SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. What kind of commonplaces 'deflect reality'
Procedural (Stasis)
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Refutation Strategies
Presumption
2. Most fallacies are ____ ____; that is if the argument were to employ difference evidence - or be offered in different circumstances - it would be perfectly fine - but in the specific case in which it is identified as a fallacy - it is flawed
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Parallelism
Situationally flawed
Straw Person
3. Understatement
Claim
Second
Tokenism
Litotes
4. The inference reasons that what a trustworthy source says is true. The warrant to this argument usually says - 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true'
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
(Argument of ) General probability
(Argument from) Testimony
Cure
5. Accepting an argument that you should believe something is true just because the majority believes it is true.
Parallelism
Testimony
Categorical (Syllogism)
Ad Populum
6. Four categories of the Loci of the Preferable
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Euphimism
Checking for Cause argement
7. Repetition of the endings of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Ad Hominem
Epistrophe
Tisias
8. Is a variety of Hasty Generalization; it is when you draw conclusions about a population on the basis of a sample that is too small to be a reliable measure of that population
Small Sample
Unequivocal
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Good Will (Ethos)
9. An argument that follows proper logical form
Intelligence
Mixed Metaphor
Valid
Analogy
10. Religious liberty - limited government - entrepreneurship - military strength - traditional institutions - property rights
Begging the Question
Correctio
(Special Topoi for) Republicans
Stasis
11. Letters to the editor - group discussions - talk show
Informal Debate
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
Checking for Narrative argument
Erotema
12. Appeals from the character of the speaker
Stasis
Ethos
(Argument by) Example
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
13. The process of discrediting someone's argument by revealing weaknesses in it or presenting a counterargument
Ill
Rhetoric
Refutation
Good Moral Character
14. Is a variation of Appeal to Ignorance. It is when you accept an argument that the presumption lies with one side and the other side has the burden of proving its case when the reverse is actually true
Attitudinal (inherency)
Isocrates
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Emotionally Charged (Language)
15. All A are B - all C are B - therefore all A are C
Ambiguity
Mercenary Scientists
Deductive Reasoning
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
16. Opposite of Epistrophe
Epanalepsis
Anaphora
Structural (inherency)
Special Topoi
17. Taking the absence of evidence against something as justification for believing that thing is true.
Appeal to Ignorance
Stock Issues
Rhetoric
Conjectural (Stasis)
18. Repetition of the same word or groups of words at the beginning of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
Isocrates
Epanalepsis
First
Anaphora
19. A manufactured controversy that is motivated by profit or extreme ideology to intentionally create confusion in the public about an issue of scientific fact that is not in dispute by the scientific community. Used to stop debate at the conjectural le
Manufactroversy
Unrepresentative Sample
(Argument by) Analogy
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
20. Opposite of Anaphora
Checking for Sign argument
(Argument by) Example
Mercenary Scientists
Epistrophe
21. Ill - Blame - Cure - Cost
Litotes
Tu Quoque
Arguments
Stock Issues
22. Opposite of Epanalepsis
Begging the Question
Good Moral Character
Anadiplosis
Division
23. Is another variation of the tu quoque; it is when you justify a wrong by saying that this is the way things have always been done
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Testimony
Value Hierarchies
Decision Rules
24. Ending repeated
Litotes
Epistrophe
Checking for Testimony argument
Informal Debate
25. _____ said that concerning all things - there are two contradictory arguments that exist in opposition to one another.
Protagoras
Ethos
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Litotes
26. Faling to bring relevant evidence to bear on an argument
Charisma
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Manufactroversy
Rhetoric
27. Shifting the buren of proof is a category of ____ __ _____
Metaphor
Epistrophe
Appeal to Ignorance
Qualitative (Stasis)
28. _____ thought that the most worthy study is one that advances the student's ability to speak and deliberate on affairs of the state.
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Isocrates
(Argument from) Sign
Checking for Testimony argument
29. If A then B Not A Therefore not B
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Good Will (Ethos)
Anaphora
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
30. Deliberate correction
Unequivocal
Categorical (Syllogism)
Correctio
Fallacy Fallacy
31. An argument with true premises and valid form
Hyperbole
Sound
Epistrophe
Begging the Question
32. The inference moves from specific to general or from general to specific. The warrant to this argument usually reads 'what is true in this case is true in general' or 'what is true in general is true in this case'
(Argument by) Example
Plato
Example
Fallacy Fallacy
33. Draws a conclusion about an entire entity based on knowledge about all of its parts
Checking for Sign argument
Composition
Epanalepsis
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
34. If A then B B Therefore - A
Charisma
False Dichotomy
(Argument from) Sign
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
35. If A then B A Therefore B
Modus Ponens
Checking for Analogy argument
Second
Stock Issues
36. What places do procedural stasis usually occupy in an argument?
Burden of proof
Epistrophe
Second (or) Third
Second
37. Arguing without evidence that a given event is the first of a series of steps that will inevitably lead to some outcome.
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Appeal to Authority
(Argument from) Testimony
38. Associated words or ideas with a vehicle or tenor
Commonplaces
Mercenary Scientists
Blame
Decision Rules
39. Beginning repeated
Procedural (Stasis)
Unequivocal
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
Anaphora
40. All A are B -X is A - therefore - X is B OR All A are B - all B are C - therefore - all A are C OR All A are B - all C are A - therefore - all C are B
Anadiplosis
Formal Logic
(Argument from) Cause
Categorical (Syllogism)
41. Qualitative significance is part of what stock issue?
Charisma
Ill
(Argument from) Testimony
Informal Debate
42. Is a variation of the tu quoque; it is when you justify a wrong by saying that most other people do it too.
(Argument by) Example
Good Moral Character
Common Practice (Fallacy)
Anadiplosis
43. Is a variety of questionable cause; it is when you conclude that something cause dsomething else just because the second thing came after it; literally translated as 'after this - therefore on account of this'
(Argument from) Cause
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Refutation Potential
Valid
44. Providing a response to each reason that an opponent gives
Direct Refutation
Rhetoric
Ill
Aristotle
45. Does the argument effectively appeal to audience values and priorities? Does the argument accurately capture the values at play in this situation?
Conceding Arguments
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Erotema
Blame
46. What order do definitional and qualitative stasis usually fall into when put into an argument?
(Fallacy of) Accident
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Second
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
47. This is the name for fallacies that do not have another name but that involve a claim that does not follow from the premises (e.g. the evidence is not relevant or not appropriate to support the claim). Litterally translated as 'it does not follow -'
First
Litotes
Non Sequitur
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
48. Obligation of the arguer advocating change to overcome the presumption through argument
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Burden of proof
Deductive Reasoning
Claim
49. Affirming or denying a point strongly by asking it as a question; also called a 'rhetorical question'
Erotema
(Argument of ) General probability
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Attitudinal (inherency)
50. beginning repeated at ending
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Epanalepsis
Informal Debate
Hasty Generalization