SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
logrolling
illusion of transparecy
partnership model
divergent thinking
2. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
gamblers fallacy
errors that prevent agreement
brainwriting
relevant polarity framing
3. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
BATNA
barrier to agreement
brainwriting
multiphase negotiations
4. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
commitment
a position in negotiation
old fashioned negotiator
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
5. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
integrative negotiation
reciprocity principle
base rates
relationship issues
6. Expand the amount of available resources
contingency contracts
enlightened negotiator
integrative negotiation
argument dilution
7. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
multiphase negotiations
enlightened negotiator
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
active listening
8. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
knowledge based trust
illusion of transparecy
social striving
9. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
non-verbal attending
seller status framing
old fashioned negotiator
10. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
brainwriting
divergent thinking
individual collectivism
identification based trust
11. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
exploration of options
premature consessions
relationship issues
argument dilution
12. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
reservation price
sequence planning
multiparty negotiations
cognitive route
13. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
communication in negotiaion
argument dilution
sequence vs. issue planning
circular logrolli
14. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
enlightened negotiator
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
flower child negotiator
common bond groups
15. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
joint gain
gamblers fallacy
BATNA
flower child negotiator
16. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
false conflict or illusory conflict
irritators
nonspecific compensation
an interest in negotiation
17. Means by which people influence others
egalitarianism hierarchy
Particularism
false conflict or illusory conflict
non-verbal attending
18. One that calls into question anothers character
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
communication in negotiaion
dispositional attribution
an interest in negotiation
19. Members who are attracted to the group
common identity groups
inert knowledge problem
social loafing
integrative negotiation
20. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
cohension
key steps in integrative negotiation
sunk cost framing
joint gain
21. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
knowledge based trust
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
irritators
commitment
22. Based on consistency of behvior
issue mix
integrative negotiation
unbundling
deterrence based trust
23. The process of drawing logical conclusions
deductive reasoning
deterrence based trust
problem solving model
argument dilution
24. Clients are treated like partners
contingency contracts
key components in Negotiation
social striving
partnership model
25. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
reservation price
enlightened negotiator
GRIP goals
BATNA
26. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
logrolling
deductive reasoning
false conflict or illusory conflict
multiparty negotiations
27. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
individual collectivism
integrative negotiation
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
relationship issues
28. Working harder in a group
integrative negotiation
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
social striving
social loafing
29. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
individual collectivism
premature consessions
ways to generate options to a problem
cohension
30. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
brainwriting
barrier to agreement
egalitarianism hierarchy
illusion of transparecy
31. The union of both parties issue sets
sequence vs. issue planning
gamblers fallacy
pivotal power
issue mix
32. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
reflections
relationship issues
a position in negotiation
active listening
33. Making projections about future outcomes
knowledge based trust
defend/attack spirals
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
horizon thinkng
34. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
relevant polarity framing
active listening
base rates
aspect ratio framing
35. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
equal concession negotiaitor
cognitive route
aspect ratio framing
nonspecific compensation
36. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
equal concession negotiaitor
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
relevant polarity framing
communication in negotiaion
37. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
nonspecific compensation
unbundling
perseverance effect
GRIP goals
38. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
divergent thinking
nonspecific compensation
logrolling
39. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
reservation price
an interest in negotiation
impossibilty theorem
multiparty negotiations
40. What you say you want - your solution
key components in Negotiation
deterrence based trust
a position in negotiation
legitimacy
41. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
false conflict or illusory conflict
identification based trust
tunnel vision
brainwriting
42. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
argument dilution
GRIP goals
ZOPA
exploration of options
43. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
inductive reasoning
errors that prevent agreement
legitimacy
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
44. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
gamblers fallacy
dispositional attribution
exploration of options
inert knowledge problem
45. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
joint gain
false conflict or illusory conflict
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
key components in Negotiation
46. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
dispositional attribution
reservation price
divergent thinking
key components in Negotiation
47. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
cognitive route
defend/attack spirals
setting limits
BATNA
48. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
identification based trust
setting limits
egalitarianism hierarchy
49. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
horizon thinkng
enlightened negotiator
deductive reasoning
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
50. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
nonspecific compensation
cohension
contingency contracts
errors that prevent agreement