SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
reservation price
irritators
key steps in integrative negotiation
2. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
old fashioned negotiator
common bond groups
aspect ratio framing
flower child negotiator
3. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
relationship issues
distributive negotiations
perseverance effect
social striving
4. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
non-verbal attending
reciprocity principle
aspect ratio framing
affective route
5. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
sequence planning
reciprocity principle
reflections
false conflict or illusory conflict
6. The strenght of positive relations within a team
cohension
convergent thinking
exploration of options
deterrence based trust
7. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
sequence vs. issue planning
argument dilution
exploration of options
illusion of transparecy
8. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
functional fixedness
perseverance effect
nonspecific compensation
communication in negotiaion
9. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
sequence vs. issue planning
relevant polarity framing
issue mix
nonspecific compensation
10. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
key components in Negotiation
reciprocity principle
false conflict or illusory conflict
options
11. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
multiphase negotiations
reservation price
Particularism
exploration of options
12. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
reflections
knowledge based trust
base rates
dispositional attribution
13. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
individual collectivism
base rates
cognitive route
key components in Negotiation
14. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
an interest in negotiation
identification based trust
sequence vs. issue planning
dispositional attribution
15. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
setting limits
sequence vs. issue planning
egalitarianism hierarchy
contingency contracts
16. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
illusion of transparecy
false conflict or illusory conflict
key components in Negotiation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
17. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
convergent thinking
a position in negotiation
logrolling
functional fixedness
18. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
options
nonspecific compensation
BATNA
commitment
19. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
multiparty negotiations
functional fixedness
identification based trust
dispositional attribution
20. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
relevant polarity framing
integrative negotiation
GRIP goals
communication in negotiaion
21. Working less hard in a group
legitimacy
social loafing
reflections
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
22. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
key components in Negotiation
functional fixedness
partnership model
enlightened negotiator
23. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
logrolling
multiphase negotiations
an interest in negotiation
walk away alternative
24. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
BATNA
impossibilty theorem
barrier to agreement
base rates
25. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
an interest in negotiation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
partnership model
exploration of options
26. One that calls into question anothers character
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
relevant polarity framing
dispositional attribution
joint gain
27. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
perseverance effect
an interest in negotiation
multiphase negotiations
defend/attack spirals
28. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
active listening activities
key components in Negotiation
distributive negotiations
reciprocity principle
29. Based on intuition and emotion
affective route
inductive reasoning
endowment effect
old fashioned negotiator
30. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
defend/attack spirals
Particularism
reflections
individual collectivism
31. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
reflections
options
commitment
convergent thinking
32. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
partnership model
social loafing
legitimacy
affective route
33. Members who are attracted to the group
contingency contracts
common identity groups
argument dilution
cohension
34. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
relationship issues
sequence vs. issue planning
inductive reasoning
circular logrolli
35. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
convergent thinking
key steps in integrative negotiation
perseverance effect
communication in negotiaion
36. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
errors that prevent agreement
brainwriting
illusion of transparecy
social striving
37. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
errors that prevent agreement
active listening activities
premature consessions
endowment effect
38. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
aspect ratio framing
reservation price
inductive reasoning
logrolling
39. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
reflections
walk away alternative
defend/attack spirals
issue mix
40. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
inductive reasoning
setting limits
pivotal power
active listening activities
41. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
relationship issues
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
gamblers fallacy
options
42. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
a position in negotiation
base rates
equal concession negotiaitor
cohension
43. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
egalitarianism hierarchy
BATNA
premature consessions
flower child negotiator
44. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
seller status framing
cohension
perseverance effect
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
45. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
unbundling
enlightened negotiator
integrative negotiation
reservation price
46. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
logrolling
walk away alternative
barrier to agreement
errors that prevent agreement
47. What you say you want - your solution
distributive negotiations
a position in negotiation
verbal minimal encouragers
contingency contracts
48. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
joint gain
common bond groups
tunnel vision
49. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
setting limits
inert knowledge problem
perseverance effect
pivotal power
50. Based on consistency of behvior
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
individual collectivism
tunnel vision
deterrence based trust