SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
SAT Essay Logical Fallacies
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
sat
,
english
,
writing-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to
Vagueness
Ad misericordia
Stereotyping
Negative Proof
2. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence
Nonsequiter
Red herring
Hasty generalization
False analogy
3. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented
Anecdote
Slippery Slope
Begging the question
Cause-effect relationships
4. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts
Genetic Fallacy
Vagueness
Smoke screen
Nonsequiter
5. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.
Appeal to the golden mean
Ad hominem
Straw man
Equivocation
6. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed
Numbers
Equivocation
Ad populum
Red herring
7. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?
Begging the question
Statistic
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Cause-effect relationships
8. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.
Red Herring
Appeal to Authority
False scenario
Composition
9. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'
Slippery Slope
Double standard
False scenario
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
10. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence
Special pleading
Straw man
Ethos
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
11. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support
Either -or
Inductive Reasoning
Pathos
Begging the question
12. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase
Genetic Fallacy
Equivocation
Ad vericundium
Ethos
13. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
False analogy
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Division
14. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false
Negative Proof
Ad hominem
Statistic
Ad populum
15. Appeal based on the credibility of the author
Division
Hasty generalization
Ethos
Circular Reasoning
16. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion
Ad populum
Straw man
False authority
Either -or
17. Information based on personal interpretation of facts
Hasty generalization
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Appeal to Authority
Opinion
18. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)
Stereotyping
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Either-or Reasoning
Irrelevant Proof
19. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another
Smoke screen
False analogy
False authority
Double standard
20. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations
Vagueness
Inductive Reasoning
Ad populum
Appeal to the golden mean
21. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic
Vagueness
Division
Numbers
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
22. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue
Begging the question
Negative Proof
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Smoke screen
23. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.
Prevalent Proof
Equivocation
Hasty generalization
Composition
24. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea
Either-or Reasoning
Circular Reasoning
Stereotyping
Negative Proof
25. Information that can be objectively proven as true
Nonsequiter
Inductive Reasoning
False authority
Fact
26. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right
Circular Reasoning
Numbers
False analogy
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
27. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?
Anecdote
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Hasty generalization
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
28. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'
Ad hominem
Logos
Either -or
False scenario
29. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other
Inductive Reasoning
Undistributed Middle
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Correlation as cause
30. Appeal to reason
Pathos
Nonsequiter
Logos
Stereotyping
31. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second
Smoke screen
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Values
Straw man
32. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course
Either-or Reasoning
Numbers
Hasty generalization
Undistributed Middle
33. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?
Fact
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Logos
Division
34. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion
Smoke screen
Inductive Reasoning
Numbers
Either -or
35. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue
Straw man
Ad hominem
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Cause-effect relationships
36. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.
Dog whistle
Vagueness
Undistributed Middle
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
37. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source
Slippery Slope
Slippery slope
Inductive Reasoning
Ad vericundium
38. Appeal to the reader's emotions
Straw man
Pathos
Anecdote
Special pleading
39. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data
Cause-effect relationships
Statistic
Red Herring
Either -or
40. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.
Composition
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Appeal to Authority
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
41. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue
Fact
Red Herring
Logos
Special pleading
42. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience
Ad misericordia
Ad populum
Ethos
Nonsequiter
43. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Double standard
False analogy
Ad hominem
44. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence
Negative Proof
False scenario
Either-or Reasoning
Slippery slope
45. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Stereotyping
Values
Double standard
46. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply
Hasty generalization
Slippery slope
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
47. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'
Inductive Reasoning
Cause-effect relationships
False analogy
Undistributed Middle
48. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent
Ad misericordia
Division
False analogy
Hasty generalization
49. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause
Single cause
Slippery Slope
Either-or Reasoning
False analogy
50. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.
Straw man
Hasty generalization
Ad hominem
Red herring
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests