SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
Private figure
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
2. Series of pre trail hearings: court created devices to weed out inadmissible evidence prior to trial. Often determine bargaining of prosecution and defendant to come up with plea bargain. Most cases are ended with plea bargain and don't go to trial.
Circuit Court
Alander
False light
New York Times v. United States
3. There is a first amendment right of access to the public to cover and attend trials.
Time Inc. v. Hill
Pretiral hearing
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
4. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Sixth amendmen
Libel Perquod
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
5. No absolute right of access to members of the media. Can be restricted within reason.
False light
Pretiral hearing
Galella v. Onassis
Summary judgment
6. The Sixth Amendment rights of a defendant outweigh the First Amendment of the press in cases where the press can have prejudicial outcome of the defendant's trial.
Rouch 2
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Gannett v. DePasquale
7. Plaintiffs are not entitled to an order unmasking an anonymous author when the statements in question cannot support a cause of action for defamation.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Kincaid v. Gibson
6th - cincinnati OH
8. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
Qualified privilege
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Private figure
Precedent
9. School officials can prohibit students from displaying messages that promote illegal drug use.
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Morse v. Frederick
In re Times Publishing Co.
MCLA 750.520k
10. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
Sixth amendmen
Freedom of Information Act
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Gertz v. Welch
11. Criminal matters anything less than a year in jail
Misdemeanor
Summary judgment
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Gag order
12. Enforced freelancer/copyright actions - and publishers who were doing more than compile the stories had to pay the reporters. Electronic publications (putting it online) makes it a new publication.
Tasini v. NYT
District Court
Fourth amendment
Shepherd v. Maxwell
13. Even though university foundations are privately incorporated - they might be subject to comply with FOIA and OMA if the majority of funding comes from the university.
Public figure
Snepp v. United States
False light
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
14. As long as speech was about a public official (figure) could not reasonably be construed to state actual facts about its subject - it is protected by the first amendment.
Any civil matter
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
15. Compensatory damages are a proper remedy to avoid the injustice under a promissory estoppel claim.
Qualified privilege
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Tasini v. NYT
16. 3rd party has no obligation to notify media when there's been a government subpoena of phone records. Also includes any form of electronic communication.
Misdemeanor
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Rouch 2
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
17. Newspaper must have known material falsity - material falsity became standard of proof in Michigan.
Freedom of Information Act
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Rouch 2
18. Federal if between two states (although try to get it back to states) - telecommunications - crossing state lines - anything violating state law
Gertz v. Welch
Dendrite v. John Does
Rouch 2
District Court
19. If a statement 'results in a material change in the meaning conveyed by the statement -' the person who says it can be sued for libel.
Gag order
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Shepherd v. Maxwell
20. Written defamation which causes injury to another's reputation
Injunction
Tickets
Libel
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
21. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Alander
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Actual malice
22. Have to have an open meeting when interviewing candidates for a public position.
Morse v. Frederick
Freedom of information act
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Time Inc. v. Hill
23. The First Amendment protects college students' freedom of expression - and the Hazelwood case should not be applied to college media.
Kincaid v. Gibson
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Libel
24. The burden of proof imposed on public officials extends to anyone involved in a matter of public concern - regardless of whether they were famous or unknown.
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Gannett v. DePasquale
25. Reading of the charges against a person
Misdemeanor
Arraignment
Precedent
Libel Perquod
26. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Fourth amendment
Libel
Tickets
27. What is shot in public place is fine - but if there is intrusion on physical solitude it is not protected.
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Rouch 2
Wilson v. Layne
28. Requires certain information held by various federal and state agencies to be made available to the public unless the information falls under one of the exemptions.
Amicus curiae
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Freedom of information act
29. NYT actual malice standard does not extend to private figures. However - it's up to the states to determine what a private figure is - and there's a new standard that says you have to prove harm and damages.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Certiorari
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Gertz v. Welch
30. The government cannot censor. In order to exercise prior restraint - the Government must show sufficient evidence that the publication would cause a 'grave and irreparable' danger.
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
New York Times v. United States
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
31. In the case where a party challenges the underlying facts that support a trial court's decision - the appellate court must defer to the trial court's view of the facts.
Defenses of libel
False light
Herbert v. Lando
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
32. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Snepp v. United States
Tickets
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
33. Upon the request of the counsel or the victim - you can order that the names of the victim and actor and details of the alleged offense be suppressed until such time as the actor is arraigned - the charge is dismissed - or the case is otherwise concl
MCLA 750.520k
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Intrusion on physical solitude
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
34. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
5 Elements of libel
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Irreparable harm
35. A published article must be so inaccurate that it will have more of an effect on the reader than the literal truth would.
Snepp v. United States
Summary judgment
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
McCracken v. Evening News Association
36. Guarantees freedoms of speech - religion - press and assembly.
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
First amendment
37. Damages presumed - Falsely accusing someone of a crime - Statements concerning race or political belief - Damaging someone in their business - Ex. calling brain surgeon 'butterfingers'
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Precedent
Libel Per Se
Private figure
38. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Kincaid v. Gibson
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
39. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
Felonies
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Actual Damages
40. In an invasion of privacy tort - an action that characterizes a person falsely. Often the person is misrepresented by quoting out of context - the careless use of photos or cutlines - or by using a picture from one story as a picture for another.
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
False light
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Gertz v. Welch
41. Permission given by SCOTUS to allow a case to be appealed
Circuit Court
District Court
Amicus curiae
Certiorari
42. Motions for summary judgment is applicable if the publication is not private facts and is newsworthy.
Preliminary hearing
Gag order
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Public figure
43. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Wilson v. Layne
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Branzburg v. Hayes
44. Police have to disclose incident report records. Do have to keep submitting FOIAs.
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
State News v. Michigan State University
Galella v. Onassis
Alander
45. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Pearson v. Dodd
Wilson v. Layne
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
46. Recognized first amendment right of privacy for private figures against media.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Defenses of libel
47. When you have a private figure plaintiff - even though state standards controls - if it's a matter of public concern - the burden of proof shifts from the defendant who no longer has to prove truth - to the plaintiff who has to prove falsity of what
Evening News Association v. Troy
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Dendrite v. John Does
48. The OMA does not allow public bodies to bypass the law by closing meetings or doing round robin phone calls. universities are not exempt from FOIA in cases of public records.
Adjudication
Pearson v. Dodd
Libel
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
49. This protects the media from liability of defamatory statements made during official proceedings. The published story must be a fair and accurate account of what happened.
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
False light
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Qualified privilege
50. For purposes of divorce - there may be some elements of a public person's private life that make them a private figure.
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Defamation
Herbert v. Lando
Felonies