SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Typical assumption question stems
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
2. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Logical negation
Justify the conclusion formula
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
False dilemma
3. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Time shift errors
Causal statements
Exceptional case/over generalization
4. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Family #2: Help
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
5. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Time shift errors
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Errors of conditional reasoning
2 roles played by assumptions
6. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
How to attack a causal conclusion
2 roles played by assumptions
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
7. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Primary Objective #8
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Conclusion Identification Method
Straw Man
8. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Counter Premise Indicators
Family #3: Hurt
Rules for Family #3
9. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Errors of composition and division
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Conclusion definition
Mistaken cause and effect
10. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #1
Assumption Negation Technique
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
11. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
12. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Counter Premise Indicators
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Method of Reasoning
Primary Objective #2
13. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Counter Premise Indicators
Typical assumption question stems
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
14. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
How to attack a causal conclusion
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
How to strengthen an argument
15. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Logical negation
Conclusion Identification Method
Necessary Condition
Primary Objective #2
16. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Family #2: Help
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Primary Objective #2
17. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Family #2: Help
Survey errors
Family #3: Hurt
Assumption Negation Technique
18. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
False dilemma
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Primary Objective #3
How to strengthen an argument
19. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Appeal Fallacies
Primary Objective #5
Conclusion Indicators
Mistaken Negation
20. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Appeal Fallacies
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Conclusion Identification Method
Rules for Family #1
21. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Quantity indicators
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
22. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Logical opposites
Uncertain use of a term or concept
23. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Quantity indicators
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
24. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Straw Man
Probability indicators
Primary Objective #6
How to attack a causal conclusion
25. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
2 roles played by assumptions
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Conclusion Indicators
26. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Causal statements
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
27. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Primary Objective #6
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #1
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
28. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
Primary Objective #2
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Quantity indicators
Rules for Family #2
29. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Mistaken Reversal
Family #3: Hurt
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Numbers and percentage errors
30. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
Mistaken Negation
Errors in the use of evidence
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Source argument AKA ad hominen
31. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Rules for Family #2
Source argument AKA ad hominen
32. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
False dilemma
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Family #2: Help
Errors of conditional reasoning
33. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Errors of conditional reasoning
Conclusion definition
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
34. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance. because the LSAT is concerned solely with argument forms - a speaker can never validly attack the character or motives or a person; instead - a speaker
'Additional' Premise Indicators
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Family #3: Hurt
35. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
False dilemma
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Primary Objective #6
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
36. 1. if you recognize the form of reasoning used in the stimulus (causal - conditional - etc.) immediately attack the answers and search for the answer with similar reasoning (analogy - circular reasoning) 2. The Conclusion - match the conclusions - to
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Primary Objective #5
Time shift errors
37. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Quantity indicators
Counter Premise Indicators
38. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Errors of composition and division
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Family #4: Disprove
39. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Errors in the use of evidence
40. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Method of Reasoning
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Errors of composition and division
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
41. Supporter - the traditional linking role - where an assumption connects pieces of the argument. (often new or rogue pieces) They also can close gaps. Ex: All male citizens of athens had the right to vote. Therefore - Socrates had the right to vote in
How to strengthen an argument
Numbers and percentage errors
Uncertain use of a term or concept
2 roles played by assumptions
42. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
False dilemma
Method of Reasoning questions
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Circular reasoning
43. 1. Incomplete info. The author fails to consider all of the possibilities or relies upon evidence that is incomplete. This flaw can be attacked by bringing up new possibilities or info. 2. Improper comparison. The author attempts to compare two or mo
Quantity indicators
Logical negation
Assumption Negation Technique
Common weakening scenarios
44. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Conclusion definition
Rules for Family #3
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
45. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Rules for Family #1
46. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Probability indicators
Primary Objective #3
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
47. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Premise definition
How to determine the strength of an argument
How to attack a causal conclusion
Main Point Questions
48. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Necessary Condition
Conclusion definition
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
49. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
Primary Objective #6
Mistaken Negation
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Primary Objective #8
50. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
Typical assumption question stems
Conclusion definition
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?