SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
legitimacy
multiphase negotiations
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
2. Clients are treated like partners
pivotal power
social loafing
partnership model
inductive reasoning
3. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
Particularism
multiphase negotiations
sequence planning
base rates
4. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
errors that prevent agreement
common bond groups
inductive reasoning
cognitive route
5. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
common identity groups
sunk cost framing
contingency contracts
non-verbal attending
6. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
flower child negotiator
defend/attack spirals
gamblers fallacy
nonspecific compensation
7. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
divergent thinking
defend/attack spirals
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
8. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
old fashioned negotiator
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
ZOPA
options
9. The process of drawing logical conclusions
multiparty negotiations
reciprocity principle
enlightened negotiator
deductive reasoning
10. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
logrolling
sequence vs. issue planning
illusion of transparecy
key components in Negotiation
11. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
sequence planning
Particularism
joint gain
common identity groups
12. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
circular logrolli
active listening
common bond groups
reservation price
13. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
cognitive route
enlightened negotiator
issue mix
sunk cost framing
14. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
social loafing
pivotal power
endowment effect
divergent thinking
15. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
reciprocity principle
errors that prevent agreement
active listening
individual collectivism
16. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
sequence planning
unbundling
base rates
individual collectivism
17. What you say you want - your solution
a position in negotiation
communication in negotiaion
common bond groups
an interest in negotiation
18. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
nonspecific compensation
partnership model
exploration of options
identification based trust
19. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
argument dilution
circular logrolli
walk away alternative
errors that prevent agreement
20. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
equal concession negotiaitor
a position in negotiation
logrolling
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
21. Members who are attracted to the group
seller status framing
false conflict or illusory conflict
common identity groups
legitimacy
22. See invalid correlations between events
sunk cost framing
illusory correlation
unbundling
multiparty negotiations
23. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
irritators
key components in Negotiation
perseverance effect
convergent thinking
24. What you really care about - wants needs etc
an interest in negotiation
communication in negotiaion
distributive negotiations
divergent thinking
25. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
seller status framing
exploration of options
a position in negotiation
commitment
26. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
affective route
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
argument dilution
impossibilty theorem
27. One that calls into question anothers character
partnership model
problem solving model
dispositional attribution
reciprocity principle
28. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
premature consessions
Particularism
false conflict or illusory conflict
knowledge based trust
29. The strenght of positive relations within a team
knowledge based trust
BATNA
problem solving model
cohension
30. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
legitimacy
exploration of options
argument dilution
nonspecific compensation
31. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
defend/attack spirals
setting limits
distributive negotiations
dispositional attribution
32. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
active listening
verbal minimal encouragers
social striving
impossibilty theorem
33. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
integrative negotiation
irritators
non-verbal attending
brainwriting
34. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
relevant polarity framing
options
premature consessions
perseverance effect
35. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
argument dilution
options
ways to generate options to a problem
problem solving model
36. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
setting limits
false conflict or illusory conflict
impossibilty theorem
base rates
37. The union of both parties issue sets
setting limits
reflections
reservation price
issue mix
38. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
exploration of options
ZOPA
key steps in integrative negotiation
39. Members who are attracted to particular members
relevant polarity framing
common identity groups
common bond groups
errors that prevent agreement
40. Based on consistency of behvior
communication in negotiaion
contingency contracts
deterrence based trust
active listening
41. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
irritators
impossibilty theorem
horizon thinkng
active listening
42. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
dispositional attribution
equal concession negotiaitor
relevant polarity framing
errors that prevent agreement
43. Working harder in a group
social striving
defend/attack spirals
inductive reasoning
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
44. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
GRIP goals
ways to generate options to a problem
premature consessions
individual collectivism
45. Proceed towards one answer
convergent thinking
barrier to agreement
reservation price
common bond groups
46. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
verbal minimal encouragers
unbundling
setting limits
identification based trust
47. Working less hard in a group
enlightened negotiator
base rates
inductive reasoning
social loafing
48. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
setting limits
false conflict or illusory conflict
common identity groups
joint gain
49. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
sequence planning
seller status framing
inductive reasoning
knowledge based trust
50. Means by which people influence others
deterrence based trust
integrative negotiation
egalitarianism hierarchy
false conflict or illusory conflict