SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Causal statements
Survey errors
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
2. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
2 roles played by assumptions
Primary Objective #9
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
3. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Circular reasoning
Primary Objective #1
4. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Appeal Fallacies
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
5. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Method of Reasoning
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Primary Objective #3
Logical opposites
6. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Primary Objective #8
Weakening conditional reasoning
Quantity indicators
7. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
False dilemma
Typical assumption question stems
Conclusion Indicators
Family #3: Hurt
8. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Method of Reasoning questions
Conclusion definition
Primary Objective #3
9. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Primary Objective #8
False analogy
Conclusion Indicators
10. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Errors of composition and division
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Primary Objective #6
Conclusion Identification Method
11. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Family #1: Prove
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Central assumption of causal conclusions
12. 1. if you recognize the form of reasoning used in the stimulus (causal - conditional - etc.) immediately attack the answers and search for the answer with similar reasoning (analogy - circular reasoning) 2. The Conclusion - match the conclusions - to
2 speaker questions
Circular reasoning
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Primary Objective #5
13. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Conclusion Identification Method
Primary Objective #2
Premise definition
Time shift errors
14. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
How to attack a causal conclusion
Common weakening scenarios
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Mistaken Negation
15. Always ask: Do the given facts support the conclusion? Do the premises strongly suggest that the conclusion would be true? Does the conclusion feel like an inevitable result of the premises? Or Does the conclusion go beyond the scope of the info in t
False dilemma
How to determine the strength of an argument
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Conclusion definition
16. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Logical opposites
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Primary Objective #6
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
17. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
Quantity indicators
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
False analogy
How to attack a causal conclusion
18. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Logical negation
Causal statements
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
19. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Method of Reasoning questions
Family #2: Help
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
20. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Conclusion Indicators
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
How to determine the strength of an argument
21. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
22. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Justify the conclusion formula
Method of Reasoning
Quantity indicators
23. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Premise Indicators
Main Point Questions
Exceptional case/over generalization
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
24. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
2 speaker questions
Family #3: Hurt
Straw Man
25. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Time shift errors
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Numbers and percentage errors
Rules for Family #2
26. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Errors of composition and division
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
2 speaker questions
27. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Logical opposites
Primary Objective #2
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
28. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Survey errors
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
29. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Logical negation
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Rules for Family #2
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
30. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Main Point Questions
Justify the conclusion formula
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
31. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
How to strengthen an argument
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Logical opposites
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
32. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Primary Objective #5
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Family #1: Prove
Weakening conditional reasoning
33. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
Causal statements
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Errors of conditional reasoning
34. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Numbers and percentage errors
Family #4: Disprove
Uncertain use of a term or concept
'Additional' Premise Indicators
35. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Conclusion definition
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Typical assumption question stems
36. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
2 speaker questions
Primary Objective #4
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Errors of composition and division
37. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
How to attack a causal conclusion
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Method of Reasoning questions
Sufficient Condition
38. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Numbers and percentage errors
Common weakening scenarios
Errors of composition and division
Mistaken cause and effect
39. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
How to strengthen an argument
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Rules for Family #1
40. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Family #2: Help
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
2 speaker questions
41. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
Conclusion Indicators
Weakening conditional reasoning
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
2 speaker questions
42. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
How to strengthen an argument
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Conclusion Indicators
Premise Indicators
43. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
Primary Objective #5
Method of Reasoning
Errors in the use of evidence
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
44. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Numbers and percentage errors
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Logical negation
45. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Primary Objective #2
Primary Objective #5
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Primary Objective #1
46. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Primary Objective #6
False dilemma
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
47. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Method of Reasoning
48. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Errors of composition and division
Primary Objective #7
Mistaken Reversal
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
49. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Necessary Condition
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Mistaken cause and effect
Straw Man
50. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Main Point Questions
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Errors in the use of evidence
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests