Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






2. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






3. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






4. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






5. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






6. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






7. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






8. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






9. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






10. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






11. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






12. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






13. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






14. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






15. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






16. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






17. Appeal to reason






18. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






19. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






20. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






21. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






22. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






23. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






24. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






25. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






26. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






27. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






28. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






29. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






30. Information that can be objectively proven as true






31. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






32. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






33. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






34. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






35. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






36. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






37. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






38. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






39. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






40. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






41. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






42. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






43. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






44. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






45. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






46. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






47. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






48. Appeal to the reader's emotions






49. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






50. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support