SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
BATNA
functional fixedness
integrative negotiation
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
2. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
dispositional attribution
partnership model
options
reflections
3. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
common bond groups
verbal minimal encouragers
sequence planning
BATNA
4. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
nonspecific compensation
issue mix
inductive reasoning
active listening activities
5. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
divergent thinking
a position in negotiation
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
seller status framing
6. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
setting limits
GRIP goals
premature consessions
problem solving model
7. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
pivotal power
false conflict or illusory conflict
individual collectivism
partnership model
8. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
flower child negotiator
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
options
integrative negotiation
9. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
circular logrolli
deductive reasoning
problem solving model
aspect ratio framing
10. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
integrative negotiation
perseverance effect
logrolling
sequence vs. issue planning
11. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
walk away alternative
unbundling
individual collectivism
identification based trust
12. The union of both parties issue sets
issue mix
a position in negotiation
irritators
convergent thinking
13. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
sequence planning
flower child negotiator
convergent thinking
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
14. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
non-verbal attending
inductive reasoning
reciprocity principle
old fashioned negotiator
15. What you really care about - wants needs etc
an interest in negotiation
argument dilution
tunnel vision
impossibilty theorem
16. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
individual collectivism
horizon thinkng
seller status framing
ways to generate options to a problem
17. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
inductive reasoning
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
communication in negotiaion
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
18. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
identification based trust
deterrence based trust
key steps in integrative negotiation
communication in negotiaion
19. What you say you want - your solution
illusory correlation
dispositional attribution
walk away alternative
a position in negotiation
20. See invalid correlations between events
commitment
illusory correlation
non-verbal attending
setting limits
21. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
false conflict or illusory conflict
dispositional attribution
active listening activities
equal concession negotiaitor
22. Based on consistency of behvior
multiparty negotiations
deterrence based trust
options
equal concession negotiaitor
23. Based on intuition and emotion
illusion of transparecy
legitimacy
affective route
partnership model
24. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
irritators
reciprocity principle
social loafing
inert knowledge problem
25. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
barrier to agreement
egalitarianism hierarchy
perseverance effect
reciprocity principle
26. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
errors that prevent agreement
an interest in negotiation
impossibilty theorem
integrative negotiation
27. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
Particularism
inductive reasoning
GRIP goals
key steps in integrative negotiation
28. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
perseverance effect
nonspecific compensation
illusion of transparecy
ZOPA
29. Members who are attracted to the group
ways to generate options to a problem
distributive negotiations
illusion of transparecy
common identity groups
30. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
horizon thinkng
tunnel vision
sunk cost framing
GRIP goals
31. Working harder in a group
irritators
relationship issues
social striving
functional fixedness
32. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
errors that prevent agreement
endowment effect
aspect ratio framing
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
33. The process of drawing logical conclusions
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
sunk cost framing
illusion of transparecy
deductive reasoning
34. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
relationship issues
commitment
egalitarianism hierarchy
key steps in integrative negotiation
35. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
walk away alternative
premature consessions
functional fixedness
verbal minimal encouragers
36. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
sequence planning
false conflict or illusory conflict
illusory correlation
brainwriting
37. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
GRIP goals
flower child negotiator
deductive reasoning
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
38. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
irritators
affective route
integrative negotiation
brainwriting
39. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
distributive negotiations
reservation price
illusory correlation
active listening activities
40. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
irritators
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
Particularism
41. Proceed towards one answer
brainwriting
convergent thinking
common identity groups
options
42. Expand the amount of available resources
irritators
GRIP goals
non-verbal attending
integrative negotiation
43. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
base rates
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
logrolling
commitment
44. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
pivotal power
problem solving model
dispositional attribution
perseverance effect
45. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
functional fixedness
pivotal power
walk away alternative
defend/attack spirals
46. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
multiparty negotiations
flower child negotiator
aspect ratio framing
enlightened negotiator
47. The strenght of positive relations within a team
cohension
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
relevant polarity framing
knowledge based trust
48. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
Particularism
tunnel vision
problem solving model
active listening
49. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
errors that prevent agreement
active listening
deterrence based trust
social loafing
50. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
exploration of options
unbundling
seller status framing
egalitarianism hierarchy