Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






2. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






3. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






4. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






5. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






6. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






7. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






8. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






9. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






10. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






11. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






12. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






13. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






14. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






15. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






16. Appeal to reason






17. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






18. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






19. Information that can be objectively proven as true






20. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






21. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






22. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






23. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






24. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






25. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






26. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






27. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






28. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






29. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






30. Appeal to the reader's emotions






31. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






32. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






33. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






34. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






35. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






36. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






37. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






38. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






39. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






40. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






41. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






42. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






43. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






44. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






45. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






46. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






47. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






48. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






49. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






50. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second