SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
contrary
contrapositive of a statement
fallacies of form
consistant
2. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
ambiguous
independance
induction
law of identity
3. The set of all terms not included in the given term
complement of a term
middle term
conclusion
antecedent
4. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
superimplication
statement
fallacy of accent
amphiboly
5. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
extension
conclusion
complement of a term
self-contradiction
6. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
extension
non sequitur
term
self-supporting statements
7. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
valid
categorical syllogism
non sequitur
disagreement
8. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
supported statements
figure
immediate reference
fallacy of distraction
9. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
informal fallacy
argument`
hypothetical
figure
10. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
square of oppisition
statement
apparent disagreement
tu quoque
11. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
obverse of a statement
square of oppisition
contradiction
conclusion
12. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
complex question
obverse of a statement
minor premise
ipse dixit
13. The premise containing the major term
chronological snobbery
major premise
post hoc ergo propter hoc
fallacy of accent
14. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
real disagreement
contrary
bulverism
ad ignorantiam
15. An argument based merely on the passage of time
chronological snobbery
tu quoque
supported statements
ad populum
16. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
mixed hypothetical syllogism
informal fallacy
real disagreement
immediate reference
17. An argument from lack of evidence
non sequitur
chronological snobbery
ad ignorantiam
contrary
18. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
equivocation
law of Non-Contradiction
conclusion
circular reasoning
19. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
middle term
complex question
law of Non-Contradiction
consequent
20. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
schema
tu quoque
apparent disagreement
enthymeme
21. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
formal logic
equivocation
fallacy of distraction
self-contradiction
22. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
tu quoque
square of oppisition
contradiction
complex question
23. An illegitimate appeal to force
minor premise
fallacies of ambiguity
enthymeme
ad baculum
24. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
real disagreement
minor premise
subimplication
equivocation
25. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
logical equivalence
fallacy of distraction
formal logic
either/or
26. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
ad ignorantiam
middle term
superimplication
distributed term
27. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
formal logic
supported statements
minor premise
28. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
chronological snobbery
implication
bulverism
subimplication
29. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
self-contradiction
law of identity
ad populum
fallacy of distraction
30. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
non sequitur
equivocation
major term
genus
31. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
law of excluded middle
mixed hypothetical syllogism
major premise
32. If a statement is true - then it is true
ambiguous
law of identity
chronological snobbery
division
33. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
converse of a statement
apparent disagreement
exclusives
fallacy of distraction
34. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
major premise
division
complement of a term
subject
35. A sentence which is either true or false
statement
major premise
pure hypothetical syllogism
quantity
36. A hasty generalization
apriorism
fallacy of distraction
valid
minor term
37. Is valid and has true premises
law of Non-Contradiction
sound syllogism
informal fallacy
ad hominem
38. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
ambiguous
composition
tu quoque
fallacies of ambiguity
39. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
subcontrariety
schema
apparent disagreement
major term
40. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
non sequitur
quantity
consistant
ad hominem
41. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
ad populum
statement
formal logic
subimplication
42. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
apriorism
fallacy of accent
minor term
induction
43. The condition - the part following the 'if'
quantity
antecedent
tautology
contradiction
44. Found once in each premise
hypothetical
middle term
exclusives
intension
45. A tautology is a statement which is always true because of its logical structure
complex question
subimplication
enthymeme
tautology
46. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
superimplication
independance
intension
ipse dixit
47. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
apparent disagreement
mixed hypothetical syllogism
contradiction
tautology
48. Contains the minor term
formal logic
major term
self-contradiction
minor premise
49. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
post hoc ergo propter hoc
contradiction
fallacy of distraction
mood
50. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
middle term
informal fallacy
self-contradiction
minor term