SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Weakening conditional reasoning
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
2. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Common weakening scenarios
Primary Objective #5
3. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
How to determine the strength of an argument
Primary Objective #9
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
4. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Primary Objective #7
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Uncertain use of a term or concept
5. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Errors of composition and division
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Sufficient Condition
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
6. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Family #1: Prove
Quantity indicators
Common weakening scenarios
Mistaken Reversal
7. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #7
Primary Objective #9
Mistaken Negation
8. To weaken a conditional conclusion - attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order for the sufficient condition to occur. With a combo of a conditional reasoning stimulus and a weaken question
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Weakening conditional reasoning
Sufficient Condition
Premise definition
9. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Mistaken cause and effect
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
10. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Errors of conditional reasoning
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Primary Objective #5
Probability indicators
11. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
False dilemma
Family #2: Help
Causal statements
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
12. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
Family #3: Hurt
Family #1: Prove
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Probability indicators
13. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Errors of conditional reasoning
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Family #4: Disprove
14. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Primary Objective #8
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Primary Objective #3
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
15. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Family #2: Help
16. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
How to strengthen an argument
Logical opposites
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Mistaken Negation
17. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Causal statements
Typical assumption question stems
Mistaken Reversal
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
18. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
'Additional' Premise Indicators
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Mistaken cause and effect
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
19. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
How to strengthen an argument
Primary Objective #8
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Family #2: Help
20. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Necessary Condition
Family #2: Help
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
21. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Family #3: Hurt
Conclusion Identification Method
Errors in the use of evidence
Conclusion definition
22. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
'Additional' Premise Indicators
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Family #2: Help
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
23. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
Primary Objective #3
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
24. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Errors in the use of evidence
Family #4: Disprove
25. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Conclusion Indicators
Family #3: Hurt
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Errors of conditional reasoning
26. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Mistaken Negation
Primary Objective #9
Rules for Family #1
Errors of composition and division
27. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Main Point Questions
Rules for Family #3
Premise Indicators
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
28. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
Counter Premise Indicators
Survey errors
Appeal Fallacies
Numbers and percentage errors
29. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Logical negation
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Assumption Negation Technique
30. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Typical assumption question stems
Errors of conditional reasoning
Family #1: Prove
Time shift errors
31. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance. because the LSAT is concerned solely with argument forms - a speaker can never validly attack the character or motives or a person; instead - a speaker
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Probability indicators
Logical negation
Errors in the use of evidence
32. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
False dilemma
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
33. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Method of Reasoning questions
Probability indicators
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Primary Objective #3
34. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
'Additional' Premise Indicators
2 roles played by assumptions
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
35. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Justify the conclusion formula
Family #4: Disprove
Conclusion Indicators
36. 1. Incomplete info. The author fails to consider all of the possibilities or relies upon evidence that is incomplete. This flaw can be attacked by bringing up new possibilities or info. 2. Improper comparison. The author attempts to compare two or mo
Conclusion Indicators
Primary Objective #3
Common weakening scenarios
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
37. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Method of Reasoning
Counter Premise Indicators
Common weakening scenarios
Primary Objective #5
38. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Causal statements
Mistaken Reversal
Primary Objective #2
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
39. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
How to attack a causal conclusion
Premise Indicators
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
40. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Method of Reasoning questions
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Conclusion Identification Method
41. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Rules for Family #1
Logical opposites
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
42. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Typical assumption question stems
Exceptional case/over generalization
Circular reasoning
43. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Necessary Condition
Circular reasoning
Primary Objective #3
Conclusion definition
44. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
How to determine the strength of an argument
Family #4: Disprove
Quantity indicators
Weakening conditional reasoning
45. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Time shift errors
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Errors of composition and division
46. 1. if you recognize the form of reasoning used in the stimulus (causal - conditional - etc.) immediately attack the answers and search for the answer with similar reasoning (analogy - circular reasoning) 2. The Conclusion - match the conclusions - to
Causal statements
2 speaker questions
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Common weakening scenarios
47. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Conclusion Indicators
Weakening conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #4
How to attack a causal conclusion
48. Always ask: Do the given facts support the conclusion? Do the premises strongly suggest that the conclusion would be true? Does the conclusion feel like an inevitable result of the premises? Or Does the conclusion go beyond the scope of the info in t
Straw Man
How to determine the strength of an argument
Family #3: Hurt
Necessary Condition
49. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Necessary Condition
2 speaker questions
50. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions