SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
CSET Spanish Subtest
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
cset
,
languages
,
spanish
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Decline in speaker's first language proficiency while a second language is being learned
Basic Interpersonal communicative skills
Educate America Act of 1994
Language loss
Biliteracy
2. Foreign words that have become permanent part of recipient language. part of continuum of codeswitching
Basic Interpersonal communicative skills
Language borrowing
Language Acquisition Device
Metalinguistic awareness
3. Goal: assimilation. contain bilingual kids but are barely bilingual in nature
lexical gaps
Mendez v Westminster 1947
Weak Models of Bilingual Education
Language interference
4. Most supported by VII funds. students are temporarily allowed to use native tongue until they are competent enough to move into mainstream education
Sheltered English instruction
Transitional Bilingual Education
Developmental Maintenance and Heritage Language
Dual Language education
5. Minority language speakers are denied access to programs/schools
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965
social competence
Segregationalist
Critical Literacy Approach
6. Skills in literacy of primary language can be transferred to second language
Connectionism
Semilingual
Transitional Bilingual Education
Biliteracy
7. Two years maximum in mother tongue
Early exit bilingual education
Literacy
Immersion v Submersion
Immersion
8. Acquires both languages at the same time and prior to the age of 3
Meaningful input
Simultaneous language acquisition
Audiolingualism
Information processing approach
9. Brain is a complex network of links between information - links are strengthened when repetitively activated
Holistic view of bilingualism
Transitional Bilingual Education
Connectionism
Language achievement
10. A language minority separates from the language majority in order to protect their language
Circumstantial bilingualism
Connectionism
Separatist Education
Diglossia
11. The ability to interact with text in reading or writing in order to produce meaning
Critical Literacy Approach
Literacy
Oracy
Mainstream Education (with foreign language teaching)
12. The ability to think about the nature and functions of language
Meyer v Nebraska 1923
Bilingual Dual Coding Model
Metalinguistic awareness
Williams v State of California 2000
13. Language learner is adapting to new culture - degree to which new language is gained depends on degree to which person integrates self into new culture
Acculturation
Common underlying proficiency
Mendez v Westminster 1947
Connectionism
14. Idea that readers bring their own meaning to text
Biliteracy
Language loss
Oracy
Construction of Meaning Approach
15. Can be measured in six different ways. need to measure in ways beyond linguistic competence
strategic competence
Language Competence
National Defense and Education Act of 1958
Personal factors in language acquisition
16. Plaintiffs sued the state to complain about appalling conditions of public schools. included specific provisions state better bilingual education instruction was needed. State settled and is making changed throughout the state
Communicative sensitivity
Separate underlying proficiency
Williams v State of California 2000
Segregationalist
17. Supreme Court declared a state law prohibiting the teaching of a foreign language unconstitutional under 14th Amendment. Found that proficiency in other language was not 'injurious to health or morals of child
Language interference
lexical gaps
Sheltered English instruction
Meyer v Nebraska 1923
18. Outward evidence of language competence
Language performance
Late exit bilingual education
Submersion with pull - out classes
Lau v Nichols 1970
19. Language learning is made possible by acquiring distinct set of speech habits. Lessons should move from simple to complex linguistics
Educate America Act of 1994
Late exit bilingual education
Audiolingualism
Language borrowing
20. Major education reform. set high standards for immigrant communities and continued federal support for bilingual programs. acknowledged benefits of bilingual education
Literacy
Educate America Act of 1994
Biliteracy
Diglossia
21. Individual characteristics affect language input: ability - aptitude - attitude - motivation
Personal factors in language acquisition
Oracy
Meyer v Nebraska 1923
Accommodation
22. Language teaching is about conveying meaning - focus on socially appropriate forms of communication; suggests learners need to identify some of their own errors. Implicit rule formation rather than explicit habit
Diglossia
Developmental Maintenance and Heritage Language
Personal factors in language acquisition
Meaningful input
23. Ability to use appropriate strategies in constructing texts and spoken discourse
Language interference
Codemixing
discourse competence
Language competence
24. Happens when learner has weak identification with own ethnic group - does not regard their ethnic group as inferior to dominant group - finds their position mobile and wishes to move into 'out - group'
Castaneda v Pickard 1978
Codeswitching
Accommodation
Meyer v Nebraska 1923
25. Allows around 40% of classroom teaching in the mother tongue until the 6th grade
Late exit bilingual education
Language borrowing
Personal factors in language acquisition
Proposition 227 of 1998
26. Starts with 100% immersion in second language - reducing after 2-3 yrs to 80% for next 3-4 yrs - then ending junior schooling with apx. 50% immersion
Bilingual Dual Coding Model
Simultaneous language acquisition
Total immersion
sociolinguistic competence
27. Type of second language information received when learning language
Language Competence
Language interference
Divergent thinking
Language inputs
28. Receptive skill: listening - Productive skill: speaking
Codeswitching
Oracy
Immersion
Language competence
29. Idea that languages constitute two 'balloons' in the brain and there's only so much room for both of them. Incorrect - languages share
Separate underlying proficiency
Intake
Construction of Meaning Approach
Diglossia
30. Someone who does not have total competency in either language
Transitional Bilingual Education
Critical Literacy Approach
Immersion
Semilingual
31. Literacy: learning to read/write naturally for a purpose - for meaningful communication and for inherent pleasure. Reading and writing seen as connected - demands process of learning is interesting and relevant to student
Whole Language Approach
Elective bilingualism
Acculturation
Language skills
32. Authorized by Congress in 1978 - allowing native language to be used only as much as necessary to develop English skills
Critical Literacy Approach
Transitional bilingual education
Holistic view of bilingualism
Submersion
33. Inner - mental representation of language
Proposition 227 of 1998
Language competence
Cognitive/academic language proficiency
Metalinguistic awareness
34. Idea that the further the child moves to balanced bilingualism - the more likely cognitive advantages exist. 1st threshold: enough proficiency to avoid negative effects. 2nd threshold: enough for advantages to exist
Segregationalist
Threshold theory
Literacy
Critical Literacy Approach
35. Immersion: optional - thrives on conviction - students generally start with same lack of experience in second language - additive bilingualism.
Immersion v Submersion
Construction of Meaning Approach
Literacy
Cognitive/academic language proficiency
36. Effect on self - esteem and ego - new cultural reference
non - linguistic outcomes
Williams v State of California 2000
Cognitive/academic language proficiency
Literacy
37. Refers to those people whose experiences are not well represented by their language and therefore have difficulties expressing their thoughts and feelings verbally
Common underlying proficiency
Language inputs
lexical gaps
Nationality Act of 1906
38. What is actually assimilated. more important than input
Biliteracy
social competence
Intake
Holistic view of bilingualism
39. Context reduced situations: pronunciation - grammar - vocab
Meaningful output
Cognitive/academic language proficiency
Separate underlying proficiency
Transitional Bilingual Education
40. Need to emphasize speaking and writing (ability to communicate with others) in addition to input (listening and reading) in the classroom
Meaningful output
Total immersion
Meaningful input
Lau v Nichols 1970
41. Ability to use verbal and non - verbal communication strategies to compensate for gaps in language user's knowledge
Segregationalist
Language Acquisition Device
strategic competence
Language Competence
42. Literacy can be used to maintain hegemony/control masses and it can also be a liberator
Critical Literacy Approach
Construction of Meaning Approach
Basic Interpersonal communicative skills
Williams v State of California 2000
43. Learning language to survive
Subtractive language acquisition
Circumstantial bilingualism
Intake
Semilingual
44. Minority students in submersion programs but are pulled out to have ESL lessons. Students fall behind on classroom content and seen as remedial
Literacy
Functional Literacy Approach
Codemixing
Submersion with pull - out classes
45. When equal numbers of minority and majority language students are in the same classroom. aim is to produce balanced bilinguals. language compartmentalization
Whole Language Approach
Interdependence
Dual Language education
Meaningful output
46. Ability to develop appropriate cultural meaning from texts
Meaningful input
Structured input
Sociocultural Literacy Approach
lexical gaps
47. People who translate and sometimes transform ideas into socially acceptable terms
Late exit bilingual education
language brokers
Williams v State of California 2000
Intake
48. Observable - clearly defined components of language
Castaneda v Pickard 1978
Weak Models of Bilingual Education
Language skills
Information processing approach
49. Learn second language with little pressure to replace/remove first
Translanguaging
Accommodation
Additive bilingualism
Mendez v Westminster 1947
50. Majority language students learn minority language. works better if there is high incentive (economic - social) for students to learn language
Mainstream Education (with foreign language teaching)
non - linguistic outcomes
Proposition 227 of 1998
Whole Language Approach