Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






2. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






3. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






4. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






5. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






6. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






7. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






8. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






9. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






10. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






11. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






12. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






13. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






14. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






15. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






16. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






17. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






18. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






19. Appeal to reason






20. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






21. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






22. Appeal to the reader's emotions






23. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






24. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






25. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






26. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






27. Information that can be objectively proven as true






28. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






29. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






30. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






31. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






32. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






33. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






34. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






35. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






36. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






37. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






38. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






39. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






40. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






41. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






42. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






43. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






44. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






45. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






46. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






47. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






48. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






49. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






50. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent