SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Based on intuition and emotion
affective route
divergent thinking
a position in negotiation
Particularism
2. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
ZOPA
individual collectivism
affective route
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
3. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
perseverance effect
legitimacy
old fashioned negotiator
inert knowledge problem
4. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
sequence planning
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
tunnel vision
endowment effect
5. What you say you want - your solution
walk away alternative
multiparty negotiations
a position in negotiation
legitimacy
6. Clients are treated like partners
verbal minimal encouragers
premature consessions
perseverance effect
partnership model
7. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
exploration of options
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
defend/attack spirals
deterrence based trust
8. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
commitment
joint gain
circular logrolli
common identity groups
9. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
social striving
common identity groups
argument dilution
contingency contracts
10. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
multiparty negotiations
seller status framing
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
identification based trust
11. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
problem solving model
inert knowledge problem
seller status framing
base rates
12. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
inductive reasoning
individual collectivism
reservation price
brainwriting
13. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
distributive negotiations
contingency contracts
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
exploration of options
14. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
setting limits
reflections
walk away alternative
horizon thinkng
15. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
identification based trust
reservation price
inductive reasoning
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
16. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
joint gain
contingency contracts
problem solving model
legitimacy
17. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
sequence vs. issue planning
walk away alternative
errors that prevent agreement
perseverance effect
18. What you really care about - wants needs etc
communication in negotiaion
BATNA
common bond groups
an interest in negotiation
19. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
aspect ratio framing
exploration of options
knowledge based trust
partnership model
20. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
premature consessions
unbundling
aspect ratio framing
deterrence based trust
21. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
common bond groups
key components in Negotiation
GRIP goals
contingency contracts
22. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
individual collectivism
tunnel vision
active listening
cognitive route
23. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
old fashioned negotiator
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
social loafing
24. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
problem solving model
old fashioned negotiator
common identity groups
multiphase negotiations
25. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
premature consessions
ZOPA
cohension
logrolling
26. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
reflections
joint gain
impossibilty theorem
base rates
27. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
a position in negotiation
inert knowledge problem
issue mix
integrative negotiation
28. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
sunk cost framing
knowledge based trust
endowment effect
dispositional attribution
29. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
joint gain
premature consessions
sequence vs. issue planning
inert knowledge problem
30. Working less hard in a group
legitimacy
social loafing
egalitarianism hierarchy
Particularism
31. Working harder in a group
cohension
irritators
social striving
brainwriting
32. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
active listening
knowledge based trust
tunnel vision
33. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
reflections
unbundling
premature consessions
perseverance effect
34. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
Particularism
barrier to agreement
tunnel vision
old fashioned negotiator
35. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
aspect ratio framing
logrolling
joint gain
flower child negotiator
36. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
equal concession negotiaitor
multiphase negotiations
defend/attack spirals
setting limits
37. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
pivotal power
defend/attack spirals
barrier to agreement
irritators
38. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
joint gain
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
deterrence based trust
illusory correlation
39. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
circular logrolli
pivotal power
impossibilty theorem
irritators
40. One that calls into question anothers character
cohension
dispositional attribution
inductive reasoning
flower child negotiator
41. Based on consistency of behvior
options
deterrence based trust
perseverance effect
setting limits
42. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
inductive reasoning
verbal minimal encouragers
horizon thinkng
ways to generate options to a problem
43. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
multiparty negotiations
ZOPA
key steps in integrative negotiation
partnership model
44. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
active listening
distributive negotiations
enlightened negotiator
reflections
45. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
communication in negotiaion
premature consessions
knowledge based trust
reservation price
46. The strenght of positive relations within a team
ZOPA
inert knowledge problem
knowledge based trust
cohension
47. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
perseverance effect
commitment
unbundling
verbal minimal encouragers
48. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
GRIP goals
brainwriting
illusory correlation
cohension
49. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
common identity groups
commitment
dispositional attribution
50. Proceed towards one answer
multiparty negotiations
common identity groups
distributive negotiations
convergent thinking