SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
test - retest - reliability
Science
determinism
pretest - posttest control group design
2. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
AB design
concurrent validity
only one group
3. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
reliability
experiment
The ABAB design
quantitative data
4. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
experimental will consist of
hypothesis
determinism
correlational coefficient
5. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
validity
empiricism
mulitple baseline deisngs
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
6. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
surveys
hypothesis
single subject designs
7. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
sample
research
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
hypothesis
8. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
independent variable
empiricism
split - half reliability
ex post facto research
9. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
reliability
quantitative data
10. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
reliability
empiricism
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
experiment
11. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
experiment
construct validity
qualitative data
12. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
The ABAB design
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
inductive method
13. Observations and measurement
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
scientific data should meet these two criteria
alternative hypothesis state
surveys
14. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
The ABAB design
inductive method
null hypothesis
15. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
research
multigroup pretest - posttest design
test - retest - reliability
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
16. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
scientific data should meet these two criteria
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
inductive method
multigroup pretest - posttest design
17. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
independent variable
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
hypothesis
18. Are numerical description of attributes of events
experimental will consist of
research
mulitple baseline deisngs
quantitative data
19. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
20. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
empiricism
research
experimental will consist of
determinism
21. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
predictive validity/criterion validity
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
hypothesis
data
22. 1.00 and -1.00
experimental will consist of
data
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
23. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
theory
scientific data should meet these two criteria
validity
reliability
24. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
correlational coefficient
The ABAB design
dependent variable or effect
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
25. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
empiricism
pretest - posttest control group design
deductive method
26. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
research
experiment
qualitative data
inductive method
27. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
theory
The ABAB design
multigroup pretest - posttest design
quantitative data
28. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
deductive method
Content validity
data
29. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
Science
The ABAB design
concurrent validity
dependent variable or effect
30. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
The researcher's hopes
single subject designs
AB design
The ABAB design
31. There is no relationship between two measures
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
inductive method
sample
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
32. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
empiricism
ex post facto research
The researcher's hopes
determinism
33. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
The researcher's hopes
scientific data should meet these two criteria
validity
Science
34. Are verbal description of attributes of events
construct validity
single subject designs
multigroup pretest - posttest design
qualitative data
35. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
reliability
split - half reliability
theory
alternative hypothesis state
36. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
reliability
data
inductive method
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
37. Non - experimental will consist of
validity
only one group
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
data
38. States that 2 variables are not related
Science
mulitple baseline deisngs
null hypothesis
The researcher's hopes
39. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
theory
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
ex post facto research
predictive validity/criterion validity
40. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
empiricism
control group
theory
concurrent validity
41. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
surveys
experiment
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
42. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
construct validity
multigroup pretest - posttest design
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
43. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
surveys
correlational coefficient
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
44. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
inductive method
sample
reliability
concurrent validity
45. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
alternative hypothesis state
The ABAB design
Science
experimental will consist of
46. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
empiricism
control group
47. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
scientific data should meet these two criteria
ex post facto research
Content validity
test - retest - reliability
48. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
experiment