Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






2. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






3. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






4. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






5. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






6. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






7. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






8. Information that can be objectively proven as true






9. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






10. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






11. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






12. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






13. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






14. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






15. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






16. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






17. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






18. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






19. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






20. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






21. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






22. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






23. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






24. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






25. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






26. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






27. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






28. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






29. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






30. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






31. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






32. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






33. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






34. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






35. Appeal to reason






36. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






37. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






38. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






39. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






40. Appeal to the reader's emotions






41. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






42. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






43. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






44. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






45. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






46. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






47. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






48. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






49. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






50. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other