SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A hasty generalization
informal fallacy
complex question
statement
apriorism
2. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
contradiction
apparent disagreement
chronological snobbery
schema
3. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
superimplication
immediate reference
contrary
counterexample
4. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
middle term
minor term
mood
logical equivalence
5. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
hypothetical
square of oppisition
fallacy of accent
inclusive
6. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
logical equivalence
consistant
exclusives
counterexample
7. An argument from lack of evidence
minor term
ad ignorantiam
extension
pure hypothetical syllogism
8. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
complex question
implication
inclusive
contrary
9. Is valid and has true premises
equivocation
converse of a statement
circular reasoning
sound syllogism
10. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
chronological snobbery
obverse of a statement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
11. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ambiguous
ad baculum
inclusive
immediate reference
12. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacy of accent
amphiboly
intension
non sequitur
13. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
pure hypothetical syllogism
obverse of a statement
middle term
chronological snobbery
14. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
bulverism
contradiction
pure hypothetical syllogism
supported statements
15. Found once in each premise
composition
middle term
hypothetical
square of oppisition
16. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
equivocation
fallacy of accent
self-supporting statements
17. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
contrapositive of a statement
minor premise
either/or
supported statements
18. The condition - the part following the 'if'
antecedent
extension
self-supporting statements
genus
19. The science and art of reasoning well
ad ignorantiam
logic
subimplication
figure
20. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
complex question
conclusion
composition
real disagreement
21. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
implication
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ad populum
ambiguous
22. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
converse of a statement
quantity
contrapositive of a statement
law of identity
23. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
real disagreement
valid
ad hominem
distributed term
24. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
composition
contradiction
non sequitur
hypothetical
25. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
law of excluded middle
self-supporting statements
equivocation
subject
26. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
ambiguous
minor term
induction
extension
27. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
intension
superimplication
quantity
tu quoque
28. An argument based merely on the passage of time
chronological snobbery
supported statements
independance
tautology
29. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
induction
fallacies of ambiguity
hypothetical
self-supporting statements
30. The set of all terms not included in the given term
formal logic
converse of a statement
complement of a term
sound syllogism
31. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
induction
pure hypothetical syllogism
counterexample
ad populum
32. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
division
law of excluded middle
composition
circular reasoning
33. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
circular reasoning
ad baculum
ad populum
ipse dixit
34. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
apriorism
superimplication
immediate reference
informal fallacy
35. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
inclusive
equivocation
post hoc ergo propter hoc
subject
36. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
fallacies of form
argument`
contrary
either/or
37. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
genus
independance
middle term
mixed hypothetical syllogism
38. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
ad ignorantiam
ambiguous
fallacy of distraction
post hoc ergo propter hoc
39. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
minor premise
figure
distributed term
ad hominem
40. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
contrary
ad hominem
equivocation
valid
41. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
schema
subimplication
law of excluded middle
equivocation
42. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
law of identity
enthymeme
fallacies of form
bulverism
43. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
non sequitur
mixed hypothetical syllogism
fallacies of ambiguity
schema
44. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of ambiguity
argument`
fallacies of form
informal fallacy
45. An illegimate appeal to authority
square of oppisition
ad baculum
ipse dixit
statement
46. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
induction
chronological snobbery
law of Non-Contradiction
47. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
formal logic
conclusion
contrapositive of a statement
equivocation
48. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
verbal disagreement
inclusive
square of oppisition
antecedent
49. Difference of opinion or perception
chronological snobbery
verbal disagreement
logic
apparent disagreement
50. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
pure hypothetical syllogism
superimplication
consequent
tautology