SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
verbal disagreement
ad hominem
contrapositive of a statement
implication
2. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
circular reasoning
apriorism
mood
intension
3. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
minor premise
real disagreement
formal logic
law of excluded middle
4. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
disagreement
either/or
logic
logical equivalence
5. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
subject
fallacy of distraction
self-supporting statements
valid
6. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
inclusive
figure
law of Non-Contradiction
valid
7. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
supported statements
logic
argument`
ambiguous
8. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
intension
subimplication
obverse of a statement
schema
9. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
bulverism
extension
genus
either/or
10. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
law of excluded middle
independance
immediate reference
subimplication
11. Any statement is either true or false
contradiction
self-supporting statements
middle term
law of excluded middle
12. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
hypothetical
self-supporting statements
self-contradiction
bulverism
13. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
division
obverse of a statement
major term
implication
14. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
major premise
apriorism
fallacy of accent
15. The set of all terms not included in the given term
complement of a term
square of oppisition
intension
consequent
16. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
tu quoque
figure
pure hypothetical syllogism
term
17. A sentence which is either true or false
pure hypothetical syllogism
ad hominem
statement
independance
18. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
supported statements
counterexample
apparent disagreement
complement of a term
19. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
genus
fallacy of distraction
ad baculum
fallacies of form
20. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
valid
self-contradiction
ad populum
contrary
21. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
contradiction
fallacies of ambiguity
mixed hypothetical syllogism
implication
22. The condition - the part following the 'if'
converse of a statement
antecedent
ambiguous
major premise
23. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
logic
antecedent
consequent
pure hypothetical syllogism
24. A statement cannot be both true and false
fallacies of form
law of Non-Contradiction
law of identity
implication
25. A concept that can be expressed precisely
genus
conclusion
amphiboly
term
26. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
ipse dixit
minor premise
apriorism
27. An argument from lack of evidence
contradiction
ad ignorantiam
equivocation
superimplication
28. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
obverse of a statement
enthymeme
bulverism
logical equivalence
29. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
contrapositive of a statement
figure
subject
superimplication
30. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
law of identity
informal fallacy
apparent disagreement
counterexample
31. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
enthymeme
obverse of a statement
quantity
consistant
32. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
contrapositive of a statement
ad populum
equivocation
ad ignorantiam
33. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
ad populum
subimplication
immediate reference
law of identity
34. Found once in each premise
complement of a term
middle term
induction
non sequitur
35. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
ad baculum
intension
quantity
immediate reference
36. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
supported statements
sound syllogism
formal logic
37. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
supported statements
law of identity
complex question
mixed hypothetical syllogism
38. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
minor term
consistant
tautology
fallacies of form
39. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
ad populum
mixed hypothetical syllogism
ambiguous
middle term
40. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
subject
ad ignorantiam
non sequitur
formal logic
41. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
verbal disagreement
statement
law of Non-Contradiction
subcontrariety
42. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
superimplication
fallacy of distraction
consistant
antecedent
43. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
equivocation
bulverism
contrary
division
44. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
major term
complex question
division
mood
45. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
contrapositive of a statement
antecedent
division
self-supporting statements
46. An illegitimate appeal to force
pure hypothetical syllogism
logical equivalence
ad baculum
immediate reference
47. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
conclusion
valid
equivocation
term
48. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
bulverism
induction
supported statements
law of excluded middle
49. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
genus
self-contradiction
division
counterexample
50. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
independance
bulverism
chronological snobbery
induction