SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
subject
genus
subimplication
schema
2. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
consistant
converse of a statement
supported statements
statement
3. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
sound syllogism
mixed hypothetical syllogism
fallacy of distraction
statement
4. An illegimate appeal to authority
valid
contrary
ipse dixit
distributed term
5. An argument in which a statement is unstated and assumed. Specifically - it is a syllogism with one assumed statement
statement
conclusion
enthymeme
law of Non-Contradiction
6. A word - often a relative pronoun or adverb - that refers to a broad range of things or times
real disagreement
apriorism
inclusive
valid
7. Two statements are subcontraries if and only if both can be true but both cannot be false
pure hypothetical syllogism
subcontrariety
converse of a statement
mood
8. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
contrary
logic
non sequitur
square of oppisition
9. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
figure
minor term
square of oppisition
inclusive
10. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
fallacy of accent
circular reasoning
induction
self-contradiction
11. The set of all terms not included in the given term
composition
complement of a term
implication
tu quoque
12. Any statement is either true or false
subimplication
law of excluded middle
immediate reference
post hoc ergo propter hoc
13. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
disagreement
schema
subject
formal logic
14. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
converse of a statement
exclusives
enthymeme
genus
15. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
contrapositive of a statement
enthymeme
valid
immediate reference
16. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
pure hypothetical syllogism
extension
tautology
ad hominem
17. A verbal disagreement is a misunderstanding due to differing definitions to differing definitions for one or more words
verbal disagreement
schema
argument`
real disagreement
18. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
self-supporting statements
major term
minor term
post hoc ergo propter hoc
19. Found once in each premise
middle term
antecedent
valid
consistant
20. A self-contradiction is a statement that is false due to its logical structure
antecedent
conclusion
self-contradiction
equivocation
21. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
pure hypothetical syllogism
sound syllogism
exclusives
either/or
22. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
subimplication
implication
conclusion
ad baculum
23. A statement cannot be both true and false
minor term
law of Non-Contradiction
consequent
obverse of a statement
24. A genus of a term is a term that is more general - broad - or abstract than the original term and includes it
apriorism
independance
genus
counterexample
25. A concept that can be expressed precisely
term
law of Non-Contradiction
post hoc ergo propter hoc
circular reasoning
26. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacy of distraction
informal fallacy
fallacies of ambiguity
valid
27. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
obverse of a statement
law of identity
equivocation
disagreement
28. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
real disagreement
contrary
fallacy of accent
counterexample
29. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
figure
informal fallacy
valid
logical equivalence
30. The science and art of reasoning well
self-supporting statements
logic
logical equivalence
converse of a statement
31. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
ad hominem
consequent
ipse dixit
major term
32. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
apriorism
exclusives
argument`
ipse dixit
33. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
ipse dixit
major premise
law of excluded middle
conclusion
34. Arguments that confuse the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the conclusion
extension
apriorism
fallacy of distraction
term
35. The premise containing the major term
major premise
subimplication
non sequitur
law of identity
36. A question crafted to exclude any possible legitimate response
quantity
complex question
square of oppisition
subimplication
37. Difference of opinion or perception
bulverism
ad populum
apriorism
apparent disagreement
38. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
consistant
mood
self-supporting statements
major term
39. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
ad ignorantiam
fallacy of accent
supported statements
genus
40. Two statements are independant if the truth or falsity of one has no effect on the truth or falsity of the other
inclusive
independance
disagreement
subcontrariety
41. Contains the minor term
minor premise
law of Non-Contradiction
subcontrariety
inclusive
42. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
hypothetical
antecedent
implication
induction
43. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
division
consistant
antecedent
figure
44. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
converse of a statement
chronological snobbery
immediate reference
equivocation
45. A hasty generalization
apriorism
logical equivalence
complex question
composition
46. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
contradiction
extension
law of Non-Contradiction
categorical syllogism
47. The condition - the part following the 'if'
tautology
amphiboly
antecedent
ad baculum
48. Two statements are contrary if and only if they can both be false but cannot both be true
major premise
contrary
apparent disagreement
formal logic
49. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
equivocation
hypothetical
composition
bulverism
50. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
consequent
subimplication
law of excluded middle
composition