SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Errors of composition and division
Justify the conclusion formula
Logical negation
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
2. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Sufficient Condition
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Counter Premise Indicators
3. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
How to attack a causal conclusion
Primary Objective #2
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
4. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Assumption Negation Technique
Primary Objective #5
Conclusion definition
Uncertain use of a term or concept
5. Always ask: Do the given facts support the conclusion? Do the premises strongly suggest that the conclusion would be true? Does the conclusion feel like an inevitable result of the premises? Or Does the conclusion go beyond the scope of the info in t
Central assumption of causal conclusions
How to determine the strength of an argument
How to strengthen an argument
Primary Objective #9
6. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Logical negation
Necessary Condition
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Primary Objective #5
7. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
2 speaker questions
Mistaken cause and effect
8. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Mistaken Reversal
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Primary Objective #4
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
9. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
10. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Typical assumption question stems
Rules for Family #1
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
11. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Errors of composition and division
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Causal statements
12. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Logical negation
Family #4: Disprove
Counter Premise Indicators
13. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Logical opposites
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Family #2: Help
Errors of conditional reasoning
14. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
Exceptional case/over generalization
Survey errors
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Weakening conditional reasoning
15. 1. Incomplete info. The author fails to consider all of the possibilities or relies upon evidence that is incomplete. This flaw can be attacked by bringing up new possibilities or info. 2. Improper comparison. The author attempts to compare two or mo
How to determine the strength of an argument
Logical negation
Common weakening scenarios
False analogy
16. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Exceptional case/over generalization
Weakening conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #8
'Additional' Premise Indicators
17. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Conclusion definition
Logical opposites
Errors of composition and division
Sufficient Condition
18. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Family #1: Prove
Primary Objective #5
Method of Reasoning
19. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
Rules for Family #3
2 speaker questions
Numbers and percentage errors
Premise definition
20. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Appeal Fallacies
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
21. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Sufficient Condition
Common weakening scenarios
22. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Weakening conditional reasoning
Premise definition
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
How to attack a causal conclusion
23. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Primary Objective #2
Family #2: Help
False analogy
Method of Reasoning
24. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
False analogy
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Common weakening scenarios
Premise Indicators
25. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Family #1: Prove
Conclusion Indicators
Primary Objective #2
Main Point Questions
26. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Primary Objective #6
Family #2: Help
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Primary Objective #3
27. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
Exceptional case/over generalization
2 roles played by assumptions
How to attack a causal conclusion
Rules for Family #1
28. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Main Point Questions
Family #2: Help
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
29. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Rules for Family #2
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Conclusion Identification Method
30. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Primary Objective #5
Appeal Fallacies
31. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Family #3: Hurt
Counter Premise Indicators
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
2 speaker questions
32. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Errors of composition and division
Mistaken cause and effect
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
33. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Primary Objective #1
Mistaken Reversal
2 roles played by assumptions
Counter Premise Indicators
34. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Rules for Family #1
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Rules for Family #3
35. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Causal statements
Mistaken cause and effect
Typical assumption question stems
Rules for Family #2
36. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
How to strengthen an argument
Time shift errors
Family #3: Hurt
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
37. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Survey errors
Primary Objective #9
38. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Central assumption of causal conclusions
False dilemma
Circular reasoning
Primary Objective #1
39. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
False analogy
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Primary Objective #3
40. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
Common weakening scenarios
Errors of composition and division
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
41. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Family #4: Disprove
Appeal Fallacies
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Logical opposites
42. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Numbers and percentage errors
How to attack a causal conclusion
Weaken question signal words
43. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Primary Objective #4
Weakening conditional reasoning
Sufficient Condition
44. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Probability indicators
Mistaken Negation
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
45. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance. because the LSAT is concerned solely with argument forms - a speaker can never validly attack the character or motives or a person; instead - a speaker
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Logical opposites
False analogy
Source argument AKA ad hominen
46. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Errors of conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #7
47. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Quantity indicators
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Rules for Family #1
48. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Family #3: Hurt
Time shift errors
Counter Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #6
49. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Primary Objective #3
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Primary Objective #2
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
50. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Logical negation
Conclusion Indicators
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests