SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Assuming as a premise some form of the very point that is at issue - the very conclusion we intend to prove. Also called circular reasoning.
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Begging the Question
Composition
Questionable Analogy
2. The process of using logic to draw conclusions from given facts - definitions - and properties
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Sign
Division
Deductive Reasoning
3. If A then B Not B Therefore not A
Example
Modus Tollens
Argument
Incrementum
4. Relative advantages and disadvantages of the new policy. Are the adverse effects going to outweigh the benefits?
Cost
Testimony
Categorical (Syllogism)
Ambiguity
5. Values more over less in terms of quantitative outcomes (the greatest good for the greatest number)
Division
Locus of Essence
Analogy
Locus of Quantity
6. Opposite of Anaphora
Quantitative (significance)
Begging the Question
Euphimism
Epistrophe
7. Term with higher (positive) value
Fallacy Fallacy
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
Example
(Argument by) Analogy
8. The proposition or conclusion that the arguer is advancing
Claim
Second (or) Third
Litotes
Testimony
9. Does the moral really follow from the story? Is the narrative plausible and coherent? Are the characterizations consistent?
First
Testimony
Checking for Narrative argument
Shifting the Burden of Proof
10. Show that an opponent's argument actually supports your side of the debate (often accompanied by a flip in values)
(Argument by) Example
Turn
Epistrophe
Consistency
11. Puritan morality - change and progress - equality of opportunity - rejection of authority - achievement and success
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
Exergasia
Litotes
Cure
12. They stablish an arena for argumentation by defining ground for a dispute and issues of controversy. Typically - one side affirms the resolution and one side negates the resolution.
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Epanalepsis
(Argument by) Analogy
Debate Resolutions
13. Ammending a term or phrase you have just read
Correctio
Incrementum
Non Sequitur
Turn
14. Misrepresenting an opponent's position as more extreme than it really is and then attacking that version - or attacking a weaker opponent while ignoring a stronger one.
Parallelism
Straw Person
Appeal to Authority
Rhetoric
15. Most fallacies are ____ ____; that is if the argument were to employ difference evidence - or be offered in different circumstances - it would be perfectly fine - but in the specific case in which it is identified as a fallacy - it is flawed
Deductive Reasoning
Situationally flawed
Popular Democracy
Checking for Sign argument
16. Providing a response to each reason that an opponent gives
Anadiplosis
Direct Refutation
Testimony
Correctio
17. Are the two things really alike - or are there significant differences that might make them unalike in this respect? Are the negative consequences to comparing these two things? Is the analogy clear or confusing?
Modus Ponens
Arguments
Checking for Analogy argument
Straw Person
18. All A are B -no B are C - therefore - no A are C
Informal Debate
Accident
(Argument from) Sign
Categorical (Syllogism)
19. Who developed the argument from general probability?
Corax
Litotes
Debate Resolutions
Special Topoi
20. A or B Not A Therefore - B
Analogy
(Argument of ) General probability
Testimony
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
21. Is the source qualified to say what is being said? Is she or he in a position to know this information? Does the testimony represent what the authority really meant to say? Is the source relatively unbiased and recent?
Checking for Testimony argument
Parallelism
Epanalepsis
Antithesis
22. Affirming or denying a point strongly by asking it as a question; also called a 'rhetorical question'
Metaphor
Parallelism
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Erotema
23. The process of discrediting someone's argument by revealing weaknesses in it or presenting a counterargument
Refutation
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Mercenary Scientists
Refutation Strategies
24. Is the metaphor overused - heard so many times that it becomes tedious rather than persuasive?
Situationally flawed
Cliche
Appeal to Authority
Erotema
25. Is necessary to defend the weak against the strong - Is useful and necessary to the state and the individual because you become a more thoughtful citizen and a more well-rounded person - Is useful to have the tools to recognize good arguments and def
Ad Hominem
Rhetoric
Conjectural (Stasis)
Hyperbole
26. Accepting a token gesture for something more substantive
Sophist
(Argument from) Narrative
Tokenism
Charisma
27. Understatement
Refutation
Non Sequitur
Anadiplosis
Litotes
28. Reasoning from case to case
Incrementum
Analogy
Qualitative (Stasis)
Refutation Strategies
29. Honesty - Dedication - Courage (What part of Ethos)
Anadiplosis
Questionable Cause
Hyperbole
Good Moral Character
30. Indicating that something (the claim) is or is not. Is an argument from _____ ? (not a stasis point)
Blame
Sound
Attitudinal (inherency)
Sign
31. Professional Standing - Fame (Ethos)
Status
Term I/Term II
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Refutation
32. Involves a large number of people; from Ill stock issue - Produces a large amount of harm; from Ill stock issue
Quantitative (significance)
Unrepresentative Sample
Questionable Cause
Ill
33. Draws a conclusion about the PARTS of an ENTITY based on knowledge about the whole entity.
Division
Epanalepsis
Grounds (or data)
Procedural (Stasis)
34. Ask a rhetorical question
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
Erotema
Tu Quoque
Rhetoric
35. Oral performances that have a set format in which two or more speakers take turns making arguments and counterarguments before an audience - Examples: Court room - candidate debates - academic debates
Consistency
Decorum
Intelligence
Formal Debate
36. The inference reasons that what a trustworthy source says is true. The warrant to this argument usually says - 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true'
(Argument from) Testimony
Ad Populum
Presumption
Questionable Analogy
37. Leaving no doubt - unambiguous
Unequivocal
Tokenism
Warrant
Direct Refutation
38. Arguing that the conclusion of an argument must be untrue because there is a fallacy in the reasoning. (Just because the premises may not be true - does not mean that the conclusion has to be false)
Fallacy Fallacy
(Fallacy of) Accident
Litotes
(Argument by) Analogy
39. Shifting the buren of proof is a category of ____ __ _____
Appeal to Ignorance
Value Hierarchies
Status
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
40. The requirement that the opposition responds reasonably to all significant issues presented by the advocate of change.
Burden of Rejoinder
Mercenary Scientists
Tisias
Epistrophe
41. Is a variation of the non sequiter; it is when the irrelevant reason is meant to divert the attention of the audience from the real issue
Red Herring
Ill
Parallelism
Begging the Question
42. Any logical system that abstracts the form of statements away from their content in order to establish abstract criteria of consistency and validity
Anaphora
Formal Logic
Attitudinal (inherency)
Metaphor
43. Is a variety of questionable cause; it is when you conclude that something cause dsomething else just because the second thing came after it; literally translated as 'after this - therefore on account of this'
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Anaphora
Cure
Ad Populum
44. Repetition of the ending of one clause or sentence at the beginning of another.
Rhetoric
Anadiplosis
Checking for Cause argement
Checking for Example argument
45. Good Moral Character
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Tu Quoque
Anadiplosis
Second (or) Third
46. Values what is at the core or essence of a group (or class) rather than what is at the margins
(Argument from) Sign
Corax
Plato
Locus of Essence
47. This is the name for fallacies that do not have another name but that involve a claim that does not follow from the premises (e.g. the evidence is not relevant or not appropriate to support the claim). Litterally translated as 'it does not follow -'
Mixed Metaphor
First
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Non Sequitur
48. These seats or commonplaces of argument suggest inferences that arguers might make that are based on the habits of thought and value hierarchies that everyone shares
Charisma
Value Hierarchies
Loci of the Preferable
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
49. Values what is unique - irreplaceable or original
Term I/Term II
Appeal to Ignorance
Locus of Quality
(Argument by) Analogy
50. Opposite of Hyperbole
Litotes
Parallelism
Incrementum
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)