SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
alternative hypothesis state
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
experiment
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
2. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/var/www/html/basicversity.com/show_quiz.php
on line
183
3. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
construct validity
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
single subject designs
predictive validity/criterion validity
4. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
empiricism
construct validity
independent variable
AB design
5. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
experimental will consist of
qualitative data
hypothesis
multigroup pretest - posttest design
6. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
Science
surveys
AB design
7. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
concurrent validity
control group
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
scientific data should meet these two criteria
8. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
pretest - posttest control group design
dependent variable or effect
single subject designs
9. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
The researcher's hopes
scientific data should meet these two criteria
quantitative data
theory
10. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
experimental will consist of
hypothesis
deductive method
reliability
11. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
AB design
surveys
theory
12. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
pretest - posttest control group design
predictive validity/criterion validity
independent variable
quantitative data
13. There is no relationship between two measures
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
qualitative data
theory
only one group
14. Observations and measurement
reliability
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
experiment
15. Are numerical description of attributes of events
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
independent variable
quantitative data
scientific data should meet these two criteria
16. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
deductive method
test - retest - reliability
mulitple baseline deisngs
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
17. Non - experimental will consist of
determinism
reliability
only one group
scientific data should meet these two criteria
18. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
split - half reliability
inductive method
single subject designs
concurrent validity
19. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
surveys
quantitative data
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
ex post facto research
20. Are verbal description of attributes of events
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
alternative hypothesis state
qualitative data
construct validity
21. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
single subject designs
control group
scientific data should meet these two criteria
data
22. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
test - retest - reliability
Content validity
The ABAB design
hypothesis
23. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
hypothesis
deductive method
data
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
24. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
correlational coefficient
alternative hypothesis state
empiricism
data
25. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
alternative hypothesis state
ex post facto research
experimental will consist of
26. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
control group
determinism
construct validity
scientific data should meet these two criteria
27. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
determinism
experiment
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
surveys
28. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
empiricism
hypothesis
The ABAB design
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
29. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
split - half reliability
dependent variable or effect
null hypothesis
scientific data should meet these two criteria
30. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
data
construct validity
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
alternative hypothesis state
31. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
data
inductive method
surveys
The researcher's hopes
32. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
hypothesis
single subject designs
alternative hypothesis state
deductive method
33. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
AB design
correlational coefficient
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
34. States that 2 variables are not related
theory
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
independent variable
null hypothesis
35. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
ex post facto research
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
test - retest - reliability
The researcher's hopes
36. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
The ABAB design
dependent variable or effect
null hypothesis
sample
37. 1.00 and -1.00
Science
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
ex post facto research
38. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
inductive method
surveys
multigroup pretest - posttest design
The researcher's hopes
39. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
alternative hypothesis state
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
experimental will consist of
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
40. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
only one group
multigroup pretest - posttest design
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
alternative hypothesis state
41. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
research
inductive method
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
42. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
empiricism
mulitple baseline deisngs
43. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
The researcher's hopes
inductive method
44. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
mulitple baseline deisngs
control group
Content validity
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
45. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
experiment
scientific data should meet these two criteria
quantitative data
mulitple baseline deisngs
46. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
The ABAB design
single subject designs
pretest - posttest control group design
47. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
construct validity
data
validity
control group
48. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
construct validity
reliability
theory
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability