Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






2. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






3. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






4. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






5. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






6. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






7. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






8. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






9. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






10. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






11. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






12. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






13. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






14. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






15. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






16. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






17. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






18. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






19. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






20. Appeal to the reader's emotions






21. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






22. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






23. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






24. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






25. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






26. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






27. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






28. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






29. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






30. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






31. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






32. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






33. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






34. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






35. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






36. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






37. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






38. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






39. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






40. Appeal to reason






41. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






42. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






43. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






44. Information that can be objectively proven as true






45. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






46. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






47. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






48. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






49. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






50. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.