Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






2. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






3. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






4. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






5. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






6. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






7. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






8. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






9. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






10. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






11. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






12. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






13. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






14. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






15. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






16. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






17. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






18. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






19. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






20. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






21. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






22. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






23. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






24. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






25. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






26. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






27. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






28. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






29. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






30. Appeal to reason






31. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






32. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






33. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






34. Appeal to the reader's emotions






35. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






36. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






37. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






38. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






39. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






40. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






41. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






42. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






43. Information that can be objectively proven as true






44. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






45. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






46. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






47. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






48. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






49. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






50. Information based on personal interpretation of facts