Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Appeal to the reader's emotions






2. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






3. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






4. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






5. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






6. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






7. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






8. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






9. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






10. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






11. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






12. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






13. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






14. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






15. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






16. Information that can be objectively proven as true






17. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






18. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






19. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






20. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






21. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






22. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






23. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






24. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






25. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






26. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






27. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






28. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






29. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






30. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






31. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






32. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






33. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






34. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






35. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






36. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






37. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






38. Appeal to reason






39. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






40. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






41. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






42. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






43. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






44. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






45. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






46. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






47. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






48. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






49. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






50. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.