SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Uses emotional appeal instead of evidence to argue
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Analogy
Anaphora
Litotes
2. Taught by sophists; provides tools to recognize good arguments from bad ones
Checking for Cause argement
Checking for Narrative argument
Rhetoric
Begging the Question
3. Common practice and traditional wisdom fallacies are categories of _____
Exergasia
Value Hierarchies
Tu Quoque
Non Sequitur
4. Asks - 'is it?' Involves a question of fact (past - present - future)
Loci of the Preferable
Tools of Refutation
Conjectural (Stasis)
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
5. Assuming as a premise some form of the very point that is at issue - the very conclusion we intend to prove. Also called circular reasoning.
Definitional (Stasis)
Begging the Question
Value-Oriented Arguments
Good Moral Character
6. Values more over less in terms of quantitative outcomes (the greatest good for the greatest number)
Stasis
Debate Resolutions
Appeal to Ignorance
Locus of Quantity
7. What kind of commonplaces 'deflect reality'
Warrant
Composition
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
8. Focuses on inadequacies or problems in the status quo - must be significant if a change is to be made. Must Have: 1. Quantitative significance: affects lots of people 2. Qualitative significance: is of bad quality
Ill
Agree on Commonality then refute
Analogy
Incrementum
9. Ill - Blame - Cure - Cost
Quantitative (significance)
Ad Hominem
Checking for Example argument
Stock Issues
10. Values what is concrete rather than what is merely possible
Sign
Hyperbole
Correctio
Locus of Existence
11. These are commonplaces for argument drawn from the specific set of values shared by a particular community of experience and interest
Special Topoi
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Erotema
12. Arguments that are flawed (not from formal logic)
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Fallacies
Ad Populum
Sign
13. Value Hierarchy Visualization in terms of high and low values (?/?)
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Argument
Anadiplosis
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
14. A manufactured controversy that is motivated by profit or extreme ideology to intentionally create confusion in the public about an issue of scientific fact that is not in dispute by the scientific community. Used to stop debate at the conjectural le
Checking for Example argument
Syllogism
Analogy
Manufactroversy
15. Whitewashes the effect of your topic to downplay it; less emotional than appropriate
False Dichotomy
Attitudinal (inherency)
Arguments
Euphimism
16. Values what is at the core or essence of a group (or class) rather than what is at the margins
Claim
Locus of Existence
Locus of Essence
Mercenary Scientists
17. Ending of one repeated at the beginning of another
Cost
Anadiplosis
Arguments
Questionable Analogy
18. Letters to the editor - group discussions - talk show
Informal Debate
Checking for Sign argument
False Dichotomy
Parallelism
19. Incorrectly assuming that one choice or another must be made when other choices are available or when no choice must be made
Checking for Example argument
(Special Topoi for) Science
Correctio
False Dichotomy
20. The requirement that the opposition responds reasonably to all significant issues presented by the advocate of change.
Anadiplosis
Antithesis
Burden of Rejoinder
Simile
21. 'What is true in this case is true in general' or 'What is true in general is true in this case' Is a warrant for what kind of argument?
Composition
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
Example
Rhetoric
22. Metaphors use ____ and ____
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Red Herring
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
23. These seats or commonplaces of argument suggest inferences that arguers might make that are based on the habits of thought and value hierarchies that everyone shares
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Loci of the Preferable
Composition
Value Hierarchies
24. What order do definitional and qualitative stasis usually fall into when put into an argument?
Equivocation
(Argument of ) General probability
Second
Epanalepsis
25. Attempts to assign responsibility for the existence of the ill to the current system. Needs to connect the ill to the policy in order for it to be changed. Must Have: 1. Structural Inherency: bad structure/lack of structure 2. Attitudinal Inherency:
Procedural (Stasis)
Blame
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Grounds (or data)
26. Indicating that something (the claim) is or is not. Is an argument from _____ ? (not a stasis point)
Syllogism
Deductive Reasoning
Sign
Conceding Arguments
27. What places do procedural stasis usually occupy in an argument?
Modus Ponens
Example
False Dichotomy
Second (or) Third
28. Are there associated commonplaces for this metaphor that can be turned against the arguer?
Prolepsis
Epanalepsis
Refutation Potential
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
29. Ammending a term or phrase you have just read
Locus of Quantity
Begging the Question
Non Sequitur
Correctio
30. Puritan morality - change and progress - equality of opportunity - rejection of authority - achievement and success
Epanalepsis
Tisias
Formal Debate
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
31. What order does conjectural stasis usually fall in when arguing?
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
First
Division
Turn
32. Is a variety of questionable cause; it is when you conclude that something cause dsomething else just because the second thing came after it; literally translated as 'after this - therefore on account of this'
Syllogism
Ethos
Decorum
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
33. The belief that current thinking - attitudes - values - and actions will continue in the absence of good arguments for their change
Burden of Rejoinder
Presumption
Categorical (Syllogism)
Epanalepsis
34. beginning repeated at ending
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Attitudinal (inherency)
First
Epanalepsis
35. All A are B - all C are B - therefore all A are C
Analogy
Procedural (Stasis)
Value-Oriented Arguments
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
36. Ending repeated
Epistrophe
Rhetoric
(Fallacy of) Accident
Stock Issues
37. All A are B -X is A - therefore - X is B OR All A are B - all B are C - therefore - all A are C OR All A are B - all C are A - therefore - all C are B
Loci of the Preferable
Parallelism
Categorical (Syllogism)
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
38. Honesty - Dedication - Courage (What part of Ethos)
Good Moral Character
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Modus Tollens
Anaphora
39. Religious liberty - limited government - entrepreneurship - military strength - traditional institutions - property rights
Sign
(Special Topoi for) Republicans
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Attitudinal (inherency)
40. Is the source qualified to say what is being said? Is she or he in a position to know this information? Does the testimony represent what the authority really meant to say? Is the source relatively unbiased and recent?
Anadiplosis
Rhetoric
Ambiguity
Checking for Testimony argument
41. Personal charm - sex appeal - leadership qualities (Ethos)
Tisias
Modus Ponens
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Charisma
42. Is a variation of the tu quoque; it is when you justify a wrong by saying that most other people do it too.
Rhetoric
Epanalepsis
Hyperbole
Common Practice (Fallacy)
43. Show that an opponent's argument actually supports your side of the debate (often accompanied by a flip in values)
Incrementum
Warrant
Turn
Begging the Question
44. 1. Applying the tests of reasoning to show weaknesses in arguments and develop counterarguments 2. Accusing opponent of using fallacious reasoning 3. Pointing out a flawed metaphor 4. Discrediting the ethos of opponent 5. Pointing out flawed statisti
Anaphora
Gorgias
Categorical (Syllogism)
Tools of Refutation
45. Ask a rhetorical question
Erotema
Modus Ponens
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
46. Opposite of Epistrophe
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
Euphimism
Anaphora
Presumption
47. Term with higher (positive) value
Burden of proof
(Argument from) Narrative
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
Term I/Term II
48. Accepting the word of an alleged authority when we should not because the person does not have expertise on this particular issue or s/he cannot be trusted to give an unbiased opinion.
Value-Oriented Arguments
Litotes
Enthymeme
Appeal to Authority
49. Shifting the buren of proof is a category of ____ __ _____
Euphimism
Procedural (Stasis)
Appeal to Ignorance
Mercenary Scientists
50. Incorrectly assuming that what is true of the parts is true of the whole
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Composition
First
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence