SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Protects all 'persons' from deprivation of life - liberty or property without due process of law.
Preliminary hearing
WXYZ v. Hand
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Fourteenth amendment
2. (privacy) There are areas around you that are a 'zone of privacy'
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Time Inc. v. Pape
Intrusion on physical solitude
3. This protects the media from liability of defamatory statements made during official proceedings. The published story must be a fair and accurate account of what happened.
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Qualified privilege
Any civil matter
Fourteenth amendment
4. No liability for publishing information that was lawfully obtained.
Actual Damages
Florida Star v. B.J.F
District Court
Freedom of information act
5. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Freedom of Information Act
6. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
Tickets
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Defenses of libel
Wilson v. Layne
7. Plaintiffs are not entitled to an order unmasking an anonymous author when the statements in question cannot support a cause of action for defamation.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Rouch 2
Fourth amendment
WXYZ v. Hand
8. Published work of copyrighted material is a violation and isn't protected under Section 107 as 'fair use.'
Tasini v. NYT
False light
Kincaid v. Gibson
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
9. Federal if between two states (although try to get it back to states) - telecommunications - crossing state lines - anything violating state law
Private figure
District Court
Freedom of Information Act
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
10. Recognized first amendment right of privacy for private figures against media.
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Freedom of Information Act
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
5 Elements of libel
11. Private members of society are not required by the First Amendment to meet the 'actual malice' standard in order to recover damage.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
12. Any communication - true or false - which exposes a person to hatred - ridicule or contempt. the person's reputation is harmed or damaged
Defamation
Freedom of Information Act
Jurisdiction
U.S. v. Dickinson
13. In an invasion of privacy tort - the right an individual has to profit from their likeness - or to prevent others from gaining value for their own commercial benefit
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Right to publicity
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
14. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Pretiral hearing
First amendment
Injunction
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
15. A reporter has a qualified privilege to report on controversial matters of public interest using reputable sources.
Any civil matter
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Doctrine of neutral reportage
16. If you knowingly run ads that advocate criminal activity - you can be held liable. Got off on the first case - but on the second case they should have known better.
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
District Court
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
MCLA 750.520k
17. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating it is lewd - indecent or offensive - or have legitimate pedagogical concerns.
Tasini v. NYT
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Time Inc. v. Hill
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
18. The declaration of a final judgment based on the evidence presented
5 Elements of libel
Gag order
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Adjudication
19. Reconfirmed that you cannot censor news media and its coverage unless theirs a clear and present danger.
Tasini v. NYT
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Gag order
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
20. Upon the request of the counsel or the victim - you can order that the names of the victim and actor and details of the alleged offense be suppressed until such time as the actor is arraigned - the charge is dismissed - or the case is otherwise concl
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
New York Times v. United States
MCLA 750.520k
Fair comment
21. (privacy) Ex. Beyonce has a thing of Ocean Spray orange juice. Ocean Spray uses the photo as a marketing campaign. Beyonce could go after them.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
22. Damages presumed - Falsely accusing someone of a crime - Statements concerning race or political belief - Damaging someone in their business - Ex. calling brain surgeon 'butterfingers'
Libel Per Se
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Fair comment
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
23. The media must make sure that permission is acquired in commercial situations.
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Rouch 1
Snepp v. United States
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
24. Newspaper must have known material falsity - material falsity became standard of proof in Michigan.
Rouch 2
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Rouch 1
25. A proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Summary judgment
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
26. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
False light
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
27. Criminal matters anything less than a year in jail
District Court
Freedom of Information Act
Misdemeanor
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
28. Harm done which the law cannot remedy.
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Irreparable harm
Felonies
Actual malice
29. In an invasion of privacy tort - an action that characterizes a person falsely. Often the person is misrepresented by quoting out of context - the careless use of photos or cutlines - or by using a picture from one story as a picture for another.
State News v. Michigan State University
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Herbert v. Lando
False light
30. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
In re Times Publishing Co.
5 Areas of privacy
Precedent
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
31. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
Libel Per Se
Public figure
5 Elements of libel
False light
32. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
Gannett v. DePasquale
Herbert v. Lando
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Certiorari
33. The Sixth Amendment rights of a defendant outweigh the First Amendment of the press in cases where the press can have prejudicial outcome of the defendant's trial.
District Court
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Gannett v. DePasquale
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
34. Institutes procedures to ensure every citizen has the right to access government documents - as well as the right to inspect and receive copies of records from state and local government bodies.
Tickets
WXYZ v. Hand
Freedom of Information Act
False light
35. Series of pre trail hearings: court created devices to weed out inadmissible evidence prior to trial. Often determine bargaining of prosecution and defendant to come up with plea bargain. Most cases are ended with plea bargain and don't go to trial.
Qualified privilege
Florida Star v. B.J.F
State News v. Michigan State University
Circuit Court
36. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
District Court
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Preliminary hearing
Time Inc. v. Pape
37. 3rd party has no obligation to notify media when there's been a government subpoena of phone records. Also includes any form of electronic communication.
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
In re Times Publishing Co.
38. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Public figure
New York Times v. Sullivan
39. Even though university foundations are privately incorporated - they might be subject to comply with FOIA and OMA if the majority of funding comes from the university.
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
State News v. Michigan State University
McCracken v. Evening News Association
40. A form of qualified privilege which gives the media the right to publish articles as long as opinions are based on relevent facts. These aretiles include opinion - columns - editorials - book reviews - movie reviews - etc.
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Fair comment
Libel Per Se
WXYZ v. Hand
41. A constructive trust is a proper manner of relinquishing the profits of one who abuses a confidential position.
Snepp v. United States
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
42. There is liability even if the news organization reports both sides - if the sources are not credible.
New York Times v. Sullivan
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
43. As long as speech was about a public official (figure) could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject - it is protected by the first amendment.
Wilson v. Layne
Any civil matter
Fourth amendment
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
44. Guarantees freedoms of speech - religion - press and assembly.
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
First amendment
45. (privacy) a. Because of who you are - you have a right to profit from your image b. Endorsements
Felonies
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Right to publicity
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
46. To claim exemption for investigative records - they must show how disclosure would interfere with proceedings. The burden of proof is on the party claiming exemption.
New York Times v. Sullivan
Evening News Association v. Troy
First amendment
Rouch 2
47. If a statement 'results in a material change in the meaning conveyed by the statement -' the person who says it can be sued for libel.
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Pearson v. Dodd
Adjudication
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
48. hearing where the judge decides whether or not there is sufficient evidence to prove a crime. In michigan - takes place in district court
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Preliminary hearing
Branzburg v. Hayes
49. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Private figure
Branzburg v. Hayes
Libel Per Se
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
50. Minor errors do not count as actual malice.
Rouch 2
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Time Inc. v. Pape
Actual Damages