SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Minor errors do not count as actual malice.
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Time Inc. v. Pape
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Pretiral hearing
2. When you have a private figure plaintiff - even though state standards controls - if it's a matter of public concern - the burden of proof shifts from the defendant who no longer has to prove truth - to the plaintiff who has to prove falsity of what
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
MCLA 750.520k
Tickets
Fourteenth amendment
3. No liability for publishing information that was lawfully obtained.
Intrusion on physical solitude
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Arraignment
4. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
Snepp v. United States
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Precedent
Right to publicity
5. 3rd party has no obligation to notify media when there's been a government subpoena of phone records. Also includes any form of electronic communication.
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Fair comment
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
6. If a publication accurately prints something from a false public record document - they cannot be sued for libel.
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Kincaid v. Gibson
7. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating an educational purpose.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Right to publicity
Clark v. ABC
Actual Damages
8. To claim exemption for investigative records - they must show how disclosure would interfere with proceedings. The burden of proof is on the party claiming exemption.
Evening News Association v. Troy
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Tasini v. NYT
9. The First Amendment protects college students' freedom of expression - and the Hazelwood case should not be applied to college media.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Kincaid v. Gibson
10. Words that may be innocent on face - but facts make story damaging
Qualified privilege
Libel Perquod
Alander
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
11. In Michigan - there's an absolute right of public to be present during jury selection.
Pearson v. Dodd
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Precedent
Right to publicity
12. Written defamation which causes injury to another's reputation
Libel
Tasini v. NYT
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
13. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Pearson v. Dodd
14. School officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.
Jurisdiction
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
5 Areas of privacy
Morse v. Frederick
15. Guarantees people the right to be secure in their homes and property against unreasonable searches and seizures. Also protects against the issuance of a warrant without probable cause.
Rouch 2
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Fourth amendment
Kincaid v. Gibson
16. The burden of proof imposed on public officials extends to anyone involved in a matter of public concern - regardless of whether they were famous or unknown.
Galella v. Onassis
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
17. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Branzburg v. Hayes
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Civil contempt
18. The power of authority of a particular court to hear and adjudicate matters in dispute
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
First amendment
Jurisdiction
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
19. Plaintiffs are not entitled to an order unmasking an anonymous author when the statements in question cannot support a cause of action for defamation.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
6th - cincinnati OH
In re Times Publishing Co.
20. The OMA does not allow public bodies to bypass the law by closing meetings or doing round robin phone calls. universities are not exempt from FOIA in cases of public records.
Wilson v. Layne
Defamation
Herbert v. Lando
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
21. Prevents ISPs from liability except on copyright.
Tickets
Misdemeanor
Amicus curiae
Dendrite v. John Does
22. Anything punishable by more than a year in jail
Felonies
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Florida Star v. B.J.F
False light
23. Series of pre trail hearings: court created devices to weed out inadmissible evidence prior to trial. Often determine bargaining of prosecution and defendant to come up with plea bargain. Most cases are ended with plea bargain and don't go to trial.
Preliminary hearing
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Circuit Court
Tickets
24. in an invasion of privacy tort - an action which occurs when an individual's expectation of privacy or right to be left alone is breached. EX. A reporter lies about his identity to gain access to information they couldn't under normal conditions.
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
False light
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Intrusion on physical solitude
25. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
False light
Right to publicity
26. If the information is lawfully obtained - the defendant can't be held in contempt of court.
False light
In re Times Publishing Co.
5 Elements of libel
Freedom of Information Act
27. Recognized first amendment right of privacy for private figures against media.
Pretiral hearing
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Rouch 2
28. Broadcasters are immune from liability if political candidates defame someone while under section 315
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
New York Times v. United States
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
U.S. v. Dickinson
29. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
Tasini v. NYT
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Galella v. Onassis
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
30. The Sixth Amendment rights of a defendant outweigh the First Amendment of the press in cases where the press can have prejudicial outcome of the defendant's trial.
Freedom of information act
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Gannett v. DePasquale
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
31. Money damages awarded to the injured party as compensation for a specific loss
Kincaid v. Gibson
Actual Damages
Branzburg v. Hayes
Intrusion on physical solitude
32. Friend of the court.
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Amicus curiae
Sixth amendmen
False light
33. Guarantees freedoms of speech - religion - press and assembly.
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
First amendment
McCracken v. Evening News Association
34. Any communication - true or false - which exposes a person to hatred - ridicule or contempt. the person's reputation is harmed or damaged
Fourth amendment
WXYZ v. Hand
Defamation
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
35. Failure to obey an order made by the court
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
False light
Alander
Civil contempt
36. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
Wilson v. Layne
Evening News Association v. Troy
Felonies
Freedom of Information Act
37. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
Public figure
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
In re Times Publishing Co.
38. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
New York Times v. Sullivan
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Private figure
39. An order issued by the court to prevent attorneys and witnesses from discussing the case outside the courtroom - or reporters from publishing information obtained during a court proceeding.
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Gag order
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Pretiral hearing
40. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Pretiral hearing
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Certiorari
41. A published article must be so inaccurate that it will have more of an effect on the reader than the literal truth would.
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Snepp v. United States
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
42. If a quote is altered - in order for a publication to be sued the plaintiff must prove the meaning portrayed in altered quote is dramatically different than the actual quote
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Kincaid v. Gibson
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
43. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Right to publicity
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
44. Permission given by SCOTUS to allow a case to be appealed
New York Times v. Sullivan
Certiorari
Morse v. Frederick
Precedent
45. Set the standard in MI that negligence is needed to prove libel - as the legislature had not acted.
Fourth amendment
District Court
Rouch 1
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
46. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Tickets
MCLA 750.520k
Doctrine of neutral reportage
47. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
5 Elements of libel
Doctrine of neutral reportage
48. Protects all 'persons' from deprivation of life - liberty or property without due process of law.
Clark v. ABC
Fourteenth amendment
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
49. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Alander
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
50. Federal if between two states (although try to get it back to states) - telecommunications - crossing state lines - anything violating state law
Precedent
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Gertz v. Welch
District Court