SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Appeal Fallacies
Logical negation
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Justify the conclusion formula
2. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #5
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
3. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Family #1: Prove
Necessary Condition
Causal statements
4. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Exceptional case/over generalization
Conclusion definition
Necessary Condition
5. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Main Point Questions
Family #1: Prove
2 roles played by assumptions
6. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Primary Objective #6
Mistaken Reversal
Primary Objective #3
7. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
Family #3: Hurt
Conclusion Indicators
Weaken question signal words
Conclusion Identification Method
8. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
9. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Rules for Family #1
How to determine the strength of an argument
Mistaken Negation
10. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Primary Objective #5
Rules for Family #3
Common weakening scenarios
11. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Survey errors
Family #3: Hurt
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
12. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Necessary Condition
Straw Man
Errors of conditional reasoning
Main Point Questions
13. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Rules for Family #2
Primary Objective #7
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Mistaken Reversal
14. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Primary Objective #1
Exceptional case/over generalization
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
15. Supporter - the traditional linking role - where an assumption connects pieces of the argument. (often new or rogue pieces) They also can close gaps. Ex: All male citizens of athens had the right to vote. Therefore - Socrates had the right to vote in
2 speaker questions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
2 roles played by assumptions
Justify the conclusion formula
16. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Primary Objective #5
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Straw Man
17. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
Conclusion Indicators
Method of Reasoning
Quantity indicators
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
18. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Counter Premise Indicators
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Causal statements
Errors of conditional reasoning
19. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
How to determine the strength of an argument
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
20. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Family #4: Disprove
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Primary Objective #9
21. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Family #4: Disprove
Mistaken cause and effect
Primary Objective #7
22. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Method of Reasoning questions
Main Point Questions
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
23. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Conclusion Indicators
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
24. Always ask: Do the given facts support the conclusion? Do the premises strongly suggest that the conclusion would be true? Does the conclusion feel like an inevitable result of the premises? Or Does the conclusion go beyond the scope of the info in t
Necessary Condition
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Primary Objective #7
How to determine the strength of an argument
25. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Probability indicators
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Primary Objective #6
How to determine the strength of an argument
26. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
False analogy
Primary Objective #9
How to strengthen an argument
Method of Reasoning questions
27. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Premise definition
Necessary Condition
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Quantity indicators
28. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
2 speaker questions
Primary Objective #4
Main Point Questions
29. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Primary Objective #1
Weakening conditional reasoning
Probability indicators
Quantity indicators
30. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Primary Objective #4
Time shift errors
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Errors of conditional reasoning
31. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Mistaken Negation
Rules for Family #1
Time shift errors
Survey errors
32. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Primary Objective #4
False analogy
Mistaken cause and effect
33. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
Assumption Negation Technique
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
False analogy
Errors of composition and division
34. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Straw Man
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Time shift errors
Logical opposites
35. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
False analogy
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Errors in the use of evidence
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
36. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Causal statements
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
37. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
2 speaker questions
False analogy
Family #3: Hurt
38. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Rules for Family #1
Main Point Questions
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Family #2: Help
39. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #1
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Uncertain use of a term or concept
40. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Premise definition
Circular reasoning
Primary Objective #7
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
41. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Probability indicators
How to attack a causal conclusion
Primary Objective #8
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
42. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Primary Objective #3
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
43. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
Central assumption of causal conclusions
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Survey errors
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
44. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Typical assumption question stems
Mistaken cause and effect
45. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
2 roles played by assumptions
Premise definition
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Primary Objective #1
46. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Weaken question signal words
47. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Numbers and percentage errors
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Primary Objective #8
48. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Logical negation
How to determine the strength of an argument
Premise Indicators
Rules for Family #2
49. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Family #1: Prove
Numbers and percentage errors
Primary Objective #9
Common weakening scenarios
50. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Family #4: Disprove
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Rules for Family #2
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions