Test your basic knowledge |

SAT Essay Logical Fallacies

Subjects : sat, english, writing-skills
Instructions:
  • Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event






2. Appeal to the reader's emotions






3. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another






4. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident






5. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'






6. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'






7. Appeal to reason






8. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?






9. Appeal to the the pity - sympathy or 'misery' of the audience






10. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?






11. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist






12. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern






13. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.






14. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to






15. Condemning an argument because of where it began - how it began - or who began it






16. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic






17. Information that can be objectively proven as true






18. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.






19. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria






20. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue






21. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue






22. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?






23. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.






24. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion






25. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)






26. 'After this therefore because of this' implying that because on event follows another - the first caused the second






27. Writer encourages readers to accept a conclusion without any support






28. Analogy or comparison that is not logically consistent






29. Have all reasonable alternatives been considered/eliminated? Does this author attack the other views in a fair way?






30. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.






31. Fallacy that asserts that given two positions - there exists a compromise between them which must be correct.






32. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts






33. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right






34. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause






35. Cause and Effect: 'What if' fallacy. Argues that everything would be different if one variable was different. Example: 'If the Nazis had won WWII - we'd all be speaking German!'






36. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence






37. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue






38. Appeal based on the credibility of the author






39. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea






40. Information based on personal interpretation of facts






41. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed






42. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion






43. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false






44. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented






45. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence






46. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue






47. Reasoning in which a conclusion is reached by stating a general principle and then applying that principle to a specific case






48. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other






49. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply






50. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data