SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
deterrence based trust
social striving
social loafing
gamblers fallacy
2. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
dispositional attribution
affective route
errors that prevent agreement
3. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
brainwriting
reciprocity principle
exploration of options
partnership model
4. What you really care about - wants needs etc
ZOPA
commitment
an interest in negotiation
egalitarianism hierarchy
5. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
contingency contracts
GRIP goals
communication in negotiaion
old fashioned negotiator
6. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
ways to generate options to a problem
knowledge based trust
walk away alternative
options
7. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
common identity groups
premature consessions
exploration of options
base rates
8. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
sequence planning
sunk cost framing
seller status framing
exploration of options
9. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
issue mix
impossibilty theorem
partnership model
nonspecific compensation
10. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
non-verbal attending
equal concession negotiaitor
premature consessions
irritators
11. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
ZOPA
setting limits
divergent thinking
12. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
impossibilty theorem
errors that prevent agreement
barrier to agreement
endowment effect
13. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
perseverance effect
endowment effect
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
BATNA
14. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
irritators
enlightened negotiator
issue mix
exploration of options
15. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
exploration of options
premature consessions
partnership model
16. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
premature consessions
convergent thinking
base rates
relevant polarity framing
17. Members who are attracted to the group
multiparty negotiations
partnership model
common identity groups
errors that prevent agreement
18. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
BATNA
verbal minimal encouragers
logrolling
circular logrolli
19. Based on intuition and emotion
integrative negotiation
reflections
affective route
perseverance effect
20. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
enlightened negotiator
tunnel vision
seller status framing
options
21. Out of the box thinking
divergent thinking
sunk cost framing
sequence planning
GRIP goals
22. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
active listening
tunnel vision
impossibilty theorem
egalitarianism hierarchy
23. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
premature consessions
key steps in integrative negotiation
commitment
reciprocity principle
24. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
tunnel vision
false conflict or illusory conflict
relationship issues
joint gain
25. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
walk away alternative
premature consessions
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
pivotal power
26. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
inert knowledge problem
cohension
cognitive route
reservation price
27. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
defend/attack spirals
deterrence based trust
inductive reasoning
individual collectivism
28. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
ZOPA
nonspecific compensation
multiparty negotiations
problem solving model
29. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
non-verbal attending
individual collectivism
verbal minimal encouragers
Particularism
30. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
errors that prevent agreement
setting limits
options
legitimacy
31. What you say you want - your solution
circular logrolli
egalitarianism hierarchy
a position in negotiation
integrative negotiation
32. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
sunk cost framing
false conflict or illusory conflict
an interest in negotiation
argument dilution
33. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
premature consessions
inductive reasoning
non-verbal attending
key components in Negotiation
34. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
sequence vs. issue planning
flower child negotiator
nonspecific compensation
Particularism
35. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
reflections
impossibilty theorem
cognitive route
illusory correlation
36. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
perseverance effect
enlightened negotiator
egalitarianism hierarchy
37. Making projections about future outcomes
ZOPA
contingency contracts
horizon thinkng
partnership model
38. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
sequence vs. issue planning
GRIP goals
illusory correlation
argument dilution
39. The strenght of positive relations within a team
logrolling
relevant polarity framing
knowledge based trust
cohension
40. See invalid correlations between events
dispositional attribution
integrative negotiation
illusory correlation
enlightened negotiator
41. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
affective route
inductive reasoning
multiparty negotiations
horizon thinkng
42. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
key components in Negotiation
logrolling
premature consessions
integrative negotiation
43. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
reciprocity principle
key components in Negotiation
perseverance effect
contingency contracts
44. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
legitimacy
argument dilution
egalitarianism hierarchy
nonspecific compensation
45. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
partnership model
verbal minimal encouragers
inductive reasoning
multiparty negotiations
46. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
distributive negotiations
a position in negotiation
legitimacy
walk away alternative
47. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
Particularism
impossibilty theorem
unbundling
reservation price
48. Expand the amount of available resources
an interest in negotiation
integrative negotiation
sunk cost framing
dispositional attribution
49. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
communication in negotiaion
errors that prevent agreement
non-verbal attending
sunk cost framing
50. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
defend/attack spirals
divergent thinking
verbal minimal encouragers
sequence vs. issue planning