SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
sequence planning
reciprocity principle
legitimacy
individual collectivism
2. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
communication in negotiaion
verbal minimal encouragers
false conflict or illusory conflict
walk away alternative
3. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
BATNA
deterrence based trust
key steps in integrative negotiation
irritators
4. Means by which people influence others
barrier to agreement
egalitarianism hierarchy
GRIP goals
distributive negotiations
5. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
partnership model
commitment
joint gain
6. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
integrative negotiation
social loafing
old fashioned negotiator
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
7. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
contingency contracts
deductive reasoning
ZOPA
unbundling
8. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
options
relationship issues
unbundling
perseverance effect
9. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
verbal minimal encouragers
identification based trust
key components in Negotiation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
10. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
legitimacy
multiphase negotiations
commitment
cognitive route
11. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
aspect ratio framing
identification based trust
cognitive route
reciprocity principle
12. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
integrative negotiation
errors that prevent agreement
an interest in negotiation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
13. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
contingency contracts
GRIP goals
key components in Negotiation
14. Working less hard in a group
unbundling
dispositional attribution
social loafing
argument dilution
15. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
argument dilution
reservation price
an interest in negotiation
irritators
16. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
social striving
walk away alternative
affective route
commitment
17. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
ways to generate options to a problem
functional fixedness
inert knowledge problem
setting limits
18. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
seller status framing
key steps in integrative negotiation
brainwriting
horizon thinkng
19. The union of both parties issue sets
social striving
issue mix
common bond groups
options
20. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
common bond groups
individual collectivism
BATNA
base rates
21. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
barrier to agreement
GRIP goals
knowledge based trust
social loafing
22. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
reservation price
options
defend/attack spirals
commitment
23. Out of the box thinking
divergent thinking
communication in negotiaion
inert knowledge problem
affective route
24. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
multiphase negotiations
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
affective route
options
25. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
active listening
contingency contracts
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
cognitive route
26. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
problem solving model
inductive reasoning
walk away alternative
egalitarianism hierarchy
27. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
verbal minimal encouragers
illusion of transparecy
social loafing
contingency contracts
28. Making projections about future outcomes
sunk cost framing
inert knowledge problem
options
horizon thinkng
29. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
circular logrolli
sequence vs. issue planning
ZOPA
integrative negotiation
30. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
commitment
sunk cost framing
equal concession negotiaitor
exploration of options
31. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
setting limits
gamblers fallacy
commitment
legitimacy
32. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
active listening
functional fixedness
issue mix
enlightened negotiator
33. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
options
relevant polarity framing
ways to generate options to a problem
gamblers fallacy
34. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
verbal minimal encouragers
communication in negotiaion
reflections
partnership model
35. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
gamblers fallacy
exploration of options
premature consessions
reservation price
36. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
active listening activities
GRIP goals
social striving
37. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
identification based trust
relationship issues
setting limits
functional fixedness
38. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
active listening activities
defend/attack spirals
problem solving model
39. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
distributive negotiations
options
unbundling
an interest in negotiation
40. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
illusion of transparecy
inert knowledge problem
nonspecific compensation
integrative negotiation
41. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
inert knowledge problem
joint gain
logrolling
defend/attack spirals
42. Clients are treated like partners
reservation price
partnership model
key steps in integrative negotiation
nonspecific compensation
43. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
impossibilty theorem
egalitarianism hierarchy
sunk cost framing
seller status framing
44. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
enlightened negotiator
false conflict or illusory conflict
problem solving model
relationship issues
45. Based on consistency of behvior
circular logrolli
logrolling
defend/attack spirals
deterrence based trust
46. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
unbundling
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
key components in Negotiation
walk away alternative
47. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
circular logrolli
distributive negotiations
cohension
deterrence based trust
48. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
communication in negotiaion
BATNA
circular logrolli
sunk cost framing
49. The strenght of positive relations within a team
distributive negotiations
reflections
perseverance effect
cohension
50. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
setting limits
contingency contracts
knowledge based trust
nonspecific compensation