SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
SAT Essay Logical Fallacies
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
sat
,
english
,
writing-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Red herring
Prevalent Proof
Inductive Reasoning
2. Information that can be objectively proven as true
Circular Reasoning
Red herring
Fact
Stereotyping
3. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause
Ad misericordia
Deductive Reasoning
Single cause
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
4. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations
Slippery Slope
Double standard
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Vagueness
5. Appeal based on the credibility of the author
Double standard
Ethos
Correlation as cause
Hasty generalization
6. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence
Special pleading
Values
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
7. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion
Dog whistle
Appeal to the golden mean
Prevalent Proof
Ad populum
8. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue
Numbers
Smoke screen
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Hasty generalization
9. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right
Appeal to the golden mean
Oversimplification
Numbers
Irrelevant Proof
10. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data
Statistic
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Vagueness
Numbers
11. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Values
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Nonsequiter
12. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support
Circular Reasoning
Ad misericordia
Begging the question
Appeal to the golden mean
13. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience
Red herring
Dog whistle
Irrelevant Proof
Ad misericordia
14. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it
Genetic Fallacy
Division
Appeal to the golden mean
Double standard
15. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'
Ad hominem
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Irrelevant Proof
Smoke screen
16. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented
Hasty generalization
Vagueness
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Slippery Slope
17. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'
Slippery Slope
Composition
Special pleading
False scenario
18. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Special pleading
Inductive Reasoning
Slippery slope
19. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence
Circular Reasoning
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Fact
Slippery slope
20. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.
Appeal to the golden mean
Deductive Reasoning
Oversimplification
Prevalent Proof
21. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.
Straw man
Hasty generalization
False scenario
Appeal to Authority
22. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to
Irrelevant Proof
Either-or Reasoning
Division
Stereotyping
23. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue
Special pleading
Red herring
Slippery slope
Ad hominem
24. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course
Numbers
Either-or Reasoning
Logos
Circular Reasoning
25. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts
Correlation as cause
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Nonsequiter
Hasty generalization
26. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase
Begging the question
Logos
Negative Proof
Equivocation
27. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Special pleading
Either -or
Either-or Reasoning
28. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence
Hasty generalization
Dog whistle
Prevalent Proof
Pathos
29. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply
Cause-effect relationships
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Statistic
Hasty generalization
30. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Red herring
Circular Reasoning
Smoke screen
31. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event
Numbers
Cause-effect relationships
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
32. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria
Deductive Reasoning
Appeal to Authority
Double standard
Slippery slope
33. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?
Statistic
Ad misericordia
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Hasty generalization
34. Appeal to reason
Logos
Ad hominem
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Division
35. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Special pleading
Hasty generalization
Oversimplification
36. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern
Division
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Double standard
Anecdote
37. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Vagueness
Hasty generalization
Nonsequiter
38. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other
Correlation as cause
Ad misericordia
False authority
Stereotyping
39. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.
Begging the question
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Composition
Prevalent Proof
40. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent
False analogy
Cause-effect relationships
Genetic Fallacy
Oversimplification
41. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.
Ad hominem
Dog whistle
Slippery slope
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
42. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'
Ad misericordia
Pathos
Statistic
Undistributed Middle
43. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue
False analogy
Red Herring
Pathos
Genetic Fallacy
44. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.
Dog whistle
Ad misericordia
Appeal to the golden mean
Ad vericundium
45. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second
False analogy
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Ad hominem
Dog whistle
46. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source
Opinion
Ethos
Either-or Reasoning
Ad vericundium
47. Information based on personal interpretation of facts
Inductive Reasoning
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Opinion
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
48. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.
Prevalent Proof
Equivocation
Ad populum
Deductive Reasoning
49. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic
Ethos
Division
Negative Proof
Ad hominem
50. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)
Irrelevant Proof
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Logos
Hasty generalization
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests