SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Performance Appraisal
Start Test
Study First
Subject
:
business-skills
Instructions:
Answer 40 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Evaluating an employee's current and/or past performance relative to his or her performance standards.
Performance Management
Halo Effect
Critical Incident Method
Performance Appraisal
2. Proximity errors - Contrast effects
Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS)
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Response biases in performance appraisal
Halo Effect
3. The listing and analysis of incidents relating to ineffective job-performance with a view to assessing the worth of a job and/or the performance of an employee. It is emplyed in job-analysis as well as PA.
Halo Effect
Critical incidents method
Critical Incident Method
Purposes of PA Systems
4. A tendency to rate all employees the same way - such as rating them all average.
Paired comparisons
Central Tendency
Purposes of PA Systems
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
5. a.) Preparation: self-appraisal received by supervisor and supervisor reviews relevant documentation b.) Interview: Superviser and supervisee share their views re supervisee's performance. Current-to-expected performance gaps identified and T&D needs
Purposes of PA Systems
Low reliability across raters
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
Performance appraisal interview process
6. The process by which employees acheive their career goals with assistance from the organisation through various activities to clarify one's strengths - weaknesses - interests - competencies and values. The desired outcome of training and performan
Forced distribution
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Career Management
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
7. 1.) Examples of effective and ineffective behaviour related to the job are collected by SME's 2.) These data are then converted into performance dimensions by: - grouping behaviours into groups of 'like' - defining that group of behaviours 3.) SME's
Performance Management Definition
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Developing BARS
Bias
8. An appraisal technique that attempts to eliminate the severity - leniency and/or central tendency errors on the part of the rater by requiring the rater to place the ratees on a normal curve where a specified small percentage are rated as 'excellent
Forced Distribution Method
Appraisal Interview
Halo Effect
Forced distribution
9. A scale that lists a number of traits and a range of performance for each. The employee is then rated by identifying the score that best describes his or level of performance for each trait.
Graphic Rating Scale
Paired Comparison Method
Alternation Ranking Method
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
10. The assessment of employees on a few personality traits identified as being related to job performance. Least popular due to inconsistent correlations (except moderate one for conscientiousness)
Critical Incident Method
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
Appraisal Interview
Traits-oriented rating method
11. The continuous process of identifying - measuring - and developing the performance of individuals and teams and aligning their performance with the organization's goals.
Common sources of error in performance appraisal
Paired Comparison Method
Results-oriented rating method
Performance Management
12. Ranking employees from best to worst on a particular trait - choosing highest - then lowest - until all are ranked.
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
Three groups of appraisal methods
Traditional View of Career Management
Alternation Ranking Method
13. Be aware of their interests - skills and values - Build on their strengths and weaknesses - Identify career goals and job opportunities
Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM)
Strictness/Leniency
Low reliability across raters
Purpose of Career management
14. Provide feedback on various performance criteria (poorly conducted it might lead to low morale and perceived equity) - Providing legal and formal justification for organisations to make employment decisions - Identifying developmetal needs of employe
Alternation Ranking Method
Purposes of PA Systems
Graphic Rating Scale
Response biases in performance appraisal
15. Graphic scales with different points on the scale which are behaviourally defined based on a prior analysis of critical incidents of the job.
Appraisal Interview
Purposes of PA Systems
Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS)
Traits-oriented rating method
16. An interview in which the supervisor and subordinate review the appraisal and make plans to remedy deficiencies and reinforce strengths.
Results-oriented rating method
Purposes of PA Systems
Appraisal Interview
Management by Objectives (MBO)
17. In performance appraisal - the problem that occurs when a supervisor's rating of a subordinate on one trait biases the rating of that person on other traits.
Critical Incident Method
Strictness/Leniency
Low reliability across raters
Halo Effect
18. Common sources of error in performance evaluation - Response biases - Low reliability across raters
Three groups of appraisal methods
Effective PA systems
Performance Evaluation Error-Based Approach
Traits-oriented rating method
19. Having supervisors electronically monitor the amount of computerized data an employee is processing per day - and thereby his or her performance.
Traits-oriented rating method
Paired comparisons
Traditional View of Career Management
Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM)
20. Halo and Horn effects - Leniency and severity - Central tendency
Halo Effect
Common sources of error in performance appraisal
Behaviour-oriented rating method
Bias
21. An appraisal technique where a superior is required to compare each employee with every other employee in pairs and compute each one's overall rank based on the aggregating the ranks received in pairs.
Forced distribution
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
Paired comparisons
22. The assessment of employees on a set of behaviours identified as being related to job-performance. Leads to long-term employee perspectives. Many methods.
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Behaviour-oriented rating method
Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS)
Effective PA systems
23. Results-oriented appraisal system which sets specific goals and key result areas (KRA's) for each employee based on the overall goals of the organisation - and evaluates the employee's performance against such KRA's so that the evaluation is based o
Performance Management Definition
Low reliability across raters
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Behaviour-oriented rating method
24. Behaviour checklist - Graphic rating scales - Behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS) - Critical incidents method - Ranking of employees - Paired comparisons - Forced distribution
Career Management
Developing BARS
Performance Appraisal
Types of behaviour appraisals
25. The tendency to allow individual differences such as age - race and sex to affect the appraisal ratings employees receive.
Appraisal Interview
Performance appraisal interview process
Strictness/Leniency
Bias
26. Traits-oriented rating method - Behaviour-oriented rating method - Results-oriented rating method
Halo Effect
Effective PA systems
Alternation Ranking Method
Three groups of appraisal methods
27. The management of one's career with reference to one's life-goals rather than work goals - where the primary responsibility for managing career is with the individual not the organisation.
Unclear Standards
Low reliability across raters
Alternation Ranking Method
Protean Career Management
28. Ranking employees by making a chart of all possible pairs of the employees for each trait and indicating which is the better employee of the pair.
Unclear Standards
Common sources of error in performance appraisal
Performance Management
Paired Comparison Method
29. Keeping a record of uncommonly good or undesirable examples of an employee's work-related behaviour and reviewing it with the employee at predetermined times.
Developing BARS
Critical Incident Method
Graphic Rating Scale
Purpose of Career management
30. Personal biases/standards - Observation context - Observation timing - Cognitive processing (e.g emotions)
Bias
Forced Distribution Method
Graphic Rating Scale
Low reliability across raters
31. Similar to grading on a curve; predetermined percentages of ratees are placed in various performance categories.
Traits-oriented rating method
Forced Distribution Method
Performance Appraisal
Types of behaviour appraisals
32. EXLPORATION: >30 years who seeks to identify one's interests and skills and the job that fits with them ESTABLISHMENT: 30-45 years seeking growth and development MAINTENANCE: 45-60 years seeking to hold onto accomplishments and update skills DISENGAG
Effective PA systems
Critical incidents method
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM)
33. The assessment of employees on the extent to which the expected results have been achieved. Leads to short-term employee perspectives.
Results-oriented rating method
Purpose of Career management
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
34. Who conducts performance appraisals?
Upper management - Direct supervisor - Peers - Subordinates - External client - Self
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM)
Traits-oriented rating method
35. The problem that occurs when a supervisor tends to rate all subordinates either high or low.
Strictness/Leniency
Bias
Management by Objectives (MBO)
Developing BARS
36. Rank order - Paired comparisons - Forced distribution
Employee Comparisons of Appraisal Methods
Paired comparisons
Protean Career Management
Traits-oriented rating method
37. Progress was by vertical - upward movements in the same company for the high-performing employees.
Traditional View of Career Management
Purposes of PA Systems
Life-cycle model of career highlights
Performance Evaluation Error-Based Approach
38. Job related and based on JA - Properly administered (formal - standardized and straightforward)- Properly documented (PA ratings - interviews & goals) - Specific feedback (goal setting - T and D - Milestones) - Focus on behaviours rather than tra
Effective PA systems
Developing BARS
Central Tendency
Purposes of PA Systems
39. An appraisal that is too open to interpretation.
Forced distribution
Unclear Standards
Traditional View of Career Management
Bias
40. A system of ensuring the expected performance from employees through a process of - Clarifying expectations - Setting goals - Evaluating individual performance - Giving feedback and rewards
Performance Management Definition
Strictness/Leniency
Types of behaviour appraisals
Traits-oriented rating method