SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Means by which people influence others
individual collectivism
egalitarianism hierarchy
affective route
argument dilution
2. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
argument dilution
issue mix
aspect ratio framing
multiparty negotiations
3. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
identification based trust
impossibilty theorem
ZOPA
legitimacy
4. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
active listening activities
ZOPA
sequence vs. issue planning
sequence planning
5. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
argument dilution
inert knowledge problem
barrier to agreement
divergent thinking
6. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
cognitive route
base rates
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
distributive negotiations
7. Out of the box thinking
common identity groups
divergent thinking
barrier to agreement
brainwriting
8. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
verbal minimal encouragers
sequence planning
logrolling
relationship issues
9. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
inert knowledge problem
sequence vs. issue planning
communication in negotiaion
individual collectivism
10. Based on intuition and emotion
affective route
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
deterrence based trust
reservation price
11. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
argument dilution
relationship issues
identification based trust
tunnel vision
12. The process of drawing logical conclusions
inert knowledge problem
deductive reasoning
issue mix
reservation price
13. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
multiphase negotiations
verbal minimal encouragers
inductive reasoning
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
14. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
problem solving model
identification based trust
false conflict or illusory conflict
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
15. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
partnership model
ways to generate options to a problem
cognitive route
endowment effect
16. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
nonspecific compensation
GRIP goals
sequence vs. issue planning
brainwriting
17. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
old fashioned negotiator
GRIP goals
relationship issues
reciprocity principle
18. The strenght of positive relations within a team
gamblers fallacy
key steps in integrative negotiation
social striving
cohension
19. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
aspect ratio framing
tunnel vision
irritators
20. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
reservation price
brainwriting
social striving
21. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
deterrence based trust
premature consessions
Particularism
key steps in integrative negotiation
22. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
horizon thinkng
inductive reasoning
setting limits
GRIP goals
23. Working harder in a group
defend/attack spirals
common identity groups
social striving
exploration of options
24. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
irritators
social loafing
active listening activities
circular logrolli
25. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
equal concession negotiaitor
individual collectivism
key components in Negotiation
key steps in integrative negotiation
26. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
horizon thinkng
errors that prevent agreement
inductive reasoning
active listening
27. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
legitimacy
functional fixedness
illusory correlation
28. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
contingency contracts
social loafing
Particularism
GRIP goals
29. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
integrative negotiation
inductive reasoning
sequence vs. issue planning
dispositional attribution
30. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
social loafing
divergent thinking
aspect ratio framing
verbal minimal encouragers
31. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
active listening
affective route
endowment effect
sequence planning
32. Making projections about future outcomes
common identity groups
egalitarianism hierarchy
ways to generate options to a problem
horizon thinkng
33. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
options
horizon thinkng
sequence vs. issue planning
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
34. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
pivotal power
errors that prevent agreement
irritators
35. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
inductive reasoning
premature consessions
exploration of options
circular logrolli
36. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
sequence vs. issue planning
flower child negotiator
equal concession negotiaitor
false conflict or illusory conflict
37. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
ZOPA
inert knowledge problem
false conflict or illusory conflict
ways to generate options to a problem
38. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
options
integrative negotiation
old fashioned negotiator
Particularism
39. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
commitment
old fashioned negotiator
enlightened negotiator
40. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
inductive reasoning
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
seller status framing
unbundling
41. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
joint gain
Particularism
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
tunnel vision
42. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
affective route
functional fixedness
ZOPA
illusion of transparecy
43. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
illusion of transparecy
common bond groups
irritators
cohension
44. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
knowledge based trust
gamblers fallacy
brainwriting
setting limits
45. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
commitment
inert knowledge problem
key components in Negotiation
issue mix
46. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
sequence planning
deterrence based trust
integrative negotiation
nonspecific compensation
47. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
defend/attack spirals
inert knowledge problem
enlightened negotiator
perseverance effect
48. Members who are attracted to the group
ZOPA
walk away alternative
ways to generate options to a problem
common identity groups
49. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
key components in Negotiation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
old fashioned negotiator
problem solving model
50. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
ZOPA
argument dilution
gamblers fallacy
pivotal power