SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Is a variation of Appeal to Ignorance. It is when you accept an argument that the presumption lies with one side and the other side has the burden of proving its case when the reverse is actually true
Toulmin Model
(Argument by) Example
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Direct Refutation
2. Show that an opponent's argument actually supports your side of the debate (often accompanied by a flip in values)
Correctio
Conceding Arguments
Unrepresentative Sample
Turn
3. Wrote 'On Not Being' and 'In Defense of Helen'
Enthymeme
Hasty Generalization
Categorical (Syllogism)
Gorgias
4. Taught by sophists; provides tools to recognize good arguments from bad ones
Rhetoric
Blame
Litotes
Locus of Quantity
5. Personal charm - sex appeal - leadership qualities (Ethos)
Appeal to Authority
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
Charisma
Hyperbole
6. Common practice and traditional wisdom fallacies are categories of _____
Tu Quoque
Enthymeme
(Argument of ) General probability
Warrant
7. Draws a conclusion about an entire entity based on knowledge about all of its parts
Anaphora
Composition
Ill
Valid
8. Value Hierarchy Visualization in terms of high and low values (?/?)
Non Sequitur
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Agree on Commonality then refute
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
9. Opposite of anadiplosis
Appeal to Ignorance
Epanalepsis
Refutation
Sophist
10. Based on the setting - which dictates the ____ ____ used to determine who has won the debate - E.g. Academic Policy Debate: stock issues Criminal Court Case: beyond a reasonable doubt Civil Courtroom: preponderance of evidence This Classroom: were yo
Good Moral Character
Decision Rules
Mixed Metaphor
Anadiplosis
11. Demonstrating respect and care for the audience
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
Disassociation of Concepts
Good Will (Ethos)
Attitudinal (inherency)
12. Arguing that the conclusion of an argument must be untrue because there is a fallacy in the reasoning. (Just because the premises may not be true - does not mean that the conclusion has to be false)
Anaphora
Decorum
Epanalepsis
Fallacy Fallacy
13. Repetition of the same word or groups of words at the beginning of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
Anadiplosis
Anaphora
Term I/Term II
Analogy
14. A manufactured controversy that is motivated by profit or extreme ideology to intentionally create confusion in the public about an issue of scientific fact that is not in dispute by the scientific community. Used to stop debate at the conjectural le
Status
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Manufactroversy
Locus of Quality
15. Does one thing really cause the other - or are they merely correlated? Is there another larger cause or series of causes that better explains the effect?
Sound
Tisias
Checking for Cause argement
Turn
16. The requirement that the opposition responds reasonably to all significant issues presented by the advocate of change.
Conceding Arguments
Example
Burden of Rejoinder
Checking for Cause argement
17. Is a variety of Hasty Generalization; it is when you draw conclusions about a population on the basis of a sample that is too small to be a reliable measure of that population
Correctio
Attitudinal (inherency)
Formal Logic
Small Sample
18. Arguing that one thing caused another without sufficient evidence of a causal relationship.
Begging the Question
Turn
Questionable Cause
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
19. Using information from mercenary scientists is committing what fallacy?
Erotema
Appeal to Authority
False Dichotomy
Charisma
20. _______ in ancient Greece spurred the need for the use of rhetoric in everyday life.
Decision Rules
Analogy
Non Sequitur
Popular Democracy
21. The proposition or conclusion that the arguer is advancing
Claim
Mixed Metaphor
Valid
Value-Oriented Arguments
22. Consistency - Decorum - Refutation Potential - Cliche and Mixed _____ are forms of judging ______(s)
Rhetoric
Metaphor
False Dichotomy
(Argument from) Testimony
23. Four categories of the Loci of the Preferable
Arguments
Isocrates
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
24. A or B Not A Therefore - B
Popular Democracy
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
(Argument from) Sign
Situationally flawed
25. Originality - explanatory power - quantitative precision - simplicity - scope
Accident
Hyperbole
(Special Topoi for) Science
Narrative
26. Asks - 'is it?' Involves a question of fact (past - present - future)
Appeal to Authority
Conjectural (Stasis)
Categorical (Syllogism)
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
27. Is the metaphor overused - heard so many times that it becomes tedious rather than persuasive?
Litotes
Cliche
Presumption
Emotionally Charged (Language)
28. Can the sign be found without the thing for which it stands? Is an alternative explanation of the maning of the sign more credible? Are there countering signs that indicate that his one sign is false?
Toulmin Model
Checking for Sign argument
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
Exergasia
29. Is a variety of questionable cause; it is when you conclude that something cause dsomething else just because the second thing came after it; literally translated as 'after this - therefore on account of this'
Erotema
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Epanalepsis
Mixed Metaphor
30. Asks - 'what is it?' Involves a question of meaning when a debate turns to the proper definition of terms.
Definitional (Stasis)
Special Topoi
Straw Person
Hasty Generalization
31. All A are B - all C are B - therefore no A are C
Tools of Refutation
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Non Sequitur
32. Values more over less in terms of quantitative outcomes (the greatest good for the greatest number)
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Grounds (or data)
Litotes
Locus of Quantity
33. An argument that follows proper logical form
Appeal to Ignorance
Valid
Formal Logic
Aristotle
34. Accepting a token gesture for something more substantive
Tokenism
Procedural (Stasis)
Incrementum
Sophist
35. An explicit metaphor that overtly compares two things - often using the words 'like' or 'as'
Correctio
Locus of Essence
Presumption
Simile
36. An argument that either lacks validity - soundness or both.
(Argument from) Sign
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
Unsound
Epistrophe
37. Usually has three parts: 1. (MP) Major Premise - unequivocal statement 2. (mP) Minor Premise - about a specific case 3. (C) Conclusion - follows necessarily from the premises
Consistency
Syllogism
Ambiguity
Checking for Cause argement
38. _____ rejected rhetoric as flattery - not truth - a 'knack' on par with 'cookery' and 'cosmetics'
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
Plato
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
Unrepresentative Sample
39. _____ thought that the most worthy study is one that advances the student's ability to speak and deliberate on affairs of the state.
Attitudinal (inherency)
Tisias
Isocrates
Qualitative (Stasis)
40. The process of using logic to draw conclusions from given facts - definitions - and properties
(Argument from) Narrative
Deductive Reasoning
Ad Hominem
Euphimism
41. Values what is concrete rather than what is merely possible
Locus of Existence
Questionable Analogy
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
42. Juxtaposition of contrasting words or ideas
(Argument by) Example
Decision Rules
Locus of Existence
Antithesis
43. Faling to bring relevant evidence to bear on an argument
Composition
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Warrant
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
44. _____ said that concerning all things - there are two contradictory arguments that exist in opposition to one another.
Protagoras
Tools of Refutation
Checking for Example argument
Consistency
45. Good Moral Character
Burden of proof
Fallacies
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Debate Resolutions
46. Is a variation of the tu quoque; it is when you justify a wrong by saying that most other people do it too.
Common Practice (Fallacy)
Incrementum
Special Topoi
Good Will (Ethos)
47. Term with higher (positive) value
Questionable Analogy
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
Shifting the Burden of Proof
48. 'If two things are alike in most respects - they will be alike in this respect too' Warrant for what arg?
Appeal to Ignorance
Tokenism
Unequivocal
Analogy
49. Is another variety of Hasty Generalization. It is when you reason from a sample that is not representative (typical) of the population from which it was drawn.
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Unrepresentative Sample
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
False Dichotomy
50. Fallacious argument from specific to general without sufficient evidence - Draws a conclusion about all the members of a group based on the knowledge of some members
Anaphora
Refutation
Testimony
Hasty Generalization