SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Uses emotional appeal instead of evidence to argue
Common Practice (Fallacy)
Tokenism
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Equivocation
2. All A are B - all C are B - therefore all A are C
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Epanalepsis
Direct Refutation
Questionable Cause
3. Arguments that are flawed (not from formal logic)
Hyperbole
Questionable Analogy
Fallacies
Modus Ponens
4. Personal charm - sex appeal - leadership qualities (Ethos)
Refutation Potential
Rhetoric
Charisma
Epistrophe
5. Is the metaphor appropriate? The key to ____ is matching strategy to situation.
Decorum
Refutation Strategies
Locus of Essence
Agree on Commonality then refute
6. Qualitative significance is part of what stock issue?
Agree on Commonality then refute
Valid
Ill
Equivocation
7. Use of a word or phrase that could have several meanings
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Begging the Question
Agree on Commonality then refute
Ambiguity
8. Arguing that one thing caused another without sufficient evidence of a causal relationship.
Ambiguity
First
(Argument from) Testimony
Questionable Cause
9. Is a variation of Appeal to Ignorance. It is when you accept an argument that the presumption lies with one side and the other side has the burden of proving its case when the reverse is actually true
Anaphora
Simile
Situationally flawed
Shifting the Burden of Proof
10. Ill - Blame - Cure - Cost
(Argument by) Analogy
False Dichotomy
Anadiplosis
Stock Issues
11. Oppostite of Litotes
Valid
Hyperbole
Questionable Cause
Informal Debate
12. Relative advantages and disadvantages of the new policy. Are the adverse effects going to outweigh the benefits?
Term I/Term II
Cost
Mixed Metaphor
Valid
13. The proposition or conclusion that the arguer is advancing
Anaphora
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Claim
Epistrophe
14. Structural inherency and attitudinal inherency are part of what stock issue?
Blame
Simile
Associated Commonplaces
(Special Topoi for) Republicans
15. Puritan morality - change and progress - equality of opportunity - rejection of authority - achievement and success
Epanalepsis
Attitudinal (inherency)
Correctio
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
16. Draws a conclusions about ONE MEMBER of a GROUP based on a general rule about all members
(Argument from) Sign
Accident
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Narrative
17. Ammending a term or phrase you have just read
Litotes
Correctio
Checking for Sign argument
Anadiplosis
18. Originality - explanatory power - quantitative precision - simplicity - scope
(Special Topoi for) Science
Anadiplosis
Warrant
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
19. Providing a response to each reason that an opponent gives
Direct Refutation
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Good Will (Ethos)
Division
20. These are commonplaces for argument drawn from the specific set of values shared by a particular community of experience and interest
Special Topoi
Associated Commonplaces
(Argument from) Cause
Refutation Strategies
21. The belief that current thinking - attitudes - values - and actions will continue in the absence of good arguments for their change
Correctio
Presumption
Sophist
Mercenary Scientists
22. Circular Reasoning
Consistency
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Begging the Question
Unsound
23. If A then B Not B Therefore not A
Modus Tollens
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
Appeal to Authority
Refutation Strategies
24. What vehicles and tenors share
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
(Argument of ) General probability
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Associated Commonplaces
25. Special Topoi and Loci of the Preferable - what kind of args?
Term I/Term II
Value-Oriented Arguments
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
Locus of Essence
26. Focuses on inadequacies or problems in the status quo - must be significant if a change is to be made. Must Have: 1. Quantitative significance: affects lots of people 2. Qualitative significance: is of bad quality
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Ill
Turn
Decision Rules
27. After this - therefore on account of this
Equivocation
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Ethos
(Fallacy of) Accident
28. An argument that follows proper logical form
Syllogism
Valid
Checking for Narrative argument
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
29. It does not follow - Red Herring belongs to this category
Checking for Analogy argument
(Special Topoi for) Science
Non Sequitur
Formal Debate
30. Letters to the editor - group discussions - talk show
Sign
Sophist
Informal Debate
(Argument from) Cause
31. Professional Standing - Fame (Ethos)
Accident
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Litotes
Status
32. Inference that allows you to move from grounds to claim (often implied in the argument)
Locus of Quality
Warrant
Qualitative (Stasis)
Parallelism
33. A syllogism suppressing the Major Premise - and only contains a Minor Premise and the Conclusion. People speak in these more often than syllogisms.
Enthymeme
Prolepsis
Unrepresentative Sample
Plato
34. Asks - 'is it?' Involves a question of fact (past - present - future)
Popular Democracy
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
(Argument from) Narrative
Conjectural (Stasis)
35. Good Moral Character
Non Sequitur
Modus Ponens
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Stasis
36. What places do procedural stasis usually occupy in an argument?
Second (or) Third
Refutation Potential
Grounds (or data)
Epistrophe
37. Who developed the argument from general probability?
Corax
Ill
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
Analogy
38. Does the moral really follow from the story? Is the narrative plausible and coherent? Are the characterizations consistent?
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Ad Populum
Epistrophe
Checking for Narrative argument
39. Arguing without evidence that a given event is the first of a series of steps that will inevitably lead to some outcome.
Exergasia
Antithesis
Sophist
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
40. Is a variety of Hasty Generalization; it is when you draw conclusions about a population on the basis of a sample that is too small to be a reliable measure of that population
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Small Sample
Ad Hominem
41. Structure repeated
Appeal to Ignorance
Valid
Refutation
Parallelism
42. Part of the blame stock issue - the acceptance or obedience to the policy or law makes it ineffective
Sign
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Attitudinal (inherency)
43. Opposite of anadiplosis
Cure
Epanalepsis
Modus Ponens
Exergasia
44. Whitewashes the effect of your topic to downplay it; less emotional than appropriate
Cost
Parallelism
Euphimism
Modus Ponens
45. Agree with the values or goals of the opposition - but then argue that the opposition doesn't do a better job of achieving those values goals
Rhetoric
Straw Person
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Agree on Commonality then refute
46. Opposite of Anaphora
Anaphora
Epistrophe
(Argument from) Sign
Correctio
47. 'If two things are alike in most respects - they will be alike in this respect too' Warrant for what arg?
Sound
Litotes
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
Analogy
48. Is necessary to defend the weak against the strong - Is useful and necessary to the state and the individual because you become a more thoughtful citizen and a more well-rounded person - Is useful to have the tools to recognize good arguments and def
Appeal to Authority
Isocrates
Rhetoric
Straw Person
49. Leaving no doubt - unambiguous
Mixed Metaphor
Parallelism
Unequivocal
Incrementum
50. Have both claims - reason - and at least two sides
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Fallacies
Second
Arguments