SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
Rules for Family #3
Primary Objective #7
Premise definition
How to strengthen an argument
2. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Numbers and percentage errors
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Common weakening scenarios
3. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
Mistaken Reversal
False analogy
Method of Reasoning questions
Justify the conclusion formula
4. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Appeal Fallacies
Mistaken Negation
Primary Objective #1
Rules for Family #3
5. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
2 speaker questions
Premise definition
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
6. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
7. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
2 speaker questions
Appeal Fallacies
Assumption Negation Technique
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
8. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Appeal Fallacies
Main Point Questions
Rules for Family #3
Primary Objective #1
9. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
'Additional' Premise Indicators
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Counter Premise Indicators
Logical opposites
10. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Rules for Family #2
Mistaken Negation
Causal statements
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
11. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Numbers and percentage errors
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
12. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Method of Reasoning questions
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
13. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Mistaken Negation
Family #3: Hurt
Appeal Fallacies
14. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Family #2: Help
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
15. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
2 speaker questions
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Weakening conditional reasoning
16. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Probability indicators
Sufficient Condition
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Mistaken Reversal
17. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Errors of composition and division
Probability indicators
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Primary Objective #9
18. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Family #3: Hurt
Conclusion Indicators
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
19. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Survey errors
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Counter Premise Indicators
False dilemma
20. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Probability indicators
Conclusion Indicators
Primary Objective #2
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
21. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Method of Reasoning
Conclusion definition
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
22. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Logical opposites
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Errors of conditional reasoning
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
23. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Method of Reasoning
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Assumption Negation Technique
24. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Family #4: Disprove
Logical negation
Weaken question signal words
25. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Quantity indicators
Primary Objective #1
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
26. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Assumption Negation Technique
How to strengthen an argument
Logical opposites
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
27. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Straw Man
Primary Objective #7
Mistaken cause and effect
Exceptional case/over generalization
28. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Weaken question signal words
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Primary Objective #3
29. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Primary Objective #3
Probability indicators
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
30. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
How to attack a causal conclusion
Appeal Fallacies
Family #1: Prove
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
31. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Primary Objective #4
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Conclusion Identification Method
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
32. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
False dilemma
How to strengthen an argument
Family #3: Hurt
33. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Conclusion Identification Method
Assumption Negation Technique
34. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Premise Indicators
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
35. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Rules for Family #1
Family #1: Prove
36. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Primary Objective #3
Weaken question signal words
Necessary Condition
Time shift errors
37. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Primary Objective #4
False analogy
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
38. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Premise definition
Main Point Questions
Numbers and percentage errors
Family #1: Prove
39. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Appeal Fallacies
Circular reasoning
Causal statements
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
40. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Premise definition
Survey errors
Typical assumption question stems
Logical negation
41. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Primary Objective #1
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Mistaken cause and effect
Mistaken Reversal
42. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
2 roles played by assumptions
Primary Objective #6
43. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Quantity indicators
False dilemma
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Time shift errors
44. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Conclusion definition
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Necessary Condition
45. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
46. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Errors of conditional reasoning
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Uncertain use of a term or concept
47. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Primary Objective #8
Circular reasoning
Primary Objective #5
48. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Method of Reasoning
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Primary Objective #2
49. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Necessary Condition
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Quantity indicators
50. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Primary Objective #8
Central assumption of causal conclusions
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions