SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Primary Objective #7
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Errors in the use of evidence
2. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
Weakening conditional reasoning
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Survey errors
'Additional' Premise Indicators
3. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Quantity indicators
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #7
4. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
Rules for Family #3
Family #4: Disprove
Mistaken Negation
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
5. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Primary Objective #6
Appeal Fallacies
Family #2: Help
6. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
2 speaker questions
Exceptional case/over generalization
Premise Indicators
7. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
2 roles played by assumptions
Primary Objective #3
Family #4: Disprove
Family #3: Hurt
8. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Mistaken cause and effect
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Quantity indicators
Primary Objective #2
9. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Primary Objective #9
Conclusion definition
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
10. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Numbers and percentage errors
False dilemma
Mistaken Reversal
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
11. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
12. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Primary Objective #2
Primary Objective #3
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
13. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Source argument AKA ad hominen
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Primary Objective #3
14. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Weaken question signal words
Causal statements
Method of Reasoning
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
15. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Errors of composition and division
Rules for Family #1
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
16. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Weakening conditional reasoning
How to strengthen an argument
Logical opposites
Common weakening scenarios
17. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Premise definition
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
False analogy
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
18. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Main Point Questions
19. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Primary Objective #3
Conclusion definition
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Probability indicators
20. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Numbers and percentage errors
Exceptional case/over generalization
21. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Circular reasoning
How to attack a causal conclusion
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Appeal Fallacies
22. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Quantity indicators
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Mistaken cause and effect
23. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Probability indicators
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
2 speaker questions
Survey errors
24. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Uncertain use of a term or concept
False analogy
Quantity indicators
'Additional' Premise Indicators
25. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
Typical assumption question stems
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Family #2: Help
False analogy
26. 1. if you recognize the form of reasoning used in the stimulus (causal - conditional - etc.) immediately attack the answers and search for the answer with similar reasoning (analogy - circular reasoning) 2. The Conclusion - match the conclusions - to
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Conclusion definition
Method of Reasoning
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
27. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Assumption Negation Technique
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
28. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Numbers and percentage errors
False dilemma
Logical negation
Typical assumption question stems
29. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Main Point Questions
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Conclusion Indicators
30. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Causal statements
Common weakening scenarios
Primary Objective #2
False dilemma
31. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Mistaken Reversal
Conclusion Identification Method
Logical opposites
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
32. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Counter Premise Indicators
Errors of composition and division
Justify the conclusion formula
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
33. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Weakening conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #1
Sufficient Condition
34. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Common weakening scenarios
Logical opposites
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
35. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Logical opposites
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Family #2: Help
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
36. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Justify the conclusion formula
Method of Reasoning
Primary Objective #7
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
37. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Quantity indicators
2 roles played by assumptions
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
38. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Primary Objective #6
How to determine the strength of an argument
Main Point Questions
Primary Objective #1
39. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Main Point Questions
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Method of Reasoning
40. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Common weakening scenarios
Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #3
Typical assumption question stems
41. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
How to strengthen an argument
Straw Man
Premise definition
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
42. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Exceptional case/over generalization
Primary Objective #6
Causal statements
43. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
Primary Objective #4
Primary Objective #9
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
44. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
Family #1: Prove
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Errors of conditional reasoning
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
45. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Common weakening scenarios
46. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Primary Objective #1
Common weakening scenarios
Family #4: Disprove
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
47. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
How to strengthen an argument
Straw Man
2 speaker questions
Primary Objective #9
48. 1. Appeal to authority - uses the opinion of an authority in an attempt to persuade the reader. The flaw is that the authority may not have relevant knowledge or all of the info regarding the situation - to there may be a difference of opinion among
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Appeal Fallacies
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Logical negation
49. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
Conclusion Identification Method
Rules for Family #3
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Counter Premise Indicators
50. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Family #1: Prove
Logical negation
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions