SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
data
experiment
Science
concurrent validity
2. States that 2 variables are not related
split - half reliability
alternative hypothesis state
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
null hypothesis
3. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
surveys
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
split - half reliability
deductive method
4. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
test - retest - reliability
theory
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
multigroup pretest - posttest design
5. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
Science
predictive validity/criterion validity
split - half reliability
6. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
inductive method
Content validity
null hypothesis
7. Non - experimental will consist of
scientific data should meet these two criteria
The ABAB design
research
only one group
8. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
test - retest - reliability
theory
data
9. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
10. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
data
construct validity
multigroup pretest - posttest design
11. Are verbal description of attributes of events
qualitative data
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
12. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
AB design
research
experimental will consist of
13. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
inductive method
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
multigroup pretest - posttest design
control group
14. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
surveys
empiricism
sample
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
15. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
single subject designs
research
null hypothesis
only one group
16. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
research
multigroup pretest - posttest design
construct validity
17. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
pretest - posttest control group design
qualitative data
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
hypothesis
18. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
19. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
data
hypothesis
empiricism
predictive validity/criterion validity
20. Observations and measurement
The ABAB design
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
deductive method
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
21. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
Science
ex post facto research
predictive validity/criterion validity
data
22. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
dependent variable or effect
research
Science
concurrent validity
23. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
reliability
predictive validity/criterion validity
inductive method
quantitative data
24. 1.00 and -1.00
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
sample
pretest - posttest control group design
25. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
experimental will consist of
ex post facto research
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
experiment
26. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
The ABAB design
concurrent validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
predictive validity/criterion validity
27. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
sample
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
pretest - posttest control group design
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
28. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
concurrent validity
empiricism
Science
control group
29. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
multigroup pretest - posttest design
alternative hypothesis state
Science
pretest - posttest control group design
30. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
experimental will consist of
mulitple baseline deisngs
sample
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
31. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
correlational coefficient
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
mulitple baseline deisngs
32. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
validity
AB design
determinism
Science
33. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
single subject designs
independent variable
experiment
empiricism
34. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
scientific data should meet these two criteria
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
research
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
35. There is no relationship between two measures
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
reliability
36. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
dependent variable or effect
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
37. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
quantitative data
control group
independent variable
test - retest - reliability
38. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
quantitative data
Content validity
surveys
empiricism
39. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
scientific data should meet these two criteria
experiment
40. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
empiricism
deductive method
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
research
41. Are numerical description of attributes of events
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
quantitative data
construct validity
alternative hypothesis state
42. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
validity
predictive validity/criterion validity
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
43. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
theory
ex post facto research
AB design
44. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
null hypothesis
quantitative data
pretest - posttest control group design
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
45. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
experimental will consist of
Content validity
independent variable
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
46. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
split - half reliability
validity
theory
predictive validity/criterion validity
47. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
deductive method
determinism
predictive validity/criterion validity
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
48. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
concurrent validity
independent variable
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
pretest - posttest control group design