SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
irritators
partnership model
errors that prevent agreement
false conflict or illusory conflict
2. The strenght of positive relations within a team
nonspecific compensation
cohension
individual collectivism
logrolling
3. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
dispositional attribution
convergent thinking
setting limits
inert knowledge problem
4. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
inductive reasoning
relationship issues
contingency contracts
active listening
5. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
reflections
functional fixedness
deductive reasoning
perseverance effect
6. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
cohension
barrier to agreement
contingency contracts
reflections
7. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
key steps in integrative negotiation
pivotal power
logrolling
inert knowledge problem
8. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
gamblers fallacy
logrolling
relevant polarity framing
impossibilty theorem
9. Out of the box thinking
sunk cost framing
seller status framing
divergent thinking
contingency contracts
10. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
enlightened negotiator
GRIP goals
barrier to agreement
verbal minimal encouragers
11. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
egalitarianism hierarchy
perseverance effect
inert knowledge problem
illusory correlation
12. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
sunk cost framing
commitment
deductive reasoning
partnership model
13. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
pivotal power
seller status framing
sunk cost framing
dispositional attribution
14. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
Particularism
perseverance effect
reflections
functional fixedness
15. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
commitment
premature consessions
ZOPA
circular logrolli
16. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
affective route
multiparty negotiations
17. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
divergent thinking
ZOPA
false conflict or illusory conflict
active listening
18. The union of both parties issue sets
sequence vs. issue planning
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
issue mix
social loafing
19. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
individual collectivism
options
key steps in integrative negotiation
defend/attack spirals
20. What you say you want - your solution
inductive reasoning
a position in negotiation
contingency contracts
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
21. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
knowledge based trust
relationship issues
active listening activities
dispositional attribution
22. Working harder in a group
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
problem solving model
social striving
BATNA
23. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
sequence planning
sequence vs. issue planning
illusion of transparecy
problem solving model
24. Making projections about future outcomes
ZOPA
partnership model
horizon thinkng
brainwriting
25. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
contingency contracts
false conflict or illusory conflict
issue mix
impossibilty theorem
26. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
false conflict or illusory conflict
nonspecific compensation
tunnel vision
unbundling
27. Based on intuition and emotion
affective route
commitment
false conflict or illusory conflict
active listening activities
28. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
functional fixedness
cohension
multiphase negotiations
distributive negotiations
29. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
tunnel vision
multiphase negotiations
Particularism
identification based trust
30. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
equal concession negotiaitor
convergent thinking
inductive reasoning
multiparty negotiations
31. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
options
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
multiparty negotiations
sequence planning
32. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
illusory correlation
egalitarianism hierarchy
walk away alternative
non-verbal attending
33. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
nonspecific compensation
premature consessions
false conflict or illusory conflict
aspect ratio framing
34. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
nonspecific compensation
aspect ratio framing
common bond groups
integrative negotiation
35. The process of drawing logical conclusions
deterrence based trust
deductive reasoning
social loafing
inductive reasoning
36. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
nonspecific compensation
gamblers fallacy
egalitarianism hierarchy
legitimacy
37. Based on consistency of behvior
deterrence based trust
integrative negotiation
joint gain
irritators
38. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
reservation price
aspect ratio framing
convergent thinking
old fashioned negotiator
39. Expand the amount of available resources
old fashioned negotiator
integrative negotiation
horizon thinkng
irritators
40. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
flower child negotiator
brainwriting
common bond groups
gamblers fallacy
41. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
deterrence based trust
options
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
exploration of options
42. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
inductive reasoning
Particularism
reflections
legitimacy
43. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
circular logrolli
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
dispositional attribution
pivotal power
44. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
enlightened negotiator
relationship issues
options
errors that prevent agreement
45. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
problem solving model
sequence planning
knowledge based trust
illusion of transparecy
46. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
walk away alternative
relevant polarity framing
enlightened negotiator
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
47. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
walk away alternative
convergent thinking
sequence planning
contingency contracts
48. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
commitment
non-verbal attending
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
social loafing
49. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
exploration of options
sequence vs. issue planning
deductive reasoning
dispositional attribution
50. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
partnership model
deterrence based trust
reflections
seller status framing