SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The inference reasons that what a trustworthy source says is true. The warrant to this argument usually says - 'When a qualified person says something is true - it's true'
Good Moral Character
(Argument from) Testimony
Arguments
Equivocation
2. Good Moral Character
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Procedural (Stasis)
Division
Structural (inherency)
3. Misrepresenting an opponent's position as more extreme than it really is and then attacking that version - or attacking a weaker opponent while ignoring a stronger one.
Hyperbole
Straw Person
Epanalepsis
Testimony
4. Four categories of the Loci of the Preferable
(Argument by) Analogy
Mercenary Scientists
Quantity Quality Essence Existent
Value-Oriented Arguments
5. Asks - 'what is it?' Involves a question of meaning when a debate turns to the proper definition of terms.
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Equivocation
Hyperbole
Definitional (Stasis)
6. Taking one idea and dividing it into two parts - disengaging the two resulting ideas - giving a positive value to one (Term II) and a lesser or negative value to the other (Term I). These are often based on the appearance/reality pair.
Disassociation of Concepts
Metaphor
Direct Refutation
Claim
7. The inference compares two similar things - saying that since they are alike in some respects - they are alike in another respect. It can be a figurative analogy or a literal analogy. The warrant usually reads: 'if two things are alike in most respec
Appeal to Authority
(Argument from) Sign
Simile
(Argument by) Analogy
8. What is 'at issue' in a controversy; the place where two sides of an argument come into conflict; the clash between arguments.
Tu Quoque
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Litotes
Stasis
9. Oral performances that have a set format in which two or more speakers take turns making arguments and counterarguments before an audience - Examples: Court room - candidate debates - academic debates
Burden of proof
Enthymeme
Formal Debate
Analogy
10. Circular Reasoning
Begging the Question
Checking for Testimony argument
Locus of Quality
Blame
11. Literally - 'wise one' ; taught rhetoric to citizenry
Sophist
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
Cost
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
12. What places do procedural stasis usually occupy in an argument?
Unsound
Euphimism
Second (or) Third
Unequivocal
13. Obligation of the arguer advocating change to overcome the presumption through argument
Consistency
Epanalepsis
Burden of proof
Common Practice (Fallacy)
14. Deliberate correction
Ill
Litotes
Correctio
Sign
15. Is a variety of Hasty Generalization; it is when you draw conclusions about a population on the basis of a sample that is too small to be a reliable measure of that population
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Small Sample
Attitudinal (inherency)
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
16. Anticipatory refutation - in which you preempt an opposition argument before it is even offered.
Division
Prolepsis
Rhetoric
Plato
17. If A then B B Therefore - A
Formal Logic
Begging the Question
(Argument from) Testimony
Affirming the Consequent (INVALID)
18. Professional Standing - Fame (Ethos)
Status
Tokenism
Equivocation
Litotes
19. Agree with the values or goals of the opposition - but then argue that the opposition doesn't do a better job of achieving those values goals
Checking for Testimony argument
Anadiplosis
Narrative
Agree on Commonality then refute
20. Qualitative significance is part of what stock issue?
Red Herring
Ill
Unrepresentative Sample
Direct Refutation
21. Values what is concrete rather than what is merely possible
Unequivocal
Locus of Existence
Tu Quoque
Direct Refutation
22. Ill - Blame - Cure - Cost
Anaphora
Stock Issues
Status
Associated Commonplaces
23. The inference moves from specific to general or from general to specific. The warrant to this argument usually reads 'what is true in this case is true in general' or 'what is true in general is true in this case'
First
Begging the Question
(Argument by) Example
Direct Refutation
24. _____ rejected rhetoric as flattery - not truth - a 'knack' on par with 'cookery' and 'cosmetics'
Checking for Narrative argument
Hyperbole
Plato
Turn
25. Letters to the editor - group discussions - talk show
Informal Debate
Intelligence
Litotes
(Argument from) Sign
26. The inference moves from cause to effect or effect to cause - arguing that something is the direct result of something else. The warrant to this argument is usually formatted as: 'X is a form of Y'
(Argument from) Cause
Corax
Hasty Generalization
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
27. All A are B - all C are B - therefore all A are C
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Appeal to Authority
Associated Commonplaces
Analogy
28. Asks - 'of what kind is it?' Involves a question of the quality of the act - whether it is good or bad.
(Argument from) Sign
Tu Quoque
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Qualitative (Stasis)
29. Metaphors use ____ and ____
(Argument from) Narrative
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Ill
Vehicle (and) Tenor
30. The proposition or conclusion that the arguer is advancing
Claim
Exergasia
Questionable Analogy
Hyperbole
31. Value Hierarchy Visualization
Tu Quoque
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Ill
Term I/Term II
32. Can the sign be found without the thing for which it stands? Is an alternative explanation of the maning of the sign more credible? Are there countering signs that indicate that his one sign is false?
Checking for Sign argument
(Argument by) Example
Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence
Metaphor
33. _______ in ancient Greece spurred the need for the use of rhetoric in everyday life.
Decision Rules
Tokenism
Argument
Popular Democracy
34. Similarity of structure in a pair or series of related words - phrases - or clauses
Anadiplosis
Debate Resolutions
Correctio
Parallelism
35. The system for classifying disassociated terms (visually)
Claim
Small Sample
Ambiguity
Value Hierarchies
36. Common practice and traditional wisdom fallacies are categories of _____
Quantitative (significance)
Tu Quoque
Deductive Reasoning
Analogy
37. 'What is true in this case is true in general' or 'What is true in general is true in this case' Is a warrant for what kind of argument?
Modus Ponens
Anadiplosis
Litotes
Example
38. Incorrectly assuming that what is true of the whole is true of the parts
Locus of Existence
Turn
Cliche
Division
39. Leaving no doubt - unambiguous
Unequivocal
Status
(Argument by) Analogy
Litotes
40. Draws a conclusion about the PARTS of an ENTITY based on knowledge about the whole entity.
Begging the Question
Anadiplosis
Unequivocal
Division
41. ______ are hired to create manufactroversy
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Mercenary Scientists
Burden of Rejoinder
Deductive Reasoning
42. beginning repeated at ending
Qualitative (Stasis)
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Epanalepsis
Isocrates
43. Using a term in an argument in one sense in one place and another sense in another place
Correctio
Formal Logic
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
Equivocation
44. Value Hierarchy Visualization in terms of high and low values (?/?)
Formal Logic
Anadiplosis
Less Valued Term/Higher Valued Term
Consistency
45. Are there associated commonplaces for this metaphor that can be turned against the arguer?
Second
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Refutation Potential
46. This is the name for fallacies that do not have another name but that involve a claim that does not follow from the premises (e.g. the evidence is not relevant or not appropriate to support the claim). Litterally translated as 'it does not follow -'
Metaphor
Hasty Generalization
Claim
Non Sequitur
47. Incorrectly assuming that one choice or another must be made when other choices are available or when no choice must be made
False Dichotomy
Sophist
Non Sequitur
Second
48. Associated words or ideas with a vehicle or tenor
Categorical (Syllogism)
Commonplaces
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
False Charge of Fallacy
49. Involves a large number of people; from Ill stock issue - Produces a large amount of harm; from Ill stock issue
Begging the Question
Shifting the Burden of Proof
Analogy
Quantitative (significance)
50. Grounds ---> Claim | Warrant
Enthymeme
Qualitative (Stasis)
Toulmin Model
Syllogism