SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Private members of society are not required by the First Amendment to meet the 'actual malice' standard in order to recover damage.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
2. Reading of the charges against a person
Tickets
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Arraignment
Defamation
3. Reckless disregard for the truth; knowing falsity
Freedom of Information Act
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Actual malice
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
4. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Libel
Pretiral hearing
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Rouch 2
5. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
In re Times Publishing Co.
Private figure
Fourteenth amendment
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
6. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Fair comment
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Pearson v. Dodd
7. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Doctrine of neutral reportage
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
8. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Time Inc. v. Hill
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Gannett v. DePasquale
9. Friend of the court.
Felonies
Injunction
Amicus curiae
Libel
10. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Public figure
Wilson v. Layne
11. For purposes of divorce - there may be some elements of a public person's private life that make them a private figure.
Right to publicity
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Libel Per Se
Time Inc. v. Firestone
12. When you have a private figure plaintiff - even though state standards controls - if it's a matter of public concern - the burden of proof shifts from the defendant who no longer has to prove truth - to the plaintiff who has to prove falsity of what
Freedom of Information Act
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
13. Enforced freelancer/copyright actions - and publishers who were doing more than compile the stories had to pay the reporters. Electronic publications (putting it online) makes it a new publication.
Circuit Court
Fourth amendment
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Tasini v. NYT
14. In Michigan - booking photos are available to the public.
Actual Damages
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Irreparable harm
Jurisdiction
15. For presidential searches - MI supreme court ruled universities are 4th arm of government - and must conduct search in public.
Amicus curiae
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Adjudication
16. Journalists and citizens must first obey court orders first before seeking appeal - even if they believe the order is unconstitutional
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
U.S. v. Dickinson
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
17. Reconfirmed that you cannot censor news media and its coverage unless theirs a clear and present danger.
In re Times Publishing Co.
5 Areas of privacy
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Shepherd v. Maxwell
18. If you knowingly run ads that advocate criminal activity - you can be held liable. Got off on the first case - but on the second case they should have known better.
Morse v. Frederick
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
19. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Tickets
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
20. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Gertz v. Welch
New York Times v. Sullivan
Arraignment
21. 3rd party has no obligation to notify media when there's been a government subpoena of phone records. Also includes any form of electronic communication.
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Freedom of information act
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
22. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Wilson v. Layne
Time Inc. v. Hill
WXYZ v. Hand
23. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Alander
Clark v. ABC
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
24. The burden of proof imposed on public officials extends to anyone involved in a matter of public concern - regardless of whether they were famous or unknown.
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Sixth amendmen
Defamation
Summary judgment
25. The press has no greater constitutional right to access penal facilities than any member of the general public
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Galella v. Onassis
Libel Perquod
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
26. This protects the media from liability of defamatory statements made during official proceedings. The published story must be a fair and accurate account of what happened.
Certiorari
Intrusion on physical solitude
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Qualified privilege
27. Published work of copyrighted material is a violation and isn't protected under Section 107 as 'fair use.'
Gannett v. DePasquale
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Pearson v. Dodd
28. Police have to disclose incident report records. Do have to keep submitting FOIAs.
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Irreparable harm
Private figure
State News v. Michigan State University
29. Plaintiffs are not entitled to an order unmasking an anonymous author when the statements in question cannot support a cause of action for defamation.
Time Inc. v. Hill
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Libel
30. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Herbert v. Lando
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
31. Words that may be innocent on face - but facts make story damaging
Libel Perquod
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Tickets
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
32. First Amendment protects media to report information from official records available in open court.
Branzburg v. Hayes
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
District Court
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
33. Institutes procedures to ensure every citizen has the right to access government documents - as well as the right to inspect and receive copies of records from state and local government bodies.
Libel
Freedom of Information Act
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Libel Perquod
34. If the information is lawfully obtained - the defendant can't be held in contempt of court.
In re Times Publishing Co.
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
35. The government cannot censor. In order to exercise prior restraint - the Government must show sufficient evidence that the publication would cause a 'grave and irreparable' danger.
New York Times v. United States
Precedent
Actual malice
Time Inc. v. Hill
36. NYT actual malice rule is extended form just public officials to include public figures
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
6th - cincinnati OH
Snepp v. United States
37. Upon the request of the counsel or the victim - you can order that the names of the victim and actor and details of the alleged offense be suppressed until such time as the actor is arraigned - the charge is dismissed - or the case is otherwise concl
Pearson v. Dodd
MCLA 750.520k
5 Elements of libel
Clark v. ABC
38. If an ongoing - criminal investigation is actively underway - discretion may be used under the exemption claim in FOIA to withhold some documents.
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Fair comment
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
39. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Pretiral hearing
40. Any communication - true or false - which exposes a person to hatred - ridicule or contempt. the person's reputation is harmed or damaged
Defamation
Summary judgment
Herbert v. Lando
Public figure
41. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
False light
Wilson v. Layne
Snepp v. United States
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
42. The First Amendment protects college students' freedom of expression - and the Hazelwood case should not be applied to college media.
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Kincaid v. Gibson
43. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
6th - cincinnati OH
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Wilson v. Layne
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
44. Failure to obey an order made by the court
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Right to publicity
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Civil contempt
45. Series of pre trail hearings: court created devices to weed out inadmissible evidence prior to trial. Often determine bargaining of prosecution and defendant to come up with plea bargain. Most cases are ended with plea bargain and don't go to trial.
Libel Perquod
Morse v. Frederick
Circuit Court
Amicus curiae
46. Minor errors do not count as actual malice.
Snepp v. United States
Time Inc. v. Pape
Rouch 1
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
47. The declaration of a final judgment based on the evidence presented
Adjudication
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Time Inc. v. Pape
Galella v. Onassis
48. Protects all 'persons' from deprivation of life - liberty or property without due process of law.
Right to publicity
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Fourteenth amendment
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
49. Incidental use of someone's image cold be an invasion of privacy or defamation.
In re Times Publishing Co.
U.S. v. Dickinson
Sixth amendmen
Clark v. ABC
50. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
Injunction
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Preliminary hearing
Libel Per Se