SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Argumentation And Critical Thinking
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 23 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Either A or B. Not A. So - B. p v q - ~p - .'. q - 'We must go right or left. We can't go right - therefore we must go left.
disjuctive syllogism
contingent sentence
logical operators
contradictory statement
2. Isn't possibly false
implication
logically true sentence
deductive argument
argument
3. Statement(s) given as evidence
premise
weak inductive argument
strong inductive argument
deductive argument
4. Invalid argument in which if the premises are all true - they provide good reason to think the conclusion will also be true
weak inductive argument
strong inductive argument
disjuctive syllogism
deductive argument
5. Sentences where one or more are given as evidence or support for another
argument
logical operators
implication
satisfiable sentence
6. Valid argument with all true premises
sound argument
compound sentence
logically true sentence
syllogism
7. Statement premise supports
contradictory statement
premise
disjuctive syllogism
conclusion
8. Sentence A implies sentence B A's truth guarantees B's truth
Modus tollens
logical operators
conclusion
implication
9. Premises don't support truth of conclusions
satisfiable sentence
weak inductive argument
argument
strong inductive argument
10. B has at least one component
inductive argument
conclusion
compound sentence
logical operators
11. Any sentence that isn't contradictory
valid argument
satisfiable sentence
invalid argument
conclusion
12. Argument in which the truth of all of the premises doesn't guarantee the truths of the conclusion
logical operators
invalid argument
sound argument
weak inductive argument
13. A can stand on its own as a sentence apart from B
component sentence
argument
equivalent argument
invalid argument
14. A deductive type of formal logic that presents two premises that inevitably lead to a sound conclusion. A=B - B=C - so A=C. 'All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore - Socrates is mortal.' Ex: Major premise: All M are P. Minor premise: All S
syllogism
compound sentence
invalid argument
logically true sentence
15. If P then Q - P therefore Q
compound sentence
invalid argument
Modus ponens
component sentence
16. An argument incorporating the claim that it is impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true.
syllogism
logically true sentence
deductive argument
conclusion
17. If - then - and - or - not - if and only if - all - is. Watch for freestanding assertions vs. arguments.
logical operators
contingent sentence
Modus ponens
satisfiable sentence
18. If A and B are equivalent - then A implies B and B implies A (mutual implication)
argument
compound sentence
equivalent argument
contingent sentence
19. Sentence that is possibly true or false
conclusion
invalid argument
Modus ponens
contingent sentence
20. Argument in which if the premises are all true - then the conclusion must be true
valid argument
Modus ponens
conclusion
invalid argument
21. If P then Q - not-Q therefore not-P - Note: beware of Q being a negative (e.g. - can't)
sound argument
Modus tollens
implication
contingent sentence
22. An argument such that the truth of its premises makes the conclusion more or less 'probable' (but not certain).
Modus ponens
inductive argument
component sentence
logical operators
23. Isn't possibly true
premise
Modus ponens
contradictory statement
inductive argument