SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
equal concession negotiaitor
sequence planning
setting limits
non-verbal attending
2. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
legitimacy
commitment
exploration of options
flower child negotiator
3. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
knowledge based trust
contingency contracts
legitimacy
distributive negotiations
4. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
inert knowledge problem
common identity groups
key steps in integrative negotiation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
5. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
premature consessions
sunk cost framing
sequence vs. issue planning
social striving
6. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
old fashioned negotiator
common bond groups
reciprocity principle
key components in Negotiation
7. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
key components in Negotiation
defend/attack spirals
old fashioned negotiator
joint gain
8. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
commitment
inductive reasoning
deductive reasoning
multiparty negotiations
9. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
enlightened negotiator
exploration of options
horizon thinkng
sequence planning
10. The process of drawing logical conclusions
deductive reasoning
options
ZOPA
an interest in negotiation
11. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
options
illusion of transparecy
old fashioned negotiator
social loafing
12. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
deductive reasoning
GRIP goals
active listening
integrative negotiation
13. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
gamblers fallacy
divergent thinking
nonspecific compensation
cognitive route
14. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
gamblers fallacy
brainwriting
barrier to agreement
errors that prevent agreement
15. Proceed towards one answer
sunk cost framing
convergent thinking
ways to generate options to a problem
inductive reasoning
16. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
affective route
reflections
options
individual collectivism
17. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
ZOPA
inert knowledge problem
distributive negotiations
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
18. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
seller status framing
distributive negotiations
cohension
brainwriting
19. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
seller status framing
joint gain
convergent thinking
20. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
unbundling
exploration of options
defend/attack spirals
problem solving model
21. Working harder in a group
gamblers fallacy
social striving
nonspecific compensation
identification based trust
22. Means by which people influence others
irritators
non-verbal attending
egalitarianism hierarchy
integrative negotiation
23. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
multiphase negotiations
BATNA
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
contingency contracts
24. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
ZOPA
affective route
perseverance effect
verbal minimal encouragers
25. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
barrier to agreement
active listening activities
illusory correlation
illusion of transparecy
26. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
perseverance effect
common identity groups
BATNA
sequence planning
27. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
legitimacy
enlightened negotiator
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
endowment effect
28. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
functional fixedness
ways to generate options to a problem
legitimacy
illusion of transparecy
29. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
base rates
irritators
exploration of options
divergent thinking
30. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
issue mix
cognitive route
individual collectivism
31. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
walk away alternative
gamblers fallacy
distributive negotiations
false conflict or illusory conflict
32. See invalid correlations between events
base rates
barrier to agreement
pivotal power
illusory correlation
33. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
false conflict or illusory conflict
tunnel vision
cohension
impossibilty theorem
34. Based on intuition and emotion
affective route
circular logrolli
a position in negotiation
unbundling
35. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
GRIP goals
relevant polarity framing
barrier to agreement
ways to generate options to a problem
36. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
relevant polarity framing
circular logrolli
commitment
inductive reasoning
37. The union of both parties issue sets
distributive negotiations
barrier to agreement
key components in Negotiation
issue mix
38. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
commitment
logrolling
inductive reasoning
brainwriting
39. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
options
partnership model
unbundling
active listening
40. Members who are attracted to the group
inert knowledge problem
functional fixedness
key steps in integrative negotiation
common identity groups
41. Making projections about future outcomes
horizon thinkng
GRIP goals
BATNA
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
42. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
brainwriting
relationship issues
endowment effect
ZOPA
43. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
unbundling
relationship issues
sequence vs. issue planning
44. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
endowment effect
setting limits
divergent thinking
equal concession negotiaitor
45. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
cohension
knowledge based trust
flower child negotiator
reciprocity principle
46. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
unbundling
horizon thinkng
base rates
exploration of options
47. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
ZOPA
circular logrolli
legitimacy
illusory correlation
48. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
nonspecific compensation
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
identification based trust
barrier to agreement
49. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
premature consessions
reservation price
a position in negotiation
egalitarianism hierarchy
50. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
joint gain
sunk cost framing
impossibilty theorem
an interest in negotiation