SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Argumentation And Critical Thinking
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 23 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Argument in which if the premises are all true - then the conclusion must be true
implication
valid argument
disjuctive syllogism
conclusion
2. If P then Q - not-Q therefore not-P - Note: beware of Q being a negative (e.g. - can't)
Modus tollens
implication
valid argument
equivalent argument
3. Isn't possibly false
weak inductive argument
strong inductive argument
implication
logically true sentence
4. Sentence A implies sentence B A's truth guarantees B's truth
weak inductive argument
argument
Modus ponens
implication
5. Premises don't support truth of conclusions
premise
strong inductive argument
deductive argument
weak inductive argument
6. Statement premise supports
Modus ponens
strong inductive argument
contradictory statement
conclusion
7. A can stand on its own as a sentence apart from B
contingent sentence
component sentence
logically true sentence
contradictory statement
8. An argument such that the truth of its premises makes the conclusion more or less 'probable' (but not certain).
inductive argument
logical operators
disjuctive syllogism
valid argument
9. Invalid argument in which if the premises are all true - they provide good reason to think the conclusion will also be true
strong inductive argument
Modus ponens
logically true sentence
contradictory statement
10. An argument incorporating the claim that it is impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true.
syllogism
deductive argument
valid argument
disjuctive syllogism
11. Sentence that is possibly true or false
invalid argument
contingent sentence
Modus tollens
premise
12. Any sentence that isn't contradictory
premise
compound sentence
satisfiable sentence
deductive argument
13. A deductive type of formal logic that presents two premises that inevitably lead to a sound conclusion. A=B - B=C - so A=C. 'All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore - Socrates is mortal.' Ex: Major premise: All M are P. Minor premise: All S
invalid argument
argument
equivalent argument
syllogism
14. Sentences where one or more are given as evidence or support for another
premise
deductive argument
argument
conclusion
15. Isn't possibly true
invalid argument
contingent sentence
equivalent argument
contradictory statement
16. If A and B are equivalent - then A implies B and B implies A (mutual implication)
Modus tollens
equivalent argument
strong inductive argument
logically true sentence
17. Valid argument with all true premises
implication
sound argument
equivalent argument
Modus tollens
18. If - then - and - or - not - if and only if - all - is. Watch for freestanding assertions vs. arguments.
equivalent argument
Modus tollens
satisfiable sentence
logical operators
19. If P then Q - P therefore Q
argument
weak inductive argument
Modus ponens
compound sentence
20. B has at least one component
Modus ponens
conclusion
compound sentence
argument
21. Argument in which the truth of all of the premises doesn't guarantee the truths of the conclusion
invalid argument
contingent sentence
strong inductive argument
logical operators
22. Statement(s) given as evidence
premise
strong inductive argument
inductive argument
satisfiable sentence
23. Either A or B. Not A. So - B. p v q - ~p - .'. q - 'We must go right or left. We can't go right - therefore we must go left.
Modus tollens
implication
disjuctive syllogism
premise