SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
SAT Essay Logical Fallacies
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
sat
,
english
,
writing-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Information that can be objectively proven as true
Inductive Reasoning
Numbers
Ad vericundium
Fact
2. Information based on personal interpretation of facts
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
False analogy
Equivocation
Opinion
3. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)
Hasty generalization
Ad populum
Irrelevant Proof
Nonsequiter
4. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion
Red Herring
Ad populum
Prevalent Proof
Straw man
5. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'
Single cause
Either-or Reasoning
Appeal to Authority
Undistributed Middle
6. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right
Numbers
Composition
Red Herring
Double standard
7. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.
Ad misericordia
Negative Proof
Hasty generalization
Appeal to Authority
8. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Undistributed Middle
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Values
9. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.
Statistic
Ad populum
Prevalent Proof
Composition
10. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event
Deductive Reasoning
Cause-effect relationships
Hasty generalization
Composition
11. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.
Hasty generalization
Genetic Fallacy
Appeal to the golden mean
Appeal to Authority
12. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'
False scenario
Deductive Reasoning
Ad hominem
Equivocation
13. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Ethos
Equivocation
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
14. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Pathos
False analogy
Either-or Reasoning
15. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed
Red herring
Ethos
False authority
Smoke screen
16. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply
Red Herring
Hasty generalization
Either-or Reasoning
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
17. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue
Either-or Reasoning
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Oversimplification
Ad hominem
18. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support
Fact
Double standard
Circular Reasoning
Begging the question
19. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Slippery Slope
Single cause
Negative Proof
20. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it
Either-or Reasoning
Genetic Fallacy
Hasty generalization
Inductive Reasoning
21. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true
Red Herring
Values
Either-or Reasoning
Appeal to the golden mean
22. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.
Composition
Either-or Reasoning
Appeal to Authority
Vagueness
23. Appeal based on the credibility of the author
Straw man
Stereotyping
Ethos
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
24. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence
Special pleading
Equivocation
Hasty generalization
Correlation as cause
25. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern
Circular Reasoning
Hasty generalization
Anecdote
False analogy
26. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second
Either-or Reasoning
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Prevalent Proof
Division
27. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?
Undistributed Middle
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Negative Proof
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
28. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic
Hasty generalization
Division
Stereotyping
Red herring
29. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another
False authority
Slippery Slope
Appeal to the golden mean
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
30. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Straw man
Ad misericordia
Red Herring
31. Appeal to reason
Division
False analogy
Stereotyping
Logos
32. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case
Double standard
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Anecdote
Deductive Reasoning
33. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false
Cause-effect relationships
Negative Proof
Ethos
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
34. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist
Slippery Slope
Either -or
Numbers
Anecdote
35. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Equivocation
Double standard
Statistic
36. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Ad hominem
Hasty generalization
Either-or Reasoning
37. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria
False scenario
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Values
Double standard
38. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Anecdote
False analogy
Nonsequiter
39. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other
Correlation as cause
Single cause
Red herring
Either-or Reasoning
40. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Undistributed Middle
41. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.
Dog whistle
False authority
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Ad hominem
42. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue
Vagueness
Circular Reasoning
Smoke screen
Opinion
43. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.
Values
Equivocation
Dog whistle
Begging the question
44. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue
Numbers
Cause-effect relationships
Ad misericordia
Ad hominem
45. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause
Appeal to the golden mean
Appeal to Authority
Correlation as cause
Single cause
46. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to
Undistributed Middle
Division
Straw man
Stereotyping
47. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Irrelevant Proof
Pathos
Composition
48. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Ad vericundium
Single cause
Either -or
49. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'
Special pleading
Ad hominem
Appeal to Authority
False scenario
50. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence
Dog whistle
Ad hominem
Ad hominem
Slippery slope
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests