SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
Intrusion on physical solitude
Adjudication
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
McCracken v. Evening News Association
2. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
3. The First Amendment protects college students' freedom of expression - and the Hazelwood case should not be applied to college media.
False light
Kincaid v. Gibson
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Alander
4. Newspaper must have known material falsity - material falsity became standard of proof in Michigan.
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Rouch 2
Gag order
Right to publicity
5. (Privacy) Ex. Kim Kardashian's sex tape
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Freedom of information act
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
6. A published article must be so inaccurate that it will have more of an effect on the reader than the literal truth would.
Libel Perquod
Defamation
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
McCracken v. Evening News Association
7. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Pretiral hearing
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Alander
Arraignment
8. (privacy) There are areas around you that are a 'zone of privacy'
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Arraignment
Intrusion on physical solitude
6th - cincinnati OH
9. If a statement 'results in a material change in the meaning conveyed by the statement -' the person who says it can be sued for libel.
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
5 Areas of privacy
10. No liability for publishing information that was lawfully obtained.
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Florida Star v. B.J.F
New York Times v. United States
Actual malice
11. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
6th - cincinnati OH
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Defamation
First amendment
12. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Right to publicity
13. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
Right to publicity
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
WXYZ v. Hand
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
14. in an invasion of privacy tort - an action which occurs when an individual's expectation of privacy or right to be left alone is breached. EX. A reporter lies about his identity to gain access to information they couldn't under normal conditions.
Jurisdiction
Intrusion on physical solitude
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Clark v. ABC
15. Police have to disclose incident report records. Do have to keep submitting FOIAs.
False light
Adjudication
State News v. Michigan State University
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
16. A proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
Actual malice
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
State News v. Michigan State University
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
17. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Clark v. ABC
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
False light
Sixth amendmen
18. Only in Massachusetts - you can close a preliminary hearing if the case is a sexual assault case.
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Amicus curiae
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
False light
19. The declaration of a final judgment based on the evidence presented
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Adjudication
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Fourth amendment
20. NYT actual malice rule is extended form just public officials to include public figures
False light
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
First amendment
21. Words that may be innocent on face - but facts make story damaging
Injunction
Libel Perquod
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Defamation
22. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
False light
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Misdemeanor
23. Friend of the court.
Fourteenth amendment
Amicus curiae
Doctrine of neutral reportage
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
24. In Michigan - booking photos are available to the public.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Injunction
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
25. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
Fair comment
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
26. A court order preventing a person or group from doing or continuing to do a specific act.
Libel Perquod
Branzburg v. Hayes
False light
Injunction
27. In an invasion of privacy tort - the right an individual has to profit from their likeness - or to prevent others from gaining value for their own commercial benefit
Right to publicity
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Rouch 2
28. Lowest court handles: Tickets - civil matter - Misdemeanor - Felonies
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
False light
District Court
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
29. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
5 Elements of libel
District Court
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
MCLA 750.520k
30. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
False light
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
31. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
Precedent
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
6th - cincinnati OH
32. For purposes of divorce - there may be some elements of a public person's private life that make them a private figure.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Kincaid v. Gibson
New York Times v. Sullivan
33. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
New York Times v. Sullivan
Wilson v. Layne
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
False light
34. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
New York Times v. Sullivan
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
New York Times v. United States
35. Any communication - true or false - which exposes a person to hatred - ridicule or contempt. the person's reputation is harmed or damaged
Defamation
Wilson v. Layne
Freedom of information act
Libel
36. In Michigan - there's an absolute right of public to be present during jury selection.
Right to publicity
Gannett v. DePasquale
False light
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
37. An order issued by the court to prevent attorneys and witnesses from discussing the case outside the courtroom - or reporters from publishing information obtained during a court proceeding.
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Gag order
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Actual malice
38. This protects the media from liability of defamatory statements made during official proceedings. The published story must be a fair and accurate account of what happened.
Qualified privilege
Kincaid v. Gibson
Time Inc. v. Pape
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
39. Innocent and negligent misstatement in a newspaper are protected under constitutional freedoms of speech and press.
Time Inc. v. Hill
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Precedent
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
40. Judge has an absolute duty to ensure fair trial rights. Judge must be able to control what's going on in the courtroom.
Time Inc. v. Pape
Injunction
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Shepherd v. Maxwell
41. Motions for summary judgment is applicable if the publication is not private facts and is newsworthy.
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Injunction
42. The Sixth Amendment rights of a defendant outweigh the First Amendment of the press in cases where the press can have prejudicial outcome of the defendant's trial.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Any civil matter
Gannett v. DePasquale
Arraignment
43. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
Fair comment
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Right to publicity
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
44. Published work of copyrighted material is a violation and isn't protected under Section 107 as 'fair use.'
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Defenses of libel
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
45. A person vs. a person (corporation can be a person too
Rouch 1
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Any civil matter
46. To claim exemption for investigative records - they must show how disclosure would interfere with proceedings. The burden of proof is on the party claiming exemption.
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Time Inc. v. Firestone
5 Elements of libel
Evening News Association v. Troy
47. Recognized first amendment right of privacy for private figures against media.
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
48. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Rouch 1
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Pearson v. Dodd
49. The press has no greater constitutional right to access penal facilities than any member of the general public
WXYZ v. Hand
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Public figure
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
50. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Intrusion on physical solitude
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Tickets
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton