SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
independent variable
Content validity
single subject designs
control group
2. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
empiricism
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
test - retest - reliability
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
3. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
quantitative data
inductive method
independent variable
4. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
hypothesis
ex post facto research
validity
independent variable
5. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
dependent variable or effect
concurrent validity
quantitative data
construct validity
6. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
dependent variable or effect
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
The ABAB design
7. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
experimental will consist of
correlational coefficient
pretest - posttest control group design
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
8. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
construct validity
test - retest - reliability
Science
correlational coefficient
9. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
predictive validity/criterion validity
control group
Science
correlational coefficient
10. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
determinism
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
empiricism
11. Are numerical description of attributes of events
Science
research
quantitative data
mulitple baseline deisngs
12. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
surveys
experimental will consist of
deductive method
pretest - posttest control group design
13. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
scientific data should meet these two criteria
data
only one group
Science
14. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
Science
validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
multigroup pretest - posttest design
15. Observations and measurement
inductive method
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
split - half reliability
The researcher's hopes
16. There is no relationship between two measures
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
Science
theory
split - half reliability
17. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
deductive method
ex post facto research
empiricism
multigroup pretest - posttest design
18. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
only one group
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
experiment
19. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
empiricism
correlational coefficient
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
20. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
reliability
Content validity
experiment
sample
21. Are verbal description of attributes of events
AB design
qualitative data
independent variable
The ABAB design
22. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
experimental will consist of
inductive method
data
determinism
23. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
AB design
hypothesis
control group
qualitative data
24. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
multigroup pretest - posttest design
The ABAB design
25. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
deductive method
AB design
correlational coefficient
26. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
null hypothesis
deductive method
reliability
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
27. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
Content validity
ex post facto research
empiricism
The researcher's hopes
28. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
inductive method
split - half reliability
scientific data should meet these two criteria
The ABAB design
29. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
control group
independent variable
qualitative data
empiricism
30. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
AB design
ex post facto research
data
qualitative data
31. States that 2 variables are not related
Content validity
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
null hypothesis
32. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
control group
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
33. 1.00 and -1.00
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
pretest - posttest control group design
quantitative data
34. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
reliability
theory
quantitative data
sample
35. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
independent variable
hypothesis
concurrent validity
36. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
concurrent validity
AB design
The researcher's hopes
37. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
surveys
validity
dependent variable or effect
38. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
test - retest - reliability
concurrent validity
pretest - posttest control group design
surveys
39. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
AB design
The researcher's hopes
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
inductive method
40. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
ex post facto research
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
research
experimental will consist of
41. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
multigroup pretest - posttest design
scientific data should meet these two criteria
Content validity
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
42. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
hypothesis
Science
theory
reliability
43. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
44. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
construct validity
predictive validity/criterion validity
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
single subject designs
45. Non - experimental will consist of
only one group
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
inductive method
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
46. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
alternative hypothesis state
experiment
validity
empiricism
47. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
theory
alternative hypothesis state
experiment
48. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
surveys
construct validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
hypothesis