SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
sequence planning
divergent thinking
endowment effect
pivotal power
2. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
egalitarianism hierarchy
social loafing
false conflict or illusory conflict
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
3. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
Particularism
flower child negotiator
horizon thinkng
individual collectivism
4. Proceed towards one answer
exploration of options
cohension
convergent thinking
distributive negotiations
5. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
ways to generate options to a problem
integrative negotiation
argument dilution
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
6. Working harder in a group
functional fixedness
sunk cost framing
multiphase negotiations
social striving
7. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
seller status framing
nonspecific compensation
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
problem solving model
8. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
knowledge based trust
defend/attack spirals
walk away alternative
perseverance effect
9. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
premature consessions
reciprocity principle
irritators
issue mix
10. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
affective route
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
false conflict or illusory conflict
reservation price
11. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
inductive reasoning
individual collectivism
impossibilty theorem
cohension
12. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
legitimacy
sequence vs. issue planning
cognitive route
BATNA
13. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
barrier to agreement
defend/attack spirals
issue mix
14. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
knowledge based trust
enlightened negotiator
distributive negotiations
legitimacy
15. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
tunnel vision
relationship issues
deductive reasoning
partnership model
16. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
Particularism
commitment
integrative negotiation
communication in negotiaion
17. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
contingency contracts
equal concession negotiaitor
nonspecific compensation
exploration of options
18. The strenght of positive relations within a team
perseverance effect
cohension
seller status framing
flower child negotiator
19. What you really care about - wants needs etc
inductive reasoning
an interest in negotiation
ZOPA
false conflict or illusory conflict
20. Means by which people influence others
reciprocity principle
egalitarianism hierarchy
illusion of transparecy
seller status framing
21. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
gamblers fallacy
egalitarianism hierarchy
identification based trust
knowledge based trust
22. What you say you want - your solution
partnership model
perseverance effect
inert knowledge problem
a position in negotiation
23. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
functional fixedness
active listening
cognitive route
inert knowledge problem
24. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
irritators
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
exploration of options
brainwriting
25. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
illusory correlation
brainwriting
social striving
non-verbal attending
26. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
tunnel vision
brainwriting
Particularism
perseverance effect
27. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
affective route
argument dilution
non-verbal attending
verbal minimal encouragers
28. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
unbundling
setting limits
non-verbal attending
false conflict or illusory conflict
29. Based on consistency of behvior
nonspecific compensation
equal concession negotiaitor
illusory correlation
deterrence based trust
30. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
ways to generate options to a problem
dispositional attribution
horizon thinkng
pivotal power
31. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
base rates
individual collectivism
legitimacy
functional fixedness
32. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
equal concession negotiaitor
perseverance effect
sequence planning
argument dilution
33. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
BATNA
multiphase negotiations
old fashioned negotiator
GRIP goals
34. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
identification based trust
illusory correlation
sequence vs. issue planning
inert knowledge problem
35. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
reservation price
irritators
active listening
illusion of transparecy
36. Members who are attracted to particular members
cognitive route
convergent thinking
relationship issues
common bond groups
37. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
multiphase negotiations
deductive reasoning
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
a position in negotiation
38. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
irritators
legitimacy
active listening
ways to generate options to a problem
39. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
egalitarianism hierarchy
divergent thinking
key components in Negotiation
ZOPA
40. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
communication in negotiaion
active listening activities
BATNA
GRIP goals
41. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
inert knowledge problem
social striving
inductive reasoning
errors that prevent agreement
42. Clients are treated like partners
partnership model
false conflict or illusory conflict
base rates
joint gain
43. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
irritators
egalitarianism hierarchy
walk away alternative
false conflict or illusory conflict
44. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
barrier to agreement
cohension
enlightened negotiator
flower child negotiator
45. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
cognitive route
ZOPA
a position in negotiation
divergent thinking
46. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
multiparty negotiations
reservation price
common identity groups
sequence vs. issue planning
47. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
legitimacy
key steps in integrative negotiation
equal concession negotiaitor
knowledge based trust
48. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
equal concession negotiaitor
aspect ratio framing
issue mix
illusory correlation
49. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
identification based trust
enlightened negotiator
equal concession negotiaitor
options
50. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
integrative negotiation
inductive reasoning
brainwriting
convergent thinking