SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Conclusion Indicators
Primary Objective #1
False analogy
Circular reasoning
2. Refer to the amount or quantity in the relationship. Examples: (do not need to memorize) all - every - most - many - several - sole - only - not all - none - few.
Quantity indicators
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Numbers and percentage errors
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
3. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Mistaken Reversal
Assumption Negation Technique
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Source argument AKA ad hominen
4. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
5. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Errors of conditional reasoning
Errors in the use of evidence
Errors of composition and division
Appeal Fallacies
6. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Circular reasoning
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
7. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Primary Objective #1
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Mistaken Negation
Primary Objective #2
8. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Family #1: Prove
Causal statements
2 speaker questions
Probability indicators
9. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
Primary Objective #1
Logical negation
Primary Objective #6
Family #2: Help
10. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Probability indicators
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
11. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Rules for Family #1
How to attack a causal conclusion
Primary Objective #4
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
12. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Main Point Questions
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Source argument AKA ad hominen
13. Think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices. Do not expect to see the exact prephrase - there are too many variations. Make an abstract prephrase then examine each answer to see if it paraphrases the prephrase.n
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Conclusion Indicators
Probability indicators
Straw Man
14. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Straw Man
Conclusion definition
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
15. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Counter Premise Indicators
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
16. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
Primary Objective #3
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
17. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Rules for Family #3
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Conclusion Identification Method
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
18. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Family #2: Help
Time shift errors
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
19. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Main Point Questions
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Primary Objective #3
20. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Mistaken Negation
Weakening conditional reasoning
Errors of composition and division
Primary Objective #5
21. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Typical assumption question stems
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Mistaken Reversal
Premise definition
22. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Source argument AKA ad hominen
2 speaker questions
23. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Time shift errors
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Method of Reasoning
24. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Conclusion Indicators
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Circular reasoning
Counter Premise Indicators
25. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Primary Objective #7
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Premise Indicators
Premise definition
26. Mis-assessing the force of evidence is a frequent error committed by LSAT authors 1. Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that position is false 2. lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove that position is true 3. some evide
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Errors in the use of evidence
Mistaken Negation
Main Point Questions
27. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Method of Reasoning questions
False analogy
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
28. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Family #3: Hurt
Mistaken Reversal
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Assumption Negation Technique
29. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Counter Premise Indicators
Main Point Questions
Causal statements
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
30. Premises + answer choice = conclusion When approaching answers - separate them into winners and losers - then apply the justify formula.
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Family #3: Hurt
Justify the conclusion formula
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
31. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Typical assumption question stems
How to attack a causal conclusion
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
32. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Mistaken Reversal
Primary Objective #1
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Necessary Condition
33. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Method of Reasoning
Rules for Family #1
Probability indicators
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
34. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
Family #3: Hurt
Weaken question signal words
Exceptional case/over generalization
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
35. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #6
2 speaker questions
Method of Reasoning
36. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Weakening conditional reasoning
False analogy
37. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Primary Objective #5
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Quantity indicators
38. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
Mistaken Negation
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
39. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Family #2: Help
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Mistaken cause and effect
40. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Numbers and percentage errors
Conclusion Identification Method
Rules for Family #3
41. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Logical opposites
How to attack a causal conclusion
Primary Objective #8
Uncertain use of a term or concept
42. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
43. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Main Point Questions
Conclusion definition
44. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Conclusion definition
Primary Objective #2
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
45. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
How to strengthen an argument
Causal statements
Premise definition
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
46. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Errors of conditional reasoning
Typical assumption question stems
Family #1: Prove
Common weakening scenarios
47. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
48. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Circular reasoning
Rules for Family #3
Primary Objective #3
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
49. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Primary Objective #3
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Rules for Family #2
Weaken question signal words
50. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Conclusion Indicators
Family #4: Disprove
Family #1: Prove
Typical assumption question stems