SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Numbers and percentage errors
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Rules for Family #2
2. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Primary Objective #2
Method of Reasoning questions
3. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
Mistaken Reversal
Rules for Family #3
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Appeal Fallacies
4. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Weakening conditional reasoning
Main Point Questions
Assumption Negation Technique
Premise Indicators
5. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Conclusion definition
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
6. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Causal statements
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
7. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Rules for Family #2
Family #4: Disprove
Errors in the use of evidence
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
8. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
9. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Causal statements
Logical negation
Numbers and percentage errors
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
10. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Rules for Family #1
Sufficient Condition
'Additional' Premise Indicators
11. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Exceptional case/over generalization
Family #1: Prove
Mistaken Negation
12. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Errors in the use of evidence
Main Point Questions
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
13. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
Survey errors
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Mistaken Negation
14. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Errors in the use of evidence
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Errors of composition and division
Mistaken Negation
15. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
Primary Objective #1
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Premise definition
Conclusion Indicators
16. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Logical negation
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Errors of conditional reasoning
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
17. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
Quantity indicators
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
18. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
Rules for Family #1
Rules for Family #3
Survey errors
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
19. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Logical opposites
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
20. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Errors of composition and division
Conclusion Identification Method
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
21. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Family #2: Help
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Premise definition
22. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Survey errors
Time shift errors
Primary Objective #1
23. 1. if you recognize the form of reasoning used in the stimulus (causal - conditional - etc.) immediately attack the answers and search for the answer with similar reasoning (analogy - circular reasoning) 2. The Conclusion - match the conclusions - to
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
24. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Probability indicators
Rules for Family #1
Family #3: Hurt
Primary Objective #7
25. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Conclusion Identification Method
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Primary Objective #5
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
26. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
Conclusion Indicators
Logical opposites
Uncertain use of a term or concept
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
27. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Justify the conclusion formula
'Additional' Premise Indicators
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Common weakening scenarios
28. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Family #1: Prove
Rules for Family #3
Family #2: Help
29. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Mistaken cause and effect
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Weaken question signal words
Primary Objective #6
30. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Logical negation
Primary Objective #2
31. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Primary Objective #9
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #8
32. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
How to attack a causal conclusion
Primary Objective #8
Main Point Questions
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
33. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Logical opposites
Time shift errors
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Mistaken cause and effect
34. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Numbers and percentage errors
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Sufficient Condition
35. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
Primary Objective #4
2 speaker questions
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
36. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Method of Reasoning
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Survey errors
37. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Appeal Fallacies
Uncertain use of a term or concept
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Main Point Questions
38. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Assumption Negation Technique
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Survey errors
Counter Premise Indicators
39. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Family #3: Hurt
40. At least on of the two - possibly both.
41. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Common weakening scenarios
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Probability indicators
42. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Weakening conditional reasoning
Time shift errors
2 roles played by assumptions
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
43. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Exceptional case/over generalization
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #9
44. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Method of Reasoning
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
45. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Appeal Fallacies
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Errors in the use of evidence
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
46. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Circular reasoning
False dilemma
47. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Straw Man
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Mistaken Negation
48. 1. Incomplete info. The author fails to consider all of the possibilities or relies upon evidence that is incomplete. This flaw can be attacked by bringing up new possibilities or info. 2. Improper comparison. The author attempts to compare two or mo
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Primary Objective #6
Common weakening scenarios
How to determine the strength of an argument
49. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Primary Objective #8
False dilemma
Errors of conditional reasoning
Assumption Negation Technique
50. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Sufficient Condition
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions