SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Working less hard in a group
GRIP goals
social loafing
key components in Negotiation
setting limits
2. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
perseverance effect
nonspecific compensation
inductive reasoning
relationship issues
3. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
walk away alternative
verbal minimal encouragers
aspect ratio framing
perseverance effect
4. What you say you want - your solution
options
a position in negotiation
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
relationship issues
5. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
argument dilution
knowledge based trust
cognitive route
unbundling
6. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
unbundling
premature consessions
common identity groups
key steps in integrative negotiation
7. Clients are treated like partners
GRIP goals
multiphase negotiations
egalitarianism hierarchy
partnership model
8. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
ways to generate options to a problem
affective route
tunnel vision
logrolling
9. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
active listening
premature consessions
brainwriting
sequence vs. issue planning
10. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
relationship issues
egalitarianism hierarchy
inert knowledge problem
verbal minimal encouragers
11. Proceed towards one answer
equal concession negotiaitor
errors that prevent agreement
convergent thinking
common bond groups
12. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
logrolling
illusion of transparecy
unbundling
social striving
13. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
base rates
pivotal power
social striving
perseverance effect
14. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
ZOPA
inductive reasoning
active listening activities
problem solving model
15. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
illusory correlation
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
affective route
distributive negotiations
16. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
problem solving model
social loafing
old fashioned negotiator
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
17. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
walk away alternative
problem solving model
knowledge based trust
circular logrolli
18. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
integrative negotiation
defend/attack spirals
endowment effect
19. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
multiphase negotiations
base rates
distributive negotiations
multiparty negotiations
20. See invalid correlations between events
illusory correlation
integrative negotiation
pivotal power
relevant polarity framing
21. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
inductive reasoning
tunnel vision
errors that prevent agreement
dispositional attribution
22. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
irritators
active listening activities
exploration of options
issue mix
23. Out of the box thinking
deterrence based trust
divergent thinking
contingency contracts
deductive reasoning
24. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
contingency contracts
argument dilution
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
pivotal power
25. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
sequence vs. issue planning
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
walk away alternative
cognitive route
26. Members who are attracted to particular members
individual collectivism
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
inert knowledge problem
common bond groups
27. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
commitment
active listening
illusion of transparecy
integrative negotiation
28. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
cohension
illusion of transparecy
key steps in integrative negotiation
old fashioned negotiator
29. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
contingency contracts
nonspecific compensation
argument dilution
dispositional attribution
30. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
multiparty negotiations
perseverance effect
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
31. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
base rates
inductive reasoning
egalitarianism hierarchy
exploration of options
32. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
endowment effect
joint gain
partnership model
common identity groups
33. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
tunnel vision
base rates
flower child negotiator
deductive reasoning
34. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
knowledge based trust
integrative negotiation
errors that prevent agreement
35. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
multiphase negotiations
a position in negotiation
deterrence based trust
communication in negotiaion
36. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
distributive negotiations
equal concession negotiaitor
illusion of transparecy
inert knowledge problem
37. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
knowledge based trust
functional fixedness
relationship issues
38. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
key steps in integrative negotiation
convergent thinking
multiphase negotiations
enlightened negotiator
39. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
sequence planning
old fashioned negotiator
premature consessions
integrative negotiation
40. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
unbundling
argument dilution
multiparty negotiations
ZOPA
41. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
logrolling
inert knowledge problem
impossibilty theorem
communication in negotiaion
42. What you really care about - wants needs etc
logrolling
perseverance effect
an interest in negotiation
premature consessions
43. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
flower child negotiator
sequence planning
deterrence based trust
aspect ratio framing
44. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
barrier to agreement
multiphase negotiations
enlightened negotiator
affective route
45. The union of both parties issue sets
multiphase negotiations
reciprocity principle
joint gain
issue mix
46. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
joint gain
social loafing
active listening activities
sequence planning
47. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
enlightened negotiator
knowledge based trust
sunk cost framing
pivotal power
48. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
endowment effect
brainwriting
cohension
common bond groups
49. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
functional fixedness
verbal minimal encouragers
legitimacy
key steps in integrative negotiation
50. Members who are attracted to the group
premature consessions
aspect ratio framing
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
common identity groups