SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Weaken question signal words
Numbers and percentage errors
How to strengthen an argument
Central assumption of causal conclusions
2. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Probability indicators
Weaken question signal words
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
3. 1. if you recognize the form of reasoning used in the stimulus (causal - conditional - etc.) immediately attack the answers and search for the answer with similar reasoning (analogy - circular reasoning) 2. The Conclusion - match the conclusions - to
Justify the conclusion formula
Exceptional case/over generalization
Family #3: Hurt
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
4. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
False analogy
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
5. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Logical negation
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Weakening conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #5
6. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Premise definition
Circular reasoning
Primary Objective #7
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
7. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Family #3: Hurt
Family #4: Disprove
Typical assumption question stems
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
8. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Straw Man
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Source argument AKA ad hominen
9. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Primary Objective #8
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Primary Objective #4
10. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Family #4: Disprove
Method of Reasoning questions
Justify the conclusion formula
Central assumption of causal conclusions
11. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Numbers and percentage errors
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
12. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Primary Objective #3
Method of Reasoning
Justify the conclusion formula
13. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Logical opposites
Rules for Family #1
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
14. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Family #4: Disprove
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Primary Objective #6
15. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
Conclusion Indicators
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Method of Reasoning
Central assumption of causal conclusions
16. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
How to attack a causal conclusion
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
17. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
18. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Logical opposites
Family #1: Prove
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
19. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
How to attack a causal conclusion
Circular reasoning
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
20. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Method of Reasoning questions
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Conclusion definition
Primary Objective #2
21. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Primary Objective #6
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Errors of composition and division
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
22. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Primary Objective #5
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Premise definition
23. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Time shift errors
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
24. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Primary Objective #3
Method of Reasoning questions
Logical negation
25. To weaken a conditional conclusion - attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order for the sufficient condition to occur. With a combo of a conditional reasoning stimulus and a weaken question
Counter Premise Indicators
Weaken question signal words
Method of Reasoning
Weakening conditional reasoning
26. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
2 speaker questions
Primary Objective #9
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
27. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Main Point Questions
How to strengthen an argument
Probability indicators
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
28. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Source argument AKA ad hominen
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Method of Reasoning questions
29. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Rules for Family #2
Family #2: Help
Premise Indicators
Causal statements
30. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Necessary Condition
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
31. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Rules for Family #3
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Circular reasoning
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
32. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Sufficient Condition
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Premise Indicators
Errors of composition and division
33. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Survey errors
Justify the conclusion formula
34. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
35. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Counter Premise Indicators
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
36. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
False analogy
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
2 roles played by assumptions
Logical opposites
37. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
Causal statements
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Errors of composition and division
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
38. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Method of Reasoning
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Logical opposites
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
39. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #3
Weakening conditional reasoning
40. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
Conclusion Indicators
Rules for Family #2
2 speaker questions
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
41. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Common weakening scenarios
Errors in the use of evidence
42. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Typical assumption question stems
Rules for Family #3
Quantity indicators
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
43. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Mistaken Reversal
Errors of conditional reasoning
Necessary Condition
How to attack a causal conclusion
44. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Uncertain use of a term or concept
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
45. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance. because the LSAT is concerned solely with argument forms - a speaker can never validly attack the character or motives or a person; instead - a speaker
Common weakening scenarios
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Primary Objective #4
Source argument AKA ad hominen
46. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Counter Premise Indicators
Family #2: Help
Typical assumption question stems
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
47. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Exceptional case/over generalization
Typical assumption question stems
Quantity indicators
Method of Reasoning questions
48. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
How to attack a causal conclusion
Primary Objective #5
Primary Objective #2
49. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #1
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Mistaken Reversal
50. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Primary Objective #2
Errors of conditional reasoning
False dilemma
False analogy
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests