SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
alternative hypothesis state
inductive method
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
deductive method
2. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
hypothesis
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
split - half reliability
surveys
3. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
split - half reliability
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
scientific data should meet these two criteria
Content validity
4. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
multigroup pretest - posttest design
determinism
qualitative data
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
5. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
AB design
test - retest - reliability
6. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
hypothesis
only one group
7. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
8. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
null hypothesis
experiment
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
experimental will consist of
9. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
concurrent validity
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
inductive method
empiricism
10. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
predictive validity/criterion validity
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
ex post facto research
11. Are verbal description of attributes of events
single subject designs
AB design
reliability
qualitative data
12. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
split - half reliability
ex post facto research
test - retest - reliability
13. Are numerical description of attributes of events
quantitative data
correlational coefficient
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
surveys
14. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
reliability
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
single subject designs
multigroup pretest - posttest design
15. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
empiricism
inductive method
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
test - retest - reliability
16. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
scientific data should meet these two criteria
determinism
experiment
split - half reliability
17. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
research
mulitple baseline deisngs
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
predictive validity/criterion validity
18. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
independent variable
experimental will consist of
Science
pretest - posttest control group design
19. There is no relationship between two measures
AB design
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
alternative hypothesis state
dependent variable or effect
20. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
sample
dependent variable or effect
ex post facto research
21. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
pretest - posttest control group design
alternative hypothesis state
validity
22. States that 2 variables are not related
theory
The ABAB design
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
null hypothesis
23. 1.00 and -1.00
only one group
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
test - retest - reliability
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
24. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
split - half reliability
empiricism
dependent variable or effect
25. Non - experimental will consist of
only one group
Science
independent variable
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
26. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
sample
pretest - posttest control group design
mulitple baseline deisngs
qualitative data
27. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
predictive validity/criterion validity
control group
alternative hypothesis state
multigroup pretest - posttest design
28. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
inductive method
AB design
predictive validity/criterion validity
Content validity
29. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
deductive method
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
scientific data should meet these two criteria
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
30. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
alternative hypothesis state
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
scientific data should meet these two criteria
independent variable
31. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
control group
The ABAB design
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
construct validity
32. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
deductive method
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
concurrent validity
33. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
ex post facto research
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
surveys
data
34. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
empiricism
validity
deductive method
predictive validity/criterion validity
35. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
correlational coefficient
control group
36. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
surveys
independent variable
experimental will consist of
data
37. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
data
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
experiment
Content validity
38. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
alternative hypothesis state
hypothesis
empiricism
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
39. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
surveys
deductive method
reliability
data
40. Observations and measurement
The ABAB design
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
The researcher's hopes
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
41. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
predictive validity/criterion validity
The researcher's hopes
Science
theory
42. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
construct validity
data
research
43. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
pretest - posttest control group design
only one group
reliability
correlational coefficient
44. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
alternative hypothesis state
construct validity
deductive method
pretest - posttest control group design
45. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
quantitative data
dependent variable or effect
46. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
AB design
data
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
47. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
test - retest - reliability
The researcher's hopes
validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
48. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
control group
pretest - posttest control group design
data
experiment