SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Someone who is too concerned with win-win negotiations they forget to claim resources
GRIP goals
commitment
flower child negotiator
circular logrolli
2. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
communication in negotiaion
impossibilty theorem
sequence vs. issue planning
joint gain
3. Prepare self with positive - engaged attitude exp Pike Place Fish market in Seattle - It doesn't matter where you work - you get to choose your attitude ( Nodding your head - removing physical barriers)
non-verbal attending
old fashioned negotiator
issue mix
inert knowledge problem
4. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
deterrence based trust
options
deductive reasoning
5. The derivation of group preference from individual preference is indeterminate
impossibilty theorem
inert knowledge problem
nonspecific compensation
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
6. Brainstorming - electronic brainstorming - surveys
brainwriting
ways to generate options to a problem
common bond groups
sequence planning
7. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
communication in negotiaion
cohension
ZOPA
8. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
brainwriting
social loafing
common bond groups
inductive reasoning
9. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
active listening
distributive negotiations
individual collectivism
GRIP goals
10. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
impossibilty theorem
walk away alternative
seller status framing
false conflict or illusory conflict
11. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
joint gain
seller status framing
non-verbal attending
false conflict or illusory conflict
12. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
social striving
setting limits
brainwriting
inductive reasoning
13. 'Maximize profit' approaches enjoyed greater profitability than did ' Minimize Expenses' approaches( the maximize profit group completed more transactions for greater profit but the 'minimize expenses' framers completed transactions of greater mean p
inert knowledge problem
key components in Negotiation
relevant polarity framing
tunnel vision
14. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
a position in negotiation
illusion of transparecy
errors that prevent agreement
nonspecific compensation
15. Splitting the difference or compromising which is ofern mistaken for win-win negotiaitions
equal concession negotiaitor
verbal minimal encouragers
relevant polarity framing
active listening activities
16. Based on intuition and emotion
social striving
sequence planning
multiphase negotiations
affective route
17. Based on consistency of behvior
irritators
logrolling
deterrence based trust
distributive negotiations
18. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
functional fixedness
circular logrolli
contingency contracts
pivotal power
19. Irrational excalation - Partisian Perceptions - Unreasonable expectations - Overconfidence - Unchecked emotions
partnership model
errors that prevent agreement
seller status framing
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
20. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
individual collectivism
inert knowledge problem
walk away alternative
illusion of transparecy
21. One that calls into question anothers character
dispositional attribution
irritators
ZOPA
deterrence based trust
22. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
verbal minimal encouragers
equal concession negotiaitor
BATNA
barrier to agreement
23. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
ways to generate options to a problem
nonspecific compensation
sequence planning
cognitive route
24. Proceed towards one answer
a position in negotiation
convergent thinking
legitimacy
commitment
25. Mental model of negotiation in which people consider negotiation to be the task of definin and solving a problem
integrative negotiation
social striving
relationship issues
problem solving model
26. Sellers of a product/service will place a higher value on the product/service than will the buyer or third party.
unbundling
dispositional attribution
endowment effect
GRIP goals
27. The strategy of trading off in a negotiaion so as to capitalize on differet strengths of preference
logrolling
barrier to agreement
sunk cost framing
identification based trust
28. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
false conflict or illusory conflict
deterrence based trust
inductive reasoning
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
29. What you say you want - your solution
divergent thinking
aspect ratio framing
a position in negotiation
inductive reasoning
30. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
premature consessions
argument dilution
ways to generate options to a problem
31. Working harder in a group
walk away alternative
social striving
deductive reasoning
integrative negotiation
32. Skilled negotiators used fewer reasons to back up each of his/her arguments only moving to subsidiary reasons only if main reason began to wither.
circular logrolli
argument dilution
flower child negotiator
inert knowledge problem
33. Clients are treated like partners
communication in negotiaion
endowment effect
partnership model
multiphase negotiations
34. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
barrier to agreement
cohension
legitimacy
multiphase negotiations
35. Being overly affected by form of a presentation of information in negotiation (pay attention to both content and context. even though framing is important - be more aware of the content!)
inert knowledge problem
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
key components in Negotiation
multiphase negotiations
36. Focus on commonalities - Address need and interests - Commit to meet all parties needs - exchange info and ideas - invent options for mutual gain - use objective criteria to set standards
unbundling
argument dilution
integrative negotiation
functional fixedness
37. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
egalitarianism hierarchy
distributive negotiations
key components in Negotiation
commitment
38. How much utility we derive depends on who is providing it
an interest in negotiation
Particularism
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
tunnel vision
39. Out of the box thinking
divergent thinking
distributive negotiations
reservation price
setting limits
40. Grounded bahvioral predicatability and it occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior
seller status framing
reservation price
argument dilution
knowledge based trust
41. Skilled negotiators - if they decided to attack - gave no warning and attacked severely
unbundling
reflections
defend/attack spirals
aspect ratio framing
42. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
joint gain
horizon thinkng
reflections
43. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
issue mix
communication in negotiaion
cognitive route
aspect ratio framing
44. Average Negotiators more reliant on sequence planning - Skilled Negotiators more likely to use issue planning (more flexible plan)
errors that prevent agreement
gamblers fallacy
sequence vs. issue planning
tunnel vision
45. Members who are attracted to particular members
a position in negotiation
issue mix
common bond groups
legitimacy
46. The process of drawing logical conclusions
circular logrolli
old fashioned negotiator
equal concession negotiaitor
deductive reasoning
47. We feel obligated to return in kind what others have offered or given us
reciprocity principle
deductive reasoning
inductive reasoning
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
48. Define problem which will be acceptable to both sides - state problem with an eye toward practicality and comprehensiveness - state problem and id the obstacles in obtaining it - don't make the problem personal - separate the problem definition from
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
most common cognitive mistakes in Negotiation
premature consessions
multiparty negotiations
49. Unable to acces knowledge when we need it
impossibilty theorem
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
false conflict or illusory conflict
inert knowledge problem
50. The worst agreement you're willing to accept ('walk-away')
irritators
relationship issues
walk away alternative
reservation price