SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. After this - therefore on account of this
Stock Issues
Value-Oriented Arguments
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
2. Associated words or ideas with a vehicle or tenor
Commonplaces
Appeal to Authority
Hyperbole
Appeal to Ignorance
3. When more than one vehicle is used for the same tenor - and those vehicles appear in close proximity to each other
(Argument of ) General probability
Grounds (or data)
Mixed Metaphor
Tisias
4. Is a variety of Hasty Generalization; it is when you draw conclusions about a population on the basis of a sample that is too small to be a reliable measure of that population
Rhetoric
Small Sample
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Locus of Essence
5. Letters to the editor - group discussions - talk show
Informal Debate
Decorum
Division
Testimony
6. Use of a word or phrase that could have several meanings
Status
Direct Refutation
Quantitative (significance)
Ambiguity
7. These seats or commonplaces of argument suggest inferences that arguers might make that are based on the habits of thought and value hierarchies that everyone shares
(Argument from) Narrative
Term I/Term II
Value-Oriented Arguments
Loci of the Preferable
8. Focuses on inadequacies or problems in the status quo - must be significant if a change is to be made. Must Have: 1. Quantitative significance: affects lots of people 2. Qualitative significance: is of bad quality
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Turn
Ill
Presumption
9. Originality - explanatory power - quantitative precision - simplicity - scope
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Direct Refutation
Blame
(Special Topoi for) Science
10. The process of discrediting someone's argument by revealing weaknesses in it or presenting a counterargument
Modus Tollens
Rhetoric
Refutation
Arguments
11. Whitewashes the effect of your topic to downplay it; less emotional than appropriate
Metaphor
(Fallacy of) Accident
Stock Issues
Euphimism
12. Uses emotional appeal instead of evidence to argue
Small Sample
Deductive Reasoning
Narrative
Emotionally Charged (Language)
13. The proposition or conclusion that the arguer is advancing
Epistrophe
Conceding Arguments
False Dichotomy
Claim
14. If A then B B Therefore - A
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Appeal to Authority
Division
Popular Democracy
15. Obligation of the arguer advocating change to overcome the presumption through argument
Refutation
Burden of proof
Attitudinal (inherency)
(Special Topoi for) Republicans
16. Arguing without evidence that a given event is the first of a series of steps that will inevitably lead to some outcome.
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Simile
Correctio
Ill
17. A metaphor with a vehicle that draws upon experience that is specific to a particular culture
Refutation Potential
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Ad Hominem
False Dichotomy
18. Four categories of the Loci of the Preferable
(Argument by) Analogy
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Hyperbole
Tu Quoque
19. Metaphors use ____ and ____
Debate Resolutions
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Structural (inherency)
Vehicle (and) Tenor
20. 'What is true in this case is true in general' or 'What is true in general is true in this case' Is a warrant for what kind of argument?
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
Rhetoric
Example
Exergasia
21. Are the two things really alike - or are there significant differences that might make them unalike in this respect? Are the negative consequences to comparing these two things? Is the analogy clear or confusing?
Checking for Analogy argument
Burden of Rejoinder
Term I/Term II
Structural (inherency)
22. Accepting an argument by example that reasons from specific to general on the basis of relevant but insufficient information or evidence.
Accident
Ad Hominem
Categorical (Syllogism)
Hasty Generalization
23. Ending repeated
Warrant
Epistrophe
Status
Epanalepsis
24. An argument that follows proper logical form
Aristotle
Valid
Correctio
Litotes
25. Circular Reasoning
Begging the Question
Informal Debate
Structural (inherency)
Straw Person
26. Opposite of Hyperbole
Hyperbole
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Litotes
27. Opposite of anadiplosis
Epanalepsis
Anaphora
(Argument from) Testimony
Mixed Metaphor
28. Did not pay Corax for sophistry lessons and was taken to court
Second
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
Tisias
Emotionally Charged (Language)
29. Are there enough examples to prove that point? Are the examples skewed toward one type of thing? Are the examples unambiguous? Could it be that the connection of general and specific doesn't hold in this case?
Litotes
Formal Logic
Checking for Example argument
Isocrates
30. Honesty - Dedication - Courage (What part of Ethos)
Presumption
Correctio
Good Moral Character
Checking for Analogy argument
31. Good Moral Character
Correctio
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Composition
Metaphor
32. Taking one idea and dividing it into two parts - disengaging the two resulting ideas - giving a positive value to one (Term II) and a lesser or negative value to the other (Term I). These are often based on the appearance/reality pair.
Begging the Question
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
Disassociation of Concepts
Metaphor
33. Faling to bring relevant evidence to bear on an argument
Unsound
Euphimism
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
34. Attempts to assign responsibility for the existence of the ill to the current system. Needs to connect the ill to the policy in order for it to be changed. Must Have: 1. Structural Inherency: bad structure/lack of structure 2. Attitudinal Inherency:
Refutation
Argument
Blame
Second
35. Values more over less in terms of quantitative outcomes (the greatest good for the greatest number)
(Argument by) Example
Locus of Quantity
Erotema
Definitional (Stasis)
36. _____ rejected rhetoric as flattery - not truth - a 'knack' on par with 'cookery' and 'cosmetics'
Epistrophe
Stasis
Plato
Gorgias
37. _____ thought that the most worthy study is one that advances the student's ability to speak and deliberate on affairs of the state.
Anadiplosis
Locus of Existence
Isocrates
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
38. Is another variation of the tu quoque; it is when you justify a wrong by saying that this is the way things have always been done
Anadiplosis
Epanalepsis
Toulmin Model
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
39. Is another variety of Hasty Generalization. It is when you reason from a sample that is not representative (typical) of the population from which it was drawn.
Checking for Narrative argument
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Epistrophe
Unrepresentative Sample
40. If A then B If B then C Therefore - if A then C
Warrant
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Modus Ponens
41. Wrote 'On Not Being' and 'In Defense of Helen'
Appeal to Ignorance
Gorgias
Agree on Commonality then refute
Rhetoric
42. Draws a conclusions about ONE MEMBER of a GROUP based on a general rule about all members
Accident
(Argument from) Narrative
Common Practice (Fallacy)
Burden of proof
43. An implicit comparison made by referring to one thing as another
Metaphor
Refutation
Valid
(Fallacy of) Accident
44. Drawing an analogical conclusion when the cases compared are not relevantly alike
Anadiplosis
Quantitative (significance)
Agree on Commonality then refute
Questionable Analogy
45. All A are B - all C are B - therefore all A are C
Popular Democracy
Value Hierarchies
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Exergasia
46. ______ are hired to create manufactroversy
Mercenary Scientists
Direct Refutation
Burden of Rejoinder
Checking for Testimony argument
47. Puritan morality - change and progress - equality of opportunity - rejection of authority - achievement and success
Decision Rules
Checking for Sign argument
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
Straw Person
48. Draws a conclusion about an entire entity based on knowledge about all of its parts
Composition
Incrementum
(Argument from) Narrative
Anaphora
49. All A are B -no B are C - therefore - no A are C
Red Herring
Categorical (Syllogism)
Claim
Tisias
50. Repetition of the ending of one clause or sentence at the beginning of another.
(Argument from) Sign
Anadiplosis
Hyperbole
Manufactroversy