Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






2. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






3. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






4. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






5. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






6. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






7. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






8. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






9. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






10. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






11. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






12. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






13. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






14. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






15. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






16. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






17. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






18. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






19. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






20. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






21. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






22. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






23. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






24. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






25. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






26. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






27. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






28. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






29. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






30. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






31. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






32. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






33. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






34. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






35. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






36. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






37. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






38. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






39. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






40. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






41. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






42. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






43. Appeal to the reader's emotions






44. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






45. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






46. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






47. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






48. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






49. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






50. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations