SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
aspect ratio framing
integrative negotiation
affective route
functional fixedness
2. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
equal concession negotiaitor
seller status framing
distributive negotiations
aspect ratio framing
3. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
partnership model
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
Particularism
errors that prevent agreement
4. Making projections about future outcomes
old fashioned negotiator
horizon thinkng
gamblers fallacy
tunnel vision
5. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
problem solving model
circular logrolli
key components in Negotiation
joint gain
6. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
setting limits
BATNA
logrolling
sunk cost framing
7. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
illusion of transparecy
reciprocity principle
non-verbal attending
defend/attack spirals
8. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
inductive reasoning
identification based trust
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
endowment effect
9. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
premature consessions
sequence vs. issue planning
communication in negotiaion
common bond groups
10. Members who are attracted to particular members
functional fixedness
common bond groups
aspect ratio framing
integrative negotiation
11. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
old fashioned negotiator
aspect ratio framing
horizon thinkng
joint gain
12. The union of both parties issue sets
reflections
walk away alternative
divergent thinking
issue mix
13. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
sequence planning
convergent thinking
argument dilution
seller status framing
14. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
deductive reasoning
setting limits
active listening activities
legitimacy
15. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
non-verbal attending
problem solving model
commitment
endowment effect
16. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
reservation price
impossibilty theorem
defend/attack spirals
base rates
17. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
logrolling
knowledge based trust
unbundling
reflections
18. Expand the amount of available resources
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
integrative negotiation
unbundling
circular logrolli
19. What you really care about - wants needs etc
setting limits
inductive reasoning
gamblers fallacy
an interest in negotiation
20. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
relevant polarity framing
illusory correlation
perseverance effect
sequence vs. issue planning
21. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
inductive reasoning
social loafing
brainwriting
reflections
22. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
nonspecific compensation
tunnel vision
sequence planning
inductive reasoning
23. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
relevant polarity framing
options
problem solving model
knowledge based trust
24. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
common bond groups
flower child negotiator
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
contingency contracts
25. Working less hard in a group
commitment
partnership model
social loafing
inert knowledge problem
26. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
reflections
social striving
premature consessions
multiparty negotiations
27. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
verbal minimal encouragers
inductive reasoning
legitimacy
28. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
key steps in integrative negotiation
aspect ratio framing
social loafing
multiphase negotiations
29. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
false conflict or illusory conflict
commitment
integrative negotiation
ZOPA
30. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
Particularism
divergent thinking
setting limits
contingency contracts
31. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
a position in negotiation
ZOPA
brainwriting
common bond groups
32. Out of the box thinking
divergent thinking
individual collectivism
relationship issues
enlightened negotiator
33. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
ways to generate options to a problem
social striving
divergent thinking
issue mix
34. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
dispositional attribution
setting limits
active listening
joint gain
35. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
dispositional attribution
commitment
distributive negotiations
circular logrolli
36. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
base rates
false conflict or illusory conflict
egalitarianism hierarchy
convergent thinking
37. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
BATNA
deterrence based trust
distributive negotiations
base rates
38. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
affective route
errors that prevent agreement
brainwriting
logrolling
39. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
active listening
non-verbal attending
endowment effect
dispositional attribution
40. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
sequence vs. issue planning
irritators
reservation price
pivotal power
41. The process of drawing logical conclusions
deductive reasoning
common bond groups
legitimacy
distributive negotiations
42. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
errors that prevent agreement
multiparty negotiations
commitment
social striving
43. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
sequence planning
communication in negotiaion
seller status framing
barrier to agreement
44. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
nonspecific compensation
inductive reasoning
base rates
gamblers fallacy
45. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
horizon thinkng
contingency contracts
Particularism
perseverance effect
46. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
reservation price
commitment
false conflict or illusory conflict
sunk cost framing
47. See invalid correlations between events
illusory correlation
contingency contracts
key steps in integrative negotiation
joint gain
48. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
endowment effect
affective route
reciprocity principle
BATNA
49. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
Particularism
old fashioned negotiator
ZOPA
cognitive route
50. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
verbal minimal encouragers
social loafing
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
partnership model