SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Primary Objective #6
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Primary Objective #5
2. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Logical negation
Family #1: Prove
Primary Objective #9
3. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
Exceptional case/over generalization
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Errors of conditional reasoning
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
4. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Primary Objective #5
Mistaken Negation
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Circular reasoning
5. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
Mistaken Negation
Straw Man
Weaken question signal words
Family #4: Disprove
6. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
Straw Man
Common weakening scenarios
Conclusion definition
Errors in the use of evidence
7. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
False analogy
Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #4
8. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Rules for Family #2
Assumption Negation Technique
Primary Objective #6
Typical assumption question stems
9. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Logical opposites
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
10. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Method of Reasoning
Necessary Condition
Primary Objective #1
Premise definition
11. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Method of Reasoning
Errors in the use of evidence
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
12. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Assumption Negation Technique
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Primary Objective #6
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
13. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
14. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Mistaken cause and effect
Premise definition
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
15. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Conclusion Identification Method
Primary Objective #4
Family #3: Hurt
Method of Reasoning questions
16. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Numbers and percentage errors
Mistaken Negation
Family #4: Disprove
Time shift errors
17. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
How to attack a causal conclusion
18. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Rules for Family #3
Sufficient Condition
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
19. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Justify the conclusion formula
Primary Objective #1
20. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Justify the conclusion formula
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Family #1: Prove
Uncertain use of a term or concept
21. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Premise definition
Typical assumption question stems
22. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Primary Objective #4
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Rules for Family #2
How to determine the strength of an argument
23. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Errors of conditional reasoning
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Rules for Family #2
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
24. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
Conclusion Indicators
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Causal statements
Method of Reasoning questions
25. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Primary Objective #3
Mistaken Reversal
Primary Objective #6
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
26. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
How to attack a causal conclusion
Logical negation
Premise definition
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
27. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
How to strengthen an argument
Quantity indicators
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Rules for Family #3
28. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Errors of conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #5
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
29. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
30. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Assumption Negation Technique
Appeal Fallacies
Primary Objective #9
31. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Mistaken Negation
32. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Weakening conditional reasoning
Mistaken Negation
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
33. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Primary Objective #8
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Primary Objective #4
34. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Primary Objective #4
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Family #3: Hurt
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
35. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Errors in the use of evidence
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Primary Objective #2
36. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Numbers and percentage errors
Quantity indicators
Method of Reasoning
37. 1. Incomplete info. The author fails to consider all of the possibilities or relies upon evidence that is incomplete. This flaw can be attacked by bringing up new possibilities or info. 2. Improper comparison. The author attempts to compare two or mo
Common weakening scenarios
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Conclusion definition
38. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
How to determine the strength of an argument
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
How to strengthen an argument
Circular reasoning
39. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Appeal Fallacies
Justify the conclusion formula
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
40. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Primary Objective #6
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
False dilemma
Conclusion definition
41. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Logical negation
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
42. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Primary Objective #4
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
43. Supporter - the traditional linking role - where an assumption connects pieces of the argument. (often new or rogue pieces) They also can close gaps. Ex: All male citizens of athens had the right to vote. Therefore - Socrates had the right to vote in
2 roles played by assumptions
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Rules for Family #1
False dilemma
44. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
Main Point Questions
How to determine the strength of an argument
How to attack a causal conclusion
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
45. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Appeal Fallacies
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Probability indicators
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
46. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
How to attack a causal conclusion
Method of Reasoning questions
Conclusion definition
Survey errors
47. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
How to attack a causal conclusion
Family #4: Disprove
48. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Survey errors
Primary Objective #6
49. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Family #2: Help
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
50. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
How to attack a causal conclusion
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Conclusion definition
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)