SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
either/or
contradiction
categorical syllogism
statement
2. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
sound syllogism
superimplication
complex question
quantity
3. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
enthymeme
valid
ad baculum
square of oppisition
4. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
obverse of a statement
ad populum
supported statements
amphiboly
5. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
mood
enthymeme
genus
contradiction
6. An argument from lack of evidence
chronological snobbery
ad ignorantiam
composition
tautology
7. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
figure
intension
subject
ad baculum
8. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
hypothetical
ad ignorantiam
implication
9. An illegitimate appeal to force
verbal disagreement
apparent disagreement
ipse dixit
ad baculum
10. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
middle term
schema
ad populum
fallacies of form
11. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
inclusive
real disagreement
converse of a statement
self-supporting statements
12. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
induction
extension
fallacy of accent
apriorism
13. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
figure
informal fallacy
self-supporting statements
major premise
14. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
subcontrariety
self-supporting statements
formal logic
logic
15. A statement cannot be both true and false
ipse dixit
ad populum
square of oppisition
law of Non-Contradiction
16. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
implication
intension
contrary
complex question
17. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of identity
fallacy of accent
superimplication
converse of a statement
18. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
post hoc ergo propter hoc
logical equivalence
sound syllogism
chronological snobbery
19. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
law of identity
distributed term
complex question
20. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
counterexample
subcontrariety
antecedent
21. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
inclusive
equivocation
post hoc ergo propter hoc
complex question
22. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
tu quoque
genus
tautology
post hoc ergo propter hoc
23. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
either/or
fallacy of accent
law of Non-Contradiction
24. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
tu quoque
square of oppisition
consistant
fallacies of ambiguity
25. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
logic
valid
induction
law of excluded middle
26. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
figure
complex question
mixed hypothetical syllogism
counterexample
27. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
subject
converse of a statement
amphiboly
verbal disagreement
28. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacies of ambiguity
intension
contrapositive of a statement
induction
29. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
logical equivalence
sound syllogism
ad hominem
pure hypothetical syllogism
30. The condition - the part following the 'if'
composition
ad hominem
antecedent
verbal disagreement
31. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
disagreement
supported statements
square of oppisition
informal fallacy
32. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
fallacies of ambiguity
self-supporting statements
law of identity
formal logic
33. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
ad baculum
induction
contradiction
circular reasoning
34. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
chronological snobbery
immediate reference
minor premise
post hoc ergo propter hoc
35. Contains the minor term
immediate reference
distributed term
minor premise
genus
36. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
equivocation
circular reasoning
antecedent
consistant
37. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
schema
major premise
non sequitur
subcontrariety
38. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
argument`
circular reasoning
tautology
contradiction
39. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
formal logic
figure
self-contradiction
ad populum
40. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
apriorism
ipse dixit
major term
conclusion
41. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
antecedent
superimplication
counterexample
distributed term
42. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
hypothetical
equivocation
law of identity
major term
43. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
contrary
complex question
implication
contradiction
44. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
subcontrariety
consistant
mood
pure hypothetical syllogism
45. The set of all terms not included in the given term
division
logic
obverse of a statement
complement of a term
46. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of form
supported statements
subcontrariety
tu quoque
47. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
consequent
supported statements
contradiction
fallacy of distraction
48. Is valid and has true premises
pure hypothetical syllogism
sound syllogism
ambiguous
induction
49. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
independance
inclusive
distributed term
induction
50. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
obverse of a statement
either/or
statement
real disagreement