SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
Particularism
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
illusion of transparecy
horizon thinkng
2. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
logrolling
key components in Negotiation
relevant polarity framing
sequence planning
3. One that calls into question anothers character
dispositional attribution
setting limits
base rates
equal concession negotiaitor
4. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
sunk cost framing
active listening
brainwriting
dispositional attribution
5. See invalid correlations between events
unbundling
gamblers fallacy
illusory correlation
issue mix
6. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
common bond groups
inert knowledge problem
irritators
integrative negotiation
7. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
active listening activities
reservation price
convergent thinking
8. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
illusion of transparecy
GRIP goals
Particularism
perseverance effect
9. Based on consistency of behvior
options
deterrence based trust
cohension
GRIP goals
10. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
commitment
egalitarianism hierarchy
social striving
inductive reasoning
11. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
old fashioned negotiator
reflections
key steps in integrative negotiation
unbundling
12. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
key steps in integrative negotiation
legitimacy
illusion of transparecy
irritators
13. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
barrier to agreement
perseverance effect
integrative negotiation
cognitive route
14. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
tunnel vision
cognitive route
inductive reasoning
illusory correlation
15. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
communication in negotiaion
deterrence based trust
inert knowledge problem
joint gain
16. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
problem solving model
flower child negotiator
reflections
unbundling
17. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
functional fixedness
commitment
divergent thinking
unbundling
18. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
ways to generate options to a problem
sunk cost framing
cognitive route
19. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
cognitive route
unbundling
old fashioned negotiator
flower child negotiator
20. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
premature consessions
base rates
cohension
functional fixedness
21. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
identification based trust
social striving
defend/attack spirals
irritators
22. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
a position in negotiation
brainwriting
inductive reasoning
ZOPA
23. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
convergent thinking
identification based trust
seller status framing
flower child negotiator
24. Out of the box thinking
common identity groups
relevant polarity framing
divergent thinking
argument dilution
25. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
logrolling
inert knowledge problem
Particularism
walk away alternative
26. What you really care about - wants needs etc
exploration of options
an interest in negotiation
dispositional attribution
setting limits
27. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
nonspecific compensation
legitimacy
communication in negotiaion
BATNA
28. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reservation price
a position in negotiation
reciprocity principle
horizon thinkng
29. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
sunk cost framing
distributive negotiations
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
enlightened negotiator
30. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
tunnel vision
a position in negotiation
illusion of transparecy
knowledge based trust
31. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
convergent thinking
knowledge based trust
BATNA
functional fixedness
32. The process of drawing logical conclusions
BATNA
deductive reasoning
tunnel vision
pivotal power
33. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
non-verbal attending
setting limits
inert knowledge problem
common identity groups
34. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
impossibilty theorem
inductive reasoning
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
pivotal power
35. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
partnership model
aspect ratio framing
common identity groups
endowment effect
36. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
illusion of transparecy
cognitive route
illusory correlation
deductive reasoning
37. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
perseverance effect
illusion of transparecy
deterrence based trust
circular logrolli
38. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
exploration of options
GRIP goals
options
39. The strenght of positive relations within a team
tunnel vision
social loafing
cohension
commitment
40. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
illusory correlation
pivotal power
partnership model
egalitarianism hierarchy
41. Members who are attracted to the group
reservation price
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
common identity groups
irritators
42. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
walk away alternative
social striving
brainwriting
aspect ratio framing
43. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
integrative negotiation
problem solving model
legitimacy
cognitive route
44. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
non-verbal attending
contingency contracts
premature consessions
tunnel vision
45. Making projections about future outcomes
horizon thinkng
issue mix
common bond groups
active listening
46. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
verbal minimal encouragers
sunk cost framing
integrative negotiation
inductive reasoning
47. Working harder in a group
irritators
social striving
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
illusory correlation
48. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
unbundling
inert knowledge problem
problem solving model
distributive negotiations
49. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
horizon thinkng
tunnel vision
functional fixedness
equal concession negotiaitor
50. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
convergent thinking
key components in Negotiation
relationship issues