SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
Primary Objective #5
Probability indicators
Mistaken Reversal
How to attack a causal conclusion
2. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Errors of composition and division
Weaken question signal words
Straw Man
3. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Rules for Family #2
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Main Point Questions
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
4. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Conclusion Identification Method
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Source argument AKA ad hominen
5. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Primary Objective #7
Family #4: Disprove
How to strengthen an argument
6. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Quantity indicators
Mistaken cause and effect
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
7. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Conclusion Indicators
Main Point Questions
Primary Objective #8
8. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Logical opposites
Rules for Family #1
Appeal Fallacies
Primary Objective #9
9. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Family #1: Prove
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
10. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Survey errors
Family #3: Hurt
2 roles played by assumptions
11. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Assumption Negation Technique
Logical opposites
How to strengthen an argument
12. 1. Incomplete info. The author fails to consider all of the possibilities or relies upon evidence that is incomplete. This flaw can be attacked by bringing up new possibilities or info. 2. Improper comparison. The author attempts to compare two or mo
Common weakening scenarios
2 roles played by assumptions
Probability indicators
False analogy
13. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
How to strengthen an argument
Weakening conditional reasoning
False analogy
14. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Mistaken Reversal
Conclusion Identification Method
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Primary Objective #4
15. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Mistaken Negation
Primary Objective #6
Sufficient Condition
16. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Mistaken Negation
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Primary Objective #9
Causal statements
17. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
Weakening conditional reasoning
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
18. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Family #1: Prove
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Quantity indicators
'Additional' Premise Indicators
19. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Family #1: Prove
Numbers and percentage errors
20. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
2 speaker questions
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Time shift errors
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
21. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
22. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Probability indicators
Conclusion definition
Primary Objective #6
23. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Primary Objective #8
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
2 roles played by assumptions
24. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
Sufficient Condition
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Survey errors
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
25. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
Survey errors
Sufficient Condition
Premise definition
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
26. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Weaken question signal words
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
27. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
Appeal Fallacies
How to determine the strength of an argument
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
28. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Method of Reasoning questions
Time shift errors
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Uncertain use of a term or concept
29. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
Survey errors
Quantity indicators
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Errors in the use of evidence
30. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Appeal Fallacies
Primary Objective #7
Typical assumption question stems
Premise definition
31. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Primary Objective #7
32. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Conclusion Identification Method
Method of Reasoning
Family #2: Help
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
33. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Weaken question signal words
34. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Circular reasoning
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
35. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Errors of conditional reasoning
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
False dilemma
36. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Assumption Negation Technique
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Justify the conclusion formula
Quantity indicators
37. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Sufficient Condition
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Mistaken Reversal
38. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
39. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Weakening conditional reasoning
Time shift errors
Causal statements
40. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
How to strengthen an argument
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Errors of composition and division
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
41. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Straw Man
Necessary Condition
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
42. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
'Additional' Premise Indicators
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Logical negation
43. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Primary Objective #2
Numbers and percentage errors
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Common weakening scenarios
44. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Counter Premise Indicators
Straw Man
Primary Objective #1
Weaken question signal words
45. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Survey errors
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Sufficient Condition
46. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
False analogy
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Rules for Family #2
Errors in the use of evidence
47. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance. because the LSAT is concerned solely with argument forms - a speaker can never validly attack the character or motives or a person; instead - a speaker
Mistaken Negation
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Source argument AKA ad hominen
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
48. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Sufficient Condition
Primary Objective #7
Necessary Condition
Primary Objective #9
49. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
50. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
Method of Reasoning questions
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #8
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests