SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Performance Appraisal
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
business-skills
Instructions:
Answer 40 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. An appraisal technique that attempts to eliminate the severity - leniency and/or central tendency errors on the part of the rater by requiring the rater to place the ratees on a normal curve where a specified small percentage are rated as 'excellent
Forced distribution
Results-oriented rating method
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
Performance Appraisal
2. An interview in which the supervisor and subordinate review the appraisal and make plans to remedy deficiencies and reinforce strengths.
Performance Management Definition
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Appraisal Interview
Graphic Rating Scale
3. Rank order - Paired comparisons - Forced distribution
Graphic Rating Scale
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
Halo Effect
Critical Incident Method
4. Evaluating an employee's current and/or past performance relative to his or her performance standards.
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
Unclear Standards
Performance Appraisal
Traits-oriented rating method
5. a.) Preparation: self-appraisal received by supervisor and supervisor reviews relevant documentation b.) Interview: Superviser and supervisee share their views re supervisee's performance. Current-to-expected performance gaps identified and T&D needs
Bias
Unclear Standards
Performance appraisal interview process
Purposes of PA Systems
6. In performance appraisal - the problem that occurs when a supervisor's rating of a subordinate on one trait biases the rating of that person on other traits.
Halo Effect
Results-oriented rating method
Career Management
Unclear Standards
7. The continuous process of identifying - measuring - and developing the performance of individuals and teams and aligning their performance with the organization's goals.
Purposes of PA Systems
Bias
Strictness/Leniency
Performance Management
8. A system of ensuring the expected performance from employees through a process of - Clarifying expectations - Setting goals - Evaluating individual performance - Giving feedback and rewards
Performance Management Definition
Low reliability across raters
Performance Appraisal
Graphic Rating Scale
9. Job related and based on JA - Properly administered (formal - standardized and straightforward)- Properly documented (PA ratings - interviews & goals) - Specific feedback (goal setting - T and D - Milestones) - Focus on behaviours rather than tra
Effective PA systems
Performance Management Definition
Traditional View of Career Management
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
10. Having supervisors electronically monitor the amount of computerized data an employee is processing per day - and thereby his or her performance.
Performance Management
Performance Management Definition
Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM)
Halo Effect
11. Similar to grading on a curve; predetermined percentages of ratees are placed in various performance categories.
Forced Distribution Method
Forced distribution
Effective PA systems
Alternation Ranking Method
12. Traits-oriented rating method - Behaviour-oriented rating method - Results-oriented rating method
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
Bias
Three groups of appraisal methods
Paired Comparison Method
13. Results-oriented appraisal system which sets specific goals and key result areas (KRA's) for each employee based on the overall goals of the organisation - and evaluates the employee's performance against such KRA's so that the evaluation is based o
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Forced distribution
Performance Management
Paired comparisons
14. Ranking employees by making a chart of all possible pairs of the employees for each trait and indicating which is the better employee of the pair.
Forced Distribution Method
Paired Comparison Method
Traditional View of Career Management
Unclear Standards
15. Personal biases/standards - Observation context - Observation timing - Cognitive processing (e.g emotions)
Career Management
Halo Effect
Performance appraisal interview process
Low reliability across raters
16. The assessment of employees on the extent to which the expected results have been achieved. Leads to short-term employee perspectives.
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Critical Incident Method
Results-oriented rating method
Paired Comparison Method
17. The process by which employees acheive their career goals with assistance from the organisation through various activities to clarify one's strengths - weaknesses - interests - competencies and values. The desired outcome of training and performan
Career Management
Strictness/Leniency
Appraisal Interview
Unclear Standards
18. A scale that lists a number of traits and a range of performance for each. The employee is then rated by identifying the score that best describes his or level of performance for each trait.
Central Tendency
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
Graphic Rating Scale
Behaviour-oriented rating method
19. Keeping a record of uncommonly good or undesirable examples of an employee's work-related behaviour and reviewing it with the employee at predetermined times.
Critical Incident Method
Forced Distribution Method
Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS)
Halo Effect
20. 1.) Examples of effective and ineffective behaviour related to the job are collected by SME's 2.) These data are then converted into performance dimensions by: - grouping behaviours into groups of 'like' - defining that group of behaviours 3.) SME's
Developing BARS
Critical Incident Method
Forced Distribution Method
Paired comparisons
21. EXLPORATION: >30 years who seeks to identify one's interests and skills and the job that fits with them ESTABLISHMENT: 30-45 years seeking growth and development MAINTENANCE: 45-60 years seeking to hold onto accomplishments and update skills DISENGAG
Halo Effect
Bias
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Life-cycle model of career highlights
22. The problem that occurs when a supervisor tends to rate all subordinates either high or low.
Central Tendency
Purpose of Career management
Types of behaviour appraisals
Strictness/Leniency
23. Progress was by vertical - upward movements in the same company for the high-performing employees.
Traditional View of Career Management
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Purposes of PA Systems
Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS)
24. Be aware of their interests - skills and values - Build on their strengths and weaknesses - Identify career goals and job opportunities
Unclear Standards
Bias
Purpose of Career management
Central Tendency
25. Provide feedback on various performance criteria (poorly conducted it might lead to low morale and perceived equity) - Providing legal and formal justification for organisations to make employment decisions - Identifying developmetal needs of employe
Purposes of PA Systems
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Paired Comparison Method
26. A tendency to rate all employees the same way - such as rating them all average.
Unclear Standards
Central Tendency
Performance Evaluation Error-Based Approach
Halo Effect
27. Behaviour checklist - Graphic rating scales - Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS) - Critical incidents method - Ranking of employees - Paired comparisons - Forced distribution
Bias
Performance Evaluation Error-Based Approach
Protean Career Management
Types of behaviour appraisals
28. Who conducts performance appraisals?
Paired Comparison Method
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
Performance Appraisal
Effective PA systems
29. Proximity errors - Contrast effects
Performance Management
Halo Effect
Forced distribution
Response biases in performance appraisal
30. Common sources of error in performance evaluation - Response biases - Low reliability across raters
Performance Evaluation Error-Based Approach
Traditional View of Career Management
Unclear Standards
Paired Comparison Method
31. The listing and analysis of incidents relating to ineffective job-performance with a view to assessing the worth of a job and/or the performance of an employee. It is emplyed in job-analysis as well as PA.
Career Management
Halo Effect
Critical incidents method
Response biases in performance appraisal
32. The assessment of employees on a set of behaviours identified as being related to job-performance. Leads to long-term employee perspectives. Many methods.
Halo Effect
Behaviour-oriented rating method
Paired Comparison Method
Appraisal Interview
33. Ranking employees from best to worst on a particular trait - choosing highest - then lowest - until all are ranked.
Response biases in performance appraisal
Types of behaviour appraisals
Alternation Ranking Method
Common sources of error in performance appraisal
34. The assessment of employees on a few personality traits identified as being related to job performance. Least popular due to inconsistent correlations (except moderate one for conscientiousness)
Traits-oriented rating method
Career Management
Effective PA systems
Forced distribution
35. The tendency to allow individual differences such as age - race and sex to affect the appraisal ratings employees receive.
Paired comparisons
Types of behaviour appraisals
Developing BARS
Bias
36. Graphic scales with different points on the scale which are behaviourally defined based on a prior analysis of critical incidents of the job.
Common sources of error in performance appraisal
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS)
Purposes of PA Systems
37. Halo and Horn effects - Leniency and severity - Central tendency
Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS)
Halo Effect
Response biases in performance appraisal
Common sources of error in performance appraisal
38. An appraisal that is too open to interpretation.
Low reliability across raters
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Unclear Standards
Three groups of appraisal methods
39. The management of one's career with reference to one's life-goals rather than work goals - where the primary responsibility for managing career is with the individual not the organisation.
Paired Comparison Method
Traits-oriented rating method
Purposes of PA Systems
Protean Career Management
40. An appraisal technique where a superior is required to compare each employee with every other employee in pairs and compute each one's overall rank based on the aggregating the ranks received in pairs.
Performance Management
Forced Distribution Method
Bias
Paired comparisons