SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Weakening conditional reasoning
Conclusion definition
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Primary Objective #5
2. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Errors of composition and division
Logical opposites
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
3. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
2 roles played by assumptions
Causal statements
How to determine the strength of an argument
Appeal Fallacies
4. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Primary Objective #9
Family #3: Hurt
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
5. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
Premise definition
2 speaker questions
Errors of conditional reasoning
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
6. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Errors of conditional reasoning
Counter Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #7
7. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Straw Man
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
8. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Primary Objective #1
2 speaker questions
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
9. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Errors of composition and division
Method of Reasoning
Primary Objective #6
10. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Sufficient Condition
11. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Central assumption of causal conclusions
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
How to strengthen an argument
2 speaker questions
12. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Justify the conclusion formula
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Mistaken Negation
13. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Family #1: Prove
Conclusion Indicators
14. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Premise Indicators
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Errors of composition and division
15. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Family #2: Help
Time shift errors
Conclusion Identification Method
16. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
17. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Common weakening scenarios
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Mistaken Reversal
18. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Common weakening scenarios
Source argument AKA ad hominen
False dilemma
19. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
How to strengthen an argument
Conclusion definition
Errors of conditional reasoning
20. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Sufficient Condition
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
21. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Family #2: Help
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Primary Objective #5
How to strengthen an argument
22. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Numbers and percentage errors
Necessary Condition
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Method of Reasoning questions
23. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
Primary Objective #3
Errors in the use of evidence
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
24. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance. because the LSAT is concerned solely with argument forms - a speaker can never validly attack the character or motives or a person; instead - a speaker
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Assumption Negation Technique
Quantity indicators
25. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Typical assumption question stems
Justify the conclusion formula
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Family #4: Disprove
26. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Necessary Condition
Premise definition
27. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Rules for Family #1
Typical assumption question stems
Rules for Family #2
28. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
How to strengthen an argument
Premise definition
Necessary Condition
29. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Quantity indicators
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Exceptional case/over generalization
30. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Primary Objective #4
Mistaken cause and effect
Logical negation
31. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Primary Objective #2
Logical negation
Logical opposites
Appeal Fallacies
32. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Primary Objective #7
Numbers and percentage errors
Rules for Family #1
33. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Assumption Negation Technique
Straw Man
Circular reasoning
False analogy
34. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
How to attack a causal conclusion
Primary Objective #6
Logical opposites
Family #4: Disprove
35. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
Uncertain use of a term or concept
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Survey errors
36. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Primary Objective #8
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Premise Indicators
37. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Premise Indicators
Time shift errors
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
38. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Uncertain use of a term or concept
39. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Method of Reasoning questions
Appeal Fallacies
Rules for Family #2
Family #4: Disprove
40. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
Main Point Questions
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Survey errors
41. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Assumption Negation Technique
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Mistaken Negation
42. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
Premise definition
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
False analogy
Primary Objective #9
43. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
44. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Rules for Family #3
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
45. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Straw Man
Sufficient Condition
Family #2: Help
Errors of composition and division
46. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
47. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Typical assumption question stems
How to determine the strength of an argument
Time shift errors
48. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Numbers and percentage errors
Mistaken Reversal
49. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Method of Reasoning questions
Causal statements
Assumption Negation Technique
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
50. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Quantity indicators
Common weakening scenarios
Primary Objective #8