SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The science and art of reasoning well
logic
sound syllogism
either/or
tautology
2. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
non sequitur
tautology
fallacies of ambiguity
disagreement
3. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
apriorism
argument`
minor premise
verbal disagreement
4. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
real disagreement
disagreement
subcontrariety
amphiboly
5. An argument from lack of evidence
mood
consistant
non sequitur
ad ignorantiam
6. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
mood
schema
bulverism
logic
7. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
categorical syllogism
apparent disagreement
genus
disagreement
8. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
tautology
fallacies of form
conclusion
9. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
law of Non-Contradiction
formal logic
non sequitur
superimplication
10. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
supported statements
intension
subject
quantity
11. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
non sequitur
composition
complex question
valid
12. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
equivocation
induction
subcontrariety
superimplication
13. An illegitimate appeal to force
ad hominem
ad baculum
chronological snobbery
composition
14. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
extension
figure
equivocation
ad ignorantiam
15. The premise containing the major term
induction
genus
fallacies of ambiguity
major premise
16. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
tu quoque
self-supporting statements
law of excluded middle
apparent disagreement
17. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
superimplication
contrary
term
minor premise
18. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
circular reasoning
disagreement
division
contrapositive of a statement
19. A statement cannot be both true and false
law of Non-Contradiction
enthymeme
apriorism
mood
20. A hasty generalization
quantity
minor premise
apriorism
fallacy of accent
21. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
valid
self-supporting statements
law of Non-Contradiction
division
22. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
verbal disagreement
converse of a statement
equivocation
circular reasoning
23. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
formal logic
composition
middle term
self-contradiction
24. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
tautology
informal fallacy
circular reasoning
bulverism
25. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
apparent disagreement
exclusives
quantity
self-supporting statements
26. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
term
converse of a statement
figure
induction
27. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
hypothetical
verbal disagreement
counterexample
intension
28. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
logic
immediate reference
ad ignorantiam
minor term
29. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of form
distributed term
self-contradiction
informal fallacy
30. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
extension
tautology
consistant
conclusion
31. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
law of identity
superimplication
intension
conclusion
32. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
tu quoque
induction
pure hypothetical syllogism
fallacies of form
33. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
contrapositive of a statement
quantity
supported statements
ad hominem
34. An illegimate appeal to authority
fallacy of distraction
ipse dixit
induction
fallacy of accent
35. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
square of oppisition
hypothetical
subject
schema
36. The set of all terms not included in the given term
implication
complement of a term
division
ipse dixit
37. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
argument`
formal logic
logical equivalence
verbal disagreement
38. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad hominem
sound syllogism
informal fallacy
converse of a statement
39. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
sound syllogism
chronological snobbery
logical equivalence
post hoc ergo propter hoc
40. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
ad hominem
logic
subcontrariety
real disagreement
41. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
tautology
law of Non-Contradiction
chronological snobbery
term
42. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
informal fallacy
implication
self-contradiction
major premise
43. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
categorical syllogism
self-supporting statements
division
mood
44. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
contrapositive of a statement
term
immediate reference
square of oppisition
45. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
extension
quantity
superimplication
consequent
46. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
contradiction
inclusive
major term
ambiguous
47. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
ad populum
mixed hypothetical syllogism
induction
amphiboly
48. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacy of accent
major term
law of identity
valid
49. Difference of opinion or perception
genus
mood
apparent disagreement
square of oppisition
50. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
intension
distributed term
bulverism
enthymeme