SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
logic
composition
law of identity
major premise
2. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
division
apriorism
ad baculum
conclusion
3. An argument based merely on the passage of time
categorical syllogism
chronological snobbery
enthymeme
ad hominem
4. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
equivocation
fallacy of accent
amphiboly
5. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of form
contradiction
counterexample
valid
6. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
hypothetical
figure
formal logic
ipse dixit
7. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
complement of a term
antecedent
fallacy of accent
ad populum
8. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacies of ambiguity
mood
term
law of identity
9. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
subcontrariety
middle term
self-contradiction
fallacies of ambiguity
10. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
fallacies of ambiguity
composition
mood
extension
11. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
contradiction
genus
bulverism
informal fallacy
12. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
figure
independance
composition
pure hypothetical syllogism
13. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ad baculum
inclusive
term
ambiguous
14. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
schema
amphiboly
tautology
bulverism
15. Any statement is either true or false
ad ignorantiam
fallacy of accent
law of Non-Contradiction
law of excluded middle
16. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
valid
ad hominem
circular reasoning
extension
17. An illegimate appeal to authority
subcontrariety
mood
ipse dixit
self-contradiction
18. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
independance
pure hypothetical syllogism
consistant
subcontrariety
19. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
sound syllogism
quantity
implication
20. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
quantity
fallacies of ambiguity
ad baculum
intension
21. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
valid
ad populum
hypothetical
major term
22. Found once in each premise
middle term
complex question
minor term
subcontrariety
23. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
disagreement
ambiguous
valid
post hoc ergo propter hoc
24. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
immediate reference
complex question
law of excluded middle
25. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
ambiguous
consistant
formal logic
composition
26. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
contrapositive of a statement
hypothetical
ad ignorantiam
genus
27. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
exclusives
argument`
fallacy of accent
tu quoque
28. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
consistant
post hoc ergo propter hoc
obverse of a statement
subimplication
29. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
equivocation
composition
term
fallacy of distraction
30. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
law of excluded middle
tu quoque
pure hypothetical syllogism
31. The set of all terms not included in the given term
subcontrariety
complement of a term
consequent
independance
32. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
square of oppisition
self-supporting statements
disagreement
subject
33. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
inclusive
major term
self-contradiction
consistant
34. The condition - the part following the 'if'
superimplication
major term
statement
antecedent
35. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
genus
fallacy of distraction
quantity
minor premise
36. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
equivocation
logical equivalence
major premise
ad populum
37. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
ad baculum
pure hypothetical syllogism
amphiboly
apparent disagreement
38. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
minor term
major term
tu quoque
self-contradiction
39. The premise containing the major term
contrary
ipse dixit
major premise
implication
40. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
middle term
law of excluded middle
hypothetical
verbal disagreement
41. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
verbal disagreement
obverse of a statement
law of identity
figure
42. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
ambiguous
apriorism
complex question
statement
43. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
implication
informal fallacy
consistant
circular reasoning
44. Contains the minor term
exclusives
term
fallacy of distraction
minor premise
45. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
supported statements
apparent disagreement
exclusives
either/or
46. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
pure hypothetical syllogism
implication
inclusive
fallacies of ambiguity
47. The science and art of reasoning well
logic
apparent disagreement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
self-supporting statements
48. A hasty generalization
apriorism
converse of a statement
genus
independance
49. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
self-contradiction
ad hominem
composition
superimplication
50. If a statement is true - then it is true
major term
inclusive
law of identity
obverse of a statement