SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
equal concession negotiaitor
sequence planning
dispositional attribution
problem solving model
2. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
key components in Negotiation
relationship issues
ZOPA
common bond groups
3. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
horizon thinkng
non-verbal attending
inert knowledge problem
old fashioned negotiator
4. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
contingency contracts
horizon thinkng
multiparty negotiations
individual collectivism
5. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
aspect ratio framing
errors that prevent agreement
ZOPA
options
6. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
key steps in integrative negotiation
impossibilty theorem
exploration of options
relationship issues
7. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
setting limits
verbal minimal encouragers
inductive reasoning
legitimacy
8. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
argument dilution
pivotal power
walk away alternative
distributive negotiations
9. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
old fashioned negotiator
affective route
sequence planning
illusion of transparecy
10. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
base rates
reciprocity principle
convergent thinking
common identity groups
11. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
partnership model
false conflict or illusory conflict
GRIP goals
relevant polarity framing
12. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
illusory correlation
sequence planning
common bond groups
gamblers fallacy
13. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
convergent thinking
sequence planning
functional fixedness
relationship issues
14. What you really care about - wants needs etc
an interest in negotiation
individual collectivism
Particularism
convergent thinking
15. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
logrolling
relevant polarity framing
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
functional fixedness
16. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
defend/attack spirals
social striving
inert knowledge problem
walk away alternative
17. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
errors that prevent agreement
a position in negotiation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
18. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
common identity groups
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
brainwriting
multiparty negotiations
19. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
a position in negotiation
active listening activities
inductive reasoning
multiparty negotiations
20. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
cognitive route
relevant polarity framing
argument dilution
tunnel vision
21. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
irritators
seller status framing
inductive reasoning
brainwriting
22. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
logrolling
a position in negotiation
reciprocity principle
enlightened negotiator
23. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
base rates
partnership model
defend/attack spirals
ZOPA
24. Working harder in a group
Particularism
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
reservation price
social striving
25. Working less hard in a group
common identity groups
egalitarianism hierarchy
social loafing
common bond groups
26. Clients are treated like partners
an interest in negotiation
partnership model
barrier to agreement
social striving
27. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
nonspecific compensation
non-verbal attending
exploration of options
communication in negotiaion
28. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
exploration of options
verbal minimal encouragers
distributive negotiations
setting limits
29. The process of drawing logical conclusions
illusory correlation
deductive reasoning
tunnel vision
irritators
30. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
base rates
problem solving model
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
egalitarianism hierarchy
31. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
verbal minimal encouragers
social striving
active listening
multiparty negotiations
32. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
communication in negotiaion
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
social striving
dispositional attribution
33. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
unbundling
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
individual collectivism
legitimacy
34. The strenght of positive relations within a team
exploration of options
commitment
equal concession negotiaitor
cohension
35. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
gamblers fallacy
key components in Negotiation
contingency contracts
relationship issues
36. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
argument dilution
illusion of transparecy
verbal minimal encouragers
37. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
inert knowledge problem
logrolling
non-verbal attending
nonspecific compensation
38. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
Particularism
active listening activities
relevant polarity framing
multiphase negotiations
39. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
equal concession negotiaitor
sequence vs. issue planning
barrier to agreement
sunk cost framing
40. See invalid correlations between events
gamblers fallacy
irritators
argument dilution
illusory correlation
41. What you say you want - your solution
circular logrolli
common bond groups
a position in negotiation
unbundling
42. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
false conflict or illusory conflict
circular logrolli
sunk cost framing
exploration of options
43. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
communication in negotiaion
barrier to agreement
equal concession negotiaitor
cognitive route
44. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
joint gain
problem solving model
sunk cost framing
logrolling
45. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
equal concession negotiaitor
distributive negotiations
active listening
social striving
46. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
sequence vs. issue planning
problem solving model
cognitive route
logrolling
47. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
illusion of transparecy
knowledge based trust
walk away alternative
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
48. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
impossibilty theorem
cognitive route
common identity groups
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
49. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
social loafing
gamblers fallacy
pivotal power
commitment
50. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
perseverance effect
flower child negotiator
brainwriting
reservation price