SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
complex question
verbal disagreement
logic
extension
2. A hasty generalization
tu quoque
ad ignorantiam
bulverism
apriorism
3. A statement cannot be both true and false
induction
minor term
conclusion
law of Non-Contradiction
4. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
counterexample
minor premise
fallacy of distraction
minor term
5. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
square of oppisition
extension
supported statements
law of identity
6. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
non sequitur
ipse dixit
schema
quantity
7. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
amphiboly
non sequitur
law of excluded middle
supported statements
8. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
converse of a statement
disagreement
verbal disagreement
either/or
9. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
immediate reference
major term
inclusive
consistant
10. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
consistant
term
apriorism
pure hypothetical syllogism
11. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
contrapositive of a statement
contradiction
figure
consistant
12. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
consequent
induction
implication
independance
13. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
inclusive
induction
either/or
enthymeme
14. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
law of identity
contrapositive of a statement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
subcontrariety
15. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
schema
fallacy of distraction
subcontrariety
mixed hypothetical syllogism
16. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
law of excluded middle
conclusion
obverse of a statement
distributed term
17. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
minor premise
consistant
bulverism
law of Non-Contradiction
18. The science and art of reasoning well
implication
valid
logic
quantity
19. The sum of all the common attributes denoted by the term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
enthymeme
intension
exclusives
20. The condition - the part following the 'if'
antecedent
major term
ad ignorantiam
argument`
21. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
supported statements
fallacies of form
quantity
square of oppisition
22. A word is ambiguous if it has more than one possible meaning
enthymeme
chronological snobbery
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ambiguous
23. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
exclusives
antecedent
circular reasoning
subcontrariety
24. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
pure hypothetical syllogism
apriorism
conclusion
implication
25. A concept that can be expressed precisely
fallacy of distraction
subimplication
composition
term
26. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
ambiguous
equivocation
circular reasoning
extension
27. An illegitimate appeal to force
tautology
ad baculum
self-supporting statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
28. An illegimate appeal to authority
obverse of a statement
figure
ipse dixit
apriorism
29. The premise containing the major term
complex question
logic
major premise
circular reasoning
30. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
ad ignorantiam
genus
amphiboly
contrapositive of a statement
31. An argument from lack of evidence
consequent
subimplication
ad ignorantiam
apriorism
32. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
disagreement
minor premise
ad baculum
distributed term
33. Any statement is either true or false
complement of a term
self-contradiction
quantity
law of excluded middle
34. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
obverse of a statement
induction
middle term
either/or
35. Two statements are in contradiction if and only if they always have opposite truth values
independance
contradiction
obverse of a statement
fallacy of accent
36. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
real disagreement
tu quoque
complex question
categorical syllogism
37. If a statement is true - then it is true
obverse of a statement
law of identity
independance
bulverism
38. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
distributed term
categorical syllogism
superimplication
quantity
39. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
self-supporting statements
subcontrariety
converse of a statement
independance
40. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
verbal disagreement
contrapositive of a statement
subimplication
non sequitur
41. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
minor premise
minor term
tu quoque
logic
42. The set of all terms not included in the given term
law of Non-Contradiction
fallacy of distraction
independance
complement of a term
43. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
enthymeme
tautology
schema
categorical syllogism
44. Difference of opinion or perception
statement
apparent disagreement
either/or
mood
45. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
sound syllogism
consistant
subject
counterexample
46. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
real disagreement
post hoc ergo propter hoc
law of identity
either/or
47. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
ipse dixit
quantity
subject
amphiboly
48. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the falsity of the particular necessitates the falsity of the universal
formal logic
informal fallacy
superimplication
law of identity
49. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
fallacy of accent
argument`
hypothetical
subimplication
50. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
supported statements
exclusives
intension
inclusive