SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. School officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.
District Court
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Morse v. Frederick
MCLA 750.520k
2. Motions for summary judgment is applicable if the publication is not private facts and is newsworthy.
Certiorari
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
3. Newspapers do not have an equal time requirement like broadcast has.
Intrusion on physical solitude
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Libel Perquod
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
4. Permission given by SCOTUS to allow a case to be appealed
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Gag order
Wilson v. Layne
Certiorari
5. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
False light
Any civil matter
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
6. Innocent and negligent misstatement in a newspaper are protected under constitutional freedoms of speech and press.
Arraignment
Time Inc. v. Hill
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
7. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Time Inc. v. Pape
8. The declaration of a final judgment based on the evidence presented
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Adjudication
Rouch 2
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
9. Requires certain information held by various federal and state agencies to be made available to the public unless the information falls under one of the exemptions.
Adjudication
Time Inc. v. Pape
Pearson v. Dodd
Freedom of information act
10. Reconfirmed that you cannot censor news media and its coverage unless theirs a clear and present danger.
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Time Inc. v. Pape
5 Elements of libel
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
11. (privacy) Ex. Beyonce has a thing of Ocean Spray orange juice. Ocean Spray uses the photo as a marketing campaign. Beyonce could go after them.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
12. No liability for publishing information that was lawfully obtained.
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Florida Star v. B.J.F
13. Michigan is in ____ district court in ____ -____
Galella v. Onassis
6th - cincinnati OH
Sixth amendmen
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
14. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
Fair comment
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
15. If an ongoing - criminal investigation is actively underway - discretion may be used under the exemption claim in FOIA to withhold some documents.
Amicus curiae
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Jurisdiction
Galella v. Onassis
16. Compensatory damages are a proper remedy to avoid the injustice under a promissory estoppel claim.
Arraignment
Actual malice
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
17. Truth is only a defense in privacy cases when it's in a case of _______
False light
Fourteenth amendment
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
18. If you get the information from outside sources - you can publish it. MCL 750.520k does not constitute an unlawful prior restraint on publication. Rather - the statute directs that the court file be withheld from the public
Herbert v. Lando
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Private figure
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
19. There is a first amendment right of access to the public to cover and attend trials.
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Actual malice
20. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
New York Times v. United States
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Galella v. Onassis
21. Institutes procedures to ensure every citizen has the right to access government documents - as well as the right to inspect and receive copies of records from state and local government bodies.
Freedom of Information Act
Florida Star v. B.J.F
In re Times Publishing Co.
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
22. An order issued by the court to prevent attorneys and witnesses from discussing the case outside the courtroom - or reporters from publishing information obtained during a court proceeding.
First amendment
Jurisdiction
Fourth amendment
Gag order
23. In Michigan - booking photos are available to the public.
New York Times v. Sullivan
Libel Perquod
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
False light
24. Only in Massachusetts - you can close a preliminary hearing if the case is a sexual assault case.
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Time Inc. v. Hill
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
25. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
U.S. v. Dickinson
False light
26. The OMA does not allow public bodies to bypass the law by closing meetings or doing round robin phone calls. universities are not exempt from FOIA in cases of public records.
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
27. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating it is lewd - indecent or offensive - or have legitimate pedagogical concerns.
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Snepp v. United States
Gag order
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
28. NYT actual malice standard does not extend to private figures. However - it's up to the states to determine what a private figure is - and there's a new standard that says you have to prove harm and damages.
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Gertz v. Welch
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Shepherd v. Maxwell
29. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Branzburg v. Hayes
Snepp v. United States
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Alander
30. The media must make sure that permission is acquired in commercial situations.
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Defenses of libel
Pearson v. Dodd
31. For presidential searches - MI supreme court ruled universities are 4th arm of government - and must conduct search in public.
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Alander
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
32. Set the standard in MI that negligence is needed to prove libel - as the legislature had not acted.
Gag order
Morse v. Frederick
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Rouch 1
33. A form of qualified privilege which gives the media the right to publish articles as long as opinions are based on relevent facts. These aretiles include opinion - columns - editorials - book reviews - movie reviews - etc.
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
First amendment
Fair comment
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
34. Even though university foundations are privately incorporated - they might be subject to comply with FOIA and OMA if the majority of funding comes from the university.
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Defamation
Sixth amendmen
35. There is liability even if the news organization reports both sides - if the sources are not credible.
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Tickets
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
36. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
WXYZ v. Hand
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Libel Perquod
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
37. Plaintiffs are not entitled to an order unmasking an anonymous author when the statements in question cannot support a cause of action for defamation.
Gag order
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Qualified privilege
38. Harm done which the law cannot remedy.
Pearson v. Dodd
Freedom of information act
Irreparable harm
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
39. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Private figure
Circuit Court
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Snepp v. United States
40. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Alander
Public figure
41. (privacy) a. Because of who you are - you have a right to profit from your image b. Endorsements
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Gag order
Right to publicity
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
42. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Herbert v. Lando
Evening News Association v. Troy
43. Enforced freelancer/copyright actions - and publishers who were doing more than compile the stories had to pay the reporters. Electronic publications (putting it online) makes it a new publication.
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Tasini v. NYT
MCLA 750.520k
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
44. In Michigan - there's an absolute right of public to be present during jury selection.
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
45. Prevents ISPs from liability except on copyright.
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Irreparable harm
Time Inc. v. Pape
Dendrite v. John Does
46. Under FOIA - personell records may be released - subject to 'appropriate redactions.'
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
In re Times Publishing Co.
Time Inc. v. Firestone
47. The press has no greater constitutional right to access penal facilities than any member of the general public
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
State News v. Michigan State University
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
48. A published article must be so inaccurate that it will have more of an effect on the reader than the literal truth would.
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Alander
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Shepherd v. Maxwell
49. Guarantees freedoms of speech - religion - press and assembly.
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Right to publicity
First amendment
Pretiral hearing
50. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Tickets
Actual Damages
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Pearson v. Dodd