SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Out of the box thinking
partnership model
divergent thinking
social striving
tunnel vision
2. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
unbundling
contingency contracts
problem solving model
cognitive route
3. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
common identity groups
setting limits
barrier to agreement
relationship issues
4. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
communication in negotiaion
barrier to agreement
commitment
reflections
5. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
gamblers fallacy
social striving
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
GRIP goals
6. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
inert knowledge problem
brainwriting
divergent thinking
affective route
7. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
Particularism
illusory correlation
walk away alternative
irritators
8. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
gamblers fallacy
flower child negotiator
impossibilty theorem
multiparty negotiations
9. What you say you want - your solution
cognitive route
a position in negotiation
integrative negotiation
communication in negotiaion
10. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
integrative negotiation
barrier to agreement
illusion of transparecy
false conflict or illusory conflict
11. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
integrative negotiation
ways to generate options to a problem
key steps in integrative negotiation
options
12. Proceed towards one answer
commitment
non-verbal attending
convergent thinking
Particularism
13. Members who are attracted to particular members
premature consessions
gamblers fallacy
common bond groups
verbal minimal encouragers
14. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
endowment effect
errors that prevent agreement
illusion of transparecy
dispositional attribution
15. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
impossibilty theorem
premature consessions
ways to generate options to a problem
non-verbal attending
16. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
key steps in integrative negotiation
divergent thinking
commitment
barrier to agreement
17. One that calls into question anothers character
cognitive route
dispositional attribution
errors that prevent agreement
inductive reasoning
18. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
base rates
endowment effect
multiphase negotiations
an interest in negotiation
19. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
barrier to agreement
problem solving model
an interest in negotiation
knowledge based trust
20. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
GRIP goals
perseverance effect
impossibilty theorem
brainwriting
21. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
identification based trust
relationship issues
key components in Negotiation
flower child negotiator
22. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
barrier to agreement
common identity groups
relevant polarity framing
inductive reasoning
23. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
endowment effect
gamblers fallacy
defend/attack spirals
verbal minimal encouragers
24. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
reciprocity principle
errors that prevent agreement
multiparty negotiations
illusory correlation
25. The strenght of positive relations within a team
seller status framing
defend/attack spirals
knowledge based trust
cohension
26. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
unbundling
cohension
sunk cost framing
distributive negotiations
27. Working less hard in a group
active listening
inert knowledge problem
social loafing
perseverance effect
28. See invalid correlations between events
sequence planning
irritators
illusory correlation
relationship issues
29. Members who are attracted to the group
nonspecific compensation
common identity groups
horizon thinkng
setting limits
30. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
logrolling
relevant polarity framing
multiparty negotiations
sequence vs. issue planning
31. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
inductive reasoning
joint gain
gamblers fallacy
distributive negotiations
32. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
sequence planning
circular logrolli
sunk cost framing
premature consessions
33. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
convergent thinking
key components in Negotiation
flower child negotiator
34. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
exploration of options
illusion of transparecy
pivotal power
options
35. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
ways to generate options to a problem
individual collectivism
multiparty negotiations
reciprocity principle
36. Expand the amount of available resources
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
integrative negotiation
multiparty negotiations
an interest in negotiation
37. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
social striving
individual collectivism
options
deterrence based trust
38. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
relevant polarity framing
distributive negotiations
reciprocity principle
seller status framing
39. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
reflections
non-verbal attending
individual collectivism
relationship issues
40. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
legitimacy
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
functional fixedness
old fashioned negotiator
41. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
social loafing
defend/attack spirals
enlightened negotiator
inductive reasoning
42. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
seller status framing
multiparty negotiations
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
verbal minimal encouragers
43. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
integrative negotiation
argument dilution
sequence vs. issue planning
44. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
multiparty negotiations
commitment
verbal minimal encouragers
key components in Negotiation
45. Clients are treated like partners
partnership model
common bond groups
equal concession negotiaitor
nonspecific compensation
46. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
irritators
setting limits
deductive reasoning
unbundling
47. Making projections about future outcomes
social loafing
illusion of transparecy
key components in Negotiation
horizon thinkng
48. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
impossibilty theorem
defend/attack spirals
inert knowledge problem
social loafing
49. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
an interest in negotiation
errors that prevent agreement
false conflict or illusory conflict
options
50. Working harder in a group
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
social striving
common bond groups
illusory correlation