SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Introductory Logic Vocab
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The extention of a term is the sum of all the individual objects described by it
statement
extension
logic
induction
2. A statement that affirms an outcome based on a condition.
circular reasoning
tautology
hypothetical
law of identity
3. The result of the condition - the part after the 'then'
non sequitur
consequent
sound syllogism
intension
4. An argument that uses both hypothetical and categorical statements
mixed hypothetical syllogism
self-contradiction
conclusion
implication
5. A syllogism is valid if and only if the conclusion is necessarily true given that the premises are true
ad populum
extension
valid
law of excluded middle
6. A popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument
valid
informal fallacy
self-contradiction
tautology
7. A three letter description of the types of categorical statements it contains when arranged in stadard order
mood
self-contradiction
verbal disagreement
minor premise
8. If a statement is true - then it is true
law of excluded middle
minor premise
contrapositive of a statement
law of identity
9. Any statement is either true or false
law of excluded middle
non sequitur
disagreement
law of identity
10. An argument that uses only hypothetical statements
law of identity
pure hypothetical syllogism
intension
obverse of a statement
11. A statement cannot be both true and false
complement of a term
non sequitur
self-contradiction
law of Non-Contradiction
12. A statement of the opposite quality with a negated predicate
informal fallacy
argument`
obverse of a statement
tautology
13. A set of statements - one of which appears to be implied or supported by the others
minor premise
self-contradiction
argument`
bulverism
14. A term that - within a statement - refers to all members of its class
term
distributed term
fallacies of ambiguity
contrapositive of a statement
15. The science and art of reasoning well
fallacies of ambiguity
division
logic
major premise
16. The fallacy of transferring attributes from part to whole
composition
ipse dixit
verbal disagreement
subject
17. A vagueness of grammar that disguises or alters meaning
either/or
ad ignorantiam
implication
amphiboly
18. 'it does not follow'; that an argument is invalid
contradiction
minor term
non sequitur
complex question
19. An argument based merely on the passage of time
chronological snobbery
obverse of a statement
law of identity
enthymeme
20. A number from 1 to 4 identifying the placement of its middle term
self-contradiction
implication
figure
antecedent
21. An illegimate appeal to authority
disagreement
fallacies of form
ipse dixit
sound syllogism
22. A verbal attack on a person rather than his argument
ad hominem
law of Non-Contradiction
schema
tu quoque
23. Words that set boundaries - referring only to a limited class of things
formal logic
immediate reference
exclusives
amphiboly
24. Alters the meaning of a statement through changed emphasis
apriorism
fallacy of accent
apparent disagreement
real disagreement
25. Arguments that fail to establish their conclusions because of a weakness in logical structure
division
logic
fallacies of form
superimplication
26. An illegitimate appeal to a majority
complex question
extension
ad populum
sound syllogism
27. A real disagreement is an actual inconsistancy between two statements: they cannot both be true at the same time
exclusives
mixed hypothetical syllogism
law of identity
real disagreement
28. Two statements are logically equivalent if they imply one another
either/or
logical equivalence
valid
minor term
29. Deductive argument consisting of three statements in categorical form that together use only three terms - called the major - minor - and middle
disagreement
categorical syllogism
informal fallacy
hypothetical
30. The conclusion of an argument is the statement which appears to be implied by the other statements in the argument - which are called premises
extension
major premise
conclusion
ad populum
31. A statement that reverses the subject and predicate
ad populum
ad baculum
counterexample
converse of a statement
32. A diagram of the basic relationships between statements with the same subject and predicate
contrapositive of a statement
ad hominem
square of oppisition
tautology
33. The fallacy of transferring attributes from whole to part
division
statement
apparent disagreement
contrapositive of a statement
34. When there appears to be inconsistency - we have a disagreement
consistant
major premise
division
disagreement
35. Deals directly with the proper modes of reasoning
ipse dixit
formal logic
obverse of a statement
fallacies of ambiguity
36. A representation of a syllogism - having statements in standard order with standard abbreviations of its terms
minor term
ad ignorantiam
verbal disagreement
schema
37. A hasty generalization
apriorism
post hoc ergo propter hoc
ad ignorantiam
extension
38. Changing the definition of a term in the middle of an argument
equivocation
enthymeme
quantity
ambiguous
39. A supported statement is a statement whose truth value depends on evidence or information from outside itself
supported statements
disagreement
either/or
non sequitur
40. Secretly assuming what you are trying to prove
circular reasoning
subimplication
enthymeme
superimplication
41. Difference of opinion or perception
apparent disagreement
minor premise
inclusive
pure hypothetical syllogism
42. The subject of the conclusion and is used in the other premise
major term
contrary
figure
minor term
43. A statement which can be inferred directly from another statement
circular reasoning
implication
immediate reference
complement of a term
44. Is valid and has true premises
sound syllogism
circular reasoning
minor premise
post hoc ergo propter hoc
45. A self-supporting statement is a statement whose truth value can be determined from the statement itself
fallacy of accent
converse of a statement
self-supporting statements
immediate reference
46. Two statements are consistent if they can both be true at the same time
real disagreement
logical equivalence
consistant
ad populum
47. Reasoning with probability from examples or experience to general rules
induction
mixed hypothetical syllogism
ad baculum
amphiboly
48. Arguments that confuse the real issue with multiple - vague - or otherwise unclear meanings
fallacies of ambiguity
consequent
implication
chronological snobbery
49. Two statements are related by implication if the truth of one requires the truth of the other
equivocation
implication
contrapositive of a statement
ad baculum
50. The relationship between a universal and particular statement of the same quality - in which the truth of the universal necessitates the truth of the particular
verbal disagreement
subimplication
equivocation
minor premise