SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. What you really care about - wants needs etc
enlightened negotiator
an interest in negotiation
exploration of options
ZOPA
2. Working harder in a group
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
ZOPA
social striving
setting limits
3. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
commitment
circular logrolli
tunnel vision
pivotal power
4. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
common identity groups
defend/attack spirals
functional fixedness
old fashioned negotiator
5. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
an interest in negotiation
integrative negotiation
errors that prevent agreement
sequence planning
6. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
reflections
convergent thinking
irritators
relevant polarity framing
7. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
BATNA
legitimacy
unbundling
endowment effect
8. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
Particularism
affective route
problem solving model
old fashioned negotiator
9. Out of the box thinking
divergent thinking
joint gain
argument dilution
seller status framing
10. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
gamblers fallacy
nonspecific compensation
premature consessions
communication in negotiaion
11. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
partnership model
individual collectivism
circular logrolli
inert knowledge problem
12. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
convergent thinking
joint gain
premature consessions
endowment effect
13. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
unbundling
false conflict or illusory conflict
endowment effect
logrolling
14. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
options
setting limits
endowment effect
joint gain
15. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
sunk cost framing
pivotal power
walk away alternative
individual collectivism
16. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
knowledge based trust
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
cognitive route
deductive reasoning
17. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
illusory correlation
deductive reasoning
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
partnership model
18. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
non-verbal attending
base rates
contingency contracts
joint gain
19. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
unbundling
multiparty negotiations
relevant polarity framing
premature consessions
20. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
Particularism
premature consessions
unbundling
identification based trust
21. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
multiphase negotiations
identification based trust
seller status framing
joint gain
22. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
affective route
inert knowledge problem
reservation price
23. Members who are attracted to the group
distributive negotiations
multiparty negotiations
common identity groups
nonspecific compensation
24. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
barrier to agreement
defend/attack spirals
non-verbal attending
sequence vs. issue planning
25. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
key components in Negotiation
inductive reasoning
brainwriting
equal concession negotiaitor
26. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
walk away alternative
commitment
barrier to agreement
key components in Negotiation
27. One that calls into question anothers character
brainwriting
dispositional attribution
seller status framing
inert knowledge problem
28. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
brainwriting
sunk cost framing
false conflict or illusory conflict
cognitive route
29. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
verbal minimal encouragers
active listening
key steps in integrative negotiation
relationship issues
30. The union of both parties issue sets
issue mix
defend/attack spirals
illusion of transparecy
functional fixedness
31. Working less hard in a group
social loafing
egalitarianism hierarchy
pivotal power
irritators
32. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
Particularism
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
knowledge based trust
33. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
Particularism
illusion of transparecy
integrative negotiation
ways to generate options to a problem
34. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
multiparty negotiations
premature consessions
distributive negotiations
an interest in negotiation
35. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
egalitarianism hierarchy
sunk cost framing
old fashioned negotiator
ways to generate options to a problem
36. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
relevant polarity framing
walk away alternative
equal concession negotiaitor
pivotal power
37. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
relationship issues
setting limits
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
a position in negotiation
38. Based on consistency of behvior
deterrence based trust
active listening
argument dilution
ZOPA
39. Expand the amount of available resources
distributive negotiations
affective route
commitment
integrative negotiation
40. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
pivotal power
relationship issues
false conflict or illusory conflict
seller status framing
41. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
defend/attack spirals
relationship issues
reciprocity principle
communication in negotiaion
42. The process of drawing logical conclusions
defend/attack spirals
non-verbal attending
illusion of transparecy
deductive reasoning
43. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
knowledge based trust
key steps in integrative negotiation
flower child negotiator
social striving
44. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
reflections
joint gain
multiparty negotiations
flower child negotiator
45. Clients are treated like partners
partnership model
joint gain
errors that prevent agreement
horizon thinkng
46. Making projections about future outcomes
relevant polarity framing
legitimacy
inert knowledge problem
horizon thinkng
47. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
deductive reasoning
brainwriting
seller status framing
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
48. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
setting limits
illusory correlation
integrative negotiation
base rates
49. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
horizon thinkng
illusion of transparecy
premature consessions
aspect ratio framing
50. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
dispositional attribution
circular logrolli
unbundling
key components in Negotiation