SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
How to strengthen an argument
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Family #4: Disprove
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
2. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
3. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Premise definition
False dilemma
Causal statements
False analogy
4. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Conclusion Indicators
Weakening conditional reasoning
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Sufficient Condition
5. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
False dilemma
Primary Objective #7
6. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Typical assumption question stems
Conclusion Indicators
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Errors of composition and division
7. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Method of Reasoning questions
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
False analogy
Primary Objective #9
8. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
9. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Premise Indicators
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Primary Objective #1
10. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
Main Point Questions
Primary Objective #4
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
11. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Primary Objective #2
Uncertain use of a term or concept
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Family #4: Disprove
12. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Numbers and percentage errors
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Time shift errors
13. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Primary Objective #3
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Main Point Questions
Premise definition
14. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Method of Reasoning questions
Main Point Questions
Probability indicators
15. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
How to attack a causal conclusion
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Common weakening scenarios
16. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Survey errors
Mistaken Negation
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Uncertain use of a term or concept
17. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Logical negation
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Typical assumption question stems
18. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Rules for Family #3
Exceptional case/over generalization
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
19. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Family #3: Hurt
How to determine the strength of an argument
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Primary Objective #8
20. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
False dilemma
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
How to determine the strength of an argument
21. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Typical assumption question stems
2 roles played by assumptions
Primary Objective #1
Survey errors
22. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Family #2: Help
Circular reasoning
Primary Objective #4
23. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Survey errors
Circular reasoning
Weaken question signal words
Rules for Family #1
24. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Main Point Questions
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Numbers and percentage errors
25. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Errors of conditional reasoning
Circular reasoning
Family #3: Hurt
26. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Primary Objective #2
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
27. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Conclusion definition
How to determine the strength of an argument
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
28. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
How to strengthen an argument
Errors of conditional reasoning
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Rules for Family #2
29. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
Appeal Fallacies
Primary Objective #8
2 roles played by assumptions
2 speaker questions
30. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Weaken question signal words
Straw Man
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Family #3: Hurt
31. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Conclusion Identification Method
Exceptional case/over generalization
Weaken question signal words
Conclusion definition
32. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Mistaken cause and effect
Source argument AKA ad hominen
2 roles played by assumptions
Primary Objective #7
33. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Premise definition
Conclusion Indicators
Assumption Negation Technique
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
34. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Main Point Questions
Primary Objective #7
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
35. Always ask: Do the given facts support the conclusion? Do the premises strongly suggest that the conclusion would be true? Does the conclusion feel like an inevitable result of the premises? Or Does the conclusion go beyond the scope of the info in t
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Logical negation
How to determine the strength of an argument
Conclusion Identification Method
36. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Errors in the use of evidence
Family #3: Hurt
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
37. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #1
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
38. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Main Point Questions
How to determine the strength of an argument
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
39. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Probability indicators
Typical assumption question stems
Primary Objective #8
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
40. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Straw Man
Circular reasoning
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Main Point Questions
41. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Rules for Family #2
Rules for Family #3
42. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Primary Objective #6
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Counter Premise Indicators
Survey errors
43. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Conclusion Identification Method
Primary Objective #4
Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #3
44. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
How to attack a causal conclusion
Rules for Family #2
How to strengthen an argument
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
45. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
How to attack a causal conclusion
Method of Reasoning
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Family #2: Help
46. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Main Point Questions
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
47. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Logical opposites
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Primary Objective #7
Primary Objective #5
48. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Rules for Family #1
2 speaker questions
49. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Primary Objective #1
Probability indicators
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
50. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Primary Objective #1
Justify the conclusion formula
Central assumption of causal conclusions