SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
dependent variable or effect
split - half reliability
quantitative data
control group
2. 1.00 and -1.00
theory
hypothesis
single subject designs
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
3. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
concurrent validity
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
only one group
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
4. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
quantitative data
research
test - retest - reliability
reliability
5. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
Content validity
theory
AB design
only one group
6. There is no relationship between two measures
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
inductive method
predictive validity/criterion validity
determinism
7. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
experiment
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
independent variable
determinism
8. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
experiment
dependent variable or effect
single subject designs
The researcher's hopes
9. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
single subject designs
ex post facto research
inductive method
quantitative data
10. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
alternative hypothesis state
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
only one group
single subject designs
11. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
mulitple baseline deisngs
multigroup pretest - posttest design
sample
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
12. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
experiment
data
The researcher's hopes
13. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
mulitple baseline deisngs
predictive validity/criterion validity
multigroup pretest - posttest design
ex post facto research
14. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
scientific data should meet these two criteria
dependent variable or effect
research
reliability
15. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
reliability
split - half reliability
determinism
The ABAB design
16. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
experimental will consist of
surveys
AB design
dependent variable or effect
17. Are verbal description of attributes of events
empiricism
dependent variable or effect
research
qualitative data
18. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
predictive validity/criterion validity
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
sample
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
19. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
validity
deductive method
mulitple baseline deisngs
single subject designs
20. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
construct validity
concurrent validity
correlational coefficient
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
21. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
construct validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
AB design
research
22. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
Science
concurrent validity
single subject designs
23. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
control group
qualitative data
multigroup pretest - posttest design
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
24. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
surveys
reliability
25. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
split - half reliability
construct validity
qualitative data
26. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
alternative hypothesis state
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
AB design
dependent variable or effect
27. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
The ABAB design
scientific data should meet these two criteria
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
correlational coefficient
28. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
29. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
determinism
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
quantitative data
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
30. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
predictive validity/criterion validity
data
multigroup pretest - posttest design
31. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
hypothesis
The ABAB design
qualitative data
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
32. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
single subject designs
empiricism
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
33. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
empiricism
test - retest - reliability
ex post facto research
deductive method
34. States that 2 variables are not related
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
inductive method
null hypothesis
Science
35. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
construct validity
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
dependent variable or effect
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
36. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
inductive method
predictive validity/criterion validity
test - retest - reliability
empiricism
37. Observations and measurement
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
ex post facto research
empiricism
hypothesis
38. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
research
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
inductive method
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
39. Non - experimental will consist of
split - half reliability
test - retest - reliability
only one group
qualitative data
40. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
deductive method
pretest - posttest control group design
Content validity
experiment
41. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
qualitative data
AB design
predictive validity/criterion validity
validity
42. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
concurrent validity
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
surveys
43. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
experimental will consist of
data
Content validity
AB design
44. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
determinism
qualitative data
null hypothesis
validity
45. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
surveys
reliability
correlational coefficient
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
46. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
single subject designs
inductive method
alternative hypothesis state
experimental will consist of
47. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
scientific data should meet these two criteria
multigroup pretest - posttest design
experiment
48. Are numerical description of attributes of events
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
quantitative data
AB design
multigroup pretest - posttest design