SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
LSAT Logical Reasoning Clues
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
logic-and-reasoning
,
LSAT
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Because - since - for - for example - for the reason that - in that - given that - as indicated by - due to - owing to - this can be seen from - we know this by.
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Family #3: Hurt
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
Premise Indicators
2. A statement or judgement that follows from one or more reasons. Ask: What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What point follows from the others?
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Typical assumption question stems
Conclusion definition
False dilemma
3. The mistake involves assuming that conditions will remain constant over time - and that what was the case in the past will be the case in the future or present. n
Central assumption of causal conclusions
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Common weakening scenarios
Time shift errors
4. 1. Identify the conclusion - this is what you are trying to strengthen 2. Personalize the argument 3. Look for weaknesses in the argument 4. Arguments that contain analogies or use surveys rely upon the validity of those analogies and surveys. Answer
Mistaken Reversal
Family #3: Hurt
How to strengthen an argument
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
5. 1. The info in the stimulus is supect. There are often reasoning errors present - and you will further weaken the argument in some way. 2. The answer choices are accepted as given - even if they include 'new' info. The task is to determine which answ
How to strengthen an argument
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Rules for Family #3
Conclusion Indicators
6. Assumes that only 2 courses of action are available when there may be others. n
Premise Indicators
False dilemma
Main Point Questions
Common features of Resolve the Paradox
7. Takes a small number of intstances and treats those instances as if they support a broad - sweeping conclusion. Often appears as an incorrect answer.n
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Exceptional case/over generalization
Logical opposites
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
8. 1. If conditional statements are linked together in the argument - the correct answer choice for an assumption question will typically supply a missing link in the chain or the contrapositive to that link. 2. If you see a conditional conclusion and t
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Premise definition
Family #3: Hurt
Primary Objective #7
9. 1. Watch for answers starting with the phrase 'at least one' or 'at least some'. When an assumption answer choice starts with one of these phrases it is usually right. But ALWAYS verify with A.N.T. 2. Avoid answers that claim an idea was the most imp
Conclusion definition
Weakening conditional reasoning
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
10. Quantity: All = 100 Not all = 0-99 Some = 1-100 None = 0 Time: Always - Not always - Sometimes - Never Space: Everywhere - Not everywhere - Somewhere - No where.
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Logical opposites
Circular reasoning
Errors of conditional reasoning
11. Used to introduce other premises that support the conclusion but are sometimes non-essential to the conclusion furthermore - moreover - besides - in addition - whats more - after all.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
12. Mistaken negation and reversal exp: taking the non-existence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist' (MN) 'mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it' (MR)n
Sufficient Condition
Errors of conditional reasoning
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
Family #4: Disprove
13. Argument Part - If you do see the main conclusion at the end of a Method-AP problem - be prepared to answer a question about a part of the arguement other than the conclusion.n
Central assumption of causal conclusions
Exceptional case/over generalization
How to strengthen an argument
Method of Reasoning
14. A. Eliminates an alternate cause for the stated effect B. Shows that when the cause occurs - the effect occurs - assumption answers affirm the cause/effect relationship C. Show that when the cause does not occur - the effect doe not occur D. Eliminat
Primary Objective #8
Family #2: Help
Sufficient Condition
Assumptions and causality: typical correct answer categories
15. An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
Conclusion Indicators
Logical negation
Sufficient Condition
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
16. A fact - proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made. Ask: What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this argument? What evidence exists?
Causal statements
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Method of Reasoning
Premise definition
17. Switches the elements in the sufficient and necessary conditions - creating a statement that does not have to be true. Given: A+ --> Study Mistaken Reversal: Study --> A+.
Mistaken Reversal
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
Conclusion Indicators
18. To weaken a conditional conclusion - attack the necessary condition by showing that the necessary condition does not need to occur in order for the sufficient condition to occur. With a combo of a conditional reasoning stimulus and a weaken question
Common weakening scenarios
Weakening conditional reasoning
Assumption Negation Technique
Justify the conclusion formula
19. 1. The stem uses the word strengthen or a synonym (support - helps - most justifies) 2. The stem indicates that you should accept the answer choices are true.
Conclusion Identification Method
Premise Indicators
Weakening conditional reasoning
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
20. Stimulus (accepted) ----> Answer Choices (affected or determined) AKA: must be or prove family must be true - main point - point at issue - method of reasoning - flaw in the reasoning - parallel reasoning.
Family #1: Prove
Straw Man
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
21. Caused by because of responsible for reason for leads to induced by promoted by determined by produced by product of played a role in was a factor in is an effect of.
Words used to introduce cause and effect relationships. (memorize)
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Things to remember in regards to WEAKEN questions
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
22. 1. Opposite answers. These answers do the exact opposite of What is needed. 2. Shell game answers. Occurs when an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choices - but the idea is changed just enou
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Conclusion Identification Method
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
23. 1. assuming a causal relationship on the basis of the sequence of events 2. assuming a causal relationship when only a correlation exists 3. failure to consider an alternate cause for the effect or an alternate cause for both the cause and the effect
Straw Man
Rules for Family #3
Mistaken cause and effect
Errors in the use of evidence
24. Thus - therefore - hence - consequently - as a result - so - accordingly - clearly - must be that - shows that - conclude that - follows that - for this reason.
Conclusion Indicators
Primary Objective #8
Solving Parallel Reasoning questions in the order stated
Main Point Questions
25. 1. new element answers - an answer that describes something that did not occure or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct 2. Half right - half wrong answers - LSAT makers like to start off with something that happened - then end w
Incorrect Method of Reasoning answers
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
26. Amount - quantity - sum - total - count - tally.n
Words used to introduce numerical ideas
Family #3: Hurt
Errors of conditional reasoning
Numbers and percentage errors
27. 1. Stem uses the word 'if' or another sufficient indicator 2. Stem uses the phrase 'allows the conclusion to be properly drawn' or 'enables the conclusion to be properly drawn'. 3. Stem does not lessen the degree of justification. Never uses 'most ju
Premise Indicators
How to identify Justify the Conclusion questions
Counter Premise Indicators
Rules for Family #3
28. Always read each of the five answer choices. If an answer choice appears somewhat attractive - interesting or even confusing - keep it as a contender and move to the next answer.
Primary Objective #7
Necessary Condition
Rules for Family #3
Resolve the Paradox question stem features
29. To raise a viewpoint at the beginning of the stimulus and then disagree with it immediately thereafter. The stimulus often begins with: Some people claim... Some people propose... Many people believe... Some argue that... Some critics claim... Some s
2 roles played by assumptions
Counter Premise Indicators
One of the most commonly used stimulus structures is what? How are they recognized?
Numbers and percentage errors
30. 1. Incomplete info. The author fails to consider all of the possibilities or relies upon evidence that is incomplete. This flaw can be attacked by bringing up new possibilities or info. 2. Improper comparison. The author attempts to compare two or mo
Common weakening scenarios
Family #2: Help
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Logical negation
31. If all 5 answer choices appear to be 'losers' - return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument.
Primary Objective #9
Strengthen questions ask you to identify the answer choice that best supports the argument. 2 common features
Circular reasoning
Source argument AKA ad hominen
32. If the stimulus contains an argument - determine whether the argument is strong or weak.
Weaken question signal words
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
Premise Indicators
Primary Objective #3
33. Whenever you identify a causal relationship in the conclusion of an LSAT problem - immediately prepare to either weaken or strengthen the argument. Tasks for Weaken questions...must always identify a causal conclusion. Then ask if there relationship
Numbers and percentage errors
How to attack a causal conclusion
False analogy
Words used to introduce a sufficient condition
34. Involves judgements made about groups and parts of a group. an error or composition occurs when the author attributes a characteristic of part of the group to the group as a whole or to each member of the group Error of division - author attributes c
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Primary Objective #5
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Errors of composition and division
35. Refer to the likelihood of occurence or the obligation present - as in 'The mayor should resign.' 'the law will never pass.' Examples: (do not need to memorize) must - will - always - not always - probably - likely - would - never - rarely - could -
Probability indicators
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
Counter Premise Indicators
Weakening conditional reasoning
36. Prephrase: after reading the question stem - take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
Typical assumption question stems
Primary Objective #6
How to solve Justify questions mechanistically
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
37. An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
Primary Objective #2
Uncertain use of a term or concept
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Necessary Condition
38. They often feature 2 conclusions (main and sub.) - when the main conclusion is typically place in the first or second sentence and the last sentence contains the sub. conclusion. The sub. conclusion is set off by conclusion indicators while the main
Assumptions and conditionality: the two types of answer choices normally produced are?
Sufficient Condition
LSAT Conclusion trick for Method AP questions
Central assumption of causal conclusions
39. If the stimulus contains an argument - identify the conclusion. If the stimulus contains a fact set - examine each fact.
Exceptional case/over generalization
Primary Objective #2
How to strengthen an argument
Primary Objective #9
40. Occurs when an author makes conflicting statements. n
Exceptional case/over generalization
Primary Objective #9
Internal contradiction AKA self contradiction
Errors of conditional reasoning
41. The makers of the LSAT do not think that there are multiple causes for the same effect. When an LSAT speaker concludes that one occurance caused another - that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and th
2 roles played by assumptions
Time shift errors
3 incorrect answer traps (weaken)
Central assumption of causal conclusions
42. 1. The sufficient condition does not make the necessary condition occur. That is - the sufficient condition does not actively cause the necessary condition to happen. 2. Temporally speaking - either condition can occur first - or the two conditions c
Circular reasoning
3 logical features of conditional reasoning
Logical negation
Numbers and percentage errors
43. At least on of the two - possibly both.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
44. Separate the answer choices into 'contenders' and 'loser'. After completing this process - review the contenders and decide which answer correct.
Primary Objective #8
Source argument AKA ad hominen
Errors in the use of evidence
Common weakening scenarios
45. 1. ethical versus factual situations - when the stimulus addresses something ethical - a factual answer would be incorrect and vice versa 2. dual agreement or dual disagreement - often incorrect answer choices will supply statements that both speaker
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Primary Objective #8
Weaken question signal words
Incorrect answers in Point at Issue questions
46. Percent - proportion - fraction - ratio - incidence - likelihood - probability - segment - share. n
Words used to introduce percentage ideas
Primary Objective #4
Survey errors
Straw Man
47. Take the statements under consideration and place them in an arrangement that forces once to be the conclusion and the other(s) to be the premise (s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged - determine
Rules for Family #1
Typical assumption question stems
Time shift errors
Conclusion Identification Method
48. First Family The correct answer choice will be a rephrasing of the main conclusion of the argument. The conclusion is either in the middle or beginning of the stimulus. The correct answer choice must not only be true it also must summarize the author
LSAT Definition of 'either/or'
Words used to introduce a necessary condition
Main Point Questions
Method of Reasoning
49. Immediately look for the repeat or contrapositive in the answer choices. Avoid mistaken reversals and mistaken negations.
Justify the conclusion formula
Probability indicators
What to do when a stimulus that contains conditional reasoning is combined with a must be true question stem
How to approach causality and strengthen questions?
50. Weaken - attack - undermine - refute - argue against - call into question - cast doubt - challenge - damage - counter - When evaluating answers ask yourself: 'Would this answer choice make the author reconsider his position or force the author to res
Weaken question signal words
3 quirks of assumption question answer choices
General lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion
Primary Objective #4