SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
sunk cost framing
impossibilty theorem
old fashioned negotiator
barrier to agreement
2. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
individual collectivism
common identity groups
setting limits
Particularism
3. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
sequence planning
impossibilty theorem
common identity groups
errors that prevent agreement
4. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
enlightened negotiator
defend/attack spirals
old fashioned negotiator
gamblers fallacy
5. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
endowment effect
integrative negotiation
circular logrolli
aspect ratio framing
6. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
endowment effect
walk away alternative
unbundling
social loafing
7. Means by which people influence others
egalitarianism hierarchy
ZOPA
sunk cost framing
an interest in negotiation
8. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
cognitive route
logrolling
key steps in integrative negotiation
perseverance effect
9. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
social striving
non-verbal attending
knowledge based trust
individual collectivism
10. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
commitment
integrative negotiation
reservation price
options
11. Expand the amount of available resources
reflections
communication in negotiaion
integrative negotiation
deductive reasoning
12. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
circular logrolli
reservation price
perseverance effect
13. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
cognitive route
reflections
partnership model
deductive reasoning
14. What you say you want - your solution
a position in negotiation
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
illusory correlation
common identity groups
15. Working less hard in a group
nonspecific compensation
social loafing
endowment effect
key steps in integrative negotiation
16. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
common bond groups
legitimacy
partnership model
defend/attack spirals
17. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
non-verbal attending
cognitive route
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
pivotal power
18. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
logrolling
relevant polarity framing
base rates
tunnel vision
19. Members who are attracted to the group
functional fixedness
barrier to agreement
common identity groups
illusory correlation
20. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
irritators
inert knowledge problem
key steps in integrative negotiation
reciprocity principle
21. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
deterrence based trust
active listening
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
premature consessions
22. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
functional fixedness
seller status framing
flower child negotiator
deterrence based trust
23. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
sunk cost framing
multiparty negotiations
key components in Negotiation
gamblers fallacy
24. Out of the box thinking
active listening activities
divergent thinking
BATNA
integrative negotiation
25. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
sequence planning
flower child negotiator
inductive reasoning
BATNA
26. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
problem solving model
pivotal power
cognitive route
circular logrolli
27. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
enlightened negotiator
flower child negotiator
problem solving model
28. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
non-verbal attending
brainwriting
key components in Negotiation
errors that prevent agreement
29. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
walk away alternative
relevant polarity framing
divergent thinking
illusory correlation
30. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
ways to generate options to a problem
aspect ratio framing
inductive reasoning
problem solving model
31. Working harder in a group
social striving
unbundling
nonspecific compensation
active listening
32. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
brainwriting
walk away alternative
social striving
equal concession negotiaitor
33. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
defend/attack spirals
cohension
common identity groups
integrative negotiation
34. The strenght of positive relations within a team
relationship issues
cohension
barrier to agreement
distributive negotiations
35. Making projections about future outcomes
Particularism
communication in negotiaion
horizon thinkng
sunk cost framing
36. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
dispositional attribution
ways to generate options to a problem
seller status framing
inductive reasoning
37. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
cognitive route
tunnel vision
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
a position in negotiation
38. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
key steps in integrative negotiation
enlightened negotiator
commitment
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
39. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
sequence planning
multiphase negotiations
irritators
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
40. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
pivotal power
brainwriting
nonspecific compensation
functional fixedness
41. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
sequence planning
endowment effect
distributive negotiations
unbundling
42. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
cognitive route
premature consessions
seller status framing
active listening activities
43. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
GRIP goals
gamblers fallacy
reflections
integrative negotiation
44. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
joint gain
multiparty negotiations
inductive reasoning
horizon thinkng
45. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
contingency contracts
pivotal power
illusory correlation
social loafing
46. What you really care about - wants needs etc
circular logrolli
logrolling
an interest in negotiation
aspect ratio framing
47. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
endowment effect
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
multiparty negotiations
deterrence based trust
48. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
gamblers fallacy
verbal minimal encouragers
dispositional attribution
unbundling
49. The process of drawing logical conclusions
ZOPA
cohension
deterrence based trust
deductive reasoning
50. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
egalitarianism hierarchy
seller status framing
sequence vs. issue planning
circular logrolli