SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Specific evidence or reason to support the claim (often introduced with the words 'because' or 'since')
Formal Logic
Grounds (or data)
(Evaluation Criteria for) Value-Oriented Arguments
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
2. Ask a rhetorical question
Aristotle
Refutation Potential
Valid
Erotema
3. The inference reasons from meaning or lesson of a story to a claim. The warrant usually says 'The moral to a story tells us a greater truth'
Ethos
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
(Fallacy of) Accident
(Argument from) Narrative
4. If A then B Not A Therefore not B
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Quantitative (significance)
Good Will (Ethos)
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
5. Are there associated commonplaces for this metaphor that can be turned against the arguer?
Fallacy Fallacy
Refutation Potential
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
Hyperbole
6. If A then B If B then C Therefore - if A then C
Checking for Cause argement
Popular Democracy
Presumption
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
7. Most fallacies are ____ ____; that is if the argument were to employ difference evidence - or be offered in different circumstances - it would be perfectly fine - but in the specific case in which it is identified as a fallacy - it is flawed
Situationally flawed
Syllogism
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Hasty Generalization
8. Circular Reasoning
Fallacy Fallacy
Begging the Question
Tu Quoque
Anadiplosis
9. A syllogism suppressing the Major Premise - and only contains a Minor Premise and the Conclusion. People speak in these more often than syllogisms.
Refutation Strategies
Rhetoric
Enthymeme
(Argument from) Narrative
10. It does not follow - Red Herring belongs to this category
Non Sequitur
(Argument of ) General probability
Litotes
Shifting the Burden of Proof
11. Asks - 'of what kind is it?' Involves a question of the quality of the act - whether it is good or bad.
Epanalepsis
Qualitative (Stasis)
Deductive Reasoning
Burden of proof
12. Is the metaphor overused - heard so many times that it becomes tedious rather than persuasive?
Antithesis
Cliche
Syllogism
Erotema
13. Involves a large number of people; from Ill stock issue - Produces a large amount of harm; from Ill stock issue
Quantitative (significance)
Emotionally Charged (Language)
Plato
Locus of Quality
14. A or B Not A Therefore - B
Rhetoric
Locus of Existence
Disjunctive (Syllogism)
Hyperbole
15. Is necessary to defend the weak against the strong - Is useful and necessary to the state and the individual because you become a more thoughtful citizen and a more well-rounded person - Is useful to have the tools to recognize good arguments and def
Structural (inherency)
Rhetoric
Tools of Refutation
Straw Person
16. Four categories of the Loci of the Preferable
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
Conceding Arguments
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
17. All A are B - all C are B - therefore no A are C
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
(Argument from) Narrative
Example
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
18. They stablish an arena for argumentation by defining ground for a dispute and issues of controversy. Typically - one side affirms the resolution and one side negates the resolution.
(Argument by) Analogy
Debate Resolutions
Charisma
Straw Person
19. 'What is true in this case is true in general' or 'What is true in general is true in this case' Is a warrant for what kind of argument?
(at the) Corax (and) Tisias trial
Example
Refutation Strategies
(Special Topoi for) Science
20. Metaphors use ____ and ____
Formal Logic
Vehicle (and) Tenor
Hyperbole
Epanalepsis
21. What vehicles and tenors share
Categorical (Syllogism)
Accident
Associated Commonplaces
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
22. Accepting a token gesture for something more substantive
Tokenism
Value Hierarchies
Gorgias
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
23. _____ rejected rhetoric as flattery - not truth - a 'knack' on par with 'cookery' and 'cosmetics'
Associated Commonplaces
Appeal to Ignorance
Plato
Common Practice (Fallacy)
24. 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true' is a warrant for what arg?
Epanalepsis
Checking for Testimony argument
Testimony
Litotes
25. Is the source qualified to say what is being said? Is she or he in a position to know this information? Does the testimony represent what the authority really meant to say? Is the source relatively unbiased and recent?
Erotema
Isocrates
Epistrophe
Checking for Testimony argument
26. Ending repeated
Epistrophe
Anadiplosis
Correctio
Good Will (Ethos)
27. Does one thing really cause the other - or are they merely correlated? Is there another larger cause or series of causes that better explains the effect?
Checking for Cause argement
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Red Herring
28. A metaphor that gives attributes to a nonhuman thing
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
Personification
Metaphor
Antithesis
29. Accepting the word of an alleged authority when we should not because the person does not have expertise on this particular issue or s/he cannot be trusted to give an unbiased opinion.
Erotema
Appeal to Authority
Antithesis
Refutation Potential
30. Anticipatory refutation - in which you preempt an opposition argument before it is even offered.
(Argument from) Narrative
Prolepsis
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
Erotema
31. Values what is concrete rather than what is merely possible
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Plato
Tisias
Locus of Existence
32. Are the two things really alike - or are there significant differences that might make them unalike in this respect? Are the negative consequences to comparing these two things? Is the analogy clear or confusing?
Fallacies
Checking for Analogy argument
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Antithesis
33. Wrote 'On Not Being' and 'In Defense of Helen'
Locus of Essence
Debate Resolutions
Good Moral Character
Gorgias
34. Common practice and traditional wisdom fallacies are categories of _____
Tu Quoque
Unequivocal
Conceding Arguments
Fallacy Fallacy
35. Fallacious argument from specific to general without sufficient evidence - Draws a conclusion about all the members of a group based on the knowledge of some members
Anaphora
Toulmin Model
Hasty Generalization
Presumption
36. _______ in ancient Greece spurred the need for the use of rhetoric in everyday life.
Personification
Popular Democracy
Locus of Essence
Checking for Testimony argument
37. Affirming or denying a point strongly by asking it as a question; also called a 'rhetorical question'
Conjectural (Stasis)
Erotema
Locus of Quality
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
38. Juxtaposition of contrasting words or ideas
Stock Issues
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Antithesis
Special Topoi
39. Honesty - Dedication - Courage (What part of Ethos)
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Loci of the Preferable
Appeal to Authority
Good Moral Character
40. Using information from mercenary scientists is committing what fallacy?
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Appeal to Authority
Grounds (or data)
Enthymeme
41. Special Topoi and Loci of the Preferable - what kind of args?
Epistrophe
Argument
Value-Oriented Arguments
Begging the Question
42. All A are B -no B are C - therefore - no A are C
Categorical (Syllogism)
Epistrophe
Toulmin Model
Erotema
43. Literally - 'wise one' ; taught rhetoric to citizenry
Cost
Erotema
Sophist
Shifting the Burden of Proof
44. Set two things in opposition
Antithesis
Conjectural (Stasis)
Ill
Modus Tollens
45. The inference compares two similar things - saying that since they are alike in some respects - they are alike in another respect. It can be a figurative analogy or a literal analogy. The warrant usually reads: 'if two things are alike in most respec
(Argument by) Analogy
Syllogism
Hyperbole
Structural (inherency)
46. Religious liberty - limited government - entrepreneurship - military strength - traditional institutions - property rights
Rhetoric
Checking for Sign argument
(Special Topoi for) Republicans
Division
47. When more than one vehicle is used for the same tenor - and those vehicles appear in close proximity to each other
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
Valid
Mixed Metaphor
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
48. 'The moral to a story tells us a greater truth' is a warrant for what arg?
Rhetoric
Epanalepsis
Value Hierarchies
Narrative
49. Associated words or ideas with a vehicle or tenor
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Appeal to Authority
Commonplaces
50. Arguing without evidence that a given event is the first of a series of steps that will inevitably lead to some outcome.
Anaphora
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Parallelism
Litotes