SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
relevant polarity framing
endowment effect
dispositional attribution
impossibilty theorem
2. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
problem solving model
impossibilty theorem
verbal minimal encouragers
reservation price
3. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
flower child negotiator
impossibilty theorem
key steps in integrative negotiation
4. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
identification based trust
walk away alternative
key components in Negotiation
cohension
5. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
sunk cost framing
nonspecific compensation
inductive reasoning
sequence vs. issue planning
6. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
illusory correlation
flower child negotiator
brainwriting
multiparty negotiations
7. Based on consistency of behvior
deterrence based trust
divergent thinking
cognitive route
ways to generate options to a problem
8. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
active listening
knowledge based trust
impossibilty theorem
illusory correlation
9. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
enlightened negotiator
base rates
problem solving model
barrier to agreement
10. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
issue mix
cognitive route
barrier to agreement
pivotal power
11. See invalid correlations between events
nonspecific compensation
perseverance effect
commitment
illusory correlation
12. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
relevant polarity framing
sequence vs. issue planning
communication in negotiaion
affective route
13. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
commitment
individual collectivism
options
relevant polarity framing
14. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
partnership model
deductive reasoning
active listening activities
defend/attack spirals
15. Members who are attracted to the group
common identity groups
premature consessions
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
contingency contracts
16. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
contingency contracts
problem solving model
ways to generate options to a problem
premature consessions
17. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
cohension
enlightened negotiator
BATNA
legitimacy
18. Expand the amount of available resources
integrative negotiation
old fashioned negotiator
key components in Negotiation
a position in negotiation
19. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
inductive reasoning
reciprocity principle
BATNA
brainwriting
20. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
exploration of options
contingency contracts
partnership model
key components in Negotiation
21. Proceed towards one answer
convergent thinking
horizon thinkng
communication in negotiaion
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
22. Members who are attracted to particular members
circular logrolli
barrier to agreement
common bond groups
logrolling
23. Working harder in a group
defend/attack spirals
options
active listening
social striving
24. Working less hard in a group
social loafing
relationship issues
distributive negotiations
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
25. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
affective route
deductive reasoning
aspect ratio framing
26. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
illusory correlation
Particularism
key steps in integrative negotiation
sequence vs. issue planning
27. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
joint gain
egalitarianism hierarchy
premature consessions
false conflict or illusory conflict
28. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
common bond groups
logrolling
walk away alternative
reciprocity principle
29. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
illusion of transparecy
sequence vs. issue planning
egalitarianism hierarchy
errors that prevent agreement
30. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
reservation price
barrier to agreement
GRIP goals
31. The frequency with which some event or pattern occurs in the general population
base rates
knowledge based trust
impossibilty theorem
integrative negotiation
32. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
social loafing
reflections
ways to generate options to a problem
inductive reasoning
33. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
ZOPA
key components in Negotiation
communication in negotiaion
nonspecific compensation
34. Out of the box thinking
brainwriting
divergent thinking
individual collectivism
enlightened negotiator
35. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
base rates
unbundling
brainwriting
distributive negotiations
36. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
inductive reasoning
a position in negotiation
relationship issues
options
37. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
convergent thinking
legitimacy
argument dilution
relationship issues
38. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
brainwriting
options
ZOPA
divergent thinking
39. Clients are treated like partners
equal concession negotiaitor
gamblers fallacy
partnership model
inductive reasoning
40. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
brainwriting
options
key steps in integrative negotiation
individual collectivism
41. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
ways to generate options to a problem
brainwriting
endowment effect
legitimacy
42. What you really care about - wants needs etc
equal concession negotiaitor
an interest in negotiation
a position in negotiation
convergent thinking
43. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
active listening activities
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
relationship issues
argument dilution
44. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
contingency contracts
Particularism
flower child negotiator
tunnel vision
45. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
non-verbal attending
sequence planning
joint gain
sunk cost framing
46. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
circular logrolli
old fashioned negotiator
illusory correlation
horizon thinkng
47. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
functional fixedness
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
cognitive route
walk away alternative
48. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
functional fixedness
affective route
ZOPA
gamblers fallacy
49. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
commitment
joint gain
Particularism
irritators
50. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
knowledge based trust
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
illusion of transparecy
walk away alternative