SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
Content validity
test - retest - reliability
reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
2. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
predictive validity/criterion validity
split - half reliability
correlational coefficient
The ABAB design
3. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
Content validity
concurrent validity
deductive method
4. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
deductive method
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
experimental will consist of
5. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
pretest - posttest control group design
The ABAB design
construct validity
validity
6. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
Content validity
only one group
inductive method
theory
7. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
ex post facto research
single subject designs
determinism
8. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
empiricism
predictive validity/criterion validity
correlational coefficient
deductive method
9. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
alternative hypothesis state
Content validity
independent variable
experiment
10. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
deductive method
correlational coefficient
null hypothesis
AB design
11. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
construct validity
control group
inductive method
predictive validity/criterion validity
12. There is no relationship between two measures
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
control group
null hypothesis
theory
13. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
alternative hypothesis state
independent variable
empiricism
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
14. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
reliability
ex post facto research
pretest - posttest control group design
deductive method
15. Observations and measurement
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
quantitative data
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
16. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
AB design
hypothesis
independent variable
empiricism
17. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
pretest - posttest control group design
sample
test - retest - reliability
empiricism
18. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
control group
predictive validity/criterion validity
inductive method
19. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
hypothesis
Content validity
predictive validity/criterion validity
validity
20. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
independent variable
single subject designs
split - half reliability
validity
21. Non - experimental will consist of
only one group
test - retest - reliability
predictive validity/criterion validity
single subject designs
22. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
alternative hypothesis state
determinism
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
experimental will consist of
23. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
determinism
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
alternative hypothesis state
24. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
dependent variable or effect
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
single subject designs
empiricism
25. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
research
AB design
inductive method
control group
26. Are verbal description of attributes of events
qualitative data
ex post facto research
null hypothesis
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
27. 1.00 and -1.00
reliability
concurrent validity
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
28. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
surveys
concurrent validity
29. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
construct validity
validity
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
concurrent validity
30. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
theory
hypothesis
Content validity
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
31. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
correlational coefficient
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
experimental will consist of
hypothesis
32. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
pretest - posttest control group design
mulitple baseline deisngs
Content validity
The researcher's hopes
33. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
Science
multigroup pretest - posttest design
34. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
35. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
multigroup pretest - posttest design
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
test - retest - reliability
research
36. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
Science
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
sample
theory
37. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
predictive validity/criterion validity
data
research
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
38. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
pretest - posttest control group design
hypothesis
experimental will consist of
inductive method
39. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
sample
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
40. Are numerical description of attributes of events
quantitative data
surveys
The ABAB design
correlational coefficient
41. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
theory
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
Content validity
control group
42. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
The researcher's hopes
determinism
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
Content validity
43. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
scientific data should meet these two criteria
test - retest - reliability
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
44. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
split - half reliability
dependent variable or effect
The researcher's hopes
45. States that 2 variables are not related
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
null hypothesis
data
46. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
null hypothesis
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
deductive method
47. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
multigroup pretest - posttest design
Science
pretest - posttest control group design
surveys
48. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
reliability
single subject designs
ex post facto research
experiment