SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Intrusion on physical solitude
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Pretiral hearing
2. Reconfirmed that you cannot censor news media and its coverage unless theirs a clear and present danger.
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Adjudication
Civil contempt
3. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
5 Elements of libel
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Right to publicity
4. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
Rouch 1
New York Times v. Sullivan
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Snepp v. United States
5. A form of qualified privilege which gives the media the right to publish articles as long as opinions are based on relevent facts. These aretiles include opinion - columns - editorials - book reviews - movie reviews - etc.
Amicus curiae
Fair comment
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
6. Newspaper must have known material falsity - material falsity became standard of proof in Michigan.
Rouch 2
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Defenses of libel
Defamation
7. If the information is lawfully obtained - the defendant can't be held in contempt of court.
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
False light
In re Times Publishing Co.
New York Times v. United States
8. Failure to obey an order made by the court
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Civil contempt
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Clark v. ABC
9. Motions for summary judgment is applicable if the publication is not private facts and is newsworthy.
Private figure
Summary judgment
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Galella v. Onassis
10. When you have a private figure plaintiff - even though state standards controls - if it's a matter of public concern - the burden of proof shifts from the defendant who no longer has to prove truth - to the plaintiff who has to prove falsity of what
Morse v. Frederick
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
District Court
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
11. The declaration of a final judgment based on the evidence presented
Adjudication
Preliminary hearing
WXYZ v. Hand
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
12. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
Arraignment
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
WXYZ v. Hand
In re Times Publishing Co.
13. Prevents ISPs from liability except on copyright.
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Dendrite v. John Does
First amendment
State News v. Michigan State University
14. Newspapers do not have an equal time requirement like broadcast has.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Pearson v. Dodd
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Intrusion on physical solitude
15. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
U.S. v. Dickinson
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
16. As long as speech was about a public official (figure) could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject - it is protected by the first amendment.
Amicus curiae
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Gertz v. Welch
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
17. A reporter has a qualified privilege to report on controversial matters of public interest using reputable sources.
Kincaid v. Gibson
Doctrine of neutral reportage
New York Times v. United States
Gertz v. Welch
18. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Circuit Court
WXYZ v. Hand
Wilson v. Layne
19. (privacy) Ex. Beyonce has a thing of Ocean Spray orange juice. Ocean Spray uses the photo as a marketing campaign. Beyonce could go after them.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
20. Plaintiffs are not entitled to an order unmasking an anonymous author when the statements in question cannot support a cause of action for defamation.
Libel Per Se
Private figure
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
21. Recognized first amendment right of privacy for private figures against media.
U.S. v. Dickinson
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
22. in an invasion of privacy tort - an action which occurs when an individual's expectation of privacy or right to be left alone is breached. EX. A reporter lies about his identity to gain access to information they couldn't under normal conditions.
Arraignment
Intrusion on physical solitude
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
False light
23. Published work of copyrighted material is a violation and isn't protected under Section 107 as 'fair use.'
Snepp v. United States
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Felonies
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
24. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Herbert v. Lando
Rouch 1
Intrusion on physical solitude
25. School officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Morse v. Frederick
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Precedent
26. Under FOIA - personell records may be released - subject to 'appropriate redactions.'
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Right to publicity
District Court
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
27. The First Amendment protects college students' freedom of expression - and the Hazelwood case should not be applied to college media.
Fourteenth amendment
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Kincaid v. Gibson
28. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Alander
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Tickets
MCLA 750.520k
29. A proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Intrusion on physical solitude
6th - cincinnati OH
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
30. If a quote is altered - in order for a publication to be sued the plaintiff must prove the meaning portrayed in altered quote is dramatically different than the actual quote
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Intrusion on physical solitude
Injunction
False light
31. If you get the information from outside sources - you can publish it. MCL 750.520k does not constitute an unlawful prior restraint on publication. Rather - the statute directs that the court file be withheld from the public
6th - cincinnati OH
Fair comment
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
32. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating it is lewd - indecent or offensive - or have legitimate pedagogical concerns.
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Certiorari
33. Requires certain information held by various federal and state agencies to be made available to the public unless the information falls under one of the exemptions.
Freedom of information act
WXYZ v. Hand
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
34. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
Fourteenth amendment
Preliminary hearing
5 Areas of privacy
False light
35. Opinion - privilege - fair comment - truth - constitutional defenses
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Defenses of libel
Libel
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
36. Private members of society are not required by the First Amendment to meet the 'actual malice' standard in order to recover damage.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
37. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Alander
Time Inc. v. Hill
5 Areas of privacy
38. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
Libel
Actual malice
Precedent
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
39. Truth is only a defense in privacy cases when it's in a case of _______
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Alander
False light
Herbert v. Lando
40. Harm done which the law cannot remedy.
WXYZ v. Hand
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Irreparable harm
Tasini v. NYT
41. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Irreparable harm
Branzburg v. Hayes
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
42. Reckless disregard for the truth; knowing falsity
Gannett v. DePasquale
Actual malice
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
43. (Privacy) Ex. Kim Kardashian's sex tape
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Actual malice
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
44. No liability for publishing information that was lawfully obtained.
In re Times Publishing Co.
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Precedent
45. NYT actual malice standard does not extend to private figures. However - it's up to the states to determine what a private figure is - and there's a new standard that says you have to prove harm and damages.
Kincaid v. Gibson
Fourteenth amendment
Gertz v. Welch
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
46. Have to have an open meeting when interviewing candidates for a public position.
Dendrite v. John Does
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Shepherd v. Maxwell
47. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Any civil matter
Pretiral hearing
Pearson v. Dodd
5 Elements of libel
48. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating an educational purpose.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
First amendment
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
District Court
49. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
50. Anything punishable by more than a year in jail
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Dendrite v. John Does
Felonies