SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Sufficient Condition
2 speaker questions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
2. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Weakening conditional reasoning
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Conclusion Identification Method
Premise Indicators
3. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Method of Reasoning
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
4. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Conclusion definition
Time shift errors
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
5. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Assumption Negation Technique
Justify the conclusion formula
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
6. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
How to strengthen an argument
Primary Objective #4
Conclusion Indicators
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
7. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
8. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Common weakening scenarios
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Family #2: Help
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
9. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Premise definition
False dilemma
Primary Objective #2
10. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
Method of Reasoning questions
'Additional' Premise Indicators
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
11. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Typical assumption question stems
Errors in the use of evidence
Rules for Family #1
Numbers and percentage errors
12. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Primary Objective #1
13. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Primary Objective #1
Method of Reasoning questions
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
14. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Errors in the use of evidence
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Logical opposites
Rules for Family #1
15. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance. because the LSAT is concerned solely with argument forms - a speaker can never validly attack the character or motives or a person; instead - a speaker
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Mistaken Reversal
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
16. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Primary Objective #9
Weakening conditional reasoning
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
'Additional' Premise Indicators
17. 1. Incomplete info. The author fails to consider all of the possibilities or relies upon evidence that is incomplete. This flaw can be attacked by bringing up new possibilities or info. 2. Improper comparison. The author attempts to compare two or mo
Quantity indicators
Common weakening scenarios
Sufficient Condition
Mistaken Reversal
18. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Errors of composition and division
Central assumption of causal conclusions
19. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
Causal statements
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Mistaken cause and effect
Exceptional case/over generalization
20. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
Circular reasoning
How to attack a causal conclusion
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Main Point Questions
21. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
False dilemma
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
22. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Weaken question signal words
Rules for Family #2
Central assumption of causal conclusions
23. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
Conclusion Indicators
Mistaken cause and effect
Rules for Family #3
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
24. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Rules for Family #1
Family #3: Hurt
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Primary Objective #8
25. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Probability indicators
Mistaken Reversal
Conclusion Identification Method
26. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #3
27. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Primary Objective #7
28. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Rules for Family #3
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
29. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Justify the conclusion formula
Primary Objective #5
Method of Reasoning questions
30. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Primary Objective #5
Conclusion Indicators
Typical assumption question stems
Main Point Questions
31. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Probability indicators
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Errors of conditional reasoning
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
32. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Primary Objective #7
Necessary Condition
Primary Objective #6
33. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Time shift errors
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
How to determine the strength of an argument
34. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Errors of conditional reasoning
Premise definition
Necessary Condition
35. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
Rules for Family #2
Primary Objective #8
How to attack a causal conclusion
Central assumption of causal conclusions
36. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Errors in the use of evidence
Method of Reasoning questions
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Appeal Fallacies
37. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
False dilemma
Mistaken Negation
Premise definition
Conclusion Identification Method
38. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Exceptional case/over generalization
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
39. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Family #4: Disprove
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Primary Objective #6
40. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Weaken question signal words
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Mistaken cause and effect
Rules for Family #1
41. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Method of Reasoning
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
42. 1. if you recognize the form of reasoning used in the stimulus (causal - conditional - etc.) immediately attack the answers and search for the answer with similar reasoning (analogy - circular reasoning) 2. The Conclusion - match the conclusions - to
How to attack a causal conclusion
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Primary Objective #4
43. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Weaken question signal words
Rules for Family #1
Logical negation
Uncertain use of a term or concept
44. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Primary Objective #3
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
45. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Primary Objective #7
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
46. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Conclusion definition
Assumption Negation Technique
2 roles played by assumptions
Straw Man
47. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Primary Objective #1
Primary Objective #8
48. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Rules for Family #1
Primary Objective #6
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
49. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Justify the conclusion formula
False dilemma
Errors of composition and division
Numbers and percentage errors
50. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Family #3: Hurt
Survey errors
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions