SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
research
test - retest - reliability
scientific data should meet these two criteria
mulitple baseline deisngs
2. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
alternative hypothesis state
validity
empiricism
null hypothesis
3. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
determinism
experiment
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
The researcher's hopes
4. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
Science
pretest - posttest control group design
null hypothesis
The ABAB design
5. Non - experimental will consist of
scientific data should meet these two criteria
only one group
Content validity
construct validity
6. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
experiment
pretest - posttest control group design
Content validity
correlational coefficient
7. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
qualitative data
independent variable
8. 1.00 and -1.00
alternative hypothesis state
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
theory
scientific data should meet these two criteria
9. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
hypothesis
quantitative data
construct validity
AB design
10. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
scientific data should meet these two criteria
construct validity
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
correlational coefficient
11. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
inductive method
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
pretest - posttest control group design
alternative hypothesis state
12. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
13. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
dependent variable or effect
experimental will consist of
concurrent validity
determinism
14. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
ex post facto research
mulitple baseline deisngs
sample
control group
15. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
scientific data should meet these two criteria
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
control group
ex post facto research
16. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
deductive method
The ABAB design
determinism
alternative hypothesis state
17. States that 2 variables are not related
experiment
null hypothesis
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
18. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
scientific data should meet these two criteria
quantitative data
dependent variable or effect
mulitple baseline deisngs
19. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
multigroup pretest - posttest design
reliability
split - half reliability
AB design
20. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
mulitple baseline deisngs
control group
experimental will consist of
determinism
21. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
split - half reliability
hypothesis
null hypothesis
22. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
pretest - posttest control group design
inductive method
determinism
reliability
23. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
split - half reliability
concurrent validity
pretest - posttest control group design
validity
24. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
AB design
inductive method
single subject designs
deductive method
25. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
reliability
theory
construct validity
26. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
Science
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
construct validity
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
27. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
hypothesis
28. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
surveys
ex post facto research
deductive method
29. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
surveys
null hypothesis
reliability
split - half reliability
30. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
construct validity
The ABAB design
ex post facto research
sample
31. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
dependent variable or effect
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
multigroup pretest - posttest design
mulitple baseline deisngs
32. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
Science
independent variable
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
multigroup pretest - posttest design
33. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
inductive method
multigroup pretest - posttest design
reliability
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
34. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
sample
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
null hypothesis
35. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
independent variable
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
data
36. Observations and measurement
correlational coefficient
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
ex post facto research
37. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
test - retest - reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
The researcher's hopes
sample
38. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
experiment
determinism
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
single subject designs
39. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
Science
construct validity
test - retest - reliability
multigroup pretest - posttest design
40. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
qualitative data
scientific data should meet these two criteria
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
41. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
validity
Content validity
control group
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
42. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
independent variable
qualitative data
ex post facto research
research
43. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
correlational coefficient
research
predictive validity/criterion validity
qualitative data
44. Are numerical description of attributes of events
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
quantitative data
reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
45. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
null hypothesis
predictive validity/criterion validity
deductive method
dependent variable or effect
46. Are verbal description of attributes of events
qualitative data
predictive validity/criterion validity
determinism
quantitative data
47. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
scientific data should meet these two criteria
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
empiricism
construct validity
48. There is no relationship between two measures
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
research
single subject designs
predictive validity/criterion validity