SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. There is liability even if the news organization reports both sides - if the sources are not credible.
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Galella v. Onassis
2. Journalists and citizens must first obey court orders first before seeking appeal - even if they believe the order is unconstitutional
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
U.S. v. Dickinson
State News v. Michigan State University
3. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
4. This protects the media from liability of defamatory statements made during official proceedings. The published story must be a fair and accurate account of what happened.
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
WXYZ v. Hand
Misdemeanor
Qualified privilege
5. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
Actual malice
New York Times v. Sullivan
Gannett v. DePasquale
Rouch 1
6. A reporter has a qualified privilege to report on controversial matters of public interest using reputable sources.
Dendrite v. John Does
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Clark v. ABC
Kincaid v. Gibson
7. If you knowingly run ads that advocate criminal activity - you can be held liable. Got off on the first case - but on the second case they should have known better.
Fourteenth amendment
Arraignment
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Preliminary hearing
8. Recognized first amendment right of privacy for private figures against media.
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Preliminary hearing
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
District Court
9. Published work of copyrighted material is a violation and isn't protected under Section 107 as 'fair use.'
Doctrine of neutral reportage
District Court
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Florida Star v. B.J.F
10. Have to have an open meeting when interviewing candidates for a public position.
Sixth amendmen
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
5 Areas of privacy
Amicus curiae
11. If an ongoing - criminal investigation is actively underway - discretion may be used under the exemption claim in FOIA to withhold some documents.
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Jurisdiction
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
12. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
Any civil matter
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Dendrite v. John Does
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
13. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
Time Inc. v. Pape
Public figure
Intrusion on physical solitude
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
14. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
15. To claim exemption for investigative records - they must show how disclosure would interfere with proceedings. The burden of proof is on the party claiming exemption.
Evening News Association v. Troy
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Irreparable harm
Pearson v. Dodd
16. As long as speech was about a public official (figure) could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject - it is protected by the first amendment.
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
5 Elements of libel
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Adjudication
17. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
MCLA 750.520k
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Branzburg v. Hayes
18. Enforced freelancer/copyright actions - and publishers who were doing more than compile the stories had to pay the reporters. Electronic publications (putting it online) makes it a new publication.
Tasini v. NYT
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Amicus curiae
19. (privacy) There are areas around you that are a 'zone of privacy'
Intrusion on physical solitude
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Freedom of information act
Defenses of libel
20. hearing where the judge decides whether or not there is sufficient evidence to prove a crime. In michigan - takes place in district court
Preliminary hearing
WXYZ v. Hand
Misdemeanor
Gertz v. Welch
21. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Clark v. ABC
Herbert v. Lando
Freedom of information act
22. Broadcasters are immune from liability if political candidates defame someone while under section 315
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
5 Elements of libel
Doctrine of neutral reportage
District Court
23. School officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.
WXYZ v. Hand
Morse v. Frederick
Freedom of information act
Defamation
24. The OMA does not allow public bodies to bypass the law by closing meetings or doing round robin phone calls. universities are not exempt from FOIA in cases of public records.
6th - cincinnati OH
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
25. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Precedent
Freedom of Information Act
26. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Sixth amendmen
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
False light
Qualified privilege
27. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating an educational purpose.
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
5 Areas of privacy
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
28. If a statement 'results in a material change in the meaning conveyed by the statement -' the person who says it can be sued for libel.
Sixth amendmen
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
29. The declaration of a final judgment based on the evidence presented
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Rouch 2
Adjudication
Libel
30. Friend of the court.
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Freedom of information act
Amicus curiae
31. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Freedom of information act
First amendment
Pretiral hearing
32. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
33. There is a First amendment right of access to trials
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
34. No liability for publishing information that was lawfully obtained.
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
35. Only in Massachusetts - you can close a preliminary hearing if the case is a sexual assault case.
Amicus curiae
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Preliminary hearing
36. An order issued by the court to prevent attorneys and witnesses from discussing the case outside the courtroom - or reporters from publishing information obtained during a court proceeding.
Defamation
Fourth amendment
Gag order
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
37. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Snepp v. United States
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
38. A form of qualified privilege which gives the media the right to publish articles as long as opinions are based on relevent facts. These aretiles include opinion - columns - editorials - book reviews - movie reviews - etc.
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Fair comment
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Florida Star v. B.J.F
39. Series of pre trail hearings: court created devices to weed out inadmissible evidence prior to trial. Often determine bargaining of prosecution and defendant to come up with plea bargain. Most cases are ended with plea bargain and don't go to trial.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
5 Elements of libel
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Circuit Court
40. (privacy) a. Because of who you are - you have a right to profit from your image b. Endorsements
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
6th - cincinnati OH
Right to publicity
41. Written defamation which causes injury to another's reputation
Libel
Defamation
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Dendrite v. John Does
42. Innocent and negligent misstatement in a newspaper are protected under constitutional freedoms of speech and press.
Injunction
Time Inc. v. Hill
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Public figure
43. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Fourth amendment
Evening News Association v. Troy
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
44. Incidental use of someone's image cold be an invasion of privacy or defamation.
Clark v. ABC
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Tickets
45. In Michigan - booking photos are available to the public.
Arraignment
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
46. Harm done which the law cannot remedy.
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Irreparable harm
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Felonies
47. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Private figure
Tickets
Herbert v. Lando
48. The press has no greater constitutional right to access penal facilities than any member of the general public
Time Inc. v. Pape
New York Times v. United States
Libel Per Se
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
49. A person vs. a person (corporation can be a person too
Irreparable harm
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Any civil matter
50. Guarantees freedoms of speech - religion - press and assembly.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
MCLA 750.520k
First amendment
Public figure