SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
integrative negotiation
problem solving model
unbundling
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
2. Working harder in a group
issue mix
social striving
convergent thinking
errors that prevent agreement
3. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
knowledge based trust
commitment
seller status framing
4. Based on intuition and emotion
nonspecific compensation
affective route
joint gain
defend/attack spirals
5. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
communication in negotiaion
inert knowledge problem
BATNA
key steps in integrative negotiation
6. What you really care about - wants needs etc
knowledge based trust
an interest in negotiation
enlightened negotiator
argument dilution
7. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
nonspecific compensation
sequence planning
flower child negotiator
Particularism
8. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
key steps in integrative negotiation
old fashioned negotiator
premature consessions
joint gain
9. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
walk away alternative
legitimacy
integrative negotiation
pivotal power
10. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
walk away alternative
key components in Negotiation
individual collectivism
options
11. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
relevant polarity framing
reciprocity principle
key steps in integrative negotiation
options
12. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
illusion of transparecy
joint gain
seller status framing
deductive reasoning
13. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
tunnel vision
egalitarianism hierarchy
seller status framing
ways to generate options to a problem
14. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
affective route
contingency contracts
premature consessions
unbundling
15. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
tunnel vision
illusory correlation
sunk cost framing
active listening
16. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
social loafing
endowment effect
false conflict or illusory conflict
logrolling
17. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
errors that prevent agreement
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
sequence planning
dispositional attribution
18. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
GRIP goals
integrative negotiation
exploration of options
19. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
inert knowledge problem
sequence planning
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
unbundling
20. Members who are attracted to the group
GRIP goals
seller status framing
common identity groups
multiphase negotiations
21. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
a position in negotiation
relevant polarity framing
false conflict or illusory conflict
inert knowledge problem
22. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
a position in negotiation
argument dilution
setting limits
irritators
23. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
impossibilty theorem
common bond groups
key components in Negotiation
integrative negotiation
24. The strenght of positive relations within a team
inductive reasoning
cohension
active listening activities
Particularism
25. Means by which people influence others
illusion of transparecy
key steps in integrative negotiation
ZOPA
egalitarianism hierarchy
26. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
errors that prevent agreement
non-verbal attending
barrier to agreement
nonspecific compensation
27. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
equal concession negotiaitor
relationship issues
sequence vs. issue planning
ZOPA
28. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
false conflict or illusory conflict
walk away alternative
inductive reasoning
circular logrolli
29. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
brainwriting
contingency contracts
individual collectivism
logrolling
30. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
a position in negotiation
legitimacy
seller status framing
common identity groups
31. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
gamblers fallacy
premature consessions
convergent thinking
reciprocity principle
32. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
flower child negotiator
barrier to agreement
Particularism
endowment effect
33. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
communication in negotiaion
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
ways to generate options to a problem
34. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
GRIP goals
cognitive route
key components in Negotiation
35. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
brainwriting
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
integrative negotiation
problem solving model
36. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
egalitarianism hierarchy
social striving
perseverance effect
37. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
multiphase negotiations
exploration of options
irritators
affective route
38. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
Particularism
gamblers fallacy
functional fixedness
defend/attack spirals
39. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
contingency contracts
brainwriting
flower child negotiator
distributive negotiations
40. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
seller status framing
social striving
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
flower child negotiator
41. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
relevant polarity framing
perseverance effect
egalitarianism hierarchy
42. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
cohension
relationship issues
convergent thinking
aspect ratio framing
43. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
individual collectivism
base rates
sequence vs. issue planning
unbundling
44. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
illusion of transparecy
deterrence based trust
a position in negotiation
seller status framing
45. The union of both parties issue sets
issue mix
premature consessions
active listening activities
reservation price
46. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
integrative negotiation
setting limits
cohension
functional fixedness
47. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
circular logrolli
enlightened negotiator
brainwriting
base rates
48. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
cohension
inductive reasoning
inert knowledge problem
communication in negotiaion
49. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
brainwriting
irritators
inert knowledge problem
a position in negotiation
50. Working less hard in a group
identification based trust
defend/attack spirals
joint gain
social loafing