SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Prolepsis - Direct Refutation - Conceding some points to focus on others - Agree on commonality then refute - and Turn are all examples of _____ ______
Locus of Existence
Refutation Strategies
Presumption
Grounds (or data)
2. A field of scholarship devoted to how arguments work
Litotes
Claim
Rhetoric
Second (or) Third
3. The inference compares two similar things - saying that since they are alike in some respects - they are alike in another respect. It can be a figurative analogy or a literal analogy. The warrant usually reads: 'if two things are alike in most respec
Anadiplosis
Locus of Quantity
Decorum
(Argument by) Analogy
4. What order does conjectural stasis usually fall in when arguing?
Non Sequitur
Epistrophe
Erotema
First
5. Is the source qualified to say what is being said? Is she or he in a position to know this information? Does the testimony represent what the authority really meant to say? Is the source relatively unbiased and recent?
Unsound
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Checking for Testimony argument
Simile
6. Usually has three parts: 1. (MP) Major Premise - unequivocal statement 2. (mP) Minor Premise - about a specific case 3. (C) Conclusion - follows necessarily from the premises
Syllogism
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Stasis
Questionable Cause
7. Ideas repeated
Division
Hasty Generalization
Argument
Exergasia
8. A manufactured controversy that is motivated by profit or extreme ideology to intentionally create confusion in the public about an issue of scientific fact that is not in dispute by the scientific community. Used to stop debate at the conjectural le
Mercenary Scientists
Manufactroversy
Checking for Cause argement
Categorical (Syllogism)
9. Focuses on inadequacies or problems in the status quo - must be significant if a change is to be made. Must Have: 1. Quantitative significance: affects lots of people 2. Qualitative significance: is of bad quality
Cliche
Charisma
Cure
Ill
10. _____ thought that rhetoric is the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion
Refutation Strategies
Aristotle
(Argument from) Testimony
Locus of Essence
11. Whitewashes the effect of your topic to downplay it; less emotional than appropriate
Hasty Generalization
Euphimism
False Charge of Fallacy
Hasty Generalization
12. After this - therefore on account of this
Rhetoric
Unequivocal
Value Hierarchies
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
13. Demonstrating respect and care for the audience
Blame
Appeal to Ignorance
Good Will (Ethos)
Locus of Quantity
14. Incorrectly assuming that what is true of the parts is true of the whole
Composition
Syllogism
Qualitative (Stasis)
Begging the Question
15. Erroneously accusing others of fallacious reasoning
Ad Hominem
Checking for Narrative argument
Narrative
False Charge of Fallacy
16. Providing a response to each reason that an opponent gives
Direct Refutation
Metaphor
Attitudinal (inherency)
Epanalepsis
17. What is 'at issue' in a controversy; the place where two sides of an argument come into conflict; the clash between arguments.
Litotes
Parallelism
Stasis
Analogy
18. Assuming as a premise some form of the very point that is at issue - the very conclusion we intend to prove. Also called circular reasoning.
Anaphora
Begging the Question
(Special Topoi for) Republicans
(Special Topoi for) Science
19. Circular Reasoning
Begging the Question
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Charisma
Questionable Analogy
20. Juxtaposition of contrasting words or ideas
Antithesis
Cure
Erotema
Epanalepsis
21. Is a variation of Appeal to Ignorance. It is when you accept an argument that the presumption lies with one side and the other side has the burden of proving its case when the reverse is actually true
Litotes
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Locus of Existence
Burden of proof
22. The opposite of hyperbole - this is a deliberate understatement for effect.
Litotes
Parallelism
Tools of Refutation
Hasty Generalization
23. Letters to the editor - group discussions - talk show
Burden of Rejoinder
Appeal to Ignorance
Informal Debate
Checking for Example argument
24. Values more over less in terms of quantitative outcomes (the greatest good for the greatest number)
Syllogism
Locus of Quantity
(Fallacy of) Accident
Agree on Commonality then refute
25. Set two things in opposition
Questionable Analogy
Appeal to Ignorance
Rhetoric
Antithesis
26. _______ in ancient Greece spurred the need for the use of rhetoric in everyday life.
Checking for Sign argument
Questionable Analogy
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Popular Democracy
27. Agree with the values or goals of the opposition - but then argue that the opposition doesn't do a better job of achieving those values goals
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Agree on Commonality then refute
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Appeal to Ignorance
28. Incorrectly assuming that one choice or another must be made when other choices are available or when no choice must be made
Common Practice (Fallacy)
False Dichotomy
Refutation Strategies
Cost
29. Repetition of the same word or groups of words at the beginning of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
Narrative
Conceding Arguments
Associated Commonplaces
Anaphora
30. Is a variation of the tu quoque; it is when you justify a wrong by saying that most other people do it too.
Common Practice (Fallacy)
Composition
Rhetoric
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
31. Opposite of Hyperbole
Epistrophe
Hyperbole
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Litotes
32. Term with lower (negative) value
Checking for Analogy argument
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Syllogism
Blame
33. All A are B - all C are B - therefore no A are C
Decorum
Metaphor
Consistency
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
34. Is a variation of the non sequiter; it is when the irrelevant reason is meant to divert the attention of the audience from the real issue
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Red Herring
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Anadiplosis
35. Asks - 'of what kind is it?' Involves a question of the quality of the act - whether it is good or bad.
Parallelism
Disassociation of Concepts
Qualitative (Stasis)
Valid
36. What order do definitional and qualitative stasis usually fall into when put into an argument?
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
False Dichotomy
Second
Ad Populum
37. Ending of one repeated at the beginning of another
Hyperbole
Anadiplosis
Anaphora
Rhetoric
38. The inference moves from cause to effect or effect to cause - arguing that something is the direct result of something else. The warrant to this argument is usually formatted as: 'X is a form of Y'
Stasis
(Argument from) Cause
Hyperbole
Conceding Arguments
39. The inference moves from specific to general or from general to specific. The warrant to this argument usually reads 'what is true in this case is true in general' or 'what is true in general is true in this case'
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
(Argument by) Example
Mercenary Scientists
Status
40. An argument that follows proper logical form
Testimony
Begging the Question
Sign
Valid
41. Fallacious argument from specific to general without sufficient evidence - Draws a conclusion about all the members of a group based on the knowledge of some members
Hasty Generalization
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Isocrates
Ad Populum
42. Does the argument effectively appeal to audience values and priorities? Does the argument accurately capture the values at play in this situation?
Antithesis
Tu Quoque
Categorical (Syllogism)
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
43. Civil rights - economic justice - environmental stewardship - government as safety net - worker's rights - diversity
(Argument from) Narrative
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Questionable Cause
Unequivocal
44. Incorrectly assuming that what is true of the whole is true of the parts
Parallelism
Good Will (Ethos)
Division
Epistrophe
45. Opposite of Anaphora
Epistrophe
Anadiplosis
Locus of Existence
(Argument by) Example
46. Puritan morality - change and progress - equality of opportunity - rejection of authority - achievement and success
Equivocation
Modus Ponens
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
Presumption
47. Bases inferences on what we know of how people act in a rational/predictable way - in order to determine the truth
(Argument from) Cause
Anadiplosis
(Argument of ) General probability
Situationally flawed
48. An argument with true premises and valid form
Locus of Essence
(Argument from) Testimony
(Fallacy of) Accident
Sound
49. A metaphor with a vehicle that draws upon experience that is specific to a particular culture
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Cliche
Value Hierarchies
(Fallacy of) Accident
50. If A then B Not B Therefore not A
Non Sequitur
Categorical (Syllogism)
Straw Person
Modus Tollens