SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Rules for Family #2
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
2. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Method of Reasoning questions
Probability indicators
Counter Premise Indicators
3. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
Causal statements
How to attack a causal conclusion
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Central assumption of causal conclusions
4. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
Quantity indicators
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Mistaken Negation
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
5. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Rules for Family #3
Method of Reasoning
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Family #1: Prove
6. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Primary Objective #5
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
How to strengthen an argument
Main Point Questions
7. 1. if you recognize the form of reasoning used in the stimulus (causal - conditional - etc.) immediately attack the answers and search for the answer with similar reasoning (analogy - circular reasoning) 2. The Conclusion - match the conclusions - to
Family #3: Hurt
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Common weakening scenarios
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
8. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Rules for Family #2
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Family #3: Hurt
9. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Straw Man
Sufficient Condition
Errors of conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #6
10. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Circular reasoning
Rules for Family #2
11. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Premise definition
Family #3: Hurt
Primary Objective #7
Family #2: Help
12. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Family #4: Disprove
Method of Reasoning questions
Family #3: Hurt
Primary Objective #4
13. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #2
Weaken question signal words
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
14. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
Numbers and percentage errors
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
How to strengthen an argument
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
15. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Sufficient Condition
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Primary Objective #9
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
16. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Premise definition
Primary Objective #7
Time shift errors
17. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
18. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
How to attack a causal conclusion
Errors in the use of evidence
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
19. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Appeal Fallacies
Weakening conditional reasoning
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Mistaken Negation
20. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Mistaken Negation
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
21. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Causal statements
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Premise definition
Quantity indicators
22. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Family #3: Hurt
False dilemma
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
23. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Errors of conditional reasoning
Method of Reasoning
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
24. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Primary Objective #9
Method of Reasoning
Errors of conditional reasoning
25. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Common weakening scenarios
Rules for Family #1
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Logical negation
26. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Justify the conclusion formula
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
27. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
28. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
Conclusion Identification Method
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Exceptional case/over generalization
Quantity indicators
29. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
False dilemma
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
30. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Survey errors
Mistaken cause and effect
Logical opposites
31. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Family #3: Hurt
Logical negation
Causal statements
32. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
False analogy
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Logical negation
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
33. At least on of the two - possibly both.
34. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Straw Man
Premise definition
Method of Reasoning questions
35. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Primary Objective #3
Primary Objective #9
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #8
36. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Primary Objective #5
Logical opposites
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
37. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
Weaken question signal words
Rules for Family #2
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Rules for Family #3
38. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Rules for Family #3
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Family #1: Prove
39. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Common weakening scenarios
How to attack a causal conclusion
Family #3: Hurt
40. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Family #1: Prove
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
41. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
2 speaker questions
Justify the conclusion formula
42. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Primary Objective #1
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
43. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Logical negation
Premise Indicators
44. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Primary Objective #8
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Circular reasoning
45. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
False analogy
Typical assumption question stems
Primary Objective #7
Family #2: Help
46. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Errors in the use of evidence
Primary Objective #3
Method of Reasoning
47. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Primary Objective #1
Primary Objective #5
Rules for Family #3
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
48. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Errors of composition and division
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Typical assumption question stems
49. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Counter Premise Indicators
Premise Indicators
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Appeal Fallacies
50. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Mistaken Negation
Primary Objective #8