Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






2. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






3. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






4. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






5. Appeal to reason






6. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






7. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






8. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






9. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






10. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






11. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






12. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






13. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






14. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






15. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






16. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






17. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






18. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






19. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






20. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






21. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






22. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






23. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






24. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






25. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






26. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






27. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






28. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






29. Information that can be objectively proven as true






30. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






31. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






32. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






33. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






34. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






35. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






36. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






37. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






38. Appeal to the reader's emotions






39. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






40. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






41. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






42. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






43. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






44. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






45. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






46. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






47. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






48. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






49. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






50. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion