SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
How to determine the strength of an argument
Conclusion definition
Primary Objective #8
False analogy
2. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Conclusion definition
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
3. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Exceptional case/over generalization
Premise Indicators
Mistaken Negation
4. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Family #4: Disprove
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Premise Indicators
5. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Method of Reasoning
Primary Objective #4
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #5
6. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Conclusion Identification Method
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
7. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Mistaken Negation
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
2 speaker questions
8. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Source argument AKA ad hominen
How to strengthen an argument
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Appeal Fallacies
9. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Main Point Questions
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
'Additional' Premise Indicators
10. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Rules for Family #2
Justify the conclusion formula
Sufficient Condition
How to strengthen an argument
11. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Primary Objective #4
Conclusion definition
Survey errors
Quantity indicators
12. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Numbers and percentage errors
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Family #4: Disprove
13. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
How to attack a causal conclusion
Method of Reasoning
Conclusion Indicators
How to determine the strength of an argument
14. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
Necessary Condition
Numbers and percentage errors
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Logical negation
15. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Appeal Fallacies
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Rules for Family #2
Family #2: Help
16. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Rules for Family #1
Typical assumption question stems
Primary Objective #6
17. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Logical opposites
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
18. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
19. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Primary Objective #2
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Weaken question signal words
Uncertain use of a term or concept
20. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
2 roles played by assumptions
Errors of composition and division
Family #1: Prove
21. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Family #1: Prove
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Primary Objective #6
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
22. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
Straw Man
How to strengthen an argument
Errors in the use of evidence
'Additional' Premise Indicators
23. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Family #2: Help
Quantity indicators
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
24. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #9
Exceptional case/over generalization
25. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance. because the LSAT is concerned solely with argument forms - a speaker can never validly attack the character or motives or a person; instead - a speaker
Primary Objective #1
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Method of Reasoning questions
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
26. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Family #3: Hurt
Primary Objective #3
27. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Primary Objective #7
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Circular reasoning
28. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Family #4: Disprove
Conclusion Identification Method
Primary Objective #9
29. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Premise definition
Assumption Negation Technique
30. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Mistaken Negation
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Appeal Fallacies
Mistaken cause and effect
31. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Numbers and percentage errors
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
2 roles played by assumptions
32. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Straw Man
False analogy
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
33. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Conclusion definition
Quantity indicators
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
34. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Rules for Family #3
Conclusion Indicators
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
35. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Quantity indicators
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
36. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
Premise definition
Primary Objective #1
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
37. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Appeal Fallacies
38. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Errors of conditional reasoning
Sufficient Condition
Time shift errors
2 speaker questions
39. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Family #2: Help
Appeal Fallacies
Main Point Questions
Premise definition
40. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
41. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
False dilemma
Conclusion definition
42. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Premise definition
Mistaken Reversal
Primary Objective #4
43. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Method of Reasoning
Errors in the use of evidence
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Appeal Fallacies
44. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Rules for Family #1
Primary Objective #7
Weaken question signal words
45. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
46. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
How to determine the strength of an argument
Uncertain use of a term or concept
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Rules for Family #3
47. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Primary Objective #2
Primary Objective #6
Method of Reasoning questions
48. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Causal statements
Logical negation
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Counter Premise Indicators
49. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Primary Objective #2
Rules for Family #2
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Mistaken Negation
50. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Method of Reasoning
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Time shift errors
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests