SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. What you really care about - wants needs etc
an interest in negotiation
unbundling
false conflict or illusory conflict
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
2. Expand the amount of available resources
reflections
verbal minimal encouragers
exploration of options
integrative negotiation
3. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
inductive reasoning
gamblers fallacy
key steps in integrative negotiation
deterrence based trust
4. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
ZOPA
Particularism
relationship issues
verbal minimal encouragers
5. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
sunk cost framing
ZOPA
illusory correlation
enlightened negotiator
6. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
reflections
inert knowledge problem
communication in negotiaion
illusory correlation
7. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
inert knowledge problem
problem solving model
identification based trust
enlightened negotiator
8. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
ZOPA
equal concession negotiaitor
integrative negotiation
circular logrolli
9. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
brainwriting
defend/attack spirals
sunk cost framing
non-verbal attending
10. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
active listening activities
integrative negotiation
illusory correlation
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
11. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
key components in Negotiation
verbal minimal encouragers
Particularism
tunnel vision
12. Working harder in a group
common bond groups
inert knowledge problem
social striving
partnership model
13. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
horizon thinkng
relevant polarity framing
reservation price
reciprocity principle
14. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
inductive reasoning
setting limits
irritators
pivotal power
15. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
aspect ratio framing
reservation price
gamblers fallacy
argument dilution
16. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
sequence planning
unbundling
nonspecific compensation
non-verbal attending
17. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
reflections
tunnel vision
circular logrolli
gamblers fallacy
18. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
sequence vs. issue planning
ways to generate options to a problem
endowment effect
walk away alternative
19. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
perseverance effect
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
impossibilty theorem
partnership model
20. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
integrative negotiation
inert knowledge problem
pivotal power
multiphase negotiations
21. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
reciprocity principle
partnership model
walk away alternative
relationship issues
22. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
brainwriting
multiphase negotiations
knowledge based trust
false conflict or illusory conflict
23. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
argument dilution
tunnel vision
equal concession negotiaitor
unbundling
24. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
individual collectivism
argument dilution
false conflict or illusory conflict
inert knowledge problem
25. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
divergent thinking
legitimacy
partnership model
inductive reasoning
26. What you say you want - your solution
Particularism
cognitive route
a position in negotiation
gamblers fallacy
27. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
key steps in integrative negotiation
circular logrolli
GRIP goals
28. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
walk away alternative
enlightened negotiator
communication in negotiaion
reflections
29. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
active listening activities
horizon thinkng
base rates
cognitive route
30. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
multiparty negotiations
egalitarianism hierarchy
sequence planning
legitimacy
31. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
old fashioned negotiator
seller status framing
inert knowledge problem
distributive negotiations
32. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
verbal minimal encouragers
impossibilty theorem
horizon thinkng
non-verbal attending
33. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
setting limits
an interest in negotiation
social loafing
cognitive route
34. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
social loafing
joint gain
GRIP goals
functional fixedness
35. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
exploration of options
common bond groups
illusion of transparecy
36. The process of drawing logical conclusions
horizon thinkng
verbal minimal encouragers
deductive reasoning
distributive negotiations
37. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
verbal minimal encouragers
ZOPA
endowment effect
inert knowledge problem
38. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
inert knowledge problem
equal concession negotiaitor
partnership model
exploration of options
39. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
endowment effect
key steps in integrative negotiation
contingency contracts
partnership model
40. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
joint gain
endowment effect
problem solving model
logrolling
41. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
social loafing
contingency contracts
multiphase negotiations
illusion of transparecy
42. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
seller status framing
defend/attack spirals
contingency contracts
cognitive route
43. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
old fashioned negotiator
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
endowment effect
common bond groups
44. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
defend/attack spirals
BATNA
integrative negotiation
knowledge based trust
45. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
sequence vs. issue planning
walk away alternative
reservation price
defend/attack spirals
46. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
multiparty negotiations
endowment effect
inductive reasoning
sequence planning
47. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
options
endowment effect
enlightened negotiator
reciprocity principle
48. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
social loafing
circular logrolli
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
Particularism
49. One that calls into question anothers character
irritators
individual collectivism
partnership model
dispositional attribution
50. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
circular logrolli
seller status framing
key steps in integrative negotiation
active listening activities