SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Guarantees freedoms of speech - religion - press and assembly.
Libel Per Se
Tasini v. NYT
Gag order
First amendment
2. There is liability even if the news organization reports both sides - if the sources are not credible.
Libel Per Se
Wilson v. Layne
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Precedent
3. A constructive trust is a proper manner of relinquishing the profits of one who abuses a confidential position.
False light
Time Inc. v. Pape
Snepp v. United States
Any civil matter
4. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating an educational purpose.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Actual Damages
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
5. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Public figure
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
6. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Summary judgment
Libel Perquod
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
7. Protects all 'persons' from deprivation of life - liberty or property without due process of law.
Arraignment
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Rouch 2
Fourteenth amendment
8. Money damages awarded to the injured party as compensation for a specific loss
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Actual Damages
9. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Sixth amendmen
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
6th - cincinnati OH
10. Failure to obey an order made by the court
Actual malice
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Civil contempt
U.S. v. Dickinson
11. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Qualified privilege
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Alander
12. Friend of the court.
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Amicus curiae
13. In an invasion of privacy tort - the right an individual has to profit from their likeness - or to prevent others from gaining value for their own commercial benefit
Right to publicity
Rouch 1
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Time Inc. v. Hill
14. Newspapers do not have an equal time requirement like broadcast has.
Arraignment
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Preliminary hearing
15. If the information is lawfully obtained - the defendant can't be held in contempt of court.
Libel Perquod
In re Times Publishing Co.
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
16. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Defenses of libel
Snepp v. United States
17. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
18. A proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
19. (Privacy) Ex. Kim Kardashian's sex tape
Actual malice
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Herbert v. Lando
Galella v. Onassis
20. A judgment made by the court before or during a trial. This judgment is in repsonse to a motion by the plaintiff or defendant - who claims there is not enough evidence or there is no dispute that the information given is fact.
Pretiral hearing
Actual Damages
Summary judgment
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
21. If a publication accurately prints something from a false public record document - they cannot be sued for libel.
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Intrusion on physical solitude
Summary judgment
22. Guarantees people the right to be secure in their homes and property against unreasonable searches and seizures. Also protects against the issuance of a warrant without probable cause.
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Fourteenth amendment
Fourth amendment
Time Inc. v. Pape
23. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Sixth amendmen
WXYZ v. Hand
Tasini v. NYT
24. (privacy) a. Because of who you are - you have a right to profit from your image b. Endorsements
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Right to publicity
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
25. In the case where a party challenges the underlying facts that support a trial court's decision - the appellate court must defer to the trial court's view of the facts.
Fourth amendment
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Public figure
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
26. (privacy) Ex. Beyonce has a thing of Ocean Spray orange juice. Ocean Spray uses the photo as a marketing campaign. Beyonce could go after them.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
27. Have to have an open meeting when interviewing candidates for a public position.
Time Inc. v. Pape
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Preliminary hearing
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
28. When you have a private figure plaintiff - even though state standards controls - if it's a matter of public concern - the burden of proof shifts from the defendant who no longer has to prove truth - to the plaintiff who has to prove falsity of what
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
29. There is a first amendment right of access to the public to cover and attend trials.
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
New York Times v. United States
Time Inc. v. Pape
30. If you knowingly run ads that advocate criminal activity - you can be held liable. Got off on the first case - but on the second case they should have known better.
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Defenses of libel
Rouch 1
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
31. Incidental use of someone's image cold be an invasion of privacy or defamation.
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Fourth amendment
Arraignment
Clark v. ABC
32. Series of pre trail hearings: court created devices to weed out inadmissible evidence prior to trial. Often determine bargaining of prosecution and defendant to come up with plea bargain. Most cases are ended with plea bargain and don't go to trial.
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Circuit Court
Public figure
Actual malice
33. The burden of proof imposed on public officials extends to anyone involved in a matter of public concern - regardless of whether they were famous or unknown.
Certiorari
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
34. Anything punishable by more than a year in jail
Private figure
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Felonies
Pearson v. Dodd
35. in an invasion of privacy tort - an action which occurs when an individual's expectation of privacy or right to be left alone is breached. EX. A reporter lies about his identity to gain access to information they couldn't under normal conditions.
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Intrusion on physical solitude
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
36. First Amendment protects media to report information from official records available in open court.
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
New York Times v. Sullivan
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
37. Private members of society are not required by the First Amendment to meet the 'actual malice' standard in order to recover damage.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
38. The declaration of a final judgment based on the evidence presented
Right to publicity
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Adjudication
39. The government cannot censor. In order to exercise prior restraint - the Government must show sufficient evidence that the publication would cause a 'grave and irreparable' danger.
Arraignment
New York Times v. United States
Galella v. Onassis
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
40. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Clark v. ABC
Rouch 1
Public figure
41. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
Time Inc. v. Hill
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Pearson v. Dodd
42. There is a First amendment right of access to trials
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
43. Upon the request of the counsel or the victim - you can order that the names of the victim and actor and details of the alleged offense be suppressed until such time as the actor is arraigned - the charge is dismissed - or the case is otherwise concl
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
MCLA 750.520k
44. Motions for summary judgment is applicable if the publication is not private facts and is newsworthy.
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Misdemeanor
Defenses of libel
McCracken v. Evening News Association
45. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
Rouch 2
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Amicus curiae
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
46. School officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.
Summary judgment
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Morse v. Frederick
47. NYT actual malice rule is extended form just public officials to include public figures
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Defamation
48. Criminal matters anything less than a year in jail
Misdemeanor
Time Inc. v. Pape
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Florida Star v. B.J.F
49. Truth is only a defense in privacy cases when it's in a case of _______
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
False light
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
50. A reporter has a qualified privilege to report on controversial matters of public interest using reputable sources.
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Branzburg v. Hayes
Sixth amendmen
Tasini v. NYT