Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






2. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






3. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






4. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






5. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






6. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






7. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






8. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






9. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






10. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






11. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






12. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






13. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






14. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






15. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






16. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






17. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






18. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






19. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






20. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






21. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






22. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






23. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






24. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






25. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






26. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






27. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






28. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






29. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






30. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






31. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






32. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






33. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






34. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






35. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






36. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






37. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






38. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






39. Appeal to the reader's emotions






40. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






41. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






42. Appeal to reason






43. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






44. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






45. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






46. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






47. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






48. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






49. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






50. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?



Let me suggest you:

Browse all subjects

Browse all tests

Most popular tests



Major Subjects

Tests & Exams


AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT

Browse all subjects

Browse all tests

Most popular tests