SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Errors in the use of evidence
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
2. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Counter Premise Indicators
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Rules for Family #1
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
3. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Time shift errors
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
4. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Mistaken Reversal
Premise definition
How to determine the strength of an argument
5. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
2 speaker questions
Primary Objective #4
Logical negation
Straw Man
6. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
2 roles played by assumptions
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Premise definition
7. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
Circular reasoning
Probability indicators
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
How to attack a causal conclusion
8. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Errors of composition and division
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Family #1: Prove
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
9. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Weaken question signal words
Errors in the use of evidence
Justify the conclusion formula
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
10. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
How to determine the strength of an argument
Conclusion Identification Method
Exceptional case/over generalization
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
11. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Method of Reasoning
Primary Objective #6
Primary Objective #9
12. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Conclusion definition
Circular reasoning
13. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Assumption Negation Technique
Survey errors
Sufficient Condition
Premise definition
14. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Family #4: Disprove
Quantity indicators
Causal statements
15. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #5
How to strengthen an argument
Family #1: Prove
16. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Probability indicators
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
17. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
18. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
Source argument AKA ad hominen
2 roles played by assumptions
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
False analogy
19. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Circular reasoning
Logical opposites
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Family #3: Hurt
20. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Causal statements
Primary Objective #1
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
'Additional' Premise Indicators
21. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
How to strengthen an argument
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
22. Supporter - the traditional linking role - where an assumption connects pieces of the argument. (often new or rogue pieces) They also can close gaps. Ex: All male citizens of athens had the right to vote. Therefore - Socrates had the right to vote in
Errors of composition and division
2 roles played by assumptions
Weaken question signal words
Family #2: Help
23. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Primary Objective #1
How to strengthen an argument
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
24. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Rules for Family #2
Weakening conditional reasoning
How to attack a causal conclusion
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
25. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Primary Objective #4
Primary Objective #2
Errors of conditional reasoning
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
26. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Method of Reasoning
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Justify the conclusion formula
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
27. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Primary Objective #1
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Necessary Condition
Family #2: Help
28. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Counter Premise Indicators
Mistaken Negation
Exceptional case/over generalization
29. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Time shift errors
Central assumption of causal conclusions
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Justify the conclusion formula
30. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
Survey errors
Rules for Family #3
Primary Objective #4
Appeal Fallacies
31. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Family #2: Help
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Quantity indicators
Primary Objective #5
32. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Logical negation
Time shift errors
33. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Errors of composition and division
Family #3: Hurt
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
34. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Errors of conditional reasoning
Main Point Questions
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
35. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Straw Man
Premise definition
Primary Objective #3
Errors in the use of evidence
36. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Family #3: Hurt
Primary Objective #1
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Method of Reasoning questions
37. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Primary Objective #7
Errors in the use of evidence
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
38. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Probability indicators
Primary Objective #1
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
39. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Weaken question signal words
Causal statements
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Mistaken cause and effect
40. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Logical negation
Conclusion Identification Method
Primary Objective #8
Weaken question signal words
41. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
False analogy
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Weakening conditional reasoning
42. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Conclusion Identification Method
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
43. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Premise Indicators
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Primary Objective #8
44. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Family #3: Hurt
Necessary Condition
Method of Reasoning
Conclusion Identification Method
45. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
Premise definition
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Primary Objective #5
46. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Primary Objective #8
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Primary Objective #3
Family #2: Help
47. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Survey errors
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Errors of conditional reasoning
48. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Main Point Questions
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
False dilemma
49. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Rules for Family #3
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
How to determine the strength of an argument
50. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Necessary Condition
Appeal Fallacies
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests