SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A syllogism suppressing the Major Premise - and only contains a Minor Premise and the Conclusion. People speak in these more often than syllogisms.
Enthymeme
Antithesis
Epanalepsis
Ad Hominem
2. Values what is unique - irreplaceable or original
Antithesis
Locus of Quality
Appeal to Ignorance
Stock Issues
3. The belief that current thinking - attitudes - values - and actions will continue in the absence of good arguments for their change
Stock Issues
Direct Refutation
Presumption
Protagoras
4. Repetition of the endings of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Correctio
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Epistrophe
5. Is a variety of Hasty Generalization; it is when you draw conclusions about a population on the basis of a sample that is too small to be a reliable measure of that population
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Small Sample
Manufactroversy
Shifting the Burden of Proof
6. The inference moves from specific to general or from general to specific. The warrant to this argument usually reads 'what is true in this case is true in general' or 'what is true in general is true in this case'
Second
(Argument by) Example
Fallacies
Syllogism
7. Providing a response to each reason that an opponent gives
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Presumption
Locus of Existence
Direct Refutation
8. Draws a conclusions about ONE MEMBER of a GROUP based on a general rule about all members
Accident
Checking for Cause argement
Antithesis
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
9. Value Hierarchy Visualization
Formal Logic
Term I/Term II
Ad Hominem
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
10. Ideas repeated
Exergasia
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Burden of Rejoinder
Small Sample
11. Does the moral really follow from the story? Is the narrative plausible and coherent? Are the characterizations consistent?
Grounds (or data)
Antithesis
Checking for Narrative argument
False Dichotomy
12. Most fallacies are ____ ____; that is if the argument were to employ difference evidence - or be offered in different circumstances - it would be perfectly fine - but in the specific case in which it is identified as a fallacy - it is flawed
Begging the Question
Blame
Situationally flawed
Equivocation
13. The list that builds
Incrementum
Refutation Potential
Warrant
Blame
14. Ending repeated
Sign
Sound
Division
Epistrophe
15. Part of the blame stock issue - the acceptance or obedience to the policy or law makes it ineffective
Blame
Attitudinal (inherency)
Disassociation of Concepts
Questionable Cause
16. These seats or commonplaces of argument suggest inferences that arguers might make that are based on the habits of thought and value hierarchies that everyone shares
Questionable Analogy
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Loci of the Preferable
Parallelism
17. Faling to bring relevant evidence to bear on an argument
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Tokenism
Anadiplosis
18. Exaggeration
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Second
Rhetoric
Hyperbole
19. Incorrectly assuming that what is true of the parts is true of the whole
Epistrophe
Straw Person
Composition
Begging the Question
20. Use of a word or phrase that could have several meanings
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
Anadiplosis
Red Herring
Ambiguity
21. What vehicles and tenors share
False Charge of Fallacy
Refutation Potential
Epanalepsis
Associated Commonplaces
22. Originality - explanatory power - quantitative precision - simplicity - scope
Parallelism
(Argument by) Example
Toulmin Model
(Special Topoi for) Science
23. Is a variety of questionable cause; it is when you conclude that something cause dsomething else just because the second thing came after it; literally translated as 'after this - therefore on account of this'
Enthymeme
Plato
Decorum
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
24. An irrelevant attack on an opponent rather than on the opponent's evidence or arguments; this is literally translated as an argument 'to the person'
Correctio
Toulmin Model
Gorgias
Ad Hominem
25. If A then B Not B Therefore not A
Hyperbole
Small Sample
Modus Tollens
Composition
26. Good Moral Character
Refutation Potential
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Exergasia
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
27. An argument that either lacks validity - soundness or both.
Decision Rules
Checking for Example argument
Unsound
Checking for Sign argument
28. Honesty - Dedication - Courage (What part of Ethos)
Locus of Quantity
Anaphora
Rhetoric
Good Moral Character
29. Part of blame stock issue - the composition of the policy is flawed
Hyperbole
Structural (inherency)
Locus of Quantity
Composition
30. Are there associated commonplaces for this metaphor that can be turned against the arguer?
Parallelism
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Refutation Potential
Correctio
31. Repetition of the same word or groups of words at the beginning of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
Protagoras
Anaphora
Locus of Quantity
Antithesis
32. They stablish an arena for argumentation by defining ground for a dispute and issues of controversy. Typically - one side affirms the resolution and one side negates the resolution.
Aristotle
Debate Resolutions
Sophist
Rhetoric
33. Focuses on inadequacies or problems in the status quo - must be significant if a change is to be made. Must Have: 1. Quantitative significance: affects lots of people 2. Qualitative significance: is of bad quality
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Presumption
Division
Ill
34. A or B Not A Therefore - B
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
Valid
Stasis
Consistency
35. Juxtaposition of contrasting words or ideas
Antithesis
Presumption
Stock Issues
Situationally flawed
36. Is the metaphor appropriate? The key to ____ is matching strategy to situation.
Corax
Decorum
Anadiplosis
Arguments
37. Knowledge - Experience - Prudence (What part of Ethos)
Unsound
Epistrophe
Intelligence
Popular Democracy
38. What is 'at issue' in a controversy; the place where two sides of an argument come into conflict; the clash between arguments.
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Stasis
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
Correctio
39. Is the metaphor overused - heard so many times that it becomes tedious rather than persuasive?
(Fallacy of) Accident
Cliche
Example
Personification
40. Demonstrating respect and care for the audience
Situationally flawed
Good Will (Ethos)
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Decision Rules
41. Is a variation of Appeal to Ignorance. It is when you accept an argument that the presumption lies with one side and the other side has the burden of proving its case when the reverse is actually true
(Argument from) Testimony
Checking for Sign argument
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Agree on Commonality then refute
42. The proposition or conclusion that the arguer is advancing
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Valid
Claim
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
43. Is a variation of the non sequiter; it is when the irrelevant reason is meant to divert the attention of the audience from the real issue
Red Herring
Non Sequitur
Grounds (or data)
Tools of Refutation
44. Taking one idea and dividing it into two parts - disengaging the two resulting ideas - giving a positive value to one (Term II) and a lesser or negative value to the other (Term I). These are often based on the appearance/reality pair.
Rhetoric
Disassociation of Concepts
Corax
Analogy
45. Are the terms of the metaphor coherent - or does it tell a story or paint a picure that fails to make sense internally?
Simile
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Consistency
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
46. Letters to the editor - group discussions - talk show
Informal Debate
Checking for Testimony argument
Status
Parallelism
47. Agreeing to some of the arguments made by your opponents so that you can focus on others
False Dichotomy
Anaphora
Conceding Arguments
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
48. Puritan morality - change and progress - equality of opportunity - rejection of authority - achievement and success
Refutation Strategies
Consistency
Unrepresentative Sample
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
49. Is another variety of Hasty Generalization. It is when you reason from a sample that is not representative (typical) of the population from which it was drawn.
Fallacies
Unrepresentative Sample
Mercenary Scientists
Epanalepsis
50. Inference that allows you to move from grounds to claim (often implied in the argument)
Epistrophe
(Argument from) Sign
Definitional (Stasis)
Warrant