SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 'The moral to a story tells us a greater truth' is a warrant for what arg?
Narrative
Parallelism
Manufactroversy
Litotes
2. The inference reasons that what a trustworthy source says is true. The warrant to this argument usually says - 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true'
Checking for Example argument
Parallelism
(Argument from) Testimony
(Argument by) Example
3. _____ rejected rhetoric as flattery - not truth - a 'knack' on par with 'cookery' and 'cosmetics'
Arguments
Plato
Sign
Tu Quoque
4. Is the metaphor overused - heard so many times that it becomes tedious rather than persuasive?
Metaphor
Special Topoi
(Argument by) Analogy
Cliche
5. Reasoning from case to case
(Argument from) Cause
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Epistrophe
Analogy
6. Using a term in an argument in one sense in one place and another sense in another place
Epistrophe
Equivocation
Incrementum
Appeal to Authority
7. Term with higher (positive) value
Tu Quoque
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
Corax
Mercenary Scientists
8. Most fallacies are ____ ____; that is if the argument were to employ difference evidence - or be offered in different circumstances - it would be perfectly fine - but in the specific case in which it is identified as a fallacy - it is flawed
Syllogism
Situationally flawed
Status
Cure
9. Accepting a token gesture for something more substantive
Ad Populum
Tokenism
Composition
Division
10. 'What is true in this case is true in general' or 'What is true in general is true in this case' Is a warrant for what kind of argument?
Commonplaces
Intelligence
Example
Tu Quoque
11. Indicating that something (the claim) is or is not. Is an argument from _____ ? (not a stasis point)
Sign
Syllogism
Prolepsis
Euphimism
12. All A are B -no B are C - therefore - no A are C
Appeal to Authority
Categorical (Syllogism)
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Checking for Example argument
13. If A then B Not B Therefore not A
Modus Tollens
Fallacies
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
Epanalepsis
14. Good Moral Character
Euphimism
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
Archetypal (Metaphor)
15. Values what is at the core or essence of a group (or class) rather than what is at the margins
Disassociation of Concepts
Isocrates
Locus of Essence
Questionable Cause
16. The inference moves from specific to general or from general to specific. The warrant to this argument usually reads 'what is true in this case is true in general' or 'what is true in general is true in this case'
Formal Debate
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Grounds (or data)
(Argument by) Example
17. Honesty - Dedication - Courage (What part of Ethos)
False Charge of Fallacy
Good Moral Character
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Burden of Rejoinder
18. A metaphor that gives attributes to a nonhuman thing
(Argument from) Cause
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Personification
19. The inference moves from cause to effect or effect to cause - arguing that something is the direct result of something else. The warrant to this argument is usually formatted as: 'X is a form of Y'
(Argument from) Cause
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Value Hierarchies
Status
20. Deliberate correction
Informal Debate
Correctio
Good Will (Ethos)
False Dichotomy
21. The belief that current thinking - attitudes - values - and actions will continue in the absence of good arguments for their change
Presumption
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Attitudinal (inherency)
Division
22. Involves a large number of people; from Ill stock issue - Produces a large amount of harm; from Ill stock issue
Mercenary Scientists
Presumption
Quantitative (significance)
Aristotle
23. Does the moral really follow from the story? Is the narrative plausible and coherent? Are the characterizations consistent?
Parallelism
Sign
Checking for Narrative argument
Appeal to Authority
24. Knowledge - Experience - Prudence (What part of Ethos)
Questionable Cause
Sophist
Isocrates
Intelligence
25. A manufactured controversy that is motivated by profit or extreme ideology to intentionally create confusion in the public about an issue of scientific fact that is not in dispute by the scientific community. Used to stop debate at the conjectural le
Manufactroversy
Term I/Term II
Anadiplosis
Appeal to Authority
26. Demonstrating respect and care for the audience
Second (or) Third
Value-Oriented Arguments
Sound
Good Will (Ethos)
27. These seats or commonplaces of argument suggest inferences that arguers might make that are based on the habits of thought and value hierarchies that everyone shares
Loci of the Preferable
Valid
Litotes
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
28. Providing a response to each reason that an opponent gives
Red Herring
Direct Refutation
Blame
Analogy
29. Shifting the buren of proof is a category of ____ __ _____
Good Will (Ethos)
Small Sample
Checking for Example argument
Appeal to Ignorance
30. Draws a conclusions about ONE MEMBER of a GROUP based on a general rule about all members
Accident
Ad Hominem
Ambiguity
Begging the Question
31. An irrelevant attack on an opponent rather than on the opponent's evidence or arguments; this is literally translated as an argument 'to the person'
Ad Hominem
Non Sequitur
Composition
Correctio
32. Deliberate exaggeration for effect; it is often accomplished via comparisons - similes - and metaphors.
Composition
Hyperbole
Anadiplosis
Categorical (Syllogism)
33. Originality - explanatory power - quantitative precision - simplicity - scope
Second (or) Third
(Special Topoi for) Science
Checking for Cause argement
Correctio
34. Focuses on inadequacies or problems in the status quo - must be significant if a change is to be made. Must Have: 1. Quantitative significance: affects lots of people 2. Qualitative significance: is of bad quality
Incrementum
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Ill
Appeal to Authority
35. The list that builds
First
Incrementum
Argument
Turn
36. Using information from mercenary scientists is committing what fallacy?
Antithesis
Appeal to Authority
Locus of Quality
Refutation
37. An implicit comparison made by referring to one thing as another
Unsound
Enthymeme
Metaphor
Status
38. Repetition of the endings of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
(Argument by) Analogy
Epistrophe
Protagoras
Appeal to Authority
39. Circular Reasoning
Begging the Question
Exergasia
Mixed Metaphor
Epanalepsis
40. Faling to bring relevant evidence to bear on an argument
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Burden of proof
Cure
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
41. 'If two things are alike in most respects - they will be alike in this respect too' Warrant for what arg?
Exergasia
Analogy
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Antithesis
42. A legitimate generalization is applied to a particular case in an absolute manner
Locus of Existence
(Fallacy of) Accident
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Antithesis
43. Drawing an analogical conclusion when the cases compared are not relevantly alike
Stasis
Begging the Question
Tisias
Questionable Analogy
44. Incorrectly assuming that what is true of the parts is true of the whole
Refutation Strategies
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Composition
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
45. All A are B - all C are B - therefore no A are C
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Ill
False Charge of Fallacy
Anadiplosis
46. Beginning repeated
Anaphora
Enthymeme
Disassociation of Concepts
Unequivocal
47. 'Bad eggs are all you are likely to get from a bad crow' was said where?
Testimony
Anadiplosis
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
Burden of Rejoinder
48. Juxtaposition of contrasting words or ideas
Appeal to Ignorance
Questionable Analogy
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Antithesis
49. Values what is concrete rather than what is merely possible
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Checking for Narrative argument
Locus of Existence
Hyperbole
50. Literally - 'wise one' ; taught rhetoric to citizenry
Sophist
Formal Logic
Appeal to Ignorance
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc