SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 'Bad eggs are all you are likely to get from a bad crow' was said where?
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
Tokenism
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Checking for Example argument
2. What vehicles and tenors share
Burden of proof
Protagoras
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Associated Commonplaces
3. Puritan morality - change and progress - equality of opportunity - rejection of authority - achievement and success
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Formal Logic
Presumption
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
4. Usually has three parts: 1. (MP) Major Premise - unequivocal statement 2. (mP) Minor Premise - about a specific case 3. (C) Conclusion - follows necessarily from the premises
Testimony
Agree on Commonality then refute
Unequivocal
Syllogism
5. A manufactured controversy that is motivated by profit or extreme ideology to intentionally create confusion in the public about an issue of scientific fact that is not in dispute by the scientific community. Used to stop debate at the conjectural le
Hasty Generalization
(Special Topoi for) Republicans
Manufactroversy
Burden of proof
6. Asks - 'of what kind is it?' Involves a question of the quality of the act - whether it is good or bad.
Qualitative (Stasis)
Second (or) Third
Formal Debate
Value Hierarchies
7. Metaphors use ____ and ____
Metaphor
Enthymeme
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Vehicle (and) Tenor
8. Asks - 'what is it?' Involves a question of meaning when a debate turns to the proper definition of terms.
Decision Rules
Definitional (Stasis)
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Conjectural (Stasis)
9. Relative advantages and disadvantages of the new policy. Are the adverse effects going to outweigh the benefits?
Cost
Burden of Rejoinder
(Argument from) Testimony
Ambiguity
10. Special Topoi and Loci of the Preferable - what kind of args?
Value-Oriented Arguments
Litotes
Modus Tollens
Composition
11. Did not pay Corax for sophistry lessons and was taken to court
Personification
Quantitative (significance)
Tisias
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
12. If A then B If B then C Therefore - if A then C
Locus of Existence
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Epanalepsis
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
13. Term with higher (positive) value
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
Value-Oriented Arguments
Metaphor
Term I/Term II
14. Who developed the argument from general probability?
Hyperbole
Sign
Rhetoric
Corax
15. Values what is concrete rather than what is merely possible
Epistrophe
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Erotema
Locus of Existence
16. Does one thing really cause the other - or are they merely correlated? Is there another larger cause or series of causes that better explains the effect?
Protagoras
Incrementum
Definitional (Stasis)
Checking for Cause argement
17. Ill - Blame - Cure - Cost
Locus of Quality
Ad Hominem
Stock Issues
Anadiplosis
18. It does not follow - Red Herring belongs to this category
Epanalepsis
Checking for Example argument
Locus of Quantity
Non Sequitur
19. Most fallacies are ____ ____; that is if the argument were to employ difference evidence - or be offered in different circumstances - it would be perfectly fine - but in the specific case in which it is identified as a fallacy - it is flawed
Arguments
Unequivocal
Loci of the Preferable
Situationally flawed
20. If A then B B Therefore - A
Blame
Example
Mixed Metaphor
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
21. An argument with true premises and valid form
Sound
Popular Democracy
Qualitative (Stasis)
Sign
22. _____ rejected rhetoric as flattery - not truth - a 'knack' on par with 'cookery' and 'cosmetics'
False Dichotomy
Appeal to Ignorance
Rhetoric
Plato
23. An argument that follows proper logical form
Commonplaces
Small Sample
Valid
Equivocation
24. Honesty - Dedication - Courage (What part of Ethos)
Burden of proof
(Fallacy of) Accident
Good Moral Character
Epanalepsis
25. All A are B -no B are C - therefore - no A are C
Euphimism
Categorical (Syllogism)
Rhetoric
Cost
26. Qualitative significance is part of what stock issue?
Locus of Quantity
Analogy
Ill
Simile
27. Can the sign be found without the thing for which it stands? Is an alternative explanation of the maning of the sign more credible? Are there countering signs that indicate that his one sign is false?
Fallacies
Checking for Sign argument
Appeal to Ignorance
Questionable Analogy
28. What kind of commonplaces 'deflect reality'
Ambiguity
Non Sequitur
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Corax
29. Knowledge - Experience - Prudence (What part of Ethos)
Burden of proof
(Argument by) Analogy
Sophist
Intelligence
30. Indicating that something (the claim) is or is not. Is an argument from _____ ? (not a stasis point)
Sign
Second (or) Third
Refutation Potential
Good Moral Character
31. Affirming or denying a point strongly by asking it as a question; also called a 'rhetorical question'
Anadiplosis
Checking for Example argument
Corax
Erotema
32. A syllogism suppressing the Major Premise - and only contains a Minor Premise and the Conclusion. People speak in these more often than syllogisms.
Enthymeme
Accident
Plato
Emotionally Charged (Language)
33. Draws a conclusion about an entire entity based on knowledge about all of its parts
Modus Ponens
Composition
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Euphimism
34. Using a term in an argument in one sense in one place and another sense in another place
Good Moral Character
Argument
Equivocation
(Argument by) Analogy
35. Based on the setting - which dictates the ____ ____ used to determine who has won the debate - E.g. Academic Policy Debate: stock issues Criminal Court Case: beyond a reasonable doubt Civil Courtroom: preponderance of evidence This Classroom: were yo
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Decision Rules
Composition
Good Moral Character
36. Juxtaposition of contrasting words or ideas
Informal Debate
Appeal to Authority
Good Moral Character
Antithesis
37. The inference reasons from meaning or lesson of a story to a claim. The warrant usually says 'The moral to a story tells us a greater truth'
(Argument by) Example
(Argument from) Narrative
Epanalepsis
Checking for Sign argument
38. Values what is unique - irreplaceable or original
Tu Quoque
Locus of Quality
Aristotle
(Argument from) Narrative
39. Anticipatory refutation - in which you preempt an opposition argument before it is even offered.
Loci of the Preferable
Prolepsis
Begging the Question
Tisias
40. Good Moral Character
Sophist
Refutation Potential
Hyperbole
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
41. The inference moves from specific to general or from general to specific. The warrant to this argument usually reads 'what is true in this case is true in general' or 'what is true in general is true in this case'
Erotema
Tools of Refutation
False Dichotomy
(Argument by) Example
42. Is a variation of the non sequiter; it is when the irrelevant reason is meant to divert the attention of the audience from the real issue
Locus of Quality
Conjectural (Stasis)
Blame
Red Herring
43. Ending of one repeated at the beginning of another
Anaphora
Metaphor
Tu Quoque
Anadiplosis
44. What places do procedural stasis usually occupy in an argument?
Second (or) Third
Burden of Rejoinder
Questionable Cause
(Argument by) Analogy
45. Is the metaphor appropriate? The key to ____ is matching strategy to situation.
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Decorum
Begging the Question
46. Consistency - Decorum - Refutation Potential - Cliche and Mixed _____ are forms of judging ______(s)
Consistency
Protagoras
Refutation
Metaphor
47. An argument that either lacks validity - soundness or both.
Term I/Term II
Prolepsis
Erotema
Unsound
48. Leaving no doubt - unambiguous
Second (or) Third
Locus of Essence
Checking for Analogy argument
Unequivocal
49. The inference reasons that what a trustworthy source says is true. The warrant to this argument usually says - 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true'
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
(Argument from) Testimony
Hyperbole
Locus of Existence
50. Misrepresenting an opponent's position as more extreme than it really is and then attacking that version - or attacking a weaker opponent while ignoring a stronger one.
Ill
Straw Person
Modus Tollens
Hasty Generalization