SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. In the case where a party challenges the underlying facts that support a trial court's decision - the appellate court must defer to the trial court's view of the facts.
Snepp v. United States
6th - cincinnati OH
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
5 Elements of libel
2. The press has no greater constitutional right to access penal facilities than any member of the general public
Libel
First amendment
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
3. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
False light
Jurisdiction
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
4. If you get the information from outside sources - you can publish it. MCL 750.520k does not constitute an unlawful prior restraint on publication. Rather - the statute directs that the court file be withheld from the public
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Fourteenth amendment
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
5. The power of authority of a particular court to hear and adjudicate matters in dispute
Jurisdiction
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Galella v. Onassis
Libel
6. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
Kincaid v. Gibson
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
False light
WXYZ v. Hand
7. Lowest court handles: Tickets - civil matter - Misdemeanor - Felonies
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Fourteenth amendment
Any civil matter
District Court
8. Broadcasters are immune from liability if political candidates defame someone while under section 315
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Injunction
Precedent
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
9. Under FOIA - personell records may be released - subject to 'appropriate redactions.'
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Precedent
10. In Michigan - booking photos are available to the public.
Herbert v. Lando
MCLA 750.520k
Tickets
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
11. hearing where the judge decides whether or not there is sufficient evidence to prove a crime. In michigan - takes place in district court
Preliminary hearing
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
12. Private members of society are not required by the First Amendment to meet the 'actual malice' standard in order to recover damage.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
13. Recognized first amendment right of privacy for private figures against media.
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
14. Words that may be innocent on face - but facts make story damaging
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Libel Perquod
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
15. The Sixth Amendment rights of a defendant outweigh the First Amendment of the press in cases where the press can have prejudicial outcome of the defendant's trial.
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Certiorari
First amendment
Gannett v. DePasquale
16. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Alander
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Arraignment
17. Reading of the charges against a person
Irreparable harm
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Arraignment
18. Enforced freelancer/copyright actions - and publishers who were doing more than compile the stories had to pay the reporters. Electronic publications (putting it online) makes it a new publication.
Tasini v. NYT
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Fourth amendment
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
19. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
State News v. Michigan State University
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
In re Times Publishing Co.
20. Institutes procedures to ensure every citizen has the right to access government documents - as well as the right to inspect and receive copies of records from state and local government bodies.
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Freedom of Information Act
21. Only in Massachusetts - you can close a preliminary hearing if the case is a sexual assault case.
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Preliminary hearing
First amendment
MCLA 750.520k
22. Anything punishable by more than a year in jail
Intrusion on physical solitude
Felonies
U.S. v. Dickinson
Gannett v. DePasquale
23. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Precedent
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
24. NYT actual malice standard does not extend to private figures. However - it's up to the states to determine what a private figure is - and there's a new standard that says you have to prove harm and damages.
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Misdemeanor
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Gertz v. Welch
25. Failure to obey an order made by the court
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Civil contempt
Preliminary hearing
Shepherd v. Maxwell
26. Opinion - privilege - fair comment - truth - constitutional defenses
Sixth amendmen
Fair comment
Defenses of libel
Gag order
27. Set the standard in MI that negligence is needed to prove libel - as the legislature had not acted.
Circuit Court
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Rouch 1
Clark v. ABC
28. For presidential searches - MI supreme court ruled universities are 4th arm of government - and must conduct search in public.
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
29. Guarantees freedoms of speech - religion - press and assembly.
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Certiorari
First amendment
30. There is a First amendment right of access to trials
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
31. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Sixth amendmen
Libel Per Se
Circuit Court
Doctrine of neutral reportage
32. Written defamation which causes injury to another's reputation
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Certiorari
Libel
33. The speech and debate clause only covers members of congress within the halls of congress - not outside of it. I.E. press releases - speeches - etc.
Circuit Court
Gannett v. DePasquale
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
34. The declaration of a final judgment based on the evidence presented
Adjudication
Libel
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
35. For purposes of divorce - there may be some elements of a public person's private life that make them a private figure.
U.S. v. Dickinson
WXYZ v. Hand
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Gertz v. Welch
36. A person vs. a person (corporation can be a person too
Any civil matter
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
37. If a publication accurately prints something from a false public record document - they cannot be sued for libel.
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Gag order
Private figure
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
38. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
Gannett v. DePasquale
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Evening News Association v. Troy
5 Elements of libel
39. Minor errors do not count as actual malice.
Time Inc. v. Pape
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
40. No absolute right of access to members of the media. Can be restricted within reason.
Morse v. Frederick
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Injunction
Galella v. Onassis
41. No liability for publishing information that was lawfully obtained.
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Misdemeanor
42. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Evening News Association v. Troy
False light
Pearson v. Dodd
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
43. Incidental use of someone's image cold be an invasion of privacy or defamation.
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Clark v. ABC
U.S. v. Dickinson
Galella v. Onassis
44. Have to have an open meeting when interviewing candidates for a public position.
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Galella v. Onassis
Circuit Court
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
45. A court order preventing a person or group from doing or continuing to do a specific act.
Injunction
MCLA 750.520k
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Defenses of libel
46. 3rd party has no obligation to notify media when there's been a government subpoena of phone records. Also includes any form of electronic communication.
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Morse v. Frederick
47. Money damages awarded to the injured party as compensation for a specific loss
Actual Damages
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Dendrite v. John Does
48. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Time Inc. v. Pape
Private figure
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
49. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
Preliminary hearing
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
False light
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
50. In an invasion of privacy tort - the right an individual has to profit from their likeness - or to prevent others from gaining value for their own commercial benefit
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Right to publicity
False light