SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
enlightened negotiator
irritators
false conflict or illusory conflict
illusion of transparecy
2. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
contingency contracts
illusion of transparecy
relationship issues
sunk cost framing
3. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
old fashioned negotiator
a position in negotiation
sunk cost framing
inductive reasoning
4. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
distributive negotiations
premature consessions
GRIP goals
a position in negotiation
5. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
contingency contracts
perseverance effect
inductive reasoning
aspect ratio framing
6. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
communication in negotiaion
nonspecific compensation
unbundling
an interest in negotiation
7. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
a position in negotiation
integrative negotiation
BATNA
nonspecific compensation
8. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
common identity groups
integrative negotiation
Particularism
premature consessions
9. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
circular logrolli
inductive reasoning
sunk cost framing
cohension
10. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
issue mix
knowledge based trust
relevant polarity framing
11. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
multiparty negotiations
unbundling
problem solving model
knowledge based trust
12. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
functional fixedness
individual collectivism
ways to generate options to a problem
convergent thinking
13. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
social loafing
errors that prevent agreement
options
contingency contracts
14. Expand the amount of available resources
aspect ratio framing
errors that prevent agreement
integrative negotiation
contingency contracts
15. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
horizon thinkng
setting limits
partnership model
16. Working less hard in a group
verbal minimal encouragers
deterrence based trust
social loafing
contingency contracts
17. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
legitimacy
walk away alternative
equal concession negotiaitor
inductive reasoning
18. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
partnership model
non-verbal attending
knowledge based trust
convergent thinking
19. See invalid correlations between events
illusory correlation
irritators
multiphase negotiations
premature consessions
20. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
flower child negotiator
affective route
sequence vs. issue planning
egalitarianism hierarchy
21. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
options
identification based trust
inert knowledge problem
tunnel vision
22. What you say you want - your solution
deterrence based trust
aspect ratio framing
a position in negotiation
joint gain
23. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
knowledge based trust
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
illusion of transparecy
exploration of options
24. Members who are attracted to particular members
non-verbal attending
circular logrolli
errors that prevent agreement
common bond groups
25. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
pivotal power
contingency contracts
enlightened negotiator
barrier to agreement
26. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
inductive reasoning
active listening
impossibilty theorem
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
27. Members who are attracted to the group
ways to generate options to a problem
a position in negotiation
options
common identity groups
28. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
inductive reasoning
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
active listening
barrier to agreement
29. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
unbundling
problem solving model
communication in negotiaion
relevant polarity framing
30. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
reflections
relationship issues
individual collectivism
convergent thinking
31. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
inert knowledge problem
functional fixedness
defend/attack spirals
social loafing
32. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
non-verbal attending
setting limits
exploration of options
sunk cost framing
33. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
deterrence based trust
exploration of options
identification based trust
an interest in negotiation
34. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
verbal minimal encouragers
equal concession negotiaitor
walk away alternative
active listening
35. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
verbal minimal encouragers
cohension
enlightened negotiator
integrative negotiation
36. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
issue mix
deductive reasoning
illusion of transparecy
distributive negotiations
37. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
unbundling
issue mix
multiparty negotiations
irritators
38. Means by which people influence others
deterrence based trust
egalitarianism hierarchy
cohension
issue mix
39. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
nonspecific compensation
reflections
logrolling
sunk cost framing
40. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
partnership model
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
divergent thinking
logrolling
41. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
illusion of transparecy
knowledge based trust
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
active listening activities
42. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
Particularism
ways to generate options to a problem
identification based trust
legitimacy
43. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
legitimacy
non-verbal attending
cohension
exploration of options
44. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
tunnel vision
impossibilty theorem
non-verbal attending
affective route
45. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
active listening
cognitive route
identification based trust
joint gain
46. Working harder in a group
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
social striving
inductive reasoning
unbundling
47. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
defend/attack spirals
non-verbal attending
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
perseverance effect
48. Based on consistency of behvior
deterrence based trust
key components in Negotiation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
identification based trust
49. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
a position in negotiation
commitment
sequence vs. issue planning
knowledge based trust
50. The process of drawing logical conclusions
problem solving model
deductive reasoning
dispositional attribution
contingency contracts