SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Public Debating
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
soft-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Can the sign be found without the thing for which it stands? Is an alternative explanation of the maning of the sign more credible? Are there countering signs that indicate that his one sign is false?
Rhetoric
False Charge of Fallacy
Checking for Sign argument
Plato
2. After this - therefore on account of this
Fallacies
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Anaphora
Aristotle
3. Is a variety of questionable cause; it is when you conclude that something cause dsomething else just because the second thing came after it; literally translated as 'after this - therefore on account of this'
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Cicero's Four Stasis Points
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
4. They stablish an arena for argumentation by defining ground for a dispute and issues of controversy. Typically - one side affirms the resolution and one side negates the resolution.
Term I (Disassociation Pair)
(Argument from) Sign
Blame
Debate Resolutions
5. Defending something by pointing out that your opponent did it as well. Also called 'two wrongs make a right'; this is literally translated as 'thou also'
Good Moral Character
Hasty Generalization
Invalid (Categorical Syllogism)
Tu Quoque
6. Does one thing really cause the other - or are they merely correlated? Is there another larger cause or series of causes that better explains the effect?
Post hoc - ergo propter hoc
Narrative
Division
Checking for Cause argement
7. Usually has three parts: 1. (MP) Major Premise - unequivocal statement 2. (mP) Minor Premise - about a specific case 3. (C) Conclusion - follows necessarily from the premises
Exergasia
(Fallacy of) Accident
Epanalepsis
Syllogism
8. 'The moral to a story tells us a greater truth' is a warrant for what arg?
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
Aristotle
Presumption
Narrative
9. Associated words or ideas with a vehicle or tenor
Testimony
Commonplaces
Locus of Existence
Hypothetical (Syllogism)
10. All A are B -no B are C - therefore - no A are C
Correctio
Formal Debate
(Argument from) Sign
Categorical (Syllogism)
11. Accepting the word of an alleged authority when we should not because the person does not have expertise on this particular issue or s/he cannot be trusted to give an unbiased opinion.
Charisma
Term I/Term II
Special Topoi
Appeal to Authority
12. It does not follow - Red Herring belongs to this category
Decision Rules
Isocrates
Non Sequitur
Antithesis
13. Reasoning from case to case
Traditional Wisdom (Fallacy)
False Charge of Fallacy
Analogy
Sound
14. Conjectural - Procedural - Definitional - and Qualitative Points are all ____
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
15. Any logical system that abstracts the form of statements away from their content in order to establish abstract criteria of consistency and validity
Formal Logic
Equivocation
Exergasia
Accident
16. A legitimate generalization is applied to a particular case in an absolute manner
Tu Quoque
Refutation Strategies
(Special Topoi for) Science
(Fallacy of) Accident
17. A field of scholarship devoted to how arguments work
(Argument from) Testimony
Rhetoric
Begging the Question
Formal Debate
18. Fallacious argument from specific to general without sufficient evidence - Draws a conclusion about all the members of a group based on the knowledge of some members
Simile
Hasty Generalization
Checking for Example argument
Correctio
19. Accepting a token gesture for something more substantive
Decorum
Begging the Question
Tokenism
Tools of Refutation
20. Repetition of the same word or groups of words at the beginning of successive clauses - sentences - or lines.
Sign
Quantitative (significance)
Ad Populum
Anaphora
21. These seats or commonplaces of argument suggest inferences that arguers might make that are based on the habits of thought and value hierarchies that everyone shares
Loci of the Preferable
Manufactroversy
Hyperbole
Culturetypal (Metaphor)
22. Is necessary to defend the weak against the strong - Is useful and necessary to the state and the individual because you become a more thoughtful citizen and a more well-rounded person - Is useful to have the tools to recognize good arguments and def
Rhetoric
Division
Antithesis
Consistency
23. Is a variety of Hasty Generalization; it is when you draw conclusions about a population on the basis of a sample that is too small to be a reliable measure of that population
Small Sample
(Argument by) Analogy
Simile
Anadiplosis
24. The inference moves from cause to effect or effect to cause - arguing that something is the direct result of something else. The warrant to this argument is usually formatted as: 'X is a form of Y'
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Gorgias
Hasty Generalization
(Argument from) Cause
25. Opposite of Hyperbole
Slippery Slope (Fallacy)
Litotes
Denying the Antecedent (INVALID)
Correctio
26. Using a term in an argument in one sense in one place and another sense in another place
Tisias
Equivocation
Burden of proof
Hasty Generalization
27. Part of the blame stock issue - the acceptance or obedience to the policy or law makes it ineffective
Composition
Decorum
Cure
Attitudinal (inherency)
28. 'X causes Y' is a warrant for what argument
Honesty - Dedication - Courage
Refutation
Cause 9Arguing that something caused something else)
Unrepresentative Sample
29. Structural inherency and attitudinal inherency are part of what stock issue?
Blame
Epistrophe
Correctio
Qualitative (Stasis)
30. Shifting the buren of proof is a category of ____ __ _____
Epanalepsis
Cure
Ad Hominem
Appeal to Ignorance
31. Honesty - Dedication - Courage (What part of Ethos)
Non Sequitur
Good Moral Character
Composition
Modus Ponens
32. Is the metaphor appropriate? The key to ____ is matching strategy to situation.
Charisma
Modus Tollens
Deductive Reasoning
Decorum
33. Value Hierarchy Visualization
Term I/Term II
Value Hierarchies
Formal Debate
Nonassociated (commonplaces)
34. 'What is true in this case is true in general' or 'What is true in general is true in this case' Is a warrant for what kind of argument?
(Argument from) Cause
Example
Analogy
Associated Commonplaces
35. Does the moral really follow from the story? Is the narrative plausible and coherent? Are the characterizations consistent?
Checking for Narrative argument
(Special Topoi for) American Public Address
Modus Tollens
Appeal to Ignorance
36. Is a variation of the tu quoque; it is when you justify a wrong by saying that most other people do it too.
Common Practice (Fallacy)
Deductive Reasoning
Epanalepsis
Prolepsis
37. Agree with the values or goals of the opposition - but then argue that the opposition doesn't do a better job of achieving those values goals
Second
Epanalepsis
Exergasia
Agree on Commonality then refute
38. Taking one idea and dividing it into two parts - disengaging the two resulting ideas - giving a positive value to one (Term II) and a lesser or negative value to the other (Term I). These are often based on the appearance/reality pair.
Status
Non Sequitur
Litotes
Disassociation of Concepts
39. Exaggeration
Hyperbole
Correctio
Rhetoric
Non Sequitur
40. Obligation of the arguer advocating change to overcome the presumption through argument
Archetypal (Metaphor)
Burden of proof
Litotes
Argument
41. An implicit comparison made by referring to one thing as another
Rhetoric
Hasty Generalization
Turn
Metaphor
42. Accepting an argument by example that reasons from specific to general on the basis of relevant but insufficient information or evidence.
Situationally flawed
Second (or) Third
Hasty Generalization
Qualitative (Stasis)
43. Term with higher (positive) value
Tools of Refutation
Tu Quoque
Locus of Quality
Term II (Disassociation Pair)
44. Letters to the editor - group discussions - talk show
(Argument by) Analogy
Mercenary Scientists
Informal Debate
Simile
45. Indicating that something (the claim) is or is not. Is an argument from _____ ? (not a stasis point)
(Special Topoi for) Democrats
Fallacies
Sign
Checking for Testimony argument
46. Uses emotional appeal instead of evidence to argue
Isocrates
Accident
Charisma
Emotionally Charged (Language)
47. Ideas repeated
(Special Topoi for) Science
Non Sequitur
Exergasia
Rhetoric
48. Religious liberty - limited government - entrepreneurship - military strength - traditional institutions - property rights
Composition
Refutation Strategies
Epistrophe
(Special Topoi for) Republicans
49. Focuses on inadequacies or problems in the status quo - must be significant if a change is to be made. Must Have: 1. Quantitative significance: affects lots of people 2. Qualitative significance: is of bad quality
Tokenism
Tools of Refutation
False Dichotomy
Ill
50. Structure repeated
Locus of Existence
Parallelism
Procedural (Stasis)
Formal Logic