SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
integrative negotiation
tunnel vision
individual collectivism
problem solving model
2. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
integrative negotiation
aspect ratio framing
key steps in integrative negotiation
inductive reasoning
3. Working harder in a group
commitment
an interest in negotiation
relationship issues
social striving
4. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
cohension
partnership model
ZOPA
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
5. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
premature consessions
setting limits
social striving
joint gain
6. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
errors that prevent agreement
relationship issues
common identity groups
egalitarianism hierarchy
7. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
non-verbal attending
cohension
reciprocity principle
sequence planning
8. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
relevant polarity framing
base rates
ways to generate options to a problem
pivotal power
9. Out of the box thinking
divergent thinking
deductive reasoning
setting limits
inductive reasoning
10. Based on intuition and emotion
communication in negotiaion
brainwriting
BATNA
affective route
11. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
inductive reasoning
active listening
partnership model
12. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
active listening
horizon thinkng
inductive reasoning
sequence vs. issue planning
13. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
illusory correlation
logrolling
options
nonspecific compensation
14. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
reservation price
Particularism
defend/attack spirals
base rates
15. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
flower child negotiator
multiparty negotiations
irritators
unbundling
16. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
pivotal power
key steps in integrative negotiation
distributive negotiations
key components in Negotiation
17. Clients are treated like partners
false conflict or illusory conflict
partnership model
individual collectivism
egalitarianism hierarchy
18. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
relevant polarity framing
perseverance effect
reciprocity principle
convergent thinking
19. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
inert knowledge problem
sequence vs. issue planning
non-verbal attending
relationship issues
20. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
inductive reasoning
cognitive route
social striving
illusion of transparecy
21. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
false conflict or illusory conflict
active listening activities
argument dilution
commitment
22. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
equal concession negotiaitor
seller status framing
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
inductive reasoning
23. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
reflections
circular logrolli
exploration of options
convergent thinking
24. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
impossibilty theorem
gamblers fallacy
seller status framing
divergent thinking
25. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
multiphase negotiations
pivotal power
distributive negotiations
flower child negotiator
26. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
multiparty negotiations
contingency contracts
inert knowledge problem
defend/attack spirals
27. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
key components in Negotiation
pivotal power
setting limits
perseverance effect
28. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
inductive reasoning
aspect ratio framing
endowment effect
premature consessions
29. Working less hard in a group
logrolling
pivotal power
social loafing
endowment effect
30. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
ZOPA
brainwriting
tunnel vision
inductive reasoning
31. What you say you want - your solution
identification based trust
social loafing
logrolling
a position in negotiation
32. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
errors that prevent agreement
affective route
reciprocity principle
perseverance effect
33. The union of both parties issue sets
barrier to agreement
issue mix
nonspecific compensation
deductive reasoning
34. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
tunnel vision
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
knowledge based trust
35. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
nonspecific compensation
social striving
reflections
unbundling
36. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
nonspecific compensation
divergent thinking
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
relevant polarity framing
37. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
contingency contracts
issue mix
irritators
38. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
BATNA
cognitive route
logrolling
gamblers fallacy
39. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
perseverance effect
sunk cost framing
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
ways to generate options to a problem
40. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
false conflict or illusory conflict
integrative negotiation
distributive negotiations
inert knowledge problem
41. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
issue mix
multiphase negotiations
circular logrolli
social loafing
42. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
individual collectivism
commitment
argument dilution
legitimacy
43. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
argument dilution
integrative negotiation
social striving
unbundling
44. Expand the amount of available resources
aspect ratio framing
seller status framing
integrative negotiation
deterrence based trust
45. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
multiparty negotiations
individual collectivism
key steps in integrative negotiation
pivotal power
46. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
integrative negotiation
logrolling
setting limits
common identity groups
47. Members who are attracted to the group
premature consessions
old fashioned negotiator
common identity groups
social striving
48. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
active listening
defend/attack spirals
aspect ratio framing
setting limits
49. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
problem solving model
base rates
aspect ratio framing
unbundling
50. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
gamblers fallacy
identification based trust
unbundling
contingency contracts