SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. An argument that follows proper logical form
Tu Quoque
Locus of Existence
(Argument from) Narrative
Valid
2. Does the argument effectively appeal to audience values and priorities? Does the argument accurately capture the values at play in this situation?
Parallelism
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Intelligence
Presumption
3. Assuming as a premise some form of the very point that is at issue - the very conclusion we intend to prove. Also called circular reasoning.
Associated Commonplaces
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Checking for Narrative argument
Begging the Question
4. What is 'at issue' in a controversy; the place where two sides of an argument come into conflict; the clash between arguments.
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Ambiguity
First
Stasis
5. Using information from mercenary scientists is committing what fallacy?
Appeal to Authority
Composition
Checking for Sign argument
(Argument by) Example
6. Literally - 'wise one' ; taught rhetoric to citizenry
Locus of Essence
Sophist
Sign
(Fallacy of) Accident
7. An explicit metaphor that overtly compares two things - often using the words 'like' or 'as'
Litotes
Simile
Good Will (Ethos)
Checking for Cause argement
8. These are commonplaces for argument drawn from the specific set of values shared by a particular community of experience and interest
Modus Ponens
Special Topoi
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
9. Incorrectly assuming that what is true of the whole is true of the parts
(Argument by) Analogy
Division
Questionable Cause
Straw Person
10. Repetition of the same idea - changing either its words - its delivery - or the general treatment it is given.
Incrementum
Questionable Analogy
Locus of Quantity
Exergasia
11. A or B Not A Therefore - B
Toulmin Model
Litotes
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
Personification
12. 'X causes Y' is a warrant for what argument
Tisias
Equivocation
Anaphora
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
13. Draws a conclusion about an entire entity based on knowledge about all of its parts
Attitudinal (inherency)
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Composition
Intelligence
14. Puritan morality - change and progress - equality of opportunity - rejection of authority - achievement and success
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
Commonplaces
Arguments
Checking for Testimony argument
15. Involves a large number of people; from Ill stock issue - Produces a large amount of harm; from Ill stock issue
Quantitative (significance)
Arguments
Composition
Deductive Reasoning
16. After this - therefore on account of this
Informal Debate
Correctio
Analogy
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
17. A syllogism suppressing the Major Premise - and only contains a Minor Premise and the Conclusion. People speak in these more often than syllogisms.
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Ill
Enthymeme
Protagoras
18. Reasoning from case to case
Composition
Unequivocal
Corax
Analogy
19. Accepting a token gesture for something more substantive
Conjectural (Stasis)
Checking for Testimony argument
Tokenism
Definitional (Stasis)
20. Opposite of Hyperbole
Locus of Quality
Epanalepsis
Litotes
Checking for Narrative argument
21. If A then B Not A Therefore not B
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
Tokenism
Composition
Anaphora
22. _____ rejected rhetoric as flattery - not truth - a 'knack' on par with 'cookery' and 'cosmetics'
Unrepresentative Sample
Plato
Erotema
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
23. All A are B -X is A - therefore - X is B OR All A are B - all B are C - therefore - all A are C OR All A are B - all C are A - therefore - all C are B
Exergasia
Categorical (Syllogism)
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Conjectural (Stasis)
24. Are the two things really alike - or are there significant differences that might make them unalike in this respect? Are the negative consequences to comparing these two things? Is the analogy clear or confusing?
Conjectural (Stasis)
Checking for Analogy argument
Anaphora
Metaphor
25. Bases inferences on what we know of how people act in a rational/predictable way - in order to determine the truth
Rhetoric
Associated Commonplaces
Anadiplosis
(Argument of ) General probability
26. Anticipatory refutation - in which you preempt an opposition argument before it is even offered.
Prolepsis
Division
Tisias
Non Sequitur
27. The inference moves from cause to effect or effect to cause - arguing that something is the direct result of something else. The warrant to this argument is usually formatted as: 'X is a form of Y'
Hasty Generalization
Attitudinal (inherency)
(Argument from) Cause
Sign
28. What places do procedural stasis usually occupy in an argument?
Situationally flawed
Analogy
Associated Commonplaces
Second (or) Third
29. Understatement
Accident
Refutation
Rhetoric
Litotes
30. Are the terms of the metaphor coherent - or does it tell a story or paint a picure that fails to make sense internally?
(Special Topoi for) Science
Refutation Strategies
Consistency
Ambiguity
31. Whitewashes the effect of your topic to downplay it; less emotional than appropriate
Definitional (Stasis)
Division
Categorical (Syllogism)
Euphimism
32. The inference moves from specific to general or from general to specific. The warrant to this argument usually reads 'what is true in this case is true in general' or 'what is true in general is true in this case'
(Argument by) Example
Isocrates
Conceding Arguments
Deductive Reasoning
33. Does the moral really follow from the story? Is the narrative plausible and coherent? Are the characterizations consistent?
Exergasia
Small Sample
Checking for Narrative argument
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
34. Term with higher (positive) value
Second
Modus Ponens
Appeal to Ignorance
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
35. A metaphor with a vehicle that draws upon experience that is specific to a particular culture
Formal Debate
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Straw Person
Commonplaces
36. Appeals from the character of the speaker
Ethos
Quantitative (significance)
Checking for Sign argument
Questionable Cause
37. Agreeing to some of the arguments made by your opponents so that you can focus on others
Appeal to Authority
Exergasia
Conceding Arguments
Parallelism
38. Originality - explanatory power - quantitative precision - simplicity - scope
(Special Topoi for) Science
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Checking for Example argument
Turn
39. Values what is at the core or essence of a group (or class) rather than what is at the margins
Categorical (Syllogism)
Turn
Parallelism
Locus of Essence
40. Ending repeated
Charisma
First
Epistrophe
Second (or) Third
41. ______ are hired to create manufactroversy
Mercenary Scientists
Conceding Arguments
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Cost
42. All A are B - all C are B - therefore all A are C
Ill
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Anaphora
43. _____ thought that rhetoric is the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion
Tisias
Disassociation of Concepts
Aristotle
(Fallacy of) Accident
44. Based on the setting - which dictates the ____ ____ used to determine who has won the debate - E.g. Academic Policy Debate: stock issues Criminal Court Case: beyond a reasonable doubt Civil Courtroom: preponderance of evidence This Classroom: were yo
Decision Rules
Epistrophe
Anaphora
Epanalepsis
45. Conjectural - Procedural - Definitional - and Qualitative Points are all ____
46. Deliberate correction
Attitudinal (inherency)
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Correctio
Emotionally Charged (Language)
47. Are there associated commonplaces for this metaphor that can be turned against the arguer?
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
Sign
Refutation Potential
Turn
48. Accepting an argument that you should believe something is true just because the majority believes it is true.
(Argument by) Analogy
Fallacy Fallacy
Turn
Ad Populum
49. Is a variety of Hasty Generalization; it is when you draw conclusions about a population on the basis of a sample that is too small to be a reliable measure of that population
(Argument from) Sign
Small Sample
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Sound
50. Uses emotional appeal instead of evidence to argue
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
Metaphor
Deductive Reasoning
Emotionally Charged (Language)