SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Conclusion definition
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
2. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Counter Premise Indicators
Necessary Condition
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
3. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Primary Objective #5
Primary Objective #3
Uncertain use of a term or concept
How to attack a causal conclusion
4. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Probability indicators
Appeal Fallacies
Central assumption of causal conclusions
5. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
2 roles played by assumptions
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Conclusion Identification Method
6. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
Logical opposites
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Counter Premise Indicators
7. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Weaken question signal words
Survey errors
Necessary Condition
8. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Family #3: Hurt
Method of Reasoning questions
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
9. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Central assumption of causal conclusions
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Premise definition
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
10. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Family #1: Prove
Premise definition
False analogy
11. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Family #1: Prove
Primary Objective #2
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Common weakening scenarios
12. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Typical assumption question stems
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Quantity indicators
Premise Indicators
13. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Family #2: Help
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
14. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Errors of conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #8
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Rules for Family #2
15. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Primary Objective #3
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Method of Reasoning questions
Causal statements
16. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Mistaken Negation
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Mistaken cause and effect
17. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Straw Man
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Survey errors
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
18. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
19. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
Straw Man
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #5
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
20. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Sufficient Condition
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
21. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
False dilemma
Errors of composition and division
Causal statements
22. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Straw Man
Circular reasoning
Numbers and percentage errors
23. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Rules for Family #1
Family #3: Hurt
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
24. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Sufficient Condition
Logical opposites
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Family #3: Hurt
25. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Conclusion definition
Family #3: Hurt
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Family #2: Help
26. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Method of Reasoning
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Family #4: Disprove
27. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Straw Man
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Justify the conclusion formula
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
28. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Family #2: Help
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
29. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Counter Premise Indicators
Conclusion Indicators
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Sufficient Condition
30. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Appeal Fallacies
Method of Reasoning
31. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Appeal Fallacies
Weaken question signal words
Mistaken Reversal
32. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
Method of Reasoning
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Logical opposites
33. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
False analogy
Assumption Negation Technique
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
34. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Rules for Family #2
Exceptional case/over generalization
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
35. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Common weakening scenarios
Probability indicators
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Family #1: Prove
36. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Errors in the use of evidence
Conclusion Identification Method
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Errors of conditional reasoning
37. To weaken a conditional conclusion - attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order for the sufficient condition to occur. With a combo of a conditional reasoning stimulus and a weaken question
Weakening conditional reasoning
Causal statements
Survey errors
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
38. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Weaken question signal words
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Circular reasoning
Primary Objective #1
39. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Primary Objective #6
Primary Objective #1
40. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
False dilemma
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Family #4: Disprove
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
41. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Probability indicators
Family #2: Help
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Mistaken Negation
42. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
Numbers and percentage errors
2 speaker questions
Uncertain use of a term or concept
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
43. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Appeal Fallacies
Primary Objective #9
Family #2: Help
Primary Objective #2
44. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Mistaken Reversal
Primary Objective #9
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
45. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Conclusion Identification Method
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
46. Always ask: Do the given facts support the conclusion? Do the premises strongly suggest that the conclusion would be true? Does the conclusion feel like an inevitable result of the premises? Or Does the conclusion go beyond the scope of the info in t
Primary Objective #1
Counter Premise Indicators
How to determine the strength of an argument
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
47. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Weakening conditional reasoning
Errors in the use of evidence
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
48. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Primary Objective #8
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
49. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Logical opposites
Primary Objective #7
50. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Typical assumption question stems
Quantity indicators
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions