SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Minor errors do not count as actual malice.
5 Elements of libel
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Intrusion on physical solitude
Time Inc. v. Pape
2. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Actual malice
Actual Damages
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
Private figure
3. 3rd party has no obligation to notify media when there's been a government subpoena of phone records. Also includes any form of electronic communication.
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
U.S. v. Dickinson
4. In an invasion of privacy tort - the right an individual has to profit from their likeness - or to prevent others from gaining value for their own commercial benefit
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Right to publicity
5. What is shot in public place is fine - but if there is intrusion on physical solitude it is not protected.
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
Libel
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
6. The press has no greater constitutional right to access penal facilities than any member of the general public
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Defamation
Galella v. Onassis
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
7. in an invasion of privacy tort - an action which occurs when an individual's expectation of privacy or right to be left alone is breached. EX. A reporter lies about his identity to gain access to information they couldn't under normal conditions.
False light
Doctrine of neutral reportage
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Intrusion on physical solitude
8. If the information is lawfully obtained - the defendant can't be held in contempt of court.
Actual malice
Rouch 2
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
In re Times Publishing Co.
9. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
New York Times v. United States
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Fourth amendment
10. Even though university foundations are privately incorporated - they might be subject to comply with FOIA and OMA if the majority of funding comes from the university.
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
Time Inc. v. Hill
District Court
5 Elements of libel
11. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
Herbert v. Lando
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
Public figure
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
12. Damages presumed - Falsely accusing someone of a crime - Statements concerning race or political belief - Damaging someone in their business - Ex. calling brain surgeon 'butterfingers'
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Libel Per Se
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
District Court
13. Incidental use of someone's image cold be an invasion of privacy or defamation.
Clark v. ABC
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Right to publicity
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
14. Series of pre trail hearings: court created devices to weed out inadmissible evidence prior to trial. Often determine bargaining of prosecution and defendant to come up with plea bargain. Most cases are ended with plea bargain and don't go to trial.
Circuit Court
Precedent
U.S. v. Dickinson
Irreparable harm
15. Reading of the charges against a person
Arraignment
Qualified privilege
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Fourteenth amendment
16. Qualified privilege allows newspapers to report on both sides of a story as long as the sources are qualified. Created doctrine of neutral reportage
Adjudication
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
6th - cincinnati OH
17. Upon the request of the counsel or the victim - you can order that the names of the victim and actor and details of the alleged offense be suppressed until such time as the actor is arraigned - the charge is dismissed - or the case is otherwise concl
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
MCLA 750.520k
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
18. (privacy) a. Because of who you are - you have a right to profit from your image b. Endorsements
Fair comment
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Right to publicity
Dendrite v. John Does
19. MI Supreme Court ruled directory information of teachers cannot be disclosed. (home address and phone number)
Clark v. ABC
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
20. The power of authority of a particular court to hear and adjudicate matters in dispute
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Jurisdiction
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
WXYZ v. Hand
21. Requires certain information held by various federal and state agencies to be made available to the public unless the information falls under one of the exemptions.
Fair comment
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Freedom of information act
Arraignment
22. A constructive trust is a proper manner of relinquishing the profits of one who abuses a confidential position.
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Snepp v. United States
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting
Fourteenth amendment
23. No absolute right of access to members of the media. Can be restricted within reason.
Galella v. Onassis
Time Inc. v. Hill
Sixth amendmen
Pearson v. Dodd
24. (Privacy)a. Very close to libel - If you're a public official/figure you have the actual malice rule - Portraying someone in a lie - Truth is a defense - Consent is a defense - Public newsworthy event is okay
False light
New York Times v. Sullivan
Preliminary hearing
U.S. v. Dickinson
25. The OMA does not allow public bodies to bypass the law by closing meetings or doing round robin phone calls. universities are not exempt from FOIA in cases of public records.
Circuit Court
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Certiorari
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
26. A form of qualified privilege which gives the media the right to publish articles as long as opinions are based on relevent facts. These aretiles include opinion - columns - editorials - book reviews - movie reviews - etc.
Freedom of Information Act
Fair comment
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
5 Areas of privacy
27. hearing where the judge decides whether or not there is sufficient evidence to prove a crime. In michigan - takes place in district court
Fair comment
Clark v. ABC
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Preliminary hearing
28. In Michigan - there's an absolute right of public to be present during jury selection.
Galella v. Onassis
District Court
Libel Perquod
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
29. No liability for publishing information that was lawfully obtained.
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Any civil matter
WXYZ v. Hand
Felonies
30. For purposes of divorce - there may be some elements of a public person's private life that make them a private figure.
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Time Inc. v. Hill
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Time Inc. v. Firestone
31. Protects all 'persons' from deprivation of life - liberty or property without due process of law.
Florida Star v. B.J.F
Gag order
Galella v. Onassis
Fourteenth amendment
32. Opinion - privilege - fair comment - truth - constitutional defenses
Defenses of libel
Fair comment
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
Rouch 2
33. If you obtain material from a third party illegally - media are still protected and can publish.
Fourth amendment
Pearson v. Dodd
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Dendrite v. John Does
34. Any communication - true or false - which exposes a person to hatred - ridicule or contempt. the person's reputation is harmed or damaged
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Rouch 2
Defamation
Adjudication
35. Set the standard in MI that negligence is needed to prove libel - as the legislature had not acted.
Right to publicity
Booth Newspapers v. City of Kalamazoo
Freedom of information act
Rouch 1
36. Innocent and negligent misstatement in a newspaper are protected under constitutional freedoms of speech and press.
District Court
Snepp v. United States
Time Inc. v. Hill
Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education
37. Criminal matters anything less than a year in jail
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Fourteenth amendment
Misdemeanor
Defenses of libel
38. In the case where a party challenges the underlying facts that support a trial court's decision - the appellate court must defer to the trial court's view of the facts.
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
39. If a publication accurately prints something from a false public record document - they cannot be sued for libel.
Felonies
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
New York Times v. Sullivan
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
40. Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency - 2. Intrusion on physical solitude - 3. False light - 4. Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit - 5. Right to publicity
Misdemeanor
Actual Damages
Florida Star v. B.J.F
5 Areas of privacy
41. NYT actual malice rule is extended form just public officials to include public figures
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Branzburg v. Hayes
Summary judgment
42. (privacy) Ex. Beyonce has a thing of Ocean Spray orange juice. Ocean Spray uses the photo as a marketing campaign. Beyonce could go after them.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
43. For presidential searches - MI supreme court ruled universities are 4th arm of government - and must conduct search in public.
Qualified privilege
Kincaid v. Gibson
Libel Per Se
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
44. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Actual malice
New York Times v. Sullivan
Libel Perquod
45. Judge has an absolute duty to ensure fair trial rights. Judge must be able to control what's going on in the courtroom.
Misdemeanor
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Sipple v. Chronicle Publishing Company
In re Times Publishing Co.
46. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
State News v. Michigan State University
Richmond Newspapers - Inc. v. Virginia
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
5 Elements of libel
47. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
WXYZ v. Hand
Gertz v. Welch
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Time Inc. v. Firestone
48. No guarantee of immunity for media ride alongs.
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Wilson v. Layne
In re Times Publishing Co.
49. The right to exploit one's name and likeness is personal to the artist and must be exercised - if at all - by him during his lifetime.' This resulted in a loss of inheriting personality rights in California.
R.O. v. Ithaca City School District
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Certiorari
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
50. An order issued by the court to prevent attorneys and witnesses from discussing the case outside the courtroom - or reporters from publishing information obtained during a court proceeding.
Gag order
Intrusion on physical solitude
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Snepp v. United States