SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Knowledge - Experience - Prudence (What part of Ethos)
Intelligence
Exergasia
Modus Tollens
Ambiguity
2. Agree with the values or goals of the opposition - but then argue that the opposition doesn't do a better job of achieving those values goals
Enthymeme
Parallelism
Presumption
Agree on Commonality then refute
3. Specific evidence or reason to support the claim (often introduced with the words 'because' or 'since')
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Definitional (Stasis)
Loci of the Preferable
Grounds (or data)
4. Term with higher (positive) value
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
Syllogism
Small Sample
Second (or) Third
5. A _____ is not just abuse or contradiction
Special Topoi
Argument
Tu Quoque
Anaphora
6. Ending of one repeated at the beginning of another
Begging the Question
(Argument from) Narrative
Anadiplosis
Questionable Cause
7. Ideas repeated
Analogy
Exergasia
Epanalepsis
Agree on Commonality then refute
8. What order do definitional and qualitative stasis usually fall into when put into an argument?
Division
(Argument from) Cause
False Charge of Fallacy
Second
9. The list that builds
Incrementum
Tools of Refutation
Consistency
Hasty Generalization
10. Literally - 'wise one' ; taught rhetoric to citizenry
Anadiplosis
Refutation Strategies
Modus Ponens
Sophist
11. Accepting a token gesture for something more substantive
Tokenism
Checking for Sign argument
Turn
Checking for Analogy argument
12. Are the two things really alike - or are there significant differences that might make them unalike in this respect? Are the negative consequences to comparing these two things? Is the analogy clear or confusing?
Correctio
Checking for Analogy argument
Non Sequitur
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
13. Consistency - Decorum - Refutation Potential - Cliche and Mixed _____ are forms of judging ______(s)
Charisma
Modus Ponens
Analogy
Metaphor
14. beginning repeated at ending
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Status
Division
Epanalepsis
15. _______ in ancient Greece spurred the need for the use of rhetoric in everyday life.
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Anaphora
Direct Refutation
Popular Democracy
16. Who developed the argument from general probability?
Corax
Tu Quoque
Qualitative (Stasis)
Categorical (Syllogism)
17. Does the moral really follow from the story? Is the narrative plausible and coherent? Are the characterizations consistent?
Checking for Narrative argument
Checking for Example argument
Deductive Reasoning
Shifting the Burden of Proof
18. Arguing without evidence that a given event is the first of a series of steps that will inevitably lead to some outcome.
Deductive Reasoning
Euphimism
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Hasty Generalization
19. The requirement that the opposition responds reasonably to all significant issues presented by the advocate of change.
Burden of Rejoinder
Example
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
Refutation Potential
20. Structure repeated
Appeal to Ignorance
Parallelism
Rhetoric
Claim
21. Can the sign be found without the thing for which it stands? Is an alternative explanation of the maning of the sign more credible? Are there countering signs that indicate that his one sign is false?
Sophist
Anaphora
Checking for Sign argument
Tu Quoque
22. _____ said that concerning all things - there are two contradictory arguments that exist in opposition to one another.
Locus of Quantity
Protagoras
Disassociation of Concepts
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
23. If A then B A Therefore B
Simile
Modus Ponens
Narrative
Tu Quoque
24. Ending repeated
Epistrophe
Blame
Toulmin Model
Burden of proof
25. Show that an opponent's argument actually supports your side of the debate (often accompanied by a flip in values)
Valid
Turn
Aristotle
(Argument from) Cause
26. The inference reasons that what a trustworthy source says is true. The warrant to this argument usually says - 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true'
(Argument from) Testimony
Litotes
Informal Debate
Red Herring
27. Opposite of Hyperbole
Litotes
Appeal to Ignorance
Toulmin Model
Checking for Narrative argument
28. Arguing that the conclusion of an argument must be untrue because there is a fallacy in the reasoning. (Just because the premises may not be true - does not mean that the conclusion has to be false)
Metaphor
Tisias
Fallacy Fallacy
Value-Oriented Arguments
29. Does one thing really cause the other - or are they merely correlated? Is there another larger cause or series of causes that better explains the effect?
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Unrepresentative Sample
Hyperbole
Checking for Cause argement
30. What places do procedural stasis usually occupy in an argument?
Procedural (Stasis)
Turn
Second (or) Third
Non Sequitur
31. Affirming or denying a point strongly by asking it as a question; also called a 'rhetorical question'
Erotema
Modus Ponens
Non Sequitur
Cure
32. Bases inferences on what we know of how people act in a rational/predictable way - in order to determine the truth
Begging the Question
(Argument of ) General probability
(Argument from) Testimony
Hyperbole
33. A metaphor with a vehicle that draws upon experience that is specific to a particular culture
Informal Debate
Epistrophe
(Argument from) Cause
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
34. Repetition of the same idea - changing either its words - its delivery - or the general treatment it is given.
Exergasia
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
Tu Quoque
Second
35. Civil rights - economic justice - environmental stewardship - government as safety net - worker's rights - diversity
Charisma
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Popular Democracy
Appeal to Ignorance
36. All A are B - all C are B - therefore all A are C
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Appeal to Authority
Rhetoric
Presumption
37. Incorrectly assuming that one choice or another must be made when other choices are available or when no choice must be made
Associated Commonplaces
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
False Dichotomy
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
38. The inference compares two similar things - saying that since they are alike in some respects - they are alike in another respect. It can be a figurative analogy or a literal analogy. The warrant usually reads: 'if two things are alike in most respec
Fallacies
Decorum
Checking for Narrative argument
(Argument by) Analogy
39. Using information from mercenary scientists is committing what fallacy?
Appeal to Authority
Gorgias
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Categorical (Syllogism)
40. Faling to bring relevant evidence to bear on an argument
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Commonplaces
Epistrophe
Good Will (Ethos)
41. Is the metaphor appropriate? The key to ____ is matching strategy to situation.
Decorum
(Argument from) Sign
Modus Tollens
Epanalepsis
42. Opposite of Epistrophe
Anaphora
Correctio
Common Practice (Fallacy)
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
43. After this - therefore on account of this
Good Will (Ethos)
Appeal to Ignorance
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Structural (inherency)
44. A metaphor that gives attributes to a nonhuman thing
Unrepresentative Sample
Personification
Informal Debate
(Argument from) Testimony
45. Exaggeration
Prolepsis
Hyperbole
Ad Hominem
Burden of proof
46. Ill - Blame - Cure - Cost
Stock Issues
Epanalepsis
Locus of Quantity
(Fallacy of) Accident
47. What is 'at issue' in a controversy; the place where two sides of an argument come into conflict; the clash between arguments.
Stasis
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Straw Person
Cure
48. Is necessary to defend the weak against the strong - Is useful and necessary to the state and the individual because you become a more thoughtful citizen and a more well-rounded person - Is useful to have the tools to recognize good arguments and def
Rhetoric
Refutation Potential
Syllogism
Antithesis
49. An implicit comparison made by referring to one thing as another
Sophist
Metaphor
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Division
50. What vehicles and tenors share
Formal Debate
Associated Commonplaces
Non Sequitur
Parallelism