SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
GMAT Critical Reasoning
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
gmat
,
logic-and-reasoning
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A category of assumption - cause and effect conclusions; correlation is not causation. - look for an assumption that eliminates an alternate model of causation - you must rule out the causality in the other direction
Identifying the Question Type
Can eliminate alternate causes for a given conclusion
Identify all claims from facts (which can be proven) - Alternate Way to Find the Conclusion
Fill in a logic gap
2. Identify the conclusion and choose the best AC that restates or paraphrases it
Weaken the Conclusion
Restate the Conclusion A Minor Question Type (MQT)
S-W-Slash Chart
Weaken: Wrong Answer Choice Type - Wrong direction
3. A category of assumption - 'how do we logically get from Point A to Point B?' - key words: therefore - because - for this reason - etc. - fact-based or background information; occasionally reflects an opinion or claim
Wrong Answer Choice Types: Draw a Conclusion - Switching Terms
Extreme Words
Fill in a logic gap
MQT: Analyze Argument Structure
4. Provides a conclusion that is opposite of what the argument says.
Can eliminate alternate causes for a given conclusion
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices
Wrong Answer Choice Types: Draw a Conclusion - Wrong Direction
LEN: Least Extreme Negation Technique
5. Poses two seemingly contradictory premises and find the AC that best reconciles them - Question will indicate the discrepancy or provide a keyword pointing to it in the argument: yet - however - nonetheless - paradoxically - surprising because...Argu
LEN Examples
LEN: Least Extreme Negation Technique
Identifying the Parts of an Argument
Minor Question Type: Explain an Event or Discrepancy
6. A category of assumption - uses some type of superlative qualifier like only/best/worst way - there shouldn't be another way or better/worse way.
Assumption
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Addresses the premise only
Eliminate alternate paths to reach a given conclusion
S-W-Slash Chart
7. Provide unnecessary information about a premise - make sure answer choices are not simply related to the conclusion but also weaken it - an answer choice can seem realistic - but only need to determine whether it weakens the argument
Major Question Types
Assumption: Ties to the Conclusion
Minor Question Type: Explain an Event or Discrepancy
Weaken: Wrong Answer Choice Type - No tie to the conclusion
8. 1. Look for the conclusion - often the last sentence of an argument - but sometimes the first. 2. Find the premises that lead to the conclusion - provide ALL the pieces of information written in the argument. - provide evidence that supports or leads
Major Question Types
Weaken the Conclusion: Argument/Counterargument
Finding the Conclusion
Identifying the Parts of an Argument
9. Identify information that would help evaluate the validity of a given conclusion - the correct AC will provide a way to TEST the conclusion
'Except' and 'Fill in the Blank' Questions
Evaluate the Conclusion A Minor Question Type (MQT)
The AC that gives a new - fact-based premise
Mimic the Argument A Minor Question Type (MQT)
10. To strengthen an argument - look for an answer choice that fixes a weakness of the conclusion - validates an assumption - or introduces new supporting evidence. A premise can strengthen or support a conclusion without being necessary for that conclus
Strengthen the Conclusion
The 'Therefore' test
Weaken the Conclusion
Answer Choices: Process of Elimination
11. Arguments contain 2 opposing points of view. Assess answer choices by holding them in opposition to the conclusion or one of its assumptions. 1. Identify the conclusion from the point of view of the author. 2. Note the counter-claim and it's proponen
Draw a Conclusion
Weaken the Conclusion: Argument/Counterargument
Strengthen the Conclusion: Wrong Answer Choice Type - No Tie to the Conclusion
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Wrong direction
12. Is a disguised version of a known question type. Once you recognize what type it is - use the standard strategies for that type.
13. They limit the scope of an argument and can be useful in identifying incorrect answer choices. They provide nuances to the argument - which can help you make some answer choices correct or incorrect. When diagramming - be sure to include boundary wor
Boundary Words
Assumption: Ties to the Conclusion
Strengthen the Conclusion: Wrong Answer Choice Type - Wrong Direction
Establish the feasibility of the premises of an argument
14. Therefore - As a result - Suggests - It follows that - Indicates - Accordingly - So - Consequently - Thus - Hence - Should
Signal Words for Conclusion
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices
Diagramming Efficiently
Can eliminate alternate causes for a given conclusion
15. Always - only - all >> insert not necessarily or sometimes... Not - Never - none - not one - not once >> at least one - at least once - Some - a few - several >> no - none - Sometimes - on occasion - often >> never - At least - at most - more than -
LEN Examples
Weaken 'EXCEPT' Questions
Draw a Conclusion
Restate the Conclusion A Minor Question Type (MQT)
16. In order to clarify a question stem with EXCEPT - rephrase the EXCEPT statement into a question - inserting the word NOT and eliminating the word EXCEPT. Ex: 'Each of the following helps to explain event X except...' turns into 'Which one does NOT ex
17. To help the process of elimination: 1. Write down letters A-E. 2. Evaluate each answer choice and note whether a. It strengthens the conclusion with an S b. it weakens the conclusion with a W c. Is irrelevant to the conclusion with a slash through it
Strengthen the Conclusion: Wrong Answer Choice Type - No Tie to the Conclusion
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Follow on
S-W-Slash Chart
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Switching terms
18. Select a situation that best exemplifies the conclusion
Provide an Example A Minor Question Type (MQT)
'Except' and 'Fill in the Blank' Questions
Resolve a Problem A Minor Question Type (MQT)
Finding the Conclusion
19. Read the passage and label each boldface as Fact - Opinion - or Conclusion. Skim each answer choice - only looking for terminology matching F - O - C. Eliminate AC that don't match F - O - C classification.
Strengthen the Conclusion
The AC that gives a new - fact-based premise
Weaken 'EXCEPT' Questions
MQT: Analyze Argument Structure - faster approach
20. Provides an assumption that is not actually necessary for the conclusion to be logically valid. - breaks up a category subtype
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Addresses the premise only
Argument Structure
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - No ties to the conclusion
Finding the Conclusion
21. When reading any question stem - try to classify the problem. Then - as you diagram - proactively find answers for the question type. Read the question stem first. If it is not immediately helpful - do not dwell. The process of diagramming will gener
'Fill in the Blank'
Identifying the Question Type
Strengthen the Conclusion: Wrong Answer Choice Type - No Tie to the Conclusion
LEN: Least Extreme Negation Technique
22. In 'Explain an Event or Discrepancy' - Look for __________ that shows why the discrepancy is not one - after you add it to existing premises - it shoul make sense all together - correct AC fills a logical hole in the argument - allowing all premises
LEN: Least Extreme Negation Technique
The AC that gives a new - fact-based premise
Provide an Example A Minor Question Type (MQT)
Identifying the Question Type
23. Extreme words make the answer choices incorrect - unless the argument explicitly justifies/states extreme words. A correct answer choice must be 100% true. When you see boundary or extreme words in an answer - ask 'what is the most extreme example I
Fill in a logic gap
Weaken the Conclusion
Diagramming Efficiently
Boundary & Extreme Words in Answer Choices
24. Only use this method when the primary patterns do not apply. A) predict the future - will - should - can be expected to - could result in - are likely to B) subjective opinion - anything that cannot be proven C) cause & effect - if...then - as a resu
Identify all claims from facts (which can be proven) - Alternate Way to Find the Conclusion
MQT: Analyze Argument Structure
Resolve a Problem A Minor Question Type (MQT)
LEN Examples
25. If an argument involves percentages - use real - concrete numbers. The words inference - assertion - prediction and claim are all synonyms for conclusion.
Signal Words for Conclusion
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - No ties to the conclusion
Identifying the Parts of an Argument
Use Real Numbers - Make an Inference
26. Commonly uses words 'assumption - assume - flaw or questionable'. Assumptions serve as a necessary bridge between the premises and the conclusion. The correct answer choice of an assumption question must be necessary to the conclusion of the argument
Weaken the Conclusion
Assumption: Ties to the Conclusion
Evaluate the Conclusion A Minor Question Type (MQT)
Find the Assumption Questions
27. Analyze the logical flow of a argument and choose the AC that most closely mimics the argument flow or structure - be sure to not spend too much time
Strengthen the Conclusion: Wrong Answer Choice Type - No Tie to the Conclusion
Mimic the Argument A Minor Question Type (MQT)
The T Diagram
Weaken the Conclusion
28. A category of assumption - Reflects opinions or claims and that these are true or that a sequence of events will occur in a way the argument assumes.
Establish the feasibility of the premises of an argument
Signal Words for Premises
Signal Words for Conclusion
The T Diagram
29. Describe the role of a part or parts of an argument - often use argument/counterargument structure (use modified T-diagram) Don't spend too much time - eliminate a few choices and move on. Two boldfaced statements - determine the role each one plays
Weaken: Wrong Answer Choice Type - Wrong direction
Fill in a logic gap
MQT: Analyze Argument Structure
Strengthen the Conclusion: Wrong Answer Choice Type - No Tie to the Conclusion
30. Premise + (assumption) = Conclusion
Provide an Example A Minor Question Type (MQT)
'Except' and 'Fill in the Blank' Questions
Identifying the Parts of an Argument
Argument Structure
31. Always - never - all -none - etc. They make the argument very broad or far-reaching - making it susceptible to attack. Note any extreme language used in premises or conclusions with an (!). This strategy ONLY applies to words in the argument. _______
Strengthen the Conclusion: Wrong Answer Choice Type - No Tie to the Conclusion
Mimic the Argument A Minor Question Type (MQT)
Extreme Words
Restate the Conclusion A Minor Question Type (MQT)
32. What do you do when two or more answer choices are very tempting? Use the Least Extreme Negation (LEN) technique. - negate answer choices to see whether the argument fails - use the least extreme negation possible. If the conclusion can still follow
LEN: Least Extreme Negation Technique
S-W-Slash Chart
Identify all claims from facts (which can be proven) - Alternate Way to Find the Conclusion
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Wrong direction
33. 1. Abbreviate anything you can but don't abbreviate so much that you change or lose the argument. 2. Underline key words - details and boundary words. 3. Use arrows to indicate cause and effect relationships. 4. Identify point of view with a colon to
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Addresses the premise only
Diagramming Efficiently
Fill in a logic gap
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - No ties to the conclusion
34. Most common among critical reasoning questions.Correct answers do NOT need to make the conclusion false or invalid; just needs to make it less likely that the conclusion is valid.
Assumption
Establish the feasibility of the premises of an argument
Weaken the Conclusion
Wrong Answer Choice Types: Draw a Conclusion - Wrong Direction
35. 1. Focus on the essential meaning. 2. Use EXTREME shorthand.3. Keep terms the same - try to keep exact wording of key points. 4. Make sure you understand what you are writing.
How to Diagram an Argument: The T-Diagram
The 'Therefore' test
Weaken the Conclusion
The AC that gives a new - fact-based premise
36. 1. Expose a faulty or tenuous assumption OR 2. Negatively impacts the conclusion directly
Wrong Answer Choice Types: Draw a Conclusion - Wrong Direction
The 'Therefore' test
What Correct answers do
Boundary Words
37. The main point of the argument - logically supported by the assumptions and premises. In the form of an opinion or claim.
Identifying the Parts of an Argument
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - No ties to the conclusion
Conclusion
Wrong Answer Choice Types: Draw a Conclusion - Wrong Direction
38. A powerful technique. If an answer choice in a question is negated and the argument becomes nonsensical - then the answer choice is almost certainly correct. An argument might depend on several assumptions - any of which could be the answer. However
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - No ties to the conclusion
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Follow on
Negating an assumption
The AC that gives a new - fact-based premise
39. Unstated parts of an argument that are necessary to reach the given conclusion. NEVER stated in the written argument.
Extreme Words
The 'Therefore' test
Assumption
'Fill in the Blank'
40. 1. Draw a large T - leaving more room on the left 'pro' side than the right 'con' side. 2. Look for the conclusion and write it on the top of the T. 3. Read the argument sentence by sentence. Write any pro premises on the left and cons on the right.
Provide an Example A Minor Question Type (MQT)
LEN: Least Extreme Negation Technique
Signal Words for Premises
The T Diagram
41. Make sure to note if a question is strengthen or weaken the conclusion so as to not mistakenly choose the wrong answer - use an S-W-slash chart
MQT: Analyze Argument Structure
Establish the feasibility of the premises of an argument
Weaken: Wrong Answer Choice Type - Wrong direction
Minor Question Type: Explain an Event or Discrepancy
42. Conclude something from a given set of premises - the conclusion you draw must be true as a result of only the given premises; it should not require any additional assumptions. Sample question stems: 'If the statements above are true - which of the f
Draw a Conclusion
Identifying the Parts of an Argument
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Follow on
LEN: Least Extreme Negation Technique
43. The conclusion you select should be supported by at least some of the premises. The conclusion does NOT need to address all of the premises. A correct answer may be a mathematical or logical deduction. In this type of question - the entire body of th
Minor Question Type: Explain an Event or Discrepancy
Draw a Conclusion: Stay Close to the Premises
Wrong Answer Choice Types: Draw a Conclusion - Wrong Direction
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Addresses the premise only
44. Presented in 3 common ways - so read the question first! 1. Question contains the conclusion. 2. Question hints at the conclusion in the argument. 3. Argument contains an obvious conclusion - indicated by a clear signal word. Some GMAT questions ask
Finding the Conclusion
'Fill in the Blank'
Provide an Example A Minor Question Type (MQT)
The AC that gives a new - fact-based premise
45. Tied to a premise and provides unnecessary information about a premise - if the premise is already a stated fact - it doesn't need support - make sure the answer choice is not simply related to the conclusion but supports it
MQT: Analyze Argument Structure
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - No ties to the conclusion
Strengthen the Conclusion: Wrong Answer Choice Type - No Tie to the Conclusion
S-W-Slash Chart
46. Explains or leads to a premise instead of the conclusion
LEN: Least Extreme Negation Technique
Major Question Types
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Addresses the premise only
Minor Question Type: Explain an Event or Discrepancy
47. Follows on from the conclusion instead of identifying an assumption that underlies the conclusion
Finding the Conclusion
Weaken 'EXCEPT' Questions
Wrong Answer Choice Types: Draw a Conclusion - Wrong Direction
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Follow on
48. If you have two claims X & Y - ask yourself which leads to the other. A) 'X - therefore Y'. If this works - Y is the conclusion. B) 'Y - therefore X'. If this works - X is the conclusion. The deduction that takes place last logically in the sequence
49. Solve a problem posed by the premises - correct AC should directly counteract or fix a given problem. Tend to appear as a new premise - wrong AC will address some piece of the argument but not counteract or fix the problem. Some wrong AC will reinfor
Wrong Answer Choice Types: Draw a Conclusion - Out of Scope
Resolve a Problem A Minor Question Type (MQT)
Assumptions: Wrong Answer Choices - Wrong direction
Answer Choices: Process of Elimination
50. Proposes faulty mathematical or logical reasoning - make sure that any substituted expressions are truly synonyms
Negating an assumption
Diagramming Efficiently
Wrong Answer Choice Types: Draw a Conclusion - Switching Terms
Find the Assumption Questions