SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
SAT Essay Logical Fallacies
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
sat
,
english
,
writing-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Cause-effect relationships
Prevalent Proof
Smoke screen
2. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident
Begging the question
Cause-effect relationships
Straw man
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
3. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.
Equivocation
Special pleading
Straw man
Negative Proof
4. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence
Hasty generalization
Red Herring
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Division
5. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data
Statistic
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Cause-effect relationships
Smoke screen
6. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'
Anecdote
Equivocation
Undistributed Middle
Appeal to the golden mean
7. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue
Ad hominem
Values
Smoke screen
Logos
8. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source
False authority
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Smoke screen
Ad vericundium
9. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
False authority
Ad hominem
Slippery slope
10. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion
Ad populum
False scenario
Appeal to Authority
Special pleading
11. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'
Ad hominem
Appeal to Authority
Equivocation
Begging the question
12. Appeal based on the credibility of the author
Prevalent Proof
Ethos
Opinion
Equivocation
13. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed
Straw man
Ad hominem
Red herring
Circular Reasoning
14. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?
Division
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
15. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event
Ad hominem
Cause-effect relationships
Pathos
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
16. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right
Correlation as cause
Irrelevant Proof
Hasty generalization
Numbers
17. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.
Ad hominem
Appeal to Authority
Special pleading
Appeal to the golden mean
18. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course
Ad vericundium
Begging the question
Either-or Reasoning
Appeal to the golden mean
19. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Circular Reasoning
Slippery slope
Negative Proof
20. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented
Ad hominem
Stereotyping
Hasty generalization
Slippery Slope
21. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic
Composition
Division
Prevalent Proof
Double standard
22. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria
Double standard
Pathos
Genetic Fallacy
Prevalent Proof
23. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?
Straw man
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Statistic
24. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Values
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Division
25. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Red herring
Logos
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
26. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion
Division
Appeal to Authority
Fact
Inductive Reasoning
27. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.
Dog whistle
False scenario
Hasty generalization
Slippery Slope
28. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience
Ad misericordia
Straw man
Anecdote
Either-or Reasoning
29. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue
Red Herring
Appeal to Authority
Nonsequiter
Oversimplification
30. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
False analogy
Either-or Reasoning
Equivocation
31. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'
Hasty generalization
Negative Proof
Appeal to Authority
False scenario
32. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Prevalent Proof
Red Herring
Correlation as cause
33. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.
Logos
Either-or Reasoning
Either -or
Appeal to the golden mean
34. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence
Special pleading
Values
Statistic
Irrelevant Proof
35. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause
Single cause
Inductive Reasoning
Prevalent Proof
Hasty generalization
36. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true
Slippery Slope
Cause-effect relationships
Values
False authority
37. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern
Anecdote
Numbers
Negative Proof
Prevalent Proof
38. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence
Straw man
Slippery slope
Either-or Reasoning
Red Herring
39. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea
Negative Proof
Begging the question
Circular Reasoning
Appeal to the golden mean
40. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.
Composition
Single cause
Hasty generalization
Opinion
41. Appeal to the reader's emotions
Ad populum
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Pathos
Hasty generalization
42. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations
Vagueness
Red herring
Pathos
Ad hominem
43. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue
Logos
Ad misericordia
Ad hominem
Smoke screen
44. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)
Correlation as cause
False scenario
Irrelevant Proof
Ad hominem
45. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it
Genetic Fallacy
Anecdote
Equivocation
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
46. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second
Composition
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Opinion
Ad hominem
47. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to
False analogy
Appeal to the golden mean
Stereotyping
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
48. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent
Irrelevant Proof
Ad hominem
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
False analogy
49. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case
Stereotyping
Deductive Reasoning
False scenario
Pathos
50. Information based on personal interpretation of facts
Hasty generalization
Ad vericundium
Prevalent Proof
Opinion
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests