SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Sixth amendmen
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Kincaid v. Gibson
2. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
Preliminary hearing
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
3. In an invasion of privacy tort - the right an individual has to profit from their likeness - or to prevent others from gaining value for their own commercial benefit
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Right to publicity
5 Areas of privacy
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
4. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Alander
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
5. School officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.
Morse v. Frederick
First amendment
Intrusion on physical solitude
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
6. Series of pre trail hearings: court created devices to weed out inadmissible evidence prior to trial. Often determine bargaining of prosecution and defendant to come up with plea bargain. Most cases are ended with plea bargain and don't go to trial.
Precedent
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Circuit Court
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
7. A judgment made by the court before or during a trial. This judgment is in repsonse to a motion by the plaintiff or defendant - who claims there is not enough evidence or there is no dispute that the information given is fact.
Morse v. Frederick
Summary judgment
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
8. There is liability even if the news organization reports both sides - if the sources are not credible.
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Pretiral hearing
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
9. Set the standard in MI that negligence is needed to prove libel - as the legislature had not acted.
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
District Court
Rouch 1
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
10. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
WXYZ v. Hand
MCLA 750.520k
Pearson v. Dodd
Civil contempt
11. Opinion - privilege - fair comment - truth - constitutional defenses
Defenses of libel
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Fourteenth amendment
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
12. A proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Certiorari
Evening News Association v. Troy
13. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
Herbert v. Lando
Pearson v. Dodd
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
14. Money damages awarded to the injured party as compensation for a specific loss
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Right to publicity
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Actual Damages
15. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Irreparable harm
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Clark v. ABC
16. As long as speech was about a public official (figure) could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject - it is protected by the first amendment.
Pearson v. Dodd
Defenses of libel
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
17. Protects all 'persons' from deprivation of life - liberty or property without due process of law.
Fourteenth amendment
Arraignment
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Wilson v. Layne
18. Only in Massachusetts - you can close a preliminary hearing if the case is a sexual assault case.
Amicus curiae
Morse v. Frederick
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
19. Newspapers do not have an equal time requirement like broadcast has.
Freedom of information act
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Tickets
20. For presidential searches - MI supreme court ruled universities are 4th arm of government - and must conduct search in public.
Freedom of Information Act
U.S. v. Dickinson
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Gannett v. DePasquale
21. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Time Inc. v. Pape
Fourteenth amendment
22. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Private figure
Precedent
Sixth amendmen
Rouch 2
23. A constructive trust is a proper manner of relinquishing the profits of one who abuses a confidential position.
Snepp v. United States
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
24. What is shot in public place is fine - but if there is intrusion on physical solitude it is not protected.
False light
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Time Inc. v. Pape
Libel Perquod
25. (privacy) Ex. Beyonce has a thing of Ocean Spray orange juice. Ocean Spray uses the photo as a marketing campaign. Beyonce could go after them.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
26. The media must make sure that permission is acquired in commercial situations.
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
District Court
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
State News v. Michigan State University
27. Judge has an absolute duty to ensure fair trial rights. Judge must be able to control what's going on in the courtroom.
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Felonies
Evening News Association v. Troy
Shepherd v. Maxwell
28. Minor errors do not count as actual malice.
Time Inc. v. Pape
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Precedent
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
29. Michigan is in ____ district court in ____ -____
Fourth amendment
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
6th - cincinnati OH
30. A reporter has a qualified privilege to report on controversial matters of public interest using reputable sources.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Libel
Doctrine of neutral reportage
31. Federal if between two states (although try to get it back to states) - telecommunications - crossing state lines - anything violating state law
District Court
False light
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Libel Perquod
32. The OMA does not allow public bodies to bypass the law by closing meetings or doing round robin phone calls. universities are not exempt from FOIA in cases of public records.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Amicus curiae
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
33. If an ongoing - criminal investigation is actively underway - discretion may be used under the exemption claim in FOIA to withhold some documents.
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
34. Police have to disclose incident report records. Do have to keep submitting FOIAs.
Any civil matter
State News v. Michigan State University
Intrusion on physical solitude
Branzburg v. Hayes
35. The government cannot censor. In order to exercise prior restraint - the Government must show sufficient evidence that the publication would cause a 'grave and irreparable' danger.
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
New York Times v. United States
36. Guarantees people the right to be secure in their homes and property against unreasonable searches and seizures. Also protects against the issuance of a warrant without probable cause.
Certiorari
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
New York Times v. Sullivan
Fourth amendment
37. To claim exemption for investigative records - they must show how disclosure would interfere with proceedings. The burden of proof is on the party claiming exemption.
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Felonies
Civil contempt
Evening News Association v. Troy
38. (privacy) There are areas around you that are a 'zone of privacy'
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Defamation
Intrusion on physical solitude
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
39. A person vs. a person (corporation can be a person too
Any civil matter
Actual malice
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
40. If you get the information from outside sources - you can publish it. MCL 750.520k does not constitute an unlawful prior restraint on publication. Rather - the statute directs that the court file be withheld from the public
Libel Perquod
Actual malice
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Intrusion on physical solitude
41. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Certiorari
Actual malice
42. Compensatory damages are a proper remedy to avoid the injustice under a promissory estoppel claim.
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Fourteenth amendment
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
43. In Michigan - booking photos are available to the public.
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Preliminary hearing
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
44. Truth is only a defense in privacy cases when it's in a case of _______
Defenses of libel
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
False light
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
45. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Pearson v. Dodd
Rouch 2
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
46. Innocent and negligent misstatement in a newspaper are protected under constitutional freedoms of speech and press.
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Time Inc. v. Hill
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Gertz v. Welch
47. Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency - 2. Intrusion on physical solitude - 3. False light - 4. Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit - 5. Right to publicity
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
5 Areas of privacy
District Court
Fourth amendment
48. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Freedom of information act
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
False light
49. No absolute right of access to members of the media. Can be restricted within reason.
Galella v. Onassis
Kincaid v. Gibson
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
False light
50. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Rouch 2
Dendrite v. John Does
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge