SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Professional Standing - Fame (Ethos)
Fallacy Fallacy
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Status
(Argument from) Testimony
2. Is a variation of the non sequiter; it is when the irrelevant reason is meant to divert the attention of the audience from the real issue
Conjectural (Stasis)
Anadiplosis
Euphimism
Red Herring
3. Is necessary to defend the weak against the strong - Is useful and necessary to the state and the individual because you become a more thoughtful citizen and a more well-rounded person - Is useful to have the tools to recognize good arguments and def
Division
(Special Topoi for) Science
Rhetoric
Conceding Arguments
4. Using information from mercenary scientists is committing what fallacy?
Argument
Appeal to Authority
Fallacy Fallacy
Incrementum
5. _____ thought that the most worthy study is one that advances the student's ability to speak and deliberate on affairs of the state.
Exergasia
Ad Populum
Isocrates
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
6. A metaphor that gives attributes to a nonhuman thing
Refutation Strategies
Personification
Modus Ponens
Deductive Reasoning
7. Four categories of the Loci of the Preferable
Agree on Commonality then refute
Checking for Cause argement
Intelligence
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
8. What order does conjectural stasis usually fall in when arguing?
Sign
Appeal to Ignorance
Epistrophe
First
9. Faling to bring relevant evidence to bear on an argument
Procedural (Stasis)
Erotema
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
(Argument from) Testimony
10. _____ thought that rhetoric is the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion
Debate Resolutions
Tisias
Checking for Analogy argument
Aristotle
11. Arguing without evidence that a given event is the first of a series of steps that will inevitably lead to some outcome.
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Sign
Litotes
Isocrates
12. Literally - 'wise one' ; taught rhetoric to citizenry
Gorgias
Arguments
Sophist
Refutation
13. Accepting the word of an alleged authority when we should not because the person does not have expertise on this particular issue or s/he cannot be trusted to give an unbiased opinion.
Hyperbole
Appeal to Authority
Composition
Term I/Term II
14. Using a term in an argument in one sense in one place and another sense in another place
Syllogism
Parallelism
Valid
Equivocation
15. Taking the absence of evidence against something as justification for believing that thing is true.
Sign
Consistency
Appeal to Ignorance
Metaphor
16. Wrote 'On Not Being' and 'In Defense of Helen'
Consistency
Checking for Cause argement
Gorgias
Sign
17. Values what is at the core or essence of a group (or class) rather than what is at the margins
Loci of the Preferable
Non Sequitur
Locus of Essence
Erotema
18. Providing a response to each reason that an opponent gives
Good Moral Character
Decision Rules
Common Practice (Fallacy)
Direct Refutation
19. 'What is true in this case is true in general' or 'What is true in general is true in this case' Is a warrant for what kind of argument?
Special Topoi
Example
Equivocation
Hasty Generalization
20. Taught by sophists; provides tools to recognize good arguments from bad ones
Checking for Analogy argument
Rhetoric
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Burden of Rejoinder
21. ______ are hired to create manufactroversy
Rhetoric
Mercenary Scientists
Gorgias
Enthymeme
22. Repetition of the endings of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Presumption
Epistrophe
Checking for Example argument
23. A _____ is not just abuse or contradiction
Ethos
Sign
Argument
Division
24. Are the terms of the metaphor coherent - or does it tell a story or paint a picure that fails to make sense internally?
Analogy
Consistency
Checking for Narrative argument
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
25. Part of blame stock issue - the composition of the policy is flawed
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Qualitative (Stasis)
Erotema
Structural (inherency)
26. Asks - 'is it?' Involves a question of fact (past - present - future)
Hyperbole
(Special Topoi for) Science
False Dichotomy
Conjectural (Stasis)
27. Did not pay Corax for sophistry lessons and was taken to court
Tisias
Deductive Reasoning
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Quantitative (significance)
28. All A are B -no B are C - therefore - no A are C
Testimony
Categorical (Syllogism)
Epanalepsis
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
29. What order do definitional and qualitative stasis usually fall into when put into an argument?
Second
(Argument from) Cause
Analogy
Appeal to Ignorance
30. beginning repeated at ending
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Ad Hominem
Cliche
Epanalepsis
31. Most fallacies are ____ ____; that is if the argument were to employ difference evidence - or be offered in different circumstances - it would be perfectly fine - but in the specific case in which it is identified as a fallacy - it is flawed
Situationally flawed
Non Sequitur
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
False Dichotomy
32. Set two things in opposition
Term I/Term II
False Charge of Fallacy
Antithesis
Composition
33. The process of discrediting someone's argument by revealing weaknesses in it or presenting a counterargument
Refutation
(Argument from) Narrative
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Informal Debate
34. Prolepsis - Direct Refutation - Conceding some points to focus on others - Agree on commonality then refute - and Turn are all examples of _____ ______
Refutation Strategies
Epanalepsis
Loci of the Preferable
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
35. Understatement
Charisma
Hyperbole
Anadiplosis
Litotes
36. Focuses on inadequacies or problems in the status quo - must be significant if a change is to be made. Must Have: 1. Quantitative significance: affects lots of people 2. Qualitative significance: is of bad quality
Value-Oriented Arguments
Hyperbole
Charisma
Ill
37. Ill - Blame - Cure - Cost
Tools of Refutation
Stock Issues
(Argument by) Example
Charisma
38. The requirement that the opposition responds reasonably to all significant issues presented by the advocate of change.
Ad Populum
Burden of Rejoinder
Corax
(Argument from) Narrative
39. Ask a rhetorical question
Epanalepsis
Erotema
(Argument from) Cause
Hasty Generalization
40. Opposite of anadiplosis
Consistency
Tu Quoque
Narrative
Epanalepsis
41. A metaphor with a vehicle that draws upon experience that is specific to a particular culture
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
(Argument by) Analogy
Stasis
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
42. Are there associated commonplaces for this metaphor that can be turned against the arguer?
Division
Ad Hominem
Refutation Potential
Cliche
43. If A then B A Therefore B
Anaphora
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Modus Ponens
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
44. Circular Reasoning
Appeal to Authority
Claim
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
Begging the Question
45. Qualitative significance is part of what stock issue?
Debate Resolutions
Hyperbole
Appeal to Authority
Ill
46. An argument that follows proper logical form
Good Moral Character
Conceding Arguments
Valid
Modus Ponens
47. Can the sign be found without the thing for which it stands? Is an alternative explanation of the maning of the sign more credible? Are there countering signs that indicate that his one sign is false?
Checking for Sign argument
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Accident
(Argument from) Narrative
48. Ending of one repeated at the beginning of another
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Appeal to Ignorance
Anadiplosis
Quantitative (significance)
49. 1. Applying the tests of reasoning to show weaknesses in arguments and develop counterarguments 2. Accusing opponent of using fallacious reasoning 3. Pointing out a flawed metaphor 4. Discrediting the ethos of opponent 5. Pointing out flawed statisti
Tools of Refutation
Burden of proof
Formal Debate
(Fallacy of) Accident
50. Does one thing really cause the other - or are they merely correlated? Is there another larger cause or series of causes that better explains the effect?
Good Moral Character
Questionable Cause
Checking for Cause argement
Grounds (or data)