SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Conclusion Identification Method
Time shift errors
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Appeal Fallacies
2. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Counter Premise Indicators
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
3. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
How to determine the strength of an argument
Common weakening scenarios
How to strengthen an argument
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
4. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Primary Objective #1
Main Point Questions
Primary Objective #6
2 roles played by assumptions
5. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
Conclusion Indicators
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Primary Objective #8
6. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
How to strengthen an argument
Straw Man
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
False analogy
7. 1. Incomplete info. The author fails to consider all of the possibilities or relies upon evidence that is incomplete. This flaw can be attacked by bringing up new possibilities or info. 2. Improper comparison. The author attempts to compare two or mo
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Common weakening scenarios
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Method of Reasoning
8. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
Causal statements
Rules for Family #3
Method of Reasoning
Primary Objective #3
9. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
10. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Family #2: Help
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Straw Man
11. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
How to attack a causal conclusion
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
12. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Survey errors
Premise Indicators
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
13. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Time shift errors
Typical assumption question stems
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
14. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Premise Indicators
Straw Man
15. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Errors of composition and division
Mistaken Reversal
Rules for Family #2
16. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Main Point Questions
Family #1: Prove
Rules for Family #1
17. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
18. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Primary Objective #2
Counter Premise Indicators
Necessary Condition
2 roles played by assumptions
19. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Logical opposites
Primary Objective #1
Straw Man
2 roles played by assumptions
20. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Primary Objective #9
Probability indicators
Justify the conclusion formula
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
21. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Primary Objective #7
2 speaker questions
22. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
Numbers and percentage errors
Appeal Fallacies
Weakening conditional reasoning
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
23. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Primary Objective #4
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Assumption Negation Technique
Rules for Family #2
24. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
Time shift errors
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
False analogy
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
25. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Assumption Negation Technique
Rules for Family #1
Logical negation
26. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
27. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Conclusion Indicators
Primary Objective #3
Time shift errors
28. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Family #4: Disprove
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Mistaken cause and effect
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
29. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Conclusion definition
Counter Premise Indicators
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
30. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Typical assumption question stems
How to attack a causal conclusion
Exceptional case/over generalization
31. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Primary Objective #8
Mistaken Negation
32. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Counter Premise Indicators
2 roles played by assumptions
Errors of conditional reasoning
Conclusion Identification Method
33. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Time shift errors
34. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance. because the LSAT is concerned solely with argument forms - a speaker can never validly attack the character or motives or a person; instead - a speaker
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Sufficient Condition
35. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Family #1: Prove
Logical negation
Necessary Condition
36. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Errors in the use of evidence
Justify the conclusion formula
Assumption Negation Technique
37. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #2
Family #1: Prove
Mistaken Negation
38. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Sufficient Condition
Primary Objective #8
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Primary Objective #5
39. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
Conclusion definition
Justify the conclusion formula
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
40. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Conclusion Indicators
Conclusion definition
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Method of Reasoning
41. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Conclusion Indicators
Premise Indicators
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
42. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Logical opposites
Errors of conditional reasoning
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Conclusion Indicators
43. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Logical negation
How to determine the strength of an argument
Premise Indicators
44. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Causal statements
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Uncertain use of a term or concept
'Additional' Premise Indicators
45. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
Premise definition
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
How to strengthen an argument
Appeal Fallacies
46. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Primary Objective #6
Primary Objective #5
Necessary Condition
Rules for Family #2
47. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Conclusion Identification Method
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
48. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Numbers and percentage errors
Rules for Family #2
Family #3: Hurt
'Additional' Premise Indicators
49. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Mistaken Negation
Time shift errors
Primary Objective #8
Primary Objective #4
50. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Primary Objective #7
Premise Indicators
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Central assumption of causal conclusions