SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Argumentation And Critical Thinking
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 23 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Statement premise supports
syllogism
component sentence
weak inductive argument
conclusion
2. B has at least one component
compound sentence
valid argument
strong inductive argument
logically true sentence
3. Statement(s) given as evidence
strong inductive argument
disjuctive syllogism
conclusion
premise
4. Any sentence that isn't contradictory
syllogism
invalid argument
satisfiable sentence
contingent sentence
5. A can stand on its own as a sentence apart from B
syllogism
component sentence
implication
contradictory statement
6. Invalid argument in which if the premises are all true - they provide good reason to think the conclusion will also be true
deductive argument
strong inductive argument
valid argument
invalid argument
7. Sentence A implies sentence B A's truth guarantees B's truth
disjuctive syllogism
equivalent argument
weak inductive argument
implication
8. Argument in which the truth of all of the premises doesn't guarantee the truths of the conclusion
syllogism
valid argument
equivalent argument
invalid argument
9. Argument in which if the premises are all true - then the conclusion must be true
valid argument
component sentence
equivalent argument
deductive argument
10. Either A or B. Not A. So - B. p v q - ~p - .'. q - 'We must go right or left. We can't go right - therefore we must go left.
component sentence
Modus tollens
logically true sentence
disjuctive syllogism
11. Isn't possibly false
argument
invalid argument
logically true sentence
logical operators
12. Valid argument with all true premises
sound argument
argument
invalid argument
inductive argument
13. If A and B are equivalent - then A implies B and B implies A (mutual implication)
deductive argument
equivalent argument
invalid argument
valid argument
14. If - then - and - or - not - if and only if - all - is. Watch for freestanding assertions vs. arguments.
valid argument
compound sentence
logically true sentence
logical operators
15. If P then Q - not-Q therefore not-P - Note: beware of Q being a negative (e.g. - can't)
Modus tollens
compound sentence
syllogism
invalid argument
16. Sentences where one or more are given as evidence or support for another
argument
sound argument
logical operators
satisfiable sentence
17. Premises don't support truth of conclusions
weak inductive argument
deductive argument
equivalent argument
valid argument
18. An argument such that the truth of its premises makes the conclusion more or less 'probable' (but not certain).
contradictory statement
logically true sentence
inductive argument
Modus ponens
19. An argument incorporating the claim that it is impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true.
conclusion
deductive argument
weak inductive argument
compound sentence
20. If P then Q - P therefore Q
Modus tollens
disjuctive syllogism
strong inductive argument
Modus ponens
21. Sentence that is possibly true or false
syllogism
sound argument
contingent sentence
logical operators
22. Isn't possibly true
Modus ponens
premise
Modus tollens
contradictory statement
23. A deductive type of formal logic that presents two premises that inevitably lead to a sound conclusion. A=B - B=C - so A=C. 'All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore - Socrates is mortal.' Ex: Major premise: All M are P. Minor premise: All S
implication
inductive argument
syllogism
component sentence