SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Logical negation
Mistaken Reversal
Family #1: Prove
Rules for Family #2
2. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance. because the LSAT is concerned solely with argument forms - a speaker can never validly attack the character or motives or a person; instead - a speaker
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Family #4: Disprove
3. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #9
Time shift errors
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
4. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Survey errors
Straw Man
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
5. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
Necessary Condition
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
How to attack a causal conclusion
6. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Primary Objective #6
Primary Objective #7
Family #3: Hurt
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
7. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Logical opposites
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
8. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Time shift errors
Mistaken Negation
Primary Objective #3
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
9. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Logical opposites
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Rules for Family #1
Primary Objective #3
10. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Logical negation
How to strengthen an argument
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
11. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
How to attack a causal conclusion
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #6
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
12. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Rules for Family #1
Causal statements
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
13. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Typical assumption question stems
2 speaker questions
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Errors of conditional reasoning
14. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Rules for Family #3
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
15. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Weaken question signal words
Main Point Questions
False analogy
16. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Primary Objective #7
Numbers and percentage errors
Mistaken cause and effect
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
17. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Counter Premise Indicators
18. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Weakening conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #1
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Primary Objective #3
19. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Conclusion Identification Method
Family #4: Disprove
Quantity indicators
Mistaken cause and effect
20. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Assumption Negation Technique
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
21. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Method of Reasoning questions
Typical assumption question stems
Causal statements
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
22. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Family #4: Disprove
Primary Objective #5
Quantity indicators
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
23. To weaken a conditional conclusion - attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order for the sufficient condition to occur. With a combo of a conditional reasoning stimulus and a weaken question
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Weakening conditional reasoning
How to determine the strength of an argument
24. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Premise Indicators
Family #3: Hurt
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
25. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Primary Objective #8
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
26. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Sufficient Condition
Family #3: Hurt
Justify the conclusion formula
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
27. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Primary Objective #5
Survey errors
Conclusion Indicators
28. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Numbers and percentage errors
False dilemma
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
29. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
30. 1. if you recognize the form of reasoning used in the stimulus (causal - conditional - etc.) immediately attack the answers and search for the answer with similar reasoning (analogy - circular reasoning) 2. The Conclusion - match the conclusions - to
Conclusion definition
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Appeal Fallacies
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
31. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Conclusion Identification Method
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Main Point Questions
Logical negation
32. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Premise definition
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Premise Indicators
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
33. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Justify the conclusion formula
Primary Objective #5
Appeal Fallacies
Conclusion Indicators
34. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Primary Objective #2
How to attack a causal conclusion
Primary Objective #7
35. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Errors of conditional reasoning
Circular reasoning
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Logical negation
36. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Family #1: Prove
Primary Objective #3
2 roles played by assumptions
37. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Primary Objective #7
How to determine the strength of an argument
Numbers and percentage errors
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
38. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
Survey errors
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Justify the conclusion formula
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
39. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Quantity indicators
Primary Objective #7
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Family #3: Hurt
40. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Family #3: Hurt
Method of Reasoning
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
41. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
False dilemma
How to determine the strength of an argument
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
42. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Premise Indicators
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
43. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Conclusion Identification Method
Sufficient Condition
Weakening conditional reasoning
Counter Premise Indicators
44. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Time shift errors
Primary Objective #9
2 speaker questions
Primary Objective #7
45. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Logical opposites
2 roles played by assumptions
Primary Objective #2
46. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Errors of conditional reasoning
False dilemma
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
False analogy
47. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
48. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Exceptional case/over generalization
Probability indicators
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
49. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Rules for Family #2
Main Point Questions
Typical assumption question stems
Logical opposites
50. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Primary Objective #7
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?