SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
SAT Essay Logical Fallacies
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
sat
,
english
,
writing-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.
Straw man
False analogy
Special pleading
Oversimplification
2. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Oversimplification
Correlation as cause
Begging the question
3. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist
Deductive Reasoning
Either -or
Appeal to the golden mean
Numbers
4. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Numbers
Nonsequiter
Opinion
5. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Values
Statistic
False authority
6. Information that can be objectively proven as true
Ad hominem
Hasty generalization
Fact
Ad populum
7. Appeal based on the credibility of the author
Straw man
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Fact
Ethos
8. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience
Ethos
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Straw man
Ad misericordia
9. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other
Double standard
Ethos
Statistic
Correlation as cause
10. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support
False scenario
False authority
Begging the question
Cause-effect relationships
11. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations
Oversimplification
Vagueness
False analogy
Ethos
12. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion
Inductive Reasoning
Numbers
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Correlation as cause
13. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?
Pathos
Prevalent Proof
Red herring
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
14. Information based on personal interpretation of facts
Ad populum
Cause-effect relationships
Inductive Reasoning
Opinion
15. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply
Red herring
Slippery Slope
Single cause
Hasty generalization
16. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to
False authority
Red Herring
Division
Stereotyping
17. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.
Prevalent Proof
Either -or
Composition
Opinion
18. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue
Negative Proof
Single cause
Fact
Smoke screen
19. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion
Oversimplification
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Red herring
Ad populum
20. Appeal to the reader's emotions
Pathos
Oversimplification
Stereotyping
Prevalent Proof
21. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'
False scenario
Smoke screen
Inductive Reasoning
Logos
22. Appeal to reason
Slippery slope
Inductive Reasoning
Logos
Pathos
23. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'
Deductive Reasoning
Hasty generalization
Ad hominem
Genetic Fallacy
24. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Ad misericordia
Vagueness
Division
25. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence
Deductive Reasoning
Appeal to the golden mean
Slippery slope
Ad populum
26. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another
Fact
Cause-effect relationships
Ad hominem
False authority
27. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.
Single cause
Division
False scenario
Equivocation
28. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence
Either -or
Hasty generalization
Cause-effect relationships
Composition
29. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?
Single cause
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Anecdote
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
30. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course
Smoke screen
False analogy
Negative Proof
Either-or Reasoning
31. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Equivocation
Ethos
Dog whistle
32. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false
Ad populum
Negative Proof
Composition
Numbers
33. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event
Negative Proof
Single cause
Cause-effect relationships
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
34. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Ad hominem
Undistributed Middle
Straw man
35. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence
Special pleading
Single cause
Fact
Opinion
36. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case
Inductive Reasoning
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Deductive Reasoning
Either -or
37. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase
Statistic
Undistributed Middle
Values
Equivocation
38. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.
Statistic
Prevalent Proof
Irrelevant Proof
Equivocation
39. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Appeal to Authority
Equivocation
Ad vericundium
40. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)
Irrelevant Proof
False authority
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Vagueness
41. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern
Anecdote
Equivocation
Ad populum
Negative Proof
42. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea
Circular Reasoning
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Begging the question
Nonsequiter
43. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented
Prevalent Proof
Logos
Genetic Fallacy
Slippery Slope
44. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?
Either -or
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Irrelevant Proof
45. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts
Slippery slope
Nonsequiter
Either-or Reasoning
Values
46. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right
Numbers
Fact
Special pleading
Circular Reasoning
47. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident
Oversimplification
Deductive Reasoning
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Slippery slope
48. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second
Logos
Either-or Reasoning
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
49. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data
Hasty generalization
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Statistic
Either -or
50. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Slippery Slope
Slippery slope
Ad hominem