SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
multiphase negotiations
common identity groups
argument dilution
pivotal power
2. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
sunk cost framing
ways to generate options to a problem
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
3. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
affective route
common identity groups
options
an interest in negotiation
4. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
contingency contracts
divergent thinking
reservation price
perseverance effect
5. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
active listening
barrier to agreement
deductive reasoning
illusory correlation
6. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
relevant polarity framing
endowment effect
nonspecific compensation
communication in negotiaion
7. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
non-verbal attending
endowment effect
pivotal power
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
8. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
brainwriting
options
seller status framing
sequence planning
9. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
logrolling
active listening
circular logrolli
endowment effect
10. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
reciprocity principle
relevant polarity framing
relationship issues
false conflict or illusory conflict
11. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
walk away alternative
dispositional attribution
individual collectivism
a position in negotiation
12. The union of both parties issue sets
contingency contracts
nonspecific compensation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
issue mix
13. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
horizon thinkng
convergent thinking
premature consessions
argument dilution
14. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
aspect ratio framing
barrier to agreement
false conflict or illusory conflict
old fashioned negotiator
15. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
unbundling
exploration of options
seller status framing
ways to generate options to a problem
16. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
walk away alternative
inductive reasoning
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
egalitarianism hierarchy
17. One that calls into question anothers character
seller status framing
dispositional attribution
egalitarianism hierarchy
non-verbal attending
18. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
non-verbal attending
irritators
reservation price
aspect ratio framing
19. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
verbal minimal encouragers
inductive reasoning
gamblers fallacy
partnership model
20. Means by which people influence others
egalitarianism hierarchy
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
defend/attack spirals
nonspecific compensation
21. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
reservation price
aspect ratio framing
cohension
sunk cost framing
22. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
walk away alternative
reflections
flower child negotiator
GRIP goals
23. The process of drawing logical conclusions
impossibilty theorem
flower child negotiator
deductive reasoning
active listening
24. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
relevant polarity framing
exploration of options
illusory correlation
logrolling
25. See invalid correlations between events
gamblers fallacy
circular logrolli
illusory correlation
endowment effect
26. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
convergent thinking
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
27. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
Particularism
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
individual collectivism
an interest in negotiation
28. Members who are attracted to particular members
illusory correlation
reciprocity principle
egalitarianism hierarchy
common bond groups
29. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
commitment
relevant polarity framing
aspect ratio framing
30. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
argument dilution
perseverance effect
tunnel vision
relevant polarity framing
31. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
errors that prevent agreement
a position in negotiation
functional fixedness
distributive negotiations
32. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
illusory correlation
ways to generate options to a problem
joint gain
33. What you say you want - your solution
multiphase negotiations
a position in negotiation
perseverance effect
relevant polarity framing
34. Expand the amount of available resources
integrative negotiation
common bond groups
pivotal power
reflections
35. Based on intuition and emotion
active listening
relationship issues
affective route
legitimacy
36. Proceed towards one answer
key components in Negotiation
contingency contracts
convergent thinking
common bond groups
37. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
base rates
functional fixedness
relevant polarity framing
perseverance effect
38. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
circular logrolli
aspect ratio framing
sequence vs. issue planning
integrative negotiation
39. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
aspect ratio framing
verbal minimal encouragers
cognitive route
deterrence based trust
40. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
non-verbal attending
walk away alternative
affective route
a position in negotiation
41. Working harder in a group
integrative negotiation
options
pivotal power
social striving
42. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
BATNA
verbal minimal encouragers
relevant polarity framing
aspect ratio framing
43. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
flower child negotiator
inductive reasoning
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
44. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
egalitarianism hierarchy
functional fixedness
GRIP goals
45. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
key components in Negotiation
walk away alternative
pivotal power
reciprocity principle
46. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
brainwriting
sequence planning
social striving
unbundling
47. Out of the box thinking
enlightened negotiator
integrative negotiation
divergent thinking
common identity groups
48. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
ZOPA
illusion of transparecy
gamblers fallacy
walk away alternative
49. Based on consistency of behvior
cohension
brainwriting
deterrence based trust
logrolling
50. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
social striving
false conflict or illusory conflict
impossibilty theorem
common bond groups