SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
experiment
predictive validity/criterion validity
only one group
theory
2. Observations and measurement
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
ex post facto research
surveys
3. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
construct validity
Science
null hypothesis
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
4. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
qualitative data
Science
experimental will consist of
split - half reliability
5. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
predictive validity/criterion validity
qualitative data
The researcher's hopes
data
6. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
data
multigroup pretest - posttest design
construct validity
validity
7. 1.00 and -1.00
The researcher's hopes
multigroup pretest - posttest design
determinism
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
8. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
quantitative data
only one group
ex post facto research
qualitative data
9. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
control group
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
reliability
research
10. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
AB design
concurrent validity
multigroup pretest - posttest design
single subject designs
11. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
experiment
scientific data should meet these two criteria
control group
hypothesis
12. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
independent variable
ex post facto research
concurrent validity
13. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
AB design
sample
validity
hypothesis
14. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
experimental will consist of
mulitple baseline deisngs
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
only one group
15. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
deductive method
Science
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
reliability
16. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
quantitative data
multigroup pretest - posttest design
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
dependent variable or effect
17. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
correlational coefficient
Content validity
control group
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
18. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
alternative hypothesis state
experimental will consist of
data
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
19. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
test - retest - reliability
multigroup pretest - posttest design
data
construct validity
20. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
sample
surveys
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
inductive method
21. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
22. States that 2 variables are not related
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
concurrent validity
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
null hypothesis
23. Non - experimental will consist of
qualitative data
dependent variable or effect
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
only one group
24. Are verbal description of attributes of events
Science
null hypothesis
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
qualitative data
25. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
experiment
research
Content validity
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
26. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
alternative hypothesis state
control group
correlational coefficient
independent variable
27. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
research
independent variable
quantitative data
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
28. There is no relationship between two measures
null hypothesis
single subject designs
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
AB design
29. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
inductive method
30. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
correlational coefficient
control group
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
31. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
predictive validity/criterion validity
experiment
empiricism
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
32. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
single subject designs
Science
qualitative data
33. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
predictive validity/criterion validity
AB design
reliability
The ABAB design
34. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
scientific data should meet these two criteria
split - half reliability
experiment
35. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
determinism
pretest - posttest control group design
alternative hypothesis state
qualitative data
36. Are numerical description of attributes of events
AB design
qualitative data
experiment
quantitative data
37. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
experimental will consist of
sample
AB design
mulitple baseline deisngs
38. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
split - half reliability
alternative hypothesis state
control group
research
39. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
independent variable
The ABAB design
experiment
Content validity
40. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
predictive validity/criterion validity
The ABAB design
pretest - posttest control group design
alternative hypothesis state
41. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
control group
The ABAB design
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
42. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
experiment
pretest - posttest control group design
empiricism
hypothesis
43. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
qualitative data
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
inductive method
44. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
experimental will consist of
Science
surveys
45. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
theory
data
control group
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
46. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
mulitple baseline deisngs
hypothesis
The researcher's hopes
experiment
47. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
correlational coefficient
single subject designs
dependent variable or effect
determinism
48. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
construct validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
data
events must be experienced in such a way to permit