SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Pearson v. Dodd
Precedent
Galella v. Onassis
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
2. Failure to obey an order made by the court
Clark v. ABC
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Civil contempt
3. Police have to disclose incident report records. Do have to keep submitting FOIAs.
Public figure
Morse v. Frederick
Preliminary hearing
State News v. Michigan State University
4. (privacy) There are areas around you that are a 'zone of privacy'
Freedom of information act
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Intrusion on physical solitude
5. This protects the media from liability of defamatory statements made during official proceedings. The published story must be a fair and accurate account of what happened.
Qualified privilege
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Tickets
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
6. Under FOIA - personell records may be released - subject to 'appropriate redactions.'
Qualified privilege
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Libel
7. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
U.S. v. Dickinson
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
8. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Gag order
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Fourteenth amendment
Alander
9. Written defamation which causes injury to another's reputation
District Court
Libel
Evening News Association v. Troy
Libel Per Se
10. The speech and debate clause only covers members of congress within the halls of congress - not outside of it. I.E. press releases - speeches - etc.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
11. Guarantees people the right to be secure in their homes and property against unreasonable searches and seizures. Also protects against the issuance of a warrant without probable cause.
Jurisdiction
Fourth amendment
District Court
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
12. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Rouch 1
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Branzburg v. Hayes
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
13. Criminal matters anything less than a year in jail
Misdemeanor
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Intrusion on physical solitude
14. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
Pearson v. Dodd
Public figure
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
15. Anything punishable by more than a year in jail
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Pearson v. Dodd
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Felonies
16. A person vs. a person (corporation can be a person too
Summary judgment
Any civil matter
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
17. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
5 Elements of libel
Any civil matter
In re Times Publishing Co.
District Court
18. There is a First amendment right of access to trials
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
19. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
Galella v. Onassis
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Fourth amendment
Dendrite v. John Does
20. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Wilson v. Layne
Irreparable harm
Tickets
21. Upon the request of the counsel or the victim - you can order that the names of the victim and actor and details of the alleged offense be suppressed until such time as the actor is arraigned - the charge is dismissed - or the case is otherwise concl
Galella v. Onassis
Intrusion on physical solitude
State News v. Michigan State University
MCLA 750.520k
22. in an invasion of privacy tort - an action which occurs when an individual's expectation of privacy or right to be left alone is breached. EX. A reporter lies about his identity to gain access to information they couldn't under normal conditions.
Intrusion on physical solitude
Rouch 2
Fair comment
Time Inc. v. Hill
23. The First Amendment protects college students' freedom of expression - and the Hazelwood case should not be applied to college media.
Kincaid v. Gibson
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Shepherd v. Maxwell
24. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Rouch 2
New York Times v. United States
Amicus curiae
Private figure
25. The government cannot censor. In order to exercise prior restraint - the Government must show sufficient evidence that the publication would cause a 'grave and irreparable' danger.
False light
New York Times v. United States
Galella v. Onassis
Misdemeanor
26. Newspaper must have known material falsity - material falsity became standard of proof in Michigan.
Public figure
Rouch 2
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Intrusion on physical solitude
27. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Gag order
Pearson v. Dodd
28. Reading of the charges against a person
Arraignment
False light
District Court
Libel Per Se
29. NYT actual malice rule is extended form just public officials to include public figures
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Pearson v. Dodd
Right to publicity
30. A proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Right to publicity
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Kincaid v. Gibson
31. The power of authority of a particular court to hear and adjudicate matters in dispute
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Preliminary hearing
Jurisdiction
State News v. Michigan State University
32. NYT actual malice standard does not extend to private figures. However - it's up to the states to determine what a private figure is - and there's a new standard that says you have to prove harm and damages.
Gertz v. Welch
Actual Damages
Felonies
Amicus curiae
33. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating an educational purpose.
Actual malice
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Intrusion on physical solitude
Libel Perquod
34. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
New York Times v. Sullivan
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
35. As long as speech was about a public official (figure) could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject - it is protected by the first amendment.
Clark v. ABC
Defamation
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
36. Opinion - privilege - fair comment - truth - constitutional defenses
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Defenses of libel
Kincaid v. Gibson
37. Reconfirmed that you cannot censor news media and its coverage unless theirs a clear and present danger.
Preliminary hearing
5 Elements of libel
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Freedom of Information Act
38. Broadcasters are immune from liability if political candidates defame someone while under section 315
Intrusion on physical solitude
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Dendrite v. John Does
39. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Any civil matter
Actual Damages
Pretiral hearing
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
40. In Michigan - booking photos are available to the public.
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
District Court
41. If you get the information from outside sources - you can publish it. MCL 750.520k does not constitute an unlawful prior restraint on publication. Rather - the statute directs that the court file be withheld from the public
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
42. For presidential searches - MI supreme court ruled universities are 4th arm of government - and must conduct search in public.
WXYZ v. Hand
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
5 Elements of libel
Qualified privilege
43. Incidental use of someone's image cold be an invasion of privacy or defamation.
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Clark v. ABC
Morse v. Frederick
Circuit Court
44. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Rouch 2
Shepherd v. Maxwell
45. No liability for publishing information that was lawfully obtained.
U.S. v. Dickinson
Actual malice
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Gertz v. Welch
46. Series of pre trail hearings: court created devices to weed out inadmissible evidence prior to trial. Often determine bargaining of prosecution and defendant to come up with plea bargain. Most cases are ended with plea bargain and don't go to trial.
Precedent
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Circuit Court
47. Harm done which the law cannot remedy.
District Court
In re Times Publishing Co.
Evening News Association v. Troy
Irreparable harm
48. Federal if between two states (although try to get it back to states) - telecommunications - crossing state lines - anything violating state law
District Court
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Jurisdiction
Civil contempt
49. To claim exemption for investigative records - they must show how disclosure would interfere with proceedings. The burden of proof is on the party claiming exemption.
Actual Damages
Defamation
Time Inc. v. Pape
Evening News Association v. Troy
50. The press has no greater constitutional right to access penal facilities than any member of the general public
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Injunction
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Houchins v. KQED Inc.