SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
deductive method
scientific data should meet these two criteria
mulitple baseline deisngs
multigroup pretest - posttest design
2. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
The ABAB design
The researcher's hopes
construct validity
data
3. Non - experimental will consist of
concurrent validity
only one group
multigroup pretest - posttest design
dependent variable or effect
4. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
Science
single subject designs
dependent variable or effect
5. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
predictive validity/criterion validity
dependent variable or effect
hypothesis
sample
6. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
mulitple baseline deisngs
inductive method
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
7. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
concurrent validity
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
data
8. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
predictive validity/criterion validity
alternative hypothesis state
control group
theory
9. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
ex post facto research
research
10. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
determinism
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
dependent variable or effect
deductive method
11. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
12. Observations and measurement
Science
test - retest - reliability
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
13. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
dependent variable or effect
research
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
only one group
14. States that 2 variables are not related
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
null hypothesis
multigroup pretest - posttest design
surveys
15. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
alternative hypothesis state
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
construct validity
experimental will consist of
16. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
control group
pretest - posttest control group design
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
predictive validity/criterion validity
17. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
alternative hypothesis state
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
only one group
pretest - posttest control group design
18. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
dependent variable or effect
hypothesis
independent variable
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
19. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
The ABAB design
dependent variable or effect
Content validity
20. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
reliability
pretest - posttest control group design
alternative hypothesis state
qualitative data
21. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
construct validity
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
multigroup pretest - posttest design
deductive method
22. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
AB design
deductive method
construct validity
test - retest - reliability
23. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
quantitative data
data
experimental will consist of
split - half reliability
24. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
sample
theory
multigroup pretest - posttest design
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
25. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
inductive method
reliability
empiricism
AB design
26. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
The ABAB design
quantitative data
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
27. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
single subject designs
experimental will consist of
ex post facto research
research
28. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
inductive method
split - half reliability
ex post facto research
experiment
29. Are numerical description of attributes of events
construct validity
quantitative data
Content validity
determinism
30. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
sample
experiment
independent variable
correlational coefficient
31. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
control group
surveys
alternative hypothesis state
dependent variable or effect
32. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
hypothesis
quantitative data
research
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
33. Are verbal description of attributes of events
ex post facto research
predictive validity/criterion validity
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
qualitative data
34. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
mulitple baseline deisngs
sample
deductive method
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
35. There is no relationship between two measures
split - half reliability
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
The ABAB design
Science
36. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
dependent variable or effect
qualitative data
empiricism
single subject designs
37. 1.00 and -1.00
pretest - posttest control group design
Content validity
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
research
38. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
reliability
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
experiment
39. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
hypothesis
research
correlational coefficient
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
40. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
theory
quantitative data
control group
experiment
41. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
experimental will consist of
data
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
control group
42. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
concurrent validity
independent variable
deductive method
theory
43. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
concurrent validity
experiment
44. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
determinism
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
single subject designs
45. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
mulitple baseline deisngs
independent variable
scientific data should meet these two criteria
dependent variable or effect
46. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
Content validity
experimental will consist of
47. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
null hypothesis
single subject designs
hypothesis
48. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
validity
quantitative data
alternative hypothesis state
single subject designs