SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Conclusion Identification Method
Premise Indicators
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
2. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Rules for Family #2
How to determine the strength of an argument
Justify the conclusion formula
Primary Objective #8
3. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
4. Stimulus (affected or determined) ---> answer choices (accepted) AKA: Help Family assumption - justify the conclusion - strengthen/support - resolve the paradox.
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Family #2: Help
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Weaken question signal words
5. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Numbers and percentage errors
Family #1: Prove
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
False dilemma
6. A. Eliminate any alternate causes for the stated effect. B. Show that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs. C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect does not occur. D. Eliminate the possility that the stated relationship is revers
How to attack a causal conclusion
Justify the conclusion formula
Assumption Negation Technique
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
7. 1. Whatever term is modified by 'unless' - 'except' - 'until' or 'without' becomes the necessary condition 2. The remaining term is negated and becomes the sufficient condition.
Straw Man
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Primary Objective #5
Central assumption of causal conclusions
8. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Errors of conditional reasoning
Method of Reasoning
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Source argument AKA ad hominen
9. They can be in the premises or conclusion. If they are in the conclusion the argument is flawed. Classic mistaken cause and effect reasoning refers to occurences when a causal assertion is made in the conclusion or the conclusion presumes a causal re
Mistaken Negation
Necessary Condition
Causal statements
Primary Objective #4
10. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Primary Objective #1
Assumption Negation Technique
11. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
2 speaker questions
Mistaken cause and effect
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Family #2: Help
12. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Assumption Negation Technique
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Main Point Questions
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
13. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
Main Point Questions
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Primary Objective #8
Exceptional case/over generalization
14. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Rules for Family #1
Primary Objective #3
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
15. Occurs when an author attempts to attack an opponent's position by ignoring the actual statements made by the opposing speaker and instead distorts and refashions the argument - making it weaker in the process. Often prephrased by 'what you're saying
Probability indicators
Straw Man
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Uncertain use of a term or concept
16. 1. No conclusion. When a stimulus does not have a conclusion and contains a paradox - expect a Resolve question 2. Language of contradiction exp: but - however - yet - although - paradoxically - surprisingly.
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
2 roles played by assumptions
Weakening conditional reasoning
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
17. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Primary Objective #6
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Primary Objective #3
Main Point Questions
18. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Mistaken Reversal
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Time shift errors
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
19. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Appeal Fallacies
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Quantity indicators
20. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Errors in the use of evidence
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Rules for Family #3
21. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Weakening conditional reasoning
Common weakening scenarios
Premise definition
22. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
False analogy
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Family #1: Prove
23. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Errors of composition and division
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
24. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
Rules for Family #3
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Premise Indicators
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
25. 1. Increasing percentages automatically lead to increasing numbers. This is not necessarily true because the overall size of the group could get smaller. 2. Decreasing percentages automatically lead to decreasing numbers 3. Increasing numbers automat
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
26. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Logical opposites
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
2 roles played by assumptions
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
27. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Family #4: Disprove
Primary Objective #7
Premise Indicators
28. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Primary Objective #7
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Primary Objective #8
Necessary Condition
29. Negates both conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Negation: Not A+ --> Not Study
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Mistaken Negation
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
30. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Logical negation
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
31. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Errors in the use of evidence
Numbers and percentage errors
Primary Objective #2
Rules for Family #1
32. 1. Any 'new' element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer. 2. Elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one premise normally do not appear in the correct answer. 3. Elements that appear in the premises but not the conclus
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
33. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Primary Objective #4
Primary Objective #3
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
34. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Errors of composition and division
Conclusion definition
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
35. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
Logical opposites
Primary Objective #5
2 speaker questions
Family #4: Disprove
36. Stimulus (accepted) --/-> answer choices (affected or determined) cannot be true.
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Rules for Family #1
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Family #4: Disprove
37. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Conclusion Indicators
2 roles played by assumptions
Mistaken Reversal
Rules for Family #2
38. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Primary Objective #2
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Family #1: Prove
39. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Mistaken Reversal
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Premise Indicators
40. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
Method of Reasoning questions
Method of Reasoning
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
How to attack a causal conclusion
41. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
2 speaker questions
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
How to strengthen an argument
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
42. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Source argument AKA ad hominen
43. 1. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present and depending on the question - you will help shore up the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. Your task
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Rules for Family #2
Appeal Fallacies
44. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Time shift errors
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Primary Objective #4
45. Then - only - only if - must - required - unless - except - until - without.
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Errors in the use of evidence
Rules for Family #1
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
46. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
How to attack a causal conclusion
Appeal Fallacies
Survey errors
False dilemma
47. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
'Additional' Premise Indicators
Conclusion definition
Method of Reasoning
Mistaken cause and effect
48. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Weakening conditional reasoning
Family #3: Hurt
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
49. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Family #1: Prove
False dilemma
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
50. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
Primary Objective #9
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Common weakening scenarios
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions