SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Argumentation And Critical Thinking
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 23 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Premises don't support truth of conclusions
satisfiable sentence
weak inductive argument
compound sentence
strong inductive argument
2. Statement premise supports
inductive argument
Modus tollens
conclusion
syllogism
3. If - then - and - or - not - if and only if - all - is. Watch for freestanding assertions vs. arguments.
implication
argument
sound argument
logical operators
4. If P then Q - not-Q therefore not-P - Note: beware of Q being a negative (e.g. - can't)
weak inductive argument
sound argument
implication
Modus tollens
5. An argument such that the truth of its premises makes the conclusion more or less 'probable' (but not certain).
inductive argument
Modus ponens
weak inductive argument
argument
6. Argument in which if the premises are all true - then the conclusion must be true
component sentence
valid argument
satisfiable sentence
deductive argument
7. If A and B are equivalent - then A implies B and B implies A (mutual implication)
argument
sound argument
equivalent argument
syllogism
8. Sentence A implies sentence B A's truth guarantees B's truth
satisfiable sentence
implication
logical operators
contradictory statement
9. Any sentence that isn't contradictory
valid argument
satisfiable sentence
premise
deductive argument
10. B has at least one component
argument
invalid argument
compound sentence
Modus ponens
11. A deductive type of formal logic that presents two premises that inevitably lead to a sound conclusion. A=B - B=C - so A=C. 'All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore - Socrates is mortal.' Ex: Major premise: All M are P. Minor premise: All S
premise
syllogism
deductive argument
conclusion
12. Invalid argument in which if the premises are all true - they provide good reason to think the conclusion will also be true
valid argument
strong inductive argument
sound argument
invalid argument
13. Sentence that is possibly true or false
logical operators
valid argument
contingent sentence
disjuctive syllogism
14. A can stand on its own as a sentence apart from B
premise
component sentence
argument
Modus tollens
15. An argument incorporating the claim that it is impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true.
deductive argument
disjuctive syllogism
conclusion
Modus ponens
16. Sentences where one or more are given as evidence or support for another
conclusion
argument
component sentence
satisfiable sentence
17. If P then Q - P therefore Q
argument
component sentence
contingent sentence
Modus ponens
18. Either A or B. Not A. So - B. p v q - ~p - .'. q - 'We must go right or left. We can't go right - therefore we must go left.
disjuctive syllogism
satisfiable sentence
compound sentence
component sentence
19. Isn't possibly false
logically true sentence
valid argument
contradictory statement
implication
20. Argument in which the truth of all of the premises doesn't guarantee the truths of the conclusion
syllogism
invalid argument
weak inductive argument
deductive argument
21. Statement(s) given as evidence
syllogism
valid argument
logical operators
premise
22. Isn't possibly true
strong inductive argument
disjuctive syllogism
syllogism
contradictory statement
23. Valid argument with all true premises
equivalent argument
sound argument
logical operators
compound sentence