SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Civil Rights And Civil Liberties Court Cases
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Supreme Court decision holding that a state university could not admit less qualified individuals solely because of their race.
US v. Williams
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Tinker v Des Moines ISD - 1969
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
2. In this case - the Court ruled that the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was not unconstitutional.
DC v. Heller
Sedition Act - 1918
Korematsu v. US
Engel v. Vitale
3. Supreme court decision holding that school segregation is inherently unconstitutional because it violates the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection; marked the end of legal segregation in the US.
Brown v. Board of Education
Goss v Lopez
Tinker v. Des Moines
Near v. Minnesota
4. Case wherein the Supreme Court began to formulate rules designed to make it easier for states to regulate obscene materials and to return to communities a greater role in determining What is obscene.
Wisconsin v Yoder
Miller v. California
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
Roe v. Wade
5. Identified an implied right to privacy in the U.S. Constitution using the 1st - 3rd - 4th - 5th - and 9th amendment. Hint: This case involved birth control and married couples... relate this somehow to the Griswold family vacation movies?
Weeks v. US
Griswold v Connecticut - 1965
Tinker v Des Moines ISD - 1969
Reynolds v US
6. Extended 1981 ruling to high schools for use of facilities by religious groups after hours [est. clause and schools]
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Equal Access Act
US v O'Brien - 1969
LULAC v. Perry
7. States may provide school vouchers to parents that may use the money to attend religious school. [exception to lemon v. kurtzman]
Brown v. Board of Education
National Socialist Party of America v Skokie - 1977
Lawrence v. Texas
Mueller v Allen - 1983
8. Law must be clearly secular - not prohibiting or inhibiting religion - and there should be no excessive entanglement
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Hoyt v. Florida
Mapp v Ohio
Goss v Lopez
9. Names attached to five cases brought under the Civil Rights Act of 1857. In 1883 - the Supreme Court decided that discrimination in a variety of public accommodations could not be prohibited by the act because such discrimination was private discrimi
Wallace v Jaffree
Civil Rights Cases
Equal Access Act
Miranda v Arizona - 1966
10. The Supreme Court used this case to end capital punishment - at least in the short run.
Hernandez v. Texas
Oregon v Smith
Palko v. Connecticut
Furman v. Georgia
11. You can burn the flag [symbolic speech]
Texas v Johnson - 1989
Sherbert v Verner
Wallace v Jaffree
Welsh v US
12. Moments of silent prayer at school are unconstitutional---moments of silence are not. [est. clause and schools]
Wallace v Jaffree
Goss v Lopez
Lawrence v. Texas
Lee v Weisman
13. Unsuccessful attempt to challenge Georgia's sodomy law. The case was overturned by Lawrence v. Texas.
McCleskey v. Zant
Bowers v. Hardwick
Wallace v Jaffree
Mueller v Allen - 1983
14. Evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights is sometimes inadmissible for a criminal prosecution in a court of law.
NJ v TLO
exclusionary rule
Stenberg v. Carhart
Symbolic Speech
15. 'Bad Tendency Doctrine -' speech restricted if it has tendency to lead to illegal actions; selectively incorporated freedom of speech to states
Gitlow v NY - 1925
FCC v Pacifica - 1978
Hernandez v. Texas
Symbolic Speech
16. Ll nine Justices of the Court voted to strike down anti-indecency provisions of the Communications Decency Act (the CDA) - finding they violated the freedom of speech provisions of the First Amendment [obscenity]
Reed v. Reed
Reno v ACLU - 1997
Griswold v Connecticut - 1965
Brown v. Board of Education
17. Established exclusionary rule [4th amendment]; Fremont Weeks was suspected of using the mail system to distribute chances in a lottery - which was considered gambling and was illegal in Missouri. State agents entered his home - searched his room - an
Weeks v US - 1914
Bethel ISD v Fraser
Korematsu v. US
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
18. Incorporation (free exercise)
Heller vs. DC - 2008
Near v Minnesota - 1931
Lukumi Babalu Aye v City of Hialeah
Cantwell v Connecticut
19. The Fifth Amendment requires that individuals arrested for a crime must be advised of their right to remain silent and to have counsel present.
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
Miranda v. Arizona
Texas v Johnson - 1989
Lawrence v. Texas
20. The Court found that a San Francisco law banning cleaners from operating in wooden buildings violated the Fourteenth Amendment in its application
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg School District
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
Smith Act 1940
Gonzales v. Oregon
21. If a defendant cannot afford an attorney the state must provide one. Incorporated the 6th amendment.
National Socialist Party of America v Skokie - 1977
Cooper v. Aaron
Gideon v Wainwright - 1963
Yates v US - 1957
22. Ruled that the First Amendment protected radical and revolutionary speech - unless it posed a 'clear and present danger'. (overt action required) [Free Speech]
Gregg v. Georgia
Yates v US - 1957
Texas v Johnson - 1989
Abington SD v Schempp
23. Declared that a work is obscene and may be regulated by the gov if work taken as a whole appeals to prurient interests - work portrays sexual conduct in a patently offensive way and work taken as a whole lacks literary - artistic - political or scien
Texas v Johnson - 1989
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Miller v. California
24. Supreme Court ruling that simply publishing a defamatory falsehood is not enough to justify a libel judgment. 'Actual malice' must be proved to support a finding of libel against a public figure.
Hernandez v. Texas
Mapp v Ohio
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
Tinker v. Des Moines
25. The Court fashioned the direct incitement test for deciding whether certain kinds of speech could be regulated by the government. This test holds that advocacy of illegal action is protected by the First Amendment unless imminent action is intended a
Free Exercise Act
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Dennis v US - 1951
Good News Club v. Milford Central School
26. The Court concluded that St. Paul - Minnesota's Bias-Motivated Crime Ordinance violated the First Amendment because it regulated speech based on the content of the speech.
are.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
Mueller v Allen - 1983
Cooper v. Aaron
US v. Williams
27. (no burning draft card) [symbolic speech]
28. Due process in suspension or expulsion
Reno v ACLU - 1997
Goss v Lopez
Cantwell v Connecticut
Gonzales v. Oregon
29. Case wherein the Court broke with tradition and issued a unanimous decision against the Little Rock School Board - ruling that the district's evasive schemes to avoid the Brown II decision were illegal.
Tinker v Des Moines ISD - 1969
Cooper v. Aaron
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Lee v Weisman
30. Mandatory prayer in schools is a violation of the establishment clause
Bowers v. Hardwick
Reno v ACLU - 1997
Engle v Vitale
Sedition Act - 1918
31. Religious organization can obtain federal grants to help solve societal problems [exception to lemon v. kurtzman]
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Bowen v. Kendrick
Tinker v Des Moines ISD - 1969
Miller v. California
32. Congressional measure banning saying 'unloyal -' things during wartime; violated 1st amendment rights & convicted many [free speech]
Vernonia ISD v Acton
Near v Minnesota - 1931
Sedition Act - 1918
Gideon v Wainwright - 1963
33. The Court voted to uphold the constitutionality of the university of Michigan law school's affirmative action policy - which gave preference of minority students.
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
Grutter v. Bollinger
New York Times v Sullivan - 1964
McCarthy Hearings - 1950s
34. Incorporated the First Amendment's right to freedom of assembly.
Bethel ISD v Fraser
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
DeJonge v. Oregon
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg School District
35. The Fourteenth Amendment did not impose specific limitations on criminal justice in the states - and that illegally obtained evidence did not necessarily have to be excluded from trials in all cases.
Wolf v Colorado
Goldman v Weinberger
Good News Club v. Milford Central School
Gitlow v. New York
36. Free exercise of religion not violation of compulsory attendance laws; Amish children do not have to go to school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade
McCarthy Hearings - 1950s
Wolf v Colorado
Wisconsin v Yoder
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
37. On this appeal of the 1987 McCleskey case - the Court produced new standards designed to make it much more difficult for death-row inmates to file repeated appeals.
Texas v Johnson - 1989
Religious Freedom Restoration Act - 1993
McCleskey v. Zant
Schenck v. US
38. Halt to all death penalty punishments in nation until a less arbitrary method of sentencing was found [8th]
Gideon v Wainwright - 1963
Goss v Lopez
Furman v Georgia - 1972
Minersville ISD v Gobitis
39. States not allowed to prevent or punish inflammatory speech unless it will lead to imminent lawless action [free speech]
LULAC v. Perry
Goss v Lopez
Brandenburg v Ohio - 1969
Plessy v. Ferguson
40. Concluded that the U.S. Congress lacked the constitutional authority to bar slavery in the territories; this decision narrowed the scope of national power while it enhanced that of the states. Also declared that slaves couldn't sue since they weren't
Gitlow v. New York
Lukumi Babalu Aye v City of Hialeah
Bowen v. Kendrick
Dred Scott v. Sandford
41. A case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment required that government demonstrate a compelling government interest before denying unemployment compensation to someone Who was fired b
Grutter v. Bollinger
WVA Board of Ed. v Barnette
Sherbert v Verner
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
42. Court made it illegal to send or receive images online that are indistinguishable from that of a minor in a sexual act.
McCleskey v. Zant
Mapp v. Ohio
US v. Williams
Hazelwood ISD v Kuhlmeir
43. Established the Supreme Court's rationale for distinguishing between protected and unprotected speech. Fighting words
Welsh v US
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
Tinker v Des Moines ISD - 1969
44. Prior restraint case; the Court ruled that a trial judge could not prohibit the publication or broadcast of information about a murder trial.
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart
Civil Rights Cases
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
Equal Access Act
45. Students may be searched by school administrators if they have reasonable belief---this is a lower standard than probable cause.
LULAC v. Perry
DeJonge v. Oregon
WVA Board of Ed. v Barnette
NJ v TLO
46. The arm band in schools case; First Amendment applied to public schools - and that administrators would have to demonstrate constitutionally valid reasons for any specific regulation of speech in the classroom. [symbolic speech]
Tinker v Des Moines ISD - 1969
Griswold v Connecticut - 1965
Goldman v Weinberger
Abrams v US - 1919
47. The Court ruled that an all-male jury did not violate a woman's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Hoyt v. Florida
New York Times v US - 1971
Symbolic Speech
Gregg v Georgia - 1976
48. The confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment does not guarantee defendants an absolute right to come face to face with their accusers.
New York Times v Sullivan - 1964
Minersville ISD v Gobitis
Gitlow v NY - 1925
Maryland v. Craig
49. Public schools may not have clergy lead prayers at graduation ceremonies [est. clause and schools]
Miranda v Arizona - 1966
Lee v Weisman
Oregon v Smith
Miranda v. Arizona
50. This case was an unsuccessful attempt to challenge Pennsylvania's restrictive abortion regulations.
Wolf v Colorado
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Stenberg v. Carhart
Griswold v. Connecticut