SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Quantity indicators
2. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Conclusion definition
Family #2: Help
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
3. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Counter Premise Indicators
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
How to determine the strength of an argument
Errors of composition and division
4. If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus - then that answer is incorrect. Watch for answers that are partially true - that is answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also
Primary Objective #1
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Source argument AKA ad hominen
5. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Quantity indicators
Necessary Condition
6. This type of flawed argument attacks the person (or source) instead of the argument they advance. because the LSAT is concerned solely with argument forms - a speaker can never validly attack the character or motives or a person; instead - a speaker
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Assumption Negation Technique
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Typical assumption question stems
7. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Logical opposites
Appeal Fallacies
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
8. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Mistaken cause and effect
Rules for Family #3
9. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Primary Objective #8
2 speaker questions
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
10. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Errors in the use of evidence
Primary Objective #3
Method of Reasoning questions
Primary Objective #2
11. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Numbers and percentage errors
Family #2: Help
12. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
Family #1: Prove
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
False dilemma
Premise Indicators
13. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
False dilemma
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Premise definition
14. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Weaken question signal words
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
15. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Conclusion definition
Circular reasoning
Mistaken cause and effect
16. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
Premise definition
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Primary Objective #2
17. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Primary Objective #6
False analogy
How to attack a causal conclusion
Primary Objective #5
18. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Conclusion Indicators
Premise definition
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
19. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
Main Point Questions
Conclusion Indicators
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Method of Reasoning
20. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Common weakening scenarios
Causal statements
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
21. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Primary Objective #5
Premise definition
Conclusion Indicators
22. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Family #2: Help
23. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Rules for Family #3
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
24. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Straw Man
Rules for Family #3
Premise Indicators
Counter Premise Indicators
25. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Mistaken Negation
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Common weakening scenarios
26. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
2 roles played by assumptions
Conclusion Identification Method
Primary Objective #1
27. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Quantity indicators
2 speaker questions
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Central assumption of causal conclusions
28. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Primary Objective #3
Rules for Family #1
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
29. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Primary Objective #4
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
30. Allows you to decide between contenders or to confirm that the answer you have chosen is correct. 1. Logically negate the answer choices under consideration. Usually consists of taking a 'not' out of a sentence or putting a 'not' in a sentence. 2. Th
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Assumption Negation Technique
How to strengthen an argument
Family #3: Hurt
31. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Primary Objective #9
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
32. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Errors of conditional reasoning
Time shift errors
Weakening conditional reasoning
Logical negation
33. Occurs when the author uses an analogy that is two disimilar to the original situation to be applicable. n
False analogy
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
34. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Straw Man
Primary Objective #5
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Time shift errors
35. 1. The stem uses the word assumption - presupposition or some variation 2. The stem NEVER uses the word 'if' or any other sufficient condition indicator. The stem will likely contain a necessary condition indicator such as required or unless. The cor
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Typical assumption question stems
Counter Premise Indicators
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
36. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
How to attack a causal conclusion
Main Point Questions
Primary Objective #2
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
37. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
38. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Primary Objective #8
How to determine the strength of an argument
Errors of composition and division
'Additional' Premise Indicators
39. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Source argument AKA ad hominen
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
40. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Family #3: Hurt
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Survey errors
41. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
Survey errors
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
'Additional' Premise Indicators
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
42. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
Sufficient Condition
Family #4: Disprove
Conclusion definition
Mistaken Negation
43. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Family #3: Hurt
Exceptional case/over generalization
Circular reasoning
Family #1: Prove
44. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Common weakening scenarios
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
How to determine the strength of an argument
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
45. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Family #2: Help
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
46. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
47. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Family #1: Prove
Family #3: Hurt
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
48. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Method of Reasoning questions
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Quantity indicators
49. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Probability indicators
Straw Man
Primary Objective #4
Logical opposites
50. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Straw Man
Survey errors
Necessary Condition
Words used to introduce numerical ideas