SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. One that calls into question anothers character
impossibilty theorem
dispositional attribution
Particularism
errors that prevent agreement
2. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
illusory correlation
equal concession negotiaitor
deterrence based trust
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
3. The union of both parties issue sets
non-verbal attending
issue mix
endowment effect
cognitive route
4. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
multiphase negotiations
problem solving model
tunnel vision
equal concession negotiaitor
5. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
errors that prevent agreement
joint gain
key components in Negotiation
relevant polarity framing
6. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
cohension
tunnel vision
logrolling
multiphase negotiations
7. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
walk away alternative
brainwriting
argument dilution
cohension
8. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
GRIP goals
key steps in integrative negotiation
functional fixedness
multiphase negotiations
9. Out of the box thinking
illusory correlation
social striving
joint gain
divergent thinking
10. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
horizon thinkng
inductive reasoning
cohension
11. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
seller status framing
equal concession negotiaitor
aspect ratio framing
illusion of transparecy
12. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
knowledge based trust
flower child negotiator
ways to generate options to a problem
aspect ratio framing
13. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
commitment
defend/attack spirals
sequence vs. issue planning
multiphase negotiations
14. Members who are attracted to the group
problem solving model
illusory correlation
common identity groups
flower child negotiator
15. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
functional fixedness
a position in negotiation
active listening
deductive reasoning
16. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
horizon thinkng
sunk cost framing
walk away alternative
17. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
inductive reasoning
issue mix
inert knowledge problem
exploration of options
18. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
walk away alternative
impossibilty theorem
relationship issues
setting limits
19. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
active listening
logrolling
errors that prevent agreement
non-verbal attending
20. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
circular logrolli
key steps in integrative negotiation
social striving
old fashioned negotiator
21. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
brainwriting
argument dilution
common bond groups
reciprocity principle
22. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
tunnel vision
inductive reasoning
verbal minimal encouragers
sequence vs. issue planning
23. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
barrier to agreement
active listening
integrative negotiation
reflections
24. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
base rates
perseverance effect
walk away alternative
distributive negotiations
25. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
BATNA
illusion of transparecy
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
unbundling
26. The strenght of positive relations within a team
active listening activities
key components in Negotiation
cohension
contingency contracts
27. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
illusion of transparecy
communication in negotiaion
integrative negotiation
28. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
nonspecific compensation
enlightened negotiator
horizon thinkng
walk away alternative
29. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
distributive negotiations
identification based trust
an interest in negotiation
flower child negotiator
30. Based on intuition and emotion
affective route
seller status framing
logrolling
circular logrolli
31. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
joint gain
common identity groups
options
enlightened negotiator
32. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
problem solving model
relevant polarity framing
deductive reasoning
gamblers fallacy
33. Clients are treated like partners
partnership model
base rates
active listening
convergent thinking
34. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
reflections
ZOPA
premature consessions
defend/attack spirals
35. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
deterrence based trust
identification based trust
non-verbal attending
relevant polarity framing
36. See invalid correlations between events
cohension
illusory correlation
contingency contracts
circular logrolli
37. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
reciprocity principle
a position in negotiation
inductive reasoning
affective route
38. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
identification based trust
irritators
barrier to agreement
key steps in integrative negotiation
39. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
ZOPA
reservation price
identification based trust
individual collectivism
40. The process of drawing logical conclusions
Particularism
deductive reasoning
social loafing
ways to generate options to a problem
41. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
endowment effect
communication in negotiaion
non-verbal attending
inductive reasoning
42. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
reciprocity principle
reservation price
identification based trust
43. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
multiparty negotiations
aspect ratio framing
issue mix
horizon thinkng
44. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
gamblers fallacy
tunnel vision
social loafing
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
45. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
issue mix
integrative negotiation
contingency contracts
impossibilty theorem
46. Expand the amount of available resources
integrative negotiation
aspect ratio framing
sequence vs. issue planning
key components in Negotiation
47. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
multiphase negotiations
relationship issues
integrative negotiation
errors that prevent agreement
48. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
walk away alternative
common bond groups
integrative negotiation
reservation price
49. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
joint gain
cognitive route
false conflict or illusory conflict
barrier to agreement
50. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
irritators
common identity groups
inductive reasoning
relevant polarity framing