SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
Particularism
perseverance effect
defend/attack spirals
legitimacy
2. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
flower child negotiator
gamblers fallacy
seller status framing
commitment
3. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
nonspecific compensation
individual collectivism
pivotal power
reciprocity principle
4. What you really care about - wants needs etc
an interest in negotiation
reciprocity principle
tunnel vision
aspect ratio framing
5. Based on consistency of behvior
deterrence based trust
BATNA
identification based trust
horizon thinkng
6. Members who are attracted to the group
cohension
common identity groups
social loafing
illusion of transparecy
7. Based on intuition and emotion
affective route
legitimacy
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
key steps in integrative negotiation
8. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
multiphase negotiations
relevant polarity framing
barrier to agreement
setting limits
9. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
dispositional attribution
ways to generate options to a problem
integrative negotiation
distributive negotiations
10. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
reflections
identification based trust
an interest in negotiation
errors that prevent agreement
11. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
GRIP goals
flower child negotiator
sequence vs. issue planning
perseverance effect
12. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
sunk cost framing
multiparty negotiations
social striving
commitment
13. Proceed towards one answer
GRIP goals
logrolling
convergent thinking
aspect ratio framing
14. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
integrative negotiation
exploration of options
active listening
logrolling
15. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
distributive negotiations
inductive reasoning
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
joint gain
16. Clients are treated like partners
Particularism
relationship issues
partnership model
ways to generate options to a problem
17. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
inert knowledge problem
common identity groups
ways to generate options to a problem
knowledge based trust
18. Expand the amount of available resources
reflections
egalitarianism hierarchy
integrative negotiation
a position in negotiation
19. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
multiparty negotiations
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
common identity groups
ways to generate options to a problem
20. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
defend/attack spirals
individual collectivism
old fashioned negotiator
cognitive route
21. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
divergent thinking
egalitarianism hierarchy
endowment effect
options
22. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
unbundling
social striving
ZOPA
premature consessions
23. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
verbal minimal encouragers
multiphase negotiations
inductive reasoning
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
24. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
unbundling
relevant polarity framing
reciprocity principle
false conflict or illusory conflict
25. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
knowledge based trust
defend/attack spirals
verbal minimal encouragers
social loafing
26. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
irritators
reciprocity principle
sunk cost framing
non-verbal attending
27. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
false conflict or illusory conflict
partnership model
impossibilty theorem
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
28. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
ways to generate options to a problem
nonspecific compensation
BATNA
multiparty negotiations
29. One that calls into question anothers character
ways to generate options to a problem
horizon thinkng
dispositional attribution
divergent thinking
30. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
communication in negotiaion
false conflict or illusory conflict
unbundling
legitimacy
31. The strenght of positive relations within a team
reservation price
cohension
affective route
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
32. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
options
premature consessions
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
aspect ratio framing
33. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
enlightened negotiator
dispositional attribution
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
ZOPA
34. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
key steps in integrative negotiation
walk away alternative
issue mix
enlightened negotiator
35. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
sunk cost framing
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
enlightened negotiator
horizon thinkng
36. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
pivotal power
inert knowledge problem
knowledge based trust
premature consessions
37. Out of the box thinking
integrative negotiation
cohension
divergent thinking
key steps in integrative negotiation
38. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
options
illusion of transparecy
cognitive route
legitimacy
39. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
perseverance effect
walk away alternative
multiparty negotiations
non-verbal attending
40. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
key components in Negotiation
setting limits
logrolling
equal concession negotiaitor
41. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
inductive reasoning
reservation price
defend/attack spirals
inert knowledge problem
42. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
commitment
walk away alternative
social striving
knowledge based trust
43. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
walk away alternative
equal concession negotiaitor
sequence planning
44. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
verbal minimal encouragers
deductive reasoning
ZOPA
functional fixedness
45. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
active listening activities
logrolling
integrative negotiation
GRIP goals
46. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
reflections
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
active listening activities
deterrence based trust
47. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
illusory correlation
illusion of transparecy
legitimacy
gamblers fallacy
48. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
deductive reasoning
ZOPA
walk away alternative
convergent thinking
49. See invalid correlations between events
integrative negotiation
illusory correlation
active listening
unbundling
50. Making projections about future outcomes
base rates
horizon thinkng
inductive reasoning
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)