SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A concept that can be expressed precisely
ad baculum
term
hypothetical
division
2. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
genus
hypothetical
subcontrariety
counterexample
3. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
immediate reference
middle term
either/or
extension
4. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
middle term
mixed hypothetical syllogism
categorical syllogism
fallacies of form
5. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
independance
minor premise
obverse of a statement
immediate reference
6. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
subimplication
fallacy of accent
intension
obverse of a statement
7. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ad ignorantiam
superimplication
valid
8. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
immediate reference
law of identity
division
consistant
9. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
tu quoque
fallacy of distraction
verbal disagreement
ad hominem
10. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
middle term
ad baculum
converse of a statement
11. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
inclusive
real disagreement
tautology
ad ignorantiam
12. Is valid and has true premises
hypothetical
ad hominem
intension
sound syllogism
13. A statement cannot be both true and false
sound syllogism
law of Non-Contradiction
fallacies of ambiguity
distributed term
14. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
contrary
obverse of a statement
amphiboly
composition
15. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
subimplication
self-contradiction
ad ignorantiam
contradiction
16. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
tautology
statement
genus
post hoc ergo propter hoc
17. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
supported statements
ambiguous
law of identity
major term
18. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
law of identity
self-contradiction
pure hypothetical syllogism
major term
19. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
inclusive
law of identity
obverse of a statement
complex question
20. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
superimplication
self-contradiction
schema
contradiction
21. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
mood
complement of a term
law of Non-Contradiction
self-supporting statements
22. The condition - the part following the 'if'
distributed term
logic
antecedent
post hoc ergo propter hoc
23. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
amphiboly
subcontrariety
contrary
minor term
24. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
complement of a term
term
superimplication
logic
25. Found once in each premise
contrary
mood
induction
middle term
26. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
major premise
middle term
mood
fallacies of form
27. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
division
hypothetical
formal logic
logical equivalence
28. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
counterexample
chronological snobbery
complex question
non sequitur
29. If a statement is true - then it is true
subimplication
pure hypothetical syllogism
fallacy of accent
law of identity
30. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
chronological snobbery
subimplication
distributed term
exclusives
31. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
distributed term
mood
converse of a statement
consistant
32. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
categorical syllogism
inclusive
consistant
quantity
33. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
implication
independance
either/or
ad hominem
34. Difference of opinion or perception
mood
logical equivalence
either/or
apparent disagreement
35. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
chronological snobbery
ad hominem
counterexample
schema
36. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
supported statements
self-contradiction
self-supporting statements
ipse dixit
37. A hasty generalization
inclusive
apriorism
fallacy of accent
minor premise
38. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
self-supporting statements
ad populum
post hoc ergo propter hoc
subimplication
39. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
middle term
mixed hypothetical syllogism
contrary
extension
40. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
term
disagreement
major premise
exclusives
41. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
categorical syllogism
division
ad ignorantiam
complex question
42. Any statement is either true or false
sound syllogism
tautology
law of excluded middle
tu quoque
43. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
schema
genus
converse of a statement
contrary
44. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacies of ambiguity
logic
extension
figure
45. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
logic
post hoc ergo propter hoc
schema
consistant
46. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
composition
enthymeme
implication
counterexample
47. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
obverse of a statement
informal fallacy
law of excluded middle
ad populum
48. An argument from lack of evidence
complex question
supported statements
ad ignorantiam
tautology
49. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
ad ignorantiam
ambiguous
informal fallacy
converse of a statement
50. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
independance
sound syllogism
informal fallacy