SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
concurrent validity
surveys
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
ex post facto research
2. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
empiricism
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
deductive method
single subject designs
3. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
deductive method
null hypothesis
split - half reliability
ex post facto research
4. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
ex post facto research
validity
reliability
predictive validity/criterion validity
5. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
validity
AB design
The ABAB design
single subject designs
6. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
test - retest - reliability
experiment
Science
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
7. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
pretest - posttest control group design
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
experiment
deductive method
8. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
mulitple baseline deisngs
correlational coefficient
construct validity
pretest - posttest control group design
9. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
deductive method
qualitative data
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
control group
10. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
alternative hypothesis state
scientific data should meet these two criteria
experimental will consist of
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
11. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
alternative hypothesis state
construct validity
reliability
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
12. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
reliability
sample
predictive validity/criterion validity
multigroup pretest - posttest design
13. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
multigroup pretest - posttest design
ex post facto research
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
reliability
14. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
deductive method
single subject designs
AB design
hypothesis
15. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
sample
independent variable
concurrent validity
scientific data should meet these two criteria
16. States that 2 variables are not related
correlational coefficient
data
null hypothesis
control group
17. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
control group
experiment
test - retest - reliability
qualitative data
18. Are verbal description of attributes of events
Content validity
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
predictive validity/criterion validity
qualitative data
19. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
20. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
ex post facto research
sample
Science
data
21. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
independent variable
sample
dependent variable or effect
concurrent validity
22. 1.00 and -1.00
split - half reliability
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
inductive method
23. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
concurrent validity
alternative hypothesis state
single subject designs
data
24. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
only one group
validity
hypothesis
single subject designs
25. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
research
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
split - half reliability
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
26. Are numerical description of attributes of events
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
experimental will consist of
qualitative data
quantitative data
27. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
split - half reliability
independent variable
mulitple baseline deisngs
dependent variable or effect
28. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
inductive method
research
pretest - posttest control group design
Content validity
29. There is no relationship between two measures
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
reliability
single subject designs
30. Non - experimental will consist of
The ABAB design
sample
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
only one group
31. Observations and measurement
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
split - half reliability
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
reliability
32. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
mulitple baseline deisngs
deductive method
only one group
The ABAB design
33. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
research
theory
construct validity
multigroup pretest - posttest design
34. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
test - retest - reliability
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
alternative hypothesis state
reliability
35. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
deductive method
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
hypothesis
correlational coefficient
36. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
theory
data
experimental will consist of
37. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
test - retest - reliability
control group
inductive method
AB design
38. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
qualitative data
independent variable
scientific data should meet these two criteria
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
39. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
determinism
multigroup pretest - posttest design
qualitative data
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
40. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
determinism
dependent variable or effect
qualitative data
construct validity
41. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
determinism
independent variable
empiricism
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
42. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
multigroup pretest - posttest design
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
reliability
AB design
43. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
experimental will consist of
pretest - posttest control group design
theory
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
44. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
research
concurrent validity
construct validity
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
45. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
theory
alternative hypothesis state
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
pretest - posttest control group design
46. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
dependent variable or effect
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
test - retest - reliability
surveys
47. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
correlational coefficient
theory
empiricism
split - half reliability
48. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
split - half reliability
reliability
construct validity
correlational coefficient