SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Journalism Law
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
journalism-and-media
Instructions:
Answer 50 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Private members of society are not required by the First Amendment to meet the 'actual malice' standard in order to recover damage.
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
2. If the information is lawfully obtained - the defendant can't be held in contempt of court.
In re Times Publishing Co.
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Sixth amendmen
U.S. v. Dickinson
3. Publication - identification - defamation - harm and damages
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Libel
5 Elements of libel
4. Have to have an open meeting when interviewing candidates for a public position.
Adjudication
WXYZ v. Hand
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
5. A form of qualified privilege which gives the media the right to publish articles as long as opinions are based on relevent facts. These aretiles include opinion - columns - editorials - book reviews - movie reviews - etc.
Fair comment
Intrusion on physical solitude
Appropriation of another's likeness for commercial profit
Dendrite v. John Does
6. Friend of the court.
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Amicus curiae
5 Areas of privacy
7. To claim exemption for investigative records - they must show how disclosure would interfere with proceedings. The burden of proof is on the party claiming exemption.
Precedent
Evening News Association v. Troy
Fair comment
Time Inc. v. Firestone
8. Compensatory damages are a proper remedy to avoid the injustice under a promissory estoppel claim.
Tasini v. NYT
Fourteenth amendment
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co
9. Anything punishable by more than a year in jail
Felonies
WXYZ v. Hand
Amicus curiae
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
10. Words that may be innocent on face - but facts make story damaging
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
Private figure
Fourth amendment
Libel Perquod
11. Under the language of the statute - these media representatives are not subject to an investigative subpoena.
Right to publicity
First amendment
People of the State of Michigan v. Pastor
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
12. Any communication - true or false - which exposes a person to hatred - ridicule or contempt. the person's reputation is harmed or damaged
Defamation
MCLA 750.520k
Alander
New York Times v. Sullivan
13. Published work of copyrighted material is a violation and isn't protected under Section 107 as 'fair use.'
First amendment
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
Pearson v. Dodd
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
14. Damages presumed - Falsely accusing someone of a crime - Statements concerning race or political belief - Damaging someone in their business - Ex. calling brain surgeon 'butterfingers'
Libel Per Se
Intrusion on physical solitude
Gannett v. DePasquale
New York Times v. Sullivan
15. Civil cases when the amount in dispute is less than $25 -000
Tickets
Defenses of libel
Civil contempt
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
16. Michigan court trials have to remain open. Parts can be closed - but never all of the trial. M.C.L.A 750.520k only applies to pre-trial hearings.
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
Detroit Free Press v. Macomb Circuit Judge
17. In Michigan - there's an absolute right of public to be present during jury selection.
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
Shepherd v. Maxwell
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Defenses of libel
18. An invasion of privacy tort which occurs when information about a person's private life is published - and there is not relevant newsworthy tie.
District Court
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
Defenses of libel
19. The OMA does not allow public bodies to bypass the law by closing meetings or doing round robin phone calls. universities are not exempt from FOIA in cases of public records.
Booth Newspaper v. U of M Board of Regents
Defenses of libel
Wolston v. Readers' Digest Association
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
20. Newspaper must have known material falsity - material falsity became standard of proof in Michigan.
Defenses of libel
Felonies
Rouch 2
Defamation
21. Journalists and citizens must first obey court orders first before seeking appeal - even if they believe the order is unconstitutional
U.S. v. Dickinson
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
Certiorari
Snepp v. United States
22. Reading of the charges against a person
Shepherd v. Maxwell
Misdemeanor
Arraignment
A.Z. v. Jane Doe
23. Requires certain information held by various federal and state agencies to be made available to the public unless the information falls under one of the exemptions.
Irreparable harm
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Freedom of information act
In re Times Publishing Co.
24. Statements of opinion that could be perceived as defamation need to be based on reliable evidence.
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
McCracken v. Evening News Association
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
25. Undercover efforts by news organizations could be prosecuted not for defamation - but possibly for things like breach of duty or loyalty.
Galella v. Onassis
Certiorari
False light
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
26. If a publication accurately prints something from a false public record document - they cannot be sued for libel.
Defamation
McIntosh v. The Detroit News
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
First amendment
27. Reporters have no greater rights than any other citizen - there is no reporter shield from grand jury testifying. If you're attempting to harass - then reporters are protected and do not have to testify.
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
New York Times v. United States
Branzburg v. Hayes
Midland Publishing Co v. District Judge
28. An order issued by the court to prevent attorneys and witnesses from discussing the case outside the courtroom - or reporters from publishing information obtained during a court proceeding.
False light
Gag order
Shulman v. Group W. Productions
Masson v. New Yorker Magazine
29. This protects the media from liability of defamatory statements made during official proceedings. The published story must be a fair and accurate account of what happened.
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
New York Times v. United States
Houchins v. KQED Inc.
Qualified privilege
30. US Supreme court allows inquiry into a reporters state of mind when making decisions about what to include and what not to include.
Herbert v. Lando
Globe Newspapers v. Superior Court
Clark v. ABC
Reporters Committee v. AT&T
31. Broadcasters are immune from liability if political candidates defame someone while under section 315
Miami Herald Co. v. Tornillo
Libel Perquod
Farmers Education Cooperative v. WDAY
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
32. A reporter has a qualified privilege to report on controversial matters of public interest using reputable sources.
6th - cincinnati OH
Civil contempt
Morse v. Frederick
Doctrine of neutral reportage
33. Guarantees people the right to be secure in their homes and property against unreasonable searches and seizures. Also protects against the issuance of a warrant without probable cause.
Fourth amendment
Publication of private matters that violate ordinary decency
MCLA 750.520k
Summary judgment
34. No absolute right of access to members of the media. Can be restricted within reason.
False light
Galella v. Onassis
Right to publicity
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co
35. The speech and debate clause only covers members of congress within the halls of congress - not outside of it. I.E. press releases - speeches - etc.
Edwards v. National Audubon Society
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Private figure
Detroit Free Press v. Recorder's Court Judge
36. NYT actual malice standard does not extend to private figures. However - it's up to the states to determine what a private figure is - and there's a new standard that says you have to prove harm and damages.
Actual malice
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
MCLA 750.520k
Gertz v. Welch
37. NYT actual malice rule is extended form just public officials to include public figures
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Civil contempt
Injunction
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
38. Upon the request of the counsel or the victim - you can order that the names of the victim and actor and details of the alleged offense be suppressed until such time as the actor is arraigned - the charge is dismissed - or the case is otherwise concl
Harte-Hanks Communications - Inc. v. Connaughton
False light
MCLA 750.520k
Fourth amendment
39. Even though university foundations are privately incorporated - they might be subject to comply with FOIA and OMA if the majority of funding comes from the university.
New York Times v. Sullivan
Eimann/Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing
Eric Jackson v. Eastern Michigan University Foundation
40. In the case where a party challenges the underlying facts that support a trial court's decision - the appellate court must defer to the trial court's view of the facts.
Herbert v. Lando
Precedent
Fair comment
Booth & Ann Arbor News v. EMU Board of Regents
41. Michigan statute M.C.L.A. 750.520k violated the First - Fifth - and Fourteenth Amendments
Sixth amendmen
Misdemeanor
WXYZ v. Hand
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
42. Limited decision. Closure of preliminary hearing is unconstitutional in California because they act as mini trials to ensure defendants right to a fair trial. Unique to that state however.
Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court in Riverside
Gertz v. Welch
Circuit Court
Right to publicity
43. For the purpose of defamation - a person who does not have regular - continuing access to the media - or on matters of public controversy. These individuals have a lesser burden of proof under most state libel laws.
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Precedent
Private figure
State News v. Michigan State University
44. For presidential searches - MI supreme court ruled universities are 4th arm of government - and must conduct search in public.
Rouch 2
Intrusion on physical solitude
Federated Publications v. MSU Board of Trustees
Food Lion - Inc - v. Capital Cities/ABC
45. in an invasion of privacy tort - an action which occurs when an individual's expectation of privacy or right to be left alone is breached. EX. A reporter lies about his identity to gain access to information they couldn't under normal conditions.
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)
Civil contempt
Precedent
Intrusion on physical solitude
46. A published article must be so inaccurate that it will have more of an effect on the reader than the literal truth would.
Jurisdiction
Collins v. Detroit Free Press
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
McCracken v. Evening News Association
47. In an invasion of privacy tort - the right an individual has to profit from their likeness - or to prevent others from gaining value for their own commercial benefit
Evening News Association v. Troy
Branzburg v. Hayes
Bay City Times v. City of Bay City
Right to publicity
48. In Michigan - booking photos are available to the public.
Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Certiorari
Actual Damages
Detroit Free Press - Inc. v. Oakland County Sheriff
49. Lowest court handles: Tickets - civil matter - Misdemeanor - Felonies
District Court
Curtis Publishing v. Butts and AP v. Walker
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
Michigan Federation of Teachers v. University of Michigan
50. In an invasion of privacy tort - an action that characterizes a person falsely. Often the person is misrepresented by quoting out of context - the careless use of photos or cutlines - or by using a picture from one story as a picture for another.
Tasini v. NYT
Circuit Court
False light
In re Closure of Voir Dire (People v. Lawrence)