SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
apriorism
tu quoque
quantity
2. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
sound syllogism
argument`
composition
valid
3. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
ad hominem
categorical syllogism
ambiguous
chronological snobbery
4. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
hypothetical
apparent disagreement
figure
counterexample
5. Contains the minor term
supported statements
valid
apparent disagreement
minor premise
6. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
genus
obverse of a statement
logical equivalence
fallacy of distraction
7. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
major premise
immediate reference
fallacy of distraction
subcontrariety
8. An argument based merely on the passage of time
ambiguous
supported statements
obverse of a statement
chronological snobbery
9. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
contrapositive of a statement
fallacies of form
obverse of a statement
ad ignorantiam
10. A sentence which is either true or false
intension
statement
self-supporting statements
consequent
11. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
contradiction
immediate reference
argument`
valid
12. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
mood
fallacy of distraction
logical equivalence
converse of a statement
13. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
ipse dixit
exclusives
conclusion
intension
14. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
induction
apparent disagreement
chronological snobbery
mixed hypothetical syllogism
15. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
ambiguous
law of identity
fallacy of accent
complex question
16. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
real disagreement
hypothetical
figure
superimplication
17. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
subimplication
tu quoque
post hoc ergo propter hoc
conclusion
18. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
formal logic
ipse dixit
circular reasoning
apparent disagreement
19. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
informal fallacy
fallacies of form
quantity
fallacies of ambiguity
20. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
law of identity
inclusive
sound syllogism
major term
21. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
division
hypothetical
ipse dixit
tautology
22. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
genus
logical equivalence
formal logic
self-supporting statements
23. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
figure
sound syllogism
antecedent
fallacy of accent
24. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor term
amphiboly
equivocation
counterexample
25. Is valid and has true premises
immediate reference
apparent disagreement
sound syllogism
complement of a term
26. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
argument`
tu quoque
law of excluded middle
division
27. A statement cannot be both true and false
converse of a statement
logical equivalence
circular reasoning
law of Non-Contradiction
28. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
ambiguous
consistant
formal logic
real disagreement
29. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
equivocation
induction
antecedent
mixed hypothetical syllogism
30. An argument from lack of evidence
distributed term
converse of a statement
either/or
ad ignorantiam
31. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
supported statements
independance
figure
subject
32. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
consequent
post hoc ergo propter hoc
extension
ad baculum
33. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
extension
intension
statement
self-supporting statements
34. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
intension
ad baculum
contrary
non sequitur
35. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
equivocation
distributed term
intension
apparent disagreement
36. The set of all terms not included in the given term
logical equivalence
complement of a term
term
consistant
37. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
distributed term
self-contradiction
statement
complex question
38. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
bulverism
extension
apparent disagreement
tu quoque
39. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
division
valid
converse of a statement
intension
40. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
ad hominem
consistant
obverse of a statement
circular reasoning
41. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
superimplication
square of oppisition
consequent
minor term
42. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
subimplication
schema
independance
pure hypothetical syllogism
43. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
induction
immediate reference
ad hominem
complement of a term
44. If a statement is true - then it is true
ad baculum
law of identity
ad hominem
fallacy of distraction
45. The condition - the part following the 'if'
implication
extension
tu quoque
antecedent
46. An illegimate appeal to authority
contrary
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ipse dixit
independance
47. A concept that can be expressed precisely
term
minor premise
converse of a statement
division
48. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
law of identity
law of excluded middle
conclusion
equivocation
49. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
exclusives
categorical syllogism
division
law of identity
50. A hasty generalization
apriorism
minor premise
ad hominem
verbal disagreement