SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Performance Appraisal
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
business-skills
Instructions:
Answer 40 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Similar to grading on a curve; predetermined percentages of ratees are placed in various performance categories.
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Performance Appraisal
Forced Distribution Method
Critical Incident Method
2. Having supervisors electronically monitor the amount of computerized data an employee is processing per day - and thereby his or her performance.
Common sources of error in performance appraisal
Effective PA systems
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM)
3. a.) Preparation: self-appraisal received by supervisor and supervisor reviews relevant documentation b.) Interview: Superviser and supervisee share their views re supervisee's performance. Current-to-expected performance gaps identified and T&D needs
Performance appraisal interview process
Forced Distribution Method
Purpose of Career management
Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM)
4. Traits-oriented rating method - Behaviour-oriented rating method - Results-oriented rating method
Purposes of PA Systems
Traits-oriented rating method
Three groups of appraisal methods
Career Management
5. Who conducts performance appraisals?
Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS)
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
Alternation Ranking Method
Graphic Rating Scale
6. Common sources of error in performance evaluation - Response biases - Low reliability across raters
Performance Evaluation Error-Based Approach
Response biases in performance appraisal
Paired Comparison Method
Unclear Standards
7. The listing and analysis of incidents relating to ineffective job-performance with a view to assessing the worth of a job and/or the performance of an employee. It is emplyed in job-analysis as well as PA.
Strictness/Leniency
Types of behaviour appraisals
Critical incidents method
Halo Effect
8. A scale that lists a number of traits and a range of performance for each. The employee is then rated by identifying the score that best describes his or level of performance for each trait.
Graphic Rating Scale
Performance Management
Performance Appraisal
Unclear Standards
9. Personal biases/standards - Observation context - Observation timing - Cognitive processing (e.g emotions)
Unclear Standards
Purposes of PA Systems
Low reliability across raters
Paired Comparison Method
10. Job related and based on JA - Properly administered (formal - standardized and straightforward)- Properly documented (PA ratings - interviews & goals) - Specific feedback (goal setting - T and D - Milestones) - Focus on behaviours rather than tra
Traits-oriented rating method
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
Effective PA systems
Paired Comparison Method
11. The continuous process of identifying - measuring - and developing the performance of individuals and teams and aligning their performance with the organization's goals.
Types of behaviour appraisals
Career Management
Performance Evaluation Error-Based Approach
Performance Management
12. Rank order - Paired comparisons - Forced distribution
Performance Appraisal
Traits-oriented rating method
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
Low reliability across raters
13. An appraisal that is too open to interpretation.
Alternation Ranking Method
Critical Incident Method
Forced distribution
Unclear Standards
14. An appraisal technique that attempts to eliminate the severity - leniency and/or central tendency errors on the part of the rater by requiring the rater to place the ratees on a normal curve where a specified small percentage are rated as 'excellent
Performance Evaluation Error-Based Approach
Paired Comparison Method
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
Forced distribution
15. In performance appraisal - the problem that occurs when a supervisor's rating of a subordinate on one trait biases the rating of that person on other traits.
Performance Evaluation Error-Based Approach
Effective PA systems
Halo Effect
Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM)
16. The problem that occurs when a supervisor tends to rate all subordinates either high or low.
Alternation Ranking Method
Halo Effect
Strictness/Leniency
Low reliability across raters
17. Results-oriented appraisal system which sets specific goals and key result areas (KRA's) for each employee based on the overall goals of the organisation - and evaluates the employee's performance against such KRA's so that the evaluation is based o
Performance Evaluation Error-Based Approach
Alternation Ranking Method
Critical Incident Method
Management by Objectives (MBO)
18. The management of one's career with reference to one's life-goals rather than work goals - where the primary responsibility for managing career is with the individual not the organisation.
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Central Tendency
Protean Career Management
Three groups of appraisal methods
19. EXLPORATION: >30 years who seeks to identify one's interests and skills and the job that fits with them ESTABLISHMENT: 30-45 years seeking growth and development MAINTENANCE: 45-60 years seeking to hold onto accomplishments and update skills DISENGAG
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Graphic Rating Scale
Performance Management
Response biases in performance appraisal
20. Halo and Horn effects - Leniency and severity - Central tendency
Alternation Ranking Method
Common sources of error in performance appraisal
Behaviour-oriented rating method
Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM)
21. Ranking employees by making a chart of all possible pairs of the employees for each trait and indicating which is the better employee of the pair.
Alternation Ranking Method
Paired Comparison Method
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Forced Distribution Method
22. The assessment of employees on a set of behaviours identified as being related to job-performance. Leads to long-term employee perspectives. Many methods.
Three groups of appraisal methods
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Behaviour-oriented rating method
Management by Objectives (MBO)
23. Keeping a record of uncommonly good or undesirable examples of an employee's work-related behaviour and reviewing it with the employee at predetermined times.
Traditional View of Career Management
Types of behaviour appraisals
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Critical Incident Method
24. 1.) Examples of effective and ineffective behaviour related to the job are collected by SME's 2.) These data are then converted into performance dimensions by: - grouping behaviours into groups of 'like' - defining that group of behaviours 3.) SME's
Developing BARS
Career Management
Forced Distribution Method
Forced distribution
25. A tendency to rate all employees the same way - such as rating them all average.
Critical Incident Method
Types of behaviour appraisals
Paired Comparison Method
Central Tendency
26. Graphic scales with different points on the scale which are behaviourally defined based on a prior analysis of critical incidents of the job.
Performance Appraisal
Forced distribution
Paired Comparison Method
Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS)
27. Evaluating an employee's current and/or past performance relative to his or her performance standards.
Performance Appraisal
Common sources of error in performance appraisal
Halo Effect
Traditional View of Career Management
28. An interview in which the supervisor and subordinate review the appraisal and make plans to remedy deficiencies and reinforce strengths.
Performance Evaluation Error-Based Approach
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Appraisal Interview
Performance appraisal interview process
29. An appraisal technique where a superior is required to compare each employee with every other employee in pairs and compute each one's overall rank based on the aggregating the ranks received in pairs.
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Critical incidents method
Paired comparisons
Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM)
30. The tendency to allow individual differences such as age - race and sex to affect the appraisal ratings employees receive.
Performance Evaluation Error-Based Approach
Types of behaviour appraisals
Bias
Effective PA systems
31. Ranking employees from best to worst on a particular trait - choosing highest - then lowest - until all are ranked.
Alternation Ranking Method
Common sources of error in performance appraisal
Behaviour-oriented rating method
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
32. Progress was by vertical - upward movements in the same company for the high-performing employees.
Results-oriented rating method
Career Management
Three groups of appraisal methods
Traditional View of Career Management
33. A system of ensuring the expected performance from employees through a process of - Clarifying expectations - Setting goals - Evaluating individual performance - Giving feedback and rewards
Forced Distribution Method
Developing BARS
Types of behaviour appraisals
Performance Management Definition
34. Behaviour checklist - Graphic rating scales - Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS) - Critical incidents method - Ranking of employees - Paired comparisons - Forced distribution
Types of behaviour appraisals
Paired Comparison Method
Alternation Ranking Method
Traits-oriented rating method
35. The process by which employees acheive their career goals with assistance from the organisation through various activities to clarify one's strengths - weaknesses - interests - competencies and values. The desired outcome of training and performan
Purposes of PA Systems
Critical Incident Method
Paired Comparison Method
Career Management
36. Be aware of their interests - skills and values - Build on their strengths and weaknesses - Identify career goals and job opportunities
Purpose of Career management
Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM)
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
Forced distribution
37. Proximity errors - Contrast effects
Developing BARS
Response biases in performance appraisal
Performance appraisal interview process
Graphic Rating Scale
38. The assessment of employees on the extent to which the expected results have been achieved. Leads to short-term employee perspectives.
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
Results-oriented rating method
Halo Effect
Traits-oriented rating method
39. Provide feedback on various performance criteria (poorly conducted it might lead to low morale and perceived equity) - Providing legal and formal justification for organisations to make employment decisions - Identifying developmetal needs of employe
Purposes of PA Systems
Graphic Rating Scale
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
Three groups of appraisal methods
40. The assessment of employees on a few personality traits identified as being related to job performance. Least popular due to inconsistent correlations (except moderate one for conscientiousness)
Traits-oriented rating method
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
Critical Incident Method
Three groups of appraisal methods