SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
endowment effect
pivotal power
gamblers fallacy
walk away alternative
2. Out of the box thinking
multiphase negotiations
Particularism
divergent thinking
illusory correlation
3. Based on consistency of behvior
ways to generate options to a problem
active listening activities
deterrence based trust
sunk cost framing
4. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
relevant polarity framing
ZOPA
argument dilution
sequence planning
5. The strenght of positive relations within a team
perseverance effect
egalitarianism hierarchy
false conflict or illusory conflict
cohension
6. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
perseverance effect
reflections
affective route
enlightened negotiator
7. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
nonspecific compensation
knowledge based trust
gamblers fallacy
reflections
8. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
Particularism
setting limits
premature consessions
9. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
aspect ratio framing
deductive reasoning
inductive reasoning
non-verbal attending
10. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
logrolling
ways to generate options to a problem
setting limits
relevant polarity framing
11. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
multiparty negotiations
a position in negotiation
non-verbal attending
flower child negotiator
12. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
integrative negotiation
circular logrolli
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
reservation price
13. What you say you want - your solution
dispositional attribution
irritators
aspect ratio framing
a position in negotiation
14. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
walk away alternative
joint gain
relationship issues
15. One that calls into question anothers character
integrative negotiation
dispositional attribution
non-verbal attending
key steps in integrative negotiation
16. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
communication in negotiaion
common identity groups
convergent thinking
relationship issues
17. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
contingency contracts
errors that prevent agreement
joint gain
relationship issues
18. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
barrier to agreement
illusion of transparecy
tunnel vision
communication in negotiaion
19. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
integrative negotiation
errors that prevent agreement
base rates
premature consessions
20. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
inductive reasoning
impossibilty theorem
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
deductive reasoning
21. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
key components in Negotiation
BATNA
false conflict or illusory conflict
illusion of transparecy
22. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
argument dilution
joint gain
brainwriting
options
23. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
knowledge based trust
sequence planning
legitimacy
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
24. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
divergent thinking
errors that prevent agreement
inductive reasoning
seller status framing
25. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
illusory correlation
logrolling
integrative negotiation
false conflict or illusory conflict
26. Clients are treated like partners
exploration of options
egalitarianism hierarchy
partnership model
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
27. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
multiparty negotiations
GRIP goals
seller status framing
joint gain
28. See invalid correlations between events
base rates
sunk cost framing
illusion of transparecy
illusory correlation
29. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
endowment effect
sequence vs. issue planning
inert knowledge problem
knowledge based trust
30. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
social striving
multiphase negotiations
brainwriting
defend/attack spirals
31. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
sequence planning
illusory correlation
unbundling
active listening
32. The process of drawing logical conclusions
contingency contracts
setting limits
deductive reasoning
active listening
33. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
old fashioned negotiator
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
deterrence based trust
GRIP goals
34. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
active listening activities
key steps in integrative negotiation
enlightened negotiator
illusion of transparecy
35. What you really care about - wants needs etc
false conflict or illusory conflict
an interest in negotiation
common identity groups
multiphase negotiations
36. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
distributive negotiations
cohension
inductive reasoning
endowment effect
37. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
social striving
irritators
circular logrolli
BATNA
38. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
enlightened negotiator
sequence planning
GRIP goals
key steps in integrative negotiation
39. Based on intuition and emotion
endowment effect
affective route
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
social striving
40. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
inert knowledge problem
inductive reasoning
dispositional attribution
multiparty negotiations
41. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
egalitarianism hierarchy
tunnel vision
exploration of options
flower child negotiator
42. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
key steps in integrative negotiation
options
identification based trust
knowledge based trust
43. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
dispositional attribution
knowledge based trust
nonspecific compensation
joint gain
44. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
impossibilty theorem
sunk cost framing
identification based trust
sequence vs. issue planning
45. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
contingency contracts
distributive negotiations
equal concession negotiaitor
Particularism
46. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
multiparty negotiations
irritators
illusion of transparecy
false conflict or illusory conflict
47. Expand the amount of available resources
defend/attack spirals
pivotal power
integrative negotiation
legitimacy
48. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
sequence vs. issue planning
active listening
integrative negotiation
divergent thinking
49. The union of both parties issue sets
knowledge based trust
illusory correlation
issue mix
enlightened negotiator
50. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
tunnel vision
argument dilution
joint gain
equal concession negotiaitor