SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. In the case where a party challenges the underlying facts that support a trial court's decision - the appellate court must defer to the trial court's view of the facts.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Time Inc. v. Hill
2. What is shot in public place is fine - but if there is intrusion on physical solitude it is not protected.
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Florida Star v. B.J.F
3. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
Summary judgment
False light
Morse v. Frederick
Felonies
4. A constructive trust is a proper manner of relinquishing the profits of one who abuses a confidential position.
Snepp v. United States
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Time Inc. v. Pape
5. The government cannot censor. In order to exercise prior restraint - the Government must show sufficient evidence that the publication would cause a 'grave and irreparable' danger.
New York Times v. United States
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Doctrine of neutral reportage
6. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating an educational purpose.
Tasini v. NYT
Gertz v. Welch
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
7. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
Herbert v. Lando
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Right to publicity
Dendrite v. John Does
8. The First Amendment protects college students' freedom of expression - and the Hazelwood case should not be applied to college media.
Dendrite v. John Does
Intrusion on physical solitude
Kincaid v. Gibson
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
9. There is liability even if the news organization reports both sides - if the sources are not credible.
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
10. (privacy) Ex. Beyonce has a thing of Ocean Spray orange juice. Ocean Spray uses the photo as a marketing campaign. Beyonce could go after them.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
11. Institutes procedures to ensure every citizen has the right to access government documents - as well as the right to inspect and receive copies of records from state and local government bodies.
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
WXYZ v. Hand
Freedom of Information Act
Pearson v. Dodd
12. When you have a private figure plaintiff - even though state standards controls - if it's a matter of public concern - the burden of proof shifts from the defendant who no longer has to prove truth - to the plaintiff who has to prove falsity of what
Alander
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
13. The burden of proof imposed on public officials extends to anyone involved in a matter of public concern - regardless of whether they were famous or unknown.
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Freedom of information act
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
14. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Shepherd v. Maxwell
False light
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Private figure
15. Requires certain information held by various federal and state agencies to be made available to the public unless the information falls under one of the exemptions.
Freedom of information act
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Intrusion on physical solitude
Libel
16. If a publication accurately prints something from a false public record document - they cannot be sued for libel.
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Fourteenth amendment
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
17. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Certiorari
First amendment
Branzburg v. Hayes
False light
18. NYT actual malice standard does not extend to private figures. However - it's up to the states to determine what a private figure is - and there's a new standard that says you have to prove harm and damages.
Amicus curiae
Morse v. Frederick
Gertz v. Welch
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
19. If the information is lawfully obtained - the defendant can't be held in contempt of court.
Intrusion on physical solitude
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Pretiral hearing
In re Times Publishing Co.
20. Enforced freelancer/copyright actions - and publishers who were doing more than compile the stories had to pay the reporters. Electronic publications (putting it online) makes it a new publication.
Pearson v. Dodd
Fair comment
Tasini v. NYT
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
21. Incidental use of someone's image cold be an invasion of privacy or defamation.
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Irreparable harm
Tasini v. NYT
Clark v. ABC
22. (privacy) a. Because of who you are - you have a right to profit from your image b. Endorsements
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Snepp v. United States
Libel Perquod
Right to publicity
23. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
Fourteenth amendment
District Court
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
5 Elements of libel
24. An order issued by the court to prevent attorneys and witnesses from discussing the case outside the courtroom - or reporters from publishing information obtained during a court proceeding.
Public figure
Rouch 1
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Gag order
25. Private members of society are not required by the First Amendment to meet the 'actual malice' standard in order to recover damage.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
26. Newspapers do not have an equal time requirement like broadcast has.
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Circuit Court
Wilson v. Layne
27. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Clark v. ABC
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
28. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
Wilson v. Layne
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
U.S. v. Dickinson
Gag order
29. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
Defenses of libel
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Freedom of Information Act
WXYZ v. Hand
30. The OMA does not allow public bodies to bypass the law by closing meetings or doing round robin phone calls. universities are not exempt from FOIA in cases of public records.
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
31. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Pearson v. Dodd
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
New York Times v. United States
32. In Michigan - booking photos are available to the public.
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Injunction
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Tickets
33. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Alander
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
34. For presidential searches - MI supreme court ruled universities are 4th arm of government - and must conduct search in public.
Gertz v. Welch
5 Elements of libel
Qualified privilege
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
35. Have to have an open meeting when interviewing candidates for a public position.
New York Times v. United States
District Court
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
36. Harm done which the law cannot remedy.
New York Times v. Sullivan
Irreparable harm
MCLA 750.520k
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
37. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Sixth amendmen
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
38. Words that may be innocent on face - but facts make story damaging
Branzburg v. Hayes
Libel Perquod
Evening News Association v. Troy
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
39. Even though university foundations are privately incorporated - they might be subject to comply with FOIA and OMA if the majority of funding comes from the university.
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Herbert v. Lando
40. 3rd party has no obligation to notify media when there's been a government subpoena of phone records. Also includes any form of electronic communication.
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Pearson v. Dodd
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
41. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
Certiorari
Libel Per Se
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Precedent
42. Damages presumed - Falsely accusing someone of a crime - Statements concerning race or political belief - Damaging someone in their business - Ex. calling brain surgeon 'butterfingers'
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Libel Per Se
Civil contempt
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
43. A court created device to weed out inadmissible evidence in advance of trial
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Evening News Association v. Troy
Pretiral hearing
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
44. Innocent and negligent misstatement in a newspaper are protected under constitutional freedoms of speech and press.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Rouch 1
Intrusion on physical solitude
Time Inc. v. Hill
45. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
WXYZ v. Hand
New York Times v. United States
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
46. Journalists and citizens must first obey court orders first before seeking appeal - even if they believe the order is unconstitutional
U.S. v. Dickinson
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Time Inc. v. Pape
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
47. Friend of the court.
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Amicus curiae
48. Permission given by SCOTUS to allow a case to be appealed
Public figure
State News v. Michigan State University
Certiorari
WXYZ v. Hand
49. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
Qualified privilege
Public figure
Defenses of libel
Tickets
50. Newspaper must have known material falsity - material falsity became standard of proof in Michigan.
Rouch 2
District Court
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor