SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Good Moral Character
Aristotle
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Epanalepsis
Questionable Analogy
2. Is the source qualified to say what is being said? Is she or he in a position to know this information? Does the testimony represent what the authority really meant to say? Is the source relatively unbiased and recent?
Checking for Testimony argument
Stasis
Red Herring
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
3. Juxtaposition of contrasting words or ideas
Antithesis
Litotes
Fallacy Fallacy
Conjectural (Stasis)
4. The inference moves from specific to general or from general to specific. The warrant to this argument usually reads 'what is true in this case is true in general' or 'what is true in general is true in this case'
Correctio
Conjectural (Stasis)
Fallacy Fallacy
(Argument by) Example
5. What places do procedural stasis usually occupy in an argument?
Second (or) Third
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Deductive Reasoning
Categorical (Syllogism)
6. Ending repeated
Epanalepsis
Charisma
Epistrophe
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
7. Leaving no doubt - unambiguous
Sophist
Epistrophe
Unequivocal
Syllogism
8. Are there associated commonplaces for this metaphor that can be turned against the arguer?
Refutation Potential
Correctio
Prolepsis
Modus Tollens
9. Misrepresenting an opponent's position as more extreme than it really is and then attacking that version - or attacking a weaker opponent while ignoring a stronger one.
Correctio
Toulmin Model
Straw Person
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
10. What vehicles and tenors share
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Agree on Commonality then refute
Associated Commonplaces
Vehicle (and) Tenor
11. Civil rights - economic justice - environmental stewardship - government as safety net - worker's rights - diversity
Begging the Question
Blame
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Anaphora
12. The inference moves from cause to effect or effect to cause - arguing that something is the direct result of something else. The warrant to this argument is usually formatted as: 'X is a form of Y'
Stock Issues
(Argument from) Cause
Accident
Categorical (Syllogism)
13. Asks - 'is it?' Involves a question of fact (past - present - future)
Cure
Structural (inherency)
Hyperbole
Conjectural (Stasis)
14. Affirming or denying a point strongly by asking it as a question; also called a 'rhetorical question'
Erotema
Gorgias
Appeal to Authority
Unrepresentative Sample
15. Asks - 'what is it?' Involves a question of meaning when a debate turns to the proper definition of terms.
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Anadiplosis
Definitional (Stasis)
Narrative
16. _____ said that concerning all things - there are two contradictory arguments that exist in opposition to one another.
Protagoras
Hyperbole
Ill
Accident
17. Inference that allows you to move from grounds to claim (often implied in the argument)
Small Sample
Warrant
Categorical (Syllogism)
Manufactroversy
18. Ideas repeated
Second
Exergasia
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Ad Hominem
19. A manufactured controversy that is motivated by profit or extreme ideology to intentionally create confusion in the public about an issue of scientific fact that is not in dispute by the scientific community. Used to stop debate at the conjectural le
Manufactroversy
Agree on Commonality then refute
Blame
Sign
20. Are there enough examples to prove that point? Are the examples skewed toward one type of thing? Are the examples unambiguous? Could it be that the connection of general and specific doesn't hold in this case?
Conceding Arguments
Checking for Example argument
Analogy
Formal Logic
21. Can the sign be found without the thing for which it stands? Is an alternative explanation of the maning of the sign more credible? Are there countering signs that indicate that his one sign is false?
Intelligence
Checking for Sign argument
Epanalepsis
Begging the Question
22. Anticipatory refutation - in which you preempt an opposition argument before it is even offered.
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Prolepsis
Manufactroversy
Ill
23. Arguing that one thing caused another without sufficient evidence of a causal relationship.
Claim
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Questionable Cause
Checking for Example argument
24. Incorrectly assuming that one choice or another must be made when other choices are available or when no choice must be made
Term I/Term II
False Dichotomy
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
25. Obligation of the arguer advocating change to overcome the presumption through argument
Claim
Term I/Term II
Red Herring
Burden of proof
26. Defending something by pointing out that your opponent did it as well. Also called 'two wrongs make a right'; this is literally translated as 'thou also'
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Tu Quoque
Narrative
Simile
27. Taking the absence of evidence against something as justification for believing that thing is true.
Begging the Question
Agree on Commonality then refute
Checking for Cause argement
Appeal to Ignorance
28. These seats or commonplaces of argument suggest inferences that arguers might make that are based on the habits of thought and value hierarchies that everyone shares
Corax
Warrant
Cost
Loci of the Preferable
29. A metaphor with a vehicle that draws upon a human experience that is universal
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Questionable Cause
Hasty Generalization
Special Topoi
30. All A are B - all C are B - therefore no A are C
Refutation Strategies
Conjectural (Stasis)
Conceding Arguments
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
31. Is a variation of Appeal to Ignorance. It is when you accept an argument that the presumption lies with one side and the other side has the burden of proving its case when the reverse is actually true
Second
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Testimony
Vehicle (and) Tenor
32. Value Hierarchy Visualization in terms of high and low values (?/?)
Epanalepsis
Checking for Sign argument
Burden of proof
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
33. Show that an opponent's argument actually supports your side of the debate (often accompanied by a flip in values)
Ethos
Special Topoi
Turn
Arguments
34. Conjectural - Procedural - Definitional - and Qualitative Points are all ____
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
35. An argument with true premises and valid form
Sound
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Qualitative (Stasis)
Cost
36. Faling to bring relevant evidence to bear on an argument
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Begging the Question
False Charge of Fallacy
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
37. Does the moral really follow from the story? Is the narrative plausible and coherent? Are the characterizations consistent?
Special Topoi
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
Checking for Narrative argument
Associated Commonplaces
38. Focuses on inadequacies or problems in the status quo - must be significant if a change is to be made. Must Have: 1. Quantitative significance: affects lots of people 2. Qualitative significance: is of bad quality
Ill
False Dichotomy
Begging the Question
Parallelism
39. If A then B A Therefore B
Modus Ponens
Formal Debate
Analogy
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
40. All A are B - all C are B - therefore all A are C
Parallelism
Blame
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
41. Values what is at the core or essence of a group (or class) rather than what is at the margins
Warrant
Division
Locus of Essence
Archetypal (Metaphor)
42. Ammending a term or phrase you have just read
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Correctio
Value-Oriented Arguments
Sign
43. Knowledge - Experience - Prudence (What part of Ethos)
Hyperbole
Intelligence
Second (or) Third
Litotes
44. Oral performances that have a set format in which two or more speakers take turns making arguments and counterarguments before an audience - Examples: Court room - candidate debates - academic debates
Formal Debate
Incrementum
Value-Oriented Arguments
Situationally flawed
45. Is another variation of the tu quoque; it is when you justify a wrong by saying that this is the way things have always been done
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
Mercenary Scientists
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
46. Shifting the buren of proof is a category of ____ __ _____
Appeal to Ignorance
Ad Populum
Narrative
Commonplaces
47. Providing a response to each reason that an opponent gives
Exergasia
Direct Refutation
Testimony
Hyperbole
48. 'X causes Y' is a warrant for what argument
Simile
Situationally flawed
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
Erotema
49. Is a variety of Hasty Generalization; it is when you draw conclusions about a population on the basis of a sample that is too small to be a reliable measure of that population
Small Sample
Refutation Strategies
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Definitional (Stasis)
50. Value Hierarchy Visualization
Term I/Term II
Epanalepsis
Protagoras
Non Sequitur