SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
data
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
validity
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
2. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
correlational coefficient
scientific data should meet these two criteria
hypothesis
experiment
3. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
sample
empiricism
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
4. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
AB design
dependent variable or effect
Content validity
qualitative data
5. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
pretest - posttest control group design
construct validity
only one group
Content validity
6. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
7. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
determinism
alternative hypothesis state
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
reliability
8. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
reliability
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
sample
9. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
inductive method
deductive method
alternative hypothesis state
single subject designs
10. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
Content validity
control group
AB design
validity
11. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
data
The ABAB design
sample
reliability
12. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
correlational coefficient
control group
sample
test - retest - reliability
13. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
theory
Science
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
split - half reliability
14. States that 2 variables are not related
validity
Content validity
null hypothesis
single subject designs
15. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
single subject designs
construct validity
reliability
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
16. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
alternative hypothesis state
AB design
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
empiricism
17. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
inductive method
theory
research
experimental will consist of
18. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
research
mulitple baseline deisngs
quantitative data
split - half reliability
19. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
surveys
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
split - half reliability
experiment
20. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
empiricism
scientific data should meet these two criteria
determinism
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
21. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
null hypothesis
quantitative data
predictive validity/criterion validity
qualitative data
22. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
inductive method
Content validity
predictive validity/criterion validity
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
23. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
correlational coefficient
test - retest - reliability
qualitative data
24. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
deductive method
construct validity
research
empiricism
25. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
pretest - posttest control group design
construct validity
correlational coefficient
ex post facto research
26. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
null hypothesis
inductive method
scientific data should meet these two criteria
Content validity
27. Observations and measurement
multigroup pretest - posttest design
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
empiricism
control group
28. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
deductive method
mulitple baseline deisngs
scientific data should meet these two criteria
qualitative data
29. Are numerical description of attributes of events
The ABAB design
dependent variable or effect
quantitative data
deductive method
30. Non - experimental will consist of
quantitative data
pretest - posttest control group design
reliability
only one group
31. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
concurrent validity
correlational coefficient
experiment
reliability
32. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
empiricism
dependent variable or effect
experimental will consist of
concurrent validity
33. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
alternative hypothesis state
surveys
quantitative data
control group
34. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
qualitative data
determinism
test - retest - reliability
multigroup pretest - posttest design
35. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
pretest - posttest control group design
split - half reliability
independent variable
alternative hypothesis state
36. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
quantitative data
dependent variable or effect
Science
37. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
AB design
The ABAB design
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
deductive method
38. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
pretest - posttest control group design
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
null hypothesis
quantitative data
39. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
pretest - posttest control group design
independent variable
correlational coefficient
data
40. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
independent variable
construct validity
alternative hypothesis state
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
41. Are verbal description of attributes of events
independent variable
qualitative data
split - half reliability
ex post facto research
42. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
null hypothesis
split - half reliability
The ABAB design
ex post facto research
43. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
reliability
The researcher's hopes
validity
correlational coefficient
44. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
single subject designs
construct validity
scientific data should meet these two criteria
alternative hypothesis state
45. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
research
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
only one group
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
46. There is no relationship between two measures
pretest - posttest control group design
The researcher's hopes
quantitative data
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
47. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
multigroup pretest - posttest design
research
pretest - posttest control group design
experiment
48. 1.00 and -1.00
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
split - half reliability
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
experimental will consist of
Sorry!:) No result found.
Can you answer 50 questions in 15 minutes?
Let me suggest you:
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests
Major Subjects
Tests & Exams
AP
CLEP
DSST
GRE
SAT
GMAT
Certifications
CISSP go to https://www.isc2.org/
PMP
ITIL
RHCE
MCTS
More...
IT Skills
Android Programming
Data Modeling
Objective C Programming
Basic Python Programming
Adobe Illustrator
More...
Business Skills
Advertising Techniques
Business Accounting Basics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
Marketing Basics
More...
Soft Skills
Body Language
People Skills
Public Speaking
Persuasion
Job Hunting And Resumes
More...
Vocabulary
GRE Vocab
SAT Vocab
TOEFL Essential Vocab
Basic English Words For All
Global Words You Should Know
Business English
More...
Languages
AP German Vocab
AP Latin Vocab
SAT Subject Test: French
Italian Survival
Norwegian Survival
More...
Engineering
Audio Engineering
Computer Science Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Structural Engineering
More...
Health Sciences
Basic Nursing Skills
Health Science Language Fundamentals
Veterinary Technology Medical Language
Cardiology
Clinical Surgery
More...
English
Grammar Fundamentals
Literary And Rhetorical Vocab
Elements Of Style Vocab
Introduction To English Major
Complete Advanced Sentences
Literature
Homonyms
More...
Math
Algebra Formulas
Basic Arithmetic: Measurements
Metric Conversions
Geometric Properties
Important Math Facts
Number Sense Vocab
Business Math
More...
Other Major Subjects
Science
Economics
History
Law
Performing-arts
Cooking
Logic & Reasoning
Trivia
Browse all subjects
Browse all tests
Most popular tests