SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Focuses on inadequacies or problems in the status quo - must be significant if a change is to be made. Must Have: 1. Quantitative significance: affects lots of people 2. Qualitative significance: is of bad quality
Ill
Unrepresentative Sample
Isocrates
Value Hierarchies
2. 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true' is a warrant for what arg?
Testimony
Isocrates
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Litotes
3. What is 'at issue' in a controversy; the place where two sides of an argument come into conflict; the clash between arguments.
Stasis
Sound
Associated Commonplaces
Consistency
4. The inference reasons that what a trustworthy source says is true. The warrant to this argument usually says - 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true'
(Argument from) Testimony
Direct Refutation
Appeal to Ignorance
Anadiplosis
5. What order do definitional and qualitative stasis usually fall into when put into an argument?
Checking for Narrative argument
Corax
Second
Ethos
6. Term with lower (negative) value
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Epistrophe
Stock Issues
Popular Democracy
7. Specific evidence or reason to support the claim (often introduced with the words 'because' or 'since')
Begging the Question
Grounds (or data)
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Litotes
8. Bases inferences on what we know of how people act in a rational/predictable way - in order to determine the truth
Associated Commonplaces
Antithesis
Vehicle (and) Tenor
(Argument of ) General probability
9. Associated words or ideas with a vehicle or tenor
Deductive Reasoning
Conceding Arguments
Commonplaces
Refutation Strategies
10. Opposite of anadiplosis
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Manufactroversy
Valid
Epanalepsis
11. Is a variation of the tu quoque; it is when you justify a wrong by saying that most other people do it too.
Epistrophe
Common Practice (Fallacy)
Tisias
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
12. Defending something by pointing out that your opponent did it as well. Also called 'two wrongs make a right'; this is literally translated as 'thou also'
Gorgias
Tu Quoque
Incrementum
Rhetoric
13. If A then B If B then C Therefore - if A then C
Modus Tollens
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Direct Refutation
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
14. Special Topoi and Loci of the Preferable - what kind of args?
Erotema
Parallelism
Value-Oriented Arguments
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
15. Most fallacies are ____ ____; that is if the argument were to employ difference evidence - or be offered in different circumstances - it would be perfectly fine - but in the specific case in which it is identified as a fallacy - it is flawed
Refutation
Unequivocal
Situationally flawed
Accident
16. An irrelevant attack on an opponent rather than on the opponent's evidence or arguments; this is literally translated as an argument 'to the person'
Correctio
Ad Hominem
Unequivocal
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
17. Values what is at the core or essence of a group (or class) rather than what is at the margins
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Composition
Locus of Essence
Decision Rules
18. Agreeing to some of the arguments made by your opponents so that you can focus on others
(Argument of ) General probability
Conceding Arguments
Hyperbole
Presumption
19. Does the argument effectively appeal to audience values and priorities? Does the argument accurately capture the values at play in this situation?
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Erotema
Anadiplosis
Testimony
20. Qualitative significance is part of what stock issue?
Straw Person
Ill
Disassociation of Concepts
Rhetoric
21. Civil rights - economic justice - environmental stewardship - government as safety net - worker's rights - diversity
Charisma
(Argument from) Sign
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Archetypal (Metaphor)
22. Use of a word or phrase that could have several meanings
Ambiguity
Presumption
Deductive Reasoning
Claim
23. Involves a large number of people; from Ill stock issue - Produces a large amount of harm; from Ill stock issue
Checking for Narrative argument
Gorgias
Arguments
Quantitative (significance)
24. Term with higher (positive) value
Aristotle
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
25. The inference reasons from meaning or lesson of a story to a claim. The warrant usually says 'The moral to a story tells us a greater truth'
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Checking for Analogy argument
(Argument from) Narrative
Good Moral Character
26. Oppostite of Litotes
Antithesis
Appeal to Ignorance
Anadiplosis
Hyperbole
27. The inference compares two similar things - saying that since they are alike in some respects - they are alike in another respect. It can be a figurative analogy or a literal analogy. The warrant usually reads: 'if two things are alike in most respec
Formal Logic
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Informal Debate
(Argument by) Analogy
28. Is another variation of the tu quoque; it is when you justify a wrong by saying that this is the way things have always been done
Burden of Rejoinder
Parallelism
Procedural (Stasis)
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
29. When more than one vehicle is used for the same tenor - and those vehicles appear in close proximity to each other
Mixed Metaphor
Epistrophe
Analogy
Anadiplosis
30. A metaphor with a vehicle that draws upon a human experience that is universal
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
Correctio
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Questionable Analogy
31. An explicit metaphor that overtly compares two things - often using the words 'like' or 'as'
Simile
Deductive Reasoning
Correctio
Parallelism
32. Understatement
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
Procedural (Stasis)
Composition
Litotes
33. Opposite of Anaphora
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Ad Hominem
Epistrophe
Checking for Example argument
34. ______ are hired to create manufactroversy
Mercenary Scientists
Appeal to Authority
Analogy
Burden of Rejoinder
35. Taking one idea and dividing it into two parts - disengaging the two resulting ideas - giving a positive value to one (Term II) and a lesser or negative value to the other (Term I). These are often based on the appearance/reality pair.
Litotes
Modus Tollens
Disassociation of Concepts
Blame
36. An implicit comparison made by referring to one thing as another
Ill
Division
Decorum
Metaphor
37. Deliberate correction
Fallacies
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Appeal to Authority
Correctio
38. Is another variety of Hasty Generalization. It is when you reason from a sample that is not representative (typical) of the population from which it was drawn.
Appeal to Ignorance
Direct Refutation
Unrepresentative Sample
Unsound
39. Personal charm - sex appeal - leadership qualities (Ethos)
Toulmin Model
Charisma
(Argument from) Sign
Division
40. Ending repeated
Blame
Composition
Epistrophe
Modus Ponens
41. Structure repeated
(Argument of ) General probability
Modus Ponens
Term I/Term II
Parallelism
42. Opposite of Hyperbole
Burden of Rejoinder
Litotes
Associated Commonplaces
Tisias
43. Structural inherency and attitudinal inherency are part of what stock issue?
Exergasia
Blame
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
First
44. Oral performances that have a set format in which two or more speakers take turns making arguments and counterarguments before an audience - Examples: Court room - candidate debates - academic debates
Formal Debate
Situationally flawed
Parallelism
Unequivocal
45. Inference that allows you to move from grounds to claim (often implied in the argument)
Categorical (Syllogism)
Hyperbole
Epanalepsis
Warrant
46. What kind of commonplaces 'deflect reality'
Rhetoric
Epanalepsis
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Modus Ponens
47. Values what is unique - irreplaceable or original
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Hyperbole
Checking for Cause argement
Locus of Quality
48. Providing a response to each reason that an opponent gives
Hyperbole
Locus of Existence
Testimony
Direct Refutation
49. Arguing that the conclusion of an argument must be untrue because there is a fallacy in the reasoning. (Just because the premises may not be true - does not mean that the conclusion has to be false)
Hasty Generalization
Begging the Question
Fallacy Fallacy
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
50. Draws a conclusion about the PARTS of an ENTITY based on knowledge about the whole entity.
Sophist
Division
Testimony
Term II (Disassociation Pair)