SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
non-verbal attending
knowledge based trust
argument dilution
relationship issues
2. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
relevant polarity framing
pivotal power
identification based trust
reservation price
3. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
illusory correlation
contingency contracts
relevant polarity framing
old fashioned negotiator
4. What you really care about - wants needs etc
unbundling
deterrence based trust
ways to generate options to a problem
an interest in negotiation
5. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
premature consessions
walk away alternative
social striving
perseverance effect
6. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
ways to generate options to a problem
inductive reasoning
endowment effect
premature consessions
7. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
old fashioned negotiator
deterrence based trust
issue mix
enlightened negotiator
8. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
walk away alternative
base rates
joint gain
sequence planning
9. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
Particularism
verbal minimal encouragers
identification based trust
deductive reasoning
10. The process of drawing logical conclusions
defend/attack spirals
sequence vs. issue planning
deductive reasoning
multiparty negotiations
11. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
sequence vs. issue planning
key steps in integrative negotiation
functional fixedness
tunnel vision
12. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
gamblers fallacy
equal concession negotiaitor
a position in negotiation
irritators
13. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
multiparty negotiations
distributive negotiations
Particularism
14. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
Particularism
equal concession negotiaitor
circular logrolli
egalitarianism hierarchy
15. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
integrative negotiation
active listening activities
argument dilution
ZOPA
16. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
defend/attack spirals
premature consessions
circular logrolli
legitimacy
17. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
distributive negotiations
key components in Negotiation
base rates
sunk cost framing
18. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
aspect ratio framing
legitimacy
horizon thinkng
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
19. The union of both parties issue sets
sunk cost framing
issue mix
unbundling
nonspecific compensation
20. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
common bond groups
common identity groups
circular logrolli
sunk cost framing
21. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
sequence planning
reflections
active listening activities
Particularism
22. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
old fashioned negotiator
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
active listening
inert knowledge problem
23. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
key steps in integrative negotiation
old fashioned negotiator
deterrence based trust
perseverance effect
24. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
multiparty negotiations
non-verbal attending
legitimacy
sequence planning
25. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
flower child negotiator
sequence planning
26. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
flower child negotiator
social loafing
common identity groups
divergent thinking
27. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
reservation price
deductive reasoning
endowment effect
legitimacy
28. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
sunk cost framing
active listening
BATNA
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
29. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
a position in negotiation
walk away alternative
barrier to agreement
convergent thinking
30. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
seller status framing
sequence vs. issue planning
a position in negotiation
31. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
an interest in negotiation
false conflict or illusory conflict
divergent thinking
multiparty negotiations
32. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
barrier to agreement
affective route
setting limits
33. Members who are attracted to the group
options
sequence vs. issue planning
flower child negotiator
common identity groups
34. One that calls into question anothers character
walk away alternative
common bond groups
aspect ratio framing
dispositional attribution
35. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
communication in negotiaion
illusion of transparecy
integrative negotiation
cognitive route
36. Clients are treated like partners
nonspecific compensation
multiphase negotiations
cohension
partnership model
37. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
individual collectivism
enlightened negotiator
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
commitment
38. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
key steps in integrative negotiation
brainwriting
communication in negotiaion
active listening
39. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
flower child negotiator
communication in negotiaion
legitimacy
active listening activities
40. Expand the amount of available resources
integrative negotiation
identification based trust
illusory correlation
social striving
41. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
setting limits
inductive reasoning
common identity groups
walk away alternative
42. Proceed towards one answer
common identity groups
convergent thinking
dispositional attribution
ZOPA
43. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
GRIP goals
partnership model
perseverance effect
pivotal power
44. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
ways to generate options to a problem
convergent thinking
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
a position in negotiation
45. Out of the box thinking
relevant polarity framing
argument dilution
divergent thinking
aspect ratio framing
46. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
gamblers fallacy
logrolling
active listening
brainwriting
47. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
false conflict or illusory conflict
inert knowledge problem
unbundling
48. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
multiparty negotiations
sunk cost framing
verbal minimal encouragers
convergent thinking
49. What you say you want - your solution
integrative negotiation
circular logrolli
a position in negotiation
options
50. Working harder in a group
cognitive route
old fashioned negotiator
social striving
integrative negotiation