SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Civil Rights And Civil Liberties Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found [8th]
Engle v Vitale
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
Furman v Georgia - 1972
Sedition Act - 1918
2. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY - 1925
Wolf v Colorado
Barron v. Baltimore
Miranda v. Arizona
3. The Court overturned the conviction of a director of a Communist youth camp under a state statute prohibiting the display of a red flag.
Stromberg v. California
Heller vs. DC - 2008
Free Exercise Act
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
4. The Court ruled that a redistricting plan in Texas did not intentionally limit Latino representation.
Religious Freedom Restoration Act - 1993
Oregon v Smith
LULAC v. Perry
Cooper v. Aaron
5. Declared that a work is obscene and may be regulated by the gov if work taken as a whole appeals to prurient interests - work portrays sexual conduct in a patently offensive way and work taken as a whole lacks literary - artistic - political or scien
Richmond Newspapers v Virginia - 1978
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg School District
Engel v. Vitale
Miller v. California
6. Paying legislative chaplains and opening a legislative body with a prayer does not violate the establishment clause. (Long standing tradition - they're adults) [exception to lemon v. kurtzman]
Alien Sedition Acts
New York TImes Co. v. US
Marsh v Chambers - 1983
Weeks v. US
7. A landmark case in the area of U.S. criminal procedure - in which the United States Supreme Court decided that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment protection against 'unreasonable searches and seizures' may not be used in criminal
Mapp v. Ohio
Free Exercise Act
Mapp v Ohio
Gideon v. Wainwright
8. Mandatory prayer in schools is a violation of the establishment clause
Engle v Vitale
US v. Miller
exclusionary rule
Lukumi Babalu Aye v City of Hialeah
9. Prior restraint case; the Court ruled that a trial judge could not prohibit the publication or broadcast of information about a murder trial.
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
US v. Williams
Griswold v Connecticut - 1965
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart
10. Established exclusionary rule [4th amendment]; Fremont Weeks was suspected of using the mail system to distribute chances in a lottery - which was considered gambling and was illegal in Missouri. State agents entered his home - searched his room - an
Schenck v. US
Reynolds v US
House v. Bell
Weeks v US - 1914
11. Case wherein the Court broke with tradition and issued a unanimous decision against the Little Rock School Board - ruling that the district's evasive schemes to avoid the Brown II decision were illegal.
Cooper v. Aaron
Furman v. Georgia
Reed v. Reed
NJ v TLO
12. Court made it illegal to send or receive images online that are indistinguishable from that of a minor in a sexual act.
US v. Williams
National Socialist Party of America v Skokie - 1977
Abrams v US - 1919
Near v Minnesota - 1931
13. In this case - the Court ruled that the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was not unconstitutional.
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Korematsu v. US
Texas v Johnson - 1989
Marsh v Chambers - 1983
14. The Court ruled that the use of the swastika is a symbolic form of free speech entitled to First Amendment protections and determined that the swastika itself did not constitute 'fighting words.' [symbolic speech]
National Socialist Party of America v Skokie - 1977
US v. Miller
Gregg v Georgia - 1976
US v O'Brien - 1969
15. Students may be searched by school administrators if they have reasonable belief---this is a lower standard than probable cause.
Mapp v Ohio
NJ v TLO
House v. Bell
Miller v. California
16. Court ruled that laws banning animal sacrifice were unconstitutional because they targeted the Santeria religion specifically.
Mapp v Ohio
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
Muller v. Oregon
New York Times v US - 1971
17. Supreme Court case that established the Constitution's implied right to privacy. (Birth control case)
Weeks v. US
Craig v. Boren
Griswold v. Connecticut
Lemon v. Kurtzman
18. Supreme Court ruling that simply publishing a defamatory falsehood is not enough to justify a libel judgment. 'Actual malice' must be proved to support a finding of libel against a public figure.
Marsh v Chambers - 1983
Hoyt v. Florida
Tinker v Des Moines ISD - 1969
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
19. Overturning Furman v. Georgia - the case ruled that Georgia's rewritten death penalty statute is constitutional.
Gregg v. Georgia
Bowers v. Hardwick
Marsh v Chambers - 1983
Plessy v. Ferguson
20. All defendants must be informed of legal rights before they are arrested [5th]
Reynolds v US
Sedition Act - 1918
McCarthy Hearings - 1950s
Miranda v Arizona - 1966
21. Limitation on the scope of Tinker ruling. prohibiting certain styles of expression that are sexually vulgar.
Bethel ISD v Fraser
Miranda v. Arizona
Lemon v. Kurtzman
WVA Board of Ed. v Barnette
22. Established the Supreme Court's rationale for distinguishing between protected and unprotected speech. Fighting words
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
are.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
Religious Freedom Restoration Act - 1993
Maryland v. Craig
23. Concluded that a defendant did not have a First Amendment right to free speech against the draft during World War I. Charles Schenck was the Secretary of the Socialist party and was responsible for printing - distributing - and mailing 15000 leaflets
Brown v. Board of Education II
Stromberg v. California
Near v Minnesota - 1931
Schenck v US - 1919
24. The objectives of the military allow it to restrict the religious rights of individuals in the interest of cohesiveness. The Court did not endeavor to assess the military's claims concerning the importance of regulating the appearance of its members.
Texas v Johnson - 1989
McCarthy Hearings - 1950s
Goldman v Weinberger
Stromberg v. California
25. Incorporated the First Amendment's right to freedom of assembly.
Roe v. Wade
Good News Club v. Milford Central School
DeJonge v. Oregon
Reed v. Reed
26. Ruled that the First Amendment protected radical and revolutionary speech - unless it posed a 'clear and present danger'. (overt action required) [Free Speech]
Hazelwood ISD v Kuhlmeir
Smith v. Oregon
Yates v US - 1957
Equal Access Act
27. The Court reversed its 1986 ruling in Bowers v. Hardwick by finding a Texas statute that banned sodomy to be unconstitutional.
Minersville ISD v Gobitis
Civil Rights Cases
Mapp v Ohio
Lawrence v. Texas
28. Evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights is sometimes inadmissible for a criminal prosecution in a court of law.
Santa Fe ISD v Doe
Mapp v. Ohio
Weeks v. US
exclusionary rule
29. Unsuccessful attempt to challenge Georgia's sodomy law. The case was overturned by Lawrence v. Texas.
Grutter v. Bollinger
Stenberg v. Carhart
Bowers v. Hardwick
Near v. Minnesota
30. Although the tests were searches under the Fourth Amendment - they were reasonable in light of the schools' interest in preventing teenage drug use.
Heller vs. DC - 2008
Vernonia ISD v Acton
Lukumi Babalu Aye v City of Hialeah
Good News Club v. Milford Central School
31. Announced that the public and the press have a First Amendment right to attend criminal trials.
Richmond Newspapers v Virginia - 1978
Stromberg v. California
LULAC v. Perry
Gregg v Georgia - 1976
32. Nonverbal communication - such as burning a flag or wearing an armband. The Supreme Court has accorded some symbolic speech protection under the first amendment.
Symbolic Speech
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
Abington SD v Schempp
Hazelwood ISD v Kuhlmeir
33. The Court ruled that public schools could compel students—in this case - Jehovah's Witnesses—to salute the American Flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance despite the students' religious objections to these practices. [Free exercise]
Minersville ISD v Gobitis
Gonzales v. Oregon
are.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
Lemon v. Kurtzman
34. Tightened restrictions on foreign-born Americans and limited speech [free speech]
Alien Sedition Acts
Mapp v Ohio
Minersville ISD v Gobitis
Miller v. California
35. States may provide school vouchers to parents that may use the money to attend religious school. [exception to lemon v. kurtzman]
Lawrence v. Texas
Schenck v. US
Brandenburg v Ohio - 1969
Mueller v Allen - 1983
36. The Court found that a San Francisco law banning cleaners from operating in wooden buildings violated the Fourteenth Amendment in its application
Hernandez v. Texas
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
Bowen v. Kendrick
Miller v. California
37. The Army accused chief counsel - Roy Cohn - of pressuring the Army to give preferential treatment to G. David Schine - Who was a former McCarthy aide and a friend of Cohn's. McCarthy counter-charged that this accusation was made in bad faith - in ret
Goss v Lopez
Religious Freedom Restoration Act - 1993
Miller v. California
McCarthy Hearings - 1950s
38. Identified an implied right to privacy in the U.S. Constitution using the 1st - 3rd - 4th - 5th - and 9th amendment. Hint: This case involved birth control and married couples... relate this somehow to the Griswold family vacation movies?
Griswold v Connecticut - 1965
Oregon v Smith
Gideon v. Wainwright
Tinker v Des Moines ISD - 1969
39. MALDEF failed to convince the Court that educational funds should be distributed equally among school districts.
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
Wolf v Colorado
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
Gonzales v. Carhart
40. Held that the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protected students from being forced to salute the American flag and say the Pledge of Allegiance in school. Overturned MinersvilleISD v Gobitis [Free exercise]
WVA Board of Ed. v Barnette
NJ v TLO
House v. Bell
Alien Sedition Acts
41. 'pentagon papers' executive efforts to prevent publication forbidden (Ellsburg & Vietnam)
New York Times v US - 1971
NJ v TLO
Near v. Minnesota
Santa Fe ISD v Doe
42. The Supreme Court ruled that all vestiges of de jure discrimination must be eliminated at once.
Lawrence v. Texas
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg School District
Bowen v. Kendrick
US v. Williams
43. The Court declared that a law banning peyote use was constitutional because it did not specifically target the Native American Church.
Wallace v Jaffree
NJ v TLO
Good News Club v. Milford Central School
Smith v. Oregon
44. Due process in suspension or expulsion
McCarthy Hearings - 1950s
Gitlow v. New York
Muller v. Oregon
Goss v Lopez
45. Follow-up to Brown v. Board of Education - this case laid out the process for school desegregation and established the concept of dismantling systems 'with all deliberate speed.'
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Smith v. Oregon
Wolf v Colorado
Brown v. Board of Education II
46. The Court held that in order to be obscene - material must be 'utterly without redeeming social value.'
DeJonge v. Oregon
Hazelwood ISD v Kuhlmeir
Roe v. Wade
Roth v. US
47. The Court fashioned the direct incitement test for deciding whether certain kinds of speech could be regulated by the government. This test holds that advocacy of illegal action is protected by the First Amendment unless imminent action is intended a
Schenck v. US
Miranda v. Arizona
Griswold v Connecticut - 1965
Brandenburg v. Ohio
48. The Court determined that direct government assistance to religious schools is unconstitutional In the majority opinion - the Court created what has become known as the 'Lemon Test' for deciding if a law is in violation of the establishment clause.
FCC v Pacifica - 1978
Minersville ISD v Gobitis
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg School District
Lemon v. Kurtzman
49. You may believe whatever you wish - but you may not be able to exercise that belief.
Free Exercise Act
LULAC v. Perry
DeJonge v. Oregon
Tinker v Des Moines ISD - 1969
50. On this appeal of the 1987 McCleskey case - the Court produced new standards designed to make it much more difficult for death-row inmates to file repeated appeals.
Griswold v Connecticut - 1965
McCleskey v. Zant
Hernandez v. Texas
Reno v ACLU - 1997