SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Even though university foundations are privately incorporated - they might be subject to comply with FOIA and OMA if the majority of funding comes from the university.
Branzburg v. Hayes
Irreparable harm
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
2. Judge has an absolute duty to ensure fair trial rights. Judge must be able to control what's going on in the courtroom.
Morse v. Frederick
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Time Inc. v. Hill
3. Innocent and negligent misstatement in a newspaper are protected under constitutional freedoms of speech and press.
Fair comment
Time Inc. v. Hill
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
4. In Michigan - there's an absolute right of public to be present during jury selection.
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Actual malice
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
5. A judgment made by the court before or during a trial. This judgment is in repsonse to a motion by the plaintiff or defendant - who claims there is not enough evidence or there is no dispute that the information given is fact.
Clark v. ABC
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Summary judgment
District Court
6. If you get the information from outside sources - you can publish it. MCL 750.520k does not constitute an unlawful prior restraint on publication. Rather - the statute directs that the court file be withheld from the public
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
MCLA 750.520k
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
7. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Fourteenth amendment
Pretiral hearing
Gag order
Defenses of libel
8. The speech and debate clause only covers members of congress within the halls of congress - not outside of it. I.E. press releases - speeches - etc.
Freedom of information act
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Dendrite v. John Does
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
9. Broadcasters are immune from liability if political candidates defame someone while under section 315
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Public figure
McCracken v. Evening News Association
District Court
10. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Right to publicity
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
11. Compensatory damages are a proper remedy to avoid the injustice under a promissory estoppel claim.
Any civil matter
Gannett v. DePasquale
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Summary judgment
12. A proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
False light
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
13. The media must make sure that permission is acquired in commercial situations.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Freedom of information act
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
14. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
MCLA 750.520k
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Amicus curiae
15. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
New York Times v. Sullivan
Defenses of libel
16. Failure to obey an order made by the court
Adjudication
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Herbert v. Lando
Civil contempt
17. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating it is lewd - indecent or offensive - or have legitimate pedagogical concerns.
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Adjudication
18. In Michigan - booking photos are available to the public.
Wilson v. Layne
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
First amendment
Defamation
19. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
20. Recognized first amendment right of privacy for private figures against media.
Freedom of Information Act
New York Times v. United States
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Gertz v. Welch
21. Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency - 2. Intrusion on physical solitude - 3. False light - 4. Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit - 5. Right to publicity
5 Areas of privacy
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Private figure
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
22. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
Summary judgment
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Wilson v. Layne
23. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Sixth amendmen
Misdemeanor
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
24. Money damages awarded to the injured party as compensation for a specific loss
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Actual Damages
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
25. (privacy) There are areas around you that are a 'zone of privacy'
Intrusion on physical solitude
Fourteenth amendment
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
26. Published work of copyrighted material is a violation and isn't protected under Section 107 as 'fair use.'
Time Inc. v. Pape
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Fair comment
27. (Privacy) Ex. Kim Kardashian's sex tape
Tickets
Rouch 2
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
New York Times v. United States
28. Plaintiffs are not entitled to an order unmasking an anonymous author when the statements in question cannot support a cause of action for defamation.
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
District Court
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Right to publicity
29. What is shot in public place is fine - but if there is intrusion on physical solitude it is not protected.
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Time Inc. v. Hill
30. As long as speech was about a public official (figure) could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject - it is protected by the first amendment.
District Court
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Clark v. ABC
31. Harm done which the law cannot remedy.
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Right to publicity
Galella v. Onassis
Irreparable harm
32. If the information is lawfully obtained - the defendant can't be held in contempt of court.
Certiorari
In re Times Publishing Co.
Actual Damages
Felonies
33. Guarantees freedoms of speech - religion - press and assembly.
New York Times v. Sullivan
First amendment
U.S. v. Dickinson
False light
34. The Sixth Amendment rights of a defendant outweigh the First Amendment of the press in cases where the press can have prejudicial outcome of the defendant's trial.
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Intrusion on physical solitude
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Gannett v. DePasquale
35. If a quote is altered - in order for a publication to be sued the plaintiff must prove the meaning portrayed in altered quote is dramatically different than the actual quote
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Time Inc. v. Pape
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
36. Police have to disclose incident report records. Do have to keep submitting FOIAs.
State News v. Michigan State University
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Certiorari
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
37. If a statement 'results in a material change in the meaning conveyed by the statement -' the person who says it can be sued for libel.
6th - cincinnati OH
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Intrusion on physical solitude
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
38. Anything punishable by more than a year in jail
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Felonies
39. Words that may be innocent on face - but facts make story damaging
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Libel Perquod
Felonies
Dendrite v. John Does
40. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
Galella v. Onassis
Public figure
Intrusion on physical solitude
Adjudication
41. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Libel
False light
Kincaid v. Gibson
42. The First Amendment protects college students' freedom of expression - and the Hazelwood case should not be applied to college media.
Kincaid v. Gibson
Dendrite v. John Does
State News v. Michigan State University
Actual malice
43. The OMA does not allow public bodies to bypass the law by closing meetings or doing round robin phone calls. universities are not exempt from FOIA in cases of public records.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Pretiral hearing
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
44. Friend of the court.
Civil contempt
Amicus curiae
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
45. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
New York Times v. Sullivan
New York Times v. United States
Injunction
46. Private members of society are not required by the First Amendment to meet the 'actual malice' standard in order to recover damage.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
47. Journalists and citizens must first obey court orders first before seeking appeal - even if they believe the order is unconstitutional
In re Times Publishing Co.
Certiorari
U.S. v. Dickinson
Amicus curiae
48. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
WXYZ v. Hand
Injunction
Pearson v. Dodd
Rouch 2
49. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Tasini v. NYT
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
50. Under FOIA - personell records may be released - subject to 'appropriate redactions.'
5 Areas of privacy
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation