SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
test - retest - reliability
research
Content validity
data
2. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
pretest - posttest control group design
Content validity
control group
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
3. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
test - retest - reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
correlational coefficient
experiment
4. Are numerical description of attributes of events
The ABAB design
quantitative data
data
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
5. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
pretest - posttest control group design
alternative hypothesis state
empiricism
6. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
dependent variable or effect
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
AB design
quantitative data
7. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
multigroup pretest - posttest design
construct validity
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
surveys
8. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
single subject designs
mulitple baseline deisngs
surveys
9. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
single subject designs
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
predictive validity/criterion validity
data
10. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
research
surveys
deductive method
control group
11. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
scientific data should meet these two criteria
inductive method
12. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
empiricism
single subject designs
inductive method
concurrent validity
13. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
control group
Science
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
ex post facto research
14. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
The researcher's hopes
concurrent validity
scientific data should meet these two criteria
predictive validity/criterion validity
15. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
hypothesis
experimental will consist of
empiricism
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
16. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
sample
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
qualitative data
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
17. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
null hypothesis
alternative hypothesis state
Content validity
determinism
18. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
19. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
construct validity
The ABAB design
sample
split - half reliability
20. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
hypothesis
theory
Content validity
21. Observations and measurement
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
Science
predictive validity/criterion validity
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
22. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
pretest - posttest control group design
independent variable
construct validity
Science
23. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
dependent variable or effect
hypothesis
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
Science
24. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
deductive method
control group
validity
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
25. Are verbal description of attributes of events
qualitative data
predictive validity/criterion validity
inductive method
dependent variable or effect
26. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
concurrent validity
Content validity
split - half reliability
27. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
hypothesis
validity
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
28. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
correlational coefficient
AB design
29. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
construct validity
qualitative data
sample
correlational coefficient
30. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
experimental will consist of
qualitative data
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
test - retest - reliability
31. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
scientific data should meet these two criteria
surveys
pretest - posttest control group design
The researcher's hopes
32. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
split - half reliability
The ABAB design
dependent variable or effect
The researcher's hopes
33. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
multigroup pretest - posttest design
reliability
empiricism
The ABAB design
34. There is no relationship between two measures
correlational coefficient
mulitple baseline deisngs
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
sample
35. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
qualitative data
determinism
predictive validity/criterion validity
independent variable
36. 1.00 and -1.00
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
dependent variable or effect
quantitative data
construct validity
37. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
null hypothesis
empiricism
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
predictive validity/criterion validity
38. States that 2 variables are not related
null hypothesis
correlational coefficient
Content validity
split - half reliability
39. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
test - retest - reliability
inductive method
validity
reliability
40. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
independent variable
validity
Content validity
data
41. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
The researcher's hopes
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
AB design
42. Non - experimental will consist of
multigroup pretest - posttest design
only one group
independent variable
correlational coefficient
43. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
ex post facto research
only one group
empiricism
surveys
44. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
sample
construct validity
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
experimental will consist of
45. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
research
independent variable
Science
46. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
independent variable
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
theory
validity
47. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
data
test - retest - reliability
mulitple baseline deisngs
The researcher's hopes
48. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
concurrent validity
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
inductive method
The ABAB design