SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Written defamation which causes injury to another's reputation
Circuit Court
Libel
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
2. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Time Inc. v. Firestone
District Court
Pretiral hearing
3. Damages presumed - Falsely accusing someone of a crime - Statements concerning race or political belief - Damaging someone in their business - Ex. calling brain surgeon 'butterfingers'
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Libel Per Se
Dendrite v. John Does
4. When you have a private figure plaintiff - even though state standards controls - if it's a matter of public concern - the burden of proof shifts from the defendant who no longer has to prove truth - to the plaintiff who has to prove falsity of what
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Intrusion on physical solitude
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Libel Per Se
5. In the case where a party challenges the underlying facts that support a trial court's decision - the appellate court must defer to the trial court's view of the facts.
Alander
Intrusion on physical solitude
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
6. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
Rouch 1
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
First amendment
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
7. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
MCLA 750.520k
Herbert v. Lando
Actual Damages
Shepherd v. Maxwell
8. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
Circuit Court
Summary judgment
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
False light
9. A published article must be so inaccurate that it will have more of an effect on the reader than the literal truth would.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Time Inc. v. Hill
Qualified privilege
10. In an invasion of privacy tort - an action that characterizes a person falsely. Often the person is misrepresented by quoting out of context - the careless use of photos or cutlines - or by using a picture from one story as a picture for another.
False light
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
11. Motions for summary judgment is applicable if the publication is not private facts and is newsworthy.
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Actual Damages
Felonies
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
12. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
Any civil matter
Public figure
Actual Damages
Tasini v. NYT
13. First Amendment protects media to report information from official records available in open court.
Preliminary hearing
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Amicus curiae
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
14. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
Amicus curiae
Fair comment
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
5 Elements of libel
15. Guarantees people the right to be secure in their homes and property against unreasonable searches and seizures. Also protects against the issuance of a warrant without probable cause.
Circuit Court
State News v. Michigan State University
Fourth amendment
Defenses of libel
16. Friend of the court.
Amicus curiae
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Defamation
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
17. Requires certain information held by various federal and state agencies to be made available to the public unless the information falls under one of the exemptions.
Freedom of information act
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Fourteenth amendment
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
18. Judge has an absolute duty to ensure fair trial rights. Judge must be able to control what's going on in the courtroom.
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Right to publicity
19. Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency - 2. Intrusion on physical solitude - 3. False light - 4. Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit - 5. Right to publicity
False light
5 Areas of privacy
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Injunction
20. Protects all 'persons' from deprivation of life - liberty or property without due process of law.
Shepherd v. Maxwell
6th - cincinnati OH
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Fourteenth amendment
21. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Rouch 1
22. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Precedent
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Kincaid v. Gibson
23. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Libel Perquod
Dendrite v. John Does
24. Set the standard in MI that negligence is needed to prove libel - as the legislature had not acted.
Clark v. ABC
Precedent
Rouch 1
Misdemeanor
25. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Pretiral hearing
Defamation
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
26. There is a first amendment right of access to the public to cover and attend trials.
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Gag order
Certiorari
27. The speech and debate clause only covers members of congress within the halls of congress - not outside of it. I.E. press releases - speeches - etc.
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Adjudication
District Court
Tasini v. NYT
28. Harm done which the law cannot remedy.
Irreparable harm
In re Times Publishing Co.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Defenses of libel
29. Police have to disclose incident report records. Do have to keep submitting FOIAs.
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
State News v. Michigan State University
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Fourteenth amendment
30. This protects the media from liability of defamatory statements made during official proceedings. The published story must be a fair and accurate account of what happened.
Dendrite v. John Does
Qualified privilege
Fair comment
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
31. Permission given by SCOTUS to allow a case to be appealed
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Fourteenth amendment
Civil contempt
Certiorari
32. An order issued by the court to prevent attorneys and witnesses from discussing the case outside the courtroom - or reporters from publishing information obtained during a court proceeding.
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Time Inc. v. Hill
Gag order
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
33. Journalists and citizens must first obey court orders first before seeking appeal - even if they believe the order is unconstitutional
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
U.S. v. Dickinson
Actual malice
5 Elements of libel
34. Innocent and negligent misstatement in a newspaper are protected under constitutional freedoms of speech and press.
Morse v. Frederick
Fourth amendment
False light
Time Inc. v. Hill
35. Under FOIA - personell records may be released - subject to 'appropriate redactions.'
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Private figure
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Certiorari
36. (privacy) There are areas around you that are a 'zone of privacy'
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Adjudication
Intrusion on physical solitude
Right to publicity
37. The power of authority of a particular court to hear and adjudicate matters in dispute
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Jurisdiction
38. What is shot in public place is fine - but if there is intrusion on physical solitude it is not protected.
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Gertz v. Welch
Defamation
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
39. School officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Morse v. Frederick
Preliminary hearing
40. (privacy) Ex. Beyonce has a thing of Ocean Spray orange juice. Ocean Spray uses the photo as a marketing campaign. Beyonce could go after them.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
41. Minor errors do not count as actual malice.
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
MCLA 750.520k
Time Inc. v. Pape
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
42. As long as speech was about a public official (figure) could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject - it is protected by the first amendment.
Shepherd v. Maxwell
District Court
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Misdemeanor
43. If an ongoing - criminal investigation is actively underway - discretion may be used under the exemption claim in FOIA to withhold some documents.
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Gertz v. Welch
Misdemeanor
44. Anything punishable by more than a year in jail
Felonies
Adjudication
Gertz v. Welch
False light
45. Money damages awarded to the injured party as compensation for a specific loss
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
False light
Actual Damages
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
46. The press has no greater constitutional right to access penal facilities than any member of the general public
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
MCLA 750.520k
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Private figure
47. NYT actual malice standard does not extend to private figures. However - it's up to the states to determine what a private figure is - and there's a new standard that says you have to prove harm and damages.
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Time Inc. v. Pape
Gertz v. Welch
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
48. To claim exemption for investigative records - they must show how disclosure would interfere with proceedings. The burden of proof is on the party claiming exemption.
Evening News Association v. Troy
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
First amendment
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
49. For purposes of divorce - there may be some elements of a public person's private life that make them a private figure.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Defenses of libel
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Fair comment
50. Only in Massachusetts - you can close a preliminary hearing if the case is a sexual assault case.
Defamation
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Adjudication
First amendment