SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
functional fixedness
sequence vs. issue planning
false conflict or illusory conflict
2. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
functional fixedness
verbal minimal encouragers
inert knowledge problem
irritators
3. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
base rates
illusion of transparecy
contingency contracts
exploration of options
4. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
old fashioned negotiator
reciprocity principle
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
deductive reasoning
5. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
gamblers fallacy
base rates
seller status framing
commitment
6. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
social loafing
exploration of options
seller status framing
inductive reasoning
7. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
BATNA
unbundling
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
barrier to agreement
8. The strenght of positive relations within a team
sequence planning
cohension
gamblers fallacy
ZOPA
9. What you say you want - your solution
endowment effect
a position in negotiation
common bond groups
social loafing
10. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
functional fixedness
multiphase negotiations
key steps in integrative negotiation
base rates
11. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
perseverance effect
ways to generate options to a problem
GRIP goals
knowledge based trust
12. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
nonspecific compensation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
sequence vs. issue planning
old fashioned negotiator
13. Clients are treated like partners
partnership model
setting limits
perseverance effect
horizon thinkng
14. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
ways to generate options to a problem
circular logrolli
multiparty negotiations
relevant polarity framing
15. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
distributive negotiations
multiphase negotiations
cohension
unbundling
16. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
issue mix
logrolling
non-verbal attending
impossibilty theorem
17. Making projections about future outcomes
horizon thinkng
commitment
communication in negotiaion
walk away alternative
18. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
non-verbal attending
errors that prevent agreement
walk away alternative
reciprocity principle
19. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
ZOPA
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
defend/attack spirals
legitimacy
20. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
argument dilution
reflections
pivotal power
errors that prevent agreement
21. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
key components in Negotiation
functional fixedness
active listening
commitment
22. The process of drawing logical conclusions
multiphase negotiations
deductive reasoning
brainwriting
enlightened negotiator
23. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
impossibilty theorem
equal concession negotiaitor
enlightened negotiator
24. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
endowment effect
perseverance effect
inductive reasoning
sunk cost framing
25. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
reservation price
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
flower child negotiator
circular logrolli
26. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
perseverance effect
ZOPA
circular logrolli
inert knowledge problem
27. Members who are attracted to the group
common identity groups
BATNA
common bond groups
functional fixedness
28. Proceed towards one answer
sunk cost framing
convergent thinking
knowledge based trust
a position in negotiation
29. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
key steps in integrative negotiation
illusion of transparecy
equal concession negotiaitor
argument dilution
30. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
tunnel vision
sequence vs. issue planning
equal concession negotiaitor
egalitarianism hierarchy
31. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
inductive reasoning
integrative negotiation
walk away alternative
logrolling
32. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
ways to generate options to a problem
divergent thinking
common identity groups
tunnel vision
33. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
relationship issues
impossibilty theorem
nonspecific compensation
key components in Negotiation
34. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
active listening
ZOPA
illusion of transparecy
a position in negotiation
35. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
active listening
cohension
impossibilty theorem
inductive reasoning
36. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
nonspecific compensation
social loafing
inductive reasoning
old fashioned negotiator
37. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
reservation price
unbundling
convergent thinking
inert knowledge problem
38. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
setting limits
circular logrolli
Particularism
affective route
39. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
commitment
integrative negotiation
aspect ratio framing
impossibilty theorem
40. Out of the box thinking
GRIP goals
divergent thinking
exploration of options
problem solving model
41. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
GRIP goals
premature consessions
cognitive route
knowledge based trust
42. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
inductive reasoning
commitment
multiparty negotiations
impossibilty theorem
43. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
ZOPA
nonspecific compensation
joint gain
verbal minimal encouragers
44. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
common identity groups
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
integrative negotiation
reservation price
45. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
egalitarianism hierarchy
perseverance effect
options
ZOPA
46. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
ways to generate options to a problem
walk away alternative
partnership model
a position in negotiation
47. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
equal concession negotiaitor
distributive negotiations
cohension
non-verbal attending
48. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
old fashioned negotiator
deductive reasoning
key steps in integrative negotiation
sequence planning
49. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
verbal minimal encouragers
cognitive route
common identity groups
reflections
50. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
convergent thinking
sequence vs. issue planning
verbal minimal encouragers
walk away alternative