SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A person vs. a person (corporation can be a person too
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Any civil matter
Irreparable harm
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
2. NYT actual malice standard does not extend to private figures. However - it's up to the states to determine what a private figure is - and there's a new standard that says you have to prove harm and damages.
False light
Time Inc. v. Hill
Precedent
Gertz v. Welch
3. Lowest court handles: Tickets - civil matter - Misdemeanor - Felonies
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Arraignment
District Court
4. Under FOIA - personell records may be released - subject to 'appropriate redactions.'
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
5. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Qualified privilege
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
False light
6. The First Amendment protects college students' freedom of expression - and the Hazelwood case should not be applied to college media.
Gertz v. Welch
Public figure
Kincaid v. Gibson
False light
7. Damages presumed - Falsely accusing someone of a crime - Statements concerning race or political belief - Damaging someone in their business - Ex. calling brain surgeon 'butterfingers'
Actual Damages
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Libel Per Se
8. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Right to publicity
Branzburg v. Hayes
9. (privacy) There are areas around you that are a 'zone of privacy'
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Intrusion on physical solitude
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
10. A judgment made by the court before or during a trial. This judgment is in repsonse to a motion by the plaintiff or defendant - who claims there is not enough evidence or there is no dispute that the information given is fact.
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Morse v. Frederick
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Summary judgment
11. There is liability even if the news organization reports both sides - if the sources are not credible.
False light
5 Elements of libel
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
12. This protects the media from liability of defamatory statements made during official proceedings. The published story must be a fair and accurate account of what happened.
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Qualified privilege
Branzburg v. Hayes
13. If a quote is altered - in order for a publication to be sued the plaintiff must prove the meaning portrayed in altered quote is dramatically different than the actual quote
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
14. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Wilson v. Layne
15. Anything punishable by more than a year in jail
Time Inc. v. Pape
In re Times Publishing Co.
Felonies
Shepherd v. Maxwell
16. If you knowingly run ads that advocate criminal activity - you can be held liable. Got off on the first case - but on the second case they should have known better.
Herbert v. Lando
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
6th - cincinnati OH
17. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
U.S. v. Dickinson
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
New York Times v. Sullivan
Herbert v. Lando
18. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Private figure
Irreparable harm
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
19. A decision of a court that is recognized as an authority in deciding cases which deal with similar or identical questions of law.
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
MCLA 750.520k
Time Inc. v. Hill
Precedent
20. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
Amicus curiae
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
WXYZ v. Hand
False light
21. The right of an individual to a speedy trial by an impartial jury - to be informed of the changes against them - to confront witnesses - the right to have compulsory proceedings to obtain witnesses in their favor - and the right to have assistance of
Circuit Court
First amendment
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Sixth amendmen
22. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Pearson v. Dodd
Defamation
Intrusion on physical solitude
Qualified privilege
23. In Michigan - there's an absolute right of public to be present during jury selection.
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
24. A proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Libel Per Se
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Libel
25. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Private figure
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Rouch 2
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
26. Guarantees people the right to be secure in their homes and property against unreasonable searches and seizures. Also protects against the issuance of a warrant without probable cause.
District Court
Fourth amendment
District Court
Intrusion on physical solitude
27. If the information is lawfully obtained - the defendant can't be held in contempt of court.
In re Times Publishing Co.
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Felonies
28. Series of pre trail hearings: court created devices to weed out inadmissible evidence prior to trial. Often determine bargaining of prosecution and defendant to come up with plea bargain. Most cases are ended with plea bargain and don't go to trial.
New York Times v. United States
Injunction
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Circuit Court
29. 3rd party has no obligation to notify media when there's been a government subpoena of phone records. Also includes any form of electronic communication.
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
30. Any communication - true or false - which exposes a person to hatred - ridicule or contempt. the person's reputation is harmed or damaged
Libel Perquod
Defamation
Sixth amendmen
New York Times v. United States
31. Newspaper must have known material falsity - material falsity became standard of proof in Michigan.
District Court
Rouch 2
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Fourteenth amendment
32. Michigan is in ____ district court in ____ -____
6th - cincinnati OH
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Shepherd v. Maxwell
33. Reading of the charges against a person
Gag order
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Wilson v. Layne
Arraignment
34. Institutes procedures to ensure every citizen has the right to access government documents - as well as the right to inspect and receive copies of records from state and local government bodies.
Actual Damages
Kincaid v. Gibson
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Freedom of Information Act
35. In the case where a party challenges the underlying facts that support a trial court's decision - the appellate court must defer to the trial court's view of the facts.
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
36. First Amendment protects even false statements about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. (actual malice)
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
New York Times v. Sullivan
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Shepherd v. Maxwell
37. Requires certain information held by various federal and state agencies to be made available to the public unless the information falls under one of the exemptions.
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Certiorari
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Freedom of information act
38. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Tickets
Circuit Court
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
39. The declaration of a final judgment based on the evidence presented
State News v. Michigan State University
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Adjudication
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
40. NYT actual malice rule is extended form just public officials to include public figures
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Injunction
Any civil matter
State News v. Michigan State University
41. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
Irreparable harm
Freedom of information act
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
42. The First Amendment protection for students does not require a public school to print speech when they can justify their decision by stating it is lewd - indecent or offensive - or have legitimate pedagogical concerns.
Freedom of Information Act
New York Times v. Sullivan
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Injunction
43. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
In re Times Publishing Co.
6th - cincinnati OH
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
44. Compensatory damages are a proper remedy to avoid the injustice under a promissory estoppel claim.
5 Areas of privacy
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Snepp v. United States
Time Inc. v. Pape
45. There is a first amendment right of access to the public to cover and attend trials.
Arraignment
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Intrusion on physical solitude
46. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
6th - cincinnati OH
5 Elements of libel
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Actual Damages
47. Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency - 2. Intrusion on physical solitude - 3. False light - 4. Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit - 5. Right to publicity
5 Areas of privacy
Galella v. Onassis
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
48. Minor errors do not count as actual malice.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Time Inc. v. Pape
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
49. Plaintiffs are not entitled to an order unmasking an anonymous author when the statements in question cannot support a cause of action for defamation.
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Snepp v. United States
Sixth amendmen
50. Have to have an open meeting when interviewing candidates for a public position.
Amicus curiae
District Court
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City