SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
AB design
Science
concurrent validity
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
2. Observations and measurement
qualitative data
mulitple baseline deisngs
predictive validity/criterion validity
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
3. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
control group
null hypothesis
research
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
4. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
single subject designs
inductive method
qualitative data
scientific data should meet these two criteria
5. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
correlational coefficient
construct validity
mulitple baseline deisngs
concurrent validity
6. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
determinism
ex post facto research
AB design
The ABAB design
7. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
test - retest - reliability
predictive validity/criterion validity
surveys
independent variable
8. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
mulitple baseline deisngs
theory
data
deductive method
9. Are numerical description of attributes of events
concurrent validity
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
quantitative data
experiment
10. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
inductive method
construct validity
dependent variable or effect
research
11. 1.00 and -1.00
determinism
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
deductive method
research
12. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
experimental will consist of
The ABAB design
Content validity
correlational coefficient
13. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
AB design
inductive method
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
construct validity
14. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
empiricism
Science
sample
Content validity
15. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
inductive method
theory
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
16. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
alternative hypothesis state
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
qualitative data
pretest - posttest control group design
17. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
multigroup pretest - posttest design
predictive validity/criterion validity
correlational coefficient
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
18. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
empiricism
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
experiment
hypothesis
19. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
pretest - posttest control group design
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
dependent variable or effect
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
20. Are verbal description of attributes of events
Science
qualitative data
theory
concurrent validity
21. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
reliability
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
split - half reliability
22. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
experiment
test - retest - reliability
split - half reliability
construct validity
23. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
single subject designs
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
AB design
scientific data should meet these two criteria
24. There is no relationship between two measures
split - half reliability
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
theory
25. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
correlational coefficient
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
The researcher's hopes
26. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
correlational coefficient
AB design
control group
null hypothesis
27. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
determinism
sample
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
ex post facto research
28. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
research
correlational coefficient
deductive method
The ABAB design
29. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
surveys
hypothesis
quantitative data
research
30. States that 2 variables are not related
hypothesis
The ABAB design
null hypothesis
experimental will consist of
31. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
mulitple baseline deisngs
data
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
32. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
Science
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
deductive method
test - retest - reliability
33. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
ex post facto research
Content validity
theory
34. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
concurrent validity
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
only one group
35. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
experimental will consist of
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
dependent variable or effect
theory
36. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
37. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
mulitple baseline deisngs
data
only one group
deductive method
38. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
quantitative data
theory
empiricism
qualitative data
39. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
pretest - posttest control group design
split - half reliability
validity
sample
40. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
Content validity
correlational coefficient
validity
41. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
AB design
single subject designs
reliability
The ABAB design
42. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
multigroup pretest - posttest design
test - retest - reliability
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
experimental will consist of
43. Non - experimental will consist of
pretest - posttest control group design
only one group
test - retest - reliability
experiment
44. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
null hypothesis
AB design
concurrent validity
control group
45. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
deductive method
correlational coefficient
hypothesis
concurrent validity
46. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
determinism
multigroup pretest - posttest design
theory
alternative hypothesis state
47. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
determinism
hypothesis
multigroup pretest - posttest design
experimental will consist of
48. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
qualitative data
predictive validity/criterion validity
validity
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
//
//