SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Opposite of Anaphora
Special Topoi
Non Sequitur
Epistrophe
Syllogism
2. Attempts to assign responsibility for the existence of the ill to the current system. Needs to connect the ill to the policy in order for it to be changed. Must Have: 1. Structural Inherency: bad structure/lack of structure 2. Attitudinal Inherency:
Mercenary Scientists
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Debate Resolutions
Blame
3. Is the metaphor overused - heard so many times that it becomes tedious rather than persuasive?
Cliche
Intelligence
Sophist
Popular Democracy
4. Ask a rhetorical question
Litotes
Protagoras
Erotema
Non Sequitur
5. Similarity of structure in a pair or series of related words - phrases - or clauses
Fallacies
Corax
Parallelism
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
6. Does one thing really cause the other - or are they merely correlated? Is there another larger cause or series of causes that better explains the effect?
Ad Populum
Charisma
Red Herring
Checking for Cause argement
7. What order do definitional and qualitative stasis usually fall into when put into an argument?
Second
(Fallacy of) Accident
Second (or) Third
Blame
8. Part of blame stock issue - the composition of the policy is flawed
Formal Debate
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Structural (inherency)
Rhetoric
9. The inference reasons from meaning or lesson of a story to a claim. The warrant usually says 'The moral to a story tells us a greater truth'
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Good Will (Ethos)
(Argument from) Narrative
(Argument from) Cause
10. If A then B Not B Therefore not A
Division
Valid
Locus of Existence
Modus Tollens
11. All A are B -X is A - therefore - X is B OR All A are B - all B are C - therefore - all A are C OR All A are B - all C are A - therefore - all C are B
Formal Logic
Epanalepsis
Categorical (Syllogism)
(Argument from) Testimony
12. 1. Applying the tests of reasoning to show weaknesses in arguments and develop counterarguments 2. Accusing opponent of using fallacious reasoning 3. Pointing out a flawed metaphor 4. Discrediting the ethos of opponent 5. Pointing out flawed statisti
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
Tools of Refutation
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
Special Topoi
13. All A are B - all C are B - therefore no A are C
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Refutation Strategies
Unsound
14. Agreeing to some of the arguments made by your opponents so that you can focus on others
Conceding Arguments
(Argument by) Analogy
Decorum
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
15. Opposite of anadiplosis
(Argument by) Example
Epanalepsis
Aristotle
Accident
16. Ill - Blame - Cure - Cost
Stock Issues
Definitional (Stasis)
Narrative
Antithesis
17. Any logical system that abstracts the form of statements away from their content in order to establish abstract criteria of consistency and validity
Formal Logic
Incrementum
Categorical (Syllogism)
Second (or) Third
18. Uses emotional appeal instead of evidence to argue
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Quantitative (significance)
Consistency
Modus Ponens
19. What vehicles and tenors share
Deductive Reasoning
Associated Commonplaces
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
Hasty Generalization
20. These are commonplaces for argument drawn from the specific set of values shared by a particular community of experience and interest
Quantitative (significance)
Epanalepsis
Special Topoi
Appeal to Authority
21. Is another variety of Hasty Generalization. It is when you reason from a sample that is not representative (typical) of the population from which it was drawn.
Erotema
Unrepresentative Sample
Anadiplosis
Commonplaces
22. _____ thought that the most worthy study is one that advances the student's ability to speak and deliberate on affairs of the state.
Composition
Consistency
Isocrates
Intelligence
23. Have both claims - reason - and at least two sides
Mixed Metaphor
Hasty Generalization
Composition
Arguments
24. 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true' is a warrant for what arg?
Second (or) Third
Testimony
Anaphora
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
25. Term with lower (negative) value
Formal Logic
Hyperbole
Questionable Cause
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
26. The process of discrediting someone's argument by revealing weaknesses in it or presenting a counterargument
Non Sequitur
Refutation
Presumption
Deductive Reasoning
27. Does the moral really follow from the story? Is the narrative plausible and coherent? Are the characterizations consistent?
Non Sequitur
Checking for Narrative argument
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
(Fallacy of) Accident
28. An argument that either lacks validity - soundness or both.
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Unsound
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Shifting the Burden of Proof
29. Providing a response to each reason that an opponent gives
Gorgias
(Argument from) Narrative
Tu Quoque
Direct Refutation
30. Accepting an argument that you should believe something is true just because the majority believes it is true.
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Simile
Ad Populum
Agree on Commonality then refute
31. Based on the setting - which dictates the ____ ____ used to determine who has won the debate - E.g. Academic Policy Debate: stock issues Criminal Court Case: beyond a reasonable doubt Civil Courtroom: preponderance of evidence This Classroom: were yo
Commonplaces
Small Sample
Decision Rules
Epanalepsis
32. Affirming or denying a point strongly by asking it as a question; also called a 'rhetorical question'
Metaphor
Sophist
Incrementum
Erotema
33. Ending of one repeated at the beginning of another
Arguments
Anadiplosis
Hyperbole
Begging the Question
34. Repetition of the same word or groups of words at the beginning of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
Anaphora
Appeal to Authority
Equivocation
Corax
35. A syllogism suppressing the Major Premise - and only contains a Minor Premise and the Conclusion. People speak in these more often than syllogisms.
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Accident
Enthymeme
Questionable Cause
36. Prolepsis - Direct Refutation - Conceding some points to focus on others - Agree on commonality then refute - and Turn are all examples of _____ ______
Term I/Term II
Refutation Strategies
Blame
Categorical (Syllogism)
37. All A are B - all C are B - therefore all A are C
Conceding Arguments
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Personification
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
38. Shifting the buren of proof is a category of ____ __ _____
Ill
Tools of Refutation
Appeal to Ignorance
Toulmin Model
39. The system for classifying disassociated terms (visually)
Structural (inherency)
Value Hierarchies
Burden of Rejoinder
Euphimism
40. Circular Reasoning
Begging the Question
Blame
Conceding Arguments
Checking for Sign argument
41. The requirement that the opposition responds reasonably to all significant issues presented by the advocate of change.
Common Practice (Fallacy)
Hasty Generalization
Unequivocal
Burden of Rejoinder
42. Defending something by pointing out that your opponent did it as well. Also called 'two wrongs make a right'; this is literally translated as 'thou also'
Epanalepsis
Tu Quoque
Categorical (Syllogism)
Corax
43. Metaphors use ____ and ____
Prolepsis
Vehicle (and) Tenor
(Argument of ) General probability
Appeal to Authority
44. Opposite of Hyperbole
Litotes
Sign
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Appeal to Ignorance
45. Repetition of the endings of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
Stock Issues
Rhetoric
Metaphor
Epistrophe
46. Value Hierarchy Visualization in terms of high and low values (?/?)
Epistrophe
Definitional (Stasis)
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Checking for Example argument
47. Qualitative significance is part of what stock issue?
Appeal to Ignorance
Questionable Cause
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Ill
48. 'What is true in this case is true in general' or 'What is true in general is true in this case' Is a warrant for what kind of argument?
Example
Antithesis
Ill
Antithesis
49. Arguing that one thing caused another without sufficient evidence of a causal relationship.
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
Questionable Cause
False Dichotomy
(Argument of ) General probability
50. Repetition of the ending of one clause or sentence at the beginning of another.
Disassociation of Concepts
Anadiplosis
Formal Debate
Cliche