SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
hypothesis
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
theory
2. There is no relationship between two measures
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
validity
The researcher's hopes
only one group
3. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
empiricism
ex post facto research
quantitative data
pretest - posttest control group design
4. 1.00 and -1.00
Content validity
multigroup pretest - posttest design
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
dependent variable or effect
5. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
independent variable
sample
empiricism
inductive method
6. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
pretest - posttest control group design
alternative hypothesis state
multigroup pretest - posttest design
scientific data should meet these two criteria
7. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
multigroup pretest - posttest design
hypothesis
alternative hypothesis state
inductive method
8. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
only one group
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
experiment
9. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
surveys
multigroup pretest - posttest design
experiment
concurrent validity
10. Observations and measurement
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
ex post facto research
qualitative data
11. States that 2 variables are not related
null hypothesis
pretest - posttest control group design
correlational coefficient
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
12. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
sample
multigroup pretest - posttest design
pretest - posttest control group design
13. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
scientific data should meet these two criteria
The researcher's hopes
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
concurrent validity
14. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
empiricism
sample
research
dependent variable or effect
15. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
The researcher's hopes
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
Science
16. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
reliability
ex post facto research
construct validity
pretest - posttest control group design
17. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
test - retest - reliability
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
quantitative data
determinism
18. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
mulitple baseline deisngs
predictive validity/criterion validity
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
quantitative data
19. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
Content validity
validity
experiment
determinism
20. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
dependent variable or effect
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
The ABAB design
single subject designs
21. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
correlational coefficient
test - retest - reliability
validity
inductive method
22. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
research
surveys
empiricism
validity
23. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
single subject designs
validity
ex post facto research
alternative hypothesis state
24. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
multigroup pretest - posttest design
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
ex post facto research
quantitative data
25. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
only one group
hypothesis
data
independent variable
26. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
correlational coefficient
determinism
inductive method
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
27. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
empiricism
dependent variable or effect
surveys
control group
28. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
data
predictive validity/criterion validity
reliability
29. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
predictive validity/criterion validity
The ABAB design
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
30. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
split - half reliability
scientific data should meet these two criteria
determinism
reliability
31. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
dependent variable or effect
experimental will consist of
qualitative data
surveys
32. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
alternative hypothesis state
Science
hypothesis
33. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
The researcher's hopes
surveys
predictive validity/criterion validity
sample
34. Are verbal description of attributes of events
qualitative data
only one group
The researcher's hopes
The ABAB design
35. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
Content validity
single subject designs
The ABAB design
concurrent validity
36. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
reliability
hypothesis
only one group
ex post facto research
37. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
construct validity
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
control group
The ABAB design
38. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
alternative hypothesis state
hypothesis
experimental will consist of
AB design
39. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
empiricism
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
Content validity
construct validity
40. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
sample
experiment
mulitple baseline deisngs
data
41. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
experimental will consist of
Content validity
split - half reliability
construct validity
42. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
split - half reliability
qualitative data
surveys
43. Non - experimental will consist of
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
only one group
reliability
quantitative data
44. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
single subject designs
experiment
sample
deductive method
45. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
AB design
concurrent validity
data
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
46. Are numerical description of attributes of events
quantitative data
predictive validity/criterion validity
independent variable
pretest - posttest control group design
47. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
hypothesis
determinism
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
48. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis