SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Based on intuition and emotion
reciprocity principle
social loafing
affective route
egalitarianism hierarchy
2. One that calls into question anothers character
barrier to agreement
errors that prevent agreement
dispositional attribution
relationship issues
3. Based on consistency of behvior
contingency contracts
deterrence based trust
irritators
key steps in integrative negotiation
4. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
perseverance effect
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
inductive reasoning
knowledge based trust
5. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
key steps in integrative negotiation
equal concession negotiaitor
irritators
non-verbal attending
6. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
Particularism
knowledge based trust
errors that prevent agreement
nonspecific compensation
7. See invalid correlations between events
dispositional attribution
walk away alternative
illusory correlation
inductive reasoning
8. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
perseverance effect
GRIP goals
dispositional attribution
social striving
9. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
seller status framing
verbal minimal encouragers
identification based trust
tunnel vision
10. Clients are treated like partners
social striving
illusion of transparecy
partnership model
key components in Negotiation
11. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
egalitarianism hierarchy
premature consessions
exploration of options
knowledge based trust
12. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
issue mix
partnership model
inductive reasoning
sunk cost framing
13. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
aspect ratio framing
equal concession negotiaitor
egalitarianism hierarchy
joint gain
14. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
deductive reasoning
sunk cost framing
joint gain
reflections
15. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
old fashioned negotiator
common bond groups
irritators
knowledge based trust
16. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
logrolling
deterrence based trust
brainwriting
divergent thinking
17. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
inert knowledge problem
seller status framing
walk away alternative
integrative negotiation
18. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
integrative negotiation
non-verbal attending
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
pivotal power
19. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
defend/attack spirals
seller status framing
illusion of transparecy
ways to generate options to a problem
20. Working less hard in a group
social loafing
commitment
sequence vs. issue planning
equal concession negotiaitor
21. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
horizon thinkng
ZOPA
multiparty negotiations
enlightened negotiator
22. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
barrier to agreement
sunk cost framing
ways to generate options to a problem
premature consessions
23. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
exploration of options
commitment
cohension
an interest in negotiation
24. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
Particularism
barrier to agreement
key components in Negotiation
non-verbal attending
25. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
old fashioned negotiator
endowment effect
reciprocity principle
26. Making projections about future outcomes
horizon thinkng
exploration of options
commitment
seller status framing
27. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
logrolling
legitimacy
options
joint gain
28. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
impossibilty theorem
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
multiphase negotiations
distributive negotiations
29. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
unbundling
divergent thinking
setting limits
integrative negotiation
30. The union of both parties issue sets
old fashioned negotiator
issue mix
walk away alternative
integrative negotiation
31. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
joint gain
issue mix
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
reservation price
32. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
reservation price
reflections
defend/attack spirals
partnership model
33. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
legitimacy
inductive reasoning
functional fixedness
reciprocity principle
34. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
key components in Negotiation
tunnel vision
old fashioned negotiator
impossibilty theorem
35. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
relevant polarity framing
problem solving model
unbundling
errors that prevent agreement
36. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
irritators
distributive negotiations
logrolling
horizon thinkng
37. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
common bond groups
active listening
cognitive route
horizon thinkng
38. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
inert knowledge problem
errors that prevent agreement
illusion of transparecy
equal concession negotiaitor
39. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
affective route
false conflict or illusory conflict
premature consessions
reservation price
40. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
reflections
active listening
pivotal power
41. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
partnership model
BATNA
inductive reasoning
aspect ratio framing
42. The process of drawing logical conclusions
deductive reasoning
premature consessions
sequence planning
partnership model
43. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
problem solving model
perseverance effect
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
premature consessions
44. The strenght of positive relations within a team
sequence planning
perseverance effect
divergent thinking
cohension
45. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
commitment
inductive reasoning
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
deterrence based trust
46. What you really care about - wants needs etc
convergent thinking
GRIP goals
active listening activities
an interest in negotiation
47. Proceed towards one answer
relationship issues
false conflict or illusory conflict
multiparty negotiations
convergent thinking
48. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
joint gain
communication in negotiaion
individual collectivism
defend/attack spirals
49. Expand the amount of available resources
reservation price
integrative negotiation
egalitarianism hierarchy
nonspecific compensation
50. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
exploration of options
perseverance effect
a position in negotiation
sequence vs. issue planning