SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Primary Objective #6
How to attack a causal conclusion
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Time shift errors
2. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
3. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
4. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Sufficient Condition
False analogy
Family #2: Help
5. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Premise Indicators
Logical opposites
Numbers and percentage errors
Necessary Condition
6. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Mistaken cause and effect
2 roles played by assumptions
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
7. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Circular reasoning
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Primary Objective #2
8. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Probability indicators
Numbers and percentage errors
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
9. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
How to attack a causal conclusion
Mistaken Negation
2 roles played by assumptions
Conclusion Indicators
10. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Source argument AKA ad hominen
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
11. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Logical opposites
Rules for Family #1
Conclusion Identification Method
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
12. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Primary Objective #9
13. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
14. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Family #4: Disprove
False analogy
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
2 speaker questions
15. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Primary Objective #8
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Necessary Condition
16. Supporter - the traditional linking role - where an assumption connects pieces of the argument. (often new or rogue pieces) They also can close gaps. Ex: All male citizens of athens had the right to vote. Therefore - Socrates had the right to vote in
2 roles played by assumptions
Primary Objective #4
Conclusion Indicators
Errors in the use of evidence
17. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Family #4: Disprove
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
18. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Family #4: Disprove
Logical negation
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
19. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Family #2: Help
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Uncertain use of a term or concept
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
20. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Exceptional case/over generalization
Mistaken Negation
How to strengthen an argument
Mistaken Reversal
21. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
22. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Primary Objective #3
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Errors of conditional reasoning
23. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Primary Objective #9
Family #2: Help
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
24. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
2 roles played by assumptions
Survey errors
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
25. Always ask: Do the given facts support the conclusion? Do the premises strongly suggest that the conclusion would be true? Does the conclusion feel like an inevitable result of the premises? Or Does the conclusion go beyond the scope of the info in t
How to determine the strength of an argument
Logical negation
Justify the conclusion formula
Errors of composition and division
26. 1. Incomplete info. The author fails to consider all of the possibilities or relies upon evidence that is incomplete. This flaw can be attacked by bringing up new possibilities or info. 2. Improper comparison. The author attempts to compare two or mo
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Common weakening scenarios
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
How to determine the strength of an argument
27. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Straw Man
Source argument AKA ad hominen
28. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Justify the conclusion formula
Errors of conditional reasoning
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Family #1: Prove
29. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Rules for Family #2
Survey errors
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Exceptional case/over generalization
30. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #4
Rules for Family #2
31. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
32. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Justify the conclusion formula
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Weaken question signal words
33. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Primary Objective #3
Method of Reasoning questions
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
34. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
False analogy
35. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Straw Man
Family #3: Hurt
Primary Objective #7
Rules for Family #3
36. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
Rules for Family #1
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Errors of conditional reasoning
Exceptional case/over generalization
37. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Primary Objective #8
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Mistaken cause and effect
38. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Premise definition
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Main Point Questions
39. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Quantity indicators
Conclusion definition
Numbers and percentage errors
Family #3: Hurt
40. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
Mistaken cause and effect
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
False analogy
Primary Objective #2
41. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Errors of conditional reasoning
42. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Logical opposites
Premise Indicators
43. To weaken a conditional conclusion - attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order for the sufficient condition to occur. With a combo of a conditional reasoning stimulus and a weaken question
Errors of composition and division
Weakening conditional reasoning
Method of Reasoning
Necessary Condition
44. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Family #4: Disprove
Errors of composition and division
Premise definition
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
45. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
'Additional' Premise Indicators
2 speaker questions
Family #2: Help
Family #1: Prove
46. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Conclusion Identification Method
Circular reasoning
Primary Objective #5
Central assumption of causal conclusions
47. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Method of Reasoning questions
Conclusion Identification Method
Appeal Fallacies
Family #1: Prove
48. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Circular reasoning
Primary Objective #6
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
49. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
50. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Straw Man
False dilemma
Method of Reasoning