SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
Circular reasoning
Premise Indicators
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
2. 1. if you recognize the form of reasoning used in the stimulus (causal - conditional - etc.) immediately attack the answers and search for the answer with similar reasoning (analogy - circular reasoning) 2. The Conclusion - match the conclusions - to
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Primary Objective #7
3. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
4. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Exceptional case/over generalization
Rules for Family #1
5. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Logical opposites
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Rules for Family #2
6. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Errors of composition and division
Primary Objective #5
7. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Primary Objective #4
Appeal Fallacies
How to determine the strength of an argument
8. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Conclusion Indicators
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Conclusion definition
9. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Rules for Family #2
How to strengthen an argument
Sufficient Condition
10. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Errors of conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #8
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
11. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Assumption Negation Technique
Errors of composition and division
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
12. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Numbers and percentage errors
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Primary Objective #9
13. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Primary Objective #4
14. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Weakening conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #5
15. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Assumption Negation Technique
Weaken question signal words
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
16. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
Errors of conditional reasoning
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Rules for Family #3
Typical assumption question stems
17. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Main Point Questions
Rules for Family #1
Conclusion Identification Method
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
18. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Weakening conditional reasoning
Logical negation
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
19. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Common weakening scenarios
Errors of conditional reasoning
20. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Time shift errors
How to strengthen an argument
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Logical opposites
21. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Mistaken Negation
Method of Reasoning
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Conclusion Indicators
22. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Errors in the use of evidence
Time shift errors
Uncertain use of a term or concept
23. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
Mistaken Reversal
Exceptional case/over generalization
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Source argument AKA ad hominen
24. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Rules for Family #3
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Family #2: Help
25. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Errors of conditional reasoning
Logical opposites
Family #1: Prove
Method of Reasoning questions
26. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
False dilemma
Primary Objective #8
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
27. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Family #2: Help
Mistaken cause and effect
28. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Causal statements
Rules for Family #3
Primary Objective #7
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
29. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Primary Objective #5
How to strengthen an argument
Family #2: Help
Straw Man
30. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Typical assumption question stems
Primary Objective #7
Primary Objective #1
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
31. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Time shift errors
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
How to attack a causal conclusion
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
32. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Primary Objective #4
Sufficient Condition
Conclusion Indicators
Method of Reasoning
33. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Causal statements
Survey errors
Time shift errors
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
34. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Premise Indicators
Method of Reasoning questions
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Primary Objective #3
35. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
Primary Objective #9
Rules for Family #3
How to strengthen an argument
Primary Objective #8
36. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Justify the conclusion formula
Rules for Family #1
How to attack a causal conclusion
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
37. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Conclusion definition
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Mistaken Negation
Causal statements
38. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Weaken question signal words
False dilemma
Mistaken cause and effect
Circular reasoning
39. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Family #4: Disprove
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
40. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #2
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Family #3: Hurt
41. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #7
Method of Reasoning
42. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Typical assumption question stems
43. Supporter - the traditional linking role - where an assumption connects pieces of the argument. (often new or rogue pieces) They also can close gaps. Ex: All male citizens of athens had the right to vote. Therefore - Socrates had the right to vote in
2 roles played by assumptions
Rules for Family #2
Exceptional case/over generalization
Primary Objective #6
44. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Numbers and percentage errors
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Main Point Questions
45. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Primary Objective #6
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Primary Objective #4
Probability indicators
46. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Family #4: Disprove
False dilemma
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
2 speaker questions
47. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Rules for Family #3
Survey errors
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Primary Objective #3
48. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
Mistaken cause and effect
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
2 speaker questions
Typical assumption question stems
49. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
50. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Counter Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #4
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Family #3: Hurt
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests