Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






2. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






3. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






4. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






5. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






6. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






7. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






8. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






9. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






10. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






11. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






12. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






13. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






14. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






15. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






16. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






17. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






18. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






19. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






20. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






21. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






22. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






23. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






24. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






25. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






26. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






27. Information that can be objectively proven as true






28. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






29. Appeal to the reader's emotions






30. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






31. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






32. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






33. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






34. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






35. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






36. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






37. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






38. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






39. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






40. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






41. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






42. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






43. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






44. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






45. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






46. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






47. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






48. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






49. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






50. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other