SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
fallacies of ambiguity
induction
division
circular reasoning
2. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
major term
complement of a term
ad populum
genus
3. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
self-contradiction
contradiction
exclusives
consistant
4. A concept that can be expressed precisely
figure
subimplication
independance
term
5. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
valid
consequent
law of identity
intension
6. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
division
ad baculum
tautology
superimplication
7. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
self-supporting statements
law of identity
circular reasoning
converse of a statement
8. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
sound syllogism
implication
major premise
complex question
9. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
self-contradiction
subcontrariety
informal fallacy
self-supporting statements
10. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
chronological snobbery
consequent
mood
supported statements
11. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
formal logic
self-supporting statements
subcontrariety
subject
12. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
mixed hypothetical syllogism
either/or
self-contradiction
contrary
13. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
valid
inclusive
minor premise
enthymeme
14. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
major term
figure
fallacies of ambiguity
distributed term
15. The premise containing the major term
independance
mood
major premise
square of oppisition
16. Any statement is either true or false
ad ignorantiam
law of excluded middle
major premise
immediate reference
17. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
middle term
fallacy of distraction
contradiction
superimplication
18. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
inclusive
chronological snobbery
disagreement
bulverism
19. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
formal logic
tautology
genus
fallacy of accent
20. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
logic
inclusive
quantity
subimplication
21. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
fallacies of ambiguity
real disagreement
apriorism
complex question
22. The condition - the part following the 'if'
antecedent
converse of a statement
immediate reference
figure
23. An illegimate appeal to authority
self-supporting statements
ipse dixit
independance
bulverism
24. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
intension
supported statements
quantity
counterexample
25. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
immediate reference
enthymeme
subimplication
consistant
26. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
fallacy of distraction
mood
consistant
intension
27. A sentence which is either true or false
hypothetical
law of identity
statement
fallacies of form
28. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
verbal disagreement
independance
self-contradiction
disagreement
29. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacies of ambiguity
ad hominem
fallacies of form
post hoc ergo propter hoc
30. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacy of accent
conclusion
amphiboly
counterexample
31. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
distributed term
independance
intension
contradiction
32. Found once in each premise
division
middle term
intension
enthymeme
33. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
informal fallacy
categorical syllogism
amphiboly
consequent
34. An illegitimate appeal to force
complex question
hypothetical
ad baculum
ad ignorantiam
35. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
subject
mixed hypothetical syllogism
complex question
induction
36. A statement cannot be both true and false
complement of a term
either/or
law of Non-Contradiction
self-supporting statements
37. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
circular reasoning
conclusion
fallacy of distraction
counterexample
38. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
categorical syllogism
fallacy of accent
genus
exclusives
39. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
bulverism
disagreement
law of Non-Contradiction
antecedent
40. The science and art of reasoning well
supported statements
independance
logic
law of Non-Contradiction
41. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
square of oppisition
minor term
equivocation
law of excluded middle
42. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
ad hominem
mood
counterexample
self-supporting statements
43. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
converse of a statement
superimplication
contrary
tu quoque
44. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
conclusion
counterexample
amphiboly
implication
45. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
real disagreement
tautology
immediate reference
pure hypothetical syllogism
46. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
middle term
tu quoque
subcontrariety
extension
47. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
ad populum
tautology
chronological snobbery
law of identity
48. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
enthymeme
ambiguous
fallacies of ambiguity
contrary
49. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
converse of a statement
major premise
apparent disagreement
logic
50. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
division
ad baculum
converse of a statement
non sequitur