SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Family #1: Prove
Central assumption of causal conclusions
How to strengthen an argument
2. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Family #1: Prove
Common weakening scenarios
3. To weaken a conditional conclusion - attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order for the sufficient condition to occur. With a combo of a conditional reasoning stimulus and a weaken question
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Weakening conditional reasoning
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
4. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
2 speaker questions
Logical negation
Uncertain use of a term or concept
5. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Primary Objective #4
Primary Objective #1
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
How to attack a causal conclusion
6. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Conclusion Indicators
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Method of Reasoning questions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
7. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Primary Objective #3
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Rules for Family #3
Rules for Family #2
8. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Appeal Fallacies
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Conclusion Identification Method
Necessary Condition
9. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Time shift errors
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
10. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Rules for Family #2
Rules for Family #3
Family #3: Hurt
Premise definition
11. 1. Incomplete info. The author fails to consider all of the possibilities or relies upon evidence that is incomplete. This flaw can be attacked by bringing up new possibilities or info. 2. Improper comparison. The author attempts to compare two or mo
Primary Objective #4
Common weakening scenarios
Appeal Fallacies
Main Point Questions
12. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Conclusion Indicators
Rules for Family #1
Probability indicators
Premise definition
13. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
Circular reasoning
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Errors of conditional reasoning
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
14. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Numbers and percentage errors
Counter Premise Indicators
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Exceptional case/over generalization
15. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Conclusion definition
Probability indicators
Causal statements
16. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Numbers and percentage errors
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Causal statements
17. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Sufficient Condition
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
2 speaker questions
Assumption Negation Technique
18. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Straw Man
Conclusion definition
Errors of composition and division
Main Point Questions
19. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Mistaken Reversal
Straw Man
Assumption Negation Technique
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
20. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
2 roles played by assumptions
Weaken question signal words
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Conclusion definition
21. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Logical opposites
Primary Objective #7
22. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Conclusion definition
False analogy
Method of Reasoning
Uncertain use of a term or concept
23. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Appeal Fallacies
Primary Objective #5
Premise Indicators
Survey errors
24. Supporter - the traditional linking role - where an assumption connects pieces of the argument. (often new or rogue pieces) They also can close gaps. Ex: All male citizens of athens had the right to vote. Therefore - Socrates had the right to vote in
Probability indicators
2 roles played by assumptions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
'Additional' Premise Indicators
25. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
Conclusion Indicators
Rules for Family #3
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
26. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Logical opposites
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Justify the conclusion formula
27. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Mistaken cause and effect
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
2 speaker questions
28. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Justify the conclusion formula
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Logical negation
Primary Objective #9
29. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
Family #1: Prove
How to strengthen an argument
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Primary Objective #6
30. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Premise Indicators
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Primary Objective #3
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
31. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Primary Objective #9
Survey errors
False dilemma
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
32. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Errors of conditional reasoning
Main Point Questions
Typical assumption question stems
33. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Numbers and percentage errors
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Primary Objective #9
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
34. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Method of Reasoning questions
35. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
Primary Objective #6
Mistaken Reversal
Rules for Family #2
Conclusion Indicators
36. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Errors of composition and division
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Primary Objective #7
37. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
How to attack a causal conclusion
Family #3: Hurt
Primary Objective #8
38. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Sufficient Condition
Errors in the use of evidence
Primary Objective #9
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
39. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
False analogy
Family #3: Hurt
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
40. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Family #4: Disprove
Appeal Fallacies
Primary Objective #8
Common weakening scenarios
41. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Rules for Family #2
Circular reasoning
Logical negation
Main Point Questions
42. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Logical opposites
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Weaken question signal words
43. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Primary Objective #9
Mistaken cause and effect
Main Point Questions
44. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Primary Objective #6
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Primary Objective #2
45. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Family #3: Hurt
Family #1: Prove
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Numbers and percentage errors
46. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Straw Man
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Typical assumption question stems
Numbers and percentage errors
47. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Method of Reasoning questions
Method of Reasoning
Straw Man
Family #2: Help
48. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
Survey errors
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Primary Objective #1
49. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Mistaken Reversal
Exceptional case/over generalization
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
50. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
2 speaker questions
Necessary Condition
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Conclusion Indicators
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests