SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. To weaken a conditional conclusion - attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order for the sufficient condition to occur. With a combo of a conditional reasoning stimulus and a weaken question
Premise definition
Assumption Negation Technique
How to attack a causal conclusion
Weakening conditional reasoning
2. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Time shift errors
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Circular reasoning
3. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Exceptional case/over generalization
Causal statements
Straw Man
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
4. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Conclusion Indicators
Circular reasoning
Probability indicators
Weakening conditional reasoning
5. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
False dilemma
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Weaken question signal words
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
6. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Time shift errors
Method of Reasoning
Family #3: Hurt
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
7. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Family #1: Prove
Necessary Condition
Errors of conditional reasoning
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
8. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Primary Objective #2
Primary Objective #5
9. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Family #1: Prove
2 roles played by assumptions
Causal statements
Logical opposites
10. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
Family #1: Prove
Exceptional case/over generalization
Primary Objective #3
Probability indicators
11. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Time shift errors
Typical assumption question stems
Family #4: Disprove
12. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
Mistaken Negation
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Common weakening scenarios
13. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Family #3: Hurt
Method of Reasoning
How to determine the strength of an argument
Method of Reasoning questions
14. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Logical opposites
Method of Reasoning questions
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Mistaken Reversal
15. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Rules for Family #2
Errors of composition and division
How to strengthen an argument
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
16. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Conclusion definition
Conclusion Identification Method
Rules for Family #1
Family #1: Prove
17. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Weakening conditional reasoning
Typical assumption question stems
Conclusion definition
18. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Survey errors
Primary Objective #2
Method of Reasoning questions
19. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
Causal statements
2 speaker questions
Main Point Questions
Premise Indicators
20. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Conclusion definition
Conclusion Identification Method
21. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Appeal Fallacies
How to strengthen an argument
22. 1. if you recognize the form of reasoning used in the stimulus (causal - conditional - etc.) immediately attack the answers and search for the answer with similar reasoning (analogy - circular reasoning) 2. The Conclusion - match the conclusions - to
False dilemma
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Mistaken Reversal
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
23. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Mistaken Reversal
Primary Objective #9
24. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Rules for Family #2
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Counter Premise Indicators
Causal statements
25. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Primary Objective #3
Errors of conditional reasoning
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
26. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Central assumption of causal conclusions
How to attack a causal conclusion
Conclusion Indicators
27. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
False dilemma
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Mistaken Negation
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
28. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Assumption Negation Technique
How to determine the strength of an argument
29. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Circular reasoning
Justify the conclusion formula
Rules for Family #2
Quantity indicators
30. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
False analogy
Causal statements
Errors in the use of evidence
31. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
2 speaker questions
Mistaken Negation
Conclusion Identification Method
Errors in the use of evidence
32. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Sufficient Condition
2 roles played by assumptions
Numbers and percentage errors
33. Supporter - the traditional linking role - where an assumption connects pieces of the argument. (often new or rogue pieces) They also can close gaps. Ex: All male citizens of athens had the right to vote. Therefore - Socrates had the right to vote in
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
False dilemma
Primary Objective #8
2 roles played by assumptions
34. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Premise definition
Weakening conditional reasoning
35. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Method of Reasoning questions
2 roles played by assumptions
Source argument AKA ad hominen
36. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Mistaken cause and effect
Primary Objective #2
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
37. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Primary Objective #7
Straw Man
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
38. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Conclusion Indicators
Appeal Fallacies
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Numbers and percentage errors
39. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Primary Objective #6
Family #4: Disprove
40. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
41. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Errors in the use of evidence
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Conclusion Identification Method
42. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Mistaken cause and effect
Numbers and percentage errors
Straw Man
Counter Premise Indicators
43. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Quantity indicators
Primary Objective #4
Primary Objective #2
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
44. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
False dilemma
Errors of composition and division
Sufficient Condition
45. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Circular reasoning
Probability indicators
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
46. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Errors of composition and division
Primary Objective #9
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Errors in the use of evidence
47. 1. Incomplete info. The author fails to consider all of the possibilities or relies upon evidence that is incomplete. This flaw can be attacked by bringing up new possibilities or info. 2. Improper comparison. The author attempts to compare two or mo
Weakening conditional reasoning
Common weakening scenarios
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
48. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Time shift errors
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Primary Objective #1
Quantity indicators
49. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Method of Reasoning
50. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Mistaken Reversal
Numbers and percentage errors
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Primary Objective #8