SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Private figure
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Freedom of information act
2. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
WXYZ v. Hand
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
3. hearing where the judge decides whether or not there is sufficient evidence to prove a crime. In michigan - takes place in district court
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Sixth amendmen
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Preliminary hearing
4. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
5. in an invasion of privacy tort - an action which occurs when an individual's expectation of privacy or right to be left alone is breached. EX. A reporter lies about his identity to gain access to information they couldn't under normal conditions.
Private figure
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Intrusion on physical solitude
District Court
6. Protects all 'persons' from deprivation of life - liberty or property without due process of law.
First amendment
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
District Court
Fourteenth amendment
7. Have to have an open meeting when interviewing candidates for a public position.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
8. Newspaper must have known material falsity - material falsity became standard of proof in Michigan.
Actual malice
Fourth amendment
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Rouch 2
9. Criminal matters anything less than a year in jail
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Public figure
Misdemeanor
Rouch 2
10. If a statement 'results in a material change in the meaning conveyed by the statement -' the person who says it can be sued for libel.
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Gertz v. Welch
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Herbert v. Lando
11. Published work of copyrighted material is a violation and isn't protected under Section 107 as 'fair use.'
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
12. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating it is lewd - indecent or offensive - or have legitimate pedagogical concerns.
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Summary judgment
Defamation
Fourth amendment
13. A judgment made by the court before or during a trial. This judgment is in repsonse to a motion by the plaintiff or defendant - who claims there is not enough evidence or there is no dispute that the information given is fact.
Rouch 2
Gannett v. DePasquale
Summary judgment
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
14. A constructive trust is a proper manner of relinquishing the profits of one who abuses a confidential position.
Snepp v. United States
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Intrusion on physical solitude
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
15. Opinion - privilege - fair comment - truth - constitutional defenses
Preliminary hearing
Defenses of libel
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Arraignment
16. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
False light
District Court
Right to publicity
17. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Certiorari
18. The speech and debate clause only covers members of congress within the halls of congress - not outside of it. I.E. press releases - speeches - etc.
Gag order
Actual malice
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
MCLA 750.520k
19. Enforced freelancer/copyright actions - and publishers who were doing more than compile the stories had to pay the reporters. Electronic publications (putting it online) makes it a new publication.
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
6th - cincinnati OH
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Tasini v. NYT
20. If you get the information from outside sources - you can publish it. MCL 750.520k does not constitute an unlawful prior restraint on publication. Rather - the statute directs that the court file be withheld from the public
Snepp v. United States
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Sixth amendmen
21. Harm done which the law cannot remedy.
Summary judgment
WXYZ v. Hand
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Irreparable harm
22. NYT actual malice standard does not extend to private figures. However - it's up to the states to determine what a private figure is - and there's a new standard that says you have to prove harm and damages.
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
False light
Intrusion on physical solitude
Gertz v. Welch
23. If an ongoing - criminal investigation is actively underway - discretion may be used under the exemption claim in FOIA to withhold some documents.
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Misdemeanor
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
24. Reading of the charges against a person
Circuit Court
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Arraignment
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
25. An order issued by the court to prevent attorneys and witnesses from discussing the case outside the courtroom - or reporters from publishing information obtained during a court proceeding.
Gag order
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Rouch 1
Freedom of Information Act
26. Minor errors do not count as actual malice.
Right to publicity
In re Times Publishing Co.
Time Inc. v. Pape
False light
27. Reconfirmed that you cannot censor news media and its coverage unless theirs a clear and present danger.
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Fourteenth amendment
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
28. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
False light
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Civil contempt
Tickets
29. The burden of proof imposed on public officials extends to anyone involved in a matter of public concern - regardless of whether they were famous or unknown.
State News v. Michigan State University
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
30. Incidental use of someone's image cold be an invasion of privacy or defamation.
Private figure
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Clark v. ABC
Summary judgment
31. Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency - 2. Intrusion on physical solitude - 3. False light - 4. Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit - 5. Right to publicity
Injunction
5 Areas of privacy
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Wilson v. Layne
32. Money damages awarded to the injured party as compensation for a specific loss
Irreparable harm
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Actual Damages
Fourteenth amendment
33. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
Shepherd v. Maxwell
New York Times v. United States
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Right to publicity
34. If a quote is altered - in order for a publication to be sued the plaintiff must prove the meaning portrayed in altered quote is dramatically different than the actual quote
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
U.S. v. Dickinson
35. (Privacy) Ex. Kim Kardashian's sex tape
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Summary judgment
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
36. If the information is lawfully obtained - the defendant can't be held in contempt of court.
District Court
Galella v. Onassis
In re Times Publishing Co.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
37. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Actual Damages
Branzburg v. Hayes
38. A court order preventing a person or group from doing or continuing to do a specific act.
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Defamation
Injunction
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
39. Broadcasters are immune from liability if political candidates defame someone while under section 315
Herbert v. Lando
Morse v. Frederick
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
40. Only in Massachusetts - you can close a preliminary hearing if the case is a sexual assault case.
Rouch 1
6th - cincinnati OH
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
41. As long as speech was about a public official (figure) could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject - it is protected by the first amendment.
Fourth amendment
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
42. The declaration of a final judgment based on the evidence presented
First amendment
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Adjudication
Right to publicity
43. First Amendment protects media to report information from official records available in open court.
Gag order
Pretiral hearing
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
44. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
MCLA 750.520k
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Herbert v. Lando
Injunction
45. Private members of society are not required by the First Amendment to meet the 'actual malice' standard in order to recover damage.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
46. If you knowingly run ads that advocate criminal activity - you can be held liable. Got off on the first case - but on the second case they should have known better.
Right to publicity
Right to publicity
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
47. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Amicus curiae
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Pretiral hearing
48. Motions for summary judgment is applicable if the publication is not private facts and is newsworthy.
Fourth amendment
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Libel Per Se
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
49. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
Wilson v. Layne
Pretiral hearing
False light
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
50. Judge has an absolute duty to ensure fair trial rights. Judge must be able to control what's going on in the courtroom.
Summary judgment
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Jurisdiction
Shepherd v. Maxwell