SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Behavioral Science
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
health-sciences
Instructions:
Answer 40 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. SEM=
Take data from everyone to get info like prevalence - risks - etc.
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
=SD/sqrt(n)
2. Effect modification
Alpha vs beta - FP vs FN - There is a difference when there really isn't vs There isn't a difference when there really is
ACh increases it - NE reduces REM
Disease (+ or -)
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
3. Grief sx - timeline
Precision - Consistent and reproducible
Difference between 2 means - vs - Difference between 3+ means - vs - Difference between things that aren't means
Alpha vs beta - FP vs FN - There is a difference when there really isn't vs There isn't a difference when there really is
5 steps - hallucinations - delusions - >2 months is abnormal
4. Surrogate hierarchy
Mean +/- 2(SEM)
1/absolute risk reduction
Spouse>children>parents
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
5. Relative risk equation
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
1/absolute risk reduction
Reduces precision vs reduces accuracy
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
6. t-test vs ANOVA vs chi
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
7. Type I vs Type II error (including how you decrease the probability of getting them)
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
8. Depression sleep patterns
Disease (+ or -)
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
Kg/m^2 - <18.5=underweight - 18.5-25=good - 25-30=overweight - 30-40=obese - 40+=morbidly obese
5 steps - hallucinations - delusions - >2 months is abnormal
9. Number needed to treat equation
1/absolute risk reduction
Researches belief in the outcome effects the outcome - vs Subjects realize they're being studied so they change their behavior
Mean +/- 2(SEM)
1/attributable risk
10. Where does most abnl actions in sleep occur?
Picking neighbors for controls and such
Stage 3
Researches belief in the outcome effects the outcome - vs Subjects realize they're being studied so they change their behavior
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
11. Selection vs sampling bias
Nonrandom assignment to study group - vs - Subjects not a good representation of the public
Risk without tx minus risk with tx
Ad/bc
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
12. Latent period bias
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
Reduces precision vs reduces accuracy
1/absolute risk reduction
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
13. Emancipation of a minor
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
1/absolute risk reduction
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
14. Waves of sleep
Risk without tx minus risk with tx
1/absolute risk reduction
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
15. Absolute risk reduction equation
Disease (+ or -)
1/attributable risk
Risk without tx minus risk with tx
1/absolute risk reduction
16. Number needed to harm equation
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
Researches belief in the outcome effects the outcome - vs Subjects realize they're being studied so they change their behavior
1/attributable risk
17. Null vs alternative hypothesis
H0 vs H1 - There is no association vs there is an association
Risk without tx minus risk with tx
Best payment method for preventative care
Precision - Consistent and reproducible
18. Matching
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
Kg/m^2 - <18.5=underweight - 18.5-25=good - 25-30=overweight - 30-40=obese - 40+=morbidly obese
Spouse>children>parents
Picking neighbors for controls and such
19. NTs in REM sleep
[a/(a+c)] - [c/(c+d)]
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
ACh increases it - NE reduces REM
20. Confidence interval equation (95%)
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
Nonrandom assignment to study group - vs - Subjects not a good representation of the public
Mean +/- 2(SEM)
Kg/m^2 - <18.5=underweight - 18.5-25=good - 25-30=overweight - 30-40=obese - 40+=morbidly obese
21. Positive vs negative skew
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
Hump moves left vs right - Mean>median>mode vs Mean<median<mode
Take data from everyone to get info like prevalence - risks - etc.
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
22. Late-look bias
1/attributable risk
Kg/m^2 - <18.5=underweight - 18.5-25=good - 25-30=overweight - 30-40=obese - 40+=morbidly obese
Info gathered at a bad time - Ex. Survey of fatal dz (only those alive answer)
Mean +/- 2(SEM)
23. Phases of clinical trials
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
Risk without tx minus risk with tx
1-Assess toxicity - safety. Healthy volunteers - 2-Assess dosing - SEs - 3-Huge number of people to compare it to the current standard of care - 4-Long term SEs
24. For the 2x2 - always put ? on top
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
Disease (+ or -)
Info gathered at a bad time - Ex. Survey of fatal dz (only those alive answer)
25. Random vs systematic error
Mean +/- 2(SEM)
Increased REM - Faster entrance to REM - Repeated awakenings
Reduces precision vs reduces accuracy
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
26. Confidence interval confirms H0
H0 vs H1 - There is no association vs there is an association
ACh increases it - NE reduces REM
Feeds self - tricycle - gender identity - toilet trained - sentences
If odds ratio or relative risk cross 1 - If two groups overlap
27. 1st vs 2nd tests in determining a patient having dz
H0 vs H1 - There is no association vs there is an association
Picking neighbors for controls and such
Take people who have a dz - see what RFs there were vs take people with RFs - see if they develop a dz - Odds ratio vs relative risk - Retrospective vs observational
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
28. BMI equation - levels
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
Spouse>children>parents
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
Kg/m^2 - <18.5=underweight - 18.5-25=good - 25-30=overweight - 30-40=obese - 40+=morbidly obese
29. Case-control vs cohort study
Take people who have a dz - see what RFs there were vs take people with RFs - see if they develop a dz - Odds ratio vs relative risk - Retrospective vs observational
Difference between 2 means - vs - Difference between 3+ means - vs - Difference between things that aren't means
ACh increases it - NE reduces REM
[a/(a+c)] - [c/(c+d)]
30. Pygmalian vs Hawthorne effect
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
31. Attributable risk equation
Reduces precision vs reduces accuracy
1-Assess toxicity - safety. Healthy volunteers - 2-Assess dosing - SEs - 3-Huge number of people to compare it to the current standard of care - 4-Long term SEs
[a/(a+c)] - [c/(c+d)]
Best payment method for preventative care
32. MedicarE vs medicaid
Elderly - vs Destitute
You catch the confounding error. Not a bias
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
Researches belief in the outcome effects the outcome - vs Subjects realize they're being studied so they change their behavior
33. Cross-sectional study
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
Risk without tx minus risk with tx
Take data from everyone to get info like prevalence - risks - etc.
34. P value vs power (1-beta) determine them - Power
Marriage - Self-supporting - Has children - Military - Emergencies - OCPs - STDs - pregnancy - drugs
Hump moves left vs right - Mean>median>mode vs Mean<median<mode
Kg/m^2 - <18.5=underweight - 18.5-25=good - 25-30=overweight - 30-40=obese - 40+=morbidly obese
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
35. Capitation
1st-Rule out. High sensitivity (SNOUT) - 2nd-Rule in. High specificity (SPIN)
Best payment method for preventative care
H0 vs H1 - There is no association vs there is an association
Info gathered at a bad time - Ex. Survey of fatal dz (only those alive answer)
36. Procedure bias
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
37. 12 month milestones
Walking - separation anxiety - understand 25% of what he says
Stage 3
Need a certain amount of time before the result surfaces
Picking neighbors for controls and such
38. Reliability=
Risk without tx minus risk with tx
Precision - Consistent and reproducible
Awake=beta - Stage 1=theta - Stage 2=spindles - K complexes - Stage 3=delta (widest with tallest amplitudes) - Stage 4/REM=beta
1-beta - Probability of finding the difference when there is one (aka not getting Type II error)
39. 3 yr milestones
Feeds self - tricycle - gender identity - toilet trained - sentences
Take people who have a dz - see what RFs there were vs take people with RFs - see if they develop a dz - Odds ratio vs relative risk - Retrospective vs observational
Precision - Consistent and reproducible
[a/(a+c)] - [c/(c+d)]
40. Odds ratio equation
Info gathered at a bad time - Ex. Survey of fatal dz (only those alive answer)
Ad/bc
[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]
Take data from everyone to get info like prevalence - risks - etc.