SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. An illegimate appeal to authority
amphiboly
ipse dixit
consequent
square of oppisition
2. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
antecedent
complex question
counterexample
fallacy of accent
3. Found once in each premise
apparent disagreement
equivocation
disagreement
middle term
4. The premise containing the major term
middle term
major premise
formal logic
pure hypothetical syllogism
5. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
obverse of a statement
genus
bulverism
immediate reference
6. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
disagreement
independance
real disagreement
7. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
informal fallacy
mixed hypothetical syllogism
term
major term
8. Contains the minor term
conclusion
post hoc ergo propter hoc
complement of a term
minor premise
9. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
division
minor premise
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ad baculum
10. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
contrary
complex question
bulverism
term
11. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
disagreement
fallacy of distraction
induction
conclusion
12. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
self-supporting statements
contrary
argument`
complex question
13. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
minor premise
argument`
fallacies of form
extension
14. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
pure hypothetical syllogism
subcontrariety
obverse of a statement
tu quoque
15. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
composition
superimplication
ad hominem
schema
16. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
law of identity
circular reasoning
non sequitur
pure hypothetical syllogism
17. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
contrary
subimplication
sound syllogism
distributed term
18. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
real disagreement
logic
valid
subimplication
19. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
self-contradiction
fallacy of accent
circular reasoning
division
20. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
logical equivalence
fallacies of form
inclusive
argument`
21. The science and art of reasoning well
contrary
bulverism
sound syllogism
logic
22. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
pure hypothetical syllogism
genus
enthymeme
major term
23. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
categorical syllogism
enthymeme
distributed term
valid
24. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
ad baculum
figure
composition
logic
25. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
term
subcontrariety
logical equivalence
fallacies of form
26. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
quantity
intension
law of identity
disagreement
27. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
equivocation
amphiboly
fallacy of accent
fallacies of ambiguity
28. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
extension
formal logic
informal fallacy
consistant
29. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
verbal disagreement
fallacy of accent
minor term
intension
30. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
implication
superimplication
major term
extension
31. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
contrary
hypothetical
induction
32. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
converse of a statement
independance
superimplication
ad baculum
33. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
statement
pure hypothetical syllogism
ambiguous
independance
34. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
real disagreement
exclusives
supported statements
induction
35. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
valid
subject
pure hypothetical syllogism
fallacies of ambiguity
36. An argument from lack of evidence
subject
extension
ad ignorantiam
categorical syllogism
37. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
obverse of a statement
non sequitur
bulverism
immediate reference
38. A statement cannot be both true and false
law of Non-Contradiction
counterexample
disagreement
minor premise
39. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
distributed term
figure
chronological snobbery
division
40. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
major premise
minor term
consequent
supported statements
41. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
implication
non sequitur
self-supporting statements
contradiction
42. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
logical equivalence
ad baculum
major term
argument`
43. The condition - the part following the 'if'
complement of a term
tu quoque
counterexample
antecedent
44. A hasty generalization
extension
subcontrariety
ipse dixit
apriorism
45. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
exclusives
contrary
ad ignorantiam
mood
46. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
fallacy of accent
independance
ad hominem
ad populum
47. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
immediate reference
circular reasoning
self-contradiction
sound syllogism
48. A concept that can be expressed precisely
distributed term
extension
term
ad baculum
49. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
disagreement
superimplication
statement
mood
50. A sentence which is either true or false
counterexample
statement
consequent
apparent disagreement