SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
logrolling
irritators
individual collectivism
dispositional attribution
2. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
problem solving model
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
joint gain
deterrence based trust
3. Proceed towards one answer
ZOPA
equal concession negotiaitor
irritators
convergent thinking
4. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
sequence vs. issue planning
impossibilty theorem
false conflict or illusory conflict
multiphase negotiations
5. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
relationship issues
functional fixedness
divergent thinking
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
6. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
sequence planning
an interest in negotiation
equal concession negotiaitor
common bond groups
7. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
active listening
logrolling
walk away alternative
relevant polarity framing
8. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
BATNA
ways to generate options to a problem
common bond groups
illusion of transparecy
9. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
knowledge based trust
reservation price
problem solving model
premature consessions
10. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
options
inductive reasoning
false conflict or illusory conflict
premature consessions
11. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
common bond groups
dispositional attribution
cognitive route
problem solving model
12. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
identification based trust
sequence vs. issue planning
irritators
individual collectivism
13. See invalid correlations between events
illusory correlation
multiphase negotiations
equal concession negotiaitor
irritators
14. Members who are attracted to the group
dispositional attribution
joint gain
relationship issues
common identity groups
15. Based on intuition and emotion
base rates
issue mix
enlightened negotiator
affective route
16. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
circular logrolli
exploration of options
active listening
distributive negotiations
17. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
inert knowledge problem
functional fixedness
argument dilution
key steps in integrative negotiation
18. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
a position in negotiation
sunk cost framing
options
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
19. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
irritators
key components in Negotiation
partnership model
endowment effect
20. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
illusory correlation
sequence planning
barrier to agreement
partnership model
21. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
argument dilution
relationship issues
multiphase negotiations
illusory correlation
22. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
relevant polarity framing
egalitarianism hierarchy
barrier to agreement
seller status framing
23. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
options
social striving
partnership model
knowledge based trust
24. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
nonspecific compensation
illusion of transparecy
equal concession negotiaitor
pivotal power
25. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
sequence vs. issue planning
deterrence based trust
nonspecific compensation
sunk cost framing
26. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
premature consessions
knowledge based trust
GRIP goals
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
27. What you really care about - wants needs etc
reservation price
deductive reasoning
multiparty negotiations
an interest in negotiation
28. Out of the box thinking
multiparty negotiations
integrative negotiation
commitment
divergent thinking
29. The strenght of positive relations within a team
cohension
distributive negotiations
non-verbal attending
pivotal power
30. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
contingency contracts
inductive reasoning
knowledge based trust
joint gain
31. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
errors that prevent agreement
sequence vs. issue planning
nonspecific compensation
flower child negotiator
32. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
deductive reasoning
setting limits
problem solving model
horizon thinkng
33. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
gamblers fallacy
common identity groups
joint gain
legitimacy
34. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
identification based trust
unbundling
joint gain
illusion of transparecy
35. Expand the amount of available resources
seller status framing
integrative negotiation
sunk cost framing
joint gain
36. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
BATNA
social loafing
identification based trust
defend/attack spirals
37. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
relationship issues
an interest in negotiation
verbal minimal encouragers
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
38. Working harder in a group
social loafing
illusory correlation
social striving
flower child negotiator
39. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
convergent thinking
inductive reasoning
inductive reasoning
reciprocity principle
40. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
commitment
flower child negotiator
tunnel vision
partnership model
41. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
active listening
flower child negotiator
commitment
verbal minimal encouragers
42. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
irritators
reflections
illusion of transparecy
flower child negotiator
43. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
endowment effect
ways to generate options to a problem
exploration of options
key components in Negotiation
44. What you say you want - your solution
a position in negotiation
logrolling
old fashioned negotiator
setting limits
45. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
social loafing
seller status framing
nonspecific compensation
brainwriting
46. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
deterrence based trust
walk away alternative
cognitive route
illusion of transparecy
47. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
GRIP goals
options
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
old fashioned negotiator
48. Means by which people influence others
premature consessions
egalitarianism hierarchy
inert knowledge problem
perseverance effect
49. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
affective route
unbundling
relationship issues
social striving
50. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
GRIP goals
affective route
key steps in integrative negotiation
multiparty negotiations