SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Argumentation And Critical Thinking
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 23 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Sentences where one or more are given as evidence or support for another
argument
satisfiable sentence
logically true sentence
inductive argument
2. An argument incorporating the claim that it is impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true.
satisfiable sentence
conclusion
weak inductive argument
deductive argument
3. Valid argument with all true premises
logical operators
sound argument
conclusion
compound sentence
4. A can stand on its own as a sentence apart from B
premise
logical operators
component sentence
sound argument
5. If P then Q - P therefore Q
weak inductive argument
Modus ponens
contingent sentence
argument
6. Statement(s) given as evidence
satisfiable sentence
component sentence
premise
contingent sentence
7. If A and B are equivalent - then A implies B and B implies A (mutual implication)
sound argument
Modus tollens
equivalent argument
component sentence
8. Isn't possibly true
logically true sentence
inductive argument
contradictory statement
weak inductive argument
9. B has at least one component
contradictory statement
equivalent argument
compound sentence
Modus ponens
10. Premises don't support truth of conclusions
strong inductive argument
sound argument
premise
weak inductive argument
11. Argument in which the truth of all of the premises doesn't guarantee the truths of the conclusion
contingent sentence
invalid argument
implication
deductive argument
12. If - then - and - or - not - if and only if - all - is. Watch for freestanding assertions vs. arguments.
invalid argument
premise
compound sentence
logical operators
13. Isn't possibly false
logical operators
disjuctive syllogism
logically true sentence
contradictory statement
14. An argument such that the truth of its premises makes the conclusion more or less 'probable' (but not certain).
inductive argument
conclusion
contingent sentence
disjuctive syllogism
15. A deductive type of formal logic that presents two premises that inevitably lead to a sound conclusion. A=B - B=C - so A=C. 'All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore - Socrates is mortal.' Ex: Major premise: All M are P. Minor premise: All S
Modus tollens
contradictory statement
syllogism
logical operators
16. Sentence A implies sentence B A's truth guarantees B's truth
Modus ponens
syllogism
disjuctive syllogism
implication
17. Any sentence that isn't contradictory
weak inductive argument
syllogism
satisfiable sentence
conclusion
18. Argument in which if the premises are all true - then the conclusion must be true
logically true sentence
Modus tollens
valid argument
premise
19. Invalid argument in which if the premises are all true - they provide good reason to think the conclusion will also be true
contradictory statement
strong inductive argument
implication
conclusion
20. Sentence that is possibly true or false
deductive argument
contradictory statement
contingent sentence
weak inductive argument
21. Statement premise supports
compound sentence
conclusion
argument
contingent sentence
22. Either A or B. Not A. So - B. p v q - ~p - .'. q - 'We must go right or left. We can't go right - therefore we must go left.
conclusion
disjuctive syllogism
weak inductive argument
satisfiable sentence
23. If P then Q - not-Q therefore not-P - Note: beware of Q being a negative (e.g. - can't)
Modus tollens
invalid argument
weak inductive argument
contradictory statement