SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Rules for Family #3
False dilemma
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Logical opposites
2. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
2 speaker questions
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
3. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
2 speaker questions
Probability indicators
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Errors in the use of evidence
4. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Mistaken Negation
Probability indicators
Central assumption of causal conclusions
False analogy
5. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Primary Objective #4
Rules for Family #1
Uncertain use of a term or concept
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
6. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Rules for Family #2
Straw Man
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Main Point Questions
7. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Primary Objective #7
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Common weakening scenarios
8. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Errors of conditional reasoning
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
9. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Rules for Family #1
Rules for Family #2
Quantity indicators
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
10. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Appeal Fallacies
11. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Weakening conditional reasoning
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Primary Objective #6
12. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Errors of composition and division
Assumption Negation Technique
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Primary Objective #6
13. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Logical negation
Family #3: Hurt
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
14. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
False dilemma
Errors of conditional reasoning
15. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Primary Objective #9
Weakening conditional reasoning
Logical opposites
16. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Rules for Family #3
Straw Man
Numbers and percentage errors
17. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Primary Objective #2
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
18. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Rules for Family #1
Assumption Negation Technique
19. Supporter - the traditional linking role - where an assumption connects pieces of the argument. (often new or rogue pieces) They also can close gaps. Ex: All male citizens of athens had the right to vote. Therefore - Socrates had the right to vote in
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Mistaken cause and effect
2 roles played by assumptions
Family #2: Help
20. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Rules for Family #2
Errors of conditional reasoning
Method of Reasoning questions
21. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Primary Objective #3
Primary Objective #1
Logical negation
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
22. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Conclusion Indicators
Appeal Fallacies
23. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
How to strengthen an argument
Primary Objective #5
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
24. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Assumption Negation Technique
Rules for Family #2
Conclusion Indicators
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
25. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Counter Premise Indicators
Survey errors
26. Always ask: Do the given facts support the conclusion? Do the premises strongly suggest that the conclusion would be true? Does the conclusion feel like an inevitable result of the premises? Or Does the conclusion go beyond the scope of the info in t
Errors in the use of evidence
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Conclusion definition
How to determine the strength of an argument
27. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Rules for Family #3
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
28. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Mistaken Negation
Conclusion Identification Method
Sufficient Condition
Time shift errors
29. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
False dilemma
How to strengthen an argument
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Logical opposites
30. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
31. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Method of Reasoning
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
32. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #4
Method of Reasoning questions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
33. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
Exceptional case/over generalization
How to strengthen an argument
2 speaker questions
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
34. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Conclusion definition
Mistaken cause and effect
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Straw Man
35. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
Quantity indicators
Survey errors
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
36. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
Source argument AKA ad hominen
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
False dilemma
Appeal Fallacies
37. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Mistaken cause and effect
Main Point Questions
Primary Objective #8
38. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Straw Man
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Mistaken cause and effect
Typical assumption question stems
39. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Straw Man
Probability indicators
Premise definition
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
40. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
How to strengthen an argument
Family #1: Prove
Rules for Family #1
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
41. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Justify the conclusion formula
Primary Objective #8
Method of Reasoning
Sufficient Condition
42. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Mistaken Reversal
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Premise definition
Uncertain use of a term or concept
43. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Mistaken cause and effect
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
44. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
How to attack a causal conclusion
Survey errors
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Counter Premise Indicators
45. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Primary Objective #4
Errors in the use of evidence
Weakening conditional reasoning
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
46. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
Typical assumption question stems
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Uncertain use of a term or concept
47. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Primary Objective #5
Mistaken Reversal
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Logical opposites
48. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Typical assumption question stems
Necessary Condition
Weakening conditional reasoning
Circular reasoning
49. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Causal statements
Conclusion Indicators
Rules for Family #2
Rules for Family #1
50. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Survey errors
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Words used to introduce a necessary condition