SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Civil Rights And Civil Liberties Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Supreme Court decision holding that a state university could not admit less qualified individuals solely because of their race.
Gitlow v NY - 1925
Dennis v US - 1951
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Equal Access Act
2. Identified an implied right to privacy in the U.S. Constitution using the 1st - 3rd - 4th - 5th - and 9th amendment. Hint: This case involved birth control and married couples... relate this somehow to the Griswold family vacation movies?
Engel v. Vitale
Griswold v Connecticut - 1965
Lukumi Babalu Aye v City of Hialeah
New York Times v US - 1971
3. Defined the power of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) over 'indecent' material as applied to broadcasting; some kid over heard Filthy Words routine on TV - so the dad sued. [obscenity]
Smith v. Oregon
Miranda v Arizona - 1966
Reno v ACLU - 1997
FCC v Pacifica - 1978
4. Decision that limited the application of the Bill of Rights to the actions of Congress alone.
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Gitlow v. New York
Sherbert v Verner
Barron v. Baltimore
5. Evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights is sometimes inadmissible for a criminal prosecution in a court of law.
exclusionary rule
Grutter v. Bollinger
Texas v Johnson - 1989
Mapp v. Ohio
6. Limitation on the scope of Tinker ruling. prohibiting certain styles of expression that are sexually vulgar.
Abrams v US - 1919
House v. Bell
Bethel ISD v Fraser
Mueller v Allen - 1983
7. Incorporated the free speech clause of the First Amendment - ruling that the states were not completely free to limit forms of political expression.
Gitlow v. New York
Near v Minnesota - 1931
Lawrence v. Texas
Smith v. Oregon
8. When a government operates a 'limited public forum -' it may not discriminate against speech that takes place within that forum on the basis of the viewpoint it expresses—in this case - against religious speech engaged in by an evangelical Christian
Weeks v US - 1914
Barron v. Baltimore
Good News Club v. Milford Central School
McCarthy Hearings - 1950s
9. Paying legislative chaplains and opening a legislative body with a prayer does not violate the establishment clause. (Long standing tradition - they're adults) [exception to lemon v. kurtzman]
Brown v. Board of Education
Marsh v Chambers - 1983
Gitlow v NY - 1925
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
10. In upholding several restrictive abortion regulations - the Court opened the door for state governments to enact new restrictions on abortion.
Reno v ACLU - 1997
Sedition Act - 1918
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
Wisconsin v Yoder
11. Extended 1981 ruling to high schools for use of facilities by religious groups after hours [est. clause and schools]
Equal Access Act
House v. Bell
DeJonge v. Oregon
Griswold v Connecticut - 1965
12. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Oregon v Smith
Wolf v Colorado
Roth v. US
Santa Fe ISD v Doe
13. The Court ruled that a redistricting plan in Texas did not intentionally limit Latino representation.
DeJonge v. Oregon
Tinker v Des Moines ISD - 1969
Gonzales v. Carhart
LULAC v. Perry
14. The Court concluded that St. Paul - Minnesota's Bias-Motivated Crime Ordinance violated the First Amendment because it regulated speech based on the content of the speech.
are.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
Plessy v. Ferguson
Mapp v. Ohio
Furman v Georgia - 1972
15. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
Symbolic Speech
New York Times v Sullivan - 1964
Wisconsin v Yoder
Maryland v. Craig
16. The Court ruled that the use of the swastika is a symbolic form of free speech entitled to First Amendment protections and determined that the swastika itself did not constitute 'fighting words.' [symbolic speech]
National Socialist Party of America v Skokie - 1977
Stenberg v. Carhart
Wallace v Jaffree
Tinker v. Des Moines
17. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Smith Act 1940
Smith v. Oregon
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Texas v Johnson - 1989
18. The Court ruled that the recitation in public classrooms of a non-denominational prayer was unconstitutional and a violation of the establishment clause.
Texas v Johnson - 1989
Engel v. Vitale
Smith v. Oregon
Bowers v. Hardwick
19. Peyote smoking member of native american church denied unemployment compensation [Free exercise]
Miller v. California
Oregon v Smith
US v. Miller
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
20. On this appeal of the 1987 McCleskey case - the Court produced new standards designed to make it much more difficult for death-row inmates to file repeated appeals.
US v. Miller
New York TImes Co. v. US
McCleskey v. Zant
Smith v. Oregon
21. The Court ruled that an all-male jury did not violate a woman's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
are.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
Minersville ISD v Gobitis
Marsh v Chambers - 1983
Hoyt v. Florida
22. Concluded that a defendant did not have a First Amendment right to free speech against the draft during World War I. Charles Schenck was the Secretary of the Socialist party and was responsible for printing - distributing - and mailing 15000 leaflets
Romer v. Evans
Reed v. Reed
Schenck v US - 1919
Near v. Minnesota
23. Granted indigents the right to counsel
WVA Board of Ed. v Barnette
Brown v. Board of Education II
Gideon v. Wainwright
US v. Miller
24. Court ruled that laws banning animal sacrifice were unconstitutional because they targeted the Santeria religion specifically.
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
Mapp v Ohio
Smith v. Oregon
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart
25. You may believe whatever you wish - but you may not be able to exercise that belief.
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Free Exercise Act
Miller v. California
Lukumi Babalu Aye v City of Hialeah
26. By ruling that a state law violated the freedom of the press - the Supreme Court incorporated the free press provision of the First Amendment.
Near v. Minnesota
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
Smith v. Oregon
Abrams v US - 1919
27. The Supreme Court - however - held that the ordinances were neither neutral nor generally applicable: rather - they applied exclusively to the church. Because the law was targeted at Santera
Lukumi Babalu Aye v City of Hialeah
Stenberg v. Carhart
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
Equal Access Act
28. The Court found that a San Francisco law banning cleaners from operating in wooden buildings violated the Fourteenth Amendment in its application
New York Times v Sullivan - 1964
Yates v US - 1957
Gonzales v. Oregon
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
29. Supreme Court case that established the Constitution's implied right to privacy. (Birth control case)
NJ v TLO
Griswold v. Connecticut
Good News Club v. Milford Central School
Santa Fe ISD v Doe
30. The Supreme Court said that the Second Amendment protects a pre-existing - private - individually-held right - to keep arms and to bear arms - without regard to a person's relationship to a militia.
Gideon v Wainwright - 1963
Gonzales v. Oregon
Mapp v Ohio
Heller vs. DC - 2008
31. Selectively incorporates freedom of the press -The Court ruled that a Minnesota law that targeted publishers of 'malicious' or 'scandalous' newspapers violated the First Amendment
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
Gideon v. Wainwright
Near v Minnesota - 1931
NJ v TLO
32. Supreme court decision holding that school segregation is inherently unconstitutional because it violates the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection; marked the end of legal segregation in the US.
Reno v ACLU - 1997
Barron v. Baltimore
Brown v. Board of Education
Reynolds v US
33. The last time the Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of the Second Amendment; ruled that the amendment was only intended to protect a citizen's right to own ordinary militia weapons.
Griswold v. Connecticut
US v. Miller
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart
McCleskey v. Zant
34. Follow-up to Brown v. Board of Education - this case laid out the process for school desegregation and established the concept of dismantling systems 'with all deliberate speed.'
Minersville ISD v Gobitis
McCleskey v. Zant
Brown v. Board of Education II
are.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
35. This Act prescribed fines up to $10000 and prison up to 20 yrs for a variety of loosely defined antiwar activities. [free speech]
Free Exercise Act
FCC v Pacifica - 1978
Goss v Lopez
Espionage Act - 1917
36. The objectives of the military allow it to restrict the religious rights of individuals in the interest of cohesiveness. The Court did not endeavor to assess the military's claims concerning the importance of regulating the appearance of its members.
Gitlow v. New York
Barron v. Baltimore
Hernandez v. Texas
Goldman v Weinberger
37. The Court overturned the conviction of a director of a Communist youth camp under a state statute prohibiting the display of a red flag.
Schenck v US - 1919
Gonzales v. Oregon
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
Stromberg v. California
38. Established the actual malice standard. In cases of libel or slander - public figures must prove that the author had 'knowledge of falsity and reckless disregard for the truth.'
Griswold v. Connecticut
Griswold v Connecticut - 1965
Palko v. Connecticut
New York Times v Sullivan - 1964
39. You can burn the flag [symbolic speech]
Goss v Lopez
Symbolic Speech
are.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
Texas v Johnson - 1989
40. Supreme Court decision that said it was unconstitutional to keep Mexican-Americans off of juries.
Weeks v. US
Hernandez v. Texas
Wallace v Jaffree
Reynolds v US
41. The confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment does not guarantee defendants an absolute right to come face to face with their accusers.
Heller vs. DC - 2008
Maryland v. Craig
Barron v. Baltimore
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
42. Public schools may not have clergy lead prayers at graduation ceremonies [est. clause and schools]
Lee v Weisman
Wisconsin v Yoder
Mueller v Allen - 1983
Plessy v. Ferguson
43. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment required that government demonstrate a compelling government interest before denying unemployment compensation to someone Who was fired b
Griswold v Connecticut - 1965
Sherbert v Verner
Sedition Act - 1918
Wallace v Jaffree
44. Established exclusionary rule [4th amendment]; Fremont Weeks was suspected of using the mail system to distribute chances in a lottery - which was considered gambling and was illegal in Missouri. State agents entered his home - searched his room - an
Gonzales v. Oregon
Griswold v Connecticut - 1965
Brown v. Board of Education II
Weeks v US - 1914
45. Death penalty is not 'cruel and unusual punishment' in cases of murder [8th]
Hoyt v. Florida
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
Gregg v Georgia - 1976
US v. Miller
46. A landmark case in the area of U.S. criminal procedure - in which the United States Supreme Court decided that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment protection against 'unreasonable searches and seizures' may not be used in criminal
Abington SD v Schempp
Mapp v Ohio
LULAC v. Perry
Yates v US - 1957
47. The Court ruled that a Nebraska 'partial birth' abortion statute was unconstitutionally vague and unenforceable - calling into question the laws of twenty-nine other states.
National Socialist Party of America v Skokie - 1977
Stenberg v. Carhart
Miller v. California
Roe v. Wade
48. Peremptory challenges cannot be used to exclude all people of a given race (in this case - African Americans) from a jury pool.
Religious Freedom Restoration Act - 1993
Furman v. Georgia
Batson v. Kentucky
Brandenburg v. Ohio
49. Illegal to discuss overthrowing the government [free speech]
Grutter v. Bollinger
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
Lukumi Babalu Aye v City of Hialeah
Smith Act 1940
50. The Court fashioned the direct incitement test for deciding whether certain kinds of speech could be regulated by the government. This test holds that advocacy of illegal action is protected by the First Amendment unless imminent action is intended a
Brandenburg v Ohio - 1969
WVA Board of Ed. v Barnette
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Cantwell v Connecticut