Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






2. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






3. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






4. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






5. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






6. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






7. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






8. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






9. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






10. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






11. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






12. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






13. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






14. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






15. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






16. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






17. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






18. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






19. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






20. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






21. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






22. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






23. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






24. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






25. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






26. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






27. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






28. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






29. Appeal to the reader's emotions






30. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






31. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






32. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






33. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






34. Appeal to reason






35. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






36. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






37. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






38. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






39. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






40. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






41. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






42. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






43. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






44. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






45. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






46. Information that can be objectively proven as true






47. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






48. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






49. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






50. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent