SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Summary judgment
Sixth amendmen
Arraignment
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
2. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
Wilson v. Layne
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Freedom of Information Act
False light
3. A proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Libel
First amendment
4. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Pearson v. Dodd
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Certiorari
Fourth amendment
5. Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency - 2. Intrusion on physical solitude - 3. False light - 4. Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit - 5. Right to publicity
Freedom of Information Act
Branzburg v. Hayes
Sixth amendmen
5 Areas of privacy
6. Words that may be innocent on face - but facts make story damaging
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Libel Perquod
7. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
Circuit Court
Actual malice
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
False light
8. The OMA does not allow public bodies to bypass the law by closing meetings or doing round robin phone calls. universities are not exempt from FOIA in cases of public records.
Precedent
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Injunction
9. Any communication - true or false - which exposes a person to hatred - ridicule or contempt. the person's reputation is harmed or damaged
Defamation
Alander
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Certiorari
10. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
11. Requires certain information held by various federal and state agencies to be made available to the public unless the information falls under one of the exemptions.
Public figure
WXYZ v. Hand
Actual malice
Freedom of information act
12. Only in Massachusetts - you can close a preliminary hearing if the case is a sexual assault case.
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Intrusion on physical solitude
6th - cincinnati OH
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
13. A person vs. a person (corporation can be a person too
Any civil matter
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
New York Times v. United States
New York Times v. Sullivan
14. The First Amendment protects college students' freedom of expression - and the Hazelwood case should not be applied to college media.
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Kincaid v. Gibson
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
15. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Galella v. Onassis
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Branzburg v. Hayes
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
16. The declaration of a final judgment based on the evidence presented
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Adjudication
Certiorari
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
17. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
Misdemeanor
Wilson v. Layne
Time Inc. v. Firestone
5 Elements of libel
18. If a statement 'results in a material change in the meaning conveyed by the statement -' the person who says it can be sued for libel.
Time Inc. v. Pape
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
In re Times Publishing Co.
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
19. School officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.
Rouch 1
Morse v. Frederick
Public figure
Wilson v. Layne
20. In the case where a party challenges the underlying facts that support a trial court's decision - the appellate court must defer to the trial court's view of the facts.
Amicus curiae
Private figure
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
21. 3rd party has no obligation to notify media when there's been a government subpoena of phone records. Also includes any form of electronic communication.
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Felonies
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Doctrine of neutral reportage
22. A constructive trust is a proper manner of relinquishing the profits of one who abuses a confidential position.
Felonies
Snepp v. United States
Right to publicity
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
23. (privacy) a. Because of who you are - you have a right to profit from your image b. Endorsements
Right to publicity
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Intrusion on physical solitude
Evening News Association v. Troy
24. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Tickets
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
25. Failure to obey an order made by the court
Libel Per Se
Alander
Civil contempt
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
26. If you get the information from outside sources - you can publish it. MCL 750.520k does not constitute an unlawful prior restraint on publication. Rather - the statute directs that the court file be withheld from the public
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Precedent
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
27. For purposes of divorce - there may be some elements of a public person's private life that make them a private figure.
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Time Inc. v. Firestone
MCLA 750.520k
28. Incidental use of someone's image cold be an invasion of privacy or defamation.
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Right to publicity
Clark v. ABC
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
29. What is shot in public place is fine - but if there is intrusion on physical solitude it is not protected.
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
In re Times Publishing Co.
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Gag order
30. Friend of the court.
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Amicus curiae
Fourteenth amendment
31. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Pretiral hearing
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
32. The Sixth Amendment rights of a defendant outweigh the First Amendment of the press in cases where the press can have prejudicial outcome of the defendant's trial.
Preliminary hearing
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Gannett v. DePasquale
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
33. No liability for publishing information that was lawfully obtained.
6th - cincinnati OH
Pretiral hearing
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Florida Star v. B.J.F
34. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating an educational purpose.
Amicus curiae
Actual Damages
Gannett v. DePasquale
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
35. Broadcasters are immune from liability if political candidates defame someone while under section 315
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Irreparable harm
36. (privacy) There are areas around you that are a 'zone of privacy'
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Intrusion on physical solitude
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Shepherd v. Maxwell
37. Enforced freelancer/copyright actions - and publishers who were doing more than compile the stories had to pay the reporters. Electronic publications (putting it online) makes it a new publication.
Gannett v. DePasquale
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Wilson v. Layne
Tasini v. NYT
38. In Michigan - booking photos are available to the public.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Fourth amendment
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
39. The media must make sure that permission is acquired in commercial situations.
Actual Damages
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Right to publicity
5 Elements of libel
40. Permission given by SCOTUS to allow a case to be appealed
U.S. v. Dickinson
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Certiorari
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
41. Set the standard in MI that negligence is needed to prove libel - as the legislature had not acted.
Evening News Association v. Troy
Actual Damages
Rouch 1
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
42. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
Qualified privilege
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Felonies
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
43. There is a First amendment right of access to trials
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
44. NYT actual malice rule is extended form just public officials to include public figures
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
District Court
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
45. Damages presumed - Falsely accusing someone of a crime - Statements concerning race or political belief - Damaging someone in their business - Ex. calling brain surgeon 'butterfingers'
District Court
Civil contempt
Libel Per Se
Branzburg v. Hayes
46. If the information is lawfully obtained - the defendant can't be held in contempt of court.
Libel Per Se
In re Times Publishing Co.
Summary judgment
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
47. Newspapers do not have an equal time requirement like broadcast has.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Time Inc. v. Hill
In re Times Publishing Co.
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
48. Judge has an absolute duty to ensure fair trial rights. Judge must be able to control what's going on in the courtroom.
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Shepherd v. Maxwell
False light
Time Inc. v. Firestone
49. Even though university foundations are privately incorporated - they might be subject to comply with FOIA and OMA if the majority of funding comes from the university.
District Court
U.S. v. Dickinson
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
50. The government cannot censor. In order to exercise prior restraint - the Government must show sufficient evidence that the publication would cause a 'grave and irreparable' danger.
New York Times v. United States
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Dendrite v. John Does
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises