Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






2. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






3. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






4. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






5. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






6. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






7. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






8. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






9. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






10. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






11. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






12. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






13. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






14. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






15. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






16. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






17. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






18. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






19. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






20. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






21. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






22. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






23. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






24. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






25. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






26. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






27. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






28. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






29. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






30. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






31. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






32. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






33. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






34. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






35. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






36. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






37. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






38. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






39. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






40. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






41. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






42. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






43. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






44. Information that can be objectively proven as true






45. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






46. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






47. Appeal to the reader's emotions






48. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






49. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






50. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic