SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
inert knowledge problem
inductive reasoning
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
illusion of transparecy
2. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
inductive reasoning
BATNA
social striving
common bond groups
3. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
sequence vs. issue planning
non-verbal attending
errors that prevent agreement
setting limits
4. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
deterrence based trust
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
inductive reasoning
perseverance effect
5. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
nonspecific compensation
ways to generate options to a problem
active listening
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
6. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
multiphase negotiations
communication in negotiaion
reciprocity principle
seller status framing
7. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
non-verbal attending
horizon thinkng
contingency contracts
verbal minimal encouragers
8. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
integrative negotiation
contingency contracts
relevant polarity framing
partnership model
9. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
deductive reasoning
common bond groups
barrier to agreement
sequence planning
10. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
false conflict or illusory conflict
unbundling
seller status framing
enlightened negotiator
11. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
base rates
impossibilty theorem
multiphase negotiations
old fashioned negotiator
12. One that calls into question anothers character
legitimacy
horizon thinkng
convergent thinking
dispositional attribution
13. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
impossibilty theorem
GRIP goals
unbundling
sequence planning
14. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
individual collectivism
a position in negotiation
problem solving model
non-verbal attending
15. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
logrolling
inductive reasoning
inductive reasoning
seller status framing
16. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
ZOPA
barrier to agreement
exploration of options
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
17. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
ways to generate options to a problem
cognitive route
perseverance effect
illusory correlation
18. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
commitment
unbundling
verbal minimal encouragers
errors that prevent agreement
19. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
argument dilution
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
knowledge based trust
errors that prevent agreement
20. Working less hard in a group
cognitive route
partnership model
key components in Negotiation
social loafing
21. Based on intuition and emotion
defend/attack spirals
affective route
horizon thinkng
base rates
22. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
aspect ratio framing
ways to generate options to a problem
an interest in negotiation
active listening
23. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
divergent thinking
distributive negotiations
relevant polarity framing
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
24. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
identification based trust
dispositional attribution
argument dilution
reflections
25. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
tunnel vision
deductive reasoning
options
illusion of transparecy
26. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
barrier to agreement
active listening
BATNA
27. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
reflections
options
social striving
walk away alternative
28. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
egalitarianism hierarchy
equal concession negotiaitor
seller status framing
knowledge based trust
29. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
relevant polarity framing
cognitive route
egalitarianism hierarchy
Particularism
30. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
active listening activities
integrative negotiation
multiphase negotiations
setting limits
31. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
reflections
inductive reasoning
gamblers fallacy
32. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
brainwriting
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
perseverance effect
nonspecific compensation
33. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
divergent thinking
walk away alternative
options
illusion of transparecy
34. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
logrolling
deductive reasoning
inductive reasoning
sunk cost framing
35. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
knowledge based trust
a position in negotiation
multiphase negotiations
gamblers fallacy
36. Working harder in a group
distributive negotiations
unbundling
social striving
social loafing
37. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
individual collectivism
inductive reasoning
exploration of options
reflections
38. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
inductive reasoning
endowment effect
circular logrolli
errors that prevent agreement
39. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
errors that prevent agreement
impossibilty theorem
multiparty negotiations
illusory correlation
40. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
flower child negotiator
logrolling
Particularism
dispositional attribution
41. Expand the amount of available resources
key steps in integrative negotiation
aspect ratio framing
seller status framing
integrative negotiation
42. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
joint gain
reciprocity principle
active listening
communication in negotiaion
43. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
Particularism
an interest in negotiation
a position in negotiation
integrative negotiation
44. The strenght of positive relations within a team
an interest in negotiation
cohension
illusion of transparecy
legitimacy
45. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
identification based trust
nonspecific compensation
cognitive route
irritators
46. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
illusory correlation
tunnel vision
dispositional attribution
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
47. Members who are attracted to the group
equal concession negotiaitor
common identity groups
reflections
impossibilty theorem
48. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
gamblers fallacy
affective route
common bond groups
ZOPA
49. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
dispositional attribution
circular logrolli
convergent thinking
joint gain
50. The union of both parties issue sets
issue mix
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
commitment