SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
argument dilution
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
sunk cost framing
multiparty negotiations
2. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
contingency contracts
BATNA
ZOPA
joint gain
3. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
old fashioned negotiator
integrative negotiation
deterrence based trust
sunk cost framing
4. Based on intuition and emotion
affective route
key steps in integrative negotiation
functional fixedness
a position in negotiation
5. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
barrier to agreement
relevant polarity framing
distributive negotiations
inductive reasoning
6. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
integrative negotiation
old fashioned negotiator
impossibilty theorem
flower child negotiator
7. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
communication in negotiaion
GRIP goals
Particularism
inductive reasoning
8. Proceed towards one answer
convergent thinking
relevant polarity framing
defend/attack spirals
impossibilty theorem
9. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
reflections
common bond groups
illusion of transparecy
seller status framing
10. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
individual collectivism
flower child negotiator
active listening activities
gamblers fallacy
11. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
knowledge based trust
false conflict or illusory conflict
non-verbal attending
illusory correlation
12. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
walk away alternative
exploration of options
active listening
base rates
13. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
walk away alternative
sequence planning
active listening
base rates
14. Clients are treated like partners
an interest in negotiation
reciprocity principle
key components in Negotiation
partnership model
15. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
relationship issues
false conflict or illusory conflict
setting limits
premature consessions
16. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
gamblers fallacy
sequence vs. issue planning
partnership model
brainwriting
17. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
pivotal power
sunk cost framing
common bond groups
an interest in negotiation
18. Members who are attracted to particular members
common bond groups
base rates
enlightened negotiator
ZOPA
19. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
functional fixedness
verbal minimal encouragers
reservation price
key steps in integrative negotiation
20. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
aspect ratio framing
contingency contracts
argument dilution
social striving
21. The union of both parties issue sets
problem solving model
issue mix
aspect ratio framing
cognitive route
22. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
key steps in integrative negotiation
illusion of transparecy
base rates
23. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
Particularism
setting limits
errors that prevent agreement
sunk cost framing
24. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
circular logrolli
relationship issues
illusory correlation
multiphase negotiations
25. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
inert knowledge problem
pivotal power
nonspecific compensation
26. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
non-verbal attending
relationship issues
errors that prevent agreement
ways to generate options to a problem
27. Working less hard in a group
inert knowledge problem
social loafing
illusion of transparecy
integrative negotiation
28. Out of the box thinking
key components in Negotiation
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
divergent thinking
key steps in integrative negotiation
29. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
reflections
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
BATNA
argument dilution
30. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
options
key steps in integrative negotiation
irritators
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
31. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
sequence planning
walk away alternative
integrative negotiation
individual collectivism
32. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
contingency contracts
identification based trust
deductive reasoning
social loafing
33. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
brainwriting
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
defend/attack spirals
errors that prevent agreement
34. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
illusion of transparecy
horizon thinkng
irritators
inert knowledge problem
35. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
barrier to agreement
enlightened negotiator
tunnel vision
key steps in integrative negotiation
36. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
walk away alternative
integrative negotiation
illusion of transparecy
divergent thinking
37. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
partnership model
affective route
nonspecific compensation
GRIP goals
38. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
a position in negotiation
enlightened negotiator
ZOPA
reservation price
39. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
problem solving model
reservation price
divergent thinking
nonspecific compensation
40. Means by which people influence others
dispositional attribution
egalitarianism hierarchy
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
a position in negotiation
41. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
brainwriting
egalitarianism hierarchy
problem solving model
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
42. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
problem solving model
verbal minimal encouragers
deductive reasoning
circular logrolli
43. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
legitimacy
setting limits
enlightened negotiator
illusory correlation
44. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
distributive negotiations
identification based trust
inductive reasoning
cognitive route
45. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
enlightened negotiator
base rates
verbal minimal encouragers
exploration of options
46. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
horizon thinkng
relationship issues
contingency contracts
tunnel vision
47. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
old fashioned negotiator
perseverance effect
false conflict or illusory conflict
sequence planning
48. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
walk away alternative
circular logrolli
multiparty negotiations
setting limits
49. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
a position in negotiation
affective route
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
50. Members who are attracted to the group
setting limits
impossibilty theorem
brainwriting
common identity groups