SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
illusion of transparecy
multiphase negotiations
impossibilty theorem
illusory correlation
2. Out of the box thinking
base rates
divergent thinking
social loafing
sequence planning
3. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
base rates
BATNA
GRIP goals
reservation price
4. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
individual collectivism
impossibilty theorem
base rates
partnership model
5. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
problem solving model
integrative negotiation
active listening
Particularism
6. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
non-verbal attending
ZOPA
relationship issues
options
7. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
argument dilution
commitment
old fashioned negotiator
nonspecific compensation
8. Based on intuition and emotion
base rates
functional fixedness
premature consessions
affective route
9. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
walk away alternative
gamblers fallacy
key components in Negotiation
identification based trust
10. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
Particularism
seller status framing
barrier to agreement
pivotal power
11. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
dispositional attribution
integrative negotiation
gamblers fallacy
commitment
12. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
inductive reasoning
BATNA
seller status framing
flower child negotiator
13. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
ways to generate options to a problem
inductive reasoning
knowledge based trust
impossibilty theorem
14. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
functional fixedness
relevant polarity framing
barrier to agreement
individual collectivism
15. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
relevant polarity framing
logrolling
convergent thinking
ZOPA
16. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
integrative negotiation
setting limits
illusion of transparecy
egalitarianism hierarchy
17. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
sequence vs. issue planning
perseverance effect
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
distributive negotiations
18. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
communication in negotiaion
premature consessions
options
base rates
19. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
impossibilty theorem
sunk cost framing
gamblers fallacy
communication in negotiaion
20. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
ZOPA
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
horizon thinkng
sequence vs. issue planning
21. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
multiparty negotiations
defend/attack spirals
communication in negotiaion
unbundling
22. The process of drawing logical conclusions
key components in Negotiation
divergent thinking
deductive reasoning
sunk cost framing
23. Expand the amount of available resources
brainwriting
integrative negotiation
relationship issues
aspect ratio framing
24. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
Particularism
sequence vs. issue planning
25. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
flower child negotiator
non-verbal attending
false conflict or illusory conflict
endowment effect
26. Working less hard in a group
seller status framing
aspect ratio framing
social loafing
GRIP goals
27. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
setting limits
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
active listening activities
a position in negotiation
28. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
base rates
contingency contracts
reflections
knowledge based trust
29. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
irritators
key steps in integrative negotiation
identification based trust
ways to generate options to a problem
30. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
deterrence based trust
unbundling
base rates
legitimacy
31. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
reflections
common identity groups
inert knowledge problem
32. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
deductive reasoning
irritators
circular logrolli
distributive negotiations
33. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
nonspecific compensation
distributive negotiations
reflections
gamblers fallacy
34. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
inert knowledge problem
cohension
affective route
sequence planning
35. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
affective route
pivotal power
ways to generate options to a problem
irritators
36. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
deterrence based trust
joint gain
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
integrative negotiation
37. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
active listening
perseverance effect
setting limits
irritators
38. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
identification based trust
non-verbal attending
BATNA
ZOPA
39. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
illusory correlation
brainwriting
premature consessions
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
40. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
individual collectivism
old fashioned negotiator
social loafing
equal concession negotiaitor
41. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
enlightened negotiator
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
aspect ratio framing
reservation price
42. The union of both parties issue sets
defend/attack spirals
divergent thinking
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
issue mix
43. Members who are attracted to particular members
argument dilution
social loafing
common bond groups
inductive reasoning
44. Clients are treated like partners
setting limits
gamblers fallacy
partnership model
nonspecific compensation
45. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
base rates
inductive reasoning
active listening
enlightened negotiator
46. What you really care about - wants needs etc
divergent thinking
communication in negotiaion
BATNA
an interest in negotiation
47. What you say you want - your solution
affective route
reservation price
a position in negotiation
communication in negotiaion
48. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
key steps in integrative negotiation
walk away alternative
joint gain
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
49. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
pivotal power
active listening activities
dispositional attribution
problem solving model
50. Making projections about future outcomes
ZOPA
impossibilty theorem
horizon thinkng
reservation price