SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
SAT Essay Logical Fallacies
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
sat
,
english
,
writing-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source
Correlation as cause
Ad vericundium
Stereotyping
Opinion
2. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second
Appeal to Authority
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Values
False scenario
3. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.
Appeal to Authority
False analogy
Prevalent Proof
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
4. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause
Special pleading
Values
Single cause
Anecdote
5. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right
Double standard
Numbers
Anecdote
Dog whistle
6. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'
Ad vericundium
Equivocation
Red Herring
False scenario
7. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations
Hasty generalization
Smoke screen
Either -or
Vagueness
8. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea
Negative Proof
Deductive Reasoning
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Circular Reasoning
9. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to
Numbers
False scenario
Undistributed Middle
Stereotyping
10. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Nonsequiter
Either-or Reasoning
Numbers
11. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other
Correlation as cause
Ad hominem
Vagueness
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
12. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.
Composition
Appeal to Authority
Nonsequiter
Single cause
13. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion
Division
Equivocation
Fact
Ad populum
14. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Ad misericordia
Genetic Fallacy
Equivocation
15. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data
Smoke screen
Statistic
Fact
Appeal to the golden mean
16. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern
Negative Proof
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Anecdote
Ethos
17. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another
False authority
Correlation as cause
Equivocation
Oversimplification
18. Information that can be objectively proven as true
Opinion
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Deductive Reasoning
Fact
19. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.
Ad vericundium
Composition
Circular Reasoning
Anecdote
20. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Ethos
Red Herring
Special pleading
21. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?
Stereotyping
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Red Herring
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
22. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Ad hominem
Circular Reasoning
Single cause
23. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.
Inductive Reasoning
Ad misericordia
Equivocation
Slippery Slope
24. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence
Slippery slope
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Equivocation
Prevalent Proof
25. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue
False authority
Ad hominem
Red Herring
Fact
26. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support
Begging the question
Smoke screen
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Circular Reasoning
27. Information based on personal interpretation of facts
Straw man
Equivocation
Stereotyping
Opinion
28. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.
Ad vericundium
Appeal to the golden mean
Nonsequiter
Negative Proof
29. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Equivocation
Undistributed Middle
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
30. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase
Equivocation
Undistributed Middle
Opinion
Ad vericundium
31. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course
Single cause
Statistic
Cause-effect relationships
Either-or Reasoning
32. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue
Ad populum
Straw man
Hasty generalization
Oversimplification
33. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)
Ad hominem
Hasty generalization
Irrelevant Proof
Dog whistle
34. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent
False analogy
Pathos
Opinion
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
35. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented
Slippery Slope
False authority
Values
Undistributed Middle
36. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.
Inductive Reasoning
Straw man
False scenario
False analogy
37. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.
False scenario
Correlation as cause
Dog whistle
Fact
38. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'
Undistributed Middle
Special pleading
Pathos
Statistic
39. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Equivocation
Oversimplification
Ad vericundium
40. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic
Either-or Reasoning
Irrelevant Proof
Division
Ad hominem
41. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue
Ad populum
Ad hominem
False analogy
Inductive Reasoning
42. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true
False authority
Values
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Red Herring
43. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue
Straw man
Red Herring
Logos
Smoke screen
44. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion
Inductive Reasoning
Ad misericordia
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Ethos
45. Appeal to the reader's emotions
Pathos
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Equivocation
Ad hominem
46. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed
Negative Proof
Composition
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Red herring
47. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply
Hasty generalization
Undistributed Middle
Slippery Slope
Opinion
48. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Negative Proof
Undistributed Middle
49. Appeal to reason
Single cause
Slippery slope
Anecdote
Logos
50. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event
Correlation as cause
Either -or
Oversimplification
Cause-effect relationships