SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The government cannot censor. In order to exercise prior restraint - the Government must show sufficient evidence that the publication would cause a 'grave and irreparable' danger.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
New York Times v. United States
Tickets
Morse v. Frederick
2. First Amendment protects media to report information from official records available in open court.
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Tickets
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
3. Under FOIA - personell records may be released - subject to 'appropriate redactions.'
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Right to publicity
WXYZ v. Hand
Libel
4. Published work of copyrighted material is a violation and isn't protected under Section 107 as 'fair use.'
Gertz v. Welch
Freedom of Information Act
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
5. Guarantees people the right to be secure in their homes and property against unreasonable searches and seizures. Also protects against the issuance of a warrant without probable cause.
Defenses of libel
Fourth amendment
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
6. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Injunction
Tasini v. NYT
Morse v. Frederick
7. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating an educational purpose.
WXYZ v. Hand
Intrusion on physical solitude
State News v. Michigan State University
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
8. For presidential searches - MI supreme court ruled universities are 4th arm of government - and must conduct search in public.
Tickets
Preliminary hearing
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Rouch 2
9. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Pretiral hearing
Fourth amendment
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
10. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
Herbert v. Lando
New York Times v. United States
Rouch 1
Galella v. Onassis
11. Recognized first amendment right of privacy for private figures against media.
Jurisdiction
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
12. Permission given by SCOTUS to allow a case to be appealed
Certiorari
Morse v. Frederick
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
WXYZ v. Hand
13. A person vs. a person (corporation can be a person too
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
First amendment
Any civil matter
Injunction
14. Reading of the charges against a person
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Actual Damages
Arraignment
15. If a statement 'results in a material change in the meaning conveyed by the statement -' the person who says it can be sued for libel.
Libel Perquod
Freedom of Information Act
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
16. Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency - 2. Intrusion on physical solitude - 3. False light - 4. Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit - 5. Right to publicity
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
U.S. v. Dickinson
5 Areas of privacy
Irreparable harm
17. Words that may be innocent on face - but facts make story damaging
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Misdemeanor
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Libel Perquod
18. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
Clark v. ABC
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
MCLA 750.520k
New York Times v. Sullivan
19. Prevents ISPs from liability except on copyright.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Dendrite v. John Does
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
20. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
Injunction
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Actual malice
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
21. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
6th - cincinnati OH
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Wilson v. Layne
22. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
Preliminary hearing
Libel
5 Elements of libel
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
23. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Intrusion on physical solitude
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Pearson v. Dodd
Shepherd v. Maxwell
24. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Defamation
Civil contempt
25. Failure to obey an order made by the court
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Precedent
Sixth amendmen
Civil contempt
26. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Sixth amendmen
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Preliminary hearing
MCLA 750.520k
27. A form of qualified privilege which gives the media the right to publish articles as long as opinions are based on relevent facts. These aretiles include opinion - columns - editorials - book reviews - movie reviews - etc.
Defenses of libel
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Fair comment
Right to publicity
28. hearing where the judge decides whether or not there is sufficient evidence to prove a crime. In michigan - takes place in district court
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Preliminary hearing
Pearson v. Dodd
McCracken v. Evening News Association
29. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Alander
Misdemeanor
Right to publicity
Dendrite v. John Does
30. Institutes procedures to ensure every citizen has the right to access government documents - as well as the right to inspect and receive copies of records from state and local government bodies.
Adjudication
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Freedom of Information Act
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
31. No absolute right of access to members of the media. Can be restricted within reason.
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Galella v. Onassis
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
32. Money damages awarded to the injured party as compensation for a specific loss
Actual Damages
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Dendrite v. John Does
Libel Per Se
33. A reporter has a qualified privilege to report on controversial matters of public interest using reputable sources.
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
5 Areas of privacy
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Summary judgment
34. For purposes of divorce - there may be some elements of a public person's private life that make them a private figure.
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Misdemeanor
Libel Perquod
Freedom of information act
35. Criminal matters anything less than a year in jail
Misdemeanor
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Pearson v. Dodd
Libel Perquod
36. In an invasion of privacy tort - an action that characterizes a person falsely. Often the person is misrepresented by quoting out of context - the careless use of photos or cutlines - or by using a picture from one story as a picture for another.
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Kincaid v. Gibson
False light
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
37. Private members of society are not required by the First Amendment to meet the 'actual malice' standard in order to recover damage.
38. Broadcasters are immune from liability if political candidates defame someone while under section 315
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Defenses of libel
Wilson v. Layne
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
39. If an ongoing - criminal investigation is actively underway - discretion may be used under the exemption claim in FOIA to withhold some documents.
Private figure
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
New York Times v. United States
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
40. NYT actual malice rule is extended form just public officials to include public figures
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
41. Compensatory damages are a proper remedy to avoid the injustice under a promissory estoppel claim.
Summary judgment
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
42. Anything punishable by more than a year in jail
Felonies
False light
District Court
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
43. Plaintiffs are not entitled to an order unmasking an anonymous author when the statements in question cannot support a cause of action for defamation.
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Intrusion on physical solitude
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
44. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Fair comment
Tickets
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Time Inc. v. Pape
45. Set the standard in MI that negligence is needed to prove libel - as the legislature had not acted.
Rouch 1
Freedom of Information Act
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
46. To claim exemption for investigative records - they must show how disclosure would interfere with proceedings. The burden of proof is on the party claiming exemption.
Evening News Association v. Troy
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Libel
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
47. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
U.S. v. Dickinson
5 Elements of libel
Branzburg v. Hayes
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
48. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating it is lewd - indecent or offensive - or have legitimate pedagogical concerns.
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Precedent
49. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
Precedent
Fourth amendment
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
50. If you get the information from outside sources - you can publish it. MCL 750.520k does not constitute an unlawful prior restraint on publication. Rather - the statute directs that the court file be withheld from the public
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
False light
Gertz v. Welch