Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






2. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






3. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






4. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






5. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






6. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






7. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






8. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






9. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






10. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






11. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






12. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






13. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






14. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






15. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






16. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






17. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






18. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






19. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






20. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






21. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






22. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






23. Information that can be objectively proven as true






24. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






25. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






26. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






27. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






28. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






29. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






30. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






31. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






32. Appeal to reason






33. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






34. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






35. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






36. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






37. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






38. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






39. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






40. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






41. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






42. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






43. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






44. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






45. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






46. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






47. Appeal to the reader's emotions






48. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






49. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






50. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.