SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Argumentation And Critical Thinking
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 23 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. B has at least one component
logically true sentence
satisfiable sentence
strong inductive argument
compound sentence
2. Isn't possibly true
sound argument
contradictory statement
compound sentence
argument
3. Premises don't support truth of conclusions
component sentence
strong inductive argument
implication
weak inductive argument
4. If P then Q - P therefore Q
Modus ponens
Modus tollens
implication
weak inductive argument
5. Invalid argument in which if the premises are all true - they provide good reason to think the conclusion will also be true
strong inductive argument
sound argument
logical operators
invalid argument
6. An argument such that the truth of its premises makes the conclusion more or less 'probable' (but not certain).
Modus tollens
Modus ponens
compound sentence
inductive argument
7. Argument in which if the premises are all true - then the conclusion must be true
logically true sentence
contingent sentence
valid argument
logical operators
8. If P then Q - not-Q therefore not-P - Note: beware of Q being a negative (e.g. - can't)
Modus tollens
implication
logically true sentence
contingent sentence
9. Statement premise supports
deductive argument
component sentence
conclusion
implication
10. Isn't possibly false
weak inductive argument
equivalent argument
logically true sentence
inductive argument
11. Sentence A implies sentence B A's truth guarantees B's truth
syllogism
implication
inductive argument
Modus tollens
12. A deductive type of formal logic that presents two premises that inevitably lead to a sound conclusion. A=B - B=C - so A=C. 'All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore - Socrates is mortal.' Ex: Major premise: All M are P. Minor premise: All S
premise
valid argument
syllogism
logically true sentence
13. If - then - and - or - not - if and only if - all - is. Watch for freestanding assertions vs. arguments.
implication
logical operators
strong inductive argument
disjuctive syllogism
14. Statement(s) given as evidence
premise
logical operators
deductive argument
compound sentence
15. A can stand on its own as a sentence apart from B
conclusion
implication
component sentence
contradictory statement
16. Argument in which the truth of all of the premises doesn't guarantee the truths of the conclusion
satisfiable sentence
contradictory statement
strong inductive argument
invalid argument
17. Any sentence that isn't contradictory
satisfiable sentence
strong inductive argument
contingent sentence
Modus tollens
18. Sentence that is possibly true or false
conclusion
valid argument
contingent sentence
invalid argument
19. Either A or B. Not A. So - B. p v q - ~p - .'. q - 'We must go right or left. We can't go right - therefore we must go left.
disjuctive syllogism
inductive argument
logically true sentence
conclusion
20. If A and B are equivalent - then A implies B and B implies A (mutual implication)
invalid argument
equivalent argument
satisfiable sentence
valid argument
21. Sentences where one or more are given as evidence or support for another
component sentence
argument
conclusion
satisfiable sentence
22. Valid argument with all true premises
Modus tollens
satisfiable sentence
invalid argument
sound argument
23. An argument incorporating the claim that it is impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true.
weak inductive argument
equivalent argument
syllogism
deductive argument