SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Counter Premise Indicators
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Primary Objective #2
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
2. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Common weakening scenarios
2 roles played by assumptions
3. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Mistaken cause and effect
Uncertain use of a term or concept
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
4. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
How to strengthen an argument
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Mistaken Reversal
5. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
False analogy
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
6. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Premise Indicators
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Causal statements
7. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Necessary Condition
Primary Objective #5
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Quantity indicators
8. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
How to strengthen an argument
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Primary Objective #7
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
9. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
10. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Conclusion definition
Main Point Questions
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
11. Always ask: Do the given facts support the conclusion? Do the premises strongly suggest that the conclusion would be true? Does the conclusion feel like an inevitable result of the premises? Or Does the conclusion go beyond the scope of the info in t
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
How to determine the strength of an argument
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #9
12. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Sufficient Condition
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Errors of composition and division
13. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
14. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
Mistaken Negation
Logical negation
Rules for Family #3
False analogy
15. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Conclusion Indicators
Time shift errors
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
16. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Errors of conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #3
Premise Indicators
17. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Primary Objective #9
Mistaken Reversal
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Primary Objective #3
18. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Primary Objective #1
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Appeal Fallacies
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
19. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Logical opposites
Survey errors
Common weakening scenarios
Primary Objective #8
20. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Method of Reasoning
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Mistaken cause and effect
Necessary Condition
21. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Mistaken cause and effect
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Probability indicators
22. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
2 roles played by assumptions
Justify the conclusion formula
False analogy
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
23. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Probability indicators
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Primary Objective #6
24. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Exceptional case/over generalization
Circular reasoning
2 speaker questions
25. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Primary Objective #3
Primary Objective #2
Time shift errors
26. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Appeal Fallacies
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Circular reasoning
Conclusion definition
27. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Rules for Family #1
Justify the conclusion formula
Premise definition
28. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Primary Objective #3
Assumption Negation Technique
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Primary Objective #1
29. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Primary Objective #2
Primary Objective #9
Family #4: Disprove
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
30. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Primary Objective #1
Conclusion Identification Method
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Typical assumption question stems
31. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Straw Man
Errors in the use of evidence
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Family #1: Prove
32. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Straw Man
Family #1: Prove
33. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
False dilemma
Family #2: Help
Circular reasoning
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
34. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Justify the conclusion formula
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
False analogy
35. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Primary Objective #8
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Sufficient Condition
Family #1: Prove
36. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Time shift errors
Causal statements
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Weaken question signal words
37. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
False analogy
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Primary Objective #6
'Additional' Premise Indicators
38. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
How to attack a causal conclusion
Rules for Family #1
Rules for Family #3
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
39. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
False dilemma
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Causal statements
40. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Mistaken cause and effect
False analogy
'Additional' Premise Indicators
41. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Rules for Family #1
How to determine the strength of an argument
Appeal Fallacies
Numbers and percentage errors
42. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
2 roles played by assumptions
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
43. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Errors in the use of evidence
How to determine the strength of an argument
Rules for Family #2
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
44. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Mistaken Negation
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Primary Objective #8
45. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Method of Reasoning questions
46. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
Counter Premise Indicators
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Circular reasoning
2 speaker questions
47. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Premise definition
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Family #4: Disprove
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
48. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
Conclusion Indicators
Primary Objective #7
Assumption Negation Technique
Logical negation
49. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Straw Man
Quantity indicators
2 roles played by assumptions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
50. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Errors of conditional reasoning