SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
empiricism
ex post facto research
surveys
data
2. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
experiment
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
split - half reliability
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
3. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
hypothesis
validity
AB design
deductive method
4. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
sample
empiricism
pretest - posttest control group design
deductive method
5. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
predictive validity/criterion validity
only one group
The researcher's hopes
surveys
6. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
scientific data should meet these two criteria
single subject designs
7. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
inductive method
pretest - posttest control group design
theory
8. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
empiricism
concurrent validity
reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
9. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
Science
control group
The ABAB design
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
10. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
single subject designs
dependent variable or effect
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
null hypothesis
11. Observations and measurement
single subject designs
only one group
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
hypothesis
12. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
deductive method
construct validity
reliability
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
13. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
predictive validity/criterion validity
correlational coefficient
construct validity
surveys
14. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
experimental will consist of
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
15. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
test - retest - reliability
split - half reliability
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
sample
16. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
inductive method
data
correlational coefficient
independent variable
17. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
data
AB design
18. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
correlational coefficient
alternative hypothesis state
experiment
AB design
19. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
data
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
scientific data should meet these two criteria
hypothesis
20. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
ex post facto research
Content validity
concurrent validity
validity
21. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
theory
alternative hypothesis state
Science
22. There is no relationship between two measures
dependent variable or effect
deductive method
hypothesis
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
23. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
theory
experimental will consist of
hypothesis
The ABAB design
24. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
experimental will consist of
independent variable
inductive method
predictive validity/criterion validity
25. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
experimental will consist of
experiment
qualitative data
reliability
26. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
27. States that 2 variables are not related
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
null hypothesis
concurrent validity
28. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
scientific data should meet these two criteria
ex post facto research
correlational coefficient
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
29. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
pretest - posttest control group design
split - half reliability
reliability
empiricism
30. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
multigroup pretest - posttest design
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
mulitple baseline deisngs
31. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
only one group
independent variable
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
Science
32. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
scientific data should meet these two criteria
The researcher's hopes
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
concurrent validity
33. 1.00 and -1.00
concurrent validity
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
mulitple baseline deisngs
34. Are numerical description of attributes of events
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
quantitative data
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
experimental will consist of
35. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
predictive validity/criterion validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
sample
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
36. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
Science
experimental will consist of
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
The ABAB design
37. Non - experimental will consist of
single subject designs
sample
only one group
concurrent validity
38. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
control group
reliability
determinism
39. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
inductive method
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
scientific data should meet these two criteria
experimental will consist of
40. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
pretest - posttest control group design
theory
qualitative data
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
41. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
single subject designs
qualitative data
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
test - retest - reliability
42. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
reliability
hypothesis
only one group
43. Are verbal description of attributes of events
qualitative data
data
correlational coefficient
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
44. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
dependent variable or effect
multigroup pretest - posttest design
The researcher's hopes
ex post facto research
45. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
single subject designs
determinism
alternative hypothesis state
independent variable
46. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
data
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
research
47. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
inductive method
deductive method
validity
Content validity
48. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
deductive method
concurrent validity
ex post facto research
split - half reliability