Test your basic knowledge |

MCAT Verbal Reasoning Questions

Instructions:
  • Answer 28 questions in 15 minutes.
  • If you are not ready to take this test, you can study here.
  • Match each statement with the correct term.
  • Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.

This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Retrieval Attractors


2. Summarize claims and implications made throughout the passage. Claim supported by specific evidence - Good active reading is key- focus on Verb in answer choice - 1. The main idea 2. the central thesis 3. The author's primary purpose






3. 1. Understate or overstate author's point 2. choice that is too narrow 3. Choices that go beyond the scope of the passage






4. Describe how the author makes their argument; address logical structure along with content - Ask purpose of particular reference: 1. The author probably mentions (blank) in order to 2. The (blank) are cited as evidence that 3. The author describes (b






5. Chose what must be true according to the passage 1. It can be inferred that 2. Based on the passage - it 3. The author implies that 4. Implicit in the passage is 5. The author suggests that 6. It can be reasonably concluded 7. Which of the following






6. Identify logical structure while asking whether a particular claim is supported in the passage 1. Which of the following claims is supported 2. For which of the following claims is not supported 3. Support offered by conclusion 4. Is (blank) well sup






7. Evaluate What effects new information will have on author's argument as a whole






8. 1. Retrieval 2. Inference 3. Vocab in context






9. Asked to evaluate answer choices in terms of how they undermine the passage - 1. Which of the following If True - would strength (or weaken) - Do Not reference passage - but take each choice as if it were true and find the one that does what it needs






10. Evaluate whether or not the author expresses an opinion regarding the material of the passage - Look for annotated opinion indicators 1. The author's tone 2. author's attitude






11. 1. choice that goes furthest toward making it impossible for claim to be true 2. Inconsistent with relevant part of passage






12. New Information Attractors






13. 1. Info of passage in extreme language/absolute 2.choices that aren't necessarily true 3. right answer wrong question






14. 1. Main Idea/Primary Purpose 2. Tone/Attitude






15. Use Goldilock's approach: eliminate What is too big or too small






16. 1. Choice that provides additional evidence for the claim 2. Choice that fills in logical gap 3. Choice that anticipates and blocks a potential argument against claim






17. 1. Structure Questions 2. Evaluate Questions 3. Strengthen/Weaken 4. New Information 5. Analogy






18. Define What the author means by a certain word or phrase 1. As its used in the passage 2. The term implicitly refers to






19. Correct answer choice is similar to claim in logic - but does nothing to strength or weaken the claim 1. Wrong tone 2. Do Not eliminate based on topic






20. 1. Give legitimate dictionary of colloquial/common sense definitions 2. Choices that over generalize or are too narrow






21. Test ability to locate info 1. According to the passage 2. The passages that 3. Which of the following is not mentioned:






22. Give new facts that are in same general area of passage and ask What is likely true according the passage - Answer question in paraphrase prior to looking at answer choices*






23. 1. Choice that take author's opinion to extremes 2. Express opinion for neutral tone 3. Strange attitudes (Ex: obtuse ambiguity)






24. Take something in passage and apply it to a new situation. New information is provided in the answer choices






25. 1. right example - wrong reference 2. Half right - half wrong choices - Correct answer will be consistent with the Main Point of the whole chunk






26. Answers that mischaracterize the strength of argument (weakly for strongly supported) - Analyze What is precisely good or bad about logic used






27. Provide new facts in the question stem that are never mentioned in the passage - 2 types: 1. Inference 2. Strengthen/Weaken






28. 1. Choices the irrelevant to cited part (out of scope) 2. Do Not eliminate solely based on strong wording (the more it strengthens/weakens - the better)