SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
enthymeme
counterexample
inclusive
argument`
2. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
composition
subcontrariety
fallacies of ambiguity
3. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
bulverism
verbal disagreement
fallacies of form
intension
4. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
contrary
converse of a statement
amphiboly
ambiguous
5. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
inclusive
exclusives
law of identity
6. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
self-contradiction
exclusives
intension
post hoc ergo propter hoc
7. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
ipse dixit
sound syllogism
ad hominem
consequent
8. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
enthymeme
contradiction
counterexample
9. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
conclusion
figure
categorical syllogism
10. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
subject
ambiguous
immediate reference
contrapositive of a statement
11. An argument from lack of evidence
supported statements
mood
ad ignorantiam
circular reasoning
12. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad hominem
subcontrariety
counterexample
contrapositive of a statement
13. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
self-supporting statements
ad ignorantiam
formal logic
complement of a term
14. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
square of oppisition
contrapositive of a statement
middle term
non sequitur
15. Any statement is either true or false
middle term
self-contradiction
law of excluded middle
contrapositive of a statement
16. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
counterexample
term
subcontrariety
major premise
17. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
antecedent
contrapositive of a statement
exclusives
non sequitur
18. A hasty generalization
self-supporting statements
law of identity
inclusive
apriorism
19. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
tu quoque
contradiction
induction
consistant
20. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
middle term
immediate reference
major premise
tautology
21. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
conclusion
amphiboly
categorical syllogism
chronological snobbery
22. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ipse dixit
ad ignorantiam
fallacies of ambiguity
23. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
minor premise
independance
bulverism
converse of a statement
24. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
minor term
subcontrariety
valid
immediate reference
25. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
consistant
enthymeme
informal fallacy
26. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
hypothetical
fallacy of distraction
contradiction
distributed term
27. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
pure hypothetical syllogism
quantity
circular reasoning
intension
28. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
consequent
tautology
contradiction
disagreement
29. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
subimplication
either/or
self-supporting statements
consistant
30. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
informal fallacy
immediate reference
extension
division
31. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
law of excluded middle
ambiguous
subject
ad populum
32. Contains the minor term
law of Non-Contradiction
complex question
fallacies of ambiguity
minor premise
33. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
argument`
implication
either/or
conclusion
34. Is valid and has true premises
sound syllogism
verbal disagreement
supported statements
consequent
35. The premise containing the major term
major term
contrary
chronological snobbery
major premise
36. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
independance
consequent
subject
categorical syllogism
37. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
verbal disagreement
superimplication
immediate reference
major premise
38. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
implication
ad populum
division
self-supporting statements
39. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
figure
valid
pure hypothetical syllogism
apriorism
40. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
ad populum
quantity
term
schema
41. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
subject
composition
apparent disagreement
ipse dixit
42. A statement cannot be both true and false
fallacies of form
superimplication
law of identity
law of Non-Contradiction
43. Found once in each premise
circular reasoning
minor term
middle term
schema
44. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
contrary
exclusives
sound syllogism
tu quoque
45. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
antecedent
logic
converse of a statement
46. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
self-supporting statements
contrapositive of a statement
supported statements
fallacy of distraction
47. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
apparent disagreement
enthymeme
square of oppisition
48. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
argument`
pure hypothetical syllogism
valid
counterexample
49. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
subject
extension
implication
tautology
50. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
self-contradiction
logical equivalence
obverse of a statement
equivocation