SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Behavioral Science
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
health-sciences
Instructions:
Answer 40 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Case-control vs cohort study
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
Mean +/- 2(SEM)
Take people who have a dz - see what RFs there were vs take people with RFs - see if they develop a dz - Odds ratio vs relative risk - Retrospective vs observational
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
2. Pygmalian vs Hawthorne effect
3. MedicarE vs medicaid
Elderly - vs Destitute
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
1/attributable risk
4. Absolute risk reduction equation
Risk without tx minus risk with tx
H0 vs H1 - There is no association vs there is an association
Picking neighbors for controls and such
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
5. Procedure bias
6. Reliability=
Precision - Consistent and reproducible
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
Those in different groups aren't treated the same
Take data from everyone to get info like prevalence - risks - etc.
7. t-test vs ANOVA vs chi
8. P value vs power (1-beta) determine them - Power
1/absolute risk reduction
If odds ratio or relative risk cross 1 - If two groups overlap
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
9. Capitation
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
5 steps - hallucinations - delusions - >2 months is abnormal
[a/(a+c)] - [c/(c+d)]
Best payment method for preventative care
10. 3 yr milestones
Feeds self - tricycle - gender identity - toilet trained - sentences
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
Stage 3
Researches belief in the outcome effects the outcome - vs Subjects realize they're being studied so they change their behavior
11. Attributable risk equation
Reduces precision vs reduces accuracy
[a/(a+c)] - [c/(c+d)]
Stage 3
Risk without tx minus risk with tx
12. Waves of sleep
Stage 3
H0 vs H1 - There is no association vs there is an association
Nonrandom assignment to study group - vs - Subjects not a good representation of the public
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
13. Latent period bias
Elderly - vs Destitute
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
Stage 3
14. Matching
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
Kg/m^2 - <18.5=underweight - 18.5-25=good - 25-30=overweight - 30-40=obese - 40+=morbidly obese
Picking neighbors for controls and such
Those in different groups aren't treated the same
15. Random vs systematic error
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
Spouse>children>parents
Reduces precision vs reduces accuracy
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
16. Selection vs sampling bias
Nonrandom assignment to study group - vs - Subjects not a good representation of the public
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
1-Assess toxicity - safety. Healthy volunteers - 2-Assess dosing - SEs - 3-Huge number of people to compare it to the current standard of care - 4-Long term SEs
Kg/m^2 - <18.5=underweight - 18.5-25=good - 25-30=overweight - 30-40=obese - 40+=morbidly obese
17. Type I vs Type II error (including how you decrease the probability of getting them)
18. 12 month milestones
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
=SD/sqrt(n)
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
Best payment method for preventative care
19. For the 2x2 - always put ? on top
Precision - Consistent and reproducible
Alpha vs beta - FP vs FN - There is a difference when there really isn't vs There isn't a difference when there really is
Elderly - vs Destitute
Disease (+ or -)
20. BMI equation - levels
Info gathered at a bad time - Ex. Survey of fatal dz (only those alive answer)
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
Take people who have a dz - see what RFs there were vs take people with RFs - see if they develop a dz - Odds ratio vs relative risk - Retrospective vs observational
Kg/m^2 - <18.5=underweight - 18.5-25=good - 25-30=overweight - 30-40=obese - 40+=morbidly obese
21. Number needed to treat equation
Feeds self - tricycle - gender identity - toilet trained - sentences
Researches belief in the outcome effects the outcome - vs Subjects realize they're being studied so they change their behavior
Elderly - vs Destitute
1/absolute risk reduction
22. Confidence interval confirms H0
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
Risk without tx minus risk with tx
If odds ratio or relative risk cross 1 - If two groups overlap
23. Confidence interval equation (95%)
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
Mean +/- 2(SEM)
ACh increases it - NE reduces REM
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
24. Positive vs negative skew
Hump moves left vs right - Mean>median>mode vs Mean<median<mode
Elderly - vs Destitute
Info gathered at a bad time - Ex. Survey of fatal dz (only those alive answer)
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
25. Null vs alternative hypothesis
Difference between 2 means - vs - Difference between 3+ means - vs - Difference between things that aren't means
Reduces precision vs reduces accuracy
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
H0 vs H1 - There is no association vs there is an association
26. Where does most abnl actions in sleep occur?
Alpha vs beta - FP vs FN - There is a difference when there really isn't vs There isn't a difference when there really is
Stage 3
Difference between 2 means - vs - Difference between 3+ means - vs - Difference between things that aren't means
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
27. Phases of clinical trials
Alpha vs beta - FP vs FN - There is a difference when there really isn't vs There isn't a difference when there really is
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
=SD/sqrt(n)
1-Assess toxicity - safety. Healthy volunteers - 2-Assess dosing - SEs - 3-Huge number of people to compare it to the current standard of care - 4-Long term SEs
28. Surrogate hierarchy
Reduces precision vs reduces accuracy
Spouse>children>parents
Picking neighbors for controls and such
[a/(a+c)] - [c/(c+d)]
29. Relative risk equation
1/attributable risk
Kg/m^2 - <18.5=underweight - 18.5-25=good - 25-30=overweight - 30-40=obese - 40+=morbidly obese
Disease (+ or -)
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
30. Emancipation of a minor
Nonrandom assignment to study group - vs - Subjects not a good representation of the public
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
Alpha vs beta - FP vs FN - There is a difference when there really isn't vs There isn't a difference when there really is
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
31. Number needed to harm equation
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
Mean +/- 2(SEM)
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
1/attributable risk
32. NTs in REM sleep
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
ACh increases it - NE reduces REM
Hump moves left vs right - Mean>median>mode vs Mean<median<mode
H0 vs H1 - There is no association vs there is an association
33. Late-look bias
5 steps - hallucinations - delusions - >2 months is abnormal
Info gathered at a bad time - Ex. Survey of fatal dz (only those alive answer)
Disease (+ or -)
Kg/m^2 - <18.5=underweight - 18.5-25=good - 25-30=overweight - 30-40=obese - 40+=morbidly obese
34. Effect modification
=SD/sqrt(n)
1/attributable risk
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
35. Grief sx - timeline
Mean +/- 2(SEM)
5 steps - hallucinations - delusions - >2 months is abnormal
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
36. Odds ratio equation
Ad/bc
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
Hump moves left vs right - Mean>median>mode vs Mean<median<mode
Stage 3
37. SEM=
Stage 3
Hump moves left vs right - Mean>median>mode vs Mean<median<mode
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
=SD/sqrt(n)
38. Depression sleep patterns
1-Assess toxicity - safety. Healthy volunteers - 2-Assess dosing - SEs - 3-Huge number of people to compare it to the current standard of care - 4-Long term SEs
Spouse>children>parents
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
39. Cross-sectional study
Picking neighbors for controls and such
=SD/sqrt(n)
Take data from everyone to get info like prevalence - risks - etc.
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
40. 1st vs 2nd tests in determining a patient having dz
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
Elderly - vs Destitute
1-Assess toxicity - safety. Healthy volunteers - 2-Assess dosing - SEs - 3-Huge number of people to compare it to the current standard of care - 4-Long term SEs