Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






2. Appeal to the reader's emotions






3. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






4. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






5. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






6. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






7. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






8. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






9. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






10. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






11. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






12. Information that can be objectively proven as true






13. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






14. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






15. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






16. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






17. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






18. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






19. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






20. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






21. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






22. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






23. Appeal to reason






24. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






25. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






26. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






27. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






28. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






29. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






30. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






31. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






32. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






33. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






34. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






35. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






36. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






37. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






38. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






39. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






40. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






41. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






42. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






43. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






44. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






45. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






46. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






47. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






48. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






49. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






50. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause