SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. No liability for publishing information that was lawfully obtained.
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Wilson v. Layne
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
2. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Tickets
Certiorari
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
New York Times v. Sullivan
3. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Herbert v. Lando
Certiorari
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
4. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Intrusion on physical solitude
Herbert v. Lando
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Kincaid v. Gibson
5. Upon the request of the counsel or the victim - you can order that the names of the victim and actor and details of the alleged offense be suppressed until such time as the actor is arraigned - the charge is dismissed - or the case is otherwise concl
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
MCLA 750.520k
Jurisdiction
Defenses of libel
6. Requires certain information held by various federal and state agencies to be made available to the public unless the information falls under one of the exemptions.
Circuit Court
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Freedom of information act
7. Lowest court handles: Tickets - civil matter - Misdemeanor - Felonies
McCracken v. Evening News Association
District Court
6th - cincinnati OH
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
8. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
MCLA 750.520k
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
9. (Privacy) Ex. Kim Kardashian's sex tape
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
First amendment
Pretiral hearing
Libel Per Se
10. (privacy) a. Because of who you are - you have a right to profit from your image b. Endorsements
Right to publicity
MCLA 750.520k
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
11. If you get the information from outside sources - you can publish it. MCL 750.520k does not constitute an unlawful prior restraint on publication. Rather - the statute directs that the court file be withheld from the public
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Irreparable harm
Doctrine of neutral reportage
12. NYT actual malice standard does not extend to private figures. However - it's up to the states to determine what a private figure is - and there's a new standard that says you have to prove harm and damages.
Gertz v. Welch
Qualified privilege
Pearson v. Dodd
Fourth amendment
13. What is shot in public place is fine - but if there is intrusion on physical solitude it is not protected.
Any civil matter
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
MCLA 750.520k
Rouch 2
14. Even though university foundations are privately incorporated - they might be subject to comply with FOIA and OMA if the majority of funding comes from the university.
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Irreparable harm
Rouch 2
15. hearing where the judge decides whether or not there is sufficient evidence to prove a crime. In michigan - takes place in district court
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Any civil matter
Preliminary hearing
16. Opinion - privilege - fair comment - truth - constitutional defenses
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Freedom of Information Act
Defenses of libel
Actual malice
17. Institutes procedures to ensure every citizen has the right to access government documents - as well as the right to inspect and receive copies of records from state and local government bodies.
Freedom of Information Act
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
MCLA 750.520k
18. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
Felonies
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Morse v. Frederick
Civil contempt
19. The burden of proof imposed on public officials extends to anyone involved in a matter of public concern - regardless of whether they were famous or unknown.
Clark v. ABC
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
MCLA 750.520k
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
20. If an ongoing - criminal investigation is actively underway - discretion may be used under the exemption claim in FOIA to withhold some documents.
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Clark v. ABC
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
21. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Irreparable harm
Jurisdiction
Sixth amendmen
22. Reconfirmed that you cannot censor news media and its coverage unless theirs a clear and present danger.
WXYZ v. Hand
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Libel Perquod
Rouch 2
23. Plaintiffs are not entitled to an order unmasking an anonymous author when the statements in question cannot support a cause of action for defamation.
Arraignment
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
6th - cincinnati OH
District Court
24. (privacy) There are areas around you that are a 'zone of privacy'
Preliminary hearing
Wilson v. Layne
Jurisdiction
Intrusion on physical solitude
25. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Felonies
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
New York Times v. Sullivan
26. Newspaper must have known material falsity - material falsity became standard of proof in Michigan.
Intrusion on physical solitude
Rouch 2
Private figure
Actual malice
27. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
U.S. v. Dickinson
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
District Court
28. Reading of the charges against a person
Arraignment
5 Areas of privacy
Pearson v. Dodd
Time Inc. v. Pape
29. The power of authority of a particular court to hear and adjudicate matters in dispute
Actual Damages
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Evening News Association v. Troy
Jurisdiction
30. This protects the media from liability of defamatory statements made during official proceedings. The published story must be a fair and accurate account of what happened.
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Fourth amendment
Private figure
Qualified privilege
31. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
Pretiral hearing
Fourth amendment
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
32. Private members of society are not required by the First Amendment to meet the 'actual malice' standard in order to recover damage.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
33. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Branzburg v. Hayes
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
New York Times v. Sullivan
Galella v. Onassis
34. To claim exemption for investigative records - they must show how disclosure would interfere with proceedings. The burden of proof is on the party claiming exemption.
Gannett v. DePasquale
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Evening News Association v. Troy
False light
35. There is a first amendment right of access to the public to cover and attend trials.
Sixth amendmen
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
5 Areas of privacy
Florida Star v. B.J.F
36. NYT actual malice rule is extended form just public officials to include public figures
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Public figure
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
37. If the information is lawfully obtained - the defendant can't be held in contempt of court.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
False light
Florida Star v. B.J.F
In re Times Publishing Co.
38. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Right to publicity
Dendrite v. John Does
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
39. Criminal matters anything less than a year in jail
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Misdemeanor
Clark v. ABC
40. Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency - 2. Intrusion on physical solitude - 3. False light - 4. Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit - 5. Right to publicity
5 Areas of privacy
Private figure
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Florida Star v. B.J.F
41. Broadcasters are immune from liability if political candidates defame someone while under section 315
Actual Damages
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Fair comment
42. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Galella v. Onassis
Pretiral hearing
Time Inc. v. Hill
43. The Sixth Amendment rights of a defendant outweigh the First Amendment of the press in cases where the press can have prejudicial outcome of the defendant's trial.
Gannett v. DePasquale
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
44. A constructive trust is a proper manner of relinquishing the profits of one who abuses a confidential position.
False light
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Snepp v. United States
45. A proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Fair comment
46. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
District Court
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Private figure
5 Elements of libel
47. There is a First amendment right of access to trials
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
48. Michigan is in ____ district court in ____ -____
Tickets
Any civil matter
Arraignment
6th - cincinnati OH
49. Only in Massachusetts - you can close a preliminary hearing if the case is a sexual assault case.
WXYZ v. Hand
New York Times v. United States
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
50. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Herbert v. Lando
Precedent
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency