SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
horizon thinkng
knowledge based trust
commitment
integrative negotiation
2. Means by which people influence others
egalitarianism hierarchy
sequence vs. issue planning
walk away alternative
ZOPA
3. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
individual collectivism
exploration of options
horizon thinkng
sequence planning
4. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
communication in negotiaion
active listening activities
integrative negotiation
argument dilution
5. The strenght of positive relations within a team
divergent thinking
cohension
key components in Negotiation
convergent thinking
6. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
communication in negotiaion
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
old fashioned negotiator
7. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
dispositional attribution
enlightened negotiator
reciprocity principle
knowledge based trust
8. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
active listening activities
sunk cost framing
equal concession negotiaitor
inert knowledge problem
9. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
brainwriting
inductive reasoning
issue mix
reciprocity principle
10. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
relevant polarity framing
deterrence based trust
illusory correlation
problem solving model
11. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
divergent thinking
false conflict or illusory conflict
walk away alternative
tunnel vision
12. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
an interest in negotiation
sunk cost framing
nonspecific compensation
defend/attack spirals
13. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
barrier to agreement
commitment
social striving
deductive reasoning
14. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
perseverance effect
commitment
aspect ratio framing
knowledge based trust
15. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
relevant polarity framing
GRIP goals
individual collectivism
partnership model
16. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
cohension
issue mix
egalitarianism hierarchy
endowment effect
17. Clients are treated like partners
multiphase negotiations
partnership model
gamblers fallacy
active listening
18. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
relevant polarity framing
non-verbal attending
seller status framing
multiparty negotiations
19. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
active listening activities
cohension
commitment
illusion of transparecy
20. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
irritators
BATNA
multiparty negotiations
nonspecific compensation
21. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
GRIP goals
a position in negotiation
divergent thinking
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
22. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
reflections
legitimacy
reservation price
common bond groups
23. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
base rates
ways to generate options to a problem
sequence planning
inductive reasoning
24. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
illusion of transparecy
key steps in integrative negotiation
nonspecific compensation
enlightened negotiator
25. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
a position in negotiation
sequence vs. issue planning
egalitarianism hierarchy
illusory correlation
26. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
irritators
identification based trust
deductive reasoning
27. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
pivotal power
non-verbal attending
old fashioned negotiator
a position in negotiation
28. See invalid correlations between events
integrative negotiation
illusory correlation
social loafing
key components in Negotiation
29. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
distributive negotiations
premature consessions
impossibilty theorem
convergent thinking
30. Members who are attracted to particular members
gamblers fallacy
common bond groups
Particularism
seller status framing
31. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
setting limits
inert knowledge problem
sequence planning
brainwriting
32. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
unbundling
impossibilty theorem
horizon thinkng
33. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
flower child negotiator
horizon thinkng
individual collectivism
issue mix
34. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
brainwriting
cohension
sunk cost framing
affective route
35. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
convergent thinking
sequence planning
non-verbal attending
social striving
36. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
individual collectivism
barrier to agreement
relevant polarity framing
deterrence based trust
37. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
gamblers fallacy
integrative negotiation
contingency contracts
distributive negotiations
38. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
inductive reasoning
defend/attack spirals
identification based trust
irritators
39. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
BATNA
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
relationship issues
old fashioned negotiator
40. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
reflections
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
gamblers fallacy
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
41. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
non-verbal attending
ZOPA
horizon thinkng
tunnel vision
42. What you really care about - wants needs etc
horizon thinkng
distributive negotiations
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
an interest in negotiation
43. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
irritators
legitimacy
base rates
44. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
cognitive route
defend/attack spirals
gamblers fallacy
problem solving model
45. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
horizon thinkng
knowledge based trust
gamblers fallacy
joint gain
46. Making projections about future outcomes
horizon thinkng
multiparty negotiations
gamblers fallacy
convergent thinking
47. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
integrative negotiation
active listening activities
verbal minimal encouragers
legitimacy
48. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
tunnel vision
key steps in integrative negotiation
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
illusory correlation
49. Working harder in a group
ways to generate options to a problem
sequence planning
social striving
problem solving model
50. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
inert knowledge problem
seller status framing
multiphase negotiations
pivotal power