SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
The ABAB design
dependent variable or effect
quantitative data
research
2. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
hypothesis
mulitple baseline deisngs
inductive method
Science
3. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
control group
surveys
theory
inductive method
4. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
ex post facto research
inductive method
experiment
The researcher's hopes
5. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
sample
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
independent variable
hypothesis
6. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
multigroup pretest - posttest design
The researcher's hopes
determinism
dependent variable or effect
7. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
determinism
qualitative data
experimental will consist of
concurrent validity
8. There is no relationship between two measures
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
Science
deductive method
empiricism
9. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
correlational coefficient
The researcher's hopes
sample
10. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
reliability
deductive method
pretest - posttest control group design
11. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
validity
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
theory
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
12. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
null hypothesis
construct validity
hypothesis
13. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
experiment
14. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
15. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
research
predictive validity/criterion validity
16. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
only one group
Content validity
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
split - half reliability
17. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
experimental will consist of
scientific data should meet these two criteria
single subject designs
18. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
dependent variable or effect
concurrent validity
deductive method
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
19. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
only one group
research
data
test - retest - reliability
20. 1.00 and -1.00
predictive validity/criterion validity
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
null hypothesis
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
21. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
predictive validity/criterion validity
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
deductive method
22. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
split - half reliability
pretest - posttest control group design
experimental will consist of
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
23. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
null hypothesis
single subject designs
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
independent variable
24. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
The ABAB design
control group
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
correlational coefficient
25. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
inductive method
AB design
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
control group
26. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
The ABAB design
mulitple baseline deisngs
ex post facto research
test - retest - reliability
27. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
pretest - posttest control group design
surveys
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
28. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
AB design
determinism
single subject designs
hypothesis
29. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
sample
Content validity
AB design
independent variable
30. States that 2 variables are not related
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
null hypothesis
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
only one group
31. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
alternative hypothesis state
experiment
The ABAB design
data
32. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
reliability
deductive method
test - retest - reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
33. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
concurrent validity
split - half reliability
qualitative data
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
34. Are numerical description of attributes of events
multigroup pretest - posttest design
quantitative data
construct validity
ex post facto research
35. Are verbal description of attributes of events
data
empiricism
qualitative data
reliability
36. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
sample
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
Content validity
quantitative data
37. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
concurrent validity
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
only one group
38. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
Science
split - half reliability
pretest - posttest control group design
test - retest - reliability
39. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
test - retest - reliability
deductive method
split - half reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
40. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
deductive method
determinism
control group
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
41. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
AB design
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
correlational coefficient
42. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
validity
control group
empiricism
multigroup pretest - posttest design
43. Observations and measurement
concurrent validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
research
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
44. Non - experimental will consist of
only one group
validity
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
sample
45. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
pretest - posttest control group design
theory
hypothesis
The ABAB design
46. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
qualitative data
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
test - retest - reliability
surveys
47. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
single subject designs
construct validity
scientific data should meet these two criteria
48. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
The ABAB design
alternative hypothesis state
empiricism
construct validity