SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
Particularism
reflections
an interest in negotiation
logrolling
2. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
joint gain
sequence planning
barrier to agreement
BATNA
3. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
horizon thinkng
aspect ratio framing
relationship issues
knowledge based trust
4. Working less hard in a group
communication in negotiaion
walk away alternative
social loafing
joint gain
5. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
enlightened negotiator
cognitive route
multiparty negotiations
inductive reasoning
6. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
setting limits
illusory correlation
social loafing
key components in Negotiation
7. Means by which people influence others
contingency contracts
inductive reasoning
reservation price
egalitarianism hierarchy
8. What you really care about - wants needs etc
exploration of options
integrative negotiation
an interest in negotiation
contingency contracts
9. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
problem solving model
distributive negotiations
multiphase negotiations
flower child negotiator
10. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
inert knowledge problem
relevant polarity framing
reciprocity principle
commitment
11. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
common bond groups
inductive reasoning
premature consessions
issue mix
12. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
contingency contracts
sequence vs. issue planning
key steps in integrative negotiation
integrative negotiation
13. Out of the box thinking
ZOPA
divergent thinking
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
egalitarianism hierarchy
14. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
illusory correlation
reflections
communication in negotiaion
tunnel vision
15. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
aspect ratio framing
nonspecific compensation
illusory correlation
deterrence based trust
16. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
false conflict or illusory conflict
cognitive route
reservation price
common identity groups
17. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
sequence planning
deterrence based trust
enlightened negotiator
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
18. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
communication in negotiaion
errors that prevent agreement
options
egalitarianism hierarchy
19. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
inductive reasoning
dispositional attribution
individual collectivism
Particularism
20. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
walk away alternative
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
verbal minimal encouragers
tunnel vision
21. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
cohension
an interest in negotiation
commitment
BATNA
22. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
reciprocity principle
multiparty negotiations
illusory correlation
joint gain
23. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
issue mix
logrolling
reflections
dispositional attribution
24. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
common identity groups
gamblers fallacy
a position in negotiation
pivotal power
25. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
Particularism
unbundling
impossibilty theorem
communication in negotiaion
26. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
an interest in negotiation
errors that prevent agreement
logrolling
joint gain
27. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
an interest in negotiation
integrative negotiation
functional fixedness
GRIP goals
28. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
integrative negotiation
nonspecific compensation
active listening
endowment effect
29. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
multiphase negotiations
irritators
integrative negotiation
active listening
30. Working harder in a group
affective route
multiparty negotiations
social striving
enlightened negotiator
31. One that calls into question anothers character
dispositional attribution
GRIP goals
joint gain
deterrence based trust
32. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
egalitarianism hierarchy
setting limits
relationship issues
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
33. The union of both parties issue sets
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
deterrence based trust
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
issue mix
34. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
contingency contracts
inductive reasoning
social striving
horizon thinkng
35. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
sunk cost framing
social loafing
cohension
options
36. Proceed towards one answer
inductive reasoning
ZOPA
convergent thinking
cohension
37. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
GRIP goals
brainwriting
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
defend/attack spirals
38. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
impossibilty theorem
false conflict or illusory conflict
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
circular logrolli
39. Clients are treated like partners
multiparty negotiations
affective route
partnership model
inductive reasoning
40. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
ZOPA
irritators
deterrence based trust
enlightened negotiator
41. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
knowledge based trust
impossibilty theorem
inductive reasoning
walk away alternative
42. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
Particularism
irritators
multiphase negotiations
GRIP goals
43. The process of drawing logical conclusions
divergent thinking
deductive reasoning
defend/attack spirals
identification based trust
44. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
affective route
pivotal power
BATNA
flower child negotiator
45. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
active listening activities
multiparty negotiations
communication in negotiaion
a position in negotiation
46. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
argument dilution
reservation price
GRIP goals
circular logrolli
47. Expand the amount of available resources
argument dilution
endowment effect
integrative negotiation
common bond groups
48. See invalid correlations between events
options
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
illusory correlation
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
49. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
key components in Negotiation
equal concession negotiaitor
verbal minimal encouragers
base rates
50. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
false conflict or illusory conflict
inert knowledge problem
legitimacy
verbal minimal encouragers