SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Observations and measurement
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
sample
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
mulitple baseline deisngs
2. There is no relationship between two measures
quantitative data
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
surveys
experiment
3. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
experiment
deductive method
hypothesis
4. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
quantitative data
pretest - posttest control group design
concurrent validity
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
5. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
reliability
surveys
validity
6. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
independent variable
experiment
concurrent validity
sample
7. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
control group
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
dependent variable or effect
8. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
experimental will consist of
test - retest - reliability
only one group
reliability
9. Are verbal description of attributes of events
The ABAB design
qualitative data
test - retest - reliability
control group
10. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
empiricism
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
Science
11. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
construct validity
dependent variable or effect
experiment
pretest - posttest control group design
12. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
single subject designs
hypothesis
split - half reliability
The ABAB design
13. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
pretest - posttest control group design
quantitative data
independent variable
surveys
14. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
reliability
pretest - posttest control group design
alternative hypothesis state
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
15. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
inductive method
research
hypothesis
scientific data should meet these two criteria
16. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
independent variable
experimental will consist of
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
single subject designs
17. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
qualitative data
null hypothesis
reliability
18. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
mulitple baseline deisngs
ex post facto research
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
19. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
alternative hypothesis state
surveys
predictive validity/criterion validity
experimental will consist of
20. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
multigroup pretest - posttest design
concurrent validity
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
21. States that 2 variables are not related
empiricism
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
null hypothesis
22. 1.00 and -1.00
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
Science
reliability
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
23. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
construct validity
The ABAB design
data
multigroup pretest - posttest design
24. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
surveys
test - retest - reliability
ex post facto research
only one group
25. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
The ABAB design
split - half reliability
research
test - retest - reliability
26. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
surveys
AB design
correlational coefficient
test - retest - reliability
27. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
control group
null hypothesis
construct validity
theory
28. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
hypothesis
validity
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
29. Non - experimental will consist of
inductive method
only one group
single subject designs
scientific data should meet these two criteria
30. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
mulitple baseline deisngs
empiricism
validity
test - retest - reliability
31. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
Content validity
Science
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
theory
32. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
Content validity
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
independent variable
mulitple baseline deisngs
33. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
34. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
Science
mulitple baseline deisngs
split - half reliability
The researcher's hopes
35. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
alternative hypothesis state
AB design
construct validity
36. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
theory
The ABAB design
experiment
control group
37. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
predictive validity/criterion validity
Content validity
correlational coefficient
mulitple baseline deisngs
38. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
correlational coefficient
single subject designs
validity
39. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
deductive method
reliability
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
40. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
Content validity
only one group
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
correlational coefficient
41. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
determinism
only one group
The researcher's hopes
42. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
empiricism
theory
test - retest - reliability
mulitple baseline deisngs
43. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
construct validity
multigroup pretest - posttest design
split - half reliability
experiment
44. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
ex post facto research
scientific data should meet these two criteria
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
45. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
predictive validity/criterion validity
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
deductive method
validity
46. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
research
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
AB design
47. Are numerical description of attributes of events
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
data
quantitative data
48. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
empiricism
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
single subject designs
qualitative data