SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Based on intuition and emotion
base rates
errors that prevent agreement
affective route
partnership model
2. Members who are attracted to the group
sunk cost framing
commitment
common identity groups
brainwriting
3. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
endowment effect
inert knowledge problem
deductive reasoning
horizon thinkng
4. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
defend/attack spirals
reflections
sequence planning
cognitive route
5. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
ways to generate options to a problem
joint gain
functional fixedness
reflections
6. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
multiparty negotiations
affective route
unbundling
aspect ratio framing
7. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
irritators
premature consessions
BATNA
pivotal power
8. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
identification based trust
endowment effect
active listening activities
impossibilty theorem
9. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
false conflict or illusory conflict
issue mix
knowledge based trust
sequence planning
10. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
joint gain
inert knowledge problem
seller status framing
problem solving model
11. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
deductive reasoning
key components in Negotiation
pivotal power
tunnel vision
12. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
ZOPA
dispositional attribution
identification based trust
ways to generate options to a problem
13. What you say you want - your solution
an interest in negotiation
sequence vs. issue planning
a position in negotiation
commitment
14. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
illusion of transparecy
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
legitimacy
brainwriting
15. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
equal concession negotiaitor
errors that prevent agreement
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
exploration of options
16. The union of both parties issue sets
issue mix
reservation price
active listening activities
aspect ratio framing
17. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
deductive reasoning
non-verbal attending
commitment
exploration of options
18. Expand the amount of available resources
tunnel vision
integrative negotiation
verbal minimal encouragers
Particularism
19. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
GRIP goals
issue mix
knowledge based trust
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
20. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
nonspecific compensation
dispositional attribution
options
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
21. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
irritators
non-verbal attending
reflections
argument dilution
22. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
commitment
identification based trust
common identity groups
exploration of options
23. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
integrative negotiation
problem solving model
flower child negotiator
contingency contracts
24. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
divergent thinking
perseverance effect
inductive reasoning
premature consessions
25. The process of drawing logical conclusions
deductive reasoning
commitment
common identity groups
common bond groups
26. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
multiphase negotiations
ZOPA
base rates
logrolling
27. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
false conflict or illusory conflict
deductive reasoning
a position in negotiation
28. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
aspect ratio framing
contingency contracts
verbal minimal encouragers
circular logrolli
29. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
inductive reasoning
reciprocity principle
convergent thinking
aspect ratio framing
30. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
knowledge based trust
a position in negotiation
joint gain
ways to generate options to a problem
31. One that calls into question anothers character
GRIP goals
affective route
dispositional attribution
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
32. Based on consistency of behvior
deterrence based trust
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
knowledge based trust
commitment
33. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
active listening activities
legitimacy
reservation price
problem solving model
34. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
inductive reasoning
relevant polarity framing
joint gain
pivotal power
35. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
divergent thinking
relevant polarity framing
multiphase negotiations
active listening activities
36. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
circular logrolli
ZOPA
issue mix
active listening
37. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
gamblers fallacy
inductive reasoning
common identity groups
individual collectivism
38. Working less hard in a group
tunnel vision
social striving
social loafing
inductive reasoning
39. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
base rates
walk away alternative
reservation price
nonspecific compensation
40. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
nonspecific compensation
joint gain
setting limits
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
41. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
brainwriting
perseverance effect
aspect ratio framing
a position in negotiation
42. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
verbal minimal encouragers
cognitive route
ways to generate options to a problem
inert knowledge problem
43. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
contingency contracts
flower child negotiator
setting limits
distributive negotiations
44. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
options
contingency contracts
key components in Negotiation
irritators
45. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
relationship issues
illusory correlation
divergent thinking
premature consessions
46. Members who are attracted to particular members
common bond groups
convergent thinking
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
reflections
47. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
verbal minimal encouragers
integrative negotiation
false conflict or illusory conflict
setting limits
48. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
integrative negotiation
an interest in negotiation
problem solving model
49. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
ways to generate options to a problem
sequence planning
multiparty negotiations
seller status framing
50. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
cohension
options
deterrence based trust
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests