SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Reconfirmed that you cannot censor news media and its coverage unless theirs a clear and present danger.
Kincaid v. Gibson
Right to publicity
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
2. In Michigan - booking photos are available to the public.
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Dendrite v. John Does
5 Elements of libel
3. Failure to obey an order made by the court
Civil contempt
Rouch 1
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Shepherd v. Maxwell
4. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Tickets
Actual malice
Gag order
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
5. This protects the media from liability of defamatory statements made during official proceedings. The published story must be a fair and accurate account of what happened.
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
False light
Qualified privilege
6. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
Jurisdiction
State News v. Michigan State University
WXYZ v. Hand
Fourth amendment
7. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
Public figure
Adjudication
Intrusion on physical solitude
Sixth amendmen
8. Upon the request of the counsel or the victim - you can order that the names of the victim and actor and details of the alleged offense be suppressed until such time as the actor is arraigned - the charge is dismissed - or the case is otherwise concl
Actual malice
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Rouch 2
MCLA 750.520k
9. In an invasion of privacy tort - the right an individual has to profit from their likeness - or to prevent others from gaining value for their own commercial benefit
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Tickets
Right to publicity
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
10. The press has no greater constitutional right to access penal facilities than any member of the general public
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Public figure
11. An order issued by the court to prevent attorneys and witnesses from discussing the case outside the courtroom - or reporters from publishing information obtained during a court proceeding.
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Gag order
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
12. The Sixth Amendment rights of a defendant outweigh the First Amendment of the press in cases where the press can have prejudicial outcome of the defendant's trial.
Circuit Court
Gannett v. DePasquale
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Felonies
13. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
Freedom of Information Act
Public figure
New York Times v. Sullivan
Precedent
14. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating it is lewd - indecent or offensive - or have legitimate pedagogical concerns.
Libel Per Se
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
15. When you have a private figure plaintiff - even though state standards controls - if it's a matter of public concern - the burden of proof shifts from the defendant who no longer has to prove truth - to the plaintiff who has to prove falsity of what
State News v. Michigan State University
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
16. School officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.
Morse v. Frederick
In re Times Publishing Co.
Preliminary hearing
Jurisdiction
17. If a quote is altered - in order for a publication to be sued the plaintiff must prove the meaning portrayed in altered quote is dramatically different than the actual quote
Wilson v. Layne
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
18. If an ongoing - criminal investigation is actively underway - discretion may be used under the exemption claim in FOIA to withhold some documents.
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Doctrine of neutral reportage
19. If a publication accurately prints something from a false public record document - they cannot be sued for libel.
Defenses of libel
Actual Damages
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Time Inc. v. Firestone
20. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Precedent
21. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
Amicus curiae
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
22. Prevents ISPs from liability except on copyright.
Certiorari
Dendrite v. John Does
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Fourteenth amendment
23. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Time Inc. v. Firestone
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Wilson v. Layne
24. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Qualified privilege
Snepp v. United States
Sixth amendmen
Time Inc. v. Firestone
25. A proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
Amicus curiae
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Circuit Court
26. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Libel
Pretiral hearing
WXYZ v. Hand
False light
27. If you knowingly run ads that advocate criminal activity - you can be held liable. Got off on the first case - but on the second case they should have known better.
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Any civil matter
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
28. A person vs. a person (corporation can be a person too
Any civil matter
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
29. Michigan is in ____ district court in ____ -____
6th - cincinnati OH
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Gag order
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
30. Motions for summary judgment is applicable if the publication is not private facts and is newsworthy.
Fourth amendment
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Circuit Court
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
31. In an invasion of privacy tort - an action that characterizes a person falsely. Often the person is misrepresented by quoting out of context - the careless use of photos or cutlines - or by using a picture from one story as a picture for another.
Gag order
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Clark v. ABC
False light
32. Newspapers do not have an equal time requirement like broadcast has.
Libel Perquod
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
33. The burden of proof imposed on public officials extends to anyone involved in a matter of public concern - regardless of whether they were famous or unknown.
5 Elements of libel
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
34. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating an educational purpose.
WXYZ v. Hand
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Circuit Court
Injunction
35. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
In re Times Publishing Co.
36. Set the standard in MI that negligence is needed to prove libel - as the legislature had not acted.
Public figure
Rouch 1
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
37. Plaintiffs are not entitled to an order unmasking an anonymous author when the statements in question cannot support a cause of action for defamation.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
38. If you get the information from outside sources - you can publish it. MCL 750.520k does not constitute an unlawful prior restraint on publication. Rather - the statute directs that the court file be withheld from the public
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
5 Elements of libel
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
39. The power of authority of a particular court to hear and adjudicate matters in dispute
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Jurisdiction
40. As long as speech was about a public official (figure) could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject - it is protected by the first amendment.
Gannett v. DePasquale
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Libel
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
41. In Michigan - there's an absolute right of public to be present during jury selection.
Defenses of libel
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Gag order
42. The media must make sure that permission is acquired in commercial situations.
Jurisdiction
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
43. There is a first amendment right of access to the public to cover and attend trials.
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Wilson v. Layne
Defamation
44. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Freedom of Information Act
Rouch 2
45. The First Amendment protects college students' freedom of expression - and the Hazelwood case should not be applied to college media.
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Kincaid v. Gibson
Fair comment
46. (privacy) There are areas around you that are a 'zone of privacy'
Pretiral hearing
Amicus curiae
False light
Intrusion on physical solitude
47. Innocent and negligent misstatement in a newspaper are protected under constitutional freedoms of speech and press.
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Time Inc. v. Hill
Gannett v. DePasquale
Summary judgment
48. Compensatory damages are a proper remedy to avoid the injustice under a promissory estoppel claim.
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
49. A court order preventing a person or group from doing or continuing to do a specific act.
Injunction
Fourth amendment
U.S. v. Dickinson
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
50. There is liability even if the news organization reports both sides - if the sources are not credible.
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
In re Times Publishing Co.
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court