SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Set two things in opposition
Situationally flawed
Antithesis
Definitional (Stasis)
(Special Topoi for) Science
2. Asks - 'is it?' Involves a question of fact (past - present - future)
Accident
Conjectural (Stasis)
Questionable Cause
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
3. Accepting an argument by example that reasons from specific to general on the basis of relevant but insufficient information or evidence.
Hasty Generalization
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Accident
Unsound
4. Part of blame stock issue - the composition of the policy is flawed
Hasty Generalization
Aristotle
Structural (inherency)
Epistrophe
5. Letters to the editor - group discussions - talk show
Blame
Categorical (Syllogism)
Conceding Arguments
Informal Debate
6. What order do definitional and qualitative stasis usually fall into when put into an argument?
Testimony
Second
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Locus of Existence
7. Ending repeated
Modus Tollens
Tisias
Epistrophe
Checking for Testimony argument
8. Show that an opponent's argument actually supports your side of the debate (often accompanied by a flip in values)
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
Erotema
Turn
Non Sequitur
9. The inference reasons from meaning or lesson of a story to a claim. The warrant usually says 'The moral to a story tells us a greater truth'
Consistency
Checking for Analogy argument
(Argument from) Narrative
Tu Quoque
10. Repetition of the endings of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
Tu Quoque
Burden of proof
Ethos
Epistrophe
11. Are there enough examples to prove that point? Are the examples skewed toward one type of thing? Are the examples unambiguous? Could it be that the connection of general and specific doesn't hold in this case?
Ad Hominem
Unrepresentative Sample
Checking for Example argument
Burden of proof
12. Exaggeration
Anadiplosis
Hyperbole
Aristotle
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
13. Metaphors use ____ and ____
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
(Argument from) Sign
Modus Tollens
Vehicle (and) Tenor
14. Use of a word or phrase that could have several meanings
Ad Populum
Mercenary Scientists
Personification
Ambiguity
15. _____ rejected rhetoric as flattery - not truth - a 'knack' on par with 'cookery' and 'cosmetics'
(Argument from) Sign
Turn
Plato
Protagoras
16. If A then B Not A Therefore not B
Status
Ambiguity
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
Unrepresentative Sample
17. All A are B - all C are B - therefore all A are C
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Refutation Potential
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Definitional (Stasis)
18. _____ thought that rhetoric is the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion
Unrepresentative Sample
Aristotle
Red Herring
Anadiplosis
19. Grounds ---> Claim | Warrant
Structural (inherency)
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Ad Populum
Toulmin Model
20. They stablish an arena for argumentation by defining ground for a dispute and issues of controversy. Typically - one side affirms the resolution and one side negates the resolution.
Begging the Question
Debate Resolutions
Unequivocal
Conceding Arguments
21. Have both claims - reason - and at least two sides
Argument
(Argument from) Sign
Arguments
Narrative
22. Opposite of Hyperbole
Stasis
Blame
Litotes
Cure
23. 'If two things are alike in most respects - they will be alike in this respect too' Warrant for what arg?
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
Metaphor
Composition
Analogy
24. Is another variety of Hasty Generalization. It is when you reason from a sample that is not representative (typical) of the population from which it was drawn.
Value-Oriented Arguments
Value Hierarchies
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Unrepresentative Sample
25. An explicit metaphor that overtly compares two things - often using the words 'like' or 'as'
Modus Tollens
Simile
Hasty Generalization
Questionable Analogy
26. The system for classifying disassociated terms (visually)
(Argument from) Cause
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Value Hierarchies
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
27. Draws a conclusions about ONE MEMBER of a GROUP based on a general rule about all members
(Fallacy of) Accident
Accident
Attitudinal (inherency)
Shifting the Burden of Proof
28. Are there associated commonplaces for this metaphor that can be turned against the arguer?
Refutation Potential
Red Herring
Blame
Exergasia
29. Values what is at the core or essence of a group (or class) rather than what is at the margins
Categorical (Syllogism)
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Division
Locus of Essence
30. If A then B If B then C Therefore - if A then C
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Formal Logic
(Argument by) Example
Prolepsis
31. Beginning repeated
Narrative
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Sound
Anaphora
32. Leaving no doubt - unambiguous
Unequivocal
(Argument from) Sign
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Value-Oriented Arguments
33. Juxtaposition of contrasting words or ideas
Antithesis
Second
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Sign
34. The requirement that the opposition responds reasonably to all significant issues presented by the advocate of change.
Common Practice (Fallacy)
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Burden of Rejoinder
Litotes
35. A manufactured controversy that is motivated by profit or extreme ideology to intentionally create confusion in the public about an issue of scientific fact that is not in dispute by the scientific community. Used to stop debate at the conjectural le
Attitudinal (inherency)
Manufactroversy
Simile
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
36. _______ in ancient Greece spurred the need for the use of rhetoric in everyday life.
Rhetoric
Popular Democracy
Associated Commonplaces
Epistrophe
37. Focuses on inadequacies or problems in the status quo - must be significant if a change is to be made. Must Have: 1. Quantitative significance: affects lots of people 2. Qualitative significance: is of bad quality
Refutation
Metaphor
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Ill
38. The inference moves from specific to general or from general to specific. The warrant to this argument usually reads 'what is true in this case is true in general' or 'what is true in general is true in this case'
Protagoras
Plato
Cliche
(Argument by) Example
39. _____ thought that the most worthy study is one that advances the student's ability to speak and deliberate on affairs of the state.
Epanalepsis
Isocrates
Accident
Manufactroversy
40. Arguing that one thing caused another without sufficient evidence of a causal relationship.
Unsound
(Argument from) Testimony
Questionable Cause
Second (or) Third
41. Four categories of the Loci of the Preferable
Anadiplosis
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Hyperbole
42. Knowledge - Experience - Prudence (What part of Ethos)
Rhetoric
Checking for Testimony argument
Refutation Strategies
Intelligence
43. 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true' is a warrant for what arg?
Division
Appeal to Ignorance
Claim
Testimony
44. 'X is an sign of Y' is what arg's warrant?
Sign
Toulmin Model
Debate Resolutions
Refutation Potential
45. Accepting an argument that you should believe something is true just because the majority believes it is true.
Appeal to Ignorance
Modus Tollens
Second
Ad Populum
46. If A then B B Therefore - A
(Fallacy of) Accident
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Burden of Rejoinder
(Argument from) Narrative
47. Is a variation of Appeal to Ignorance. It is when you accept an argument that the presumption lies with one side and the other side has the burden of proving its case when the reverse is actually true
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Anadiplosis
Euphimism
Mixed Metaphor
48. Defending something by pointing out that your opponent did it as well. Also called 'two wrongs make a right'; this is literally translated as 'thou also'
Sign
Tu Quoque
Enthymeme
Shifting the Burden of Proof
49. Using information from mercenary scientists is committing what fallacy?
Appeal to Authority
Anaphora
Categorical (Syllogism)
Checking for Narrative argument
50. Anticipatory refutation - in which you preempt an opposition argument before it is even offered.
Anadiplosis
Quantitative (significance)
Prolepsis
Epistrophe