SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Means by which people influence others
ZOPA
egalitarianism hierarchy
false conflict or illusory conflict
seller status framing
2. The union of both parties issue sets
issue mix
legitimacy
gamblers fallacy
illusion of transparecy
3. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
circular logrolli
gamblers fallacy
reservation price
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
4. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
reflections
affective route
distributive negotiations
GRIP goals
5. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
gamblers fallacy
perseverance effect
irritators
base rates
6. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
identification based trust
barrier to agreement
pivotal power
distributive negotiations
7. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
active listening
impossibilty theorem
old fashioned negotiator
endowment effect
8. Working harder in a group
ZOPA
social striving
individual collectivism
common bond groups
9. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
problem solving model
sunk cost framing
gamblers fallacy
individual collectivism
10. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
partnership model
active listening activities
perseverance effect
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
11. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
integrative negotiation
ZOPA
inert knowledge problem
GRIP goals
12. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
individual collectivism
commitment
inductive reasoning
identification based trust
13. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
gamblers fallacy
sunk cost framing
sequence vs. issue planning
horizon thinkng
14. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
joint gain
active listening
inductive reasoning
ways to generate options to a problem
15. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
issue mix
divergent thinking
flower child negotiator
legitimacy
16. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
equal concession negotiaitor
key components in Negotiation
relevant polarity framing
base rates
17. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
errors that prevent agreement
communication in negotiaion
individual collectivism
functional fixedness
18. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
key steps in integrative negotiation
ways to generate options to a problem
distributive negotiations
issue mix
19. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
relevant polarity framing
brainwriting
circular logrolli
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
20. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
GRIP goals
non-verbal attending
barrier to agreement
tunnel vision
21. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
distributive negotiations
barrier to agreement
argument dilution
endowment effect
22. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
BATNA
irritators
illusion of transparecy
convergent thinking
23. Proceed towards one answer
convergent thinking
problem solving model
active listening activities
old fashioned negotiator
24. Expand the amount of available resources
integrative negotiation
inductive reasoning
false conflict or illusory conflict
logrolling
25. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
problem solving model
partnership model
pivotal power
multiparty negotiations
26. Out of the box thinking
Particularism
base rates
irritators
divergent thinking
27. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
cognitive route
egalitarianism hierarchy
walk away alternative
brainwriting
28. What you say you want - your solution
a position in negotiation
horizon thinkng
walk away alternative
inductive reasoning
29. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
tunnel vision
key components in Negotiation
inductive reasoning
seller status framing
30. Working less hard in a group
commitment
brainwriting
social loafing
deductive reasoning
31. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
inert knowledge problem
perseverance effect
egalitarianism hierarchy
distributive negotiations
32. Members who are attracted to the group
logrolling
false conflict or illusory conflict
common identity groups
social loafing
33. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
barrier to agreement
a position in negotiation
old fashioned negotiator
34. Making projections about future outcomes
individual collectivism
key steps in integrative negotiation
integrative negotiation
horizon thinkng
35. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
options
deductive reasoning
social loafing
inductive reasoning
36. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
gamblers fallacy
relationship issues
key components in Negotiation
commitment
37. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
illusion of transparecy
sequence vs. issue planning
Particularism
gamblers fallacy
38. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
Particularism
premature consessions
pivotal power
identification based trust
39. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
exploration of options
legitimacy
flower child negotiator
endowment effect
40. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
distributive negotiations
sequence vs. issue planning
walk away alternative
cognitive route
41. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
setting limits
convergent thinking
defend/attack spirals
aspect ratio framing
42. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
joint gain
GRIP goals
illusion of transparecy
aspect ratio framing
43. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
issue mix
seller status framing
relevant polarity framing
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
44. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
integrative negotiation
walk away alternative
an interest in negotiation
reciprocity principle
45. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
GRIP goals
circular logrolli
base rates
aspect ratio framing
46. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
active listening
horizon thinkng
an interest in negotiation
key steps in integrative negotiation
47. Based on intuition and emotion
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
GRIP goals
affective route
relevant polarity framing
48. Clients are treated like partners
argument dilution
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
partnership model
multiparty negotiations
49. Members who are attracted to particular members
options
common bond groups
base rates
horizon thinkng
50. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
logrolling
active listening activities
multiparty negotiations
GRIP goals