SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. See invalid correlations between events
inert knowledge problem
seller status framing
illusory correlation
legitimacy
2. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
premature consessions
perseverance effect
aspect ratio framing
sequence planning
3. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
old fashioned negotiator
deductive reasoning
social striving
circular logrolli
4. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
unbundling
key steps in integrative negotiation
logrolling
old fashioned negotiator
5. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
key steps in integrative negotiation
sequence vs. issue planning
ZOPA
social striving
6. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
key steps in integrative negotiation
joint gain
sequence vs. issue planning
key components in Negotiation
7. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
deterrence based trust
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
logrolling
active listening activities
8. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
knowledge based trust
relevant polarity framing
convergent thinking
impossibilty theorem
9. Means by which people influence others
aspect ratio framing
egalitarianism hierarchy
flower child negotiator
tunnel vision
10. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
issue mix
divergent thinking
joint gain
brainwriting
11. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
perseverance effect
reflections
old fashioned negotiator
enlightened negotiator
12. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
illusion of transparecy
active listening activities
verbal minimal encouragers
BATNA
13. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
ways to generate options to a problem
BATNA
illusion of transparecy
cognitive route
14. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
problem solving model
verbal minimal encouragers
joint gain
non-verbal attending
15. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
setting limits
dispositional attribution
exploration of options
equal concession negotiaitor
16. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
ways to generate options to a problem
illusory correlation
contingency contracts
reservation price
17. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
seller status framing
illusory correlation
divergent thinking
sunk cost framing
18. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
active listening
GRIP goals
gamblers fallacy
dispositional attribution
19. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
contingency contracts
cognitive route
inert knowledge problem
reservation price
20. The strenght of positive relations within a team
tunnel vision
cognitive route
identification based trust
cohension
21. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
inductive reasoning
affective route
GRIP goals
relationship issues
22. The union of both parties issue sets
active listening
an interest in negotiation
issue mix
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
23. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
sequence planning
multiparty negotiations
illusory correlation
walk away alternative
24. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
contingency contracts
premature consessions
illusion of transparecy
reciprocity principle
25. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
unbundling
joint gain
aspect ratio framing
functional fixedness
26. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
deterrence based trust
problem solving model
integrative negotiation
premature consessions
27. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
deterrence based trust
reservation price
individual collectivism
contingency contracts
28. Clients are treated like partners
integrative negotiation
ways to generate options to a problem
logrolling
partnership model
29. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
GRIP goals
unbundling
argument dilution
seller status framing
30. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
verbal minimal encouragers
horizon thinkng
integrative negotiation
nonspecific compensation
31. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
convergent thinking
legitimacy
false conflict or illusory conflict
active listening
32. Based on consistency of behvior
key steps in integrative negotiation
deterrence based trust
BATNA
common identity groups
33. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
base rates
inert knowledge problem
relevant polarity framing
setting limits
34. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
inductive reasoning
active listening
commitment
logrolling
35. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
tunnel vision
partnership model
illusory correlation
36. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
social striving
enlightened negotiator
logrolling
nonspecific compensation
37. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
tunnel vision
problem solving model
affective route
communication in negotiaion
38. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
aspect ratio framing
walk away alternative
tunnel vision
contingency contracts
39. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
gamblers fallacy
illusory correlation
false conflict or illusory conflict
40. Out of the box thinking
partnership model
old fashioned negotiator
divergent thinking
sequence vs. issue planning
41. One that calls into question anothers character
integrative negotiation
deductive reasoning
common identity groups
dispositional attribution
42. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
defend/attack spirals
key components in Negotiation
pivotal power
sequence planning
43. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
aspect ratio framing
legitimacy
impossibilty theorem
integrative negotiation
44. What you really care about - wants needs etc
an interest in negotiation
affective route
legitimacy
reservation price
45. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
illusory correlation
ZOPA
integrative negotiation
reciprocity principle
46. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
egalitarianism hierarchy
exploration of options
multiparty negotiations
defend/attack spirals
47. Making projections about future outcomes
active listening
horizon thinkng
endowment effect
tunnel vision
48. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
key steps in integrative negotiation
tunnel vision
knowledge based trust
deductive reasoning
49. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
pivotal power
barrier to agreement
horizon thinkng
brainwriting
50. Expand the amount of available resources
cognitive route
impossibilty theorem
social striving
integrative negotiation