SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
relevant polarity framing
active listening
flower child negotiator
aspect ratio framing
2. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
an interest in negotiation
common identity groups
errors that prevent agreement
reservation price
3. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
social loafing
egalitarianism hierarchy
joint gain
inductive reasoning
4. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
integrative negotiation
defend/attack spirals
inert knowledge problem
individual collectivism
5. The process of drawing logical conclusions
relationship issues
flower child negotiator
deductive reasoning
active listening activities
6. One that calls into question anothers character
dispositional attribution
logrolling
verbal minimal encouragers
cohension
7. Making projections about future outcomes
deductive reasoning
issue mix
horizon thinkng
contingency contracts
8. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
commitment
integrative negotiation
walk away alternative
exploration of options
9. Clients are treated like partners
reflections
partnership model
dispositional attribution
integrative negotiation
10. Proceed towards one answer
reciprocity principle
partnership model
sequence vs. issue planning
convergent thinking
11. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
circular logrolli
old fashioned negotiator
irritators
partnership model
12. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
GRIP goals
reflections
functional fixedness
deterrence based trust
13. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
key steps in integrative negotiation
GRIP goals
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
argument dilution
14. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
aspect ratio framing
irritators
setting limits
reciprocity principle
15. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
ZOPA
active listening
legitimacy
communication in negotiaion
16. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
social loafing
perseverance effect
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
exploration of options
17. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
impossibilty theorem
social loafing
multiparty negotiations
errors that prevent agreement
18. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
irritators
illusion of transparecy
enlightened negotiator
false conflict or illusory conflict
19. Out of the box thinking
exploration of options
divergent thinking
equal concession negotiaitor
relationship issues
20. See invalid correlations between events
integrative negotiation
distributive negotiations
pivotal power
illusory correlation
21. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
reservation price
logrolling
enlightened negotiator
flower child negotiator
22. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
divergent thinking
BATNA
inductive reasoning
23. Based on consistency of behvior
reflections
logrolling
key components in Negotiation
deterrence based trust
24. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
gamblers fallacy
options
relevant polarity framing
sequence vs. issue planning
25. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
integrative negotiation
key steps in integrative negotiation
flower child negotiator
equal concession negotiaitor
26. Working less hard in a group
sunk cost framing
social loafing
cognitive route
nonspecific compensation
27. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
aspect ratio framing
setting limits
integrative negotiation
contingency contracts
28. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
legitimacy
partnership model
options
relevant polarity framing
29. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
pivotal power
verbal minimal encouragers
contingency contracts
legitimacy
30. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
active listening
setting limits
contingency contracts
commitment
31. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
walk away alternative
irritators
impossibilty theorem
flower child negotiator
32. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
BATNA
common bond groups
tunnel vision
cognitive route
33. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
pivotal power
communication in negotiaion
inductive reasoning
impossibilty theorem
34. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
ways to generate options to a problem
key steps in integrative negotiation
deductive reasoning
cohension
35. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
reservation price
a position in negotiation
sequence vs. issue planning
false conflict or illusory conflict
36. Members who are attracted to the group
aspect ratio framing
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
legitimacy
common identity groups
37. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
key components in Negotiation
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
active listening activities
walk away alternative
38. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
seller status framing
tunnel vision
circular logrolli
BATNA
39. Means by which people influence others
ZOPA
egalitarianism hierarchy
relevant polarity framing
an interest in negotiation
40. The union of both parties issue sets
issue mix
setting limits
inductive reasoning
gamblers fallacy
41. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
inert knowledge problem
logrolling
base rates
multiphase negotiations
42. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
legitimacy
identification based trust
problem solving model
walk away alternative
43. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
exploration of options
deductive reasoning
options
sequence planning
44. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
active listening activities
commitment
perseverance effect
legitimacy
45. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
communication in negotiaion
flower child negotiator
distributive negotiations
defend/attack spirals
46. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
enlightened negotiator
social striving
active listening
cohension
47. Expand the amount of available resources
integrative negotiation
perseverance effect
setting limits
active listening
48. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
affective route
illusion of transparecy
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
social striving
49. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
multiparty negotiations
horizon thinkng
old fashioned negotiator
unbundling
50. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
partnership model
common bond groups
a position in negotiation
impossibilty theorem