SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Primary Objective #7
Logical opposites
Method of Reasoning questions
Time shift errors
2. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Rules for Family #1
Errors of composition and division
Primary Objective #9
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
3. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
False dilemma
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Rules for Family #3
4. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
5. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Logical opposites
Weaken question signal words
6. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Weakening conditional reasoning
Necessary Condition
How to determine the strength of an argument
7. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
Weaken question signal words
Conclusion Indicators
Exceptional case/over generalization
2 speaker questions
8. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Rules for Family #3
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Survey errors
9. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Rules for Family #3
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Exceptional case/over generalization
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
10. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Errors of composition and division
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Straw Man
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
11. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Premise Indicators
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Primary Objective #1
How to determine the strength of an argument
12. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Assumption Negation Technique
Family #3: Hurt
Mistaken Negation
Conclusion definition
13. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Errors of composition and division
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Straw Man
14. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Straw Man
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Primary Objective #9
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
15. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Quantity indicators
Primary Objective #1
Causal statements
Circular reasoning
16. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Rules for Family #2
Necessary Condition
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
17. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Family #3: Hurt
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Errors of conditional reasoning
Circular reasoning
18. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Primary Objective #7
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
19. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Straw Man
Numbers and percentage errors
False analogy
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
20. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Main Point Questions
Method of Reasoning
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
21. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
How to strengthen an argument
Premise Indicators
22. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Premise definition
Family #3: Hurt
Primary Objective #8
Errors in the use of evidence
23. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
Conclusion Identification Method
Quantity indicators
Rules for Family #3
How to attack a causal conclusion
24. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Counter Premise Indicators
Errors of composition and division
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Family #2: Help
25. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Conclusion Indicators
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Circular reasoning
26. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Mistaken cause and effect
Premise definition
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Sufficient Condition
27. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
28. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Justify the conclusion formula
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Mistaken cause and effect
Family #4: Disprove
29. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Primary Objective #8
Typical assumption question stems
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Probability indicators
30. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Primary Objective #1
Primary Objective #2
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Rules for Family #3
31. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Family #3: Hurt
False analogy
32. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Weakening conditional reasoning
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Mistaken Reversal
Central assumption of causal conclusions
33. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Conclusion definition
Exceptional case/over generalization
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
34. To weaken a conditional conclusion - attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order for the sufficient condition to occur. With a combo of a conditional reasoning stimulus and a weaken question
Conclusion definition
Weakening conditional reasoning
2 roles played by assumptions
Primary Objective #5
35. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Conclusion Indicators
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Primary Objective #2
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
36. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Primary Objective #7
Primary Objective #4
Numbers and percentage errors
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
37. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Primary Objective #6
Logical negation
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
38. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Method of Reasoning questions
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Primary Objective #9
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
39. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Family #4: Disprove
How to strengthen an argument
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
False analogy
40. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Family #4: Disprove
Weaken question signal words
Probability indicators
Family #1: Prove
41. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Uncertain use of a term or concept
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Rules for Family #1
Logical opposites
42. Always ask: Do the given facts support the conclusion? Do the premises strongly suggest that the conclusion would be true? Does the conclusion feel like an inevitable result of the premises? Or Does the conclusion go beyond the scope of the info in t
How to determine the strength of an argument
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Family #4: Disprove
43. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Survey errors
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
44. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
45. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Logical opposites
Conclusion Identification Method
Logical negation
Sufficient Condition
46. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
2 speaker questions
Primary Objective #5
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
'Additional' Premise Indicators
47. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Main Point Questions
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Rules for Family #3
Assumption Negation Technique
48. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
Family #1: Prove
Assumption Negation Technique
Rules for Family #1
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
49. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Assumption Negation Technique
Errors of conditional reasoning
Mistaken Reversal
Primary Objective #4
50. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Primary Objective #2
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
False dilemma