SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
inductive method
The ABAB design
single subject designs
dependent variable or effect
2. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
control group
The ABAB design
correlational coefficient
empiricism
3. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
hypothesis
null hypothesis
theory
correlational coefficient
4. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
sample
data
null hypothesis
AB design
5. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
6. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
Science
qualitative data
alternative hypothesis state
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
7. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
correlational coefficient
validity
pretest - posttest control group design
ex post facto research
8. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
split - half reliability
The ABAB design
determinism
9. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
split - half reliability
theory
alternative hypothesis state
The researcher's hopes
10. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
Science
inductive method
sample
empiricism
11. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
empiricism
research
data
ex post facto research
12. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
correlational coefficient
ex post facto research
empiricism
split - half reliability
13. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
predictive validity/criterion validity
multigroup pretest - posttest design
scientific data should meet these two criteria
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
14. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
empiricism
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
predictive validity/criterion validity
15. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
data
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
split - half reliability
only one group
16. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
null hypothesis
deductive method
sample
The ABAB design
17. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
qualitative data
Science
dependent variable or effect
control group
18. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
experimental will consist of
The researcher's hopes
scientific data should meet these two criteria
19. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
surveys
scientific data should meet these two criteria
Content validity
independent variable
20. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
Content validity
surveys
empiricism
validity
21. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
reliability
null hypothesis
AB design
22. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
hypothesis
surveys
concurrent validity
determinism
23. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
empiricism
concurrent validity
experiment
24. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
reliability
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
predictive validity/criterion validity
The ABAB design
25. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
scientific data should meet these two criteria
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
test - retest - reliability
construct validity
26. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
inductive method
The researcher's hopes
27. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
construct validity
ex post facto research
Content validity
scientific data should meet these two criteria
28. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
The researcher's hopes
pretest - posttest control group design
inductive method
hypothesis
29. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
only one group
validity
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
30. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
research
control group
Science
dependent variable or effect
31. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
independent variable
empiricism
pretest - posttest control group design
concurrent validity
32. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
deductive method
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
independent variable
33. There is no relationship between two measures
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
sample
alternative hypothesis state
deductive method
34. Are verbal description of attributes of events
qualitative data
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
ex post facto research
AB design
35. Observations and measurement
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
AB design
construct validity
dependent variable or effect
36. States that 2 variables are not related
null hypothesis
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
surveys
mulitple baseline deisngs
37. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
surveys
Content validity
research
inductive method
38. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
experiment
qualitative data
inductive method
control group
39. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
research
mulitple baseline deisngs
experiment
predictive validity/criterion validity
40. 1.00 and -1.00
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
hypothesis
41. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
research
experiment
reliability
42. Non - experimental will consist of
The researcher's hopes
only one group
The ABAB design
deductive method
43. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
multigroup pretest - posttest design
predictive validity/criterion validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
44. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
test - retest - reliability
alternative hypothesis state
pretest - posttest control group design
experiment
45. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
independent variable
test - retest - reliability
experimental will consist of
46. Are numerical description of attributes of events
correlational coefficient
quantitative data
surveys
construct validity
47. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
construct validity
determinism
ex post facto research
concurrent validity
48. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
ex post facto research
experimental will consist of
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that