SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
determinism
inductive method
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
reliability
2. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
concurrent validity
split - half reliability
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
3. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
single subject designs
validity
null hypothesis
4. There is no relationship between two measures
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
split - half reliability
predictive validity/criterion validity
inductive method
5. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
pretest - posttest control group design
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
empiricism
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
6. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
test - retest - reliability
hypothesis
mulitple baseline deisngs
Science
7. Observations and measurement
quantitative data
pretest - posttest control group design
sample
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
8. Non - experimental will consist of
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
dependent variable or effect
only one group
reliability
9. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
AB design
only one group
surveys
ex post facto research
10. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
qualitative data
AB design
Content validity
concurrent validity
11. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
dependent variable or effect
Science
test - retest - reliability
split - half reliability
12. Are numerical description of attributes of events
independent variable
experiment
quantitative data
control group
13. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
single subject designs
theory
data
pretest - posttest control group design
14. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
only one group
mulitple baseline deisngs
construct validity
independent variable
15. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
single subject designs
split - half reliability
AB design
determinism
16. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
inductive method
alternative hypothesis state
surveys
The ABAB design
17. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
quantitative data
only one group
correlational coefficient
hypothesis
18. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
multigroup pretest - posttest design
sample
The ABAB design
dependent variable or effect
19. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
single subject designs
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
20. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
experimental will consist of
mulitple baseline deisngs
predictive validity/criterion validity
Science
21. 1.00 and -1.00
only one group
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
theory
22. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
only one group
empiricism
alternative hypothesis state
correlational coefficient
23. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
alternative hypothesis state
independent variable
quantitative data
inductive method
24. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
predictive validity/criterion validity
construct validity
single subject designs
experiment
25. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
test - retest - reliability
split - half reliability
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
26. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
deductive method
surveys
independent variable
27. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
ex post facto research
correlational coefficient
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
multigroup pretest - posttest design
28. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
single subject designs
concurrent validity
control group
experimental will consist of
29. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
dependent variable or effect
hypothesis
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
30. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
The researcher's hopes
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
null hypothesis
31. Are verbal description of attributes of events
hypothesis
null hypothesis
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
qualitative data
32. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
alternative hypothesis state
hypothesis
data
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
33. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
empiricism
validity
ex post facto research
multigroup pretest - posttest design
34. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
hypothesis
control group
construct validity
only one group
35. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
The researcher's hopes
independent variable
data
mulitple baseline deisngs
36. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
construct validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
research
experimental will consist of
37. States that 2 variables are not related
qualitative data
determinism
null hypothesis
split - half reliability
38. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
predictive validity/criterion validity
split - half reliability
construct validity
The ABAB design
39. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
alternative hypothesis state
determinism
single subject designs
quantitative data
40. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
determinism
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
research
41. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
sample
hypothesis
test - retest - reliability
only one group
42. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
surveys
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
correlational coefficient
inductive method
43. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
44. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
Science
inductive method
scientific data should meet these two criteria
45. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
only one group
mulitple baseline deisngs
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
46. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
only one group
The ABAB design
hypothesis
qualitative data
47. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
correlational coefficient
reliability
dependent variable or effect
ex post facto research
48. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
single subject designs
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
reliability