SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. States that 2 variables are not related
null hypothesis
Science
experiment
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
2. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
AB design
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
construct validity
control group
3. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
theory
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
surveys
The ABAB design
4. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
hypothesis
single subject designs
theory
5. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
inductive method
data
Science
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
6. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
Content validity
empiricism
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
theory
7. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
predictive validity/criterion validity
Science
deductive method
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
8. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
single subject designs
pretest - posttest control group design
experimental will consist of
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
9. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
inductive method
pretest - posttest control group design
AB design
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
10. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
test - retest - reliability
reliability
ex post facto research
deductive method
11. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
dependent variable or effect
deductive method
pretest - posttest control group design
empiricism
12. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
validity
correlational coefficient
test - retest - reliability
13. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
deductive method
test - retest - reliability
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
14. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
Content validity
determinism
construct validity
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
15. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
single subject designs
null hypothesis
dependent variable or effect
16. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
ex post facto research
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
research
17. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
deductive method
single subject designs
control group
18. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
theory
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
independent variable
19. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
mulitple baseline deisngs
validity
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
inductive method
20. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
Content validity
qualitative data
quantitative data
experimental will consist of
21. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
concurrent validity
test - retest - reliability
deductive method
predictive validity/criterion validity
22. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
theory
predictive validity/criterion validity
dependent variable or effect
ex post facto research
23. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
ex post facto research
scientific data should meet these two criteria
hypothesis
inductive method
24. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
predictive validity/criterion validity
Content validity
experiment
25. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
quantitative data
dependent variable or effect
experimental will consist of
multigroup pretest - posttest design
26. There is no relationship between two measures
experimental will consist of
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
quantitative data
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
27. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
Content validity
independent variable
surveys
data
28. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
predictive validity/criterion validity
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
single subject designs
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
29. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
sample
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
predictive validity/criterion validity
single subject designs
30. Observations and measurement
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
multigroup pretest - posttest design
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
31. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
sample
qualitative data
Science
pretest - posttest control group design
32. Are verbal description of attributes of events
alternative hypothesis state
independent variable
control group
qualitative data
33. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
correlational coefficient
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
Science
reliability
34. Are numerical description of attributes of events
Science
Content validity
reliability
quantitative data
35. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
36. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
AB design
split - half reliability
test - retest - reliability
reliability
37. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
control group
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
theory
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
38. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
validity
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
research
split - half reliability
39. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
surveys
theory
scientific data should meet these two criteria
inductive method
40. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
mulitple baseline deisngs
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
AB design
41. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
concurrent validity
determinism
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
quantitative data
42. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
alternative hypothesis state
inductive method
determinism
empiricism
43. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
surveys
data
dependent variable or effect
pretest - posttest control group design
44. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
theory
Content validity
AB design
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
45. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
Science
alternative hypothesis state
split - half reliability
null hypothesis
46. Non - experimental will consist of
AB design
correlational coefficient
only one group
independent variable
47. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
data
dependent variable or effect
AB design
split - half reliability
48. 1.00 and -1.00
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
sample
construct validity
hypothesis