SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
construct validity
test - retest - reliability
ex post facto research
quantitative data
2. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
test - retest - reliability
The ABAB design
hypothesis
data
3. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
theory
qualitative data
sample
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
4. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
test - retest - reliability
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
research
null hypothesis
5. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
split - half reliability
construct validity
single subject designs
surveys
6. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
split - half reliability
ex post facto research
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
7. Are numerical description of attributes of events
quantitative data
deductive method
determinism
ex post facto research
8. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
experimental will consist of
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
independent variable
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
9. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
dependent variable or effect
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
AB design
Content validity
10. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
determinism
quantitative data
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
control group
11. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
empiricism
12. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
research
concurrent validity
sample
reliability
13. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
AB design
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
alternative hypothesis state
14. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
validity
experimental will consist of
sample
only one group
15. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
inductive method
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
ex post facto research
single subject designs
16. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
concurrent validity
pretest - posttest control group design
experiment
AB design
17. 1.00 and -1.00
ex post facto research
alternative hypothesis state
data
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
18. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
validity
scientific data should meet these two criteria
ex post facto research
deductive method
19. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
Content validity
dependent variable or effect
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
Science
20. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
quantitative data
scientific data should meet these two criteria
predictive validity/criterion validity
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
21. States that 2 variables are not related
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
null hypothesis
validity
AB design
22. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
Science
correlational coefficient
independent variable
deductive method
23. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
predictive validity/criterion validity
AB design
sample
only one group
24. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
surveys
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
data
25. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
The ABAB design
independent variable
deductive method
test - retest - reliability
26. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
control group
alternative hypothesis state
AB design
hypothesis
27. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
dependent variable or effect
empiricism
quantitative data
mulitple baseline deisngs
28. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
hypothesis
data
qualitative data
construct validity
29. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
multigroup pretest - posttest design
split - half reliability
independent variable
30. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
single subject designs
predictive validity/criterion validity
alternative hypothesis state
The ABAB design
31. Non - experimental will consist of
mulitple baseline deisngs
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
only one group
32. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
research
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
theory
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
33. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
experiment
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
validity
multigroup pretest - posttest design
34. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
validity
scientific data should meet these two criteria
concurrent validity
reliability
35. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
inductive method
multigroup pretest - posttest design
36. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
37. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
null hypothesis
research
test - retest - reliability
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
38. There is no relationship between two measures
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
reliability
experiment
surveys
39. Are verbal description of attributes of events
multigroup pretest - posttest design
Content validity
qualitative data
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
40. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
concurrent validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
split - half reliability
experiment
41. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
alternative hypothesis state
The ABAB design
mulitple baseline deisngs
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
42. Observations and measurement
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
predictive validity/criterion validity
sample
determinism
43. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
only one group
validity
predictive validity/criterion validity
44. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
predictive validity/criterion validity
alternative hypothesis state
experimental will consist of
correlational coefficient
45. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
surveys
reliability
qualitative data
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
46. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
dependent variable or effect
alternative hypothesis state
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
correlational coefficient
47. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
scientific data should meet these two criteria
concurrent validity
The ABAB design
48. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
concurrent validity
data
split - half reliability
control group