SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
communication in negotiaion
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
knowledge based trust
circular logrolli
2. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
social loafing
gamblers fallacy
integrative negotiation
3. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
multiphase negotiations
sequence vs. issue planning
barrier to agreement
social striving
4. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
inductive reasoning
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
relationship issues
multiphase negotiations
5. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
a position in negotiation
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
perseverance effect
ways to generate options to a problem
6. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
seller status framing
argument dilution
inductive reasoning
identification based trust
7. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
base rates
GRIP goals
inductive reasoning
legitimacy
8. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
multiparty negotiations
walk away alternative
sequence planning
relevant polarity framing
9. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
unbundling
defend/attack spirals
contingency contracts
relationship issues
10. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
setting limits
old fashioned negotiator
active listening activities
horizon thinkng
11. Members who are attracted to the group
common identity groups
affective route
ways to generate options to a problem
cohension
12. The strenght of positive relations within a team
key steps in integrative negotiation
cohension
impossibilty theorem
cognitive route
13. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
distributive negotiations
problem solving model
relationship issues
active listening activities
14. Based on consistency of behvior
GRIP goals
knowledge based trust
equal concession negotiaitor
deterrence based trust
15. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
irritators
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
Particularism
sequence vs. issue planning
16. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
divergent thinking
key steps in integrative negotiation
a position in negotiation
enlightened negotiator
17. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
pivotal power
seller status framing
social striving
contingency contracts
18. Out of the box thinking
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
ways to generate options to a problem
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
divergent thinking
19. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
a position in negotiation
flower child negotiator
individual collectivism
cognitive route
20. What you say you want - your solution
BATNA
impossibilty theorem
divergent thinking
a position in negotiation
21. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
base rates
perseverance effect
logrolling
communication in negotiaion
22. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
reflections
relationship issues
setting limits
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
23. Working less hard in a group
exploration of options
pivotal power
argument dilution
social loafing
24. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
tunnel vision
false conflict or illusory conflict
joint gain
impossibilty theorem
25. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
illusion of transparecy
walk away alternative
key components in Negotiation
active listening activities
26. Based on intuition and emotion
social loafing
active listening
social striving
affective route
27. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
integrative negotiation
setting limits
reservation price
ways to generate options to a problem
28. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
pivotal power
deductive reasoning
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
nonspecific compensation
29. What you really care about - wants needs etc
functional fixedness
relevant polarity framing
non-verbal attending
an interest in negotiation
30. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
relationship issues
reflections
knowledge based trust
GRIP goals
31. Expand the amount of available resources
knowledge based trust
key components in Negotiation
joint gain
integrative negotiation
32. One that calls into question anothers character
identification based trust
individual collectivism
social loafing
dispositional attribution
33. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
affective route
premature consessions
social loafing
irritators
34. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
flower child negotiator
functional fixedness
knowledge based trust
horizon thinkng
35. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
Particularism
reciprocity principle
enlightened negotiator
knowledge based trust
36. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
inductive reasoning
integrative negotiation
flower child negotiator
active listening activities
37. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
relevant polarity framing
brainwriting
distributive negotiations
integrative negotiation
38. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
social loafing
deductive reasoning
sequence planning
ZOPA
39. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
functional fixedness
nonspecific compensation
cognitive route
Particularism
40. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
old fashioned negotiator
a position in negotiation
active listening
equal concession negotiaitor
41. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
illusion of transparecy
sequence vs. issue planning
old fashioned negotiator
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
42. Members who are attracted to particular members
illusion of transparecy
partnership model
equal concession negotiaitor
common bond groups
43. Clients are treated like partners
partnership model
relevant polarity framing
identification based trust
deductive reasoning
44. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
reciprocity principle
common identity groups
argument dilution
errors that prevent agreement
45. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
non-verbal attending
sunk cost framing
BATNA
reservation price
46. Making projections about future outcomes
enlightened negotiator
base rates
horizon thinkng
deterrence based trust
47. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
reservation price
logrolling
key components in Negotiation
argument dilution
48. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
common identity groups
flower child negotiator
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
verbal minimal encouragers
49. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
errors that prevent agreement
distributive negotiations
Particularism
50. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
identification based trust
illusory correlation
argument dilution
pivotal power