SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
non-verbal attending
gamblers fallacy
distributive negotiations
inert knowledge problem
2. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
common identity groups
legitimacy
circular logrolli
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
3. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
problem solving model
active listening
endowment effect
non-verbal attending
4. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
active listening
Particularism
problem solving model
social striving
5. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
contingency contracts
tunnel vision
flower child negotiator
exploration of options
6. The strenght of positive relations within a team
active listening activities
an interest in negotiation
egalitarianism hierarchy
cohension
7. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
communication in negotiaion
errors that prevent agreement
old fashioned negotiator
seller status framing
8. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
endowment effect
logrolling
old fashioned negotiator
9. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
endowment effect
egalitarianism hierarchy
unbundling
10. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
relationship issues
an interest in negotiation
errors that prevent agreement
integrative negotiation
11. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
false conflict or illusory conflict
setting limits
relationship issues
sequence vs. issue planning
12. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
issue mix
reflections
enlightened negotiator
contingency contracts
13. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
joint gain
endowment effect
sequence vs. issue planning
verbal minimal encouragers
14. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
reflections
knowledge based trust
reservation price
impossibilty theorem
15. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
nonspecific compensation
impossibilty theorem
flower child negotiator
walk away alternative
16. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
inductive reasoning
enlightened negotiator
partnership model
impossibilty theorem
17. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
defend/attack spirals
base rates
enlightened negotiator
multiparty negotiations
18. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
inductive reasoning
reciprocity principle
old fashioned negotiator
aspect ratio framing
19. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
pivotal power
divergent thinking
impossibilty theorem
errors that prevent agreement
20. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
active listening activities
common bond groups
divergent thinking
legitimacy
21. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
individual collectivism
divergent thinking
knowledge based trust
ways to generate options to a problem
22. When a problem solver bases a strategy on familiar methods
circular logrolli
dispositional attribution
functional fixedness
deterrence based trust
23. Expand the amount of available resources
integrative negotiation
partnership model
deductive reasoning
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
24. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
pivotal power
key components in Negotiation
tunnel vision
ways to generate options to a problem
25. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
equal concession negotiaitor
multiphase negotiations
impossibilty theorem
26. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
key steps in integrative negotiation
affective route
verbal minimal encouragers
sunk cost framing
27. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
defend/attack spirals
ZOPA
brainwriting
inductive reasoning
28. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
base rates
premature consessions
options
multiparty negotiations
29. See invalid correlations between events
multiphase negotiations
illusory correlation
reservation price
walk away alternative
30. Members who are attracted to particular members
common bond groups
setting limits
social loafing
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
31. Means by which people influence others
an interest in negotiation
multiphase negotiations
contingency contracts
egalitarianism hierarchy
32. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
sequence planning
relationship issues
barrier to agreement
options
33. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
argument dilution
key steps in integrative negotiation
issue mix
circular logrolli
34. Listening actively and empathetically to whatever the other party says
endowment effect
sequence vs. issue planning
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
communication in negotiaion
35. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
nonspecific compensation
issue mix
relationship issues
affective route
36. Based on intuition and emotion
inductive reasoning
horizon thinkng
affective route
ways to generate options to a problem
37. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
sequence vs. issue planning
barrier to agreement
integrative negotiation
38. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
reflections
old fashioned negotiator
active listening
unbundling
39. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
legitimacy
social loafing
tunnel vision
egalitarianism hierarchy
40. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
identification based trust
errors that prevent agreement
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
inert knowledge problem
41. One that calls into question anothers character
illusory correlation
premature consessions
distributive negotiations
dispositional attribution
42. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
deductive reasoning
Particularism
equal concession negotiaitor
43. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
relevant polarity framing
endowment effect
problem solving model
key components in Negotiation
44. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
social loafing
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
tunnel vision
functional fixedness
45. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
inert knowledge problem
distributive negotiations
social loafing
46. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
divergent thinking
egalitarianism hierarchy
irritators
logrolling
47. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
options
an interest in negotiation
convergent thinking
aspect ratio framing
48. Group members independently write down ideas for resolvig negotiation then meet a share the ideas
brainwriting
active listening activities
dispositional attribution
argument dilution
49. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
BATNA
sequence planning
multiparty negotiations
ways to generate options to a problem
50. What you say you want - your solution
verbal minimal encouragers
a position in negotiation
logrolling
common bond groups