SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
non-verbal attending
BATNA
defend/attack spirals
inert knowledge problem
2. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
multiparty negotiations
a position in negotiation
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
3. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
multiparty negotiations
common bond groups
active listening
common identity groups
4. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
common identity groups
pivotal power
partnership model
relevant polarity framing
5. See invalid correlations between events
reflections
sequence planning
options
illusory correlation
6. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
knowledge based trust
sequence vs. issue planning
perseverance effect
ways to generate options to a problem
7. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
key steps in integrative negotiation
reservation price
relevant polarity framing
reflections
8. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
GRIP goals
relationship issues
deductive reasoning
key steps in integrative negotiation
9. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
sequence vs. issue planning
partnership model
seller status framing
affective route
10. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
defend/attack spirals
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
multiparty negotiations
seller status framing
11. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
seller status framing
illusion of transparecy
horizon thinkng
12. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
verbal minimal encouragers
relevant polarity framing
logrolling
13. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
affective route
endowment effect
joint gain
false conflict or illusory conflict
14. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
irritators
sequence planning
premature consessions
15. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
affective route
sequence vs. issue planning
common bond groups
verbal minimal encouragers
16. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
divergent thinking
contingency contracts
horizon thinkng
aspect ratio framing
17. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
options
reflections
defend/attack spirals
knowledge based trust
18. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
convergent thinking
reservation price
functional fixedness
identification based trust
19. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
aspect ratio framing
irritators
sunk cost framing
20. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
divergent thinking
unbundling
brainwriting
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
21. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
social loafing
functional fixedness
perseverance effect
illusory correlation
22. Out of the box thinking
verbal minimal encouragers
divergent thinking
walk away alternative
inert knowledge problem
23. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
sunk cost framing
defend/attack spirals
legitimacy
inductive reasoning
24. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
barrier to agreement
irritators
cohension
Particularism
25. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
inert knowledge problem
ZOPA
distributive negotiations
relevant polarity framing
26. The union of both parties issue sets
issue mix
partnership model
Particularism
functional fixedness
27. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
functional fixedness
knowledge based trust
walk away alternative
false conflict or illusory conflict
28. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
sequence planning
non-verbal attending
errors that prevent agreement
relevant polarity framing
29. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
illusory correlation
integrative negotiation
deductive reasoning
identification based trust
30. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
key components in Negotiation
cognitive route
distributive negotiations
options
31. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
reflections
sunk cost framing
seller status framing
nonspecific compensation
32. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
commitment
argument dilution
individual collectivism
cohension
33. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
identification based trust
illusion of transparecy
argument dilution
aspect ratio framing
34. Members who are attracted to the group
perseverance effect
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
common identity groups
35. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
ZOPA
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
commitment
ways to generate options to a problem
36. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
equal concession negotiaitor
gamblers fallacy
illusory correlation
legitimacy
37. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
illusory correlation
contingency contracts
integrative negotiation
tunnel vision
38. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
problem solving model
reflections
enlightened negotiator
nonspecific compensation
39. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
multiparty negotiations
dispositional attribution
equal concession negotiaitor
defend/attack spirals
40. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
common bond groups
dispositional attribution
brainwriting
sequence planning
41. The process of drawing logical conclusions
base rates
common identity groups
deductive reasoning
logrolling
42. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
perseverance effect
dispositional attribution
common bond groups
reflections
43. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
sunk cost framing
exploration of options
issue mix
irritators
44. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
reservation price
barrier to agreement
functional fixedness
BATNA
45. Clients are treated like partners
partnership model
argument dilution
verbal minimal encouragers
distributive negotiations
46. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
logrolling
options
deterrence based trust
legitimacy
47. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
logrolling
errors that prevent agreement
setting limits
identification based trust
48. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
errors that prevent agreement
joint gain
logrolling
sequence planning
49. Based on consistency of behvior
divergent thinking
inductive reasoning
social loafing
deterrence based trust
50. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
inductive reasoning
horizon thinkng
BATNA
walk away alternative