Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






2. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






3. Appeal to the reader's emotions






4. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






5. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






6. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






7. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






8. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






9. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






10. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






11. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






12. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






13. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






14. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






15. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






16. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






17. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






18. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






19. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






20. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






21. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






22. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






23. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






24. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






25. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






26. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






27. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






28. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






29. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






30. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






31. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






32. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






33. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






34. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






35. Appeal to reason






36. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






37. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






38. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






39. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






40. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






41. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






42. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






43. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






44. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






45. Information that can be objectively proven as true






46. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






47. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






48. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






49. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






50. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?