SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
major premise
figure
equivocation
fallacies of form
2. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
figure
self-supporting statements
quantity
subimplication
3. Points to an inconsistency between a person's argument and behavior
ad ignorantiam
schema
tu quoque
obverse of a statement
4. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
fallacies of ambiguity
independance
valid
exclusives
5. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
ad hominem
post hoc ergo propter hoc
valid
enthymeme
6. An illegitimate appeal to force
ad baculum
conclusion
implication
contrary
7. The predicate of the conclusion and is used in one premise
major term
counterexample
composition
complement of a term
8. If a statement is true - then it is true
figure
term
categorical syllogism
law of identity
9. Attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it
complex question
bulverism
informal fallacy
term
10. A concept that can be expressed precisely
independance
term
tu quoque
logic
11. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
law of identity
subimplication
obverse of a statement
ad hominem
12. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
equivocation
converse of a statement
fallacies of ambiguity
distributed term
13. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
categorical syllogism
pure hypothetical syllogism
immediate reference
either/or
14. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
superimplication
statement
subimplication
argument`
15. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
middle term
apparent disagreement
law of Non-Contradiction
fallacy of distraction
16. A hasty generalization
apriorism
exclusives
fallacies of form
genus
17. An illegimate appeal to authority
division
ipse dixit
law of Non-Contradiction
counterexample
18. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
argument`
contrapositive of a statement
ipse dixit
exclusives
19. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
ad hominem
hypothetical
induction
consequent
20. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
term
division
obverse of a statement
tu quoque
21. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
genus
informal fallacy
term
tu quoque
22. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
extension
middle term
supported statements
square of oppisition
23. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
fallacies of form
categorical syllogism
fallacy of accent
law of excluded middle
24. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
non sequitur
composition
apriorism
bulverism
25. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
circular reasoning
self-supporting statements
tautology
square of oppisition
26. A statement that reverses and negates both the subject and predicate of the original
counterexample
exclusives
law of Non-Contradiction
contrapositive of a statement
27. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
non sequitur
tautology
apriorism
law of Non-Contradiction
28. The subject of a statement is the term being described - or about which something is asserted
minor term
minor premise
hypothetical
subject
29. Is valid and has true premises
major premise
ambiguous
fallacies of form
sound syllogism
30. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
valid
middle term
tautology
logic
31. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
ad populum
fallacy of accent
quantity
formal logic
32. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
ad ignorantiam
consistant
minor term
subcontrariety
33. Found once in each premise
hypothetical
valid
middle term
bulverism
34. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
tautology
minor term
non sequitur
mixed hypothetical syllogism
35. Is a syllogism of the same form as the original - but with obviously true premises and false conclusion - in order to show the original to be invalid
counterexample
tu quoque
conclusion
either/or
36. The quantity of a statement is the scope of its claim about the extension of the subject: universal (entire extension) or particular (partial)
immediate reference
quantity
either/or
real disagreement
37. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
superimplication
contrapositive of a statement
immediate reference
genus
38. A sentence which is either true or false
complex question
complement of a term
statement
intension
39. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
tautology
fallacies of ambiguity
composition
valid
40. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
ipse dixit
consistant
circular reasoning
fallacies of ambiguity
41. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
informal fallacy
real disagreement
law of Non-Contradiction
tautology
42. A statement cannot be both true and false
ad baculum
pure hypothetical syllogism
schema
law of Non-Contradiction
43. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
counterexample
consequent
immediate reference
formal logic
44. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
argument`
subject
ad hominem
counterexample
45. The set of all terms not included in the given term
complement of a term
extension
statement
counterexample
46. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
distributed term
apriorism
minor term
subject
47. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
extension
verbal disagreement
disagreement
consistant
48. Making an argument based on a false dilemma
either/or
intension
antecedent
minor term
49. Improperly assuming that a sequence in time implies a cause and effect
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ad populum
division
real disagreement
50. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
sound syllogism
inclusive
converse of a statement
minor term