SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Straw Man
Errors of conditional reasoning
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
2. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Counter Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #5
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
3. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
False analogy
How to strengthen an argument
Appeal Fallacies
Family #3: Hurt
4. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Typical assumption question stems
How to strengthen an argument
Rules for Family #2
5. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance. because the LSAT is concerned solely with argument forms - a speaker can never validly attack the character or motives or a person; instead - a speaker
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Circular reasoning
Family #3: Hurt
6. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
Justify the conclusion formula
Numbers and percentage errors
Weaken question signal words
Quantity indicators
7. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Sufficient Condition
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Quantity indicators
Counter Premise Indicators
8. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Weakening conditional reasoning
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Family #1: Prove
9. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Assumption Negation Technique
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Time shift errors
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
10. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Family #4: Disprove
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Family #2: Help
Logical opposites
11. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Straw Man
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
12. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Mistaken cause and effect
13. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
14. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Exceptional case/over generalization
Assumption Negation Technique
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Justify the conclusion formula
15. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Family #2: Help
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
How to strengthen an argument
Errors of conditional reasoning
16. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Common weakening scenarios
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
17. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Primary Objective #2
Premise Indicators
18. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
Primary Objective #9
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
False analogy
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
19. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #7
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Premise Indicators
20. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
21. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Conclusion Identification Method
Family #1: Prove
Method of Reasoning questions
Method of Reasoning
22. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Primary Objective #2
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Survey errors
23. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
24. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
Rules for Family #3
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Errors in the use of evidence
25. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
2 speaker questions
Rules for Family #2
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Causal statements
26. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Mistaken Reversal
Mistaken Negation
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Time shift errors
27. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Conclusion Indicators
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
How to attack a causal conclusion
28. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Typical assumption question stems
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Conclusion definition
Primary Objective #7
29. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Exceptional case/over generalization
Family #4: Disprove
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Probability indicators
30. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Necessary Condition
Errors of conditional reasoning
Exceptional case/over generalization
31. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Primary Objective #1
Primary Objective #8
2 speaker questions
Primary Objective #2
32. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Main Point Questions
Typical assumption question stems
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
33. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
Logical opposites
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
34. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
False analogy
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Probability indicators
Premise definition
35. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Errors of composition and division
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Premise Indicators
Logical negation
36. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Method of Reasoning questions
Justify the conclusion formula
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
37. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Rules for Family #2
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Rules for Family #1
38. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Rules for Family #2
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Mistaken Reversal
39. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Weakening conditional reasoning
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Time shift errors
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
40. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Errors of composition and division
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
41. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Premise Indicators
Method of Reasoning
42. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Primary Objective #2
43. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Assumption Negation Technique
Primary Objective #6
44. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Primary Objective #7
Common weakening scenarios
Rules for Family #2
Counter Premise Indicators
45. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Primary Objective #5
Errors of conditional reasoning
Rules for Family #2
Method of Reasoning
46. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Survey errors
47. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Time shift errors
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Assumption Negation Technique
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
48. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Primary Objective #1
Errors of conditional reasoning
Probability indicators
Primary Objective #5
49. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Survey errors
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Conclusion Identification Method
50. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
How to strengthen an argument
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories