Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






2. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






3. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






4. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






5. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






6. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






7. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






8. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






9. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






10. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






11. Appeal to the reader's emotions






12. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






13. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






14. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






15. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






16. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






17. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






18. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






19. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






20. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






21. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






22. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






23. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






24. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






25. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






26. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






27. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






28. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






29. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






30. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






31. Information that can be objectively proven as true






32. Appeal to reason






33. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






34. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






35. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






36. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






37. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






38. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






39. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






40. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






41. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






42. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






43. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






44. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






45. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






46. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






47. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






48. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






49. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






50. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.