SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
amphiboly
mixed hypothetical syllogism
statement
induction
2. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
antecedent
chronological snobbery
square of oppisition
subcontrariety
3. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
ad baculum
composition
minor term
4. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
contrapositive of a statement
contrary
self-contradiction
square of oppisition
5. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
equivocation
pure hypothetical syllogism
verbal disagreement
contradiction
6. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
disagreement
hypothetical
circular reasoning
ambiguous
7. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
intension
induction
contrapositive of a statement
self-contradiction
8. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
distributed term
apriorism
exclusives
ad hominem
9. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
self-supporting statements
fallacy of distraction
antecedent
10. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
inclusive
conclusion
major term
law of identity
11. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
apparent disagreement
exclusives
disagreement
immediate reference
12. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
self-supporting statements
term
ambiguous
13. An illegimate appeal to authority
ad baculum
sound syllogism
inclusive
ipse dixit
14. The science and art of reasoning well
mood
logic
consequent
counterexample
15. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
immediate reference
fallacy of distraction
middle term
law of excluded middle
16. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
induction
subject
converse of a statement
either/or
17. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
law of Non-Contradiction
minor premise
composition
minor term
18. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
fallacies of form
inclusive
hypothetical
subimplication
19. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
chronological snobbery
supported statements
composition
contrapositive of a statement
20. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
logical equivalence
contrary
ad populum
quantity
21. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
tu quoque
immediate reference
tautology
enthymeme
22. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
valid
middle term
subimplication
mood
23. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
subject
mixed hypothetical syllogism
obverse of a statement
exclusives
24. The premise containing the major term
tautology
converse of a statement
major premise
consequent
25. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
non sequitur
major term
extension
consequent
26. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
ipse dixit
supported statements
intension
verbal disagreement
27. An argument from lack of evidence
ad ignorantiam
intension
self-supporting statements
contradiction
28. An argument based merely on the passage of time
equivocation
mood
chronological snobbery
real disagreement
29. The condition - the part following the 'if'
law of excluded middle
antecedent
supported statements
ad baculum
30. A hasty generalization
ipse dixit
apriorism
sound syllogism
figure
31. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
genus
obverse of a statement
distributed term
32. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
consequent
law of identity
immediate reference
subcontrariety
33. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
fallacies of ambiguity
complex question
contrary
ipse dixit
34. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
non sequitur
mood
tu quoque
exclusives
35. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
consistant
self-supporting statements
obverse of a statement
sound syllogism
36. A statement cannot be both true and false
logic
law of Non-Contradiction
minor term
non sequitur
37. Is valid and has true premises
mixed hypothetical syllogism
chronological snobbery
contrary
sound syllogism
38. A sentence which is either true or false
formal logic
chronological snobbery
conclusion
statement
39. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
ambiguous
circular reasoning
formal logic
valid
40. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
tautology
formal logic
categorical syllogism
contrary
41. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
distributed term
subimplication
fallacy of accent
counterexample
42. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
obverse of a statement
logical equivalence
categorical syllogism
verbal disagreement
43. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
schema
independance
ad baculum
extension
44. Contains the minor term
minor premise
superimplication
exclusives
either/or
45. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
minor premise
contrapositive of a statement
contradiction
implication
46. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
minor premise
either/or
complex question
independance
47. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
intension
mood
mixed hypothetical syllogism
converse of a statement
48. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
contrary
subject
logical equivalence
obverse of a statement
49. An illegitimate appeal to force
contradiction
figure
ad baculum
distributed term
50. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
consistant
amphiboly
argument`
law of identity