SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Family #4: Disprove
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
2. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Numbers and percentage errors
Primary Objective #2
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Central assumption of causal conclusions
3. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements. MUST recognize whether a conclusion is present.
Primary Objective #2
Primary Objective #1
Mistaken Negation
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
4. 1. The stimulus will almost always contain an argument you must identify - isolate and assess the premises and the conclusion of the argument 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct answer choices impact the conclusion 3. The info in the stimu
Rules for Family #1
Typical assumption question stems
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
5. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
How to attack a causal conclusion
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Time shift errors
6. 1. An indication that the answer choices should be accepted as true 2. Keywords that indicate your task is to resolve the problem Action: Problem: Resolve Paradox Explain Contradiction Reconcile Discrepancy Conflict Puzzle *Attempt to prephrase Corre
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
Family #2: Help
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
7. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Necessary Condition
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Logical opposites
8. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Mistaken Reversal
Numbers and percentages Common misconceptions
9. 1. if you recognize the form of reasoning used in the stimulus (causal - conditional - etc.) immediately attack the answers and search for the answer with similar reasoning (analogy - circular reasoning) 2. The Conclusion - match the conclusions - to
Justify the conclusion formula
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Rules for Family #3
10. Supporter - the traditional linking role - where an assumption connects pieces of the argument. (often new or rogue pieces) They also can close gaps. Ex: All male citizens of athens had the right to vote. Therefore - Socrates had the right to vote in
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Counter Premise Indicators
Typical assumption question stems
2 roles played by assumptions
11. 1. You must accept the stimulus info- even if it contains an error in reasoning-and use it to prove one of the answer choices must be true. 2. Any info in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus or as a combination of it
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
Rules for Family #1
Weakening conditional reasoning
12. If - when - whenever - every - all - any - people who - in order to.
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Method of Reasoning questions
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
Conclusion definition
13. The author assumes as true What is supposed to be proved. exp: 'this essay is the best because it is better than all the others'n
Primary Objective #1
Prephrasing Method of Reasoning questions
Circular reasoning
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
14. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
False analogy
Family #2: Help
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Primary Objective #3
15. 1. The survey uses a biased sample 2. The survey questions are improperly constructed 3. Respondents to the survey give inaccurate responses. People do not always tell the truth when responding to surveys.n
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Survey errors
Rules for Family #2
16. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Family #3: Hurt
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Mistaken Negation
17. Stimulus (affected or determined)--/-> answer choices (accepted) Negative sign on the arrow reflects attacking or hurting the argument (weaken).
Family #3: Hurt
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
the unless equation (conditional reasoning)
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
18. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Necessary Condition
19. Usually have one male and one female. The female uses sound reasoning and the male uses flawed reasoning or makes a mistake. This is not always true - but more often than not.n
Family #1: Prove
Survey errors
Method of Reasoning questions
2 speaker questions
20. As an argument progresses - the author must use each term in a constant - coherent fashion. using a term in different ways is inherently confusing and undermines the integrity of the argument. n
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Primary Objective #7
Uncertain use of a term or concept
Conclusion definition
21. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Primary Objective #8
Family #3: Hurt
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
22. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Conclusion Indicators
False dilemma
23. Authors misuses info to such a degree that they fail to provide any info to support their conclusion or they provide info that is irrelevant to their conclusion. n
Necessary Condition
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
24. 1. Stimulus will contain an argument. Must isolate and identify and assess the premises and the conclusion. 2. Focus on the conclusion. Almost all correct Weaken answers impact the conclusion. 3. The info in the stimulus is suspect. There are often r
Family #4: Disprove
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Premise Indicators
25. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Appeal Fallacies
Mistaken cause and effect
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
26. Introduce something that actually contains an idea that is counter to the argument. By raising opposition - the author can minimize the damage that would be done by the objection if it were raised elsewhere. but yet - however - on the other hand - ad
Numbers and percentage errors
How to determine the strength of an argument
Straw Man
Counter Premise Indicators
27. Carefully read and identify the question stem. DO NOT assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain questions types.
False analogy
Primary Objective #1
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Primary Objective #5
28. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Rules for Family #1
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Primary Objective #8
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
29. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
30. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Weaken question signal words
Typical assumption question stems
Primary Objective #7
How to determine the strength of an argument
31. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Rules for Family #3
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
Mistaken Reversal
Family #4: Disprove
32. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. DO NOT GENERALIZE!.
Weaken question signal words
Primary Objective #4
Primary Objective #6
Weakening conditional reasoning
33. To weaken a conditional conclusion - attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order for the sufficient condition to occur. With a combo of a conditional reasoning stimulus and a weaken question
Primary Objective #1
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Weakening conditional reasoning
Justify the conclusion formula
34. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Necessary Condition
Conclusion definition
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
35. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Probability indicators
Mistaken Reversal
Primary Objective #8
36. To logically negate a conditional statement - negate the necessary condition. Example: neither...nor becomes either...or.
Mistaken Reversal
Primary Objective #7
Logical negation
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
37. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
Main Point Questions
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Conclusion Indicators
Primary Objective #5
38. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Causal statements
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Fact test for Method of Reasoning questions
Premise Indicators
39. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Sufficient Condition
Errors of conditional reasoning
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Rules for Family #3
40. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
'Additional' Premise Indicators
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Probability indicators
Primary Objective #6
41. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Family #1: Prove
Mistaken cause and effect
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
How to strengthen an argument
42. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Conclusion Identification Method
Necessary Condition
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
43. Occurs when an author improperly equates a percentage with a definate quantity or vice versa. n
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Mistaken Negation
Sufficient Condition
Numbers and percentage errors
44. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Errors in the use of evidence
Probability indicators
45. Always ask: Do the given facts support the conclusion? Do the premises strongly suggest that the conclusion would be true? Does the conclusion feel like an inevitable result of the premises? Or Does the conclusion go beyond the scope of the info in t
How to determine the strength of an argument
How to strengthen an argument
Survey errors
Fundamental rules for strengthen - justify the conclusion and assumption questions
46. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
Weaken question signal words
Primary Objective #4
Method of Reasoning
47. They h ave failed to fully and accurately identify the conclusion of the argument. If a conclusion is present - you MUST identify it prior to proceeding on to the question stem.
Appeal Fallacies
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
What is the biggest reason students miss questions?
Primary Objective #6
48. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Logical opposites
Conclusion Identification Method
Rules for Family #1
Sufficient Condition
49. 1. You can use only the info in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice 2. Any answer choice that describes an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect Method of Reasoning questions use a variety of formats - bu
Errors of conditional reasoning
Method of Reasoning questions
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
50. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
Conclusion Indicators
Primary Objective #4
Mistaken Reversal
Typical assumption question stems