SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. In an invasion of privacy tort - an action that characterizes a person falsely. Often the person is misrepresented by quoting out of context - the careless use of photos or cutlines - or by using a picture from one story as a picture for another.
False light
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Defamation
Public figure
2. There is a First amendment right of access to trials
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
3. Permission given by SCOTUS to allow a case to be appealed
Any civil matter
Kincaid v. Gibson
In re Times Publishing Co.
Certiorari
4. NYT actual malice rule is extended form just public officials to include public figures
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Time Inc. v. Pape
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
McCracken v. Evening News Association
5. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Pretiral hearing
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
False light
6. As long as speech was about a public official (figure) could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject - it is protected by the first amendment.
Intrusion on physical solitude
Libel Per Se
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Galella v. Onassis
7. Criminal matters anything less than a year in jail
Misdemeanor
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Rouch 2
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
8. In Michigan - there's an absolute right of public to be present during jury selection.
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
First amendment
9. School officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.
District Court
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Morse v. Frederick
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
10. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
WXYZ v. Hand
Pearson v. Dodd
District Court
State News v. Michigan State University
11. Federal if between two states (although try to get it back to states) - telecommunications - crossing state lines - anything violating state law
District Court
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Libel Perquod
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
12. Harm done which the law cannot remedy.
Alander
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Irreparable harm
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
13. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
Irreparable harm
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
5 Elements of libel
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
14. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
First amendment
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Qualified privilege
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
15. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Libel
Certiorari
Tickets
16. For presidential searches - MI supreme court ruled universities are 4th arm of government - and must conduct search in public.
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
17. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
New York Times v. Sullivan
Right to publicity
18. The media must make sure that permission is acquired in commercial situations.
Any civil matter
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Defenses of libel
19. Truth is only a defense in privacy cases when it's in a case of _______
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
False light
District Court
20. The government cannot censor. In order to exercise prior restraint - the Government must show sufficient evidence that the publication would cause a 'grave and irreparable' danger.
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
New York Times v. United States
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Adjudication
21. Newspapers do not have an equal time requirement like broadcast has.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Rouch 1
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
McCracken v. Evening News Association
22. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Branzburg v. Hayes
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Pearson v. Dodd
23. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
Herbert v. Lando
Circuit Court
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Clark v. ABC
24. Minor errors do not count as actual malice.
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Time Inc. v. Pape
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Gertz v. Welch
25. Failure to obey an order made by the court
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Civil contempt
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
26. A published article must be so inaccurate that it will have more of an effect on the reader than the literal truth would.
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Intrusion on physical solitude
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
27. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
False light
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
28. A constructive trust is a proper manner of relinquishing the profits of one who abuses a confidential position.
Snepp v. United States
Civil contempt
U.S. v. Dickinson
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
29. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Private figure
Rouch 2
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
30. A reporter has a qualified privilege to report on controversial matters of public interest using reputable sources.
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Intrusion on physical solitude
Herbert v. Lando
Doctrine of neutral reportage
31. Enforced freelancer/copyright actions - and publishers who were doing more than compile the stories had to pay the reporters. Electronic publications (putting it online) makes it a new publication.
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
6th - cincinnati OH
Tasini v. NYT
Time Inc. v. Hill
32. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Public figure
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
33. Reckless disregard for the truth; knowing falsity
Precedent
Actual malice
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
New York Times v. Sullivan
34. If an ongoing - criminal investigation is actively underway - discretion may be used under the exemption claim in FOIA to withhold some documents.
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Felonies
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Libel Perquod
35. Upon the request of the counsel or the victim - you can order that the names of the victim and actor and details of the alleged offense be suppressed until such time as the actor is arraigned - the charge is dismissed - or the case is otherwise concl
Right to publicity
Irreparable harm
Intrusion on physical solitude
MCLA 750.520k
36. No absolute right of access to members of the media. Can be restricted within reason.
Actual malice
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Morse v. Frederick
Galella v. Onassis
37. If a statement 'results in a material change in the meaning conveyed by the statement -' the person who says it can be sued for libel.
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Defamation
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
38. First Amendment protects media to report information from official records available in open court.
U.S. v. Dickinson
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
39. Under FOIA - personell records may be released - subject to 'appropriate redactions.'
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Injunction
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Time Inc. v. Hill
40. In the case where a party challenges the underlying facts that support a trial court's decision - the appellate court must defer to the trial court's view of the facts.
Gag order
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Time Inc. v. Hill
41. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Doctrine of neutral reportage
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Time Inc. v. Firestone
42. in an invasion of privacy tort - an action which occurs when an individual's expectation of privacy or right to be left alone is breached. EX. A reporter lies about his identity to gain access to information they couldn't under normal conditions.
Intrusion on physical solitude
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Kincaid v. Gibson
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
43. A person vs. a person (corporation can be a person too
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
District Court
Any civil matter
44. In an invasion of privacy tort - the right an individual has to profit from their likeness - or to prevent others from gaining value for their own commercial benefit
Pearson v. Dodd
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Fair comment
Right to publicity
45. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Right to publicity
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
46. The declaration of a final judgment based on the evidence presented
Adjudication
5 Elements of libel
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
47. Prevents ISPs from liability except on copyright.
Fourteenth amendment
Dendrite v. John Does
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Summary judgment
48. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Irreparable harm
Felonies
Wilson v. Layne
49. Reading of the charges against a person
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Arraignment
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
50. This protects the media from liability of defamatory statements made during official proceedings. The published story must be a fair and accurate account of what happened.
Pearson v. Dodd
Galella v. Onassis
Intrusion on physical solitude
Qualified privilege