SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The inference moves from cause to effect or effect to cause - arguing that something is the direct result of something else. The warrant to this argument is usually formatted as: 'X is a form of Y'
Exergasia
Small Sample
(Argument from) Cause
Cost
2. Is a variety of Hasty Generalization; it is when you draw conclusions about a population on the basis of a sample that is too small to be a reliable measure of that population
Plato
Grounds (or data)
Attitudinal (inherency)
Small Sample
3. The inference reasons that what a trustworthy source says is true. The warrant to this argument usually says - 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true'
Red Herring
Presumption
(Argument from) Testimony
Checking for Sign argument
4. Values what is unique - irreplaceable or original
Anadiplosis
Refutation
Locus of Quality
Rhetoric
5. Is necessary to defend the weak against the strong - Is useful and necessary to the state and the individual because you become a more thoughtful citizen and a more well-rounded person - Is useful to have the tools to recognize good arguments and def
Direct Refutation
Checking for Example argument
Modus Ponens
Rhetoric
6. An irrelevant attack on an opponent rather than on the opponent's evidence or arguments; this is literally translated as an argument 'to the person'
Commonplaces
Ad Hominem
Loci of the Preferable
Tisias
7. Structural inherency and attitudinal inherency are part of what stock issue?
Mercenary Scientists
(Fallacy of) Accident
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
Blame
8. Prolepsis - Direct Refutation - Conceding some points to focus on others - Agree on commonality then refute - and Turn are all examples of _____ ______
Anadiplosis
Refutation Strategies
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Non Sequitur
9. The process of discrediting someone's argument by revealing weaknesses in it or presenting a counterargument
Litotes
Blame
Refutation
Non Sequitur
10. Any logical system that abstracts the form of statements away from their content in order to establish abstract criteria of consistency and validity
Exergasia
Formal Logic
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Tokenism
11. Arguing that the conclusion of an argument must be untrue because there is a fallacy in the reasoning. (Just because the premises may not be true - does not mean that the conclusion has to be false)
Ad Hominem
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
Fallacy Fallacy
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
12. Anticipatory refutation - in which you preempt an opposition argument before it is even offered.
Tools of Refutation
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
Ill
Prolepsis
13. Is a variation of Appeal to Ignorance. It is when you accept an argument that the presumption lies with one side and the other side has the burden of proving its case when the reverse is actually true
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Informal Debate
Enthymeme
Anadiplosis
14. Attempts to assign responsibility for the existence of the ill to the current system. Needs to connect the ill to the policy in order for it to be changed. Must Have: 1. Structural Inherency: bad structure/lack of structure 2. Attitudinal Inherency:
Debate Resolutions
Sign
Blame
(Argument of ) General probability
15. Grounds ---> Claim | Warrant
Second
Corax
Toulmin Model
Red Herring
16. Puritan morality - change and progress - equality of opportunity - rejection of authority - achievement and success
Manufactroversy
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
Ad Populum
False Charge of Fallacy
17. Incorrectly assuming that what is true of the whole is true of the parts
Parallelism
Division
Analogy
Charisma
18. Draws a conclusion about an entire entity based on knowledge about all of its parts
Hyperbole
Composition
Checking for Example argument
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
19. Literally - 'wise one' ; taught rhetoric to citizenry
Epanalepsis
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Small Sample
Sophist
20. The inference compares two similar things - saying that since they are alike in some respects - they are alike in another respect. It can be a figurative analogy or a literal analogy. The warrant usually reads: 'if two things are alike in most respec
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Fallacies
(Argument by) Analogy
Manufactroversy
21. The system for classifying disassociated terms (visually)
Value Hierarchies
Good Moral Character
Epistrophe
Qualitative (Stasis)
22. The inference reasons from meaning or lesson of a story to a claim. The warrant usually says 'The moral to a story tells us a greater truth'
Burden of Rejoinder
Example
(Argument from) Narrative
Ad Populum
23. Value Hierarchy Visualization in terms of high and low values (?/?)
Burden of proof
Cure
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
24. An argument that follows proper logical form
Categorical (Syllogism)
Refutation
Arguments
Valid
25. What kind of commonplaces 'deflect reality'
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Anadiplosis
Hyperbole
Formal Logic
26. A or B Not A Therefore - B
Antithesis
Small Sample
Term I/Term II
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
27. Opposite of Anaphora
Ambiguity
Quantitative (significance)
Epistrophe
(Argument from) Narrative
28. Ask a rhetorical question
Anaphora
Questionable Analogy
Erotema
Stock Issues
29. Ill - Blame - Cure - Cost
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Stock Issues
(Special Topoi for) Science
Situationally flawed
30. Repetition of the same word or groups of words at the beginning of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
Anaphora
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Composition
Accident
31. Use of a word or phrase that could have several meanings
Equivocation
Conceding Arguments
Erotema
Ambiguity
32. Involves a large number of people; from Ill stock issue - Produces a large amount of harm; from Ill stock issue
Testimony
Quantitative (significance)
Value Hierarchies
Common Practice (Fallacy)
33. Is another variation of the tu quoque; it is when you justify a wrong by saying that this is the way things have always been done
Value Hierarchies
Arguments
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Rhetoric
34. Relative advantages and disadvantages of the new policy. Are the adverse effects going to outweigh the benefits?
Cost
Appeal to Authority
Incrementum
Simile
35. Opposite of Hyperbole
Plato
Stock Issues
Conceding Arguments
Litotes
36. Is another variety of Hasty Generalization. It is when you reason from a sample that is not representative (typical) of the population from which it was drawn.
Small Sample
Informal Debate
Hyperbole
Unrepresentative Sample
37. Providing a response to each reason that an opponent gives
Protagoras
Correctio
Associated Commonplaces
Direct Refutation
38. Consistency - Decorum - Refutation Potential - Cliche and Mixed _____ are forms of judging ______(s)
Locus of Essence
Metaphor
Sophist
Isocrates
39. Asks - 'is it?' Involves a question of fact (past - present - future)
Sign
Refutation Potential
Conjectural (Stasis)
Ad Hominem
40. When more than one vehicle is used for the same tenor - and those vehicles appear in close proximity to each other
Conjectural (Stasis)
Mixed Metaphor
Anadiplosis
Questionable Analogy
41. Oral performances that have a set format in which two or more speakers take turns making arguments and counterarguments before an audience - Examples: Court room - candidate debates - academic debates
Metaphor
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Formal Debate
Grounds (or data)
42. 'What is true in this case is true in general' or 'What is true in general is true in this case' Is a warrant for what kind of argument?
Non Sequitur
Cure
Deductive Reasoning
Example
43. Using information from mercenary scientists is committing what fallacy?
Litotes
Erotema
Second
Appeal to Authority
44. Similarity of structure in a pair or series of related words - phrases - or clauses
Parallelism
Tisias
Presumption
Prolepsis
45. _____ thought that rhetoric is the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion
Anadiplosis
Composition
Categorical (Syllogism)
Aristotle
46. Arguing without evidence that a given event is the first of a series of steps that will inevitably lead to some outcome.
Grounds (or data)
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Formal Logic
Commonplaces
47. Understatement
Stock Issues
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Litotes
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
48. The belief that current thinking - attitudes - values - and actions will continue in the absence of good arguments for their change
Presumption
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Checking for Cause argement
49. Is the metaphor appropriate? The key to ____ is matching strategy to situation.
Decorum
Division
Tokenism
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
50. 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true' is a warrant for what arg?
Unequivocal
Testimony
Stasis
Exergasia