SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
premature consessions
tunnel vision
relevant polarity framing
inert knowledge problem
2. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
walk away alternative
functional fixedness
illusory correlation
illusion of transparecy
3. What you really care about - wants needs etc
multiphase negotiations
an interest in negotiation
partnership model
flower child negotiator
4. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
individual collectivism
perseverance effect
an interest in negotiation
knowledge based trust
5. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
ways to generate options to a problem
multiparty negotiations
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
common identity groups
6. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
problem solving model
logrolling
inductive reasoning
relevant polarity framing
7. Based on intuition and emotion
affective route
reciprocity principle
divergent thinking
convergent thinking
8. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
cohension
inductive reasoning
relationship issues
false conflict or illusory conflict
9. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
multiparty negotiations
active listening
premature consessions
deterrence based trust
10. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
defend/attack spirals
endowment effect
cohension
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
11. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
nonspecific compensation
key components in Negotiation
BATNA
relevant polarity framing
12. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
social striving
circular logrolli
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
convergent thinking
13. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
non-verbal attending
GRIP goals
logrolling
knowledge based trust
14. Members who are attracted to particular members
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
common bond groups
setting limits
non-verbal attending
15. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
social striving
brainwriting
functional fixedness
pivotal power
16. The union of both parties issue sets
impossibilty theorem
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
BATNA
issue mix
17. The process of drawing logical conclusions
exploration of options
integrative negotiation
deductive reasoning
issue mix
18. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
inductive reasoning
aspect ratio framing
horizon thinkng
individual collectivism
19. One that calls into question anothers character
endowment effect
social loafing
dispositional attribution
key components in Negotiation
20. See invalid correlations between events
perseverance effect
non-verbal attending
illusory correlation
tunnel vision
21. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
sunk cost framing
BATNA
relationship issues
horizon thinkng
22. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
horizon thinkng
sequence planning
active listening
common identity groups
23. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
communication in negotiaion
identification based trust
walk away alternative
relevant polarity framing
24. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
options
endowment effect
horizon thinkng
irritators
25. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
common bond groups
divergent thinking
convergent thinking
impossibilty theorem
26. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
non-verbal attending
old fashioned negotiator
contingency contracts
sequence vs. issue planning
27. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
communication in negotiaion
relationship issues
functional fixedness
old fashioned negotiator
28. Members who are attracted to the group
inert knowledge problem
common identity groups
social striving
key components in Negotiation
29. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
brainwriting
setting limits
exploration of options
reciprocity principle
30. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
ways to generate options to a problem
inductive reasoning
contingency contracts
deterrence based trust
31. Based on consistency of behvior
communication in negotiaion
commitment
deterrence based trust
premature consessions
32. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
errors that prevent agreement
unbundling
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
Particularism
33. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
social striving
BATNA
gamblers fallacy
relationship issues
34. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
non-verbal attending
enlightened negotiator
inductive reasoning
nonspecific compensation
35. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
premature consessions
social striving
inert knowledge problem
base rates
36. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
sunk cost framing
functional fixedness
problem solving model
relevant polarity framing
37. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
sunk cost framing
exploration of options
flower child negotiator
identification based trust
38. Working harder in a group
reservation price
irritators
social striving
horizon thinkng
39. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
relevant polarity framing
endowment effect
integrative negotiation
seller status framing
40. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
relationship issues
brainwriting
inductive reasoning
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
41. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
brainwriting
equal concession negotiaitor
communication in negotiaion
divergent thinking
42. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
deterrence based trust
commitment
tunnel vision
relevant polarity framing
43. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
horizon thinkng
old fashioned negotiator
errors that prevent agreement
setting limits
44. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
relationship issues
legitimacy
brainwriting
social striving
45. Making projections about future outcomes
horizon thinkng
brainwriting
walk away alternative
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
46. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
problem solving model
seller status framing
deterrence based trust
nonspecific compensation
47. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
premature consessions
verbal minimal encouragers
flower child negotiator
unbundling
48. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
reflections
unbundling
enlightened negotiator
49. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
knowledge based trust
reservation price
illusion of transparecy
old fashioned negotiator
50. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
ZOPA
identification based trust
sunk cost framing
convergent thinking