SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
SAT Essay Logical Fallacies
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
sat
,
english
,
writing-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Information that can be objectively proven as true
Cause-effect relationships
Fact
Circular Reasoning
Statistic
2. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic
Red Herring
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Division
Values
3. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)
Red Herring
Irrelevant Proof
Nonsequiter
Oversimplification
4. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations
Vagueness
Negative Proof
Red herring
Ad populum
5. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'
Undistributed Middle
Ad hominem
Oversimplification
Numbers
6. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue
Oversimplification
Ad hominem
Circular Reasoning
Numbers
7. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion
Ad misericordia
Anecdote
Ad populum
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
8. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue
Straw man
Oversimplification
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Red Herring
9. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Statistic
Either-or Reasoning
10. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event
Statistic
Cause-effect relationships
Inductive Reasoning
Hasty generalization
11. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.
Special pleading
Ad populum
Either-or Reasoning
Appeal to Authority
12. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.
Stereotyping
Straw man
Values
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
13. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist
Smoke screen
Values
Logos
Either -or
14. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience
Equivocation
Ad vericundium
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Ad misericordia
15. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence
Special pleading
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Inductive Reasoning
Slippery slope
16. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support
Special pleading
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Begging the question
17. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true
Equivocation
Values
Begging the question
Special pleading
18. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented
Straw man
Slippery Slope
Ethos
Appeal to the golden mean
19. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case
Appeal to the golden mean
Deductive Reasoning
Statistic
Logos
20. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.
Equivocation
Opinion
Composition
Appeal to the golden mean
21. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another
Either-or Reasoning
False authority
Division
Dog whistle
22. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course
Statistic
Values
Either-or Reasoning
Prevalent Proof
23. Appeal to the reader's emotions
Correlation as cause
Pathos
Division
Nonsequiter
24. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Vagueness
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Appeal to the golden mean
25. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data
Nonsequiter
Statistic
Logos
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
26. Information based on personal interpretation of facts
Opinion
Values
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Slippery slope
27. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent
Logos
Stereotyping
Ad vericundium
False analogy
28. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.
Ad hominem
Composition
Undistributed Middle
False scenario
29. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.
Dog whistle
Logos
Ad misericordia
Red Herring
30. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Ad hominem
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Single cause
31. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Circular Reasoning
Ad vericundium
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
32. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion
Genetic Fallacy
Inductive Reasoning
Prevalent Proof
Smoke screen
33. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase
Deductive Reasoning
Ad misericordia
Equivocation
Straw man
34. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.
Slippery Slope
Prevalent Proof
Double standard
Hasty generalization
35. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it
False scenario
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Appeal to Authority
Genetic Fallacy
36. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Oversimplification
37. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue
Appeal to the golden mean
False authority
Smoke screen
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
38. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Irrelevant Proof
Deductive Reasoning
39. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to
Statistic
Nonsequiter
Stereotyping
Ad misericordia
40. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'
Ad hominem
Oversimplification
False scenario
Logos
41. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence
Ad hominem
Prevalent Proof
Red Herring
Hasty generalization
42. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?
Equivocation
Nonsequiter
Numbers
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
43. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false
Hasty generalization
Equivocation
Negative Proof
Equivocation
44. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source
Stereotyping
Ad vericundium
Nonsequiter
Red Herring
45. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Hasty generalization
46. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right
Cause-effect relationships
Division
Numbers
Deductive Reasoning
47. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts
Nonsequiter
False authority
Appeal to the golden mean
Circular Reasoning
48. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause
Prevalent Proof
Single cause
Irrelevant Proof
Ad hominem
49. Appeal based on the credibility of the author
Equivocation
Ethos
Either -or
Slippery Slope
50. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence
Circular Reasoning
Equivocation
Special pleading
Statistic
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests