SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Special Topoi and Loci of the Preferable - what kind of args?
Value-Oriented Arguments
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Qualitative (Stasis)
Epanalepsis
2. Puritan morality - change and progress - equality of opportunity - rejection of authority - achievement and success
Simile
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
(Argument from) Testimony
Protagoras
3. Exaggeration
Hyperbole
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Composition
(Fallacy of) Accident
4. Uses emotional appeal instead of evidence to argue
Aristotle
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Cost
Exergasia
5. Focuses on inadequacies or problems in the status quo - must be significant if a change is to be made. Must Have: 1. Quantitative significance: affects lots of people 2. Qualitative significance: is of bad quality
Informal Debate
Valid
Ill
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
6. Demonstrating respect and care for the audience
(Argument from) Sign
Warrant
Good Will (Ethos)
Burden of Rejoinder
7. 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true' is a warrant for what arg?
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Checking for Testimony argument
Testimony
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
8. If A then B A Therefore B
Straw Person
Modus Ponens
Composition
(Argument by) Analogy
9. Grounds ---> Claim | Warrant
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
Second (or) Third
Toulmin Model
Isocrates
10. Is the metaphor appropriate? The key to ____ is matching strategy to situation.
Disassociation of Concepts
Decorum
Correctio
Common Practice (Fallacy)
11. Beginning repeated
Stasis
Anaphora
Metaphor
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
12. A field of scholarship devoted to how arguments work
Gorgias
Aristotle
Rhetoric
Antithesis
13. Deliberate correction
Division
Locus of Quantity
(Special Topoi for) Science
Correctio
14. Ammending a term or phrase you have just read
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Correctio
Procedural (Stasis)
Cure
15. Does the argument effectively appeal to audience values and priorities? Does the argument accurately capture the values at play in this situation?
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Arguments
Ambiguity
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
16. Professional Standing - Fame (Ethos)
Mercenary Scientists
Status
Example
Equivocation
17. This is the name for fallacies that do not have another name but that involve a claim that does not follow from the premises (e.g. the evidence is not relevant or not appropriate to support the claim). Litterally translated as 'it does not follow -'
Appeal to Ignorance
Rhetoric
Litotes
Non Sequitur
18. Asks - 'what is it?' Involves a question of meaning when a debate turns to the proper definition of terms.
Decision Rules
Corax
Epanalepsis
Definitional (Stasis)
19. All A are B - all C are B - therefore no A are C
Litotes
Questionable Cause
Hyperbole
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
20. Qualitative significance is part of what stock issue?
(Argument from) Narrative
Ill
Tisias
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
21. Common practice and traditional wisdom fallacies are categories of _____
Hasty Generalization
Tools of Refutation
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Tu Quoque
22. A metaphor that gives attributes to a nonhuman thing
Personification
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Attitudinal (inherency)
Turn
23. Structural inherency and attitudinal inherency are part of what stock issue?
Exergasia
Blame
Term I/Term II
(Argument from) Testimony
24. Values what is concrete rather than what is merely possible
Small Sample
Sign
Locus of Existence
Parallelism
25. Opposite of Epanalepsis
Direct Refutation
Informal Debate
Anadiplosis
Unequivocal
26. After this - therefore on account of this
Litotes
Categorical (Syllogism)
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Checking for Sign argument
27. The inference reasons from meaning or lesson of a story to a claim. The warrant usually says 'The moral to a story tells us a greater truth'
(Argument from) Narrative
Second (or) Third
Turn
Special Topoi
28. Repetition of the same word or groups of words at the beginning of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
Personification
Anaphora
Division
Ethos
29. All A are B -X is A - therefore - X is B OR All A are B - all B are C - therefore - all A are C OR All A are B - all C are A - therefore - all C are B
Begging the Question
Appeal to Authority
Questionable Cause
Categorical (Syllogism)
30. A metaphor with a vehicle that draws upon experience that is specific to a particular culture
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Tools of Refutation
Modus Tollens
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
31. Indicating that something (the claim) is or is not. Is an argument from _____ ? (not a stasis point)
Sign
Deductive Reasoning
Term I/Term II
Claim
32. An implicit comparison made by referring to one thing as another
Modus Ponens
Metaphor
Composition
Cliche
33. Using information from mercenary scientists is committing what fallacy?
Appeal to Authority
Charisma
Tu Quoque
Checking for Sign argument
34. _____ said that concerning all things - there are two contradictory arguments that exist in opposition to one another.
Ambiguity
Protagoras
Stasis
Epanalepsis
35. When more than one vehicle is used for the same tenor - and those vehicles appear in close proximity to each other
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Loci of the Preferable
Mixed Metaphor
Decorum
36. Most fallacies are ____ ____; that is if the argument were to employ difference evidence - or be offered in different circumstances - it would be perfectly fine - but in the specific case in which it is identified as a fallacy - it is flawed
Situationally flawed
Refutation
Cost
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
37. Arguing that the conclusion of an argument must be untrue because there is a fallacy in the reasoning. (Just because the premises may not be true - does not mean that the conclusion has to be false)
Loci of the Preferable
Blame
Tokenism
Fallacy Fallacy
38. An explicit metaphor that overtly compares two things - often using the words 'like' or 'as'
Correctio
Quantitative (significance)
Small Sample
Simile
39. Relative advantages and disadvantages of the new policy. Are the adverse effects going to outweigh the benefits?
Composition
Blame
Tu Quoque
Cost
40. Assuming as a premise some form of the very point that is at issue - the very conclusion we intend to prove. Also called circular reasoning.
Analogy
Valid
Formal Logic
Begging the Question
41. Literally - 'wise one' ; taught rhetoric to citizenry
Sophist
Red Herring
Value-Oriented Arguments
Stock Issues
42. What order do definitional and qualitative stasis usually fall into when put into an argument?
Second
Narrative
Intelligence
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
43. Based on the setting - which dictates the ____ ____ used to determine who has won the debate - E.g. Academic Policy Debate: stock issues Criminal Court Case: beyond a reasonable doubt Civil Courtroom: preponderance of evidence This Classroom: were yo
Procedural (Stasis)
Definitional (Stasis)
Decision Rules
Qualitative (Stasis)
44. Does the moral really follow from the story? Is the narrative plausible and coherent? Are the characterizations consistent?
Checking for Narrative argument
Correctio
Direct Refutation
Epanalepsis
45. Honesty - Dedication - Courage (What part of Ethos)
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
Good Moral Character
Unequivocal
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
46. Circular Reasoning
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
(Special Topoi for) Republicans
Begging the Question
47. Ask a rhetorical question
Attitudinal (inherency)
Narrative
Erotema
False Dichotomy
48. Is a variety of questionable cause; it is when you conclude that something cause dsomething else just because the second thing came after it; literally translated as 'after this - therefore on account of this'
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Modus Ponens
Division
Agree on Commonality then refute
49. The process of discrediting someone's argument by revealing weaknesses in it or presenting a counterargument
Refutation
Grounds (or data)
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Direct Refutation
50. Incorrectly assuming that what is true of the parts is true of the whole
Appeal to Ignorance
Warrant
Metaphor
Composition