SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
SAT Essay Logical Fallacies
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
sat
,
english
,
writing-skills
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Common knowledge or beliefs readers accept as true
Straw man
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
Logos
Values
2. Reasoning by Proof: absence of evidence is not evidence; he didn't say that... so it must be false
Logos
Begging the question
Negative Proof
Deductive Reasoning
3. Generalization: Assumes that an individual must have a characteristic because the group to which he or she belongs supposedly has that characteristic
Negative Proof
Ad populum
Opinion
Division
4. 'Against the man' attacking the person or group to which you are opposed rather than addressing the issue
Division
Oversimplification
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Ad hominem
5. Is there a reasonable connection between the cause and the effect? Is that connection explained? Are there other possible causes that have not been considered?
Ad hominem
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
Anecdote
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
6. Introducing an irrelevant point to divert readers' attention from the main issue being discussed
Composition
Red herring
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
7. How similar or how different are the cases being compared? How many point of comparison is the arguer using?
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Opinion
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
8. The use by a speaker of coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different (and negative) meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience.
Negative Proof
Dog whistle
Logos
Single cause
9. Information the writer asserts as being the result of an event
Anecdote
Either -or
Cause-effect relationships
Inductive Reasoning
10. Any diversion intended to distract attention from the main issue
Red Herring
Inductive Reasoning
Vagueness
Deductive Reasoning
11. Generalization: Assumes that members of a group must have a characteristic because one or more of its members has that characteristic.
Composition
Appeal to Authority
Single cause
Cause-effect relationships
12. Reasoning by Proof: the evidence offered does not really support the claim. Non Sequitur (It does not follow)
Irrelevant Proof
Prevalent Proof
Ad misericordia
Circular Reasoning
13. Prejudging an individual based on ideas one has about the group the individual belongs to
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Oversimplification
Stereotyping
Pathos
14. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented
Values
Correlation as cause
Slippery Slope
Deductive Reasoning
15. 'To the people' appeal to the prejudices of the audience - or claiming that (or a majority) supports your opinion
Stereotyping
Composition
Pathos
Ad populum
16. Appeal to the reader's emotions
Oversimplification
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Ad populum
Pathos
17. Concealing the author's true intent - belief - or attitude towards an issue
Smoke screen
Ethos
Evaluating Reasoning by Comparison
Double standard
18. Information based on personal interpretation of facts
Negative Proof
Ad vericundium
Cause-effect relationships
Opinion
19. Cause and Effect: Assuming that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Dog whistle
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Composition
20. Appeal to reason
Ethos
Hasty generalization
Logos
Hasty generalization
21. Ambiguity or multiplicity of interpretations of a repeated word or phrase
Inductive Reasoning
Undistributed Middle
Single cause
Equivocation
22. Reasoning by Proof: an argument that because someone worked hard at something - their conclusions must be right
Numbers
Oversimplification
Ad hominem
Begging the question
23. Cause and Effect: A fallacy that assumes that because two variables are correlated (happen at the same time) that one must have caused the other
Correlation as cause
Stereotyping
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Equivocation
24. Information that can be objectively proven as true
Division
Fact
Red Herring
Hasty generalization
25. Logical reasoning that establishes specific facts or contentions leading to a general conclusion
Straw man
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Either-or Reasoning
Inductive Reasoning
26. 'it does not follow' drawing a conclusion or making a transition that is not a logical result of the facts
Values
Prevalent Proof
False authority
Nonsequiter
27. Drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence; using all instances when only some apply
Appeal to Authority
Ethos
Hasty generalization
Slippery Slope
28. Reasoning by Proof: A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a person or institution.
Ethos
Appeal to Authority
Straw man
Evaluating Cause and Effect Reasoning
29. When a writer uses the same term in two different senses in an argument. i.e. People choose what laws they obey. The Law of Gravity is a law. I choose to disobey the law of gravity.
Correlation as cause
Equivocation
Fact
Pathos
30. Citing an expert on one subject as expert on another
Special pleading
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Hasty generalization
False authority
31. How large is the sample size? How representative is the sample?
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Composition
Cause-effect relationships
Circular Reasoning
32. Everybody knows fallacy. Asserts that some idea is common knowledge - so it must be true.
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Prevalent Proof
Straw man
Values
33. Does the evidence prove the point being argued? Is this authority an expert on this particular topic?
Evaluating Reasoning by Proof/Authority
Begging the question
Ad vericundium
Straw man
34. Information gained from personal experience representing a general pattern
Correlation as cause
Anecdote
Appeal to Authority
Statistic
35. Reasoning by Debate: In an argument - this is an attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas. It comes from the Latin meaning 'against the man.'
Values
False scenario
Correlation as cause
Ad hominem
36. Stating the only two interpretations of actions are alternatives - ignoring any compromise or moderate course
Logos
False analogy
Either-or Reasoning
Irrelevant Proof
37. Generalization: drawing conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence
Nonsequiter
Equivocation
Numbers
Hasty generalization
38. Appeal based on the credibility of the author
Values
Oversimplification
Stereotyping
Ethos
39. Trying to prove one idea with another idea that is too similar to the first idea
Slippery slope
Fact
Circular Reasoning
Oversimplification
40. False transitive property - you assume that just because two things share a characteristic - all of their characteristics are shared: - 'penguins are black and white - old tv shows are black and white - therefore penguins are old tv shows'
Single cause
Anecdote
Evaluating Reasoning by Generalization
Undistributed Middle
41. Two comparable issues or ideas are judged by different criteria
Negative Proof
Either-or Reasoning
Double standard
Hasty generalization
42. Generalization: an argument that ignores all unfavorable evidence
Slippery slope
Special pleading
False analogy
Undistributed Middle
43. Reasoning by Debate: When a writer argues against a claim that nobody actually holds or is universally considered weak. Setting up a straw man diverts attention from the real issues.
Straw man
Opinion
Prevalent Proof
Evaluating Reasoning by Debate
44. Statements that are intentionally vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations
Double standard
Vagueness
Ad populum
Prevalent Proof
45. Reasoning by Debate: A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist
Begging the question
False scenario
Either -or
Ad hominem
46. Claiming that one step in the wrong direction will lead to another - potentially disastrous consequence
Vagueness
Anecdote
Red herring
Slippery slope
47. 'To the authority' appeal based on the authority of a source
Ad vericundium
Single cause
Dog whistle
Smoke screen
48. Information that is an interpretation of numerical data
Statistic
Nonsequiter
False analogy
Negative Proof
49. Cause and Effect: claim than an event with more than one cause has only one cause
Single cause
Smoke screen
Double standard
Irrelevant Proof
50. Obscuring or denying the complexity of an issue
Irrelevant Proof
Oversimplification
Equivocation
Hasty generalization
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests