SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
validity
Science
concurrent validity
2. There is no relationship between two measures
Science
construct validity
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
test - retest - reliability
3. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
construct validity
Science
validity
4. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
Content validity
The ABAB design
independent variable
concurrent validity
5. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
Content validity
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
hypothesis
single subject designs
6. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
independent variable
theory
Content validity
experiment
7. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
deductive method
sample
inductive method
single subject designs
8. Are verbal description of attributes of events
data
qualitative data
The researcher's hopes
concurrent validity
9. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
reliability
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
quantitative data
concurrent validity
10. Non - experimental will consist of
split - half reliability
multigroup pretest - posttest design
only one group
The ABAB design
11. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
experimental will consist of
sample
ex post facto research
surveys
12. Observations and measurement
null hypothesis
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
control group
13. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
alternative hypothesis state
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
correlational coefficient
pretest - posttest control group design
14. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
concurrent validity
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
15. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
hypothesis
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
sample
inductive method
16. Are numerical description of attributes of events
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
inductive method
quantitative data
validity
17. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
hypothesis
Science
test - retest - reliability
18. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
predictive validity/criterion validity
alternative hypothesis state
concurrent validity
reliability
19. States that 2 variables are not related
null hypothesis
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
hypothesis
control group
20. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
alternative hypothesis state
surveys
mulitple baseline deisngs
21. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
quantitative data
validity
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
data
22. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
quantitative data
determinism
hypothesis
research
23. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
reliability
correlational coefficient
alternative hypothesis state
construct validity
24. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
qualitative data
scientific data should meet these two criteria
quantitative data
multigroup pretest - posttest design
25. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
Science
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
predictive validity/criterion validity
determinism
26. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
determinism
dependent variable or effect
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
experiment
27. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
empiricism
quantitative data
sample
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
28. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
split - half reliability
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
Science
29. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
independent variable
alternative hypothesis state
qualitative data
control group
30. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
AB design
deductive method
experimental will consist of
31. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
independent variable
reliability
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
theory
32. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
dependent variable or effect
The ABAB design
concurrent validity
ex post facto research
33. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
research
ex post facto research
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
inductive method
34. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
experiment
validity
35. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
ex post facto research
construct validity
reliability
test - retest - reliability
36. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
sample
theory
determinism
37. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
38. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
surveys
experimental will consist of
correlational coefficient
single subject designs
39. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
reliability
Science
mulitple baseline deisngs
The ABAB design
40. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
Science
ex post facto research
research
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
41. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
scientific data should meet these two criteria
only one group
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
42. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
data
scientific data should meet these two criteria
The ABAB design
43. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
determinism
deductive method
empiricism
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
44. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
experiment
experimental will consist of
single subject designs
sample
45. 1.00 and -1.00
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
scientific data should meet these two criteria
concurrent validity
reliability
46. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
inductive method
experimental will consist of
mulitple baseline deisngs
pretest - posttest control group design
47. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
control group
ex post facto research
Science
inductive method
48. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
validity
dependent variable or effect
The ABAB design
independent variable