SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Negotiation
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Someone who realizes both that the pie can be expanded and who does not forget to claim resources
integrative negotiation
enlightened negotiator
relationship issues
walk away alternative
2. The union of both parties issue sets
issue mix
false conflict or illusory conflict
reciprocity principle
old fashioned negotiator
3. Identify and define the problem - Understand the problem fully - identify interests and needs on both sides - Generate alternative solutions - Evaluate and select among alternative
old fashioned negotiator
impossibilty theorem
key steps in integrative negotiation
multiphase negotiations
4. Prepare to listen - Non-verbal attending - Verbally interact with and Encourage the speaker(helps ensure understanding)
pivotal power
active listening activities
reciprocity principle
issue mix
5. Out of the box thinking
walk away alternative
circular logrolli
deterrence based trust
divergent thinking
6. A situation in which conflict does not exist between people yet they erroneously perceive the presence of conflict
false conflict or illusory conflict
defend/attack spirals
dispositional attribution
relevant polarity framing
7. External standards or precedents that might convince one or both parties that a proposed agreement is fair
illusion of transparecy
key components in Negotiation
legitimacy
common identity groups
8. Working harder in a group
social striving
barrier to agreement
relevant polarity framing
relationship issues
9. What you really care about - wants needs etc
an interest in negotiation
knowledge based trust
contingency contracts
seller status framing
10. One negotiator receives what he or she wants and the other is compensated by some method that was initially out of reach
seller status framing
nonspecific compensation
sunk cost framing
non-verbal attending
11. Coalitions can form among parties - Natural Coalitions:allies share a broad range of common interests - there are likely to be frequent allies - single-issue coalitions:Parties difffer on other issues unite on singe issue - might be Strange Bedfellow
partnership model
deterrence based trust
multiparty negotiations
functional fixedness
12. Take time to 'cool off' - Explore different ways to logroll - Exploit differences in expectations and risk/ time preferences - Keep decisions tentative and conditional until a final proposal is complete - Minimize formality - record keeping until fi
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
social loafing
logrolling
deterrence based trust
13. Based on rational and deliberate thoughts
distributive negotiations
unbundling
cognitive route
argument dilution
14. Means by which people influence others
argument dilution
joint gain
egalitarianism hierarchy
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
15. Members who are attracted to particular members
egalitarianism hierarchy
common bond groups
options
equal concession negotiaitor
16. Clarify the meaning of communications and check perceptions with the speaker exp. paraphrase in own words
reflections
perseverance effect
illusion of transparecy
identification based trust
17. Also known as Reflective Listening - as we can reflect on what was said - how it was said - and the nonverbal cues
defend/attack spirals
Particularism
key steps in integrative negotiation
active listening
18. What can i do if i walk away without agreement? which is best
walk away alternative
sequence planning
some options by redefining the problems (alternative solutions)
exploration of options
19. Someone who believs one must adopt a tough hard stance to negotiate
defend/attack spirals
cohension
dispositional attribution
old fashioned negotiator
20. If we reach agreement - we commit to some option
commitment
issue mix
joint gain
common identity groups
21. Members who are attracted to the group
defend/attack spirals
common identity groups
social loafing
reciprocity principle
22. The strenght of positive relations within a team
cohension
divergent thinking
social striving
commitment
23. Expand the amount of available resources
integrative negotiation
ways to generate options to a problem
social loafing
active listening
24. Grounded in complete empathy with another persons desires and intentions
contingency contracts
identification based trust
issue mix
barrier to agreement
25. Making concessions on issues before they are even requested
horizon thinkng
premature consessions
problem solving model
relevant polarity framing
26. Form of hypothesis testing - or trial and error
inductive reasoning
verbal minimal encouragers
premature consessions
legitimacy
27. The process of drawing logical conclusions
premature consessions
ZOPA
social loafing
deductive reasoning
28. Goals and interests related to: Gain - relationship - identity - process
divergent thinking
seller status framing
key components in Negotiation
GRIP goals
29. reliability - mutual acceptance - emotions
relationship issues
illusion of transparecy
sequence vs. issue planning
circular logrolli
30. What you say you want - your solution
old fashioned negotiator
a position in negotiation
multiparty negotiations
aspect ratio framing
31. Involves trade iffs that require each group member to offer another member a concession on one issue while receiving a concession from yet another group member on a different issue
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
false conflict or illusory conflict
circular logrolli
endowment effect
32. Proceed towards one answer
commitment
egalitarianism hierarchy
convergent thinking
common bond groups
33. Basic human motive concerning preservation of the self versus collective
inductive reasoning
circular logrolli
commitment
individual collectivism
34. Based on consistency of behvior
convergent thinking
circular logrolli
deterrence based trust
distributive negotiations
35. Possible agreements or part of agreemenrrs that you might reach with your negotiation party
impossibilty theorem
barrier to agreement
options
inductive reasoning
36. Often - a consumer is willing to pay more for the identical product or service sold at a swank specialty shop than at discount store. There is a tendency to assign a greater value to the quality of the transaction over the actual intrinsic worth of a
seller status framing
reciprocity principle
verbal minimal encouragers
relevant polarity framing
37. Skilled negotiators tended to avoid saying gratuitous things about themselves - avoided self descriptions of 'fair' or 'reasonable' and comments such as generous offer
illusion of transparecy
aspect ratio framing
irritators
identification based trust
38. The total of the gains earned by each party in the negotiation
knowledge based trust
joint gain
distributive negotiations
individual collectivism
39. Dies-hard bargainers - Lack of trust - Sabotage from weak commitments - Differences in gender and culture - Difficulties in communication
social striving
barrier to agreement
BATNA
things to look for when identifying and define the problem
40. BATNA - Reservation Price - ZOPA - Value Creation through Trades
integrative negotiation
old fashioned negotiator
reflections
key components in Negotiation
41. The ability to change a losing coalition into winning coalition
pivotal power
commitment
an interest in negotiation
key components in Negotiation
42. Implemented over time in different phases - each phase has own promises and dealings - early phases: become familiar with other's Negotiation Style - Build Trust - Monitor Other party to ensure follow through - Walk away from Disconcerting negotiati
GRIP goals
multiphase negotiations
knowledge based trust
logrolling
43. People tend to base behavior on readily understood terms such as percentages. Exp All other things being equal ( quality of product - the store - service - etc)more people are willing to suffer the same inconveniences to save $30 on a $70 item than t
ZOPA
aspect ratio framing
unbundling
distributive negotiations
44. Zone Of Possible Aggreements defined by range between parties' reservation prices
dispositional attribution
pivotal power
ZOPA
premature consessions
45. Skilled negotiators were significantly more likely to set upper and lower limits - planning was done in terms of ranges - more flexible than average negotiators
enlightened negotiator
joint gain
setting limits
some guild lines in evaluating options and reaching a consensus
46. Putting a number of events - or potential occurrences into a time sequence exp. 'First I'll bring up A - then lead to B - and after that ill cover C etc.
sequence planning
aspect ratio framing
relationship issues
reservation price
47. Negotiators thinking they are revealing more information that they actually are
barrier to agreement
illusion of transparecy
pivotal power
identification based trust
48. The most common cause of transactional entrapment - E.g. Dollar auction- auctioneer accepts bid for a one dollar bill. second highest bidder must also pay the bid. Biggest problem is the reluctance to cut losses once the commitment is made.
sunk cost framing
inert knowledge problem
active listening activities
logrolling
49. One that calls into question anothers character
deterrence based trust
egalitarianism hierarchy
dispositional attribution
sequence planning
50. Negotiator unilaterally deduces what the counterpartys true interests are - and where the joint gains are by listening to their responses in negotiation
inductive reasoning
deterrence based trust
active listening
logrolling