Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






2. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






3. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






4. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






5. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






6. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






7. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






8. Information that can be objectively proven as true






9. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






10. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






11. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






12. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






13. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






14. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






15. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






16. Appeal to reason






17. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






18. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






19. Appeal to the reader's emotions






20. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






21. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






22. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






23. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






24. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






25. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






26. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






27. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






28. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






29. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






30. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






31. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






32. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






33. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






34. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






35. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






36. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






37. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






38. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






39. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






40. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






41. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






42. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






43. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






44. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






45. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






46. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






47. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






48. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






49. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






50. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other