SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
equal concession negotiaitor
key steps in integrative negotiation
irritators
reflections
2. What you really care about - wants needs etc
issue mix
an interest in negotiation
perseverance effect
communication in negotiaion
3. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
false conflict or illusory conflict
gamblers fallacy
integrative negotiation
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
4. Proceed towards one answer
gamblers fallacy
convergent thinking
Particularism
GRIP goals
5. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
BATNA
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
options
deductive reasoning
6. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
enlightened negotiator
convergent thinking
communication in negotiaion
errors that prevent agreement
7. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
joint gain
integrative negotiation
reciprocity principle
deductive reasoning
8. One that calls into question anothers character
illusory correlation
active listening activities
reservation price
dispositional attribution
9. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
key components in Negotiation
deterrence based trust
impossibilty theorem
endowment effect
10. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
key steps in integrative negotiation
irritators
gamblers fallacy
distributive negotiations
11. Clients are treated like partners
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
an interest in negotiation
inductive reasoning
partnership model
12. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
GRIP goals
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
irritators
multiparty negotiations
13. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
inductive reasoning
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
impossibilty theorem
integrative negotiation
14. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
ZOPA
non-verbal attending
endowment effect
deterrence based trust
15. See invalid correlations between events
illusory correlation
reciprocity principle
an interest in negotiation
setting limits
16. Based on intuition and emotion
nonspecific compensation
logrolling
social loafing
affective route
17. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
base rates
integrative negotiation
unbundling
ZOPA
18. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
brainwriting
seller status framing
cohension
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
19. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
active listening activities
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
social loafing
key components in Negotiation
20. Based on consistency of behvior
dispositional attribution
brainwriting
deterrence based trust
legitimacy
21. Members who are attracted to the group
horizon thinkng
key components in Negotiation
common identity groups
illusory correlation
22. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
enlightened negotiator
a position in negotiation
problem solving model
gamblers fallacy
23. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
contingency contracts
logrolling
perseverance effect
integrative negotiation
24. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
relationship issues
verbal minimal encouragers
knowledge based trust
options
25. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
verbal minimal encouragers
barrier to agreement
inductive reasoning
distributive negotiations
26. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
sequence planning
deterrence based trust
contingency contracts
inductive reasoning
27. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
joint gain
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
tunnel vision
perseverance effect
28. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
key steps in integrative negotiation
joint gain
enlightened negotiator
dispositional attribution
29. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
inert knowledge problem
cohension
inductive reasoning
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
30. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
sequence vs. issue planning
options
argument dilution
exploration of options
31. Means by which people influence others
ways to generate options to a problem
sunk cost framing
individual collectivism
egalitarianism hierarchy
32. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
affective route
relevant polarity framing
contingency contracts
argument dilution
33. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
ZOPA
deterrence based trust
commitment
multiparty negotiations
34. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
Particularism
flower child negotiator
barrier to agreement
dispositional attribution
35. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
brainwriting
ways to generate options to a problem
irritators
equal concession negotiaitor
36. Members who are attracted to particular members
flower child negotiator
common bond groups
illusion of transparecy
active listening
37. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
inductive reasoning
divergent thinking
pivotal power
circular logrolli
38. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
premature consessions
identification based trust
unbundling
communication in negotiaion
39. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
integrative negotiation
gamblers fallacy
tunnel vision
issue mix
40. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
impossibilty theorem
inert knowledge problem
reciprocity principle
multiphase negotiations
41. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
common identity groups
circular logrolli
inductive reasoning
GRIP goals
42. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
setting limits
active listening
relevant polarity framing
dispositional attribution
43. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
BATNA
perseverance effect
walk away alternative
a position in negotiation
44. What you say you want - your solution
relationship issues
a position in negotiation
active listening activities
inductive reasoning
45. Expand the amount of available resources
integrative negotiation
options
seller status framing
relationship issues
46. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
joint gain
perseverance effect
cognitive route
47. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
irritators
old fashioned negotiator
defend/attack spirals
illusion of transparecy
48. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
endowment effect
BATNA
premature consessions
legitimacy
49. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
false conflict or illusory conflict
individual collectivism
horizon thinkng
active listening
50. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
communication in negotiaion
walk away alternative
impossibilty theorem
relevant polarity framing