SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
ZOPA
affective route
Particularism
relationship issues
2. Means by which people influence others
egalitarianism hierarchy
integrative negotiation
illusory correlation
inductive reasoning
3. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
communication in negotiaion
defend/attack spirals
false conflict or illusory conflict
illusory correlation
4. Making projections about future outcomes
premature consessions
dispositional attribution
horizon thinkng
non-verbal attending
5. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
sequence planning
nonspecific compensation
active listening activities
key components in Negotiation
6. What you really care about - wants needs etc
convergent thinking
walk away alternative
an interest in negotiation
distributive negotiations
7. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
key components in Negotiation
contingency contracts
cognitive route
an interest in negotiation
8. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
ways to generate options to a problem
social striving
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
brainwriting
9. Clients are treated like partners
perseverance effect
partnership model
knowledge based trust
relationship issues
10. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
Particularism
reservation price
non-verbal attending
walk away alternative
11. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
false conflict or illusory conflict
legitimacy
dispositional attribution
old fashioned negotiator
12. One that calls into question anothers character
common identity groups
reservation price
dispositional attribution
commitment
13. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
options
barrier to agreement
social striving
problem solving model
14. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
illusory correlation
argument dilution
multiphase negotiations
ZOPA
15. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
functional fixedness
inductive reasoning
ways to generate options to a problem
reservation price
16. See invalid correlations between events
illusory correlation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
partnership model
brainwriting
17. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
setting limits
old fashioned negotiator
unbundling
ways to generate options to a problem
18. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
legitimacy
barrier to agreement
irritators
relevant polarity framing
19. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
key steps in integrative negotiation
sunk cost framing
pivotal power
key components in Negotiation
20. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
tunnel vision
enlightened negotiator
ways to generate options to a problem
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
21. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
functional fixedness
endowment effect
illusion of transparecy
multiphase negotiations
22. The union of both parties issue sets
active listening
issue mix
enlightened negotiator
identification based trust
23. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
reservation price
argument dilution
GRIP goals
24. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
base rates
premature consessions
multiphase negotiations
convergent thinking
25. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
cohension
issue mix
tunnel vision
options
26. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
exploration of options
partnership model
active listening activities
impossibilty theorem
27. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
GRIP goals
unbundling
communication in negotiaion
premature consessions
28. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
sequence planning
inductive reasoning
irritators
functional fixedness
29. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
setting limits
dispositional attribution
BATNA
identification based trust
30. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
sequence vs. issue planning
old fashioned negotiator
reflections
false conflict or illusory conflict
31. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
sunk cost framing
egalitarianism hierarchy
integrative negotiation
irritators
32. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
an interest in negotiation
multiphase negotiations
flower child negotiator
GRIP goals
33. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
an interest in negotiation
functional fixedness
sunk cost framing
reservation price
34. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
sequence vs. issue planning
GRIP goals
deterrence based trust
relationship issues
35. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
functional fixedness
multiparty negotiations
active listening activities
convergent thinking
36. What you say you want - your solution
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
a position in negotiation
tunnel vision
affective route
37. The process of drawing logical conclusions
deductive reasoning
an interest in negotiation
false conflict or illusory conflict
convergent thinking
38. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
exploration of options
perseverance effect
verbal minimal encouragers
individual collectivism
39. Out of the box thinking
a position in negotiation
key components in Negotiation
common identity groups
divergent thinking
40. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
inert knowledge problem
endowment effect
seller status framing
aspect ratio framing
41. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
old fashioned negotiator
convergent thinking
dispositional attribution
social loafing
42. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
a position in negotiation
premature consessions
old fashioned negotiator
gamblers fallacy
43. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
nonspecific compensation
common bond groups
logrolling
enlightened negotiator
44. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
perseverance effect
ZOPA
endowment effect
partnership model
45. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
walk away alternative
tunnel vision
convergent thinking
46. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
illusory correlation
social striving
premature consessions
47. Working less hard in a group
horizon thinkng
social loafing
seller status framing
false conflict or illusory conflict
48. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
Particularism
brainwriting
walk away alternative
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
49. Members who are attracted to particular members
impossibilty theorem
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
partnership model
common bond groups
50. Members who are attracted to the group
deterrence based trust
dispositional attribution
common identity groups
inductive reasoning