SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A reporter has a qualified privilege to report on controversial matters of public interest using reputable sources.
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Herbert v. Lando
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
2. A person vs. a person (corporation can be a person too
Any civil matter
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Intrusion on physical solitude
3. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
Libel Per Se
Sixth amendmen
5 Elements of libel
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
4. Enforced freelancer/copyright actions - and publishers who were doing more than compile the stories had to pay the reporters. Electronic publications (putting it online) makes it a new publication.
Tasini v. NYT
U.S. v. Dickinson
Intrusion on physical solitude
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
5. What is shot in public place is fine - but if there is intrusion on physical solitude it is not protected.
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
False light
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
6. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Kincaid v. Gibson
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
7. Have to have an open meeting when interviewing candidates for a public position.
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
False light
8. Only in Massachusetts - you can close a preliminary hearing if the case is a sexual assault case.
District Court
Branzburg v. Hayes
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Pearson v. Dodd
9. A court order preventing a person or group from doing or continuing to do a specific act.
Injunction
Rouch 2
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Wilson v. Layne
10. Set the standard in MI that negligence is needed to prove libel - as the legislature had not acted.
Rouch 1
First amendment
Gertz v. Welch
False light
11. Broadcasters are immune from liability if political candidates defame someone while under section 315
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
New York Times v. United States
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
12. The speech and debate clause only covers members of congress within the halls of congress - not outside of it. I.E. press releases - speeches - etc.
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Tasini v. NYT
Shepherd v. Maxwell
MCLA 750.520k
13. A published article must be so inaccurate that it will have more of an effect on the reader than the literal truth would.
Public figure
Pretiral hearing
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Actual malice
14. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Dendrite v. John Does
Intrusion on physical solitude
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Private figure
15. 3rd party has no obligation to notify media when there's been a government subpoena of phone records. Also includes any form of electronic communication.
Pretiral hearing
Actual malice
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
16. Failure to obey an order made by the court
Civil contempt
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Jurisdiction
17. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
New York Times v. Sullivan
Branzburg v. Hayes
Intrusion on physical solitude
Actual malice
18. No absolute right of access to members of the media. Can be restricted within reason.
Herbert v. Lando
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Galella v. Onassis
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
19. The media must make sure that permission is acquired in commercial situations.
Galella v. Onassis
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
20. Anything punishable by more than a year in jail
Libel Perquod
Defamation
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Felonies
21. Compensatory damages are a proper remedy to avoid the injustice under a promissory estoppel claim.
Rouch 2
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
22. Money damages awarded to the injured party as compensation for a specific loss
Time Inc. v. Pape
Snepp v. United States
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Actual Damages
23. Innocent and negligent misstatement in a newspaper are protected under constitutional freedoms of speech and press.
False light
Time Inc. v. Hill
Time Inc. v. Pape
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
24. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
Irreparable harm
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Libel Per Se
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
25. School officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.
Certiorari
Defamation
Summary judgment
Morse v. Frederick
26. The OMA does not allow public bodies to bypass the law by closing meetings or doing round robin phone calls. universities are not exempt from FOIA in cases of public records.
In re Times Publishing Co.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Public figure
Right to publicity
27. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Sixth amendmen
Tickets
Felonies
Irreparable harm
28. Words that may be innocent on face - but facts make story damaging
Freedom of information act
Herbert v. Lando
Irreparable harm
Libel Perquod
29. NYT actual malice rule is extended form just public officials to include public figures
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
District Court
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
30. Judge has an absolute duty to ensure fair trial rights. Judge must be able to control what's going on in the courtroom.
Shepherd v. Maxwell
District Court
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
31. For presidential searches - MI supreme court ruled universities are 4th arm of government - and must conduct search in public.
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Fourteenth amendment
Defamation
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
32. Incidental use of someone's image cold be an invasion of privacy or defamation.
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Clark v. ABC
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
33. Requires certain information held by various federal and state agencies to be made available to the public unless the information falls under one of the exemptions.
Freedom of information act
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
District Court
34. Guarantees freedoms of speech - religion - press and assembly.
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Amicus curiae
First amendment
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
35. Even though university foundations are privately incorporated - they might be subject to comply with FOIA and OMA if the majority of funding comes from the university.
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
WXYZ v. Hand
Precedent
36. Newspaper must have known material falsity - material falsity became standard of proof in Michigan.
In re Times Publishing Co.
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Rouch 2
Freedom of Information Act
37. If a statement 'results in a material change in the meaning conveyed by the statement -' the person who says it can be sued for libel.
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Morse v. Frederick
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
38. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Herbert v. Lando
Libel Per Se
39. Recognized first amendment right of privacy for private figures against media.
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
MCLA 750.520k
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
40. Truth is only a defense in privacy cases when it's in a case of _______
Defenses of libel
5 Elements of libel
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
False light
41. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Wilson v. Layne
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
42. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Alander
Time Inc. v. Hill
Injunction
43. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Intrusion on physical solitude
Right to publicity
WXYZ v. Hand
44. There is liability even if the news organization reports both sides - if the sources are not credible.
Alander
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
45. Damages presumed - Falsely accusing someone of a crime - Statements concerning race or political belief - Damaging someone in their business - Ex. calling brain surgeon 'butterfingers'
Fair comment
Libel Per Se
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
False light
46. Lowest court handles: Tickets - civil matter - Misdemeanor - Felonies
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Adjudication
District Court
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
47. The government cannot censor. In order to exercise prior restraint - the Government must show sufficient evidence that the publication would cause a 'grave and irreparable' danger.
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Defenses of libel
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
New York Times v. United States
48. When you have a private figure plaintiff - even though state standards controls - if it's a matter of public concern - the burden of proof shifts from the defendant who no longer has to prove truth - to the plaintiff who has to prove falsity of what
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
False light
District Court
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
49. Police have to disclose incident report records. Do have to keep submitting FOIAs.
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
State News v. Michigan State University
Alander
District Court
50. First Amendment protects media to report information from official records available in open court.
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
MCLA 750.520k
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Gag order