SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Argumentation And Critical Thinking
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 23 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Either A or B. Not A. So - B. p v q - ~p - .'. q - 'We must go right or left. We can't go right - therefore we must go left.
logical operators
satisfiable sentence
disjuctive syllogism
valid argument
2. Any sentence that isn't contradictory
satisfiable sentence
implication
logically true sentence
premise
3. Sentences where one or more are given as evidence or support for another
argument
inductive argument
premise
compound sentence
4. Isn't possibly true
disjuctive syllogism
contradictory statement
deductive argument
premise
5. Statement premise supports
premise
implication
valid argument
conclusion
6. If P then Q - P therefore Q
equivalent argument
inductive argument
compound sentence
Modus ponens
7. B has at least one component
compound sentence
Modus ponens
inductive argument
contingent sentence
8. Argument in which if the premises are all true - then the conclusion must be true
logical operators
valid argument
contingent sentence
disjuctive syllogism
9. An argument incorporating the claim that it is impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true.
strong inductive argument
deductive argument
logically true sentence
equivalent argument
10. If A and B are equivalent - then A implies B and B implies A (mutual implication)
equivalent argument
contradictory statement
Modus ponens
weak inductive argument
11. Invalid argument in which if the premises are all true - they provide good reason to think the conclusion will also be true
component sentence
contradictory statement
implication
strong inductive argument
12. A deductive type of formal logic that presents two premises that inevitably lead to a sound conclusion. A=B - B=C - so A=C. 'All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore - Socrates is mortal.' Ex: Major premise: All M are P. Minor premise: All S
syllogism
deductive argument
invalid argument
equivalent argument
13. If P then Q - not-Q therefore not-P - Note: beware of Q being a negative (e.g. - can't)
sound argument
invalid argument
Modus tollens
satisfiable sentence
14. Premises don't support truth of conclusions
weak inductive argument
deductive argument
equivalent argument
strong inductive argument
15. A can stand on its own as a sentence apart from B
logically true sentence
Modus tollens
deductive argument
component sentence
16. Sentence that is possibly true or false
contradictory statement
contingent sentence
Modus ponens
logical operators
17. Valid argument with all true premises
weak inductive argument
syllogism
disjuctive syllogism
sound argument
18. An argument such that the truth of its premises makes the conclusion more or less 'probable' (but not certain).
syllogism
logical operators
inductive argument
contradictory statement
19. If - then - and - or - not - if and only if - all - is. Watch for freestanding assertions vs. arguments.
Modus tollens
invalid argument
conclusion
logical operators
20. Statement(s) given as evidence
premise
equivalent argument
compound sentence
Modus ponens
21. Isn't possibly false
sound argument
contradictory statement
satisfiable sentence
logically true sentence
22. Argument in which the truth of all of the premises doesn't guarantee the truths of the conclusion
compound sentence
disjuctive syllogism
logical operators
invalid argument
23. Sentence A implies sentence B A's truth guarantees B's truth
Modus ponens
implication
contradictory statement
argument