SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The strenght of positive relations within a team
tunnel vision
illusory correlation
joint gain
cohension
2. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
key steps in integrative negotiation
identification based trust
false conflict or illusory conflict
sunk cost framing
3. Clients are treated like partners
partnership model
non-verbal attending
relationship issues
multiparty negotiations
4. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
common bond groups
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
barrier to agreement
errors that prevent agreement
5. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
circular logrolli
exploration of options
joint gain
enlightened negotiator
6. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
cohension
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
integrative negotiation
7. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
social loafing
an interest in negotiation
active listening activities
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
8. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
illusion of transparecy
inert knowledge problem
walk away alternative
integrative negotiation
9. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
contingency contracts
legitimacy
illusion of transparecy
egalitarianism hierarchy
10. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
tunnel vision
cognitive route
enlightened negotiator
social striving
11. Members who are attracted to the group
inductive reasoning
common identity groups
verbal minimal encouragers
false conflict or illusory conflict
12. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
equal concession negotiaitor
commitment
walk away alternative
reflections
13. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
cohension
brainwriting
partnership model
divergent thinking
14. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
integrative negotiation
GRIP goals
tunnel vision
irritators
15. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
reflections
partnership model
non-verbal attending
16. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
individual collectivism
cohension
brainwriting
exploration of options
17. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
integrative negotiation
walk away alternative
key steps in integrative negotiation
multiparty negotiations
18. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
key steps in integrative negotiation
illusory correlation
sequence vs. issue planning
ZOPA
19. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
flower child negotiator
integrative negotiation
social loafing
active listening
20. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
inductive reasoning
multiparty negotiations
sunk cost framing
an interest in negotiation
21. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
reservation price
tunnel vision
reflections
perseverance effect
22. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
aspect ratio framing
premature consessions
Particularism
23. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
equal concession negotiaitor
relationship issues
functional fixedness
joint gain
24. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
endowment effect
old fashioned negotiator
ZOPA
irritators
25. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
illusory correlation
active listening activities
logrolling
legitimacy
26. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
identification based trust
seller status framing
barrier to agreement
relevant polarity framing
27. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
false conflict or illusory conflict
key steps in integrative negotiation
reservation price
sequence planning
28. Out of the box thinking
problem solving model
endowment effect
gamblers fallacy
divergent thinking
29. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
knowledge based trust
divergent thinking
commitment
cognitive route
30. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
ZOPA
active listening
knowledge based trust
a position in negotiation
31. What you say you want - your solution
a position in negotiation
sequence planning
aspect ratio framing
affective route
32. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
setting limits
seller status framing
integrative negotiation
ZOPA
33. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
brainwriting
irritators
unbundling
tunnel vision
34. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
cohension
equal concession negotiaitor
problem solving model
impossibilty theorem
35. The process of drawing logical conclusions
relevant polarity framing
an interest in negotiation
deductive reasoning
cohension
36. Proceed towards one answer
convergent thinking
walk away alternative
options
integrative negotiation
37. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
ways to generate options to a problem
nonspecific compensation
Particularism
key components in Negotiation
38. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
common bond groups
reservation price
options
identification based trust
39. Making projections about future outcomes
inductive reasoning
base rates
horizon thinkng
integrative negotiation
40. Members who are attracted to particular members
sequence vs. issue planning
common bond groups
barrier to agreement
false conflict or illusory conflict
41. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
cohension
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
distributive negotiations
enlightened negotiator
42. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
aspect ratio framing
impossibilty theorem
nonspecific compensation
cognitive route
43. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
tunnel vision
dispositional attribution
errors that prevent agreement
problem solving model
44. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
partnership model
reflections
convergent thinking
endowment effect
45. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
integrative negotiation
affective route
commitment
legitimacy
46. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
dispositional attribution
sunk cost framing
logrolling
endowment effect
47. The union of both parties issue sets
defend/attack spirals
multiphase negotiations
setting limits
issue mix
48. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
ZOPA
options
GRIP goals
illusion of transparecy
49. See invalid correlations between events
illusory correlation
tunnel vision
a position in negotiation
convergent thinking
50. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
defend/attack spirals
dispositional attribution
common identity groups
contingency contracts