SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
major premise
mood
formal logic
2. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
hypothetical
complement of a term
formal logic
logical equivalence
3. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
induction
chronological snobbery
square of oppisition
amphiboly
4. An illegimate appeal to authority
ipse dixit
ad hominem
fallacy of accent
term
5. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
division
minor premise
either/or
informal fallacy
6. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
subject
logical equivalence
fallacy of accent
major term
7. The condition - the part following the 'if'
antecedent
categorical syllogism
independance
valid
8. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
induction
ipse dixit
major premise
genus
9. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
ad baculum
chronological snobbery
superimplication
square of oppisition
10. A statement cannot be both true and false
law of Non-Contradiction
fallacy of distraction
term
conclusion
11. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
self-supporting statements
self-contradiction
real disagreement
apriorism
12. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
tautology
ambiguous
middle term
13. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
real disagreement
subimplication
law of excluded middle
14. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
supported statements
post hoc ergo propter hoc
circular reasoning
pure hypothetical syllogism
15. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
apriorism
categorical syllogism
bulverism
real disagreement
16. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
term
logical equivalence
sound syllogism
mixed hypothetical syllogism
17. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
figure
enthymeme
tu quoque
major premise
18. An argument based merely on the passage of time
informal fallacy
distributed term
equivocation
chronological snobbery
19. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
complex question
hypothetical
major term
subimplication
20. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
tu quoque
hypothetical
statement
composition
21. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
consequent
post hoc ergo propter hoc
self-supporting statements
tautology
22. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
division
term
major premise
valid
23. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
genus
exclusives
minor premise
enthymeme
24. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
complex question
conclusion
division
ambiguous
25. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
logical equivalence
law of Non-Contradiction
square of oppisition
major term
26. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
converse of a statement
minor term
subject
27. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
post hoc ergo propter hoc
quantity
apparent disagreement
conclusion
28. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
converse of a statement
term
complement of a term
implication
29. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad hominem
counterexample
ad baculum
apriorism
30. Any statement is either true or false
verbal disagreement
real disagreement
law of excluded middle
fallacy of distraction
31. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
logic
ambiguous
ad ignorantiam
disagreement
32. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
division
ad hominem
term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
33. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
tautology
middle term
inclusive
equivocation
34. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
real disagreement
apriorism
induction
inclusive
35. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
converse of a statement
implication
induction
consistant
36. Contains the minor term
hypothetical
schema
minor premise
amphiboly
37. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
ad populum
contrary
equivocation
mood
38. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of excluded middle
law of identity
valid
either/or
39. The science and art of reasoning well
logic
implication
ambiguous
apriorism
40. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
pure hypothetical syllogism
division
obverse of a statement
41. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
term
obverse of a statement
minor term
ad baculum
42. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
converse of a statement
exclusives
fallacy of distraction
independance
43. The set of all terms not included in the given term
amphiboly
verbal disagreement
complement of a term
ad populum
44. A concept that can be expressed precisely
bulverism
term
extension
independance
45. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
amphiboly
quantity
self-contradiction
argument`
46. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
exclusives
contrary
superimplication
disagreement
47. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
consequent
fallacy of distraction
fallacies of form
equivocation
48. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
obverse of a statement
chronological snobbery
minor term
inclusive
49. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ambiguous
argument`
post hoc ergo propter hoc
self-supporting statements
50. Is valid and has true premises
amphiboly
intension
sound syllogism
fallacies of form