SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. The government cannot censor. In order to exercise prior restraint - the Government must show sufficient evidence that the publication would cause a 'grave and irreparable' danger.
Amicus curiae
New York Times v. United States
Public figure
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
2. Journalists and citizens must first obey court orders first before seeking appeal - even if they believe the order is unconstitutional
U.S. v. Dickinson
Libel Perquod
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
District Court
3. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
Certiorari
Public figure
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
4. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
False light
Misdemeanor
5. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
Circuit Court
Adjudication
False light
Freedom of information act
6. If a quote is altered - in order for a publication to be sued the plaintiff must prove the meaning portrayed in altered quote is dramatically different than the actual quote
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Actual Damages
7. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Pearson v. Dodd
Arraignment
Libel
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
8. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Tickets
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
9. In an invasion of privacy tort - an action that characterizes a person falsely. Often the person is misrepresented by quoting out of context - the careless use of photos or cutlines - or by using a picture from one story as a picture for another.
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
False light
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Snepp v. United States
10. When you have a private figure plaintiff - even though state standards controls - if it's a matter of public concern - the burden of proof shifts from the defendant who no longer has to prove truth - to the plaintiff who has to prove falsity of what
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Alander
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Morse v. Frederick
11. Harm done which the law cannot remedy.
Irreparable harm
Right to publicity
Defenses of libel
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
12. Private members of society are not required by the First Amendment to meet the 'actual malice' standard in order to recover damage.
13. The Sixth Amendment rights of a defendant outweigh the First Amendment of the press in cases where the press can have prejudicial outcome of the defendant's trial.
Gannett v. DePasquale
MCLA 750.520k
In re Times Publishing Co.
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
14. Reconfirmed that you cannot censor news media and its coverage unless theirs a clear and present danger.
Felonies
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
U.S. v. Dickinson
15. Guarantees freedoms of speech - religion - press and assembly.
False light
Libel Per Se
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
First amendment
16. Permission given by SCOTUS to allow a case to be appealed
False light
Certiorari
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Doctrine of neutral reportage
17. Enforced freelancer/copyright actions - and publishers who were doing more than compile the stories had to pay the reporters. Electronic publications (putting it online) makes it a new publication.
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Tasini v. NYT
Fourteenth amendment
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
18. What is shot in public place is fine - but if there is intrusion on physical solitude it is not protected.
Gag order
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
19. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
Circuit Court
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Summary judgment
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
20. Anything punishable by more than a year in jail
Felonies
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
21. There is a first amendment right of access to the public to cover and attend trials.
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Adjudication
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Pearson v. Dodd
22. The burden of proof imposed on public officials extends to anyone involved in a matter of public concern - regardless of whether they were famous or unknown.
District Court
District Court
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
23. Prevents ISPs from liability except on copyright.
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Dendrite v. John Does
24. A published article must be so inaccurate that it will have more of an effect on the reader than the literal truth would.
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Private figure
25. Newspapers do not have an equal time requirement like broadcast has.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
26. For presidential searches - MI supreme court ruled universities are 4th arm of government - and must conduct search in public.
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
False light
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Any civil matter
27. Recognized first amendment right of privacy for private figures against media.
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
First amendment
New York Times v. Sullivan
Snepp v. United States
28. (privacy) Ex. Beyonce has a thing of Ocean Spray orange juice. Ocean Spray uses the photo as a marketing campaign. Beyonce could go after them.
29. Guarantees people the right to be secure in their homes and property against unreasonable searches and seizures. Also protects against the issuance of a warrant without probable cause.
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Fourth amendment
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
False light
30. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating an educational purpose.
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
31. Requires certain information held by various federal and state agencies to be made available to the public unless the information falls under one of the exemptions.
Galella v. Onassis
Freedom of information act
Actual malice
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
32. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
New York Times v. Sullivan
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
33. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Herbert v. Lando
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
34. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
U.S. v. Dickinson
Private figure
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
35. in an invasion of privacy tort - an action which occurs when an individual's expectation of privacy or right to be left alone is breached. EX. A reporter lies about his identity to gain access to information they couldn't under normal conditions.
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Rouch 2
False light
Intrusion on physical solitude
36. There is liability even if the news organization reports both sides - if the sources are not credible.
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Circuit Court
37. Motions for summary judgment is applicable if the publication is not private facts and is newsworthy.
Injunction
Time Inc. v. Hill
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
38. (Privacy) Ex. Kim Kardashian's sex tape
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
U.S. v. Dickinson
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
6th - cincinnati OH
39. As long as speech was about a public official (figure) could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject - it is protected by the first amendment.
Qualified privilege
Pretiral hearing
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Time Inc. v. Firestone
40. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Clark v. ABC
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Circuit Court
41. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
Certiorari
Public figure
WXYZ v. Hand
Preliminary hearing
42. Innocent and negligent misstatement in a newspaper are protected under constitutional freedoms of speech and press.
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Time Inc. v. Hill
43. Protects all 'persons' from deprivation of life - liberty or property without due process of law.
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
In re Times Publishing Co.
Defenses of libel
Fourteenth amendment
44. Any communication - true or false - which exposes a person to hatred - ridicule or contempt. the person's reputation is harmed or damaged
Sixth amendmen
Defamation
Defenses of libel
Gag order
45. Set the standard in MI that negligence is needed to prove libel - as the legislature had not acted.
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Civil contempt
Rouch 1
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
46. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating it is lewd - indecent or offensive - or have legitimate pedagogical concerns.
Right to publicity
Gertz v. Welch
Fair comment
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
47. Failure to obey an order made by the court
In re Times Publishing Co.
Gertz v. Welch
Civil contempt
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
48. hearing where the judge decides whether or not there is sufficient evidence to prove a crime. In michigan - takes place in district court
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Preliminary hearing
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
49. If a statement 'results in a material change in the meaning conveyed by the statement -' the person who says it can be sued for libel.
Alander
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Snepp v. United States
50. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
McCracken v. Evening News Association