SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. States that 2 variables are not related
scientific data should meet these two criteria
null hypothesis
data
dependent variable or effect
2. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
test - retest - reliability
Content validity
theory
sample
3. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
independent variable
correlational coefficient
ex post facto research
sample
4. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
construct validity
Science
inductive method
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
5. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
hypothesis
split - half reliability
data
control group
6. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
single subject designs
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
empiricism
reliability
7. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
The ABAB design
inductive method
8. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
reliability
sample
ex post facto research
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
9. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
theory
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
experimental will consist of
null hypothesis
10. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
sample
deductive method
multigroup pretest - posttest design
11. Are verbal description of attributes of events
The researcher's hopes
hypothesis
qualitative data
predictive validity/criterion validity
12. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
experiment
pretest - posttest control group design
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
13. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
surveys
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
single subject designs
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
14. 1.00 and -1.00
surveys
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
15. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
test - retest - reliability
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
validity
theory
16. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
inductive method
control group
AB design
17. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
scientific data should meet these two criteria
data
experimental will consist of
inductive method
18. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
split - half reliability
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
ex post facto research
experimental will consist of
19. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
control group
split - half reliability
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
scientific data should meet these two criteria
20. Are numerical description of attributes of events
research
quantitative data
alternative hypothesis state
control group
21. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
The researcher's hopes
Content validity
dependent variable or effect
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
22. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
only one group
The ABAB design
research
sample
23. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
split - half reliability
concurrent validity
empiricism
24. Observations and measurement
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
deductive method
Science
25. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
data
single subject designs
correlational coefficient
alternative hypothesis state
26. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
inductive method
data
27. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
multigroup pretest - posttest design
dependent variable or effect
predictive validity/criterion validity
test - retest - reliability
28. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
ex post facto research
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
alternative hypothesis state
data
29. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
independent variable
alternative hypothesis state
The ABAB design
Science
30. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
research
surveys
31. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
construct validity
pretest - posttest control group design
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
AB design
32. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
deductive method
independent variable
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
33. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
concurrent validity
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
predictive validity/criterion validity
The ABAB design
34. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
research
AB design
surveys
experiment
35. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
validity
Science
The ABAB design
36. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
correlational coefficient
test - retest - reliability
The ABAB design
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
37. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
deductive method
The researcher's hopes
null hypothesis
concurrent validity
38. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
pretest - posttest control group design
control group
sample
construct validity
39. Non - experimental will consist of
test - retest - reliability
correlational coefficient
single subject designs
only one group
40. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
validity
hypothesis
dependent variable or effect
predictive validity/criterion validity
41. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
predictive validity/criterion validity
ex post facto research
quantitative data
test - retest - reliability
42. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
sample
pretest - posttest control group design
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
determinism
43. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
44. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
concurrent validity
empiricism
determinism
45. There is no relationship between two measures
null hypothesis
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
hypothesis
46. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
Content validity
concurrent validity
theory
47. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
determinism
pretest - posttest control group design
correlational coefficient
experimental will consist of
48. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
validity
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
empiricism
AB design