SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
DSST Criminal Justice And Law Enforcement
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
dsst
,
law-enforcement
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 4th amendment - search and seizure - S&S not violated if officer has suspicion of suspect being armed - May search outer person and clothing for weapons - Called a (Terry stop) = stop and frisk - Extended to temporary detention of people in vehicles
Juveniles
Benefits
Terry v. Ohio
English Law
2. Remain silent - Anything said can be used in court - Right to counsel - Right to attorney during questioning - If indigent (poor) right to have attorney provided
equation to figure crime rate
Miranda rights
appellate court
BURGLARY
3. 1769 - England - No coerced self incriminating evidence. 1789 US - Bill of Rights - 4th and 5th amendments - No search and seizure without probable cause. 1960's US - No involuntary confessions. 1961 US - Mapp vs. Ohio gives exclusionary rights to st
exclusionary rule versions
Kent vs. US
Amendment 5
Before interrogation
4. 4th amendment - search and seizure - Ruled that evidence violating search and seizure protections may not be used is STATE and FEDERAL court - Mapp applies the 4th amendment to state courts
US v Leon
Prisons growing
Mapp vs. Ohio
National Crime Information Center (NCIC)
5. Wrong only because it is prohibited - unlawful act by virtue of statute
US v Leon
Before interrogation
mala prohibita
equation to figure crime rate
6. What would make an Officer want to stay in the police force longer?
UCR Participation
Benefits
Gideon vs. Wainwright
List Index crimes
7. Where did common law come ?
Crime Index total
11th century England
UCR Participation
UCR limitations
8. The sum of selected offenses used to measure crime rates and their fluctuations reported to law enforcement. The offenses included in the Crime Index total are the violent crimes of Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter - Forcible Rape - Robbery - and
Hudson vs. Palmer
Crime Index total
actus reu
Parens patriae
9. Willful homicide - forcible rape - robbery - burglary - aggravated assault - larceny over $50 - motor vehicle theft - arson
Shock probation
List Index crimes
UCR limitations
Amendment 5
10. Berkley California police chief - Developed the office of police chief - Integrated records system - 'Father of Modern Law Enforcement' - Taught O.W. Wilson at Berkley - Wanted policemen to have degrees - Removed politics from policing - First to use
Vollmer (1876 to 1955)
English Law
New York
loco parentis
11. Due process (4th and 5th) - in a capital trial - the defendant must be given access to counsel upon his or her own request as part of due process
Amendment 4
Hudson vs. Palmer
Powell vs. Alabama
English Law
12. State Prison - 1819 NY - 1st electric chair execution (1890) - Schedule of hard work in day - then prayer and contemplation - Segregated by type of crime - Originated the black stripe uniform - Also called the congregate system - inmates congregate d
Mapp vs. Ohio
English Law
status offenses
Auburn Prison system design
13. UCR = police report - NCVS = survey of households - comparisons of the UCR and NCVS data sets show there to be a high degree of correspondence between the two systems.
Miranda vs. Arizona
Juveniles
mala in se
UCR vs. NCVS
14. 4th and 5th amendment - Interrogation responses allowed only when attorney rights have been understood and waived
UCR limitations
Parens patriae
Miranda vs. Arizona
Drug use
15. Guilty mind - act does not make guilty without the mind - add actus rea to mens rea = crime
mens rea
Amendment 8
LEAA
BURGLARY
16. Miranda vs. Arizona
Right to remain silent case
status offenses
UCR limitations
ROBBERY
17. Divide the amount a particular crime is committed by the total population for the city. So if the crime of assault was committed 4 -000 times in a city of 120 -000 - you divide 4 -000 by 120 -000. The answer comes up to be about .03 (or 3%). This mea
equation to figure crime rate
Where was the concept/right of due process first written down
11th century England
First Juvenile Court in the United States
18. Boston (1838)
Vollmer (1876 to 1955)
% minorities in law enforcement
Robert Peel (1788 to 1850)
First US Police dept
19. Person receives money through coercion - Demanding money for not writing ticket
police extortion
Payton vs. New York
ROBBERY
status offenses
20. 16%
Powell vs. Alabama
Crime Index total
writ of habeas corpus
% of women in law enforcement
21. In the place (instead) of the parent - allows The state or institutions to act on behalf of their students and non biological parents to act as biological parents on behalf of the child
Gideon vs. Wainwright
Auburn Prison system design
loco parentis
Benefits
22. 'State as parent' - state serves as parent of juvenile (father)
Hudson vs. Palmer
mala prohibita
Parens patriae
Tennessee vs. Garner
23. Probation is front end - sentence in leu of incarceration - a sentence option for misdemeanors and some felonies - a decision by the JUDGE - parole is back end - supervised release of a prisoner before completion of prison sentence - a decision by th
Right to remain silent case
Kent vs. US
O.W. Wilson (1900 to 1972)
Difference between Parole and Probation
24. 8th amendment - no cruel and unusual punishment - Ruled that the death penalty was NOT cruel and unusual punishment
Crime Index total
UCR
Gregg vs. Georgia
O.W. Wilson (1900 to 1972)
25. 6th amendment counsel must be provided for indigent (poor) defendants
writ of habeas corpus
Mapp vs. Ohio
Tennessee vs. Garner
Gideon vs. Wainwright
26. Voluntary - 95% participate - only the highest scoring offense is scored and the rest are ignored
Juveniles
UCR Participation
exclusionary rule versions
US v Leon
27. Sheriff
What office would Americans - during the 17th and 18th century rely for protection
LARCENY
Parens patriae
Crime Index total
28. First Juvenile hall
appellate court
Amendment 14
New York
Part II offenses
29. Civil service reform - 1883 - gov jobs on basis of merit - exams - not politics
equation to figure crime rate
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. U.S
Pendleton Act
Kent vs. US
30. Not accutate - relies on local law enforcement agency - can only measure crime known to police - cannot provide an accurate representation of actual crime rates. Misrepresentation: focused upon street crime -does not record information on many other
US v Leon
Gregg vs. Georgia
UCR limitations
loco parentis
31. Taking or attempting to take something of value from another person by use of force - threats or intimidation. It is committed in the presence of the victim - divided into different 'degrees'. The degrees vary by state and can also depend on whether
Pendleton Act
Mapp vs. Ohio
ROBBERY
Adkins vs. Virginia
32. 4th amendment - no warrant w/o probable cause - When officer is in pursuit he may use deadly force if suspect is escaping and the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a significant threat to officers and others
appellate court
Benefits
Tennessee vs. Garner
Shock probation
33. Illinois - 1899
Amendment 6
UCR vs. NCVS
First Juvenile Court in the United States
English Law
34. Guilty act - external or objective of the crime
LARCENY
First Juvenile Court in the United States
actus reu
Prisons growing
35. 8th amendment - no cruel and unusual punishment - Death penalty not allowed for mentally retarded persons
Tennessee vs. Garner
loco parentis
O.W. Wilson (1900 to 1972)
Adkins vs. Virginia
36. Fastest growing group of criminals in the United States
actus reu
First US Police dept
Juveniles
writ of habeas corpus
37. The Metropolitan Police Department of London
Which cases granted protection under the 4th amendment
Part II offenses
First Police Dept
Difference between Parole and Probation
38. Does not include homicides - survey of households - expensive to conduct - covers the frequency of crime victimization
mala prohibita
UCR
NCVS
Miranda rights
39. Trial by jury - rights of the accused - Confrontation of witnesses - Speedy trial - Public trial - Right to counsel
Amendment 6
Gregg vs. Georgia
LARCENY
Knapp Commission investigated police corruption in which US city
40. Judge ordered incarceration for a short time (30-120 days) - the release to probation (aka reconsider then recall)
Parens patriae
Shock probation
BURGLARY
Amendment 14
41. Payton - Terry - Leon - Mapp - Tenn - Hudson
loco parentis
Which cases granted protection under the 4th amendment
Amendment 5
National Crime Information Center (NCIC)
42. New York
mens rea
Knapp Commission investigated police corruption in which US city
Miranda vs. Arizona
exclusionary rule versions
43. 4th amendment - search and seizure - Ruled that prison cells could be searched - that prisoners have no right against search and seizure - Decision: Fourth Amendment does not apply to prison inmates - Significance: After Hudson - prisoners who are tr
Amendment 4
% of women in law enforcement
NCVS
Hudson vs. Palmer
44. Formed the Met police of London at Scotland Yard - London system was national - origin of the term 'bobbies' - 'The Father of Modern Policing' - 'Police are public - public are police.'
Juvenile Status offenses
English Law
Robert Peel (1788 to 1850)
ROBBERY
45. Wrong or evil - conduct wrong by nature - used as the basis for common law
Kent vs. US
Drug use
police extortion
mala in se
46. 1215 - Magna Carta
UCR limitations
Where was the concept/right of due process first written down
11th century England
Vollmer (1876 to 1955)
47. Speaking out - defendant speaking out on their own behalf prior sentencing
Miranda rights
exclusionary rule versions
allocution
English Law
48. Similar to burglary. The major difference between the two is that the perpetrator did not illegally enter a structure by using forcible - non forcible or attempted forcible entry (with the exception of a motor vehicle.) All thefts of motor vehicles o
Terry v. Ohio
Miranda vs. Arizona
Payton vs. New York
LARCENY
49. Unlawful entry of a 'structure' to commit a felony or a theft. Burglary is commonly known as a 'break in -' or - 'breaking and entering.' A 'structure' is usually in reference to physical buildings but not cars. Car breakins or thefts are considered
ROBBERY
BURGLARY
status offenses
List Part 1 crimes
50. 20%
% minorities in law enforcement
Amendment 6
Juveniles
allocution