SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
ways to generate options to a problem
tunnel vision
individual collectivism
commitment
2. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
reservation price
common identity groups
cohension
nonspecific compensation
3. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
reflections
sequence planning
multiparty negotiations
sunk cost framing
4. Words and sounds - E.g. Really? - You're kidding! - Then what happened - Uh-huh
brainwriting
verbal minimal encouragers
distributive negotiations
illusion of transparecy
5. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
legitimacy
horizon thinkng
seller status framing
old fashioned negotiator
6. Out of the box thinking
gamblers fallacy
divergent thinking
inductive reasoning
affective route
7. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
inductive reasoning
key components in Negotiation
flower child negotiator
issue mix
8. Agreements wherein negotiators make bets based on their differences in beliefs forecasts risk profiles and interests
horizon thinkng
illusory correlation
contingency contracts
inductive reasoning
9. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
divergent thinking
gamblers fallacy
argument dilution
flower child negotiator
10. Division of large - all encompassing issues into smaller more manageable ones
errors that prevent agreement
impossibilty theorem
unbundling
inert knowledge problem
11. Expand the pie - Logroll-finding different issues and prioritize them. End up with a highly preferred outcome - Compensation(not integrative)- agreeing to ones objectives and accommodating the others interests - cut the costs for compliance-ones obje
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
convergent thinking
partnership model
gamblers fallacy
12. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
multiphase negotiations
gamblers fallacy
brainwriting
affective route
13. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
sequence planning
BATNA
Particularism
aspect ratio framing
14. Do not be disclosing - Learn interests - BATNA - etc. of other side - Establishing an anchor - Offering concessions grudgingly - Presenting deadlines to create urgency - Offering multiple proposals to provide option - Signal interest in closing the d
individual collectivism
distributive negotiations
inductive reasoning
premature consessions
15. One that calls into question anothers character
key steps in integrative negotiation
dispositional attribution
relevant polarity framing
integrative negotiation
16. Based on consistency of behvior
defend/attack spirals
deterrence based trust
equal concession negotiaitor
gamblers fallacy
17. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
identification based trust
multiparty negotiations
contingency contracts
reservation price
18. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
illusion of transparecy
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
brainwriting
ZOPA
19. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
verbal minimal encouragers
sunk cost framing
exploration of options
inert knowledge problem
20. Tendency for people in group negotiations to underestimate the number of feasible options
common bond groups
inductive reasoning
verbal minimal encouragers
tunnel vision
21. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
divergent thinking
identification based trust
cohension
common bond groups
22. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
active listening activities
divergent thinking
defend/attack spirals
logrolling
23. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
sunk cost framing
inductive reasoning
perseverance effect
endowment effect
24. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
issue mix
ways to generate options to a problem
affective route
premature consessions
25. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
multiparty negotiations
contingency contracts
an interest in negotiation
horizon thinkng
26. Skilled negotiators considered a wider range of outcomes or options than did average negotiators - they seem to demonstrate a willingness to consider counterparts' options
relevant polarity framing
ways to generate options to a problem
false conflict or illusory conflict
exploration of options
27. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
seller status framing
joint gain
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
key components in Negotiation
28. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
non-verbal attending
partnership model
logrolling
integrative negotiation
29. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
dispositional attribution
illusion of transparecy
integrative negotiation
walk away alternative
30. Believing something is true even after it has been proven not
nonspecific compensation
walk away alternative
communication in negotiaion
perseverance effect
31. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
endowment effect
knowledge based trust
equal concession negotiaitor
ZOPA
32. Your Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
BATNA
endowment effect
gamblers fallacy
base rates
33. Means by which people influence others
options
barrier to agreement
egalitarianism hierarchy
convergent thinking
34. Clients are treated like partners
convergent thinking
communication in negotiaion
social striving
partnership model
35. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
ways to generate options to a problem
perseverance effect
sequence planning
false conflict or illusory conflict
36. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
logrolling
reflections
flower child negotiator
irritators
37. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
illusory correlation
tunnel vision
irritators
individual collectivism
38. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
cognitive route
communication in negotiaion
inert knowledge problem
argument dilution
39. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
partnership model
enlightened negotiator
endowment effect
cognitive route
40. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
defend/attack spirals
pivotal power
exploration of options
perseverance effect
41. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
relevant polarity framing
Particularism
a position in negotiation
an interest in negotiation
42. Expand the amount of available resources
verbal minimal encouragers
sequence planning
integrative negotiation
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
43. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
inductive reasoning
irritators
endowment effect
seller status framing
44. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
irritators
non-verbal attending
GRIP goals
commitment
45. Based on intuition and emotion
affective route
gamblers fallacy
joint gain
premature consessions
46. The tendency to treat chance events as though they have a built in evening out mechanism
gamblers fallacy
dispositional attribution
knowledge based trust
base rates
47. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
functional fixedness
reflections
individual collectivism
ZOPA
48. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
key components in Negotiation
relationship issues
common bond groups
partnership model
49. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
social loafing
deterrence based trust
impossibilty theorem
cognitive route
50. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
walk away alternative
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
ZOPA
setting limits