Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






2. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






3. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






4. Appeal to reason






5. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






6. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






7. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






8. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






9. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






10. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






11. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






12. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






13. Appeal to the reader's emotions






14. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






15. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






16. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






17. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






18. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






19. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






20. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






21. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






22. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






23. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






24. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






25. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






26. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






27. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






28. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






29. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






30. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






31. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






32. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






33. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






34. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






35. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






36. Information that can be objectively proven as true






37. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






38. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






39. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






40. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






41. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






42. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






43. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






44. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






45. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






46. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






47. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






48. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






49. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






50. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts