SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Behavioral Science
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
health-sciences
Instructions:
Answer 40 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Capitation
Researches belief in the outcome effects the outcome - vs Subjects realize they're being studied so they change their behavior
Best payment method for preventative care
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
2. t-test vs ANOVA vs chi
3. Odds ratio equation
Researches belief in the outcome effects the outcome - vs Subjects realize they're being studied so they change their behavior
Ad/bc
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
4. Reliability=
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
Precision - Consistent and reproducible
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
Alpha vs beta - FP vs FN - There is a difference when there really isn't vs There isn't a difference when there really is
5. P value vs power (1-beta) determine them - Power
If odds ratio or relative risk cross 1 - If two groups overlap
Info gathered at a bad time - Ex. Survey of fatal dz (only those alive answer)
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
6. Latent period bias
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
Those in different groups aren't treated the same
Disease (+ or -)
Spouse>children>parents
7. Confidence interval confirms H0
Alpha vs beta - FP vs FN - There is a difference when there really isn't vs There isn't a difference when there really is
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
Take people who have a dz - see what RFs there were vs take people with RFs - see if they develop a dz - Odds ratio vs relative risk - Retrospective vs observational
If odds ratio or relative risk cross 1 - If two groups overlap
8. Where does most abnl actions in sleep occur?
Best payment method for preventative care
Mean +/- 2(SEM)
Stage 3
Disease (+ or -)
9. Waves of sleep
1/absolute risk reduction
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
Picking neighbors for controls and such
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
10. Random vs systematic error
Researches belief in the outcome effects the outcome - vs Subjects realize they're being studied so they change their behavior
Best payment method for preventative care
Reduces precision vs reduces accuracy
Precision - Consistent and reproducible
11. Late-look bias
Elderly - vs Destitute
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
Info gathered at a bad time - Ex. Survey of fatal dz (only those alive answer)
Spouse>children>parents
12. Absolute risk reduction equation
[a/(a+c)] - [c/(c+d)]
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
Risk without tx minus risk with tx
Ad/bc
13. NTs in REM sleep
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
Disease (+ or -)
5 steps - hallucinations - delusions - >2 months is abnormal
ACh increases it - NE reduces REM
14. Surrogate hierarchy
Spouse>children>parents
[a/(a+c)] - [c/(c+d)]
Stage 3
1-Assess toxicity - safety. Healthy volunteers - 2-Assess dosing - SEs - 3-Huge number of people to compare it to the current standard of care - 4-Long term SEs
15. Pygmalian vs Hawthorne effect
16. Attributable risk equation
ACh increases it - NE reduces REM
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
Ad/bc
[a/(a+c)] - [c/(c+d)]
17. Case-control vs cohort study
1-Assess toxicity - safety. Healthy volunteers - 2-Assess dosing - SEs - 3-Huge number of people to compare it to the current standard of care - 4-Long term SEs
Take people who have a dz - see what RFs there were vs take people with RFs - see if they develop a dz - Odds ratio vs relative risk - Retrospective vs observational
1/attributable risk
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
18. MedicarE vs medicaid
Those in different groups aren't treated the same
Elderly - vs Destitute
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
19. Emancipation of a minor
Ad/bc
Info gathered at a bad time - Ex. Survey of fatal dz (only those alive answer)
Elderly - vs Destitute
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
20. 12 month milestones
=SD/sqrt(n)
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
21. Positive vs negative skew
Take people who have a dz - see what RFs there were vs take people with RFs - see if they develop a dz - Odds ratio vs relative risk - Retrospective vs observational
Hump moves left vs right - Mean>median>mode vs Mean<median<mode
1/absolute risk reduction
Take data from everyone to get info like prevalence - risks - etc.
22. Type I vs Type II error (including how you decrease the probability of getting them)
23. Phases of clinical trials
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
1-Assess toxicity - safety. Healthy volunteers - 2-Assess dosing - SEs - 3-Huge number of people to compare it to the current standard of care - 4-Long term SEs
Researches belief in the outcome effects the outcome - vs Subjects realize they're being studied so they change their behavior
24. Depression sleep patterns
Picking neighbors for controls and such
Feeds self - tricycle - gender identity - toilet trained - sentences
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
Alpha vs beta - FP vs FN - There is a difference when there really isn't vs There isn't a difference when there really is
25. Number needed to harm equation
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
1/absolute risk reduction
1/attributable risk
26. Null vs alternative hypothesis
Nonrandom assignment to study group - vs - Subjects not a good representation of the public
ACh increases it - NE reduces REM
H0 vs H1 - There is no association vs there is an association
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
27. Selection vs sampling bias
1-Assess toxicity - safety. Healthy volunteers - 2-Assess dosing - SEs - 3-Huge number of people to compare it to the current standard of care - 4-Long term SEs
Picking neighbors for controls and such
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
Nonrandom assignment to study group - vs - Subjects not a good representation of the public
28. BMI equation - levels
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
Kg/m^2 - <18.5=underweight - 18.5-25=good - 25-30=overweight - 30-40=obese - 40+=morbidly obese
Take data from everyone to get info like prevalence - risks - etc.
If odds ratio or relative risk cross 1 - If two groups overlap
29. Confidence interval equation (95%)
Those in different groups aren't treated the same
1/attributable risk
Mean +/- 2(SEM)
H0 vs H1 - There is no association vs there is an association
30. 3 yr milestones
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
Picking neighbors for controls and such
Feeds self - tricycle - gender identity - toilet trained - sentences
Ad/bc
31. Relative risk equation
Info gathered at a bad time - Ex. Survey of fatal dz (only those alive answer)
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
Stage 3
32. Effect modification
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
Take data from everyone to get info like prevalence - risks - etc.
33. 1st vs 2nd tests in determining a patient having dz
Those in different groups aren't treated the same
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
Researches belief in the outcome effects the outcome - vs Subjects realize they're being studied so they change their behavior
Info gathered at a bad time - Ex. Survey of fatal dz (only those alive answer)
34. Grief sx - timeline
5 steps - hallucinations - delusions - >2 months is abnormal
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
Researches belief in the outcome effects the outcome - vs Subjects realize they're being studied so they change their behavior
Picking neighbors for controls and such
35. Number needed to treat equation
1/absolute risk reduction
If odds ratio or relative risk cross 1 - If two groups overlap
Those in different groups aren't treated the same
Best payment method for preventative care
36. SEM=
1-Assess toxicity - safety. Healthy volunteers - 2-Assess dosing - SEs - 3-Huge number of people to compare it to the current standard of care - 4-Long term SEs
Picking neighbors for controls and such
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
=SD/sqrt(n)
37. Cross-sectional study
5 steps - hallucinations - delusions - >2 months is abnormal
Take data from everyone to get info like prevalence - risks - etc.
1/absolute risk reduction
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
38. For the 2x2 - always put ? on top
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
Disease (+ or -)
Stage 3
Spouse>children>parents
39. Procedure bias
40. Matching
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
Picking neighbors for controls and such
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
1-Assess toxicity - safety. Healthy volunteers - 2-Assess dosing - SEs - 3-Huge number of people to compare it to the current standard of care - 4-Long term SEs