SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Spoken defamation which causes injury to a person's reputation
Alander
Rouch 2
Civil contempt
Time Inc. v. Pape
2. Any communication - true or false - which exposes a person to hatred - ridicule or contempt. the person's reputation is harmed or damaged
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Certiorari
Defamation
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
3. A constructive trust is a proper manner of relinquishing the profits of one who abuses a confidential position.
Morse v. Frederick
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Intrusion on physical solitude
Snepp v. United States
4. A proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
State News v. Michigan State University
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
5. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
6. To claim exemption for investigative records - they must show how disclosure would interfere with proceedings. The burden of proof is on the party claiming exemption.
Time Inc. v. Pape
Evening News Association v. Troy
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Libel Per Se
7. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Pearson v. Dodd
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
District Court
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
8. Prevents ISPs from liability except on copyright.
Dendrite v. John Does
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
9. The media must make sure that permission is acquired in commercial situations.
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
10. NYT actual malice standard does not extend to private figures. However - it's up to the states to determine what a private figure is - and there's a new standard that says you have to prove harm and damages.
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Gertz v. Welch
Pretiral hearing
Intrusion on physical solitude
11. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Rouch 1
Gertz v. Welch
12. Have to have an open meeting when interviewing candidates for a public position.
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
13. in an invasion of privacy tort - an action which occurs when an individual's expectation of privacy or right to be left alone is breached. EX. A reporter lies about his identity to gain access to information they couldn't under normal conditions.
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Intrusion on physical solitude
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
14. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Fourth amendment
Shepherd v. Maxwell
15. For purposes of defamation - a person who has thrust themself into the spotlight and has the power to gain media publicity. these individuals must prove actual malice to prevail in a libel suit
Kincaid v. Gibson
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Public figure
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
16. The burden of proof imposed on public officials extends to anyone involved in a matter of public concern - regardless of whether they were famous or unknown.
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Private figure
New York Times v. United States
17. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Branzburg v. Hayes
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Intrusion on physical solitude
District Court
18. Published work of copyrighted material is a violation and isn't protected under Section 107 as 'fair use.'
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Qualified privilege
Gag order
Rouch 2
19. Institutes procedures to ensure every citizen has the right to access government documents - as well as the right to inspect and receive copies of records from state and local government bodies.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Rouch 2
Freedom of Information Act
Clark v. ABC
20. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Private figure
Arraignment
False light
21. The OMA does not allow public bodies to bypass the law by closing meetings or doing round robin phone calls. universities are not exempt from FOIA in cases of public records.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Any civil matter
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
22. Compensatory damages are a proper remedy to avoid the injustice under a promissory estoppel claim.
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
New York Times v. United States
Pretiral hearing
Libel
23. (privacy) There are areas around you that are a 'zone of privacy'
Libel Perquod
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
Intrusion on physical solitude
24. Incidental use of someone's image cold be an invasion of privacy or defamation.
Clark v. ABC
Morse v. Frederick
5 Areas of privacy
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
25. Reckless disregard for the truth; knowing falsity
Gannett v. DePasquale
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Gag order
Actual malice
26. Even though university foundations are privately incorporated - they might be subject to comply with FOIA and OMA if the majority of funding comes from the university.
Irreparable harm
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
27. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Wilson v. Layne
Nebraska Press Association. v. Stuart
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
28. Police have to disclose incident report records. Do have to keep submitting FOIAs.
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
State News v. Michigan State University
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Public figure
29. A judgment made by the court before or during a trial. This judgment is in repsonse to a motion by the plaintiff or defendant - who claims there is not enough evidence or there is no dispute that the information given is fact.
Summary judgment
False light
Right to publicity
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
30. There is a first amendment right of access to the public to cover and attend trials.
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Libel Perquod
5 Areas of privacy
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
31. No liability for publishing information that was lawfully obtained.
Time Inc. v. Pape
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
MCLA 750.520k
32. There is a First amendment right of access to trials
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
33. The government cannot censor. In order to exercise prior restraint - the Government must show sufficient evidence that the publication would cause a 'grave and irreparable' danger.
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
New York Times v. United States
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
34. The press has no greater constitutional right to access penal facilities than any member of the general public
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Galella v. Onassis
Libel Per Se
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
35. Newspapers do not have an equal time requirement like broadcast has.
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
Actual malice
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Arraignment
36. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
Right to publicity
MCLA 750.520k
Kincaid v. Gibson
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
37. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
Jurisdiction
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
38. The speech and debate clause only covers members of congress within the halls of congress - not outside of it. I.E. press releases - speeches - etc.
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Time Inc. v. Pape
False light
39. No absolute right of access to members of the media. Can be restricted within reason.
Actual malice
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Dendrite v. John Does
Galella v. Onassis
40. 3rd party has no obligation to notify media when there's been a government subpoena of phone records. Also includes any form of electronic communication.
Private figure
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
District Court
District Court
41. Michigan is in ____ district court in ____ -____
New York Times v. United States
Any civil matter
Time Inc. v. Firestone
6th - cincinnati OH
42. A person vs. a person (corporation can be a person too
Actual malice
Any civil matter
Clark v. ABC
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
43. Money damages awarded to the injured party as compensation for a specific loss
In re Times Publishing Co.
Freedom of information act
Actual Damages
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
44. What is shot in public place is fine - but if there is intrusion on physical solitude it is not protected.
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Arraignment
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
False light
45. Words that may be innocent on face - but facts make story damaging
New York Times v. United States
Libel Perquod
State News v. Michigan State University
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
46. Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency - 2. Intrusion on physical solitude - 3. False light - 4. Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit - 5. Right to publicity
5 Areas of privacy
State News v. Michigan State University
Rouch 2
6th - cincinnati OH
47. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
Herbert v. Lando
Actual malice
Right to publicity
Civil contempt
48. For purposes of divorce - there may be some elements of a public person's private life that make them a private figure.
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Time Inc. v. Firestone
Snepp v. United States
Rouch 2
49. The power of authority of a particular court to hear and adjudicate matters in dispute
Kincaid v. Gibson
Jurisdiction
Herbert v. Lando
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
50. If a statement 'results in a material change in the meaning conveyed by the statement -' the person who says it can be sued for libel.
Certiorari
MCLA 750.520k
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine