. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
ad populum
pure hypothetical syllogism
self-contradiction
major premise
35. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
valid
hypothetical
superimplication
immediate reference
36. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
schema
genus
minor term
figure
37. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
intension
fallacies of form
exclusives
38. An argument based merely on the passage of time
formal logic
chronological snobbery
supported statements
non sequitur
39. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
ad hominem
antecedent
logical equivalence
subimplication
40. The science and art of reasoning well
logic
quantity
categorical syllogism
either/or
41. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
mood
apriorism
superimplication
verbal disagreement
42. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
major term
fallacy of distraction
tu quoque
converse of a statement
43. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
valid
disagreement
chronological snobbery
conclusion
44. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
ad hominem
categorical syllogism
mixed hypothetical syllogism
hypothetical
45. The premise containing the major term
law of identity
major premise
verbal disagreement
fallacies of form
46. Is valid and has true premises
sound syllogism
subimplication
major premise
bulverism
47. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
consistant
contrapositive of a statement
contradiction
sound syllogism
48. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
supported statements
non sequitur
implication
fallacies of ambiguity
49. A concept that can be expressed precisely
distributed term
term
logical equivalence
contrapositive of a statement
50. Any statement is either true or false
mixed hypothetical syllogism
law of excluded middle
complex question
supported statements