SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
correlational coefficient
Content validity
2. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
empiricism
surveys
data
mulitple baseline deisngs
3. Observations and measurement
The researcher's hopes
correlational coefficient
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
construct validity
4. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
construct validity
inductive method
AB design
scientific data should meet these two criteria
5. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
surveys
data
quantitative data
reliability
6. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
qualitative data
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
determinism
test - retest - reliability
7. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
single subject designs
dependent variable or effect
validity
sample
8. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
sample
ex post facto research
reliability
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
9. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
data
Science
concurrent validity
ex post facto research
10. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
experiment
sample
qualitative data
11. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
experimental will consist of
Science
The ABAB design
12. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
scientific data should meet these two criteria
sample
single subject designs
multigroup pretest - posttest design
13. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
theory
AB design
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
predictive validity/criterion validity
14. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
predictive validity/criterion validity
deductive method
mulitple baseline deisngs
sample
15. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
control group
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
null hypothesis
quantitative data
16. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
single subject designs
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
17. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
mulitple baseline deisngs
surveys
control group
dependent variable or effect
18. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
single subject designs
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
hypothesis
19. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
correlational coefficient
split - half reliability
Content validity
control group
20. There is no relationship between two measures
dependent variable or effect
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
empiricism
alternative hypothesis state
21. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
reliability
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
AB design
22. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
predictive validity/criterion validity
validity
sample
concurrent validity
23. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
single subject designs
split - half reliability
experimental will consist of
AB design
24. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
qualitative data
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
test - retest - reliability
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
25. Non - experimental will consist of
pretest - posttest control group design
determinism
qualitative data
only one group
26. 1.00 and -1.00
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
qualitative data
research
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
27. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
Content validity
experimental will consist of
correlational coefficient
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
28. Are numerical description of attributes of events
quantitative data
test - retest - reliability
multigroup pretest - posttest design
The ABAB design
29. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
surveys
The researcher's hopes
independent variable
30. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
qualitative data
single subject designs
only one group
sample
31. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
experimental will consist of
construct validity
reliability
concurrent validity
32. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
independent variable
reliability
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
The ABAB design
33. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
only one group
The researcher's hopes
research
Content validity
34. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
only one group
mulitple baseline deisngs
35. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
alternative hypothesis state
only one group
pretest - posttest control group design
36. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
37. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
independent variable
correlational coefficient
null hypothesis
deductive method
38. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
ex post facto research
split - half reliability
research
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
39. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
multigroup pretest - posttest design
predictive validity/criterion validity
inductive method
AB design
40. States that 2 variables are not related
pretest - posttest control group design
null hypothesis
alternative hypothesis state
construct validity
41. Are verbal description of attributes of events
predictive validity/criterion validity
Science
qualitative data
dependent variable or effect
42. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
reliability
validity
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
research
43. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
independent variable
reliability
alternative hypothesis state
deductive method
44. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
mulitple baseline deisngs
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
dependent variable or effect
surveys
45. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
control group
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
mulitple baseline deisngs
experiment
46. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
theory
scientific data should meet these two criteria
alternative hypothesis state
validity
47. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
determinism
dependent variable or effect
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
inductive method
48. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
The researcher's hopes
dependent variable or effect
experiment