SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
SAT Essay Logical Fallacies
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
sat
,
english
,
writing-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Information that can be objectively proven as true
Fact
Ad hominem
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
False scenario
2. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence
Anecdote
Hasty generalization
Undistributed Middle
Numbers
3. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?
Slippery Slope
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Equivocation
Oversimplification
4. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.
Fact
Straw man
Appeal to Authority
Smoke screen
5. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern
Ad misericordia
Anecdote
Slippery Slope
Logos
6. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Irrelevant Proof
Numbers
Logos
7. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case
False scenario
Slippery slope
Deductive Reasoning
Straw man
8. Information based on personal interpretation of facts
Vagueness
Opinion
Red Herring
Oversimplification
9. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?
Stereotyping
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Cause-effect relationships
10. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent
Ad hominem
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Opinion
False analogy
11. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Slippery Slope
Smoke screen
Equivocation
12. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to
Stereotyping
Correlation as cause
Anecdote
Statistic
13. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence
Anecdote
Numbers
Division
Special pleading
14. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Correlation as cause
Dog whistle
Division
15. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source
Ad vericundium
Undistributed Middle
Logos
Appeal to Authority
16. Appeal to reason
False scenario
Opinion
False analogy
Logos
17. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Prevalent Proof
False analogy
Dog whistle
18. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply
Pathos
Either-or Reasoning
Hasty generalization
Division
19. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts
Either-or Reasoning
Nonsequiter
Deductive Reasoning
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
20. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause
Slippery Slope
Vagueness
Straw man
Single cause
21. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence
Composition
Slippery slope
Hasty generalization
Either -or
22. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations
False authority
Single cause
Ad populum
Vagueness
23. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase
Equivocation
Deductive Reasoning
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Oversimplification
24. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course
Numbers
Either-or Reasoning
Ad populum
Ethos
25. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.
Pathos
Equivocation
Slippery Slope
Ad populum
26. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data
Slippery slope
Correlation as cause
Statistic
Stereotyping
27. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'
Undistributed Middle
Ad hominem
Slippery slope
Genetic Fallacy
28. Appeal to the reader's emotions
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Red Herring
Pathos
Inductive Reasoning
29. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true
Stereotyping
Cause-effect relationships
Values
Statistic
30. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.
Prevalent Proof
Double standard
Hasty generalization
Red herring
31. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.
Appeal to the golden mean
Ad vericundium
Logos
Special pleading
32. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)
Circular Reasoning
Ethos
Irrelevant Proof
Equivocation
33. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
False authority
Oversimplification
Single cause
34. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria
Nonsequiter
Double standard
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Ad populum
35. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion
Ad populum
Equivocation
Either -or
Ad misericordia
36. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?
Vagueness
Straw man
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
False analogy
37. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist
Either -or
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Composition
Deductive Reasoning
38. Appeal based on the credibility of the author
Ethos
Cause-effect relationships
Ad misericordia
Circular Reasoning
39. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Deductive Reasoning
Genetic Fallacy
Ad hominem
40. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'
Fact
Red Herring
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
False scenario
41. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue
Negative Proof
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Oversimplification
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
42. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.
Composition
Double standard
Hasty generalization
Special pleading
43. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'
Ad hominem
Inductive Reasoning
Composition
Ad populum
44. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false
Negative Proof
Equivocation
Either-or Reasoning
Single cause
45. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience
Oversimplification
Ad misericordia
Special pleading
Dog whistle
46. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident
Circular Reasoning
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Undistributed Middle
Logos
47. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue
Cause-effect relationships
Dog whistle
Fact
Smoke screen
48. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second
Ad populum
Stereotyping
Irrelevant Proof
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
49. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea
Single cause
Smoke screen
Equivocation
Circular Reasoning
50. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue
Red Herring
Appeal to Authority
Hasty generalization
Double standard