SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
Weaken question signal words
Errors in the use of evidence
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Appeal Fallacies
2. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Rules for Family #2
Mistaken cause and effect
3. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Conclusion Identification Method
Mistaken cause and effect
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
How to determine the strength of an argument
4. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Weakening conditional reasoning
5. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
2 roles played by assumptions
Premise Indicators
Logical negation
6. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Straw Man
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Conclusion Indicators
7. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Errors of conditional reasoning
Rules for Family #1
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
8. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Causal statements
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
9. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Conclusion definition
Quantity indicators
Exceptional case/over generalization
Premise definition
10. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Errors of composition and division
11. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Family #1: Prove
Primary Objective #5
Logical negation
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
12. Always ask: Do the given facts support the conclusion? Do the premises strongly suggest that the conclusion would be true? Does the conclusion feel like an inevitable result of the premises? Or Does the conclusion go beyond the scope of the info in t
Probability indicators
How to determine the strength of an argument
False dilemma
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
13. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Primary Objective #9
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Appeal Fallacies
Primary Objective #2
14. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Mistaken Reversal
False dilemma
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Time shift errors
15. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
Family #2: Help
Rules for Family #3
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Errors in the use of evidence
16. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Exceptional case/over generalization
17. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
18. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
False dilemma
Rules for Family #3
19. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Primary Objective #4
Logical opposites
Primary Objective #3
Mistaken cause and effect
20. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Weakening conditional reasoning
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
False analogy
21. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Circular reasoning
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Source argument AKA ad hominen
22. To weaken a conditional conclusion - attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order for the sufficient condition to occur. With a combo of a conditional reasoning stimulus and a weaken question
Weakening conditional reasoning
Conclusion Indicators
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
How to attack a causal conclusion
23. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Straw Man
Mistaken cause and effect
Primary Objective #8
24. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
False analogy
Counter Premise Indicators
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Appeal Fallacies
25. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Mistaken Negation
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Errors of conditional reasoning
Source argument AKA ad hominen
26. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Probability indicators
Main Point Questions
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
27. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Family #1: Prove
Primary Objective #8
Exceptional case/over generalization
28. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Mistaken Reversal
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Weakening conditional reasoning
29. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Rules for Family #1
Primary Objective #4
Family #3: Hurt
Time shift errors
30. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Errors of composition and division
How to determine the strength of an argument
Primary Objective #7
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
31. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Primary Objective #6
Main Point Questions
Justify the conclusion formula
32. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Errors of composition and division
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
33. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Family #1: Prove
34. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Rules for Family #2
Mistaken Negation
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
2 speaker questions
35. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Primary Objective #2
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Sufficient Condition
Quantity indicators
36. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Conclusion Indicators
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
37. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Assumption Negation Technique
Typical assumption question stems
How to strengthen an argument
Primary Objective #1
38. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Errors of composition and division
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
39. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Exceptional case/over generalization
Appeal Fallacies
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Main Point Questions
40. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Straw Man
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Errors in the use of evidence
41. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Appeal Fallacies
Justify the conclusion formula
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
42. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Numbers and percentage errors
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Primary Objective #8
Logical negation
43. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Quantity indicators
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Time shift errors
44. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
Quantity indicators
Rules for Family #2
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Errors of composition and division
45. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Rules for Family #1
Errors of conditional reasoning
Weaken question signal words
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
46. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Straw Man
47. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Errors in the use of evidence
Survey errors
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
48. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Family #2: Help
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Source argument AKA ad hominen
49. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Family #3: Hurt
Errors of conditional reasoning
50. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
Primary Objective #8
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Appeal Fallacies
Survey errors