SUBJECTS
|
BROWSE
|
CAREER CENTER
|
POPULAR
|
JOIN
|
LOGIN
Business Skills
|
Soft Skills
|
Basic Literacy
|
Certifications
About
|
Help
|
Privacy
|
Terms
|
Email
Search
Test your basic knowledge |
Praxis Essentials Of Scientific Method
Start Test
Study First
Subjects
:
praxis
,
science
Instructions:
Answer 48 questions in 15 minutes.
If you are not ready to take this test, you can
study here
.
Match each statement with the correct term.
Don't refresh. All questions and answers are randomly picked and ordered every time you load a test.
This is a study tool. The 3 wrong answers for each question are randomly chosen from answers to other questions. So, you might find at times the answers obvious, but you will see it re-enforces your understanding as you take the test each time.
1. Are playing an increasing role in establishing efficacy of treatment procedures used in speech. These designs help distinguish cause - effect relations based on individual performances under different conditions of experiment.
Science
single subject designs
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
deductive method
2. There is no relationship between two measures
research
control group
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
data
3. Events do not happen randomly or haphazardly; they are caused by other events.
null hypothesis
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
determinism
4. 1. describe natural events or phenomena 2. understand and explain natural phenomena; especially in terms of cause - effect relationships 3. predict occurrences of events; and 4. control natural phenomena by understanding the causes of events and pred
The goals of science (Hedge - 2003; Maxwell & Satake - 1997)
reliability
sample
validity
5. Validity and reliability they are critical aspects of scientific measurement
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
quantitative data
scientific data should meet these two criteria
6. Means of establishing cause - effect relationships. test if - then relationships
AB design
experiment
control group
Science
7. Refers to the extent to which two or more observers agree in measuring an event. Ex. if 3 judges independently rate the fluency of a subject - there is high interjudge reliability if there is good agreement between he judges.
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
empiricism
ex post facto research
quantitative data
8. Is the accuracy with which a test predicts future performance on a related task. ex. a graduate student's score on a comprehensive exam might predict whether or not he or she will be a competent clinician
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
predictive validity/criterion validity
alternative hypothesis state
scientific data should meet these two criteria
9. Explain - first - and - verify - later approach - A scientist will propose a theory first and then verify it.
split - half reliability
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
deductive method
empiricism
10. That the 2 variables are indeed related; perhaps one is the cause of the other
research
pretest - posttest control group design
determinism
alternative hypothesis state
11. There are two groups; an experimental group and a control group. This design is to evaluate the effects of a single treatment
pretest - posttest control group design
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
reliability
scientific data should meet these two criteria
12. A) the treatment is offered B) and the progress is summarized is the case study
AB design
empiricism
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
null hypothesis
13. Two or more groups. It contains participants who receive treatment and thus show changes in behaviors treated
multigroup pretest - posttest design
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
experimental will consist of
independent variable
14. Is the degree to which test scores are CONSISTENT with the theoretical constructs or concepts
ex post facto research
empiricism
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
construct validity
15. 1.00 and -1.00
AB design
qualitative data
the highest and lowest possible positive value of r
surveys
16. Refers to the extend to which the same observer repeatedly measures the same event consistently. Ex. if the same clinician rate a child's intelligibility over several sessions - those ratings would be consistent if there is good intraobserver reliabi
scientific data should meet these two criteria
hypothesis
experiment
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
17. Are the result of systematic observation and in many cases experimentation
data
surveys
pretest - posttest control group design
mulitple baseline deisngs
18. Is what scientists do as they practice science. It is the process of asking and answering questions ; it includes steps scientists take as they search for uniformity and order in nature. it is methodological. It is basically science in action!
dependent variable or effect
Science
research
sample
19. Is based on the consistency of measures when two parallel forms of the same tests are administered tot he same people.
quantitative data
scientific data should meet these two criteria
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
20. Considered a form of criterion - related validity - ist he degree to which a new test correlates with an established test of known validity
empiricism
qualitative data
test - retest - reliability
concurrent validity
21. A philosophy of events and nature that values evidence more than opinions. It is conceptual and philosophical
surveys
Science
intraobserver or intrajudge reliability
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
22. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis because the research often believes in the alternative hypothesis
23. A systematic body of information concerning a phenomenon - describing an event - explaining why the event occurs - and specifying how the theory can be verified causable variables; a theory states that X causes Y
mulitple baseline deisngs
theory
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
single subject designs
24. Concerned with more specific prediction stemming from a theory. it is a proposed answer to a specific question. They are testable propositions derived from a theory.
predictive validity/criterion validity
AB design
research
hypothesis
25. Observations and measurement
empiricism
validity
alternative hypothesis state
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
26. It is not always possible to randomly draw participants from specific clinical populations.
sample
reliability
correlational coefficient
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
27. Assess some characteristics of group of people or a particular society. they attempt to discover how variables such as attitudes - opinion - or certain social practices are distributed in a population
surveys
test - retest - reliability
quantitative data
concurrent validity
28. A measure of test validity based on a systematic examination of all test items to determine if they adequately sample the full range of the skill being tested and if they are relevant to measuring what the test purports to measure.
test - retest - reliability
Science
Content validity
experimental will consist of
29. An experiment first - and - explain later approach - A scientist would experiment first and then propose a theory based upon the results of the experiment
inductive method
validity
correlational coefficient
empiricism
30. Is the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure
theory
experiment
alternative hypothesis state
validity
31. Are verbal description of attributes of events
control group
sample
theory
qualitative data
32. A) condition refers to baseline B) treatment A) condition refers to treatment withdrawal B) reinstatement of the treatment
mulitple baseline deisngs
The ABAB design
dependent variable or effect
The researcher's hopes
33. Non - experimental will consist of
predictive validity/criterion validity
data
only one group
scientific data should meet these two criteria
34. Is a number or index that indicates the relationship between two or more independent measures. usually expressed through Pearson Product moment r
single subject designs
correlational coefficient
null hypothesis
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
35. Refers to the consistency with which the same event is measure repeatedly. most are expressed in terms of correlational coefficient
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
pretest - posttest control group design
reliability
Content validity
36. Refers to consistency of measures when the same test is administered to the same people twice. When the two sets of scores are positively correlated - the stability of the scores over time is assumed
surveys
empiricism
test - retest - reliability
scientific data should meet these two criteria
37. The philosophical position that statements must be supported by experimental or observational evidence
hypothesis
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
empiricism
experiment
38. Are numerical description of attributes of events
quantitative data
correlational coefficient
interobserver or inerjudge reliability
The ABAB design
39. A small number of participants needed for the study form the population
predictive validity/criterion validity
sample
ex post facto research
AB design
40. Is the variable that is affected by the manipulation of the independent variable. In treatment research - all disorders are dependent variables (disorder or particular skill) they must be defined good so that they are measurable
scientific data should meet these two criteria
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability
dependent variable or effect
Content validity
41. Is after the fact research. the investigator begins with the effect of independent variables that have occurred in the past. Thus the investigator is making a retrospective search for causes of events (Hegde - 2003)
surveys
concurrent validity
correlational coefficient
ex post facto research
42. It evaluates the relative effects of two or more treatments. A question of relative effects asks: Which treatment is more effective? An investigator randomly selects a sample from a population and randomly assigns them to one of the three groups. the
empiricism
concurrent validity
what a r value of 0.00 indicates
multigroup pretest - posttest design
43. A measure of internal consistency of a test. It is determined by showing that the responses to items on the first half of a test are correlated with responses given on the second half. It generally overestimates reliability because it does not measur
split - half reliability
null hypothesis
research
reliability
44. Is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The manipulation causes changes in the dependent variable. All treatments are independent variables
independent variable
split - half reliability
events must be experienced in such a way to permit
The ABAB design
45. States that 2 variables are not related
The researcher's hopes
AB design
single subject designs
null hypothesis
46. They may not allow extension of the study's results t the individual clients.
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
hypothesis
test - retest - reliability
qualitative data
47. A single subject design that aids the disadvantage of treatment withdrawal. the effects of treatment are demonstrated by showing that untreated skills did not change and only the treated skills did. . it is across subjects - setting - and across beha
mulitple baseline deisngs
experiment
a major limitation of group experimental designs is that
research
48. Contains participants who do not receive treatment. The goal of having these tow groups is to demonstrate that the experimental participants improved and the control participants did not - thus showing the efficacy of the treatment
a major limitation of true group experimental designs is that
correlational coefficient
control group
alternate from reliability/parallel from reliability