Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations






2. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






3. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course






4. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






5. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






6. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






7. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






8. Appeal to reason






9. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






10. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






11. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






12. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence






13. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source






14. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






15. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






16. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data






17. Information that can be objectively proven as true






18. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






19. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






20. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






21. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






22. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






23. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






24. Appeal to the reader's emotions






25. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






26. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase






27. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






28. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.






29. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






30. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






31. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






32. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true






33. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






34. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






35. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






36. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






37. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






38. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?






39. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






40. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






41. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






42. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






43. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.






44. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






45. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






46. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






47. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






48. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






49. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






50. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?